Re: [Cooker] more corrupted packages
On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 02:10:36AM -0400, Eugenio Diaz wrote: > Corrupted packages keep appearing ... there most be a reason for it, > don't you think? > > [root@fulgore:/home/ftp/pub/linux/mandrake-devel/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS]# > rpm -Uvh gtkgo-0.0.10-6mdk.i586.rpm > gtkgo #unpacking of > archive failed on file /usr/share/gtkgo/pix/gologo.png: cpio: read > failed - Bad file descriptor > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > [root@fulgore:/home/ftp/pub/linux/mandrake-devel/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS]# > rpm --checksig gtkgo-0.0.10-6mdk.i586.rpm > gtkgo-0.0.10-6mdk.i586.rpm: MD5 NOT OK > [root@fulgore:/home/ftp/pub/linux/mandrake-devel/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS]# > Well, this is one of the packages I'm in charge of. What should I do? Recommit it? DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] MandrakeUpdate-7.0-30mdk
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 05:32:57PM +0200, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: > > Name: MandrakeUpdate Distribution: Linux-Mandrake > > Version : 7.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > > > > - Version 7.1 > > :) > Well. You're right this is not a really good changelog entry. The Version of the utility cannot be changed because of the freeze. The 7.1 is what *distribution* version the MandrakeUpdate is now made for. Sorry for the confusion. DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xearth-1.1-3mdk
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 06:05:02AM -0500, Vincent Saugey wrote: > --=-=-= > Name: xearth Distribution: Linux-Mandrake > Version : 1.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 3mdk Build Date: Fri Apr 28 06:45:50 2000 > Install date: (not installed) Build Host: kenobi.mandrakesoft.com > Group : Toys Source RPM: (none) > Size: 157355 > Packager: Vincent Saugey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Summary : An X display of the Earth from space. > Description : > Xearth is an X Window System based graphic that shows a globe of the > Earth, including markers for major cities and MandrakeSoft. The > Earth is correctly shaded for the current position of the sun, and the > displayed image is updated every five minutes. > > --=-=-= > > * Fri Apr 28 2000 Vincent Saugey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.1-3mdk > > - Fixed icon path in menu entry > Grr. This is MY package. DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gtkgraph-0.6.1-3mdk
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 05:50:03AM -0500, Vincent Saugey wrote: > --=-=-= > Name: gtkgraphDistribution: Linux-Mandrake > Version : 0.6.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 3mdk Build Date: Fri Apr 28 06:27:31 2000 > Install date: (not installed) Build Host: kenobi.mandrakesoft.com > Group : Sciences/Mathematics Source RPM: (none) > Size: 284890 > Packager: Vincent Saugey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > URL : http://gtkgraph.linuxbox.com > Summary : Simple GTK graphing calculator > Description : > GtkGraph is an application designed to replace a conventional graphing > calculator. It allows you to plot up to 10 functions on the same graph. > Graphs may be exported to PostScript, printed, or exported to any bitmap file > format that Imlib supports. The user can zoom and scroll, or set > the range manually with X/Y minimums and X/Y maximums. In addition, a small > arithmatic calculator window is included, which has a convenient history > mechanism. > > --=-=-= > > * Fri Apr 28 2000 Vincent Saugey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.6.1-3mdk > > - Fixed path in icon entry > Grr. This is MY package. DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gtkeyboard-1.0-2mdk
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 05:40:04AM -0500, Vincent Saugey wrote: > --=-=-= > Name: gtkeyboard Distribution: Linux-Mandrake > Version : 1.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 2mdk Build Date: Fri Apr 28 06:22:49 2000 > Install date: (not installed) Build Host: kenobi.mandrakesoft.com > Group : Toys Source RPM: (none) > Size: 184753 > Packager: Vincent Saugey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > URL : http://opop.nols.com/ > Summary : Graphical Keyboard > Description : > GTKeyboard is an application meant to help users with physical > disabilities who may be unable to use the keyboard all the time to > type text using a graphically laid out keyboard. It is also used by > people who are simply a little bit lazy. At this point, it has > support for several foreign keyboards as well as ability to redirect > keypresses to other X11 applications > > --=-=-= > > * Fri Apr 28 2000 Vincent Saugey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.0-2mdk > > - Fixed path in menu entry > Grr. This is MY package... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] mutt-1.0.1i-6mdk and an install issue
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 08:21:54PM -0700, Anton Graham wrote: > Submitted 27-Apr-00 by David Odin (aka DindinX): > | Could you please test with mutt-1.0.1i-7mdk and see if the problem is gone? > | I'm not sure about what the problem was, but it looks it's gone :/ > | > | DindinX > > She works now, thanks. > So the problem comes from the machine it was previously compile on. I'll have a look at this now. DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hackgimp-1.1.20-2mdk
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 01:55:03PM -0500, Thierry Vignaud wrote: > [Contrib-RPM] > > --=-=-= > Name: hackgimpDistribution: Linux-Mandrake > Version : 1.1.20Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 2mdk Build Date: Thu Apr 27 14:31:40 2000 > Install date: (not installed) Build Host: kenobi.mandrakesoft.com > Group : Graphics Source RPM: (none) > Size: 7456330 > Packager: Geoffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > URL : http://www.gimp.org > Summary : The GNU Image Manipulation Program > Description : > The GIMP is an image manipulation program suitable for photo retouching, > image composition and image authoring. Many people find it extremely useful > in creating logos and other graphics for web pages. The GIMP has many of the > tools and filters you would expect to find in similar commercial offerings, > and some interesting extras as well. > > The GIMP provides a large image manipulation toolbox, including channel > operations and layers, effects, sub-pixel imaging and anti-aliasing, > and conversions, all with multi-level undo. > > This version of The GIMP includes a scripting facility, but many of the > included scripts rely on fonts that we cannot distribute. The GIMP ftp > site has a package of fonts that you can install by yourself, which > includes all the fonts needed to run the included scripts. Some of the > fonts have unusual licensing requirements; all the licenses are documented > in the package. Get ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/fonts/freefonts-0.10.tar.bz2 > and ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/fonts/sharefonts-0.10.tar.bz2 if you are so > inclined. Alternatively, choose fonts which exist on your system before > running the scripts. > > *DEVELOPMENT VERSION!! PLEASE USE WITH CARE!!* > > --=-=-= > > * Thu Apr 27 2000 Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.1.20-2mdk > > as Lords L. & L. ask for help, > - fix compilation on Mandrake :-( > - various spec cleanups for rpmlint (invalid groups, post & postun scripts, > ...) > - new group scheme for libgimp > - use spechelper > - nearly 99% of the new doc has been forgotten in previous rpm: greaat... > News from the gimp cvs: gimp-1.1.20 is now officially the first 1.2 pre-release :) DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] mutt-1.0.1i-6mdk and an install issue
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 07:06:58PM +0200, diablero wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 08:44:38AM -0700, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> > AG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > The binary RPM *appears* to be broken. It functions just fine until you
> > > attempt to send mail (not just compose). At that point, it generates
> > > an error
> > > execing child process (child returns code 127). I rebuilt from the
> > > SRPM and it
> > > functions properly without modification.
