Re: FIXED Kernel compile problems
Went ahead and gave it a try. These messages are apparently only a warning. The kernel will compile properly. I am currently writing from the system booted with the new kernel. lance Lance Hoffmeyer wrote: Hey all, I am running Linux version 2.6.8-11-amd64-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.4.4 20050314 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-13)) I want to recompile the kernel mainly because I want framebuffer support. Using make-kpkg I get the following warning: $make-kpkg --initrd --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image dpkg-architecture: warning: Unknown gcc system type x86_64-linux-gnu, falling back to default (native compilation) dpkg-architecture: warning: Specified GNU system type x86_64-linux does not match gcc system type x86_64-linux-gnu. dpkg-architecture: warning: Unknown gcc system type x86_64-linux-gnu, falling back to default (native compilation) Is it true?: Please ignore the warning about overriding and ignoring targets above. These are harmless. They are only invoked in a part of the process that tries to snarf variable values for the conf.vars file. Lance -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kernel compile problems
Hey all, I am running Linux version 2.6.8-11-amd64-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.4.4 20050314 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-13)) I want to recompile the kernel mainly because I want framebuffer support. Using make-kpkg I get the following warning: $make-kpkg --initrd --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image dpkg-architecture: warning: Unknown gcc system type x86_64-linux-gnu, falling back to default (native compilation) dpkg-architecture: warning: Specified GNU system type x86_64-linux does not match gcc system type x86_64-linux-gnu. dpkg-architecture: warning: Unknown gcc system type x86_64-linux-gnu, falling back to default (native compilation) Is it true?: Please ignore the warning about overriding and ignoring targets above. These are harmless. They are only invoked in a part of the process that tries to snarf variable values for the conf.vars file. Lance -- Lance Hoffmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and governments to gain ground. - Thomas Jefferson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with new Ati graphic drivers
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:23:33 +0200, Sylvain Archenault a écrit : >[...] > But i can't load the module, here is the output : > > $modprobe fglrx > FATAL: Error inserting fglrx > (/lib/modules/2.6.12.2/kernel/drivers/char/drm/fglrx.ko): No such device > > $dmesg Trying to register duplicated ioctl32 handler c0246400 > [fglrx:firegl_init_32compat_ioctls] *ERROR* unable to register ioctl32 0 > [fglrx:firegl_init] *ERROR* Couldn't register compat32 ioctls! > [fglrx] Maximum main memory to use for locked dma buffers: 365 MBytes. > ACPI: PCI Interrupt :01:00.0[A] -> Link [LNKE] -> GSI 17 (level, > low) -> IRQ 17 > Trying to register duplicated ioctl32 handler c0246400 > [fglrx:firegl_init_32compat_ioctls] *ERROR* unable to register ioctl32 0 > [fglrx:firegl_init] *ERROR* Couldn't register compat32 ioctls Do you use a home-made kernel? Do the versions (kernel, headers, sources, whatever) match? Did you try to reboot? > As the server starts correctly, openGL acceleration is not loaded. > > I suppose the problem come from ioctl32.h ? > > Do you experience the same problem ? No. Everything seems ok for me now. -- Sylvain Sauvage
Re: Problems with new Ati graphic drivers
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:57:41 +0200, Michelasso a écrit : > >[...] > Ok, I solved: I had a problem with the libraries in /usr/X11R6/lib and > /usr/X11R6/lib64; now the server works correctly (commenting out > int10) I didn't get those errors but your message made me think about a note Flavio Stanchina wrote about a symlink /usr/X11R6/lib64 the package doesn't make. I tried again: making the symlink and disabling int10. So far so good. I don't understand the previous packages (.deb made with Flavio's sources) worked very well without those tricks. Those ATI drivers seem very well developped and the installer is perfect... -- Sylvain Sauvage
Re: OPenoffice libs cannot be found
