Re: [2.1.x] Code freeze and start of the release process (was Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12)
On 14/03/2013 15:56, Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi, BTW, how could I have write access on the wiki ? Who are administrators ? A while ago [2] we set up with Infra some security for our wiki: if you want write access you need to be enlisted as contributor in [3]; any PMC member can also be added to [4] thus becoming administrator. Please tell me your username and I will add it to [3] or [4], as you prefer. My user name on the Wiki is CedricDamioli Added to [3]. Regards. Regards. Le 05/03/2013 11:18, Cédric Damioli a écrit : Hi team, Ok, does this mean we can start rolling this long-waited 2.1.12??!? Cédric, are you ready? Let's go ! We are now in the process of releasing 2.1.12 in the next few days, so please don't check anything in in the 2.1.x branch. I'll try to follow [1] as much as possible. Best regards, Cédric [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonReleaseHowTo [2] http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-Spam-on-Cocoon-wiki---Fwd%3A--Cocoon-Wiki--Trivial-Update-of-%22FrontPage%22-by-wikimouse-p33732277.html [3] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/ContributorsGroup [4] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/AdminGroup -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [2.1.x] Code freeze and start of the release process (was Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12)
Hi, BTW, how could I have write access on the wiki ? Who are administrators ? A while ago [2] we set up with Infra some security for our wiki: if you want write access you need to be enlisted as contributor in [3]; any PMC member can also be added to [4] thus becoming administrator. Please tell me your username and I will add it to [3] or [4], as you prefer. My user name on the Wiki is CedricDamioli Thanks, Cédric Regards. Le 05/03/2013 11:18, Cédric Damioli a écrit : Hi team, Ok, does this mean we can start rolling this long-waited 2.1.12??!? Cédric, are you ready? Let's go ! We are now in the process of releasing 2.1.12 in the next few days, so please don't check anything in in the 2.1.x branch. I'll try to follow [1] as much as possible. Best regards, Cédric [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonReleaseHowTo [2] http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-Spam-on-Cocoon-wiki---Fwd%3A--Cocoon-Wiki--Trivial-Update-of-%22FrontPage%22-by-wikimouse-p33732277.html [3] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/ContributorsGroup [4] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/AdminGroup
Re: [2.1.x] Code freeze and start of the release process (was Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12)
Le 11/03/2013 17:37, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : I was able to 1. download all files 2. check ASC signatures and MD5 / SHA1 hashes 3. (either for zip and tar.gz) extract src, try to build and got message about missing dependencies 4. (either for zip and tar.gz) extract deps, successfully build, run and browse samples If this was a formal vote, I would have given my +1 Nice job! Looking forward for the actual vote. Regards. Thanks for your feedback. I hope to be able to tag the SVN, rebuild the files, and launch the formal vote later today. Regards, -- Cédric Damioli Ametys CMS http://www.ametys.org http://www.anyware-services.com
Re: [2.1.x] Code freeze and start of the release process (was Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12)
On 11/03/2013 11:18, Cédric Damioli wrote: Le 11/03/2013 11:12, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 09/03/2013 12:36, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: On 08/03/2013 20:28, Cédric Damioli wrote: Hello, I just uploaded the release material at http://people.apache.org/~cdamioli/cocoon/ Before starting a formal vote, could some of you download and test the files (signatures, installation, samples, ...) ? I'll do this on Monday. I cannot download almost any file (but some .asc) from the given location: 403 Forbidden ouuups, sorry This should be better now. I was able to 1. download all files 2. check ASC signatures and MD5 / SHA1 hashes 3. (either for zip and tar.gz) extract src, try to build and got message about missing dependencies 4. (either for zip and tar.gz) extract deps, successfully build, run and browse samples If this was a formal vote, I would have given my +1 Nice job! Looking forward for the actual vote. Regards. I saw some broken samples, all related to some external sources (RSS feeds, SOAP servers, ...). I don't know if this may be considered blocker for the release. I don't think so... BTW, how could I have write access on the wiki ? Who are administrators ? A while ago [2] we set up with Infra some security for our wiki: if you want write access you need to be enlisted as contributor in [3]; any PMC member can also be added to [4] thus becoming administrator. Please tell me your username and I will add it to [3] or [4], as you prefer. Regards. Le 05/03/2013 11:18, Cédric Damioli a écrit : Hi team, Ok, does this mean we can start rolling this long-waited 2.1.12??!? Cédric, are you ready? Let's go ! We are now in the process of releasing 2.1.12 in the next few days, so please don't check anything in in the 2.1.x branch. I'll try to follow [1] as much as possible. Best regards, Cédric [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonReleaseHowTo [2] http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-Spam-on-Cocoon-wiki---Fwd%3A--Cocoon-Wiki--Trivial-Update-of-%22FrontPage%22-by-wikimouse-p33732277.html [3] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/ContributorsGroup [4] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/AdminGroup -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [2.1.x] Code freeze and start of the release process (was Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12)
Le 11/03/2013 11:12, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 09/03/2013 12:36, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: On 08/03/2013 20:28, Cédric Damioli wrote: Hello, I just uploaded the release material at http://people.apache.org/~cdamioli/cocoon/ Before starting a formal vote, could some of you download and test the files (signatures, installation, samples, ...) ? I'll do this on Monday. I cannot download almost any file (but some .asc) from the given location: 403 Forbidden ouuups, sorry This should be better now. I saw some broken samples, all related to some external sources (RSS feeds, SOAP servers, ...). I don't know if this may be considered blocker for the release. I don't think so... BTW, how could I have write access on the wiki ? Who are administrators ? A while ago [2] we set up with Infra some security for our wiki: if you want write access you need to be enlisted as contributor in [3]; any PMC member can also be added to [4] thus becoming administrator. Please tell me your username and I will add it to [3] or [4], as you prefer. Regards. Le 05/03/2013 11:18, Cédric Damioli a écrit : Hi team, Ok, does this mean we can start rolling this long-waited 2.1.12??!? Cédric, are you ready? Let's go ! We are now in the process of releasing 2.1.12 in the next few days, so please don't check anything in in the 2.1.x branch. I'll try to follow [1] as much as possible. Best regards, Cédric [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonReleaseHowTo [2] http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-Spam-on-Cocoon-wiki---Fwd%3A--Cocoon-Wiki--Trivial-Update-of-%22FrontPage%22-by-wikimouse-p33732277.html [3] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/ContributorsGroup [4] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/AdminGroup -- Cédric Damioli Ametys CMS http://www.ametys.org http://www.anyware-services.com
Re: [2.1.x] Code freeze and start of the release process (was Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12)
On 09/03/2013 12:36, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: On 08/03/2013 20:28, Cédric Damioli wrote: Hello, I just uploaded the release material at http://people.apache.org/~cdamioli/cocoon/ Before starting a formal vote, could some of you download and test the files (signatures, installation, samples, ...) ? I'll do this on Monday. I cannot download almost any file (but some .asc) from the given location: 403 Forbidden I saw some broken samples, all related to some external sources (RSS feeds, SOAP servers, ...). I don't know if this may be considered blocker for the release. I don't think so... BTW, how could I have write access on the wiki ? Who are administrators ? A while ago [2] we set up with Infra some security for our wiki: if you want write access you need to be enlisted as contributor in [3]; any PMC member can also be added to [4] thus becoming administrator. Please tell me your username and I will add it to [3] or [4], as you prefer. Regards. Le 05/03/2013 11:18, Cédric Damioli a écrit : Hi team, Ok, does this mean we can start rolling this long-waited 2.1.12??!? Cédric, are you ready? Let's go ! We are now in the process of releasing 2.1.12 in the next few days, so please don't check anything in in the 2.1.x branch. I'll try to follow [1] as much as possible. Best regards, Cédric [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonReleaseHowTo [2] http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-Spam-on-Cocoon-wiki---Fwd%3A--Cocoon-Wiki--Trivial-Update-of-%22FrontPage%22-by-wikimouse-p33732277.html [3] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/ContributorsGroup [4] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/AdminGroup -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [2.1.x] Code freeze and start of the release process (was Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12)