> >
> > i definitely can't reproduce this bug.
>
> I have reinstalled mutt-1.0.1i-6mdk. I have the same bug.
> I have done a strace -ff -o /tmp/log mutt and I think I have found the bug:
> in the log.pid of the process launched after emacs:
>
> open("/tmp/mutt-purple42-20326-2", O_RDONLY) = 0
> unlink("/tmp/mutt-purple42-20326-2")= 0
> open("/tmp/mutt-purple42-20326-3", O_WRONLY|O_APPEND|O_CREAT|O_EXCL, 0600) = 1
> dup(1) = 2
> execve("no", ["no", "-oem", "-oi", "--", "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"], [/* 46 vars
>*/]) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> _exit(127) = ?
>
Could you please test with mutt-1.0.1i-7mdk and see if the problem is gone?
I'm not sure about what the problem was, but it looks it's gone :/
DindinX
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] Quota and xpaint still conflict
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 08:34:25AM -0700, Quel Qun wrote: > Hi, > > I still can't install these two packages: > > # rpm -U quota-1.66-11mdk.i586.rpm > file /usr/sbin/rpc.rquotad from install of quota-1.66-11mdk conflicts with file from >package nfs-utils-0.1.7-2mdk > > # rpm -U xpaint-2.4.9-13mdk.i586.rpm > file /usr/share/icons/xpaint.xpm from install of xpaint-2.4.9-13mdk conflicts with >file from package fvwm2-icons-2.2.4-3mdk > I'm working on that one... DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] fvwm2-icons-2.2.4-3mdk
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 04:14:27AM -0700, Anton Graham wrote: > > [anton@bladehawke RPMS]$ sudo rpm -Fvh fvwm* > file /usr/share/icons/xpaint.xpm from install of fvwm2-icons-2.2.4-3mdk > conflicts with file from package xpaint-2.4.9-13mdk > Ok. I'm going to remove xpaint.xpm from fvwm2-icons. While I'm at it, is there any other applications that provide an icon in /usr/share/icons that conflict with fvwm2-icons? DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] let's make better RPMs! [Was: [CHRPM]howto-html-de-7.1-1mdk]
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 12:10:27AM +0200, David BAUDENS wrote: > Stefan Siegel a écrit : > > > Am 2000-04-23, um 22:11:40 (+0200) schrieb David BAUDENS: > > > Of course but menu system doesn't support tests. > > > > No problems with the menu system, > > False. It's the problem. > Please read the docs. It is only a problem if you use needs=X11. In that case, yes, people will need a x11 web browser to view howtos. In another life, I've seen things such as needs=dwww for html documentation. What we could do is to add a line in each WM we have for the menu-method file between supported an endsupported, to support these kind of dwww. OK. May be too much work for now, but should absolutely be supported for our next releases > > > my problem is that you force the > > netscape RPM to be installed, for being able to use the HOWTOs. > > Because if you see in WM menu an entry for Howto and if when you click > on it nothing appear, you'll say: « Nothing appear... It's buggy! » and > I won't that you say that. When you clic in menu, « netscape > /usr/doc/HOWTO/HTML/$LANG/index.html is call ». So, Netscape is > required. > Nope, a wrapper like this one is required: if [ -x /usr/X11R6/bin/netscape ] ; netscape $@ elsif [ -x /usr/X11R6/bin/kfm ] ; kfm $@ elsif ... lynx $@ else cat $@ | sed -e 's/<[^>]>//g' | less fi Sorry, if the syntax is buggy, I guess you got the idea. > > > > As I want that HTML can be read when you select them in menu, > > > I use an independent WM/DM viewer (and no I'll use lynx, beginners > > > don't like it). > > > > IMHO this is not correct. place a > > > > --8<->8 > > Provides: htmlbrowser > > --8<->8 > > > > line in "lynx" "lynx-ssl" and "netscape" RPMs. this is the correct way > > to deal with it. > > No, not with actual menu system. I can only call one program and I can't > do any test to know what « htmlbrowser » is available (for the moment) > See wrapper above. DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] drakfloppy-0.30-1mdk
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 05:30:02AM -0500, dam's wrote: > --=-=-= > Name: drakfloppy Distribution: Linux-Mandrake > Version : 0.30 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 1mdk Build Date: Wed Apr 19 05:53:08 2000 > Install date: (not installed) Build Host: kenobi.mandrakesoft.com > Group : System/Configuration/Boot and Init Source RPM: (none) > Size: 54973 > Packager: dam's <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Summary : Graphical front end of mkbootdisk. > Description : > Graphical front end of mkbootdisk. You can make standard boot disk, and add specific >modules. > > --=-=-= > > * Wed Apr 19 2000 dam's <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.30-1mdk > > - Changing name from drakbootdisk to drakfloppy. Grr. I guess I have to redo the DrakConf package then. Does the CVS repository has also changed? In short what has changed and what has not? DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] vim-common-5.6-13mdk vs. ctags-3.2-6mdk
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 01:35:28PM +0200, Warly wrote: > > > > file /usr/bin/ctags from install of vim-common-5.6-13mdk conflicts with > > > file from package ctags-3.2-6mdk > > > file /usr/man/man1/ctags.1.bz2 from install of vim-common-5.6-13mdk > > > conflicts with file from package ctags-3.2-6mdk > > > > ctags-3.2 is obsolete. Vim include ctags-3.4. > > > > What is the Right Thing to do here? > > > > - Remove the ctags-3.2 package ? > > - Make vim-src build a ctags package ? > > > > QA ? > > > > if ctags is only or mainly used by vim let in into vim package, > otherwise build a separate rpm > Traditionnaly ctags has always been tied with VI. ctags can be used on any source file, whatever it has been created with. And these editors can use the tags: vi(1) and its many derivatives emacs CRiSP FTE (Folding Text Editor) Lemmy NEdit TSE (The SemWare Editor) Zeus So I guess it's time for ctags to have its own package. Here is what I suggest: - remove ctags-3.2-xmdk.i586.rpm and ctags-3.2-xmdk.i586.src.rpm from cooker - Inform the ctags maintainer that its package just disappeared. - make vim.spec generate a ctags-3.4-xmdk.i586.rpm from the vim sources - make vim-common depends on ctags. QA, could you do the first two steps, I'll do the two others. Thanks, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] bonobo-0.5-4mdk
