[Cooker] Here is the sound fix for via686a
Ok I've managed to find a way for sound to work properly, the kcontrol information to be correct and the arts daemon to not conflict with the via 82cxxx ac97 sound card. Please do this by default for any installation as sound will never work properly on this card otherwise. Install alsa instead of the oss/lite modules edit the modules.conf file correctly # ALSA native device support alias char-major-116 snd options snd snd_major=116 snd_cards_limit=1 alias snd-card-0 snd-card-via686a # OSS/Free setup alias char-major-14 soundcore alias sound-slot-0 snd-card-0 alias sound-service-0-0 snd-mixer-oss alias sound-service-0-1 snd-seq-oss alias sound-service-0-3 snd-pcm-oss alias sound-service-0-8 snd-seq-oss alias sound-service-0-12 snd-pcm-oss then start the arts daemon (artsd) with the -r 48000 option to reflect the proper sample rate playback. If you don't want to include the alsa drivers by default then even with the -r 48000 option the arts daemon will fail. The other problems will be that all x-apps and the esd will playback sounds at higher pitch (44100 sample rates played at 48000) and kcontrol will not be able to recognise the sound information. Sound will only work sporadically. Please do this by default on installation as there are many of these motherboards around now. Con _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.
Re: [Cooker] reiserfs.o
Compile your own kernel. Yes, I know it sounds daunting, but the whole process is well documented (see the README). Remember to patch your kernel using this command: zcat linuxreiserfs.gz | patch -P0. get the linux kernel 2.4test9 at www.kernel.org get the linux reiserfs 2.4test9 patch at www.reiserfs.org ... and whatever you do, DON'T skip a step in the README. ZE On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Mike & Tracy Holt wrote: > Hello cooker, > Using mdk 7.2 rc 1 with reiserfs, I decided to upgrade to the latest > hackkernel (2.4.0-0.35mdk) using rpm -Uvh and then following the > instructions on your website for people using reiser file system, I > installed the stock kernel via rpm -i and then did the depmod -a, etc, etc. > I tried to mkinitrd and got the message "no reiserfs module found". Any > ideas? > > TIA, Mike > > > ^^ < Zach Etienne > < UITS Student Technology Consulting > < Indiana University Bloomington, IN > < Computer Consultant, Graphic Zone Labs> -- There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: the fashionable non-conformist. --Ayn Rand vv
[Cooker] reiserfs.o
Hello cooker, Using mdk 7.2 rc 1 with reiserfs, I decided to upgrade to the latest hackkernel (2.4.0-0.35mdk) using rpm -Uvh and then following the instructions on your website for people using reiser file system, I installed the stock kernel via rpm -i and then did the depmod -a, etc, etc. I tried to mkinitrd and got the message "no reiserfs module found". Any ideas? TIA, Mike
Re: [Cooker] reiserfs? anyone?
from the quill of Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Yes, no problems here with 2.2.17-21mdk. Am using it since ~1yr. > Never had > any troubles at all. Lots of people seem to be using it no problem. Anyone on the hackkernel? b. -- Brian J. Murrell
Re: [Cooker] Kdevelop in 7.2?
You might be better of waiting until Kdevelop2 is released. It should be released at about the same time as KDE2. However, I did find an rpm for Kdevelop2 for the SUSE 7 distribution. I have not seen any source rpms though. Please let me know if you have any luck with this. Also, has anybody here had succes with getting KDE Studio to work. I keep getting dependency errors and asking for a kde-addon library. Mark
Re: [Cooker] Kdevelop in 7.2?
> "A" == Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: A> Is it possible to use kdevelop 1.2 and the package kde1-compat A> ? If it is, I have not found a way. In fact, I haven't tried RC1, but I have yet to find any non-trivial program which _will_ run under the kde1-compat libraries. -- Gary Lawrence Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: office voice/fax: 01 519 4222723 T(C)Inc Business Innovations through Open Source http://www.teledyn.com M:I-3 - Documenting the Linux kernel: http://kernelbook.sourceforge.net
Re: [Cooker] reiserfs? anyone?