On 08/03/2013 20:28, Cédric Damioli wrote: Hello, I just uploaded the release material at http://people.apache.org/~cdamioli/cocoon/ Before starting a formal vote, could some of you download and test the files (signatures, installation, samples, ...) ? I'll so this on Monday. I saw some broken samples, all related to some external sources (RSS feeds, SOAP servers, ...). I don't know if this may be considered blocker for the release. I don't think so... BTW, how could I have write access on the wiki ? Who are administrators ? A while ago [2] we set up with Infra some security for our wiki: if you want write access you need to be enlisted as contributor in [3]; any PMC member can also be added to [4] thus becoming administrator. Please tell me your username and I will add it to [3] or [4], as you prefer. Regards. Le 05/03/2013 11:18, Cédric Damioli a écrit : Hi team, Ok, does this mean we can start rolling this long-waited 2.1.12??!? Cédric, are you ready? Let's go ! We are now in the process of releasing 2.1.12 in the next few days, so please don't check anything in in the 2.1.x branch. I'll try to follow [1] as much as possible. Best regards, Cédric [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonReleaseHowTo [2] http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-Spam-on-Cocoon-wiki---Fwd%3A--Cocoon-Wiki--Trivial-Update-of-%22FrontPage%22-by-wikimouse-p33732277.html [3] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/ContributorsGroup [4] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/AdminGroup -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [2.1.x] Code freeze and start of the release process (was Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12)
Hello, I just uploaded the release material at http://people.apache.org/~cdamioli/cocoon/ Before starting a formal vote, could some of you download and test the files (signatures, installation, samples, ...) ? I saw some broken samples, all related to some external sources (RSS feeds, SOAP servers, ...). I don't know if this may be considered blocker for the release. BTW, how could I have write access on the wiki ? Who are administrators ? Best regards, Cédric Le 05/03/2013 11:18, Cédric Damioli a écrit : Hi team, Ok, does this mean we can start rolling this long-waited 2.1.12??!? Cédric, are you ready? Let's go ! We are now in the process of releasing 2.1.12 in the next few days, so please don't check anything in in the 2.1.x branch. I'll try to follow [1] as much as possible. Best regards, Cédric [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonReleaseHowTo -- Cédric Damioli Ametys CMS http://www.ametys.org http://www.anyware-services.com
[2.1.x] Code freeze and start of the release process (was Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12)
Hi team, Ok, does this mean we can start rolling this long-waited 2.1.12??!? Cédric, are you ready? Let's go ! We are now in the process of releasing 2.1.12 in the next few days, so please don't check anything in in the 2.1.x branch. I'll try to follow [1] as much as possible. Best regards, Cédric [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonReleaseHowTo
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
On 05/03/2013 08:28, David Crossley wrote: Cédric Damioli wrote: Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : David Crossley wrote: I am busy for the next two weeks, being away for the second. Now half-way through testing Forrest using the recently updated Cocoon and its FOP/Batik/etc. Will try to finish that ASAP. ...guess it's wise to wait for you to finish such tests before starting the actual release process ;-) Indeed :) ;-) I only have time for some quick look and testing. Done that now, and my local Forrest seems happy. There are some svg-to-png errors from Batik, but other svg-to-png is okay, so assuming that that is a Forrest issue. Ok, does this mean we can start rolling this long-waited 2.1.12??!? Cédric, are you ready? Regards. I see that final touches were recently added to http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-125 I think our recent work is still compliant with that. WDYT ? Regards, Cédric -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Cédric Damioli wrote: > Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : > > David Crossley wrote: > > > >>I am busy for the next two weeks, being away for the second. > >>Now half-way through testing Forrest using the recently updated > >>Cocoon and its FOP/Batik/etc. Will try to finish that ASAP. > > > >...guess it's wise to wait for you to finish such tests before > >starting the actual release process ;-) > > Indeed :) ;-) I only have time for some quick look and testing. Done that now, and my local Forrest seems happy. There are some svg-to-png errors from Batik, but other svg-to-png is okay, so assuming that that is a Forrest issue. -David > >>I see that final touches were recently added to > >>http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html > >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-125 > > > I think our recent work is still compliant with that. WDYT ? > > Regards, > Cédric
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Le 04/03/2013 13:30, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 03/03/2013 06:30, David Crossley wrote: I am busy for the next two weeks, being away for the second. Now half-way through testing Forrest using the recently updated Cocoon and its FOP/Batik/etc. Will try to finish that ASAP. ...guess it's wise to wait for you to finish such tests before starting the actual release process ;-) Indeed :) Regards. I see that final touches were recently added to http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-125 I think our recent work is still compliant with that. WDYT ? Regards, Cédric
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
On 03/03/2013 06:30, David Crossley wrote: I am busy for the next two weeks, being away for the second. Now half-way through testing Forrest using the recently updated Cocoon and its FOP/Batik/etc. Will try to finish that ASAP. ...guess it's wise to wait for you to finish such tests before starting the actual release process ;-) Regards. I see that final touches were recently added to http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-125 -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
I am busy for the next two weeks, being away for the second. Now half-way through testing Forrest using the recently updated Cocoon and its FOP/Batik/etc. Will try to finish that ASAP. I see that final touches were recently added to http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-125 -David
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
On 28/02/2013 11:44, Cédric Damioli wrote: Le 28/02/2013 11:26, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 28/02/2013 11:22, Cédric Damioli wrote: Le 28/02/2013 10:04, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 27/02/2013 22:55, Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi all, It seems there remains only one open issue, COCOON-2333, related to dependencies upgrade. With r1451136 I have enabled the generation of .md5 and .sha1 for dist packages, required by [4]: please check it to confirm that it is working correctly. The .asc files will also need to be generated, but I haven't found an easy way to to this via ANT, hence I guess we have no option but the manual way, e.g. $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-src.zip.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-src.zip $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-src.tar.gz.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-src.tar.gz $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-deps.zip.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-deps.zip $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-deps.tar.gz.