On Sat, Apr 15, 2000 at 07:08:12PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > "David Odin (aka DindinX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 09:14:33PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > > > > > > > > version 0.9 is out for some days. 0.5 is there since october and is very > > > > > old/buggy. > > > > > > > > > > Could we upgrade to a more recent version. > > > > > > > > > >I can make the package for 0.9 if you want to. > > > > > > > > I would like it :-))) > > > > > > > OK. I'll do. > > > > > > > > I'm stuck on gnumeric for the moment. > > > > > > > :) The funny thing is that Gnumeric is the only app we have that could > > > optionnally depends on bonobo. > > > > > > > wrong, > > see glade, libglade, nautilus, dia, the new gimp in development, > > and many other that i've forgotten. > > Yes, *but* for the moment no package is compiled with bonobo support, same > for helix packages. they don't even provide a bonobo helix. > > Okay for keeping it -- but don't we forget it seems quite not ready for > the moment. > I have bad news about this. I've tried to compile gnumeric 0.52 with bonobo 0.9 (both latest version) and it looks like gnumeric wants a more recent (i.e cvs) version of bonobo. So bonobo is completly useless for us in main distrib. :( DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] bonobo-0.5-4mdk
On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 09:14:33PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > > version 0.9 is out for some days. 0.5 is there since october and is very > > old/buggy. > > > > Could we upgrade to a more recent version. > > > >I can make the package for 0.9 if you want to. > > I would like it :-))) > OK. I'll do. > > I'm stuck on gnumeric for the moment. > :) The funny thing is that Gnumeric is the only app we have that could optionnally depends on bonobo. DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] bonobo-0.5-4mdk
On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 11:35:01AM -0500, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > --=-=-= > Name: bonobo Distribution: Linux-Mandrake > Version : 0.5 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 4mdk Build Date: Thu Apr 13 11:34:15 2000 > Install date: (not installed) Build Host: kenobi.mandrakesoft.com > Group : System/Libraries Source RPM: (none) > Size: 445042 > Packager: Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > URL : http://www.gnome.org/ > Summary : Library for compound documents in GNOME > Description : > Bonobo is a library that provides the necessary framework for GNOME > applications to deal with compound documents, i.e. those with a > spreadsheet and graphic embedded in a word-processing document. > > --=-=-= > > * Thu Apr 13 2000 Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.5-4mdk > > - new groups > - dirty fix to install the ./idl subdir > version 0.9 is out for some days. 0.5 is there since october and is very old/buggy. Could we upgrade to a more recent version. I can make the package for 0.9 if you want to. DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] menu-2.1.5-7mdk
On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 04:52:41PM +0200, Frederic Lepied wrote: > "David Odin (aka DindinX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > Which wm reports empty sections ? > > > > > fvwm2 at least. Not tested with other. Do you want me to test this > > extensively? > > > It would be fine but I haven't the problem here with fvwm2. Which menu > has a problem ? Applications/Archiving is there where I haven't any entry there for instance. Does this comes from my (somewhat buggy) installation? DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] menu-2.1.5-7mdk
On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 03:58:03PM +0200, Frederic Lepied wrote: > "David Odin (aka DindinX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 03:34:17PM +0200, Frederic Lepied wrote: > > > "David Odin (aka DindinX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 04:50:04AM -0500, Frederic Lepied wrote: > > > > > --=-=-= > > > > > Name: menuDistribution: Linux-Mandrake > > > > > Version : 2.1.5 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > > > > > Release : 7mdk Build Date: Tue Apr 11 04:33:01 >2000 > > > > > Install date: (not installed) Build Host: >kenobi.mandrakesoft.com > > > > > Group : System/Base Source RPM: (none) > > > > > Size: 249909 > > > > > Packager: Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Summary : menu system > > > > > Description : > > > > > The intent of this package is to streamline the menu's. > > > > > For this purpose, menu provides an "update-menus" command, > > > > > that will read all installed menu files (as provided by > > > > > other packages in /usr/lib/menu), and run the frontents for various > > > > > window-managers in /etc/menu-methods to create startup files for > > > > > the window managers (or pdmenu). > > > > > The user and system admin can easily override the menu files > > > > > on a by-user or by-system bases. > > > > > > > > > > --=-=-= > > > > > > > > > > * Mon Apr 10 2000 Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.1.5-7mdk > > > > > > > > > > - added icons for menu sections. > > > > > - added order in sections. > > > > > > > > > Why does it add empty sections? I don't think it's the Right Thing To > > > > Do(tm). I believe we should only have a section if it's non empty. > > > > > > What is the right thing to do ? How do you add icons to sections ? > > > > Well. I don't know. But I really think it is worst to have empty sections > > than to have sections without icons. > > Which wm reports empty sections ? > fvwm2 at least. Not tested with other. Do you want me to test this extensively? > > P.S: What is 'order in sections'? > > > It's used by KDE to order the menu sections. OK. Thanks. DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] menu-2.1.5-7mdk