Am Freitag, 26. August 2005 22:29 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow: > Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hello, > > > > when I try to install openoffice I get these message. Sorry, it is in > > German, but this should be no problem. > > > > Message: > > apt-get install openoffice.org-bin > > Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig > > Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut... Fertig > > Einige Pakete konnten nicht installiert werden. Das kann bedeuten, dass > > Sie eine unmögliche Situation angefordert haben oder dass, wenn Sie die > > instabile Distribution verwenden, einige erforderliche Pakete noch nicht > > kreiert oder aus Incoming herausbewegt wurden. > > > > Da Sie nur eine einzige Operation angefordert haben ist es sehr > > wahrscheinlich, > > dass das Paket einfach nicht installierbar ist und eine Fehlermeldung > > über dieses Paket erfolgen sollte. > > Die folgenden Informationen helfen Ihnen vielleicht, die Situation zu > > lösen: > > > > Die folgenden Pakete haben nichterfüllte Abhängigkeiten: > > openoffice.org-bin: Hängt ab: ia32-libdb4.2 ist aber nicht > > installierbar Hängt ab: ia32-libmyspell3 ist aber nicht installierbar > > Hängt ab: ia32-libwpd8 ist aber nicht installierbar Hängt ab: > > openoffice.org (> 1.1.3+1.1.4) aber 1.1.2-2.0.1 soll installiert werden > > E: Kaputte Pakete > > > > Where are those libs ? They are not in Debian-AMD64. > > > > Regards > > > > Hans > > And where did you get openoffice.org-bin from? > > Those depends sound suspiciously like the OOo created by my > amd64-archive package. That one has a bug with sid since OOo has > different depends there. > > MfG > Goswin Hi Goswin, I got Openoffice from the original Debian-AMD64 site ! O.k., I admit, it was a little tricky to install it, but it runs ! How did I do ? Well, I downloaded the debs manually, then installed them with the --force-overwite option. I first installed the openoffice-ia32-libs, then the opneoffice.org-debian-files (as I remember, there was a site, which described that more specific). Look at my name in the mailing lists, somwhere I described, how I did. Openoffice is working now, but I cannot upgrade due to the missing ia32-libs (see above) I think, they must exist somewhere, due they are mentioned in the dependencies. If someone is interested, how I managed to get openoffice run on this machine, I will like to describe it again ! :))) Best regards Hans -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OPenoffice libs cannot be found
Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > when I try to install openoffice I get these message. Sorry, it is in German, > but this should be no problem. > > Message: > apt-get install openoffice.org-bin > Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig > Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut... Fertig > Einige Pakete konnten nicht installiert werden. Das kann bedeuten, dass > Sie eine unmögliche Situation angefordert haben oder dass, wenn Sie die > instabile Distribution verwenden, einige erforderliche Pakete noch nicht > kreiert oder aus Incoming herausbewegt wurden. > > Da Sie nur eine einzige Operation angefordert haben ist es sehr > wahrscheinlich, > dass das Paket einfach nicht installierbar ist und eine Fehlermeldung über > dieses Paket erfolgen sollte. > Die folgenden Informationen helfen Ihnen vielleicht, die Situation zu lösen: > > Die folgenden Pakete haben nichterfüllte Abhängigkeiten: > openoffice.org-bin: Hängt ab: ia32-libdb4.2 ist aber nicht installierbar > Hängt ab: ia32-libmyspell3 ist aber nicht installierbar > Hängt ab: ia32-libwpd8 ist aber nicht installierbar > Hängt ab: openoffice.org (> 1.1.3+1.1.4) aber > 1.1.2-2.0.1 soll installiert werden > E: Kaputte Pakete > > Where are those libs ? They are not in Debian-AMD64. > > Regards > > Hans And where did you get openoffice.org-bin from? Those depends sound suspiciously like the OOo created by my amd64-archive package. That one has a bug with sid since OOo has different depends there. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: all debian installer stopp in the boot section on amd64
"Stefanow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > can you send me the drivers for the MSI 7010? > > regards > Stefanow Can you send me an MSI 7010 so I can find the right once? MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Error while compiling kernel....