Anyone on the list using reiser with NFS? It's really sketchy from the wreiser website if it's safe to use it with NFS or not. What i know is that ext3 and NFS _are_ compatible. Can't Mandrake include a kernel with ext3 also included? On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Alexander Skwar wrote: > So sprach Brian J. Murrell am Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 08:45:46AM -0700: > > Is anyone successfully using Reiserfs? > > Yes, no problems here with 2.2.17-21mdk. Am using it since ~1yr. Never had > any troubles at all. > > Alexander Skwar > -- > Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx > Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys > ICQ: 7328191 > >
[Cooker] Network install don't work
I've tried to start an network install with the image on network.img, who was DL from ftp.free.fr, dated from October, 19. ftp method, network card found, mdkinst_stage2.gz is downloaded. but I see a litte after: * writing network information to /tmp/ifcfg-eth0 * state saved to /tmp * symlink /tmp/stage2 failed < Pb but It don't look to stop here. some other thinks hapend, ttyS0 and ttyS1 are found, usb, too, and here, problem, with perl-install, who died. on log, I see * warning: Died at /usr/bin/perl-install/ftp.pm line 42 Emmanuel - "Le bon sens, c'est l'autre sens" (Loi de Murphy) [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://manu.agat.net/ B226, Bl. Sebastien Brant, 67400 Illkirch 03 88 65 55 36, University of Strasbourg, France
[Cooker] can run mandrakeupdate or kpackage
Installed glibc-2.1.95-1mdk.i586.rpm as suggested earlier and went well but had messages refering to libnss-dns.so.1. Is there a package I need that corresponds to this. I installed db1, db2, db3 and rpm-4.0-3mdk.i586.rpm. Since then I can run mandrake update or even kpackage as the following error comes up on the screen: usr/bin/update-menus: error whilw loding shared libraries usr/lib/librpm.so.o -- undefined symbol fdio Is there another package I left out or something that I may have done to cause this? Nev
[Cooker] [RPM] librep-0.13.1-2mdk
Hello! I've uploaded this file to ftp.linux-mandrake.com/incoming/. Until it appears at the mirrors, you can download it from ftp://ftp.dp.ath.cx/pub/downloads/RPMS/mandrake, or use the rpm2html database at http://www.dp.ath.cx/rpms --- Name: librep Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 0.13.1Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 2mdk Build Date: Sat Oct 21 00:58:56 2000 Install date: (not installed) Build Host: teich.garten.digitalprojects.com Group : Development/Other Source RPM: (none) Size: 660768 License: GPL Packager: Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL : http://librep.sourceforge.net/ Summary : An embeddable LISP environment Description : This is a lightweight LISP environment for UNIX. It contains a LISP interpreter, byte-code compiler and virtual machine. Applications may use the LISP interpreter as an extension language, or it may be used for standalone scripts. Originally inspired by Emacs Lisp, the language dialect combines many of the elisp features while trying to remove some of the main deficiencies, with features from Common Lisp and Scheme. --- Sat Oct 21 2000 Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.13.1-1mdk - Include rep_config.h -- Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Cooker] [RPM] gmp-3.1-1mdk
Hello! I've uploaded this file to ftp.linux-mandrake.com/incoming/. Until it appears at the mirrors, you can download it from ftp://ftp.dp.ath.cx/pub/downloads/RPMS/mandrake, or use the rpm2html database at http://www.dp.ath.cx/rpms --- Name: gmp Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 3.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk Build Date: Fri Oct 20 20:53:25 2000 Install date: (not installed) Build Host: teich.garten.digitalprojects.com Group : System/Libraries Source RPM: (none) Size: 833570 License: GPL Packager: Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL : http://www.swox.com/gmp/ Summary : A GNU arbitrary precision library. Description : The gmp package contains GNU MP, a library for arbitrary precision arithmetic, signed integers operations, rational numbers and floating point numbers. GNU MP is designed for speed, for both small and very large operands. GNU MP is fast for several reasons: It uses fullwords as the basic arithmetic type, it uses fast algorithms, it carefully optimizes assembly code for many CPUs' most common inner loops and it generally emphasizes speed over simplicity/elegance in its operations. Install the gmp package if you need a fast arbitrary precision library. --- Fri Oct 20 2000 Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3.1-1mdk - Updated to a recent version, ie. 3.1 -- Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Cooker] [RPM] librep-0.13.1-1mdk
Hello! I've uploaded this file to ftp.linux-mandrake.com/incoming/. Until it appears at the mirrors, you can download it from ftp://ftp.dp.ath.cx/pub/downloads/RPMS/mandrake, or use the rpm2html database at http://www.dp.ath.cx/rpms --- Name: librep Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 0.13.1Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk Build Date: Sat Oct 21 00:05:02 2000 Install date: (not installed) Build Host: teich.garten.digitalprojects.com Group : Development/Other Source RPM: (none) Size: 660612 License: GPL Packager: Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL : http://librep.sourceforge.net/ Summary : An embeddable LISP environment Description : This is a lightweight LISP environment for UNIX. It contains a LISP interpreter, byte-code compiler and virtual machine. Applications may use the LISP interpreter as an extension language, or it may be used for standalone scripts. Originally inspired by Emacs Lisp, the language dialect combines many of the elisp features while trying to remove some of the main deficiencies, with features from Common Lisp and Scheme. --- Fri Oct 20 2000 Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.13.1-1mdk - New version - Rebuilt for new gmp lib -- Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: [Cooker] Installing libc 2.1.95-1mdk
What about libnss_nis.so.1, libnss_files.so.1, libnss_dns.so.1, libnss_compat.so.1 and libdl.so.1 ? :-) Owen On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, you wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neville Cobb) writes: > > > when installing libc 2.1.95-1mdk using mandrake update I am presented > > with a screen full or errors stating that libdb.so.2 is needed by a heap > > of programs. In fact the screen scrolls of hte screen. Is there anything > > I should do or just try and proceed with the install. > > You should install db1, db2 and db3 packages at the same time you > upgrade glibc.. > > -- > Fr d ric Crozat > MandrakeSoft
[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] pronto-2.2.1-1mdk
So sprach Lenny Cartier am Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 04:48:09PM +0200: > [Contrib-RPM] > > --=-=-= > Name: pronto Relocations: (not relocateable) > Version : 2.2.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Like I said, Pronto does not work - at least not on my machine. perl: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libgtkhtml.so.4: undefined symbol: new_pspell_config Exact same error message when I compiled Pronto - [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarded a message to me from the maintainer of pronto. It said: He needs to remove his GtkHTML.pm cause its incompatible wiht his libgtkhtml and its causing Pronto not to be able to start GtkHTML but its finding it That's when I quitted working on Pronto and wait for a new gtkhtml release :] Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ:7328191
[Cooker] Can't rebuild python 1.5
Hello!