On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 03:34:17PM +0200, Frederic Lepied wrote: > "David Odin (aka DindinX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 04:50:04AM -0500, Frederic Lepied wrote: > > > --=-=-= > > > Name: menuDistribution: Linux-Mandrake > > > Version : 2.1.5 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > > > Release : 7mdk Build Date: Tue Apr 11 04:33:01 2000 > > > Install date: (not installed) Build Host: kenobi.mandrakesoft.com > > > Group : System/Base Source RPM: (none) > > > Size: 249909 > > > Packager: Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Summary : menu system > > > Description : > > > The intent of this package is to streamline the menu's. > > > For this purpose, menu provides an "update-menus" command, > > > that will read all installed menu files (as provided by > > > other packages in /usr/lib/menu), and run the frontents for various > > > window-managers in /etc/menu-methods to create startup files for > > > the window managers (or pdmenu). > > > The user and system admin can easily override the menu files > > > on a by-user or by-system bases. > > > > > > --=-=-= > > > > > > * Mon Apr 10 2000 Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.1.5-7mdk > > > > > > - added icons for menu sections. > > > - added order in sections. > > > > > Why does it add empty sections? I don't think it's the Right Thing To > > Do(tm). I believe we should only have a section if it's non empty. > > What is the right thing to do ? How do you add icons to sections ? Well. I don't know. But I really think it is worst to have empty sections than to have sections without icons. Isn't it possible for menu to test is a section actually exists before creating it? I guess it's not an easy thing to do, but nothing is really impossible for you, isn't it? DindinX P.S: What is 'order in sections'? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] menu-2.1.5-7mdk
On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 04:50:04AM -0500, Frederic Lepied wrote: > --=-=-= > Name: menuDistribution: Linux-Mandrake > Version : 2.1.5 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 7mdk Build Date: Tue Apr 11 04:33:01 2000 > Install date: (not installed) Build Host: kenobi.mandrakesoft.com > Group : System/Base Source RPM: (none) > Size: 249909 > Packager: Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Summary : menu system > Description : > The intent of this package is to streamline the menu's. > For this purpose, menu provides an "update-menus" command, > that will read all installed menu files (as provided by > other packages in /usr/lib/menu), and run the frontents for various > window-managers in /etc/menu-methods to create startup files for > the window managers (or pdmenu). > The user and system admin can easily override the menu files > on a by-user or by-system bases. > > --=-=-= > > * Mon Apr 10 2000 Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.1.5-7mdk > > - added icons for menu sections. > - added order in sections. > Why does it add empty sections? I don't think it's the Right Thing To Do(tm). I believe we should only have a section if it's non empty. What do you mean by 'order in sections'? Does this mean the sort="|" trick won't work anymore? DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] harddrake-0.5.3-6mdk
On Fri, Apr 07, 2000 at 04:15:02AM -0500, Alexandre Dussart wrote: > --=-=-= > Name: harddrake Distribution: Mandrake > Version : 0.5.3 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 6mdk Build Date: Fri Apr 07 04:35:47 2000 > Install date: (not installed) Build Host: kenobi.mandrakesoft.com > Group : System/Configuration/Hardware Source RPM: (none) > Size: 123034 > Packager: Alexandre Dussart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > URL : http://www.linuxmandrake.com/lothar > Summary : Hardware Central Configuration Tool > Description : > This is the central configuration tool that calls all the other > configuration tools. > > --=-=-= > > * Fri Apr 07 2000 Alexandre Dussart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > - Lothar becomes HardDrake > It's good to see you again Alex! Regards, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] blackbox-0.51.3.1-18mdk
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 09:20:05AM -0500, Frederic Lepied wrote: > --=-=-= > Name: blackboxDistribution: Linux-Mandrake > Version : 0.51.3.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 18mdk Build Date: Tue Apr 04 08:59:14 2000 > Install date: (not installed) Build Host: kenobi.mandrakesoft.com > Group : Graphical desktop/Other Source RPM: (none) > Size: 181240 > Packager: Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > URL : http://blackbox.alug.org/ > Summary : A window manager for the X Window System > Description : > Blackbox is yet another addition to the list of window managers for > the Open Group's X Window System, Version 11 Release 6 and > above. Blackbox is built with C++, sharing no common code with any > other window manager (even though the graphics implementation is > similar to that of Window Maker). > > --=-=-= > > * Tue Apr 04 2000 Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.51.3.1-18mdk > > - i18n menu support. > I've (yet another) question about the menu handing in Window Managers :-/ How the user is supposed to exit the X session, now that the default menu has disappeared for the 'Menu' one? Ctrl-Alt-BackSpace isn't a solution. I think we should add an 'Exit' entry somewhere. Any thoughts? DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kdebase-1.1.2-40mdk
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 01:15:04AM -0500, Frederic Lepied wrote: > --=-=-= > Name: kdebase Distribution: Linux-Mandrake > Version : 1.1.2 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 40mdk Build Date: Mon Apr 03 01:20:14 2000 > Install date: (not installed) Build Host: kenobi.mandrakesoft.com > Group : Graphical desktop/KDE Source RPM: (none) > Size: 7509317 > Packager: Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Summary : K Desktop Environment - core files > Description : > Core applications for the K Desktop Environment. > Included are: kdm (replacement for xdm), kwm (window manager), kfm > (filemanager, web browser, ftp client, ...), konsole (xterm replacement), > kpanel (application starter and desktop pager), kaudio (audio server), > kdehelp (viewer for kde help files, info and man pages), plus other KDE > components (kcheckpass, kikbd, kvt, kscreensaver, kcontrol, kfind, > kfontmanager, kmenuedit, kappfinder). > > PAM password authentication is supported via PAM service: kde. > > --=-=-= > > * Mon Apr 03 2000 Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.1.2-40mdk > > - refresh the desktop at the end of the menu method. > - fixed rpmlint warnings. > - updated menu method for l10n. > - put entries in root menu instead of Applications. > Shouldn't the root-only applications such as kdmconfig be launched by command="kdesu -c kdmconfig" in the menu? DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
