Hi,
Le 17/07/2015 12:59, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
On Friday, 17 July 2015 11:40:04 UTC+1, Snark wrote:
Hi,
Le 16/07/2015 13:16, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
> On 2015-07-16 13:03, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>> What is somebody has such an
>> install and *wants* to use it with Sage?
> This points to the core problem: we simply have no way to guess
whether
> people want to do that or not.
>
> Here is a possible compromise proposal:
> * keep default optional package as they are now
> * add a new flag --optional=external (or change --optional=all to do
> this) to test all auto-detected-but-not-part-of-Sage packages like
> mathematica.
> * add a corresponding Makefile target running tests with this flag.
>
Here is another idea : don't put the interface to the external package
in sage-the-library, but in an optional package.
this presently means that such packages become upstream w.r.t. Sage.
An extra burden to maintain etc...
I'm not sure I understand how it can be an extra burden, and I have no
clue about the caetera...
Snark on #sagemath
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