Python 1.5 cannot be reuild. Error:
gcc -fPIC -I/usr/include/db1 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro
-march=i586 -ffast-math -I./../Include -I.. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c ./dbmmodule.c
./dbmmodule.c:40:18: ndbm.h: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
./dbmmodule.c:45: parse error before `DBM'
./dbmmodule.c:45: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union
./dbmmodule.c:46: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
./dbmmodule.c: In function `newdbmobject':
./dbmmodule.c:63: `dp' undeclared (first use in this function)
./dbmmodule.c:63: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
./dbmmodule.c:63: for each function it appears in.)
./dbmmodule.c:65: parse error before `)'
./dbmmodule.c: In function `dbm_dealloc':
./dbmmodule.c:81: parse error before `*'
./dbmmodule.c:81: declaration for parameter `dbmobject' but no such parameter
./dbmmodule.c:83: invalid type argument of `->'
./dbmmodule.c:84: invalid type argument of `->'
./dbmmodule.c: At top level:
./dbmmodule.c:90: parse error before `dbmobject'
./dbmmodule.c:90: `dp' used prior to declaration
./dbmmodule.c:90: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
./dbmmodule.c:91: parse error before `{'
./dbmmodule.c:100: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
./dbmmodule.c:101: parse error before `for'
./dbmmodule.c:102: request for member `di_dbm' in something not a structure or union
./dbmmodule.c:102: initializer element is not constant
./dbmmodule.c:102: parse error before `)'
./dbmmodule.c:111: parse error before `dbmobject'
./dbmmodule.c:111: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
./dbmmodule.c:112: conflicting types for `key'
./dbmmodule.c:102: previous declaration of `key'
./dbmmodule.c:112: register name not specified for `key'
./dbmmodule.c:113: parse error before `{'
./dbmmodule.c:120: request for member `di_dbm' in something not a structure or union
./dbmmodule.c:120: `krec' undeclared here (not in a function)
./dbmmodule.c:120: initializer element is not constant
./dbmmodule.c:120: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
./dbmmodule.c:121: parse error before `if'
./dbmmodule.c:128: parse error before string constant
./dbmmodule.c:128: conflicting types for `PyErr_SetString'
../Include/pyerrors.h:42: previous declaration of `PyErr_SetString'
./dbmmodule.c:128: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
./dbmmodule.c:136: parse error before `dbmobject'
./dbmmodule.c:136: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
./dbmmodule.c:138: parse error before `{'
./dbmmodule.c:155: parse error before `('
./dbmmodule.c:167: parse error before string constant
./dbmmodule.c:167: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
./dbmmodule.c:173: parse error before string constant
./dbmmodule.c:173: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
./dbmmodule.c:180: `dbm_length' undeclared here (not in a function)
./dbmmodule.c:180: initializer element is not constant
./dbmmodule.c:180: (near initialization for `dbm_as_mapping.mp_length')
./dbmmodule.c:181: `dbm_subscript' undeclared here (not in a function)
./dbmmodule.c:181: initializer element is not constant
./dbmmodule.c:181: (near initialization for `dbm_as_mapping.mp_subscript')
./dbmmodule.c:182: `dbm_ass_sub' undeclared here (not in a function)
./dbmmodule.c:182: initializer element is not constant
./dbmmodule.c:182: (near initialization for `dbm_as_mapping.mp_ass_subscript')
./dbmmodule.c: In function `dbm__close':
./dbmmodule.c:187: parse error before `*'
./dbmmodule.c:187: declaration for parameter `dbmobject' but no such parameter
./dbmmodule.c:192: invalid type argument of `->'
./dbmmodule.c:193: invalid type argument of `->'
./dbmmodule.c:194: invalid type argument of `->'
./dbmmodule.c: In function `dbm_keys':
./dbmmodule.c:201: parse error before `*'
./dbmmodule.c:201: declaration for parameter `dbmobject' but no such parameter
./dbmmodule.c:205: `datum' undeclared (first use in this function)
./dbmmodule.c:205: parse error before `key'
./dbmmodule.c:210: invalid type argument of `->'
./dbmmodule.c:214: invalid type argument of `->'
./dbmmodule.c:214: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a
cast./dbmmodule.c:214: request for member `dptr' in something not a structure or union
./dbmmodule.c:215: invalid type argument of `->'
./dbmmodule.c:215: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a
cast./dbmmodule.c:216: request for member `dptr' in something not a structure or union
./dbmmodule.c:216: request for member `dsize' in something not a structure or union
./dbmmodule.c: In function `dbm_has_key':
./dbmmodule.c:233: parse error before `*'
./dbmmodule.c:233: declaration for parameter `dbmobject' but no such parameter
./dbmmodule.c:236: `datum' undeclared (first use in this function)
./dbmmodule.c:236: parse error before `key'
./dbmmodule.c:238: request for member `dptr' in something not a structure or union
./dbmmodule.c:238: request for member `
Re: [Cooker] reiserfs? anyone?
Yes it works. I use it. I'd recomend against it though. It's not fast, is still not production quality, and unless your system is crashing all the time its unneeded On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > Is anyone successfully using Reiserfs? > > b. > > > > --- Bryan Whitehead Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WorkE: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] reiserfs? anyone?
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Warren Doney wrote: > "Brian J. Murrell" wrote: > > > > Is anyone successfully using Reiserfs? > > /me puts hand up. > > works fine ReiserFS is fine for me. I just wish I could say the same for Mandrake (release, not beta), which missed out the small detail of installing a kernel... James.