[Cooker] No space left on kenobi/home
Hi all, The home directory of kenobi is full (or nearly). I cannot work anymore!!! Could you please remove unnecessary stuff? Thx DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] KOffice packages
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 11:22:29PM +0200, Gael Duval wrote: > Hello, > > by the way, did some of you install the new Koffice packages just made > by David Faure? > > Those are really good pieces of software, you can include a kspread > table under kword etc. If you can test those packages and report bugs > to the KOffice team (and especially to David Faure), this will speed > up the development of Koffice and maybe we can put it in Mandrake 7.1. > Ok. I've just downloaded and install it. Here's my first impressions: - It really looks like a complete suite, good, - Good overall works, - I don't like the widget set, but everybody knows that :) (I guess it is themable, isn't it? so this isn't a big deal...) - In KWord: - If you're on the last Tab of a line and you press the 'Tab' key, the cursor is moved on the first Tab of the next line when I expected it to go to the beginning of the next line. - The use of Tab with Enumerated list make Kword segfault. I know, it is not something we're supposed to use every day but it shouldn't SegFault. I've not gone any further for now. David Faure, please don't take these as criticisms but merely as bug reports. Koffice looks great and is a great project, even if I'm a GTK-geek :) Regards, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gtkgraph-0.5.2-2mdk
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 11:11:46AM +0200, Pixel wrote: > DindinX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Name: gtkgraphDistribution: Linux-Mandrake > > [...] > > > Group : Graphics Source RPM: (none) > > what about Sciences/Mathematics ??? Oups! I missed that Group. I have to admit I wasn't satisfied with Graphics. Thanks. I'm changing this now. DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] vim-5.6-10mdk
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 03:48:49PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > DindinX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > --=-=-= > > Name: vim Distribution: Linux-Mandrake > > Version : 5.6 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > > Release : 10mdk Build Date: Mon Mar 27 15:10:58 2000 > > Install date: (not installed) Build Host: >lyon1-52-197.dial.proxad.net > > Group : Editors Source RPM: (none) > > Size: 1848074 > > Packager: David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Summary : VIsual editor iMproved > > Description : > > VIM (VIsual editor iMproved) is an updated and improved version of the vi > > editor. Vi was the first real screen-based editor for UNIX, and is still > > very popular. VIM improves on vi by adding new features: multiple windows, > > multi-level undo, block highlighting and more. The vim-common package > > contains files which every VIM binary will need in order to run. > > Warning Dindin you are using invalid menu entries. > > Apps/Editors is not good > > see http://intranet/qa/next-release/menus-structure.txt for correct menu > entries > Grrr. I've just changed it from Applications/Editors to Apps/Editors because of the ICEWM default menu !!! (Fred could you fix this please?) Thanks, I'll change it back again. Thanks, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] xanim
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 02:20:52PM -0800, CPT KIDD wrote: > they are small enough to email. think i can further compress them to around > 200k or less. w/o compression is going to be large. i'm using the radius > compression. ...yea... i d/l'd the decompression tar's from there (or the main > xanim site) last night. still haven't gotten around to tossing it in yet. i > do have a new geforce card tho', so this could be theproblem. dunno. > Be carefull! I don't think you're allowed to mail them (because of the stupid license they have). Check it out. Regards, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gtk+-1.2.7-4mdk
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 08:49:24AM +0100, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: > On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, DindinX wrote: > > > Name: gtk+Distribution: Linux-Mandrake > > Version : 1.2.7 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > > > > > - corrected the paths in glib-config > > > > Shouldn't this be gtk-config? > :) Yes, also. The thruth is gtk-config is build upon glib-config and the superfluous paths really came from glib-config. Admittedly, I've used copy & paste one time too many ;-) DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] gtk+-devel-1.2.7-2mdk
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 10:15:09AM +0800, geoffrey lee wrote: > > yo! > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Odin (aka DindinX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 2:26 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Cooker] gtk+-devel-1.2.7-2mdk > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 01:45:15AM +0800, geoffrey lee wrote: > > > hi, > > > > > > David, could you please apply the following spec diff file , > > made against > > > gtk+ spec 1.2.7-3mdk, and do a recompile. it seems to fix a problem > > > described below. > > > > > Sorry, I'm currently updloading a fix for this. > > The problem didn't came from the %prefix tag but from my own installation > > of glib (for some specific purposes, I've always two flavours of glib > > on my box, and one of them is in /usr/local...) > > no wonder when i got the spec diff from the cvsweb i was puzzled since > nothing in configuer and build were changed... > Yes :) I've invented the bug that required no changes to be fixed... > > [ ... ] > > yes, but programs need gtk-config when they compile .. > Programs compiles anyway, even with two more directories in the include path. > > welcome. :) > > i think the spec helper is pretty cool. does stripping, compressing and > clean. no more it's a required dependency ifyou have installed rpm 3.0.4 ... Yep. I need to study it closer. Regards, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] glibconfig.h?
