dear mr. christoph schaefer > It would be helpful if you could rephrase both of your latest > replies, because a) some operative (and grammatically necessary) > words seem to be missing; b) sentences are unfinished; and c) you > moved the goalposts by introducing several other terms. > > Honestly, I'm struggling to make sense of these postings. More > consistency would be helpful to frame the debate.
sorry for having confused you. it was not my goal. just one more thing from my side: my aim is to avoid the use of the word "link" for the chains of text frames. i don't "need" the term "chain" to be used, even if i still think, it's a fitting term. best regards a.l.e
