Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
The EOL URL referenced below is, in my opinion, one of the most incomplete "lists" on CCO. Use it as a starting point by all means, but don't rely on it to cover everything that has been EOL'd, because it doesn't. (Actually, it appears to be a little more complete now than it used to be - but it's still pretty hopeless). JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 29/04/2002 09:03 am - "[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)" http://www.cisco.com/go/eol/ . } Same with 3500s and 3550 (well the 3500's do have GBICs slots available, but The last of the 3500XLs will be discontinued on July 27th, 2002. }-- End of excerpt from "Michael L. Williams" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42801&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
Jeez John I can't wait to "know" everything like you!! Dave "[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)" wrote: > On Sep 16, 1:23pm, "Michael L. Williams" wrote: > } > } I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted, however, I know Cisco is > > What you think is irrelevant! The last of the 2900XL series were > discontinued on Nov. 1st, 2001. Next time, instead of "think"ing, go > look at http://www.cisco.com/go/eol/ . > > } Same with 3500s and 3550 (well the 3500's do have GBICs slots available, > but > > The last of the 3500XLs will be discontinued on July 27th, 2002. > > }-- End of excerpt from "Michael L. Williams" -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications Inc. 612-664-3367 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42728&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
Michael L. Williams wrote: > no one can no everything And yes, after posting I realized that I misspelled "no" in the above sentence. I wanted to make it known that I made a mistake before Mr. Nemeth had a chance to chime in with a standard "yeah, well, learn how to spell..." posts. Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42724&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
First off, let me "pre-apologize" for my following statements to everyone in this group except Mr. Know It All (John Nemeth)... The following is slightly unprofessional, but well deserved. "[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What you think is irrelevant! Geez... what an ass! That notwithstanding, I would beg to differ. Quite possibly, the biggest part of participating in this group is to find out what people "think". > The last of the 2900XL series were discontinued on Nov. 1st, 2001. Given the information below, apparently we should disregard what you "think" you "know" even after you "thought" you had all of the facts. The fact is, no one can no everything, and until one knows everything, anything that one might say is no more than "thought", speculation and conjecture. So why don't you lighten up, eh? At least I realize my abilities as a "mere mortal" enough to qualify my statements with "I think ..." instead of attempting to belittle people (which you obviously tried to do) whilst being convinced that all information that you may spew forth is absolutely correct (which was obviously what you thought). (Just so you know, I searched the EOL page for the 3 models of switches listed below and they are indeed not there. So "it would appear" ( Hold on. Not all of the 2900XL's have been discontinued > > "...This announcement does NOT affect the Modular Configuration of the > Catalyst 2900 Series XL (WS-C2924M-XL-EN, WS-C2924M-XL-EN-DC, WS-C2912MF-XL) > or the Expansion Modules (WS-X2914-XL-V, WS-X2922-XL-V, WS-X2924-XL-V, > WS-X2931-XL, WS-X2932-XL, WS-X2951-XL, WS-X2961-XL, WS-X2971-XL, > WS-X2972-XL) for this platform. These products will continue to be > manufactured, sold and supported by Cisco until further notice" > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca2900xl/prodlit/1421_pp.htm Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42718&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
""[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On Sep 16, 1:23pm, "Michael L. Williams" wrote: > } > } I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted, however, I know Cisco is > > What you think is irrelevant! The last of the 2900XL series were > discontinued on Nov. 1st, 2001. Next time, instead of "think"ing, go > look at http://www.cisco.com/go/eol/ . Hold on. Not all of the 2900XL's have been discontinued "...This announcement does NOT affect the Modular Configuration of the Catalyst 2900 Series XL (WS-C2924M-XL-EN, WS-C2924M-XL-EN-DC, WS-C2912MF-XL) or the Expansion Modules (WS-X2914-XL-V, WS-X2922-XL-V, WS-X2924-XL-V, WS-X2931-XL, WS-X2932-XL, WS-X2951-XL, WS-X2961-XL, WS-X2971-XL, WS-X2972-XL) for this platform. These products will continue to be manufactured, sold and supported by Cisco until further notice" http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca2900xl/prodlit/1421_pp.htm > > } Same with 3500s and 3550 (well the 3500's do have GBICs slots available, > but > > The last of the 3500XLs will be discontinued on July 27th, 2002. > > }-- End of excerpt from "Michael L. Williams" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42715&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
