One other topic that I kind of forgot about are keyword-only arguments.
I like the idea of the decorator that I proposed but Joel didn't like
it, I think ;)
We might want to think about other Python3 features like type
annotations as well.
On 2/20/19 4:40 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 06:16:20PM -0500, Andreas Mueller wrote:
I put a draft schedule here:
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/wiki/Upcoming-events#technical-discussions-schedule
I'd like to discuss sample_props. They are important to me.
Should I add them somewhere on the schedule? Maybe in a place where
people who care about them (AFAIK Joel and Alex also do) are available?
Gaël
it's obviously somewhat opinionated ;)
Happy to reprioritize.
Basically I wouldn't like to miss any of the big API discussions because coming
late to the party.
The two things on (grid?) searches are somewhat related: one is about
specifying search-spaces, the other about executing a given search space
efficiently. They probably warrant separate discussions.
I haven't added plotting or sample props on it, which are maybe two other
discussion points.
I tried to cover most controversial things from the roadmap.
Not sure if discussing the schedule via the mailing list is the best way? Don't
want to create even more traffic than I already am ;)
On 2/19/19 5:48 PM, Guillaume Lemaître wrote:
> Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule, given that he seems
to be running the show?
Mostly running behind the show ...
For the moment, we only have a 30 minutes presentation of introduction
planned on Monday.
For the rest of the week, this is pretty much opened and I think that we
can propose a schedule such that we can be efficient.
IMO, two meetings of an hour per day look good to me.
Shall we prioritize the list of the issues? Maybe that some issues could be
packed together.
I would not be against having a rough schedule on the wiki directly and I
think that having it before Monday could be better.
Let me know how I can help.
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 22:23, Andreas Mueller <t3k...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, sounds good.
I didn't want to unilaterally post a schedule, but doing some google
form or similar seems a bit heavy-handed?
Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule, given that he seems
to be running the show?
On 2/19/19 4:17 PM, Joel Nothman wrote:
I don't think optics requires a large meeting, just a few people.
I'm happy with your proposal generally, Andy. Do we schedule
specific topics at this point?
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
