Are you currently using the %e variable in your alerts in order to determine 
the reason for the down?   Are only 80% or 20% of the pings successful?  
Perhaps some other reason?   Ping checks are the MOST reliable in my 
installation.   I have two for all network links.  One has a crazy high timeout 
to verify if the link is down.   The second one has a shorter timeout to 
determine latency.   

It wouldn't hurt to review how the timeout with a ping works since it has been 
a source of confusion in the past:
A 5 second timeout with 5 pings is actually 1 second per ping. 
a 10 second timeout with 1 ping is one ping with timeout of ten seconds. 
A 4 second timeout with 2 packets is two pings with a timeout of 2 seconds each.




Jason Passow
Mississippi Welders Supply
http://www.mwsco.com
jas...@mwsco.com
ph: (507) 494-5178
fax: (507) 454-8104



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Heath Abbate [mailto:habb...@cafepress.com]
To: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:sal...@woodstone.nu]
Sent: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:15:19 -0500
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Servers Alive Flakey?



Various types of alerts. 

 

Ping checks, disk space checks, service checks, *nix checks. 

 

2 methods for verifying false alerts 

 

1.      Having another product monitor the same things – salive will bark, 
the other won’t. 

2.      Checking as soon as the alert is fired off.  Just last night it claimed 
all our network devices were down. None of them were. 

 

I do have a few hundred checks.  Maybe I am checking too often?  Can Salive get 
flakey if its constantly checking?  IE maybe there is some overlap in the next 
cycle starting before the previous is done? 

 

 

From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu 
(mailto:salive@woodstone.nu)] On Behalf Of Kevin Stone
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 8:56 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: Re: [SA-list] Servers Alive Flakey? 

 

I've been using it for years in several different jobs. It's never been flakey 
and even now when I have a full suite of HP Openview tools I still use it as 
the sanity check.

What makes you believe these are false alerts?  Some condition has occurred 
that triggered them.  What type of monitor is it?

-Kevin 

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Heath Abbate <habb...@cafepress.com 
(mailto:habb...@cafepress.com)> wrote: 

Just curious if I am the only one.

Had the product over a year now installed on 3 different machines and it’s 
never been a solid performer. 

I would say over 50% of our alerts over the last year have been false.

I am running out of excuses to give to my director for the product.

Is it solid for you guys?  If so, is there some magic combo of hardware, os / 
patch level, etc.....

Need some help here or I think I am going to just have to abandon the product.

TIA 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

The contents of this message, together with any attachments, are intended only 
for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed and may 
contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the 
original sender immediately by telephone or by return E-mail and delete this 
message, along with any attachments, from your computer. Thank you. 




To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to 
salive@woodstone.nu (mailto:salive@woodstone.nu)
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that 
they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause 
you to be automatically removed from the list. 




To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to 
salive@woodstone.nu (mailto:salive@woodstone.nu)
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that 
they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause 
you to be automatically removed from the list. 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The
 contents of this message, together with any attachments, are intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed and may contain 
information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the 
original sender immediately by telephone or by return E-mail and delete this 
message, along with any attachments, from your computer. Thank you. Are you 
currentl


To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to 
salive@woodstone.nu (mailto:salive@woodstone.nu)
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that 
they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause 
you to be automatically removed from the list. 

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to 
salive@woodstone.nu
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that 
they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause 
you to be automatically removed from the list.

Reply via email to