They are in the process of disco'ing the 2900 series but they have already come out with its successor - the 2950 series. (they also have the 3550 series as well). http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/ca2950ie.htm Adam Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Marko Milivojevic" To: Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:29 PM Subject: RE: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687] > > Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, > > what are other > > good alternatives for the 2900XL series? > > 3500XL > > Marko. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42711&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
Another thing to consider about the 2950's, which may or may not be important to you, is they do not support ISL. -Ed At 06:47 PM 4/26/2002 -0400, Michael L. Williams wrote: >I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted, however, I know Cisco is >pushing the 2950 series is a "newer" alternative The 2950s feature Gig >uplinks and 2900s don't >Same with 3500s and 3550 (well the 3500's do have GBICs slots available, but >I mean the same as far as Cisco pushing them as a "newer" alternative). >Cisco seems to be favoring the 3550s. I recall checking the backplane on >them and the 3550 was about twice that of the 2950 (10Gbps -vs- ~5Gbps)... >but if you get the 48 port model and run clients at 100Mbps, then even the >2950 backplane should do you right If memory serves, The two of the >2950s (48 port) maybe close or slightly above your $4k budget. two >3550s (48 port) would be well over the $4k budget. Either way, if you want >to use the GBICs, you'll have to buy those, but if it's only those two >switches, you could either stack or trunk them over the Gig (I think you >could even use both gig ports on each switch and do a 2Gbps Etherchannel, >but don't quote me on that) > >Mike W. > >"Mayo, Simer" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, what are other > > good alternatives for the 2900XL series? > > > > I have a client with a small network about 100 users. At present the > > internal network is @ 10MB/s and will be upgrading to 100MB/s. There are 2 > > file servers, 2 app servers and users do big CAD file transfers. The >budget > > for switches is around $4K. > > The plan is to move the users in 2 differ VLANs depending upong their > > departments and have a 80/20 rule for the traffic. > > > > Thanks > > > > Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42710&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
the 2950 series has somewhat replaced the 2924xl. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Marko Milivojevic" To: Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:29 PM Subject: RE: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687] > > Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, > > what are other > > good alternatives for the 2900XL series? > > 3500XL > > Marko. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42709&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
On Sep 16, 1:23pm, "Michael L. Williams" wrote: } } I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted, however, I know Cisco is What you think is irrelevant! The last of the 2900XL series were discontinued on Nov. 1st, 2001. Next time, instead of "think"ing, go look at http://www.cisco.com/go/eol/ . } Same with 3500s and 3550 (well the 3500's do have GBICs slots available, but The last of the 3500XLs will be discontinued on July 27th, 2002. }-- End of excerpt from "Michael L. Williams" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42708&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > 2950 XL replaced 2900 and 3550 XL replaced 3500. The 2900 and 3500's got > EOL'd . There is no such thing as a 2950XL or a 3550XL. The 'XL' designation only exists for the 2900 and the 3500. > > -- > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > Get in my head: > http://sar.dynu.com > > > ""Mayo, Simer"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, what are other > > good alternatives for the 2900XL series? > > > > I have a client with a small network about 100 users. At present the > > internal network is @ 10MB/s and will be upgrading to 100MB/s. There are 2 > > file servers, 2 app servers and users do big CAD file transfers. The > budget > > for switches is around $4K. > > The plan is to move the users in 2 differ VLANs depending upong their > > departments and have a 80/20 rule for the traffic. > > > > Thanks > > > > Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42705&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
""Marko Milivojevic"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, > > what are other > > good alternatives for the 2900XL series? > > 3500XL Uh, are you sure? http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca3500xl/ > > Marko. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42706&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