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-deps.tar.gz I urge to note that the release manager for 2.1.12 will also need to be sure that his own key is contained in [5]. BTW, who is actually the release manager for 2.1.12 ? Whoever wants to take this up: I was assuming you, actually ;-) Having some experience with releases (Maven-driven, actually...) I can help, if you want / need. I'm ok to do the job, if it's ok for others too ;) Well, the ASF is a do-ocracy [7] so don't be afraid :-) Having never done Apache releases, I'll certainly need help at some point, but IIRC the whole process was particularly well explained on the wiki. Guess you are referring to [8]. I think this will also be the chance to update it in some parts, so that releasing 2.1.13 would be easier. Regards. David, Francesco, others, are we ok with current dependencies? Some dependencies are obviously not on their latest versions, but IMHO, trying to upgrade all jars would be too long, and users may still upgrade one library if needed. What do you think? We have recently turned all the "To be done" statements from [6] into "Done", hence If no specific limitations and / or bugs are known affecting the current versions of dependencies, I see no reason for keep waiting. I've made a very quick tour on samples and all seemed to work nice. I'll look at them deeper once we have a release candidate. Fine. I'd create the release 2.1.13 on JIRA, move COCOON-2333 there and start the release process for 2.1.12. +1 It'll be part of the release process. Fine again. Regards. Le 22/01/2013 11:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 22/01/2013 07:26, David Crossley wrote: Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi there, AFAIK the same 3 issues are still opened. Could you give me a hint about the src/bin split? COCOON-2330 - Could you please tell me (again) how to generate the source and deps packages from SVN? Thanks. Do "./build.sh dist". There will also need to be different NOTICE and LICENSE files for each package. Adding this as comment to COCOON-2330 - let's move this discussion there. Apart, there's the David issue about upgrading all dependencies. I don't know the status of it. COCOON-2333 - According to [2], there are still few deps to check. I remember I've asked David about how to contribute on this an he said something like "update the JAR file an browse if samples still work" See a few messages above on this list. There is more to it than that, e.g. tweak lib/jars.xml file, do the build (which does have some code tests), review the relevant samples, etc. Also the issue is about "some" dependencies, not "all". For example FOP, Batik, etc. would be good if possible. Fine, I think I've found again such information at [3]; added this also as comment to COCOON-2333 - let's move this discussion there. And also an samples issue reopened by David. I don't know either what to do with it. COCOON-2069 - David, what should we do with this? See my issue comment. I made a workaround to fix the cause of the new misconfiguration which had broken the build for everyone. It seems that the original patch must have included some parts of some extra stuff (WSRP). I reckon forget it and just leave the workaround in-place. I've read your comment in COCOON-2069 and replied there recently: could you please take a look and reply? Thanks. Regards. Le 19/01/2013 15:11, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 11/12/2012 12:29, Cédric Damioli wrote: [...] Hi all, is everything tracked into JIRA [1]? >From my POV, yes. I've added some comments to COCOON-2330. I'm not sure what to include or exclude from the -src package. If so, we are only 3 issues away from releasing 2.1.12, wonderful! Hello there, how's the situation with C2.1.12 in 2013? Any help needed? Regards. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20COCOON%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.1.12-dev%20(Current%20SVN)%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reo
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Le 28/02/2013 11:26, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 28/02/2013 11:22, Cédric Damioli wrote: Le 28/02/2013 10:04, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 27/02/2013 22:55, Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi all, It seems there remains only one open issue, COCOON-2333, related to dependencies upgrade. With r1451136 I have enabled the generation of .md5 and .sha1 for dist packages, required by [4]: please check it to confirm that it is working correctly. The .asc files will also need to be generated, but I haven't found an easy way to to this via ANT, hence I guess we have no option but the manual way, e.g. $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-src.zip.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-src.zip $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-src.tar.gz.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-src.tar.gz $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-deps.zip.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-deps.zip $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-deps.tar.gz.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-deps.tar.gz I urge to note that the release manager for 2.1.12 will also need to be sure that his own key is contained in [5]. BTW, who is actually the release manager for 2.1.12 ? Whoever wants to take this up: I was assuming you, actually ;-) Having some experience with releases (Maven-driven, actually...) I can help, if you want / need. I'm ok to do the job, if it's ok for others too ;) Having never done Apache releases, I'll certainly need help at some point, but IIRC the whole process was particularly well explained on the wiki. David, Francesco, others, are we ok with current dependencies? Some dependencies are obviously not on their latest versions, but IMHO, trying to upgrade all jars would be too long, and users may still upgrade one library if needed. What do you think? We have recently turned all the "To be done" statements from [6] into "Done", hence If no specific limitations and / or bugs are known affecting the current versions of dependencies, I see no reason for keep waiting. I've made a very quick tour on samples and all seemed to work nice. I'll look at them deeper once we have a release candidate. Fine. I'd create the release 2.1.13 on JIRA, move COCOON-2333 there and start the release process for 2.1.12. +1 It'll be part of the release process. Fine again. Regards. Le 22/01/2013 11:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 22/01/2013 07:26, David Crossley wrote: Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi there, AFAIK the same 3 issues are still opened. Could you give me a hint about the src/bin split? COCOON-2330 - Could you please tell me (again) how to generate the source and deps packages from SVN? Thanks. Do "./build.sh dist". There will also need to be different NOTICE and LICENSE files for each package. Adding this as comment to COCOON-2330 - let's move this discussion there. Apart, there's the David issue about upgrading all dependencies. I don't know the status of it. COCOON-2333 - According to [2], there are still few deps to check. I remember I've asked David about how to contribute on this an he said something like "update the JAR file an browse if
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
On 28/02/2013 11:22, Cédric Damioli wrote: Le 28/02/2013 10:04, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 27/02/2013 22:55, Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi all, It seems there remains only one open issue, COCOON-2333, related to dependencies upgrade. With r1451136 I have enabled the generation of .md5 and .sha1 for dist packages, required by [4]: please check it to confirm that it is working correctly. The .asc files will also need to be generated, but I haven't found an easy way to to this via ANT, hence I guess we have no option but the manual way, e.g. $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-src.zip.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-src.zip $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-src.tar.gz.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-src.tar.gz $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-deps.zip.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-deps.zip $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-deps.tar.gz.