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 02:08:20PM -0800, Quel Qun wrote: > In glib.h, there is a line: > > #include > > but glibconfig.h is installed in /usr/lib/glib/include (?) > > weird. > Yes. Weird. /usr/lib/glib/include is a very weird place to put a .h file. Anyway, this is the standard place for this file, as decided by the GTK team. Don't ask me why, this may have something to do with FHS... That's why you should always use: gcc -c foo.c -o foo.o `glib-config --cflags` when you compile a file that use the glib Regards, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] gtk+-devel-1.2.7-2mdk
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 01:45:15AM +0800, geoffrey lee wrote: > hi, > > David, could you please apply the following spec diff file , made against > gtk+ spec 1.2.7-3mdk, and do a recompile. it seems to fix a problem > described below. > Sorry, I'm currently updloading a fix for this. The problem didn't came from the %prefix tag but from my own installation of glib (for some specific purposes, I've always two flavours of glib on my box, and one of them is in /usr/local...) > > > > 'gtk-config --cflags gtk' gives me a > > > > -I/usr/local/lib/glib/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include > > > > FIXED. 3mdk also seemed ot have the problem that you were describing. > Yes it does. For the exact same reason. > > Obviously wrong! No include files under /usr/local/... > > yes. it's majorly wrong. > Wrong, but it doesn't really hurt... Anyway I keep the spec-helper idea for a next release. Thanks Geoffrey, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
Re: [Cooker] DrakConf
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 10:26:27AM -0800, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > "David Odin (aka DindinX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >Yes. I've totally screwed up the version numbering... > >(Well, Chmouel helped me to do so :) > > ??? what ? > Don't be offended, Chmouel. Last release of DrakConf you made was 0.37-1mdk, but the DrakConf.spec said 0.34-1mdk. So I've increased the release number and we then have 0.34-2mdk which is < 0.37-1mdk. At this point every thing was screwed up. My point was : you changed DrakConf.spec version number without changing the Makefile accordingly, and that upseted me. Look at the smiley, that was supposed to be a joke :) I didn't intend to blame you, of course. Sorry, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] DrakeLogo & alpha
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 06:58:21PM +0100, Stefan van der Eijk wrote: > Attached is the buildoutput of the current DrakeLogo (from the cooker > distro). > Could you check if these lines appears in the Makefile: savelogo.c: ln -sf savelogo-i386.c savelogo-alpha.c ln -sf savelogo-$(ARCH).c savelogo.c If not, try to add them and re-build, and tell me if it changes things. ... Oups. I've just checked. These lines doesn't appear in the -5mdk release. I'll add them, but I'm waiting for your experiment... Thanks, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] DrakeLogo & alpha
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 01:16:03PM +0100, David Odin (aka DindinX) wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 08:24:46PM +0100, Stefan van der Eijk wrote: > > I was just compiling DrakeLogo on my alpha, when I noticed that > > it tries to make a link from savelogo-alpha.c to savelogo.c. This > > doesn't work b'cause savelogo-alpha.c doesn't exist... > > > > Changelog DrakeLogo.o convert.h savelogo-i386.c > > DrakeLogo.HelpFile DrakeLogo.spec default_logo.h savelogo-sparc.c > > DrakeLogo.c Makefilefsdither.h savelogo.c@ > > DrakeLogo.h convert.c po/ savelogo.h > > [root@c187122075 DrakeLogo-1.0]# > > > > So... I copied savelogo-sparc.c to savelogo-alpha.c and renamed > > all instances of "sparc" to alpha... and what do you know... it > > builds... And it runs... > > > > Could someone with some programming knowledge see if I did the > > right thing... > > >Sorry, but your patch is very wrong. > >If you have a look at the Makefile, you'll noticed that savelogo-alpha.c > is really a link from savelogo-i386.c, so the problem should be elsewhere. >I can't understand why this link isn't created for you though. >See this extract from the Makefile: > savelogo.c: > ln -sf savelogo-i386.c savelogo-alpha.c > ln -sf savelogo-$(ARCH).c savelogo.c > > Anyway, I really want you to test DrakeLogo on alpha, since I can't test > it myself (I don't own an alpha :( ). > > Tell me if it works as it should. > Could you please try with DrakeLogo-1.0-5mdk.src.rpm ? DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] DrakeLogo & alpha
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 08:24:46PM +0100, Stefan van der Eijk wrote: > I was just compiling DrakeLogo on my alpha, when I noticed that > it tries to make a link from savelogo-alpha.c to savelogo.c. This > doesn't work b'cause savelogo-alpha.c doesn't exist... > > Changelog DrakeLogo.o convert.h savelogo-i386.c > DrakeLogo.HelpFile DrakeLogo.spec default_logo.h savelogo-sparc.c > DrakeLogo.c Makefilefsdither.h savelogo.c@ > DrakeLogo.h convert.c po/ savelogo.h > [root@c187122075 DrakeLogo-1.0]# > > So... I copied savelogo-sparc.c to savelogo-alpha.c and renamed > all instances of "sparc" to alpha... and what do you know... it > builds... And it runs... > > Could someone with some programming knowledge see if I did the > right thing... > Sorry, but your patch is very wrong. If you have a look at the Makefile, you'll noticed that savelogo-alpha.c is really a link from savelogo-i386.c, so the problem should be elsewhere. I can't understand why this link isn't created for you though. See this extract from the Makefile: savelogo.c: ln -sf savelogo-i386.c savelogo-alpha.c ln -sf savelogo-$(ARCH).c savelogo.c Anyway, I really want you to test DrakeLogo on alpha, since I can't test it myself (I don't own an alpha :( ). Tell me if it works as it should. Thanks, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] DrakConf
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 08:46:57PM -0900, WH Bouterse wrote: > I attempt to rpm -Uvh DrakConf-0.34-2mdk > > I get the "DrakConf-0.34-12mdk is newer" message. > > Should I go ahead and --force ? > Yes. I've totally screwed up the version numbering... (Well, Chmouel helped me to do so :) I'm going to release the exact same version as a 0.50-1mdk to solve this problem. Sorry. DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-3.0.4-0.3mdk
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 06:30:05AM -0600, Frederic Lepied wrote: > --=-=-= > Name: rpm Distribution: Linux-Mandrake > Version : 3.0.4 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 0.3mdkBuild Date: Fri Feb 18 06:18:17 2000 > Install date: (not installed) Build Host: kenobi.mandrakesoft.com > Group : System Environment/Base Source RPM: (none) > Size: 1218711 > Packager: Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Summary : The Red Hat package management system. > Description : > The Red Hat Package Manager (RPM) is a powerful command line driven > package management system capable of installing, uninstalling, > verifying, querying, and updating software packages. Each software > package consists of an archive of files along with information about > the package like its version, a description, etc. > > --=-=-= > > * Fri Feb 18 2000 Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3.0.4-0.3mdk > > - put back the man pages. > You've included /usr/doc/rpm-3.0.4/manual/Makefile, /usr/doc/rpm-3.0.4/manual/Makefile.in and /usr/doc/rpm-3.0.4/manual/Makefile.am I don't think these files should be there :) Regards, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Cooker] New Widgets for GTK+
Hi, I hope it's the right mailing list :) I've made two new widget to use with GTK+' apps. The first one let the user easily chose a directory. The second one is a 'help' button: a simple button with 'help' written on it. When the user click on it, an helpfile is shown in a window. I think these could be usefull to all MandrakeSoft developpers who use GTK+ Anyhow, I don't know where to put this. It's not an rpm packages yet but it could be. I'm currently makeing a configure script for it. It could go to cooker-contrib, but I rather think it is an internal development tool. What do you think? If you have any particular need for a custom widget. Let me know, I will add it to this package. Regards, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] glib and gtk1.2.7