Re: [Cooker] reiserfs? anyone?
"Brian J. Murrell" wrote: > > Is anyone successfully using Reiserfs? /me puts hand up. works fine -WBD
[Cooker] rpmlint - package-provides-itself
Hi! I am right now doing recent GMP packages, and having rpmlint check the binary files, I get this warning: W: gmp package-provides-itself Some questions. a) So, what? Can this under any circumstance lead to any trouble? b) Is it a feature of rpm 4.0 that a package provides itself? I wonder why rpmlint warns me about that, because there's no Provides: gmp line in the SPEC file. Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ:7328191
Re: [Cooker] reiserfs? anyone?
So sprach Brian J. Murrell am Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 08:45:46AM -0700: > Is anyone successfully using Reiserfs? Yes, no problems here with 2.2.17-21mdk. Am using it since ~1yr. Never had any troubles at all. Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ:7328191
Re: [Cooker] uncompressed kernel images
So sprach Brian J. Murrell am Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 07:12:34AM -0700: > compressed = vmlinuz > uncompressed = vmlinux Okay, then I misunderstood you, because I didn't think about those files. Sorry for the confusion! Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ:7328191
Re: [Cooker] still problems with dhcp
Alexander Skwar wrote: > > Hmm, but at least for me the decimal notation is clearer than the other > notation. Or maybe it's just, that I'm more used to it. Anyway, what is > 255.240.0.0 in "your" notation? Well... since all addresses are 32 bits long with the first set of bits denoting the network and the last bits denoting the host, the IP/m clearly tells me the number of bits to use for "mask"ing the address to get either part. In your example: /12 (8 from first octet plus 4 from 2nd octet). In dotted decimal notation, most people need to convert from decimal to hex to see the number of bits in the mask. My ealier point was that decimal is not "natural" in a binary world... Besides, "/20" in Udo's case is faster to type and much less error prone than " 255.255.240.0") :^) Udo correctly responded that the mask is legal and required. It makes sense to me that the server should give out both the address and mask. Having a dhclient that refuses to accept _classless_ IP addresses indicates that the code is overdue for a rewrite to bring it up to date. Pierre
Re: [Cooker] Re: Bugtraq: Apache 1.3.14 breaks configuration that use RewriteMaps
On Fri Oct 20, 2000 at 12:00:38PM -0500, Don Head wrote: > >> Just curious, while building Apache 1.3.14, will > >> you be doing PHP 4.0.3p1 as well? A few bugs and > >> a memory leak were fixed. > > > > This is the plan. We realize the importance of > > a new PHP. One thing you need to understand is > > that packages like Apache and PHP aren't > > trivial... they are extremely complex (and > > annoying). I'm glad jm is doing them and not > > me... =) So while it may not be out right > > away, it will be done shortly. > > Oh believe me, I know that. Why do you think I > use Mandrake as a distro rather than roll my own? > And I do know you guys have a lot to do, too. I > was just curious, no hurry. =) That's good to know... And yeah, jm was quite busy which is why it wasn't done sooner, but I have faith in him... I would like to use the newer php myself... =) > You guys are great, btw. =) Thanks! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net // Danen Consulting Serviceswww.danen.net, www.freezer-burn.org // MandrakeSoft, Inc. www.linux-mandrake.com 1024D/FE6F2AFD 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD Current Linux uptime: 3 days 13 hours 48 minutes.
Re: [Cooker] Resizing NTFS
> Remember that to install W2k loader, you must be Administrator which seems > not to be the case. Yup... That situation is realistic... Hmmm... this is looking grim... The only way I can forsee to get the Admin rights is to somehow use a documented hack (buffer-overflow) to get in... Stefan
Re: [Cooker] TradeClient (was: Resizing NTFS)
> http://www.bynari.com/ have a sExchange-compatible email client which runs under > Linux. There are others. It wouldn't surprise me, for example, if Evolution > could deal with MS sExchange as well. I've briefly looked at that product before, I beleive it requires you to run a model (frome bynari) on the exchange server. This is something I don't forsee happening on our exchange servers... Anyway, I've "accepted" this (although I do laugh when the whole mailsystem crumbles when some loveletters are being sent around), my goal is to be able to install Linux next to w2k on this machine, only for the prupose of using Linux as for testing (it's sometimes very handy when you're working on a unix related problem when you have a machine where you can controll all the variables. For instance: I needed to build a reverse proxy for http / https. With a Linux machine I could quickly test the situation, without messing up "production" machines, etc. Stefan
Re: [Cooker] reiserfs? anyone?
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, you wrote: > Is anyone successfully using Reiserfs? > > b. yep - and have been for some time.
RE: [Cooker] Re: Bugtraq: Apache 1.3.14 breaks configuration that use RewriteMaps
>> Just curious, while building Apache 1.3.14, will >> you be doing PHP 4.0.3p1 as well? A few bugs and >> a memory leak were fixed. > > This is the plan. We realize the importance of > a new PHP. One thing you need to understand is > that packages like Apache and PHP aren't > trivial... they are extremely complex (and > annoying). I'm glad jm is doing them and not > me... =) So while it may not be out right > away, it will be done shortly. Oh believe me, I know that. Why do you think I use Mandrake as a distro rather than roll my own? And I do know you guys have a lot to do, too. I was just curious, no hurry. You guys are great, btw. =) Don Head [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Linux Mentor, LCA, Network+, A+ [1 314 692-1942] Wave Technologies, Inc. [1 800 826-4640 x1942] [AIM - Don Wave][ICQ - 18804935][Yahoo - Don_Wave]
[Cooker] reiserfs? anyone?
