FWIW: Hannes wrote in the Singular forum that he finds it a bad idea to use 64 bit integers, because it would behave differently on 32bit machines. He also argues that bigint vectors exist in Singular, since there are bigint *matrices* in Singular; right, but the syntax is different and thus it isn't a drop-in replacement. And he wrote that making hilb(id,1) use bigint vectors would imply a complete rewrite of the function, and if I volunteer to implement it; although I'd expect that it is mainly "search-and-replace", I am not so sure if I volunteer.
So, at the moment I am trying to implement something in Sage, using sage.rings.polynomial.polydict.ETuple as data structure. I guess the implementation will go to either sage.rings.polynomial.polydict or better to a new module sage.rings.polynomial.hilbert. Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
