On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 9:58 AM Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> wrote: > > On 2018-09-29, Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> wrote: > > Too bad: When the error occurs and I adjust the pool size then > > afterwards the previously defined objects in gap are gone. > > Additional problem: Even when I increase the memory limit sufficiently, > gap-via-pexpect takes substantially longer than libgap to compute the > double cosets. Why is that? There shouldn't be big traffic in the > interface whan just doing DC = G.DoubleCosetRepsAndSizes(N,N).
Just use libGAP, perhaps? (and do the port of the corresponding functionality to libGAP, if you have time) > > Cheers, > Simon > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-support" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.