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-deps.tar.gz I urge to note that the release manager for 2.1.12 will also need to be sure that his own key is contained in [5]. BTW, who is actually the release manager for 2.1.12 ? Whoever wants to take this up: I was assuming you, actually ;-) Having some experience with releases (Maven-driven, actually...) I can help, if you want / need. David, Francesco, others, are we ok with current dependencies? Some dependencies are obviously not on their latest versions, but IMHO, trying to upgrade all jars would be too long, and users may still upgrade one library if needed. What do you think? We have recently turned all the "To be done" statements from [6] into "Done", hence If no specific limitations and / or bugs are known affecting the current versions of dependencies, I see no reason for keep waiting. I've made a very quick tour on samples and all seemed to work nice. I'll look at them deeper once we have a release candidate. Fine. I'd create the release 2.1.13 on JIRA, move COCOON-2333 there and start the release process for 2.1.12. +1 It'll be part of the release process. Fine again. Regards. Le 22/01/2013 11:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 22/01/2013 07:26, David Crossley wrote: Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi there, AFAIK the same 3 issues are still opened. Could you give me a hint about the src/bin split? COCOON-2330 - Could you please tell me (again) how to generate the source and deps packages from SVN? Thanks. Do "./build.sh dist". There will also need to be different NOTICE and LICENSE files for each package. Adding this as comment to COCOON-2330 - let's move this discussion there. Apart, there's the David issue about upgrading all dependencies. I don't know the status of it. COCOON-2333 - According to [2], there are still few deps to check. I remember I've asked David about how to contribute on this an he said something like "update the JAR file an browse if samples still work" See a few messages above on this list. There is more to it than that, e.g. tweak lib/jars.xml file, do the build (which does have some code tests), review the relevant samples, etc. Also the issue is about "some" dependencies, not "all". For example FOP, Batik, etc. would be good if possible. Fine, I think I've found again such information at [3]; added this also as comment to COCOON-2333 - let's move this discussion there. And also an samples issue reopened by David. I don't know either what to do with it. COCOON-2069 - David, what should we do with this? See my issue comment. I made a workaround to fix the cause of the new misconfiguration which had broken the build for everyone. It seems that the original patch must have included some parts of some extra stuff (WSRP). I reckon forget it and just leave the workaround in-place. I've read your comment in COCOON-2069 and replied there recently: could you please take a look and reply? Thanks. Regards. Le 19/01/2013 15:11, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 11/12/2012 12:29, Cédric Damioli wrote: [...] Hi all, is everything tracked into JIRA [1]? >From my POV, yes. I've added some comments to COCOON-2330. I'm not sure what to include or exclude from the -src package. If so, we are only 3 issues away from releasing 2.1.12, wonderful! Hello there, how's the situation with C2.1.12 in 2013? Any help needed? Regards. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20COCOON%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.1.12-dev%20(Current%20SVN)%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC [2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/misc/notes/review-jars.txt [3] http://markmail.org/message/ijmy6nzd2k4yzghn#query:+page:1+mid:dbsylujycgit224q+state:results [4] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html [5] http://www.apache.org/dist/cocoon/KEYS [6] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/misc/notes/review-jars.txt -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member http://peo
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Le 28/02/2013 10:04, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 27/02/2013 22:55, Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi all, It seems there remains only one open issue, COCOON-2333, related to dependencies upgrade. With r1451136 I have enabled the generation of .md5 and .sha1 for dist packages, required by [4]: please check it to confirm that it is working correctly. The .asc files will also need to be generated, but I haven't found an easy way to to this via ANT, hence I guess we have no option but the manual way, e.g. $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-src.zip.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-src.zip $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-src.tar.gz.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-src.tar.gz $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-deps.zip.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-deps.zip $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-deps.tar.gz.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-deps.tar.gz I urge to note that the release manager for 2.1.12 will also need to be sure that his own key is contained in [5]. BTW, who is actually the release manager for 2.1.12 ? David, Francesco, others, are we ok with current dependencies? Some dependencies are obviously not on their latest versions, but IMHO, trying to upgrade all jars would be too long, and users may still upgrade one library if needed. What do you think? We have recently turned all the "To be done" statements from [6] into "Done", hence If no specific limitations and / or bugs are known affecting the current versions of dependencies, I see no reason for keep waiting. I've made a very quick tour on samples and all seemed to work nice. I'll look at them deeper once we have a release candidate. I'd create the release 2.1.13 on JIRA, move COCOON-2333 there and start the release process for 2.1.12. +1 It'll be part of the release process. Cédric Regards. Le 22/01/2013 11:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 22/01/2013 07:26, David Crossley wrote: Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi there, AFAIK the same 3 issues are still opened. Could you give me a hint about the src/bin split? COCOON-2330 - Could you please tell me (again) how to generate the source and deps packages from SVN? Thanks. Do "./build.sh dist". There will also need to be different NOTICE and LICENSE files for each package. Adding this as comment to COCOON-2330 - let's move this discussion there. Apart, there's the David issue about upgrading all dependencies. I don't know the status of it. COCOON-2333 - According to [2], there are still few deps to check. I remember I've asked David about how to contribute on this an he said something like "update the JAR file an browse if samples still work" See a few messages above on this list. There is more to it than that, e.g. tweak lib/jars.xml file, do the build (which does have some code tests), review the relevant samples, etc. Also the issue is about "some" dependencies, not "all". For example FOP, Batik, etc. would be good if possible. Fine, I think I've found again such information at [3]; added this also as comment to COCOON-2333 - let's move this discussion there. And also an samples issue reopened by David. I don't know either what to do with it. COCOON-2069 - David, what should we do with this? See my issue comment. I made a workaround to fix the cause of the new misconfiguration which had broken the build for everyone. It seems that the original patch must have included some parts of some extra stuff (WSRP). I reckon forget it and just leave the workaround in-place. I've read your comment in COCOON-2069 and replied there recently: could you please take a look and reply? Thanks. Regards. Le 19/01/2013 15:11, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 11/12/2012 12:29, Cédric Damioli wrote: [...] Hi all, is everything tracked into JIRA [1]? >From my POV, yes. I've added some comments to COCOON-2330. I'm not sure what to include or exclude from the -src package. If so, we are only 3 issues away from releasing 2.1.12, wonderful! Hello there, how's the situation with C2.1.12 in 2013? Any help needed? Regards. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20COCOON%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.1.12-dev%20(Current%20SVN)%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC [2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/misc/notes/review-jars.txt [3] http://markmail.org/message/ijmy6nzd2k4yzghn#query:+page:1+mid:dbsylujycgit224q+state:results [4] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html [5] http://www.apache.org/dist/cocoon/KEYS [6] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/misc/notes/review-jars.txt -- Cédric Damioli Ametys CMS http://www.ametys.org http://www.anyware-services.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
