On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 9:58 AM Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> wrote:
>
> On 2018-09-29, Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> wrote:
> > Too bad: When the error occurs and I adjust the pool size then
> > afterwards the previously defined objects in gap are gone.
>
> Additional problem: Even when I increase the memory limit sufficiently,
> gap-via-pexpect takes substantially longer than libgap to compute the
> double cosets. Why is that? There shouldn't be big traffic in the
> interface whan just doing DC = G.DoubleCosetRepsAndSizes(N,N).

Just use libGAP, perhaps?
(and do the port of the corresponding functionality to libGAP, if you have time)

>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sage-support" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to