Inline ""Michael L. Williams"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted, The fixed-config ones have absolutely been discontinued http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca2900xl/prodlit/1421_pp.htm >however, I know Cisco is > pushing the 2950 series is a "newer" alternative The 2950s feature Gig > uplinks and 2900s don't > Same with 3500s Not dead yet, but close: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca3500xl/ >and 3550 (well the 3500's do have GBICs slots available, but > I mean the same as far as Cisco pushing them as a "newer" alternative). > Cisco seems to be favoring the 3550s. I recall checking the backplane on > them and the 3550 was about twice that of the 2950 (10Gbps -vs- ~5Gbps)... > but if you get the 48 port model and run clients at 100Mbps, then even the > 2950 backplane should do you right If memory serves, The two of the > 2950s (48 port) maybe close or slightly above your $4k budget. two > 3550s (48 port) would be well over the $4k budget. Either way, if you want > to use the GBICs, you'll have to buy those, but if it's only those two > switches, you could either stack or trunk them over the Gig (I think you > could even use both gig ports on each switch and do a 2Gbps Etherchannel, > but don't quote me on that) > > Mike W. > > "Mayo, Simer" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, what are other > > good alternatives for the 2900XL series? > > > > I have a client with a small network about 100 users. At present the > > internal network is @ 10MB/s and will be upgrading to 100MB/s. There are 2 > > file servers, 2 app servers and users do big CAD file transfers. The > budget > > for switches is around $4K. > > The plan is to move the users in 2 differ VLANs depending upong their > > departments and have a 80/20 rule for the traffic. > > > > Thanks > > > > Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42703&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted, however, I know Cisco is pushing the 2950 series is a "newer" alternative The 2950s feature Gig uplinks and 2900s don't Same with 3500s and 3550 (well the 3500's do have GBICs slots available, but I mean the same as far as Cisco pushing them as a "newer" alternative). Cisco seems to be favoring the 3550s. I recall checking the backplane on them and the 3550 was about twice that of the 2950 (10Gbps -vs- ~5Gbps)... but if you get the 48 port model and run clients at 100Mbps, then even the 2950 backplane should do you right If memory serves, The two of the 2950s (48 port) maybe close or slightly above your $4k budget. two 3550s (48 port) would be well over the $4k budget. Either way, if you want to use the GBICs, you'll have to buy those, but if it's only those two switches, you could either stack or trunk them over the Gig (I think you could even use both gig ports on each switch and do a 2Gbps Etherchannel, but don't quote me on that) Mike W. "Mayo, Simer" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, what are other > good alternatives for the 2900XL series? > > I have a client with a small network about 100 users. At present the > internal network is @ 10MB/s and will be upgrading to 100MB/s. There are 2 > file servers, 2 app servers and users do big CAD file transfers. The budget > for switches is around $4K. > The plan is to move the users in 2 differ VLANs depending upong their > departments and have a 80/20 rule for the traffic. > > Thanks > > Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42699&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
2950 XL replaced 2900 and 3550 XL replaced 3500. The 2900 and 3500's got EOL'd . -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com ""Mayo, Simer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, what are other > good alternatives for the 2900XL series? > > I have a client with a small network about 100 users. At present the > internal network is @ 10MB/s and will be upgrading to 100MB/s. There are 2 > file servers, 2 app servers and users do big CAD file transfers. The budget > for switches is around $4K. > The plan is to move the users in 2 differ VLANs depending upong their > departments and have a 80/20 rule for the traffic. > > Thanks > > Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42698&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
> Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, > what are other > good alternatives for the 2900XL series? 3500XL Marko. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42693&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, what are other good alternatives for the 2900XL series? I have a client with a small network about 100 users. At present the internal network is @ 10MB/s and will be upgrading to 100MB/s. There are 2 file servers, 2 app servers and users do big CAD file transfers. The budget for switches is around $4K. The plan is to move the users in 2 differ VLANs depending upong their departments and have a 80/20 rule for the traffic. Thanks Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42687&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