Ngo Trung Nhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When compiling linux-source-2.6.12 I got such en error: > > arch/x86_64/kernel/built-in.o: In function `vsyscall_sysctl_change': > vsyscall.c:(.text+0x787c): undefined reference to `vsysc1' > vsyscall.c:(.text+0x78c6): undefined reference to `vsysc2' > make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.12' > make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2 > > I've tried with different versions of gcc (gcc3.3, gcc3.4, gcc4.0) but > it still doesn't work. What's strange here ? Can anybody help me? > My system is debian -amd64 sid, kernel 2.6.11 Is that an upstream 2.6.12 or the debian source package? Use the later. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OPenoffice libs cannot be found
Am Freitag, 26. August 2005 20:48 schrieb Hans: > Hello, > > when I try to install openoffice I get these message. Sorry, it is in > German, but this should be no problem. > ... > Die folgenden Pakete haben nichterfüllte Abhängigkeiten: > openoffice.org-bin: Hängt ab: ia32-libdb4.2 ist aber nicht installierbar > Hängt ab: ia32-libmyspell3 ist aber nicht > installierbar Hängt ab: ia32-libwpd8 ist aber nicht installierbar Hängt ab: > openoffice.org (> 1.1.3+1.1.4) aber 1.1.2-2.0.1 soll installiert werden > E: Kaputte Pakete > > Where are those libs ? They are not in Debian-AMD64. There are no official OpenOffice packages in the AMD64 distribution, as far as i am aware. There exists a package though, that will provide all necessary 32bit libraries + OpenOffice, so you can run it as a 32bit application (no chroot needed). This package is called something like "amd64-archive" and was provided on this list by Goswin von Brederlow. Try to search for the thread ... I am running OpenOffice 32bit with the help of this package.
Re: problems with util-linux.
Chris Wakefield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all. > > I'm stuck with util-linux interrupting upgrades and installations, even > manual > installations as well. > > I've tried: apt-get -f install and installing util-linux manually, but I get > the same interruption. > > Does anyone have any ideas to deal with this? downgrade util-linux? > Thanks for any input, > Chris W. > > __ > OUTPUT: > > 163 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 40 not upgraded. > 2 not fully installed or removed. > Need to get 0B/134MB of archives. > After unpacking 39.8MB of additional disk space will be used. > Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y > Reading changelogs... Done > /bin/sh: line 1: 16614 Illegal instruction /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure > --apt > (Reading database ... > dpkg: serious warning: files list file for package `mysql-server-4.1' > missing, > assuming package has no files currently installed. > 142219 files and directories currently installed.) > Preparing to replace util-linux 2.12p-4.0.0.1.pure64 > (using .../util-linux_2.12p-7_amd64.deb) ... > Unpacking replacement util-linux ... > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/util-linux_2.12p-7_amd64.deb > (--unpack): > unable to make backup link of > `./usr/share/doc/util-linux/examples/getopt-parse.bash.gz' before installing > new version: Too many links What does ls -lhd /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/util-linux /usr/share/doc/util-linux/examples /usr/share/doc/util-linux/examples/getopt-parse.bash.gz say? > /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/postrm: line 16: 16627 Illegal instruction > update-mime That sounds bad. Is your perl now broken? > dpkg: error while cleaning up: > subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 132 > Errors were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/util-linux_2.12p-7_amd64.deb > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Does anyone else get this? MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Some binaries using /lib/ld.so instead of /lib64/ld.so
Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Both less versions are compiled with the same libc and ld. Where does >> your less come from? > > Probably from my first attempts at installing Debian/AMD64 in february. > There were several flavours available and at some point I installed > packages from several of them. > > I reinstalled less and several other packages and now I have the same > ld.so linkage as you. Thanks ! > > However, this still does not fixes libc6. I reinstalled the package > (see below for version info) and I still get the wrong linkage for 7 > binaries included in the package: > > $ ldd `dlocate -L libc6 |grep /bin/` |grep ld-linux > /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0030f490) > /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0030f490) > /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0030f490) > /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0030f490) > /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0030f490) > /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0030f490) > /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0030f490) > > Do you get the same thing ? Yes, both Kurt and I get the same thing for libc6. > If yes, should I report a bug ? I believe this is a known issue and cause by glibc being compiled for /lib. Is it a problem or just some warnings when prelinking? There should be no need to copy those binaries to another system so strict compatibility there isn't relay needed. The problem should resolve itself when glibc changes to multiarch paths at the latest. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Evolution doesn't start anymore because of a dbus problem
Are you sure this is related to amd64 ? or even Debian ?
