Re: Cisco VS Foundry Networks.. [7:36448]
Foundry makes great products! On product in particular that blows Cisco away is their ServerIron Load Balancers. Cisco made a big mistake by buying Arrowpoint, and badging them the CSS line of equipment. As far as Foundry's switches go, they are very comparable. They use a Cisco replica command set, so if you know Cisco, you can adapt to Foundry fairly easily. So all in all, Foundry is a good product, worth consideration for a lot of different applications. - Original Message - From: "Washington Rico" To: Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:02 PM Subject: Cisco VS Foundry Networks.. [7:36448] > Cisco people I would like to know your impression of Foundry Networks. Are > they something to worry about? > > Regards, > Eric Washington > > _ > $B$+$o(B & > $B;H$($k%V%i%&%6$G!"%$%s%?! http://explorer.msn.co.jp/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36477&t=36448 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco VS Foundry Networks.. [7:36448]
Foundry makes great products! On product in particular that blows Cisco away is their ServerIron Load Balancers. Cisco made a big mistake by buying Arrowpoint, and badging them the CSS line of equipment. As far as Foundry's switches go, they are very comparable. They use a Cisco replica command set, so if you know Cisco, you can adapt to Foundry fairly easily. So all in all, Foundry is a good product, worth consideration for a lot of different applications. - Original Message - From: "Washington Rico" To: Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:02 PM Subject: Cisco VS Foundry Networks.. [7:36448] > Cisco people I would like to know your impression of Foundry Networks. Are > they something to worry about? > > Regards, > Eric Washington > > _ > $B$+$o(B & > $B;H$($k%V%i%&%6$G!"%$%s%?! http://explorer.msn.co.jp/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36477&t=36448 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***SWITCH CONSOLE COMMAND*** [7:56849]
Hello all, When repairing a failed flash in 6509 w/MSFC I had to use the switch console command to be able to set up the boot boot variable for the router since the flash was replaced. I do not have physical access to these boxes on a daily basis but I can reach them via a console server or SSH. Problem is that when I use the console server to get to it it goes directly to the MSFC because during the repair I used the switch console command, I want to switch the console port back to the switch Supervisor but here is what it tells me. SWITCH> (enable) switch console This command is not supported on telnet session OK, if the command is not allowed on a telnet (SSH) session then how do you switch the console port back since I can't "console" into the Supervisor? Seem crazy to be only able to switch it from the console, but the console only works for the MSFC. Thanks!!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56849&t=56849 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ***SWITCH CONSOLE COMMAND*** [7:56850]
Nevermind...I found it... TAC's new website is nice, but takes some getting used to. Ctrl-C x 3. LOL.. - Original Message - From: r34rv13wm1rr0r To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: ***SWITCH CONSOLE COMMAND*** Hello all, When repairing a failed flash in 6509 w/MSFC I had to use the switch console command to be able to set up the boot boot variable for the router since the flash was replaced. I do not have physical access to these boxes on a daily basis but I can reach them via a console server or SSH. Problem is that when I use the console server to get to it it goes directly to the MSFC because during the repair I used the switch console command, I want to switch the console port back to the switch Supervisor but here is what it tells me. SWITCH> (enable) switch console This command is not supported on telnet session OK, if the command is not allowed on a telnet (SSH) session then how do you switch the console port back since I can't "console" into the Supervisor? Seem crazy to be only able to switch it from the console, but the console only works for the MSFC. Thanks!!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56850&t=56850 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Telephony Questions [7:57293]
Hello, I am trying to put together a case study pertaining to Cisco Telephony, if any of you experience with this subject matter would respond I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks. 1. Does Cisco use IP Telephony? If so, how? 2. What are the major business capabilities to Cisco that are achieved by using IP Telephony? i.e. increased productivity, lower long distance costs 3. What are the advantages of using IP Telephony over traditional voice systems? i.e. shared network/phone equipment, support costs, more features (if so, what) 4. What are the disadvantages of using IP Telephony? i.e. network congestion causing latency 5. How does it perform over Frame Relay? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57293&t=57293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Has Anyone used Global Knowledge? [7:57297]
I used the one in Dallas for Advance BGP, great course and the receptionist was hot. - Original Message - From: "David Vital" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:16 AM Subject: Has Anyone used Global Knowledge? [7:57297] > Wondering if anyone here has experience with Global Knowledge and the > classes they offer. > > Thanks, > > David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57309&t=57297 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PC-Card Flash Question [7:48619]
