At 09:28 AM 01/22/2003 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

w2k (2000) is just as userfreindly, but more stable.
This must be very user-dependant viewpoint. Over the course of a year and a half, I had Windows 2000 Professional dump out on me about a dozen times. I have yet to have Windows XP Professional crash on me since it was released. This is on and using the exact same hardware and applications that Windows 2000 choked on. As well, none of my Windows XP installations at work have puked even once but I have had the very infrequent support call about a Windows 2000 blue screen. So as a personal judgement/opinion based on about 50 Windows 2000 and 30 Windows XP installations, I've found XP to be more stable.

-Jeff -------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/



Reply via email to