On 27/02/2013 22:55, Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi all, It seems there remains only one open issue, COCOON-2333, related to dependencies upgrade. With r1451136 I have enabled the generation of .md5 and .sha1 for dist packages, required by [4]: please check it to confirm that it is working correctly. The .asc files will also need to be generated, but I haven't found an easy way to to this via ANT, hence I guess we have no option but the manual way, e.g. $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-src.zip.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-src.zip $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-src.tar.gz.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-src.tar.gz $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-deps.zip.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-deps.zip $ gpg --armor --output cocoon-2.1.12-deps.tar.gz.asc --detach-sig cocoon-2.1.12-deps.tar.gz I urge to note that the release manager for 2.1.12 will also need to be sure that his own key is contained in [5]. David, Francesco, others, are we ok with current dependencies? Some dependencies are obviously not on their latest versions, but IMHO, trying to upgrade all jars would be too long, and users may still upgrade one library if needed. What do you think? We have recently turned all the "To be done" statements from [6] into "Done", hence If no specific limitations and / or bugs are known affecting the current versions of dependencies, I see no reason for keep waiting. I'd create the release 2.1.13 on JIRA, move COCOON-2333 there and start the release process for 2.1.12. Regards. Le 22/01/2013 11:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 22/01/2013 07:26, David Crossley wrote: Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi there, AFAIK the same 3 issues are still opened. Could you give me a hint about the src/bin split? COCOON-2330 - Could you please tell me (again) how to generate the source and deps packages from SVN? Thanks. Do "./build.sh dist". There will also need to be different NOTICE and LICENSE files for each package. Adding this as comment to COCOON-2330 - let's move this discussion there. Apart, there's the David issue about upgrading all dependencies. I don't know the status of it. COCOON-2333 - According to [2], there are still few deps to check. I remember I've asked David about how to contribute on this an he said something like "update the JAR file an browse if samples still work" See a few messages above on this list. There is more to it than that, e.g. tweak lib/jars.xml file, do the build (which does have some code tests), review the relevant samples, etc. Also the issue is about "some" dependencies, not "all". For example FOP, Batik, etc. would be good if possible. Fine, I think I've found again such information at [3]; added this also as comment to COCOON-2333 - let's move this discussion there. And also an samples issue reopened by David. I don't know either what to do with it. COCOON-2069 - David, what should we do with this? See my issue comment. I made a workaround to fix the cause of the new misconfiguration which had broken the build for everyone. It seems that the original patch must have included some parts of some extra stuff (WSRP). I reckon forget it and just leave the workaround in-place. I've read your comment in COCOON-2069 and replied there recently: could you please take a look and reply? Thanks. Regards. Le 19/01/2013 15:11, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 11/12/2012 12:29, Cédric Damioli wrote: [...] Hi all, is everything tracked into JIRA [1]? >From my POV, yes. I've added some comments to COCOON-2330. I'm not sure what to include or exclude from the -src package. If so, we are only 3 issues away from releasing 2.1.12, wonderful! Hello there, how's the situation with C2.1.12 in 2013? Any help needed? Regards. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20COCOON%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.1.12-dev%20(Current%20SVN)%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC [2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/misc/notes/review-jars.txt [3] http://markmail.org/message/ijmy6nzd2k4yzghn#query:+page:1+mid:dbsylujycgit224q+state:results [4] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html [5] http://www.apache.org/dist/cocoon/KEYS [6] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/misc/notes/review-jars.txt -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Hi all, It seems there remains only one open issue, COCOON-2333, related to dependencies upgrade. David, Francesco, others, are we ok with current dependencies ? Some dependencies are obviously not on their latest versions, but IMHO, trying to upgrade all jars would be too long, and users may still upgrade one library if needed. What do you think ? Best regards, Cédric Le 22/01/2013 11:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 22/01/2013 07:26, David Crossley wrote: Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi there, AFAIK the same 3 issues are still opened. Could you give me a hint about the src/bin split? COCOON-2330 - Could you please tell me (again) how to generate the source and deps packages from SVN? Thanks. Do "./build.sh dist". There will also need to be different NOTICE and LICENSE files for each package. Adding this as comment to COCOON-2330 - let's move this discussion there. Apart, there's the David issue about upgrading all dependencies. I don't know the status of it. COCOON-2333 - According to [2], there are still few deps to check. I remember I've asked David about how to contribute on this an he said something like "update the JAR file an browse if samples still work" See a few messages above on this list. There is more to it than that, e.g. tweak lib/jars.xml file, do the build (which does have some code tests), review the relevant samples, etc. Also the issue is about "some" dependencies, not "all". For example FOP, Batik, etc. would be good if possible. Fine, I think I've found again such information at [3]; added this also as comment to COCOON-2333 - let's move this discussion there. And also an samples issue reopened by David. I don't know either what to do with it. COCOON-2069 - David, what should we do with this? See my issue comment. I made a workaround to fix the cause of the new misconfiguration which had broken the build for everyone. It seems that the original patch must have included some parts of some extra stuff (WSRP). I reckon forget it and just leave the workaround in-place. I've read your comment in COCOON-2069 and replied there recently: could you please take a look and reply? Thanks. Regards. Le 19/01/2013 15:11, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 11/12/2012 12:29, Cédric Damioli wrote: [...] Hi all, is everything tracked into JIRA [1]? >From my POV, yes. I've added some comments to COCOON-2330. I'm not sure what to include or exclude from the -src package. If so, we are only 3 issues away from releasing 2.1.12, wonderful! Hello there, how's the situation with C2.1.12 in 2013? Any help needed? Regards. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20COCOON%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.1.12-dev%20(Current%20SVN)%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC [2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/misc/notes/review-jars.txt [3] http://markmail.org/message/ijmy6nzd2k4yzghn#query:+page:1+mid:dbsylujycgit224q+state:results
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
On 22/01/2013 07:26, David Crossley wrote: Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi there, AFAIK the same 3 issues are still opened. Could you give me a hint about the src/bin split? COCOON-2330 - Could you please tell me (again) how to generate the source and deps packages from SVN? Thanks. Do "./build.sh dist". There will also need to be different NOTICE and LICENSE files for each package. Adding this as comment to COCOON-2330 - let's move this discussion there. Apart, there's the David issue about upgrading all dependencies. I don't know the status of it. COCOON-2333 - According to [2], there are still few deps to check. I remember I've asked David about how to contribute on this an he said something like "update the JAR file an browse if samples still work" See a few messages above on this list. There is more to it than that, e.g. tweak lib/jars.xml file, do the build (which does have some code tests), review the relevant samples, etc. Also the issue is about "some" dependencies, not "all". For example FOP, Batik, etc. would be good if possible. Fine, I think I've found again such information at [3]; added this also as comment to COCOON-2333 - let's move this discussion there. And also an samples issue reopened by David. I don't know either what to do with it. COCOON-2069 - David, what should we do with this? See my issue comment. I made a workaround to fix the cause of the new misconfiguration which had broken the build for everyone. It seems that the original patch must have included some parts of some extra stuff (WSRP). I reckon forget it and just leave the workaround in-place. I've read your comment in COCOON-2069 and replied there recently: could you please take a look and reply? Thanks. Regards. Le 19/01/2013 15:11, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 11/12/2012 12:29, Cédric Damioli wrote: [...] Hi all, is everything tracked into JIRA [1]? >From my POV, yes. I've added some comments to COCOON-2330. I'm not sure what to include or exclude from the -src package. If so, we are only 3 issues away from releasing 2.1.12, wonderful! Hello there, how's the situation with C2.1.12 in 2013? Any help needed? Regards. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20COCOON%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.1.12-dev%20(Current%20SVN)%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC [2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/misc/notes/review-jars.txt [3] http://markmail.org/message/ijmy6nzd2k4yzghn#query:+page:1+mid:dbsylujycgit224q+state:results -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > Cédric Damioli wrote: > >Hi there, > > > >AFAIK the same 3 issues are still opened. Could you give me a hint > >about the src/bin split? > > COCOON-2330 - Could you please tell me (again) how to generate the > source and deps packages from SVN? Thanks. Do "./build.sh dist". There will also need to be different NOTICE and LICENSE files for each package. > >Apart, there's the David issue about upgrading all dependencies. I > >don't know the status of it. > > COCOON-2333 - According to [2], there are still few deps to check. I > remember I've asked David about how to contribute on this an he said > something like "update the JAR file an browse if samples still work" See a few messages above on this list. There is more to it than that, e.g. tweak lib/jars.xml file, do the build (which does have some code tests), review the relevant samples, etc. Also the issue is about "some" dependencies, not "all". For example FOP, Batik, etc. would be good if possible. > >And also an samples issue reopened by David. I don't know either what > >to do with it. > > COCOON-2069 - David, what should we do with this? See my issue comment. I made a workaround to fix the cause of the new misconfiguration which had broken the build for everyone. It seems that the original patch must have included some parts of some extra stuff (WSRP). I reckon forget it and just leave the workaround in-place. -David > Regards. > > >Le 19/01/2013 15:11, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : > >>On 11/12/2012 12:29, Cédric Damioli wrote: > >>>[...] > Hi all, > is everything tracked into JIRA [1]? > >>>From my POV, yes. > >>>I've added some comments to COCOON-2330. I'm not sure what to > >>>include or exclude from the -src package. > >>> > > If so, we are only 3 issues away from releasing 2.1.12, wonderful! > >> > >>Hello there, > >>how's the situation with C2.1.12 in 2013? Any help needed? > >> > >>Regards. > >> > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20COCOON%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.1.12-dev%20(Current%20SVN)%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > [2] > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/misc/notes/review-jars.txt > > > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member > http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ >
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
On 19/01/2013 17:19, Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi there, AFAIK the same 3 issues are still opened. Could you give me a hint about the src/bin split? COCOON-2330 - Could you please tell me (again) how to generate the source and deps packages from SVN? Thanks. Apart, there's the David issue about upgrading all dependencies. I don't know the status of it. COCOON-2333 - According to [2], there are still few deps to check. I remember I've asked David about how to contribute on this an he said something like "update the JAR file an browse if samples still work" And also an samples issue reopened by David. I don't know either what to do with it. COCOON-2069 - David, what should we do with this? Regards. Le 19/01/2013 15:11, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 11/12/2012 12:29, Cédric Damioli wrote: [...] Hi all, is everything tracked into JIRA [1]? From my POV, yes. I've added some comments to COCOON-2330. I'm not sure what to include or exclude from the -src package. If so, we are only 3 issues away from releasing 2.1.12, wonderful! Hello there, how's the situation with C2.1.12 in 2013? Any help needed? Regards. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20COCOON%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.1.12-dev%20(Current%20SVN)%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC [2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/misc/notes/review-jars.txt -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Hi there, AFAIK the same 3 issues are still opened. Could you give me a hint about the src/bin split? Apart, there's the David issue about upgrading all dependencies. I don't know the status of it. And also an samples issue reopened by David. I don't know either what to do with it. Regards, Cédric Le 19/01/2013 15:11, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 11/12/2012 12:29, Cédric Damioli wrote: [...] Hi all, is everything tracked into JIRA [1]? From my POV, yes. I've added some comments to COCOON-2330. I'm not sure what to include or exclude from the -src package. If so, we are only 3 issues away from releasing 2.1.12, wonderful! Hello there, how's the situation with C2.1.12 in 2013? Any help needed? Regards. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20COCOON%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.1.12-dev%20(Current%20SVN)%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC -- Cédric Damioli Ametys CMS http://www.ametys.org http://www.anyware-services.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
On 11/12/2012 12:29, Cédric Damioli wrote: [...] Hi all, is everything tracked into JIRA [1]? From my POV, yes. I've added some comments to COCOON-2330. I'm not sure what to include or exclude from the -src package. If so, we are only 3 issues away from releasing 2.1.12, wonderful! Hello there, how's the situation with C2.1.12 in 2013? Any help needed? Regards. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20COCOON%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.1.12-dev%20(Current%20SVN)%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Hi, Le 11/12/2012 11:46, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 07/12/2012 08:44, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: On 07/12/2012 08:14, David Crossley wrote: I spent some time to attempt to upgrade the guts of Forrest to utilise today's Cocoon-2.1.12-dev version. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1240 Hooray, it works. That's very good news! As explained there it would also be good to upgrade some of the supporting products dependencies in Cocoon. Forrest has some that are newer than Cocoon and vice versa. We probably each have some that are out-of-date. It makes sense: would you like to open an issue for this? To summarize, what's missing now to release 2.1.12? Hi all, is everything tracked into JIRA [1]? From my POV, yes. I've added some comments to COCOON-2330. I'm not sure what to include or exclude from the -src package. If so, we are only 3 issues away from releasing 2.1.12, wonderful! Regards. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20COCOON%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.1.12-dev%20(Current%20SVN)%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC Regards, -- Cédric Damioli Ametys CMS http://www.ametys.org http://www.anyware-services.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
On 07/12/2012 08:44, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: On 07/12/2012 08:14, David Crossley wrote: I spent some time to attempt to upgrade the guts of Forrest to utilise today's Cocoon-2.1.12-dev version. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1240 Hooray, it works. That's very good news! As explained there it would also be good to upgrade some of the supporting products dependencies in Cocoon. Forrest has some that are newer than Cocoon and vice versa. We probably each have some that are out-of-date. It makes sense: would you like to open an issue for this? To summarize, what's missing now to release 2.1.12? Hi all, is everything tracked into JIRA [1]? If so, we are only 3 issues away from releasing 2.1.12, wonderful! Regards. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20COCOON%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.1.12-dev%20(Current%20SVN)%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > > >As explained there it would also be good to upgrade some of the > >supporting products dependencies in Cocoon. Forrest has some that > >are newer than Cocoon and vice versa. We probably each have some > >that are out-of-date. > > It makes sense: would you like to open an issue for this? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2333 C-2.1: upgrade some supporting product dependencies That links to a list in SVN at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/misc/notes/review-jars.txt Would developers and users please add notes for any jars that would be necessary or worthwhile to upgrade. -David
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
On 07/12/2012 08:14, David Crossley wrote: I spent some time to attempt to upgrade the guts of Forrest to utilise today's Cocoon-2.1.12-dev version. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1240 Hooray, it works. That's very good news! As explained there it would also be good to upgrade some of the supporting products dependencies in Cocoon. Forrest has some that are newer than Cocoon and vice versa. We probably each have some that are out-of-date. It makes sense: would you like to open an issue for this? To summarize, what's missing now to release 2.1.12? Thanks. Regards. -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
I spent some time to attempt to upgrade the guts of Forrest to utilise today's Cocoon-2.1.12-dev version. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1240 Hooray, it works. As explained there it would also be good to upgrade some of the supporting products dependencies in Cocoon. Forrest has some that are newer than Cocoon and vice versa. We probably each have some that are out-of-date. -David
