RE: Some "Hosts Unreachable" - Follow-up

[Ben Schorr]

You believe correctly. :)  Not sure we'll figure out whose router it was,
but as long as it doesn't happen again I don't much care.

-Ben-

> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:59 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Some "Hosts Unreachable" - Follow-up
> 
> 
> The term, I believe, is black-hole router.
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ben Schorr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:54 PM
> Subject: RE: Some "Hosts Unreachable" - Follow-up
> 
> 
> > Well, the problem is resolved but nobody's entirely sure how.  It 
> > looks
> like
> > it was an issue with a router somewhere upstream discarding 
> improperly
> sized
> > packets instead of responding properly (Q136970 is sort of related) 
> > but whose router and what they did to fix it we don't know 
> for certain 
> > just
> yet.
> >
> > What a day.
> >
> > -Ben-
> > Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
> > Director of Information Services
> > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
> > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:00 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: Some "Hosts Unreachable"
> > >
> > >
> > > This is a new one on me; maybe some of you have seen it before.  
> > > Exchange 5.5 on NT4SP6a using the IMS to connect through an ISA 
> > > server.  On a handful of hosts the message queues up with a "Host 
> > > Unreachable" error.  On most hosts (including old favorites like 
> > > aol.com, hotmail.com, etc.) mail comes and goes just fine and we 
> > > don't seem to be having any problems RECEIVING mail.
> > >
> > > But to this small band of hosts (including hawaii.edu and
> > > hawaii.rr.com) the mail just queues up.  Here's a snippet from an 
> > > SMTP log that may shed some
> > > light:
> > >
> > > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : >>> MAIL
> > > FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=1977 RET=FULL
> > > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< IO: |250 2.1.0 
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
> > > |
> > > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< 250 2.1.0 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > OK 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : >>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > NOTIFY=FAILURE,DELAY
> > >
> > > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< IO: |250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > |
> > > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< 250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : >>> DATA
> > >
> > > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< IO: |354 Start mail input;
> > > end with .
> > > |
> > > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< 354 Start mail input; end
> > > with .
> > > 3/19/02 12:16:22 PM : 499 Host unreachable: cta.net.  Message
> > > subject: ""Plain Text Test"".  Rescheduling delivery for later.
> > >
> > > Notice that it seems to be going fine until it gets the 
> 354 message, 
> > > then it sits for a little over a minute and seems to time 
> out.  This 
> > > particular test message was just a couple of lines of 
> plain text; so 
> > > it shouldn't be a size issue.
> > >
> > > We've already restarted the IMS several times and the entire 
> > > Exchange server once.  Judging by the oldest message in the queue 
> > > this problem seems to have started this weekend and no unusual 
> > > system maintenance or changes occurred over the weekend.  
> As far as 
> > > I know we were able to send mail to/from those domains 
> just fine on 
> > > Friday.
> > >
> > > Baffling.  Any thoughts on what might be causing this and 
> how we can 
> > > resolve it?
> > >
> > > -Ben-
> > > Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
> > > Director of Information Services
> > > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
> > > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com 
> > >
> > >
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Some "Hosts Unreachable" - Follow-up

[Daniel Chenault]

The term, I believe, is black-hole router.

- Original Message -
From: "Ben Schorr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:54 PM
Subject: RE: Some "Hosts Unreachable" - Follow-up


