I don't think I'll be able to stay for the Friday 10am discussion, but have a PR open on "efficient grid search" so should probably be involved.
Perhaps the fit_transform discussion can happen without you, Andy? On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 10:17, Andreas Mueller <t3k...@gmail.com> wrote: > I put a draft schedule here: > > https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/wiki/Upcoming-events#technical-discussions-schedule > > it's obviously somewhat opinionated ;) > Happy to reprioritize. > Basically I wouldn't like to miss any of the big API discussions because > coming late to the party. > > The two things on (grid?) searches are somewhat related: one is about > specifying search-spaces, the other about executing a given search space > efficiently. They probably warrant separate discussions. > > I haven't added plotting or sample props on it, which are maybe two other > discussion points. > I tried to cover most controversial things from the roadmap. > > Not sure if discussing the schedule via the mailing list is the best way? > Don't want to create even more traffic than I already am ;) > > On 2/19/19 5:48 PM, Guillaume Lemaître wrote: > > > Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule, given that he seems > to be running the show? > > Mostly running behind the show ... > > For the moment, we only have a 30 minutes presentation of introduction > planned on Monday. > For the rest of the week, this is pretty much opened and I think that we > can propose a schedule such that we can be efficient. > IMO, two meetings of an hour per day look good to me. > > Shall we prioritize the list of the issues? Maybe that some issues could > be packed together. > I would not be against having a rough schedule on the wiki directly and I > think that having it before Monday could be better. > > Let me know how I can help. > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 22:23, Andreas Mueller <t3k...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yeah, sounds good. >> I didn't want to unilaterally post a schedule, but doing some google form >> or similar seems a bit heavy-handed? >> Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule, given that he seems >> to be running the show? >> >> On 2/19/19 4:17 PM, Joel Nothman wrote: >> >> I don't think optics requires a large meeting, just a few people. >> >> I'm happy with your proposal generally, Andy. Do we schedule specific >> topics at this point? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> scikit-learn mailing >> listscikit-learn@python.orghttps://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> scikit-learn mailing list >> scikit-learn@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >> > > > -- > Guillaume Lemaitre > INRIA Saclay - Parietal team > Center for Data Science Paris-Saclay > https://glemaitre.github.io/ > > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing > listscikit-learn@python.orghttps://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > > > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