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Hi, I've slightly modified the build files in order to separate libs from sources. I've uploaded http://people.apache.org/~cdamioli/cocoon-2.1.12-rc-src.zip and http://people.apache.org/~cdamioli/cocoon-2.1.12-rc-deps.zip to get your comments. Does these archives correspond to Apache policy ? Thanks for your feedbacks, Regards, Cédric Le 27/11/2012 12:52, Cédric Damioli a écrit : Le 27/11/2012 08:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 27/11/2012 08:18, David Crossley wrote: In the past releases of Cocoon-2.1, we included the relevant versions of all supporting product dependencies. That is okay as a convenience. However we need to provide a source code package which does not contain those external JAR files, and conduct our release vote against that package. Then we can construct other convenience packages for distribution. Forrest got into the same situation. Here is some background and links to other discussion: http://s.apache.org/mCW We solved the immediate situation but still need to adjust our build system. The Cocoon-2.1 Apache Ant build system should be reasonably easy to tweak to create separate packages. Hi David, I've been involved in similar discussions a while ago and I completely agree with you. I've opened OCOON-2330 for tracking this: who is available to help? I do I'll try to modify ant tasks to separate ZIP files What we have to do is to know exactly which files are Cocoon sources and which are not Best regards, -- Cédric Damioli Ametys CMS http://www.ametys.org http://www.anyware-services.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Le 27/11/2012 08:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 27/11/2012 08:18, David Crossley wrote: In the past releases of Cocoon-2.1, we included the relevant versions of all supporting product dependencies. That is okay as a convenience. However we need to provide a source code package which does not contain those external JAR files, and conduct our release vote against that package. Then we can construct other convenience packages for distribution. Forrest got into the same situation. Here is some background and links to other discussion: http://s.apache.org/mCW We solved the immediate situation but still need to adjust our build system. The Cocoon-2.1 Apache Ant build system should be reasonably easy to tweak to create separate packages. Hi David, I've been involved in similar discussions a while ago and I completely agree with you. I've opened OCOON-2330 for tracking this: who is available to help? I do I'll try to modify ant tasks to separate ZIP files What we have to do is to know exactly which files are Cocoon sources and which are not Best regards, -- Cédric Damioli Ametys CMS http://www.ametys.org http://www.anyware-services.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
On 27/11/2012 08:18, David Crossley wrote: In the past releases of Cocoon-2.1, we included the relevant versions of all supporting product dependencies. That is okay as a convenience. However we need to provide a source code package which does not contain those external JAR files, and conduct our release vote against that package. Then we can construct other convenience packages for distribution. Forrest got into the same situation. Here is some background and links to other discussion: http://s.apache.org/mCW We solved the immediate situation but still need to adjust our build system. The Cocoon-2.1 Apache Ant build system should be reasonably easy to tweak to create separate packages. Hi David, I've been involved in similar discussions a while ago and I completely agree with you. I've opened OCOON-2330 for tracking this: who is available to help? Regards. -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
In the past releases of Cocoon-2.1, we included the relevant versions of all supporting product dependencies. That is okay as a convenience. However we need to provide a source code package which does not contain those external JAR files, and conduct our release vote against that package. Then we can construct other convenience packages for distribution. Forrest got into the same situation. Here is some background and links to other discussion: http://s.apache.org/mCW We solved the immediate situation but still need to adjust our build system. The Cocoon-2.1 Apache Ant build system should be reasonably easy to tweak to create separate packages. -David
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Le 22/11/2012 13:55, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 22/11/2012 11:57, Sylvain Wallez wrote: Le 21/11/12 23:43, David Crossley a écrit : I am still around from the olden days and will try to help. However my time is very limited. Same for here! I would be happy to help where I can, but have limited time. That sounds great: with two "old foxes" like you things can only raise better :-) I think Cédric would need some help especially with pre-release checks and issues related to blocks he has never dealt with; Cédric, is this correct? You're right, especially for the "Forms" or "Authentication" blocks. I know Sylvain wrote a big part of the forms block (we were colleagues at that time), but it was a long time ago :) Regards. Regards, -- Cédric Damioli Ametys CMS http://www.ametys.org http://www.anyware-services.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
On 22/11/2012 11:57, Sylvain Wallez wrote: Le 21/11/12 23:43, David Crossley a écrit : I am still around from the olden days and will try to help. However my time is very limited. Same for here! I would be happy to help where I can, but have limited time. That sounds great: with two "old foxes" like you things can only raise better :-) I think Cédric would need some help especially with pre-release checks and issues related to blocks he has never dealt with; Cédric, is this correct? Regards. -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Le 21/11/12 23:43, David Crossley a écrit : I am still around from the olden days and will try to help. However my time is very limited. Same for here! I would be happy to help where I can, but have limited time. Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Cédric Damioli wrote: > Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit: > >Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > >>[...] > >> > 2. Is the release process clear to you? If not, who (maybe active > in the past) can provide some hint? > >>> > >>>Not really. > >>>I think there was once a page written by Carsten describing the > >>>release process, but I can't find it anymore. > >> > >>I guess we should directly ask Carlsten, then: let's see if he > >>replies here, otherwise we can try to contact him somehow else. > > > >What about http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonReleaseHowTo ? > > It seems to be what I was looking for. > I was searching in the site and didn't remember there was a wiki ! I am still around from the olden days and will try to help. However my time is very limited. People on the user list should be invited to sign up to the "dev" list and assist, even if it is just to test samples and tweak docs. -David
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Le 19/11/2012 12:00, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : On 19/11/2012 11:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: [...] 2. Is the release process clear to you? If not, who (maybe active in the past) can provide some hint? Not really. I think there was once a page written by Carsten describing the release process, but I can't find it anymore. I guess we should directly ask Carlsten, then: let's see if he replies here, otherwise we can try to contact him somehow else. What about http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonReleaseHowTo ? It seems to be what I was looking for. I was searching in the site and didn't remember there was a wiki ! -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Cocoon PMC and Apache Syncope PPMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ -- Cédric Damioli Ametys CMS http://www.ametys.org http://www.anyware-services.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Hi, Le 18/11/2012 18:35, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : Hi all (but Cédric in particular), by looking at JIRA [1] it seems that quite a considerable number of issues have been fixed since 2.1.11 (31) even though some are still standing (11+2). Following our recent discussion in another thread, I have some questions to Cédric (and other C2.1 devs, if there are...): 1. Do you think that the the 13 outstanding issues can be moved to 2.1.13 or there are some that need to be absolutely included in 2.1.12? 3 of them were opened by myself before gaining committership. [1] [2] [3] I could have closed them already, but was waiting for others' approval. I don't know if someone has something to say about them ... The 10 others issues are more than 2 years old There are also 74 issues with no "fix for" version (29 with a patch included) but affecting a 2.1.x version We should maybe ask 2.1 users if there are particular issues they want to be fixed before cutting a 2.1.12 ? 