Is there any way to copy images to the PC-Card based Flash using a laptop, either with a special card reader or using software and the PC-Card slot on a laptop? I am just curious if I could copy IOS images for distribution to the Flash card using my laptop then take card to the devices and load IOS version. (In situations where TFTP isn't feasible or the best option.) Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48619&t=48619 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Check this new command out [7:49717]
Your "do" command is this router(config)#downward-compatible-config ? . Version number router(config)#downward-compatible-config - Original Message - From: "Moffett, Ryan" To: Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 10:46 AM Subject: RE: Check this new command out [7:49717] > I have the "do" command in config mode (in c3640-i-mz.122-5d.bin), but the > output is only: > > router(config)#do ? > . Version number > > -Original Message- > From: Dan Penn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 11:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Check this new command out [7:49717] > > > Yes, I'm not sure what platforms it does work on, I tried it on 2500's, > 2600's and 4500's with no luck > > Dan > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > MADMAN > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 8:16 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Check this new command out [7:49717] > > Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > > > MADMAN wrote: > > > > > > Thought this was pretty cool!! > > > > > > c7304(config)#do sh ver > > > > Cool! Can you do stuff other than show version while in config mode?? > > > > Yes it appears you can do most anything, I tried a sh mem, sh config | > inclu, sh ip route, they all work. I don't know when/if this will be > available in released IOS, I tried it on a 7200 running the latest 12.2.10a, > no cigar. > > Dave > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49798&t=49717 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: flash copy failed checksum error [7:51834]
It is also possible that your bootflash is faulty, as I have just had one go bad in a 6509. 1 out of 3 times it would actually verity the CatOS images OK, most times it would say bad CRC checksum and I tried different downloads and TFTP servers to make sure the images was fine. Cisco RMA'd a new flash and now it is as good as new Anthony - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 10:38 AM Subject: RE: flash copy failed checksum error [7:51834] > McHugh, > > Have you tried to redownload the IOS image and verify you have the correct > checksum (MD5) ? > It is possible the IOS you have is now does not have good integrity. > > > Regards, > Leonard Ong, CISSP, CSS-1, CCSE, MCSE, > MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, NSA, LCP > Network Security Specialist, APAC > NOKIA > > Email. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mobile. +65 9431 6184 > Phone. +65 6723 1724 > Fax.+65 6723 1596 > > > > -Original Message- > From: ext McHugh Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 10:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: flash copy failed checksum error [7:51834] > > > I got a checksum error - invalid (expected 0x3e75,computed 0x194) when > upgrading an IOS on 2524 from 11.2 to 12.2. I have tried it several times > before with the same results. Anyone know a fix for that? I have 15.x file > with 16mg flash and 16mg dram so that should be enough dram and flash to > hold the image. > thx > Randy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51846&t=51834 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MLS between 2 Cat5K with RSM [7:51841]
If I am not mistaken, and forgive me if I am since it has been a while since I worked with a 5k/RSM setup. I believe that you only need to incorporate the MLS IP RP stuff if you are in the "Router on a Stick" configuration meaning if you have a some 72xx or 75xx's out there doing your VLAN routing. Being that your RSM is incorporated into the switch you should do some sh mls xxx on your switch to see that MLS should be running by default, and there is no need to apply that configuration. I know for a fact this is true on the 65xx platform, but I am sure it also applies to 55xx/RSM also. 16 RP addresses would be external routers ONLY. Good Luck, Anthony - Original Message - From: "Ken Diliberto" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 10:50 AM Subject: MLS between 2 Cat5K with RSM [7:51841] > I finished reading a CCO document on configuring MLS on the Cat5K this > morning and one big question (well, at least one) remains: > > If I'm using 2 Cat5K switches with dual RSMs each connected with a > trunk, do I have to identify each RSM as an MLS IP RP to each switch to > MLS between switches? Do I need to identify each VLAN routing interface > as an MLS IP RP? The documentation states you can specify up to 16 RP > addresses but we've got more. > > Thanks. > > Ken Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51856&t=51841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A HUB can work in Full-duplex mode? [7:52973]