Maybe you would get a beter answer if you would search on the Evolution site.
Anyway, after a quick reading through your mail I would try :
- Remove package evolution-plugins;
- Start evolution;
- Search for and un-check evil option about sending a message to dbus;
- Re-install package evolution-plugins.
And don't you _ever_ touch that check box again ;o)
Alternatively figure out which of the many plugins is attempting the evil
deed, and ... shoot it ('rm' will work too).
If it doesn't help, sorry.
Ernest.
On Friday 26 August 2005 17:54, Michelasso wrote:
> Hello,
> I have had the really bad idea to check the option "send a d-bus
> message" (or something similar) in the Evolution preferences and now
> it crashes immediately at every startup giving me this message:
>
> Failed to connect to the D-BUS daemon: Unable to determine the address
> of the message bus
> 4949: arguments to dbus_connection_get_data() were incorrect,
> assertion "connection != NULL" failed in file dbus-connection.c line
> 4029.
> This is normally a bug in some application using the D-BUS library.
> 4949: arguments to dbus_connection_set_watch_functions() were
> incorrect, assertion "connection != NULL" failed in file
> dbus-connection.c line 3320.
> This is normally a bug in some application using the D-BUS library.
>
> ** ERROR **: Not enough memory to set up DBusConnection for use with GLib
>
> I cannot uncheck that option since the program crashes immediately; I
> have looked in my .evolution directory for some preferences file that
> I could modify to disable that option, but I haven't found nothing.
> The only way I have found to have evolution working again is to remove
> the package evolution-plugins, but in this way I am, of course, losing
> all other plugins.
>
> The dbus related packages I have installed are:
> |/ Name VersionDescription
>
> +++-==-==-=
>=== ri dbus-1 0.23.4-6 simple interprocess messaging system
> pn dbus-1-dev (no description available)
> pn dbus-1-doc (no description available)
> ii dbus-1-utils 0.23.4-6 simple interprocess messaging system
> (utilit ri dbus-glib-10.23.4-6 simple interprocess messaging
> system (GLib-b pn dbus-glib-1-de (no description available)
> ri dbus-qt-1 0.23.4-3 simple interprocess messaging system
> (Qt-bas pn dbus-qt-1-dev (no description available)
>
> Any suggestion to have evolution plugins back will be appreciated.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OPenoffice libs cannot be found
Hello, when I try to install openoffice I get these message. Sorry, it is in German, but this should be no problem. Message: apt-get install openoffice.org-bin Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut... Fertig Einige Pakete konnten nicht installiert werden. Das kann bedeuten, dass Sie eine unmögliche Situation angefordert haben oder dass, wenn Sie die instabile Distribution verwenden, einige erforderliche Pakete noch nicht kreiert oder aus Incoming herausbewegt wurden. Da Sie nur eine einzige Operation angefordert haben ist es sehr wahrscheinlich, dass das Paket einfach nicht installierbar ist und eine Fehlermeldung über dieses Paket erfolgen sollte. Die folgenden Informationen helfen Ihnen vielleicht, die Situation zu lösen: Die folgenden Pakete haben nichterfüllte Abhängigkeiten: openoffice.org-bin: Hängt ab: ia32-libdb4.2 ist aber nicht installierbar Hängt ab: ia32-libmyspell3 ist aber nicht installierbar Hängt ab: ia32-libwpd8 ist aber nicht installierbar Hängt ab: openoffice.org (> 1.1.3+1.1.4) aber 1.1.2-2.0.1 soll installiert werden E: Kaputte Pakete Where are those libs ? They are not in Debian-AMD64. Regards Hans -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with new Ati graphic drivers
