Hi Dima, On 2018-09-29, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is no real harm in doing > set_gap_memory_pool_size(10*get_gap_memory_pool_size())
Yes, there is (see my other post). The computation takes much much longer than in libgap. > If coset enumeration is the bottleneck, you should not use GAP's > built-in one, by use the one in ACE GAP package, > it is much faster and efficient with memory etc. Is ACE part of the gap_packages spkg? If so: How to use its double coset unumerator? Note that it is really about DOUBLE cosets. The cosets are of no real use here. Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
