Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why Reclock If Using Low Jitter DAC

2009-06-06 Thread sxr71

Phil Leigh;427831 Wrote: 
 I agree with Newbuyer, but I'd point out that an A/B dealer demo is
 absolutely the worst method of choosing (top-end) gear. You need an
 extended home demo. Our brains and our senses  are tuned to identify
 tiny differences - that's what kept the species alive to-date.
 Difference!=better. Difference=different. You can easily detect
 differences in an A/B of some gear. Only by living with the gear over
 time can you decide if it really is better to your taste.


Totally agree with that and is the reason why I don't believe ABX
testing really works as well as some people believe.


-- 
sxr71

sxr71's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18773
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63796

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Focal Dome speakers - any thoughts?

2009-06-06 Thread Robin Bowes
sxr71 wrote:
 My honest thoughts on surround sound is that it is served just fine with
 a cheap home theater in a box setup. Put your good money into 2 channel.
 
 I don't need a $1000 speaker to reproduce the sound of a chainsaw
 behind me or something. I realize this is pretty dismissive stance on
 cinema sound but sound effects don't need nice speakers.

Actually, *good* sound effects *do* need nice speakers. There's a lot 
more complexity and energy in the soundtrack of an action movie than in 
most music.

There's a reason that there is a specification for Thx: 
http://www.thx.com/studio/specs.html

R.
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why Reclock If Using Low Jitter DAC

2009-06-06 Thread darrenyeats

sxr71;429729 Wrote: 
 Totally agree with that and is the reason why I don't believe ABX
 testing really works as well as some people believe.
ABX is intended to discover if a listener can detect a difference
between A and B. If so it says nothing about which is the listener's
preference.
AB testing is intended to discover the listener's preference between A
and B. It says nothing about which is better for other listeners i.e.
the result is subjective.
Most objections I've read to ABX and AB are not fundamental objections.
They're about how particular tests are carried out in practice, for
example the structure or length of the listening sessions. (Doing a
long-term AB(X) isn't impossible, just difficult.)
Darren


-- 
darrenyeats

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/richpub/listmania/byauthor/A3H57URKQB8AQO/ref=cm_pdp_content_listmania/203-7606506-5721503.

(Inguz bass EQ'd) SB3 - (pre bypassed) Krell KAV-300i - PMC AB-1
(caps bass EQ'd) Laptop - Genius Slab SW-flat2.1 700
SB3 / Rio Karma / Laptop - Roberts Sound 43 / Sennheiser PX-100 / JVC
UX-C30

darrenyeats's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10799
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63796

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Which headphones?

2009-06-06 Thread skahde

Labarum;426070 Wrote: 
 Searching for the Beyer DT770 seems to bring up a wide range of prices
 and a variety of different versions.

Speaking of Beyerdynamic and AKG I had the oppurtunity to compare the
AKG K701, Denon DH2000 and Beyerdynamic DT990, DT880 and DT770. It is
certainly a matter of taste but I found the DT880 to be closest to
neutral with not overempasiszing either end of the range and very nice
detail. It's reproduction of voices is stunning. DT990 and more so DT770
emphasize lows and highs which may or may be not what you are looking
for.

I can recommend to listen to more than just one headphone as this
wasn't quite what I expected. I nearly ordered an AKG701 before I had
the hance to compare it to the Beyers and the Denon (which didn't
impress me much).

best

Stefan


-- 
skahde

skahde's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=30676
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63677

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter to pre- or poweramp

2009-06-06 Thread egd


A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64028

Question: To what is your Transporter connected

- Preamp
- Poweramp


Ok, I've done quite a bit of listening today substituting my SCA2 with
Endler 12-step balanced attenuators.  Bottom line is they sound equally
good to me, so my recommendation to anyone looking at a single-input
music setup is not to bother with a preamp, get/ make yourself some
decent attenuators and you're done (at a tiny fraction of the cost).

@cliveb: how far are you able to turn down the volume via SC before
experiencing noticeable degradation?


-- 
egd

Internet forums: conclusive proof depth of gene pool is indeed variable,
monkeys can be taught to cut code, and world peace is utterly
unrealistic...

Integrating MusicIP with SqueezeCenter...'*here's how*'
(http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/Integrating_MusicIP_with_SqueezeCenter).

egd's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3425
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64028

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter to pre- or poweramp

2009-06-06 Thread iwalker


A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64028

Question: To what is your Transporter connected

- Preamp
- Poweramp


Thanks.That seems to confirm Clive B's view- i.e. no preamp is ideal,
but the SCA 2 is so good, it is unlikely to have any audible
'signature'.
I feel vindicated in adopting a minimalist approach.
I use Rothwell fixed attenuators and currently  have only a single
source, which is the TP. I may add TV/DVD, but think I can get away with
using the TP for this, so shouldn't need a preamp..?
I have now replaced most albums with CDs,so it will be difficult to
justify the cost of an SCA2 ( with phono stage), and a respectable
turntable.
There's probably no going back now, even though it would be nice to
hear some of the old vinyl and find out if it really is 'better' than
CD.
The vinyl will probably stay in boxes for another 10 years. That's the
price of progress!


-- 
iwalker

iwalker's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13004
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64028

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles