DIS: Re: BUS: Let's get things moving
On 24 June 2012 23:26, FKA441344 441...@gmail.com wrote: I intend to, With Notice, initiate a criminal case: omd violated Rule 2143 by failing to distribute by the end of Sun. 24 June proposals in the proposal pool that were in there at the beginning of Mon. 18 June. Do we really need constant criminal cases about slightly late reports when the game is moving as slowly as it is?
DIS: Re: BUS: hello world
On 06/25/2012 02:24 PM, Noé Rubinstein wrote: The game is slow enough nowadays for me not to mind giving it a go; I would hate for my first time to be unambiguous, though, so here I go. Also, the usual CFJ. AGAINT
DIS: Re: BUS: hello world
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:19 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Arguments: The usual CFJ, despite being established in game custom, doesn't have a standard phrasing, although there are some common ones. (I am a player or Phlogistique is a player are two plausible wordings.) I'd say that the meaning of the statement of the CFJ is unambiguous, but the exact statement of the phrasing is ambiguous. Does that matter? I would have thought that the specific wording of the CFJ created by my message would be Also, the usual CFJ. (Not sure if and how that relates to your point.) -- Noé Rubinstein
DIS: Re: BUS: hello world
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: Arguments: In context, I consider here I go a reasonably unambiguous equivalent of I become a player. Gratuitous: I intended here I go to reference the act of posting a message, not the act of registering. -- Noé Rubinstein
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: hello world
Pavitra wrote: On 06/25/2012 02:24 PM, Noé Rubinstein wrote: The game is slow enough nowadays for me not to mind giving it a go; I would hate for my first time to be unambiguous, though, so here I go. Also, the usual CFJ. AGAINT Context for the newcomers: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1260 http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1261 These days, AGAINT is treated the same as any other Rule 754 (1) typo (see Judge Zefram's arguments in CFJ 1885). I thought we'd decided otherwise, but apparently I remembered wrong (or at least it's only ambiguous if the poster says ha ha, this is ambiguous! or something along those lines). Here's the message that Zefram mentions: http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2007-December/008784.html
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: hello world
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: These days, AGAINT is treated the same as any other Rule 754 (1) typo (see Judge Zefram's arguments in CFJ 1885). I thought we'd decided otherwise, but apparently I remembered wrong (or at least it's only ambiguous if the poster says ha ha, this is ambiguous! or something along those lines). I'm surprised as well; you've treated AGAINT as ambiguous several times since, and its being ambiguous was referred to in CFJ 2793. I think by this point game custom has progressed so that it actually is ambiguous (since there is an R754 ambiguity in meaning).
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: hello world
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: Context for the newcomers: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1260 http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1261 I would normally have complained about explaining jokes being unfunny, but even though I was aware of AGAINT being a thing, I did not know about the original CFJs, and so they were quite a good read. As a side note: users of Yubnub http://yubnub.org/ can now use the command cfj 1885 to get to http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1885. -- Noé Rubinstein
DIS: Re: BUS: hello world
On 25 June 2012 21:24, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: Arguments: In context, I consider here I go a reasonably unambiguous equivalent of I become a player. Arguments: In my opinion, this is really stretching our leniency with registration requests to breaking point, especially since its author was clearly aiming for ambiguity.
