On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 5:01:38 AM UTC+1, rjf wrote:
>
> I don't know what nonsense you are trying out,  but 
> f(r,phi):=signum(r^2-4)  is a function that does not
> depend on phi.
>
> If you want to integrate functions that are discontinuous, there are two 
> processes
> involved.  One: find the continuous pieces and break up the problem.
> Two, integrate, as appropriate.
>
> So if your system is unable to find the continuous pieces, it is not a
> problem in integration, really.  
>
> If I had a complicated expression S(x) that I thought was identically zero,
> but I couldn't prove it,  I could make it into an integration problem...
>
> integrate(S(x),x,a,b)     
>
> which would be zero for all a and b.
>
> So now should I report a failure to return a specific answer as an 
> integration problem??
>
> Moral of the story: if  you want to report a bug, it is polite to find the 
> simplest demonstration
> of the defect that you can.
>
>
> Finally, this message demonstrates a major defect in the idea behind Sage.
> That is, people involved in the project might find a problem, but they have
> insufficient expertise to do anything substantive about it.  If there are
> bugs in Maxima, go learn about Maxima.  Maybe fix it.  
>

yeah, and if a project finds a gcc bug, it must also fix it itself?
This clearly demonstrate a major defect in the idea behind almost
every project that uses gcc - every such project must have experts capable 
of
fixing bugs in gcc...

  

>
> On Saturday, April 9, 2016 at 12:19:31 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> maxima's definite integration is quite buggy, we see dozens bugs like 
>> this a year, and report them upstream, with limited success...
>>  
>>
> If you learned some Lisp, and maybe something about algorithms for 
> integration
> you could fix them yourself.
>

I knew some Lisp dialect, although I didn't write anything in Lisp for 
almost 20 years.
I would love to learn more about symbolic integration, but I don't have 
time. 
(perhaps one day my job becomes more stable, and I won't have as much 
publish or perish
pressure as I have now).

rjf, perhaps you might help out maintainers of 
the Maxima definite integration package? You certainly have skills, and 
time...


  

>  
>
>>
>> On Saturday, April 9, 2016 at 7:17:09 PM UTC+1, Sergey V Kozlukov wrote:
>>>
>>> (%i1) f(r,phi) := signum(r^2 - 4);
>>>                                                2
>>> (%o1)                     f(r, phi) := signum(r  - 4)
>>> (%i2) integrate(integrate(r*f(r,phi), r, 0, 3), phi, 0, 2*%pi);
>>> (%o2)                               - 9 %pi
>>>
>>> That's strange
>>>
>>>
>>> суббота, 9 апреля 2016 г., 19:14:49 UTC+3 пользователь Dima Pasechnik 
>>> написал:
>>>>
>>>> Try these computations directly in Maxima, and see whether it's still a 
>>>> discrepancy there.
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, April 9, 2016 at 1:31:44 PM UTC+1, Sergey V Kozlukov wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> x, y, r, phi = var('x y r phi')
>>>>> f(x, y) = sign(x^2 + y^2 - 4)
>>>>> T(r, phi) = [r*cos(phi), r*sin(phi)]
>>>>> J = diff(T).det().simplify_full()
>>>>> T_f = f.substitute(x=T[0], y=T[1])
>>>>> int_f = integral(integral(T_f*abs(J), r, 0, 3), phi, 0, 2*pi).
>>>>> simplify_full()
>>>>> show(r"$\iint\limits_\Omega%s = %s$"%(latex(f(x)), latex(int_f)))
>>>>> Returns correct answer: $\pi$, while
>>>>> x, y, r, phi = var('x y r phi')
>>>>> f(x, y) = sign(x^2 + y^2 - 4)
>>>>> T(r, phi) = [r*cos(phi), r*sin(phi)]
>>>>> J = diff(T).det() #.simplify_full()
>>>>> T_f = f.substitute(x=T[0], y=T[1])
>>>>> int_f = integral(integral(T_f*abs(J), r, 0, 3), phi, 0, 2*pi).
>>>>> simplify_full()
>>>>> show(r"$\iint\limits_\Omega%s = %s$"%(latex(f(x)), latex(int_f)))
>>>>> Yields $-9\pi$
>>>>> The only thing simplify_full() changes here is it applies identity 
>>>>> $\sin^2 + \cos^2 = 1$
>>>>>
>>>>> Code was executed in SMC worksheet
>>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to