Actually, "Triumph of the Will" makes my argument better than yours.  This 
movie is best remembered for its continuing influence on movies, documentaries, 
and commercials - and by that, I mean its use of moving cameras, the use of 
telephoto lenses to create a distorted perspective, aerial photography, and its 
revolutionary approach to the use of music and cinematography.

~rave!

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, "B Smith" <daikaij...@...> wrote:
>
> So was Triumph of the Will but it's still a repellent piece of trash. 
> BOAN is groundbreaking but that the message and imagery will always overpower 
> the craft for me. 
> 
> Stephen Fetchit doesn't get a pass from me either. I just think Birth is the 
> worse offender. 
> 
> --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, "Kelwyn" <ravenadal@> wrote:
> >
> > I'll tell you why the dissemination of Stepin Fetchit is more insidious 
> > than "Birth of a Nation."  It is more insidious because it is "benign."  
> > "Birth of a Nation" (1915) is one vile movie which, even at its height, was 
> > seen by relatively small proportion of the nation's populace (due to lack 
> > of distribution and movie screens available in 1915).  Lincoln Perry made 
> > FIFTY-TWO movies between 1925 and 1976 - movies that had much more currency 
> > than "Nation" ever had.  Further, again unlike "Nation," which became a 
> > cinematic pariah and was rarely seen, Perry's movies became a staple of 
> > early afternoon and late night televison in the fifties and the sixties - 
> > further disseminating the lie of "the laziest man in the world."  
> > 
> > Many more politicians and employers were polluted by Perry's fifty-two 
> > movies than by "Birth of a Nation."
> > 
> > But, not to lose sight of my original assertion, "Birth of a Nation" is 
> > still a notable cinematic accomplishment - in spite of its content.
> > 
> > ~rave!
> > 
> > --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, "B Smith" <daikaiju66@> wrote:
> > >
> > > So the depiction of blacks as childish, chicken and watermelon eating 
> > > savages with an insatiable lust for white women didn't do as much harm as 
> > > Stephin Fetchit? Screenings of Birth of Nation directly lead to riots, 
> > > racial attacks and murders and was used as a recruitment tool by the KKK. 
> > > Sorry I respectfully disagree.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, "Kelwyn" <ravenadal@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Apples and oranges.  Still, a remarkable cinematic achievement. I was 
> > > > blown away when I saw it.  Griffith practically invented modern 
> > > > cinematic language.  
> > > > 
> > > > Indicting Griffith for the rise of KKK is like indicting Samuel Colt 
> > > > for drive by shootings.  Guilty as charged but, still, largely 
> > > > irrelevant.
> > > > 
> > > > Me, personally, would be more inclined to indict John M. Stahl ("In Old 
> > > > Kentucky"), the first director to employ Stepin Fetchit as "the Laziest 
> > > > Man in the World."  This image was waaaay more destructive to black 
> > > > people than anything in "Birth of a Nation."
> > > > 
> > > > ~rave! 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, "Mr. Worf" <HelloMahogany@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Shot by a genius that was personally responsible for the rebirth of 
> > > > > the kkk
> > > > > and the racial stereotypes about black men, and mexicans that are 
> > > > > still with
> > > > > us today.
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Kelwyn <ravenadal@> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Content aside, "Gone with the Wind" like "Birth of a Nation" is 
> > > > > > savvy,
> > > > > > populist entertainment.  If you are racially sensitive, avoid both 
> > > > > > at all
> > > > > > costs as the narratives will suck you in.  "Nation" is truly 
> > > > > > remarkable on
> > > > > > just a technical basis.  It is still a gorgeous looking film.  D.W. 
> > > > > > Griffith
> > > > > > was a cinematic genius.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ~rave!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson <KeithBJohnson@>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In terms of pure dollars, "Avatar" will soon become the biggest 
> > > > > > > of all
> > > > > > time. (In terms of dollars adjusted for time, sadly, I think "Gone 
> > > > > > With the
> > > > > > Wind" is still the champ).  The country-by-country breakdown is 
> > > > > > pretty
> > > > > > interesting. Australia over thirty mill, France, Algeria and 
> > > > > > Tunisia, over a
> > > > > > hundred, and ninety mill in Russia?  Wow, truly an international 
> > > > > > hit.Â
> > > > > > Even Turkey with eight million. But what's up with Syria: only 
> > > > > > eighty-seven
> > > > > > thousand?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=avatar.htm
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Post your SciFiNoir Profile at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add?fmvn=mapYahoo!
> > > > > > Groups Links
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
> > > > > Mahogany at: 
> > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to