Follow-up Comment #16, task #2874 (project savane):
> *adad* and _adada_ are way more common, have an history from
> the days when no mail client was handling html.
Hm, that's a fair point.
Given that we're currently supporting that (well, apart from _em_, but that
doesn't seem to be too difficult), we should just let this syntax be valid
markup.
But to serve the principle of least surprise, we could additionally allow
'''strong''' and ''em'' markup for those wikipedians out there.
I think this solution is my personal favourite.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=2874>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Savane-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/savane-dev