No. The collision domain on a hub is shared throughout causing each port to listen before transmitting. A switch on the other had limits the collision domains by port therefore allowing the host to transmit at will. - Original Message - From: "Saravanan L" To: Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 2:59 AM Subject: A HUB can work in Full-duplex mode? [7:52973] > Just I want to know can a Hub work in full-duplex mode? > > Saravanan > *** > This message is proprietary to Future Software Limited (FSL) > and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it > is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information > and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for > what it is intended. > > If you have received this message in error, please notify the > originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, > you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, > copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. > FSL accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from > the use of the information transmitted by this email including > damage from virus. > *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52979&t=52973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Duplicate packets with same SEQ #'s... [7:53024]
This is from a tcpdump off of one of my core switches. It appears that it is logging a duplicate packet with the same SEQ #. Does any one have any idea why this is occuring? Thanks, A 11:18:04.688408 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P 1:65(64) ack 49 win 8320NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.688409 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P 1:65(64) ack 49 win 8320NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.688643 172.X.103.10.netbios-ssn > 172.X.15.15.1503: P 158405518:158405625(107) ack 1210141117 win 8608NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.688644 172.X.103.10.netbios-ssn > 172.X.15.15.1503: P 0:107(107) ack 1 win 8608NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.688645 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P 65:119(54) ack 98 win 8271NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.688646 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P 65:119(54) ack 98 win 8271NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.63 X.X.6.3.http > 172.X.14.50.1123: . ack 4294967295 win 8155 (DF) 11:18:04.65 X.X.6.3.http > 172.X.14.50.1123: . ack 4294967295 win 8155 (DF) 11:18:04.66 172.23.27.10.3021 > 172.X.15.10.netbios-ssn: P 3194256684:3194256844(160) ack 95965178 win 7515NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.67 172.23.27.10.3021 > 172.X.15.10.netbios-ssn: P 0:160(160) ack 1 win 7515NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.68 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P 119:173(54) ack 147 win 8222NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.69 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P 119:173(54) ack 147 win 8222NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.688890 172.X.15.15.1503 > 172.X.103.10.netbios-ssn: P 1:161(160) ack 107 win 7996NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.688891 172.X.15.15.1503 > 172.X.103.10.netbios-ssn: P 1:161(160) ack 107 win 7996NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.689183 172.X.15.10.netbios-ssn > 172.23.27.10.3021: P 1:129(128) ack 160 win 8138NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.689185 172.X.15.10.netbios-ssn > 172.23.27.10.3021: P 1:129(128) ack 160 win 8138NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.689186 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P 173:255(82) ack 196 win 8173NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.689187 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P 173:255(82) ack 196 win 8173NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.689188 172.X.15.151.ssh > 172.X.53.186.1219: P 2849560709:2849560801(92) ack 2980294350 win 9648 (DF) [tos 0x10] 11:18:04.689189 172.X.15.151.ssh > 172.X.53.186.1219: P 0:92(92) ack 1 win 9648 (DF) [tos 0x10] 11:18:04.689192 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P 255:309(54) ack 245 win 8124NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.689193 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P 255:309(54) ack 245 win 8124NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.689608 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P 309:363(54) ack 294 win 8075NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.689609 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P 309:363(54) ack 294 win 8075NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.689610 172.X.243.6.printer > 172.X.240.10.723: . ack 4096314569 win 2144 11:18:04.689610 172.X.243.6.printer > 172.X.240.10.723: . ack 1 win 2144 11:18:04.689611 172.X.53.186.1219 > 172.X.15.151.ssh: P 1:45(44) ack 92 win 16724 (DF) 11:18:04.689612 172.X.53.186.1219 > 172.X.15.151.ssh: P 1:45(44) ack 92 win 16724 (DF) 11:18:04.689614 172.X.61.103.1066 > 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn: P 294:343(49) ack 363 win 7380NBT Packet (DF) [tos 0x4] 11:18:04.718183 172.X.61.103.1066 > 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn: P 6762:6811(49) ack 8223 win 8397NBT Packet (DF) [tos 0x4] 11:18:04.718187 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P 8223:8287(64) ack 6811 win 7438NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.718188 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P 8223:8287(64) ack 6811 win 7438NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.718423 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P 8287:8341(54) ack 6860 win 7389NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.718424 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P 8287:8341(54) ack 6860 win 7389NBT Packet (DF) 11:18:04.718425 172.X.240.220.6103 > 172.X.15.68.4720: . 2920:4380(1460) ack 1 win 16816 (DF) 11:18:04.718586 172.X.240.220.6103 > 172.X.15.68.4720: . 4380:5840(1460) ack 1 win 16816 (DF) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53024&t=53024 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Duplicate packets with same SEQ #'s... [7:53024]