Is anyone successfully using Reiserfs? b. -- Brian J. Murrell
Re: [Cooker] Re: Bugtraq: Apache 1.3.14 breaks configuration that use RewriteMaps
On Fri Oct 20, 2000 at 10:51:53AM -0500, Don Head wrote: > > I got the patch, I've seen the problem, and I > > will make a new 1.3.14. (or, as Caesar used to > > say in latin, veni vidi vici ;-) > > > > Let me a few hours more... > > Just curious, while building Apache 1.3.14, will > you be doing PHP 4.0.3p1 as well? A few bugs and > a memory leak were fixed. This is the plan. We realize the importance of a new PHP. One thing you need to understand is that packages like Apache and PHP aren't trivial... they are extremely complex (and annoying). I'm glad jm is doing them and not me... =) So while it may not be out right away, it will be done shortly. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net // Danen Consulting Serviceswww.danen.net, www.freezer-burn.org // MandrakeSoft, Inc. www.linux-mandrake.com 1024D/FE6F2AFD 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD Current Linux uptime: 3 days 11 hours 30 minutes.
RE: [Cooker] Re: Bugtraq: Apache 1.3.14 breaks configuration that use RewriteMaps
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Don Head wrote: > Just curious, while building Apache 1.3.14, will > you be doing PHP 4.0.3p1 as well? A few bugs and > a memory leak were fixed. I created php 4.0.3p1 with shared oracle support. Upload it? -- Takika
RE: [Cooker] Re: Bugtraq: Apache 1.3.14 breaks configuration that use RewriteMaps
>>> we read the bugtrack, we didn't upgrade to >>> 1.3.14 but rather fixing security bug on >>> 1.3.12, i believe we all wait of the jmd >>> upgrade. >> >> And I also sent jm the patch the other day as >> well, so he has everything and is aware of the >> problem. > > I got the patch, I've seen the problem, and I > will make a new 1.3.14. (or, as Caesar used to > say in latin, veni vidi vici ;-) > > Let me a few hours more... Just curious, while building Apache 1.3.14, will you be doing PHP 4.0.3p1 as well? A few bugs and a memory leak were fixed. Don Head [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Linux Mentor, LCA, Network+, A+ [1 314 692-1942] Wave Technologies, Inc. [1 800 826-4640 x1942] [AIM - Don Wave][ICQ - 18804935][Yahoo - Don_Wave]
Re: [Cooker] Num-look doesn't work!
Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Peter Ruskin wrote: > > ... but you've renamed /etc/sysconfig/numlock to /etc/sysconfig/NumLock - > > Sorry! - it must have been me - just done a clean install and it _is_ called > /etc/sysconfig/numlock. > must get more sleep > getting senile wanna get killed? :-)) -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] Is kernel 2.4.0 available on 7.2 beta 3?
"Eduardo M. A. M. Mendes" wrote: > > Alexander Skwar wrote: > > > > So sprach Eduardo M. A. M. Mendes am Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 01:59:48PM +: > > > I wonder whether kernel 2.4.0 is available on beta 3? I want to make > > > > Uhm, I actually don't know if hackkernel is in beta3, but you could use the > > cooker packages if it is not, couldn't you? > > So, the hackkernel means 2.4.0? I think I saw an option when > installing beta 3 regarding a hcak kernel. > > Packages - I didn't mean the usual packages. I meant packet - udf read > and write - an experimental > package by some guy at Suse. > > Many thanks. > Eduardo The udf file system is already there in the present kernel, Has been since L_M 7.1. To mount it : mount -t udf /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom (if these are your mount points). - Larry B Sword Voice Mail: 1 858 860-6406 x1587 Fax: 1 858 860-6406 x1587
Re: [Cooker] still problems with dhcp
Alexander Skwar wrote: > So sprach Pierre Fortin am Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 09:13:02AM -0400: > > to avoid all this mask confusion... It's too bad the decimal notation was ever > > used for masks in the first place... > > Hmm, but at least for me the decimal notation is clearer than the other > notation. Or maybe it's just, that I'm more used to it. Anyway, what is > 255.240.0.0 in "your" notation? > > Alexander Skwar > -- > Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx > Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys > ICQ:7328191 Hi, I read all replys and all talked about my or differnt other netmasks. I think it does not make sense to talk about if and which netmask I should use, fact is that my netmask is legal and should work. Maybe this was a little bit confusing, I had put the netmask it in my ifcfg-tr0. But now I have removed it from there and pump take the netmask provided from the dhcp-server. This netmask 255.255.240.0 is the offical netmask which is used by all clients in our network. So I have to use this netmask too. In the past I think, the dhclient got the netmask correctly and was working well without special config-files. Should I now create a dhclient.conf ? or is this a bug in dhclient ? Udo
Re: [Cooker] uncompressed kernel images
from the quill of Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > What's the "uncompressed" or "compressed" version of the kernel? compressed = vmlinuz uncompressed = vmlinux >From my kernel build tree: $ ls -l /usr/src/linux/vmlinux -rwxr-xr-x1 brianbrian 2229532 Oct 17 22:18 /usr/src/linux/vmlinux* $ ls -l /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/bzImage -rw-r--r--1 brianbrian 795429 Oct 17 22:18 /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/bzImage > AFAIK > there are just the compile targets "make zImage" and "make bzImage". Yes, those are both the compressed images. > There's no further compression involved in the bzImage case, I know. > just a > different bootsequence is used in this case. Yes, I do know that thanks. > But it certainly is not > compressed with bzip2, if you were thinking of that. No I was not thinking of that. bzImage is a compressed format of vmlinux. vmlinux can be used with a debugger, bzImage cannot. b. -- Brian J. Murrell