Michelasso wrote: > On 8/24/05, Michelasso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>But the server doesn't work correctly, since I get this from fglrxinfo: >> >> >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ fglrxinfo >>ERROR: DDX driver parameter mismatch: got 840 bytes, but expected 832 bytes. >>libGL error: InitDriver failed >>display: :0.0 screen: 0 >>OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org >>OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect >>OpenGL version string: 1.2 (1.5 Mesa 6.2.1) >> > > > Ok, I solved: I had a problem with the libraries in /usr/X11R6/lib and > /usr/X11R6/lib64; now the server works correctly (commenting out > int10) > > Well i manage to compile the module after make the symlink for asm/ioctl32.h. But i can't load the module, here is the output : $modprobe fglrx FATAL: Error inserting fglrx (/lib/modules/2.6.12.2/kernel/drivers/char/drm/fglrx.ko): No such device $dmesg Trying to register duplicated ioctl32 handler c0246400 [fglrx:firegl_init_32compat_ioctls] *ERROR* unable to register ioctl32 0 [fglrx:firegl_init] *ERROR* Couldn't register compat32 ioctls! [fglrx] Maximum main memory to use for locked dma buffers: 365 MBytes. ACPI: PCI Interrupt :01:00.0[A] -> Link [LNKE] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 Trying to register duplicated ioctl32 handler c0246400 [fglrx:firegl_init_32compat_ioctls] *ERROR* unable to register ioctl32 0 [fglrx:firegl_init] *ERROR* Couldn't register compat32 ioctls As the server starts correctly, openGL acceleration is not loaded. I suppose the problem come from ioctl32.h ? Do you experience the same problem ? -- Sylvain Archenault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: scsi tape
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 05:13:57PM +0100, Dr Gavin Seddon wrote: > I have scsi tape drive here and it isn't recognised by the system. Can > anyone tell me which kernel/module to install. module name: st (for scsi tape) Perhaps sg is handy too (scsi generic). I haven't used a scsi tape drive in a while. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
scsi tape
Dear list, I have scsi tape drive here and it isn't recognised by the system. Can anyone tell me which kernel/module to install. Thanks Gavin. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Evolution doesn't start anymore because of a dbus problem
Hello, I have had the really bad idea to check the option "send a d-bus message" (or something similar) in the Evolution preferences and now it crashes immediately at every startup giving me this message: Failed to connect to the D-BUS daemon: Unable to determine the address of the message bus 4949: arguments to dbus_connection_get_data() were incorrect, assertion "connection != NULL" failed in file dbus-connection.c line 4029. This is normally a bug in some application using the D-BUS library. 4949: arguments to dbus_connection_set_watch_functions() were incorrect, assertion "connection != NULL" failed in file dbus-connection.c line 3320. This is normally a bug in some application using the D-BUS library. ** ERROR **: Not enough memory to set up DBusConnection for use with GLib I cannot uncheck that option since the program crashes immediately; I have looked in my .evolution directory for some preferences file that I could modify to disable that option, but I haven't found nothing. The only way I have found to have evolution working again is to remove the package evolution-plugins, but in this way I am, of course, losing all other plugins. The dbus related packages I have installed are: |/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- ri dbus-1 0.23.4-6 simple interprocess messaging system pn dbus-1-dev (no description available) pn dbus-1-doc (no description available) ii dbus-1-utils 0.23.4-6 simple interprocess messaging system (utilit ri dbus-glib-10.23.4-6 simple interprocess messaging system (GLib-b pn dbus-glib-1-de (no description available) ri dbus-qt-1 0.23.4-3 simple interprocess messaging system (Qt-bas pn dbus-qt-1-dev (no description available) Any suggestion to have evolution plugins back will be appreciated.
