On 12/01/17 10:41, 'Julien Puydt' via sage-devel wrote:
I have to point out that this isn't auto-generated since a specific
command has to be entered.

I also notice that towncrier has pretty rough single-level structuring
(feature, bugfix, doc, removal, misc), which might be a bit limitative
for a large project like sagemath.

Wouldn't some directive like "If you think ticket #314159 is of wider
interest, all you have to do is to fill in the Changes-7.6.rst file"
make it possible to both drop this new tool and allow a richer
structure? Said Changes-<version>.rst could start as a copy from a
Changes-template.rst with a prepared structured, which the release
manager would prune at the last moment to remove empty sections.

Snark on #sagemath

What do you think about Debian packages' changelog format?
As a non-expert, I see one can easily add new entries with dch, and there are tools which know how to parse the changelog file.

Regards,
TB

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to