The tcpdump is being run on a gig span port on the core 6509, the only vlan's the span encompasses is the Server VLAN's. The VLAN's are being spanned on both core switches, so I can see why in the intrusion database duplicates are showing up since both servers are seeing the same VLAN's. I wonder why when TCPDUMP is run on once switch it sees duplicates. Like I said, I can see why the ACID database sees two entries if both servers are set on the same spanned VLAN's, but it does explain why the duplicates are notice when tcpdump is running on only one Linux Server. The host that is running tcpdump is only using 1 gigabit NIC, so no chance of seeing the packets from another interface. I guess it isn't that big of a deal, I just want to find out why it is happening, the Security folks are a litle annoyed with getting two entries in the database every time. I will evaluate spanning-tree and what not, but it seems there is some deep rooted explanation for this. Thanks for all of your replies... keep 'em coming! Antonio - Original Message - From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" To: Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 4:36 PM Subject: RE: Duplicate packets with same SEQ #'s... [7:53024] > Where are you running this TCPdump? It seems to be somewhere on the network > where it sees every packet twice. It's not just SEQ#s that are repeating, > but ACKs, etc. > > Could the host that is running TCPdump be multihomed? > > Obviously, in a functioning network, it would be pretty bizarre for any LAN > or host to see the same packet twice. Spanning Tree and routing protocols > should ensure that this doesn't happen. But there may be situations where > this is normal, for a station that is just doing network management type > tasks, for example. > > Priscilla > > r34rv13wm1rr0r wrote: > > > > This is from a tcpdump off of one of my core switches. It > > appears that it is > > logging a duplicate packet with the same SEQ #. Does any one > > have any idea > > why this is occuring? > > > > Thanks, > > > > A > > > > 11:18:04.688408 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P > > 1:65(64) ack 49 > > win 8320NBT Packet (DF) > > 11:18:04.688409 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P > > 1:65(64) ack 49 > > win 8320NBT Packet (DF) > > > > 11:18:04.688643 172.X.103.10.netbios-ssn > 172.X.15.15.1503: P > > 158405518:158405625(107) ack 1210141117 win 8608NBT Packet (DF) > > 11:18:04.688644 172.X.103.10.netbios-ssn > 172.X.15.15.1503: P > > 0:107(107) ack > > 1 win 8608NBT Packet (DF) > > > > 11:18:04.688645 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P > > 65:119(54) ack > > 98 win 8271NBT Packet (DF) > > 11:18:04.688646 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P > > 65:119(54) ack > > 98 win 8271NBT Packet (DF) > > > > 11:18:04.63 X.X.6.3.http > 172.X.14.50.1123: . ack > > 4294967295 win 8155 > > (DF) > > 11:18:04.65 X.X.6.3.http > 172.X.14.50.1123: . ack > > 4294967295 win 8155 > > (DF) > > > > 11:18:04.66 172.23.27.10.3021 > 172.X.15.10.netbios-ssn: P > > 3194256684:3194256844(160) ack 95965178 win 7515NBT Packet (DF) > > 11:18:04.67 172.23.27.10.3021 > 172.X.15.10.netbios-ssn: P > > 0:160(160) ack > > 1 win 7515NBT Packet (DF) > > > > 11:18:04.68 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P > > 119:173(54) ack > > 147 win 8222NBT Packet (DF) > > 11:18:04.69 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P > > 119:173(54) ack > > 147 win 8222NBT Packet (DF) > > > > 11:18:04.688890 172.X.15.15.1503 > 172.X.103.10.netbios-ssn: P > > 1:161(160) ack > > 107 win 7996NBT Packet (DF) > > 11:18:04.688891 172.X.15.15.1503 > 172.X.103.10.netbios-ssn: P > > 1:161(160) ack > > 107 win 7996NBT Packet (DF) > > > > 11:18:04.689183 172.X.15.10.netbios-ssn > 172.23.27.10.3021: P > > 1:129(128) ack > > 160 win 8138NBT Packet (DF) > > 11:18:04.689185 172.X.15.10.netbios-ssn > 172.23.27.10.3021: P > > 1:129(128) ack > > 160 win 8138NBT Packet (DF) > > > > 11:18:04.689186 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P > > 173:255(82) ack > > 196 win 8173NBT Packet (DF) > > 11:18:04.689187 172.X.15.49.netbios-ssn > 172.X.61.103.1066: P > > 173:255(82) ack > > 196 win 8173NBT Packet (DF) > > > > 11:18:04.689188 172.X.15.151.ssh > 172.X.53.186.1219: P > > 2849560709:2849560801(92) ack 2980294350 win 9648 (DF) [tos > > 0x10] > > 11:18:04.689189 172.X.15.151.ssh > 172.X.53.186.1219: P > >
Switch MAC filter [7:54880]
Is there a way on a 6509 to filter a port from seeing a traffic from a cetain MAC when the two hosts are on the same VLAN. The problem is one host keeps broadcasting NTP updates every 40 secs and the Pix SYSLOG is contantly logging it. Since the NTP host does not go through the firewall I was wondering if I could block the MAC address all together at the port the Pix is plugged into. Thanks.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54880&t=54880 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which IOS version has the DHCP server software? [7:55102]
Which IOS release has the DHCP server software? It is for a 25xx router. IP IP PLUS IP ENTERPRISE IP SP Thanks... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55102&t=55102 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