Re: [Cooker] /usr/lib/librpm.so.0: undefined symbol: fdio
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, kpackage and grpmi obviously need to be recompiled for rpm 4.0. for kpackage i'm waiting the last kde2 release to be included in frozen and after i'll upload the patches. for grpmi/mandrakeupdate i let dindin to do it in his develoment branch. -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org Paris, France --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] /usr/lib/librpm.so.0: undefined symbol: fdio
So sprach Udo Weber am Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:35:46AM +0200: > the same for kpackage. Well, kpackage and grpmi obviously need to be recompiled for rpm 4.0. > And I think rpm itself has the same problem but it keep silence about this, No, at least rpm-4.0-3mdk works fine when updating from the net, like in rpm -Uvh ftp://localhost/pub/mirror/contrib/RPMS/gnomerar-0.5.0-1mdk.i586.rpm . Just checked this, and worked flawlessly. Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ:7328191
Re: [Cooker] uncompressed kernel images
So sprach Brian J. Murrell am Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:37:33AM -0700: > the uncompress version of the linux kernel. It would be handy, for What's the "uncompressed" or "compressed" version of the kernel? AFAIK there are just the compile targets "make zImage" and "make bzImage". There's no further compression involved in the bzImage case, just a different bootsequence is used in this case. But it certainly is not compressed with bzip2, if you were thinking of that. But above all: IIRC! Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ:7328191
Re: [Cooker] still problems with dhcp
So sprach Pierre Fortin am Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 09:13:02AM -0400: > to avoid all this mask confusion... It's too bad the decimal notation was ever > used for masks in the first place... Hmm, but at least for me the decimal notation is clearer than the other notation. Or maybe it's just, that I'm more used to it. Anyway, what is 255.240.0.0 in "your" notation? Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ:7328191
[Cooker]
So sprach Lenny Cartier am Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 11:24:37AM +0200: > [Contrib-RPM] > > --=-=-= > Name: gnomerar Relocations: (not relocateable) Hi! Does this package actually work for you or anybody? When I try to create an archive, it just crashes with a SIGSEGV, and trying to open an archive also gives me nothing but a SIGSEGV, but this time it also tells me that the command "gtk-tooltips" cannot be found. Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ:7328191
Re: [Cooker] Is kernel 2.4.0 available on 7.2 beta 3?
So sprach Eduardo M. A. M. Mendes am Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 08:48:05AM +: > That is great! So I have just to install it again, don't I? Or perhaps Basically yes. But make sure that you insmod loop before updating - like always with kernels. And like always with 2.4.0 kernels, be cautious! It may/can/will break things. This kernel is not yet stable, it is not even guaranteed to work. > use the option hack on > lilo? What's that option doing? Never heard of it. > I think I miss something here. Is there another CD apart from the two > Ulysses' CDs on ftp.free.fr? You posted that message to the Cooker mailinglist, or much more, that's where I got it. Now, Cooker is Mandrakes instable distribution that's not meant for daily use. It is kinda expected that things from Cooker do NOT work. Now you are referring to Ulysses. That is the codename for Mandrakes 7.2 stable resale product. These are two different distributions. > If so, where to get a cooker iso image ready to be burnt? Nowhere, Cooker is only available in "split" form, ie. with all the packages downloadable seperately. Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ:7328191
Re: [Cooker] still problems with dhcp
Alexander Skwar wrote: > > So sprach Aaron Cohen am Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 10:57:10AM -0500: > > I noticed that Udo has his netmask set to 255.255.240.0 are you sure that > > that is correct, Uwe? > > Well, .240. IS a legal notation. If you take the private net from > 172.16.0.0. to 172.32.0.0 you have the netmask 255.240.0.0. BUT I tried to > setup a net with this netmask as well, and it did not work. dhclient kept on > telling me that this is no legal netmask. Once I changed this to > 255.255.0.0 dhclient was happy. Sounds like dhclient is using the old 'classful' rules vs the newer 'classless'... Since discontiguous mask bits (such as 0xfff0e011 aka 255.240.224.17 (now _that_ would have been confusing :^)) were deprecated several years ago, we should move on to using the clearer and more compact "/[0-32]" notation, like this: 172.16.0.0/0 (0x aka 0.0.0.0) 172.16.0.0/1 (0x8000 aka 128.0.0.0) 172.16.0.0/2 (0xc000 aka 192.0.0.0) 172.16.0.0/8 (0xff00 aka 255.0.0.0) 172.16.0.0/16 (0x aka 255.255.0.0) 172.16.0.0/20 (0xf000 aka 255.255.240.0) 172.16.0.0/24 (0xff00 aka 255.255.255.0) 172.16.0.0/32 (0x aka 255.255.255.255) to avoid all this mask confusion... It's too bad the decimal notation was ever used for masks in the first place... > Alexander Skwar Pierre
Re: [Cooker] Ulysses 3 blues ....
