MY choice would be XP I work on home pc's for friends and part time
business. XP comes with so many dirvers. I've had modems and NIC's not
operable with win 2000 and 9x! Ive installed the same hardware in an XP
computer and they worked great!! So it uses alittle more memory get MORE!
Preferably DDR
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Byrne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "sambar List Member" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 6:59 PM
Subject: [sambar] OS Upgrade {07}
> Wow. Holy OS wars again!
>
> Toss a coin. XP *is* the upgrade to 2000, and next year Windows 2004 (or
> whatever new name they choose this time) will be out and 2000 will have
the
> bad rap.
>
> 2000 is *much* more like XP than it is NT.
>
> With a few mouse clicks you'll find that XP can look *exactly* like 2000.
> There is NO learning curve whatsoever unless you like all the 'web
enabled'
> crap that doesn't add to the OS at all. All reports that I've seen, and
my
> own experience, shows that they are about equal in stability. XP does
boot
> up faster though :)
>
> I personally would'nt invest in an already announced end-of-life product,
> but both are good (for MS) operating systems.
> -------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/
>
-------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/
