On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 21:10 +0100, Dirk Bächle wrote: […] > > you're aware of the fact that we already have a branch for this > (python3-port)?
It is though now seriously out of date, and not being worked on by people doing things, just talked about by people like me hoping things. […] > > At some point after the v2.5 release, we should probably just merge the > current "python3-port" into "default"...and then put all our > efforts into making it work. From then on it's a mixed 2.7/3.x codebase...and > we don't look back. I am for this idea. Keep a set of Python 2.7 buildbots which must always be green and a set of Python 3.4 buildbots on the same codebase which we try and get green a quickly as possible. I think the experiment with two long-lived branches has proven ineffective. I am very much for a single code base that always work on 2.7 and moves to be working on 3.4. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
