On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 10:09 AM Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> wrote: > > Hi Dima, > > On 2018-09-29, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There is no real harm in doing > > set_gap_memory_pool_size(10*get_gap_memory_pool_size()) > > Yes, there is (see my other post). The computation takes much much > longer than in libgap. > > > If coset enumeration is the bottleneck, you should not use GAP's > > built-in one, by use the one in ACE GAP package, > > it is much faster and efficient with memory etc. > > Is ACE part of the gap_packages spkg?
It's not ATM, but can and should be easily fixed. > If so: How to use its double coset > unumerator? Note that it is really about DOUBLE cosets. The cosets are > of no real use here. How many (single) cosets are you talking about? Once you have a permutation representation, these double coset computations are very fast. I am almost sure GAP first enumerates (single) cosets, anyway. > > Best regards, > Simon > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-support" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