On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 09:55:57PM +0800, geoffrey lee wrote: > hi, > > ftp> cd incoming > 250 CWD command successful. > ftp> ls g*1.2.7* > 200 PORT command successful. > 150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for file list. > glib-1.2.7-1mdk.src.rpm > gtk+-1.2.7-1mdk.src.rpm > 226 Transfer complete. > 50 bytes received in 0.04 seconds (1.25 Kbytes/sec) > ftp> > > ? > > they're in ftp://ftp.linux-mandrake.com/incoming > If I connect as anonymous, I don't have the right to get them, If I connect as odin, I don't even see them. It seems there're some access problem there :(. DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] glib and gtk1.2.7
On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 08:31:48PM +0800, geoffrey lee wrote: > hi, > > yes, as SRPMS on on ftp://ftp.linux-mandrake.com > Can't find it. Can't find anything in ftp://ftp.linux-mandrake.com by the way. Where should I search? DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] glib and gtk1.2.7
On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 07:35:38PM +0800, geoffrey lee wrote: > hello, > > > i updated glib and gtk to 1.2.7 today, but i don't know who is the > maintainer. > I am. You mean you've already done the packages for Mandrake? DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] DrakeLogo-1.0-3mdk
On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 07:55:22AM -0600, Lenny Cartier wrote: > [Contrib-RPM] > > --=-=-= > Name: DrakeLogo Distribution: Mandrake > Version : 1.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 3mdk Build Date: Wed Feb 16 08:03:07 2000 > Install date: (not installed) Build Host: kenobi.mandrakesoft.com > Group : Utilities/System Source RPM: (none) > Size: 18815 > Packager: Lenny Cartier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Summary : Small utility to easily change the boot-up logo > Description : > DrakeLogo let you easily change the boot-up logo. All you have to do is > to choose a new picture, rebuild your kernel, run lilo silo milo or > others boot loader, and voila! > > --=-=-= > > * Wed Feb 16 2000 Lenny Cartier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > - build on keno > Ahem... Well, how could I say that... I guess I've messed things up :( DrakeLogo is now in cooker and is at 5mdk... Lenny, could you send me what your changes are and/or commit them in the cvs? Chmouel, where do you think should I put DrakeLogo: cooker or contrib? DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] Re: vim-5.6-4mdk
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 10:50:32AM +0100, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > "David Odin (aka DindinX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > or deprecated. Chmouel, what do you think ? > > Should we remove Ctags-3.2 from cooker or should I make a standalone 3.4 > > version ? > > Remove the ctags and provide a news ctags package from vim. > The release I've made yesterday contains ctags in vim-common. I'm afraid I'm not allowed to remove the old ctags-3.2.rpm from cooker. I can upgrade it to the 3.4 version though. But I don't think it is useful to people who don't use vim. Could you delete ctags* from cooker for me, please? Regards, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] MandrakeUpdate-7.0-13mdk
On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 12:13:48AM -0700, Gerald Howse wrote: > great, but where can it be downloaded, the earliest I can f ind is Jan 27th > > Please post in following thread or reply my e-mail and I will post the link. > > SUBJECT LINE: Re: [Cooker] RE: [CHRPM] MandrakeUpdate-7.0-13mdk > > Thanks, others are looking for it as well. > Just a suggestion, but when a new build is done why don't you, > as a matter of practice, include the link to where it can be downloaded? > gfh > The previous mail is an automated message. Everytime we build a new release, a message like this is generated. The url isn't given each time, because, each time, the url is the same. All packages annonced on this list can be found on every cooker mirror on the planet, usually in the /pub/linux/mandrake-devel/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS directory. You'll find a comprehensive list of cooker mirrors on: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/cookerdevel.php3 Hope this helps, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] Re: vim-5.6-4mdk
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 05:31:57PM -0800, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Surely but i think it's hard to fix, why not using the vim-ctags ? > > Because the vim ctags is not available anywhere (Mandrake). I believe > it is culled out of the vim package when the RPM is made. If the > solution is to use the vim ctags then so be it, but if that's the case > then the ctags package needs to deprecated in favour of having ctags > bundled with vim. Unless you want to build the separate ctags package > with the vim ctags that is. > OK. I finally understand this thread!!! It's my fault, it's my own fault. Shame on me... I was wondering why people doesn't use the ctags bundled with the vim RPM. I guess this is because *I* didn't included ctags in the RPM. I'm going to fix this right now. > > This is not a problem localized to me. It is a bug in Linux Mandrake. > Anyone using source with any uppercase identifiers in it will have this > problem. > > This problem really is only one of sorting. Did vim change it's ctags > format requirement from 5.5 to 5.6? Why would they do that? Did the > ctags author change his sort since the last version? Why would he do > that? I guess I am having trouble making sense out of this sudden > incompatibility. > It's a POSIX compatibility fix. The ctags bundled with vim is 3.4, which fixes some bugs. The standalone version of ctags is 3.2 and should be updated or deprecated. Chmouel, what do you think ? Should we remove Ctags-3.2 from cooker or should I make a standalone 3.4 version ? Sorry for this. DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] vim-5.6-4mdk
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 06:12:59PM -0700, Axalon Bloodstone wrote: > On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > > from the quill of DindinX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > --=-=-= > > > Name: vim Distribution: Mandrake > > > Version : 5.6 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > > > Release : 4mdk Build Date: Wed Feb 09 > > > 17:44:54 2000 > > > --=-=-= > > > > > > * Thu Feb 10 2000 DindinX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5.6-4mdk > > > > > > - fix a typo in the call to the ./configure script so more features > > > are now enabled. > > > > I hate to have to keep bringing this up, but how about ctags? Was my > > last description not detailed enough? > > > > b. > > it's ISO stuff :/ > > what we can do is add a provides and conflicts. or even better just name > the nonstd one as such and be done with it Axalon, The problem here is entierly my fault! I didn't put ctags into the vim RPM package... I'm correcting this right now. Expect it before the end of the day. Regards, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] Re: vim-5.6-3mdk
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 02:37:15PM -0600, James H. Cloos Jr. wrote: > One more small buglet in vim-5.6-3mdk: > > Inthe spec file, configure is passed the option --with-max-feature, > where the actual option should be --with-max-features. (note plural > rather than singular.) > > No patch, but `perl -pi -e 's/max-feature/max-features/' vim.spec` > will fix it. > Oups! I've missed that one. It'll be fixed in the next release. Thanks, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] vim-5.6-3mdk
On Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 04:26:21PM -0800, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> from the quill of DindinX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > --=-=-=
> > Name: vim Distribution: Mandrake
> > Version : 5.6 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> > Release : 3mdk Build Date: Sun Feb 06
> > 16:17:46 2000
> > --=-=-=
> >
> > * Sun Feb 06 2000 DindinX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5.6-3mdk
> >
> > - Added support for Chinese/Japanese/Corean support for gvim
> > (Thanks to Pablo)
> > - added a link for the default vimrc.