Re: motherboard compatibility
ok thx for your quick answer Lennart Sorensen a écrit : >On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 03:15:50PM +0200, kohzak wrote: > > >>I would like to know if the motherboard* *Gigabyte GA-K8V Ultra-939 (VIA >>K8T800 Pro) - ATX work fine under debian amd64 because it don't appear >>on http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/27/ >> >> > >Well I have an Asus A8V Deluxe, which uses the VIA K8T800 chipset, and >everything works great for me so far. I doubt gigabyte did anything >wrong in the design that would make it not work. > >The network on the asus is a gigabit marvell yuken pci chip, which works >fine. Some newer models use a PCIe model which requires a kernel newer >than 2.6.8 to work apparently. > >Len Sorensen > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: all debian installer stopp in the boot section on amd64
Hello, can you send me the drivers for the MSI 7010? regards Stefanow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Error while compiling kernel....
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 06:36:07AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I encountered a similar error. It appears to just be a problem with that > version of the kernel. Try kicking up to 2.6.13-rc6 or rc7. I bet it will > compile. FWIW, I'm running a kernel.org 2.6.12.3 kernel on a dual AMD64 and it has been stable for 22 days right now. Erik -- +-- Erik Mouw -- www.harddisk-recovery.com -- +31 70 370 12 90 -- | Lab address: Delftechpark 26, 2628 XH, Delft, The Netherlands -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dpkg-architecture issues/vmware
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 03:41:50AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I did have 1.10.28 from sarge, but I upgraded gcc to build a package earlier. > I will change the link to point to the right one. > > I got dpkg from amd64.debian.net unstable, I think. But I may be wrong. Downgrading dpkg will cause some trouble. You will have to remove the 'log' line from the dpkg config in /etc/dpkg/ after downgrading or dpkg won't run anymore. > Thanks for your help. > > Also - forgive the newbie question - but can someone tell me how to > 'downgrade' a package? Is it a matter of removing it completely then picking > the right apt source to install from? You can either: apt-get install package/stable or apt-get install package=versionnumber Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: motherboard compatibility
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 03:15:50PM +0200, kohzak wrote: > I would like to know if the motherboard* *Gigabyte GA-K8V Ultra-939 (VIA > K8T800 Pro) - ATX work fine under debian amd64 because it don't appear > on http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/27/ Well I have an Asus A8V Deluxe, which uses the VIA K8T800 chipset, and everything works great for me so far. I doubt gigabyte did anything wrong in the design that would make it not work. The network on the asus is a gigabit marvell yuken pci chip, which works fine. Some newer models use a PCIe model which requires a kernel newer than 2.6.8 to work apparently. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
motherboard compatibility
hi all I would like to know if the motherboard* *Gigabyte GA-K8V Ultra-939 (VIA K8T800 Pro) - ATX work fine under debian amd64 because it don't appear on http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/27/ thx > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Error while compiling kernel....
Hi, I encountered a similar error. It appears to just be a problem with that version of the kernel. Try kicking up to 2.6.13-rc6 or rc7. I bet it will compile. -Jason H. Quoting Tim Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: how are you compiling the debian kernel? with fakeroot or on your own. you may need a few more .deb's installed. tim Ngo Trung Nhan wrote: When compiling linux-source-2.6.12 I got such en error: arch/x86_64/kernel/built-in.o: In function `vsyscall_sysctl_change': vsyscall.c:(.text+0x787c): undefined reference to `vsysc1' vsyscall.c:(.text+0x78c6): undefined reference to `vsysc2' make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.12' make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2 I've tried with different versions of gcc (gcc3.3, gcc3.4, gcc4.0) but it still doesn't work. What's strange here ? Can anybody help me? My system is debian -amd64 sid, kernel 2.6.11 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Error while compiling kernel....
