You are correct -- the application built and seems to run using the
files contained in the zip file when unzipped (using linux unzip) into
the same directory from which one is building mupdf. I have not yet
tested it with xps files but with PDF files.
Should the built/made application be packaged as an installable RPM (and
source RPM using the sources supplied) for convenience of other users?
Yasha Karant
On 09/17/2011 10:32 AM, Stephen Isard wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:54:25 -0700, Yasha Karant<ykar...@csusb.edu> wrote:
I tried the binary executables of mudpf for linux on 5.7, but the glibc
is not compatible.
Yes, I found that too.
I then tried to make from source:
[ykarant@localhost mupdf-0.9] make
MKDIR build/debug
(snip)
CC build/debug/dev_text.o
fitz/dev_text.c:8:10: error: #include expects "FILENAME" or<FILENAME>
fitz/dev_text.c: In function ‘fz_text_extract_span’:
fitz/dev_text.c:324: warning: implicit declaration of function
‘FT_Get_Advance’
make: *** [build/debug/dev_text.o] Error 1
Also, no go. What did you do differently?
You don't mention getting the third party libraries at
http://www.mupdf.com/download/mupdf-thirdparty.zip as instructed in the
README. I did and unzipped them in the mupdf-0.9 directory. Apart from
that, I just did "make" the way you did.
Stephen Isard