>
> ctags? Can we plse have ctags fixed? Maybe it is and was
> just not inluded in the changelog.
>
ctags looks good to me :-/
At least, the ctags program that comes with vim works great with wim.
I've seen that we ship a standalone ctags packages that produce a slightly
different format for tags files.
What should I do?
- Fix the standalone ctags package? But this could break other packages
that depends on it.
- Fix vim so it can read standalone ctags files?
AFAIU the documentation, vim ctags is 'exuberant ctags', so it is normal that
it produce a different tags. Vim should be able to read 3 differents format
of tags, though:
1. {tagname} {TAB} {tagfile} {TAB} {tagaddress}
2. {tagfile}:{tagname} {TAB} {tagfile} {TAB} {tagaddress}
3. {tagname} {TAB} {tagfile} {TAB} {tagaddress} {term} {field} ..
vim's ctags produce the last one and vim is happy with it.
Could you please try and tell me what's wrong/what to do?
Thanks,
DindinX
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] Re: vim-5.6-2mdk
On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 09:09:25PM -0800, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > I Cc: to dindin our (new) maintenner of vim. > > Cool! Thanx. > Ok. I'll have a look at this ASAP. DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] grpmi-0.9-12mdk anytime soon?
On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 09:21:27PM -0800, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > How long after a new package is cut should it show up on the mirrors? > > I am (im-)patiently awaiting the arrival of grpmi-0.9-12mdk so that I > can test it with some local changes here. I actually need it so I can > release my test case and get some work done that is depending on my test > case. Stuff's starting to back up behind the test case. :-) > Isn't grpmi part of MandrakeUpdate? I am currently redesigning MandrakeUpdate and grpmi. Have a look in the CVS. Alas, I don't make rpm (I still don't know how to make em). Pixel, could you make a rpm out of the grpmi from the CVS? Regards, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] Re: grpmi is core dumping
On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 04:26:47PM -0800, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > from the quill of Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > writes: > > > > > On Oxygen when I execute: > > > > > > grpmi > > >http://rpmfind.net/linux/MandrakeCooker/oxygen/Mandrake/RPMS//bc-1.05a-7mdk.i586.rpm > > > > > > I am getting a sigsegv and a core dump. That would be why my > > rpmdrake > > > does not work. > > > > > > > thanks, fixed! (in 12mdk) > > Great. Available when? Where (what mirrors) first? I have a bug or > two in urpmi fixed (other than the one I have still to discuss with the > "--") that I want to test with rpmdrake/grmpi before I submit a patch. > > Thanx. > b. > Could you please CC: me any change you made with grpmi (or grpmi.c+grpmi.pm), as I may need them for the Mandrake Update 7.1 package I'm developping just now? Thanks, DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] Lothar SoundConfig 0.6.5
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 07:13:59PM -0500, Steve Fox wrote: Alexandre Dussart wrote: > > Hi! > > Lothar SoundConfig 0.6.5 is available now. Here're the changes: > > -Better handling configuration. > -Many fixes(don't use dma16 when module doesn't support it) > -SBLive! support(need test) > > You must install new detect 0.9.29-5mdk version(new cards supported). > > Please test and report, any bugs or suggestion(if no bug ;) > > Thanks, >Alex. > > PS: Sorry if you got two times this mail, but I don't know if you're > in cooker list or not... > > -- > MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/ >--Alexandre Sorry to ask, but where could I find Lothar SoundConfig 0.6.5 and detect 0.9.29-5mdk? I've looked for it in the linux-mandrake web site and cannot find it :( DindinX P.S: I wish to test if it correctly detect Pro Audio Spectrum 16. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Cooker] Problems with Pro Audio SoundCard
Hi, I'm using Oxygen, release of 12/28/1999 I've just noted that the Mediavision (Pro Audio Spectrum 16) sound card isn't in the list of soundconfig. And there're problems with insmoding it by hand: [root@localhost ~]# insmod soundcore [root@localhost ~]# insmod soundlow [root@localhost ~]# insmod sound [root@localhost ~]# insmod pas2 /lib/modules/2.2.14-11mdk/misc/pas2.o: init_module: Périphérique ou ressource occupé The same sound card works perfectly with Debian/kernel-2.3.36 Any clue? DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Cooker] WindowMaker does not like kppp.
Hi, When I use kppp (isn't there another tool to start a ppp connection, in text mode, as pon?) with WindowMaker, it often happens that WindowMaker segfault and restart. It doesn't happens with other Windows Managers. DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