how are you compiling the debian kernel? with fakeroot or on your own. you may need a few more .deb's installed. tim Ngo Trung Nhan wrote: When compiling linux-source-2.6.12 I got such en error: arch/x86_64/kernel/built-in.o: In function `vsyscall_sysctl_change': vsyscall.c:(.text+0x787c): undefined reference to `vsysc1' vsyscall.c:(.text+0x78c6): undefined reference to `vsysc2' make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.12' make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2 I've tried with different versions of gcc (gcc3.3, gcc3.4, gcc4.0) but it still doesn't work. What's strange here ? Can anybody help me? My system is debian -amd64 sid, kernel 2.6.11 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Error while compiling kernel....
When compiling linux-source-2.6.12 I got such en error: arch/x86_64/kernel/built-in.o: In function `vsyscall_sysctl_change': vsyscall.c:(.text+0x787c): undefined reference to `vsysc1' vsyscall.c:(.text+0x78c6): undefined reference to `vsysc2' make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.12' make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2 I've tried with different versions of gcc (gcc3.3, gcc3.4, gcc4.0) but it still doesn't work. What's strange here ? Can anybody help me? My system is debian -amd64 sid, kernel 2.6.11
Xen on amd64
I noticed there's an unstable release of Xen on xensource.org for amd64. Has anyone tried this? I have an amd64 box I want to use as a dev system, running 64-bit Debian, but I need to develop a small custom distro for a thin client system. I thought maybe I could install Xen and then put AMD64 Debian and a 32-bit-something-else on it. Simon
Re: Problems with new Ati graphic drivers
On 8/24/05, Michelasso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But the server doesn't work correctly, since I get this from fglrxinfo: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ fglrxinfo > ERROR: DDX driver parameter mismatch: got 840 bytes, but expected 832 bytes. > libGL error: InitDriver failed > display: :0.0 screen: 0 > OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org > OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect > OpenGL version string: 1.2 (1.5 Mesa 6.2.1) > Ok, I solved: I had a problem with the libraries in /usr/X11R6/lib and /usr/X11R6/lib64; now the server works correctly (commenting out int10)
Re: dpkg-architecture issues/vmware
I did have 1.10.28 from sarge, but I upgraded gcc to build a package earlier. I will change the link to point to the right one. I got dpkg from amd64.debian.net unstable, I think. But I may be wrong. Thanks for your help. Also - forgive the newbie question - but can someone tell me how to 'downgrade' a package? Is it a matter of removing it completely then picking the right apt source to install from? Simon Kurt Roeckx wrote .. > On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 12:35:07AM +0100, Simon Guerrero wrote: > > Hi > > > > Around the same time, I noticed something odd about dpkg. > > dpkg-architecture (at version 1.13.1.11 of dpkg) gives: > > Where did you get that version of dpkg? In sarge it's 1.10.28 in > sid it's 1.13.11 and in etch is should be 1.13.10. > > > dpkg-architecture > > dpkg-architecture: warning: Unknown gcc system type x86_64-linux-gnu, > > falling back to default (native compilation) > > dpkg-architecture: warning: Specified GNU system type x86_64-linux does > > not match gcc system type x86_64-linux-gnu. > > This means your gcc and dpkg do not have a version that go > together. > > > Kurt > > >
Re: kde remote desktop (krfb & krdc) under amd64: anyone using it successfully ?
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:44:42PM -0400, James D. Freels wrote: >Yes ! Very good ! This fixed the problem. Great. >I simply changed the quality from high to medium. I interpreted this >parameter as the network speed. I am not sure why it fixes it, but it >does. The high quality uses another compression method, when I remember correct. And that one is broken in Debian since KDE 3.1.4:-( ciao, Dirk -- | Akkuschrauber Kaufberatung and AEG GSM stuff | | Visit my homepage: http://www.nutrimatic.ping.de/ | | FIDO: Dirk Salva 2:244/6305.10 Internet: dsalvaATgmx.de | |The "Ruhrgebiet", best place to live in Germany! | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