2. Is the release process clear to you? If not, who (maybe active in the past) can provide some hint? Not really. I think there was once a page written by Carsten describing the release process, but I can't find it anymore. 3. Do you need any help in the release process? If so, who is available to help? I am, even though I don't remember pretty anything of C2.1... Yes please :) It would be great if 2 or 3 people other than me could try to run unit tests and run samples. Almost 5 years after the 2.1.11, I also don't remember all blocks, it would be great to also have feedbacks from users of some specific blocks. 4. Considering the questions above, when do you think we can start releasing 2.1.12? Depending if we try to gather some feedbacks from devs and users or not, it could be quite fast, say in the next few days. But 5 years after, we can afford one or two more weeks if needed :) Thanks for info. Regards. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON/fixforversion/12312903#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2288 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2313 [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2314 Best regards, -- Cédric Damioli Ametys CMS http://www.ametys.org http://www.anyware-services.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
On 19/11/2012 11:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > [...] > >>> 2. Is the release process clear to you? If not, who (maybe active >>> in the past) can provide some hint? >> Not really. >> I think there was once a page written by Carsten describing the >> release process, but I can't find it anymore. > > I guess we should directly ask Carlsten, then: let's see if he replies > here, otherwise we can try to contact him somehow else. What about http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonReleaseHowTo ? -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Cocoon PMC and Apache Syncope PPMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
On 19/11/2012 10:45, Cédric Damioli wrote: > Hi, > > Le 18/11/2012 18:35, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : >> Hi all (but Cédric in particular), >> by looking at JIRA [1] it seems that quite a considerable number of >> issues have been fixed since 2.1.11 (31) even though some are still >> standing (11+2). >> >> Following our recent discussion in another thread, I have some >> questions to Cédric (and other C2.1 devs, if there are...): >> >> 1. Do you think that the the 13 outstanding issues can be moved to >> 2.1.13 or there are some that need to be absolutely included in 2.1.12? > 3 of them were opened by myself before gaining committership. [1] [2] [3] > I could have closed them already, but was waiting for others' > approval. I don't know if someone has something to say about them ... I think you can safely apply the "lazy consensus" [1] here, especially since it seems there is no one else - but you - taking care of C2.1 issues :-( > The 10 others issues are more than 2 years old > > There are also 74 issues with no "fix for" version (29 with a patch > included) but affecting a 2.1.x version > > We should maybe ask 2.1 users if there are particular issues they want > to be fixed before cutting a 2.1.12 ? I think you should send an e-mail to users@ ML asking to review the 74 issues reported above (a direct link to the JIRA search would be helpful) and to explicitly set the fix-for-version to 2.1.12 if they absolutely require so. Once 72 hours have passed by, you can look at the results and see what to do; for any other non-answered issue, I think you can apply again [4]. >> 2. Is the release process clear to you? If not, who (maybe active >> in the past) can provide some hint? > Not really. > I think there was once a page written by Carsten describing the > release process, but I can't find it anymore. I guess we should directly ask Carlsten, then: let's see if he replies here, otherwise we can try to contact him somehow else. >> 3. Do you need any help in the release process? If so, who is >> available to help? I am, even though I don't remember pretty anything >> of C2.1... > Yes please > It would be great if 2 or 3 people other than me could try to run unit > tests and run samples. > Almost 5 years after the 2.1.11, I also don't remember all blocks, it > would be great to also have feedbacks from users of some specific blocks. Just show what steps are needed to make such verifications; about the "completeness" of such verifications, I think that only dalily usage can do better, hence don't worry too much. >> 4. Considering the questions above, when do you think we can start >> releasing 2.1.12? > Depending if we try to gather some feedbacks from devs and users or > not, it could be quite fast, say in the next few days. > But 5 years after, we can afford one or two more weeks if needed My opinion here is to try to be as safe as possible, but also to try to release ASAP - at most before the end of the year: we cannot afford additional delay: let's apply [4] as much as possible and leave any missing piece from 2.1.13: I hope it won't take 4 more years :-) Regards. >> [1] >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON/fixforversion/12312903#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel >> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2288 > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2313 > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2314 [4] http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Cocoon PMC and Apache Syncope PPMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Hi, Le 18/11/2012 18:35, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : Hi all (but Cédric in particular), by looking at JIRA [1] it seems that quite a considerable number of issues have been fixed since 2.1.11 (31) even though some are still standing (11+2). Following our recent discussion in another thread, I have some questions to Cédric (and other C2.1 devs, if there are...): 1. Do you think that the the 13 outstanding issues can be moved to 2.1.13 or there are some that need to be absolutely included in 2.1.12? 3 of them were opened by myself before gaining committership. [1] [2] [3] I could have closed them already, but was waiting for others' approval. I don't know if someone has something to say about them ... The 10 others issues are more than 2 years old There are also 74 issues with no "fix for" version (29 with a patch included) but affecting a 2.1.x version We should maybe ask 2.1 users if there are particular issues they want to be fixed before cutting a 2.1.12 ? 2. Is the release process clear to you? If not, who (maybe active in the past) can provide some hint? Not really. I think there was once a page written by Carsten describing the release process, but I can't find it anymore. 3. Do you need any help in the release process? If so, who is available to help? I am, even though I don't remember pretty anything of C2.1... Yes please It would be great if 2 or 3 people other than me could try to run unit tests and run samples. Almost 5 years after the 2.1.11, I also don't remember all blocks, it would be great to also have feedbacks from users of some specific blocks. 4. Considering the questions above, when do you think we can start releasing 2.1.12? Depending if we try to gather some feedbacks from devs and users or not, it could be quite fast, say in the next few days. But 5 years after, we can afford one or two more weeks if needed Thanks for info. Regards. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON/fixforversion/12312903#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2288 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2313 [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2314 Best regards, -- Cédric Damioli Ametys CMS http://www.ametys.org http://www.anyware-services.com
[DISCUSS] Releasing 2.1.12
Hi all (but Cédric in particular), by looking at JIRA [1] it seems that quite a considerable number of issues have been fixed since 2.1.11 (31) even though some are still standing (11+2). Following our recent discussion in another thread, I have some questions to Cédric (and other C2.1 devs, if there are...): 1. Do you think that the the 13 outstanding issues can be moved to 2.1.13 or there are some that need to be absolutely included in 2.1.12? 2. Is the release process clear to you? If not, who (maybe active in the past) can provide some hint? 3. Do you need any help in the release process? If so, who is available to help? I am, even though I don't remember pretty anything of C2.1... 4. Considering the questions above, when do you think we can start releasing 2.1.12? Thanks for info. Regards. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON/fixforversion/12312903#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Cocoon PMC and Apache Syncope PPMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/