"Eduardo M. A. M. Mendes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >[...] > > > c) Some linsndexo.so (something like that) is always missing. > > > > You can try urpmf "reg_exp for linsndexo.so" to look at. > > Nothing comes out of it. Is there something wrong? This about the problem of "Some lin..." above, use the right syntax and try it with urpmf, if nothings get out the library is not available ... >[...] > Got it but I must confess I am bit confused about the whole thing. I > checked /usr/src and there is > no mention on a kernel other than 2.2.17. Where is kernel 2.4.0? I am > certainly missing something > here No, but hackkernel-2.4.0 package contains only binaries (as kernel-2.2.17 does). You may want to get the hackkernel-headers and hackkernel-source packages if you just want the source of it. François.
Re: [Cooker] Just a question: will we have another RC or just the definitive release?
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, you wrote: > Hello world! ;) > I was just wondering about the next ISOs... Will I see 7.2-def or another > RC? Indeed there were still few bugs in RC1, so I think it would be useful > to have another RC, maybe for 2-3 days before the "true" 7.2, what do you > think about that? > Anyway, if other developers and testers think that all has been fixed, > don't care of my thoughs =:-D > > Bye and thanks for your great work! > Claudio You could use (like me) an hd.img floppy with aa special partition where you download the latest tree and install from hard disk is faster if it's two differents hard drive a lot ;-)
Re: [Cooker] Ulysses 3 blues ....
Francois Pons wrote: > > "Eduardo M. A. M. Mendes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hello > > Hello, > > >[...] > > Now the problems ( I hope I am not repiting problems posted earlier): > > Can you try with the last RC of 7.2 where a lot of bug have been fixed ? I am trying to download it right now. > > >[...] > > c) Some linsndexo.so (something like that) is always missing. > > You can try urpmf "reg_exp for linsndexo.so" to look at. Nothing comes out of it. Is there something wrong? > > >[...] > > g) Some funny screen behaviour. Parts of the screen go blank without a > > reason. > > Can you try linux_nonfb on boot, and look if everything is the same. Ok. I'll do that shortly. > > > Curiosity: > > > > I installed kernel.2.2.17. Is there an option for installing 2.4.0? > > select hackkernel by hand with DrakX, a label hack will be added to bootloader > used to use it. Got it but I must confess I am bit confused about the whole thing. I checked /usr/src and there is no mention on a kernel other than 2.2.17. Where is kernel 2.4.0? I am certainly missing something here Thanks a lot. Regards Eduardo > > > Many thanks > > > > Eduardo > > François.
Re: [Cooker] character set in linux console
Goetz Waschk schrieb:
>
> Hi,
> this problem was not fixed for a rather long time so I better report it
> here:
> On the linux console, special characters like german umlauts ä,ö,ü are not
> displayed, instead there is e.g. a sum sign for an ö. This looks like there
> is a wrong char set in use, but I know that I didn't modify a setting.
I can confirm the problem here.
--
_
Tschüss und bis demnächst/à bientôt, _|_|_
(") *
Stefan /v\ /
/( )X Penguin Powered!
++(m-m)--+
| Stefan Siegel | http://www.student.uni-kl.de/~siegel/ |
| Kurt-Schumacher-Str. 34 / App. 144 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| D-67663 Kaiserslautern | PGP Public Key: |
| Tel.: +49-631-18269| finger -l [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
++---+
Re: [Cooker] Is kernel 2.4.0 available on 7.2 beta 3?
Alexander Skwar wrote: > > So sprach Eduardo M. A. M. Mendes am Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 06:58:37PM +: > > So, the hackkernel means 2.4.0? I think I saw an option when > > installing beta 3 regarding a hcak kernel. > > Yup, that's what it means. That is great! So I have just to install it again, don't I? Or perhaps use the option hack on lilo? > > > > > Packages - I didn't mean the usual packages. I meant packet - udf read > > and write - an experimental > > package by some guy at Suse. > > I understood that - and I meant packages :], like in files. What I meant to > say, was that if hackkernel was not part of 7.2, you could have used the > files from the Cooker distribution. I think I miss something here. Is there another CD apart from the two Ulysses' CDs on ftp.free.fr? If so, where to get a cooker iso image ready to be burnt? Thanks a lot. Eduardo
[Cooker] character set in linux console
Hi, this problem was not fixed for a rather long time so I better report it here: On the linux console, special characters like german umlauts ä,ö,ü are not displayed, instead there is e.g. a sum sign for an ö. This looks like there is a wrong char set in use, but I know that I didn't modify a setting. CU -- Goetz Waschk <> student of computer science <> university Rostock http://www.informatik.uni-rostock.de/~waschk/waschk.asc for PGP key --> Logout Fascism! <-- PGP signature
[Cooker] Just a question: will we have another RC or just the definitive release?