> Well, the problem is resolved but nobody's entirely sure how.  It looks
like
> it was an issue with a router somewhere upstream discarding improperly
sized
> packets instead of responding properly (Q136970 is sort of related) but
> whose router and what they did to fix it we don't know for certain just
yet.
>
> What a day.
>
> -Ben-
> Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
> Director of Information Services
> Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
> http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:00 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Some "Hosts Unreachable"
> >
> >
> > This is a new one on me; maybe some of you have seen it
> > before.  Exchange 5.5 on NT4SP6a using the IMS to connect
> > through an ISA server.  On a handful of hosts the message
> > queues up with a "Host Unreachable" error.  On most hosts
> > (including old favorites like aol.com, hotmail.com, etc.)
> > mail comes and goes just fine and we don't seem to be having
> > any problems RECEIVING mail.
> >
> > But to this small band of hosts (including hawaii.edu and
> > hawaii.rr.com) the mail just queues up.  Here's a snippet
> > from an SMTP log that may shed some
> > light:
> >
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : >>> MAIL
> > FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=1977 RET=FULL
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< IO: |250 2.1.0
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
> > |
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< 250 2.1.0
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : >>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > NOTIFY=FAILURE,DELAY
> >
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< IO: |250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > |
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< 250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : >>> DATA
> >
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< IO: |354 Start mail input;
> > end with .
> > |
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< 354 Start mail input; end
> > with .
> > 3/19/02 12:16:22 PM : 499 Host unreachable: cta.net.  Message
> > subject: ""Plain Text Test"".  Rescheduling delivery for later.
> >
> > Notice that it seems to be going fine until it gets the 354
> > message, then it sits for a little over a minute and seems to
> > time out.  This particular test message was just a couple of
> > lines of plain text; so it shouldn't be a size issue.
> >
> > We've already restarted the IMS several times and the entire
> > Exchange server once.  Judging by the oldest message in the
> > queue this problem seems to have started this weekend and no
> > unusual system maintenance or changes occurred over the
> > weekend.  As far as I know we were able to send mail to/from
> > those domains just fine on Friday.
> >
> > Baffling.  Any thoughts on what might be causing this and how
> > we can resolve it?
> >
> > -Ben-
> > Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
> > Director of Information Services
> > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
> > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com 
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Restricting downloads from Public Folders

[Martin Blackstone]

How about right click on the attachment, Open in new Window?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 8:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Restricting downloads from Public Folders


Exch 5.5 SP4
NT 4.0 SP6a
OWA (SSL)

Scenario: 
We are a consulting shop with many mobile users. Many of the users
are based at client sites and are currently using OWA for email access. We
want to be able to publish company information (some of which may be
confidential) to public folders. It is necessary for our users have access
to this information from where ever they may be. The majority of the
information is in "Office" format (.doc, .xls, .ppt)

Question(s):

Is it possible to change the way OWA (IE) handles these document formats
(server side)? Currently users would have to download these documents to the
local machine before viewing them. We really don't want this info scattered
about our clients networks. 
What is the most appropriate way to handle this scenario?

Ideas!

Matt

NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission and any attachment(s) may contain
confidential information and are intended only for the person(s) named.  Any
use, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender via
e-mail and delete this message.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Restricting downloads from Public Folders

[MChase]

Exch 5.5 SP4
NT 4.0 SP6a
OWA (SSL)

Scenario: 
We are a consulting shop with many mobile users. Many of the users
are based at client sites and are currently using OWA for email access. We
want to be able to publish company information (some of which may be
confidential) to public folders. It is necessary for our users have access
to this information from where ever they may be. The majority of the
information is in "Office" format (.doc, .xls, .ppt)

Question(s):

Is it possible to change the way OWA (IE) handles these document formats
(server side)? Currently users would have to download these documents to the
local machine before viewing them. We really don't want this info scattered
about our clients networks. 
What is the most appropriate way to handle this scenario?

Ideas!

Matt

NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission and any attachment(s) may contain
confidential information and are intended only for the person(s) named.  Any
use, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender via
e-mail and delete this message.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Some "Hosts Unreachable" - Follow-up

[Ben Schorr]

Well, the problem is resolved but nobody's entirely sure how.  It looks like
it was an issue with a router somewhere upstream discarding improperly sized
packets instead of responding properly (Q136970 is sort of related) but
whose router and what they did to fix it we don't know for certain just yet.

What a day.

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com


> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:00 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Some "Hosts Unreachable"
> 
> 
> This is a new one on me; maybe some of you have seen it 
> before.  Exchange 5.5 on NT4SP6a using the IMS to connect 
> through an ISA server.  On a handful of hosts the message 
> queues up with a "Host Unreachable" error.  On most hosts 
> (including old favorites like aol.com, hotmail.com, etc.) 
> mail comes and goes just fine and we don't seem to be having 
> any problems RECEIVING mail.
> 
> But to this small band of hosts (including hawaii.edu and 
> hawaii.rr.com) the mail just queues up.  Here's a snippet 
> from an SMTP log that may shed some
> light:
> 
>   3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : >>> MAIL 
> FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=1977 RET=FULL
>   3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< IO: |250 2.1.0 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
>   |
>   3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< 250 2.1.0 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
>   3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : >>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> NOTIFY=FAILURE,DELAY
> 
>   3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< IO: |250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>   |
>   3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< 250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>   3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : >>> DATA
> 
>   3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< IO: |354 Start mail input; 
> end with .
>   |
>   3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< 354 Start mail input; end 
> with .
>   3/19/02 12:16:22 PM : 499 Host unreachable: cta.net.  Message
> subject: ""Plain Text Test"".  Rescheduling delivery for later.
> 
> Notice that it seems to be going fine until it gets the 354 
> message, then it sits for a little over a minute and seems to 
> time out.  This particular test message was just a couple of 
> lines of plain text; so it shouldn't be a size issue.
> 
> We've already restarted the IMS several times and the entire 
> Exchange server once.  Judging by the oldest message in the 
> queue this problem seems to have started this weekend and no 
> unusual system maintenance or changes occurred over the 
> weekend.  As far as I know we were able to send mail to/from 
> those domains just fine on Friday.
> 
> Baffling.  Any thoughts on what might be causing this and how 
> we can resolve it?
> 
> -Ben-
> Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
> Director of Information Services
> Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
> http://www.hawaiilawyer.com  
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: POP3 Connector Needed

