Hi Clement,

On 2018-09-04, Clement Pernet <clement.per...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 02/09/2018 à 14:13, Simon King a écrit :
>> /home/king/Projekte/Macaulay2/M2/M2/usr-host/include/fflas-ffpack/fflas/fflas_ftrsm_src.inl:279:27:
>>  error: ‘openblas_set_num_threads’ was not declared in this scope
>>     openblas_set_num_threads(__FFLASFFPACK_OPENBLAS_NUM_THREADS);
>>                             ^
>> cc1plus: warning: unrecognized command line option ‘-Wno-mismatched-tags’
>> ../../include/config.Makefile:226: recipe for target 'interface.o' failed
>> make[2]: *** [interface.o] Error 1
>> make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/king/Projekte/Macaulay2/M2/M2/Macaulay2/d'
>> Makefile:20: recipe for target 'all-in-d' failed
>> make[1]: *** [all-in-d] Error 2
>>     ==> Currently Macaulay2 is no option.
>
> Hi,
>
> Actually, not only givaro but also fflas-ffpack (another dependency of 
> macaulay2) is in sagemath.
> Your compilation error seem to indicate a mess in the configuration: you have 
> probably 2 installs of 
> fflas-ffpack, one in SageMath, the other one in Macaulay2 of different 
> versions and this likely 
> causes the compilation failure.
> Maybe use the Sage's provided givaro is a bad idea as it forces you to also 
> know about Sage's 
> fflas-ffpack and I don't know if it is possible to disable Macaulay's 
> fflas-ffpack when configuring it.

Problem: How to install givaro? "sudo apt-get install givaro" doesn't
work, and libgivaro-dev is already installed (actually I installed it as
advised by Macaulay2's INSTALL instructions. And when I just did
./configure --enable-download followed by "make" again, the error bacame
differently:
  make: Entering directory '/home/king/Projekte/Macaulay2/M2/M2'
  : "checking for strings that look like undefined configure variables
  in all *.in files..."
  C libraries all
  make: C: Command not found
  GNUmakefile:194: recipe for target 'all-in-libraries' failed
  make: [all-in-libraries] Error 127 (ignored)

etc.

But I think at some point in this thread someone has said that Macaulay2
isn't actually maintained. So, I really don't think I shoud make my
group cohomology package depend on it.

Best regards,
Simon

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to