Hello world! ;) I was just wondering about the next ISOs... Will I see 7.2-def or another RC? Indeed there were still few bugs in RC1, so I think it would be useful to have another RC, maybe for 2-3 days before the "true" 7.2, what do you think about that? Anyway, if other developers and testers think that all has been fixed, don't care of my thoughs =:-D Bye and thanks for your great work! Claudio
[Cooker] Aurora
Tell me, MandrakeSoft people, why is it that when I do a CDROM install from CDs made from the latest ISO images, the bootup and bootdown are both using Aurora to display the process commentary, and it all looks quite wonderful, Whereas when I do an hd install from the latest 7.2beta tree, which is a much later development, I am only given the old line by line textmode bootup and bootdown process commentary? Can the 7.2beta tree installers expect to see Aurora soon? -- Regards, Ron. [AU]
[Cooker] uncompressed kernel images
I have noticed that the kernel and hackkernel packages do not include the uncompress version of the linux kernel. It would be handy, for debugging, if this were included in each of these packages, especially so in the hackkernel package. I know of no way to get the uncompressed image out of vmlinuz. Anyone? b. -- Brian J. Murrell
Re: [Cooker] Installing libc 2.1.95-1mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neville Cobb) writes: > when installing libc 2.1.95-1mdk using mandrake update I am presented > with a screen full or errors stating that libdb.so.2 is needed by a heap > of programs. In fact the screen scrolls of hte screen. Is there anything > I should do or just try and proceed with the install. You should install db1, db2 and db3 packages at the same time you upgrade glibc.. -- Frédéric Crozat MandrakeSoft
Re: [Cooker] Installing libc 2.1.95-1mdk
Neville Cobb wrote: > > when installing libc 2.1.95-1mdk using mandrake update I am presented > with a screen full or errors stating that libdb.so.2 is needed by a heap > of programs. In fact the screen scrolls of hte screen. Is there anything > I should do or just try and proceed with the install. There was the information in glibc-2.1.92 announcement, that you should also install "db1*" and "db2*" packages...
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] glibc-2.1.95-1mdk
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 07:55:51PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > --=-=-=
> > Name: glibcRelocations: (not relocateable)
> > Version : 2.1.95Vendor: MandrakeSoft
>
> There are some dangling symlinks in this package, shown when running
> ldconfig after glibc-2.1.95 and glibc-devel-2.1.95 have been installed:
>
> [root@teich /lib]# ldconfig
> ldconfig: warning: can't open /lib/libnss_nis.so.1 (Datei oder Verzeichnis
> nicht gefunden), skipping
> ldconfig: warning: can't open /lib/libnss_files.so.1 (Datei oder Verzeichnis
> nicht gefunden), skipping
> ldconfig: warning: can't open /lib/libnss_dns.so.1 (Datei oder Verzeichnis
> nicht gefunden), skipping
> ldconfig: warning: can't open /lib/libnss_compat.so.1 (Datei oder
> Verzeichnis nicht gefunden), skipping
>
> Right now, it is like this:
>
> [root@teich /lib]# ls -la /lib/libnss_{nis,files,dns,compat}.so.1
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 23 Sep 14 20:14 /lib/libnss_compat.so.1 ->
>libnss1_compat-2.1.3.so
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 Sep 14 20:14 /lib/libnss_dns.so.1 ->
>libnss1_dns-2.1.3.so
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 22 Sep 14 20:14 /lib/libnss_files.so.1 ->
>libnss1_files-2.1.3.so
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 Sep 14 20:14 /lib/libnss_nis.so.1 ->
>libnss1_nis-2.1.3.so
>
> I suppose, they should be pointing to the 2.1.95 libraries, no?
Yes, certainly.
Seems packager forgot to include them either in sources or in %files list.
Regards,
Dmitry
+-+
Dmitry V. Levin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software Engineer PGP pubkey http://www.fandra.org/users/ldv/pgpkeys.html
IPLabs Linux Team http://linux.iplabs.ru
Fandra Project http://www.fandra.org
+-+
UNIX is user friendly. It's just very selective about who it's friends are.
PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] lyx-1.1.5-4mdk.i586.rpm
I tried the new lyx, lyx-1.1.5-5mdk.i586.rpm and it worked fine! BUT, now I also had changed my screen resolution to 16mln colors. When I changed it back to 256 colors lyx again failed to start (also with "lyx -shared" option). I never have had these problems before with any program or Mandrake, Redhat, FreeBSD, So I assume this is a problem of lyx/lyx-package or of the Mandrake 7.2beta. (I only updated a few packages from the current cooker, such as kdelibs and Xfree86). Note I only worked with KDE-1.99 to try the resolutionsmaybe other wm/de work fine...? Hope this is any help, Kees On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, you wrote: > Kees van Wijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > lyx-1.1.5-4mdk.i586.rpm crashes at startup with segmentation fault. > > I don't kno why it crashes but maybe other people have problems as well? > > sorry but i can't reproduce this. it works great on my machine . > hmmm, so i ask some guys there to test ... > keep in touch. > > > I saw on the lyx web site lyx-1.1.5fix2 is released. So maybe it is > > necessary to build that one if many other people fail to start lyx. > > i'll take a look asap.
[Cooker] Installing libc 2.1.95-1mdk
when installing libc 2.1.95-1mdk using mandrake update I am presented with a screen full or errors stating that libdb.so.2 is needed by a heap of programs. In fact the screen scrolls of hte screen. Is there anything I should do or just try and proceed with the install. Nev
Re: [Cooker] /usr/lib/librpm.so.0: undefined symbol: fdio
"Brian J. Murrell" wrote: > After upgrading to rpm-4.0-3mdk I am getting the following: > > # grpmi >ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/MandrakeCooker/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS//rpmdrake-1.1-14mdk.i586.rpm > > grpmi: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/librpm.so.0: undefined symbol: >fdio > > Thots? > > b. > > -- > Brian J. Murrell the same for kpackage. And I think rpm itself has the same problem but it keep silence about this, the only effect is that it does nothing at all. Udo
[Cooker] /usr/lib/librpm.so.0: undefined symbol: fdio
After upgrading to rpm-4.0-3mdk I am getting the following: # grpmi ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/MandrakeCooker/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS//rpmdrake-1.1-14mdk.i586.rpm grpmi: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/librpm.so.0: undefined symbol: fdio Thots? b. -- Brian J. Murrell