[Daniel Chenault]

Bad, bad bidness. Guaranteed data loss. Do it right with SMTP and be done
with it.

- Original Message -
From: "kedar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:55 AM
Subject: POP3 Connector Needed


> Hi All,
>
> I know there is a pop3 connector available with Small Business Servers.
> But i want to use with Windows 2000 Standradedition combination with
> exchange 2000 standard edition...can anyone tell me if you have any
> solution other than going for third party connectors
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: unable to upgrade to exch 2000

[Webb, Andy]

You need to clean out all remnants of the E2K install and start from
scratch.  There are KB articles on what part of the AD you need to clean up
(Microsoft Exchange substructure of the Configuration container).  I'd make
sure to read up first though - your AD is nothing to experiment on. :)

===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED]  www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc.   Austin, TX512-322-0071
=== 

-Original Message-
From: Steve Van Eck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: unable to upgrade to exch 2000


Several months back, it appears that a developer (GRRR) installed Exchange
2000 on a machine in the domain. Now that I am trying to upgrade our
Exchange 5.5 site, I am having several problems. When I try to create an
intra-organizational ADC I receive this error

"Unable to create an intra-organizational Connection Agreement using the
specified Exchange 5.5 Server. The Exchange 5.5 organization is different
from the Exchange 2000 organization. Connection Agreements to different
Exchange 5.5 organizations must be created as inter-organizational
Connection Agreements. Select the inter-organizational Connection Agreement
checkbox on the advanced page before continuing. ID no:c103aa39 Microsoft
Active Directory Connector Management"

I am able to create an inter-organizational ADC. Looking at the
documentation, this may have been a mistake, as there is no way to undo
this. But at this time, I can view the exchange attributes in "Active
Directory Users and Computers".

If I try to upgrade the 5.5 site, I receive this message.
"The component "Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services"
cannot be assigned the action "Upgrade" because: -You must use the same
edition of Microsoft Exchange Setup (Enterprise or
Server) as the existing Location.
-Setup has detected that the Exchange 5.5 Site that your server belongs to
has not replicated to the Active Directory yet. You can either wait for
replication to complete and try the upgrade again or upgrade a server from a
site that has already been replicated to the AD." Probably because of the
first Install of Exchange 2000 with the different name.

What are my options at this point?
1.  Rebuild Active Directory? I have a Windows NT 4.0 machine running as
a
BDC. I could take my Win2000 machines offline, promote the BDC and upgrade
to 2000. Building a new schema.
2.  Install a child domain and install Exchange to that and migrate
users?
3.  Build a new forest completely and migrate users.
4.  Edit AD by a export and Import?
5.  Install Exchange 2000 into the site created by the Developer (GRRR)
and
reattach users to the mailboxes?


Please feel free to shootdown any of these halfbaked ideas, or suggest a
better course of action. I have to get IM up for the enterprise as soon as
possible! (Says the COO) Thanks, Steve




_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange Server Maintenance 5.5

[Thomas Di Nardo]

The space was freed up within the database. The database won't reduce in
size without compacting it. 

You might want to review the list archives. We've covered this at least
two times in the last week.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Jeff Toates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Server Maintenance 5.5

My exchange database seems to keep growing and growing.  We moved some
users from one server to another thinking that this would free up some
space on the original server.  Once we moved users it didn't free up any
additional space.  How do I free up that space?

Thanks,
Jeff

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Groups and such

[Morgan, Joshua]

Yes nesting DL's

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Groups and such


Do you mean nesting DLs?

-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Groups and such


How do you experienced Exchange Admins feel about nesting groups within
Exchange 5.5?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"One is glad to be of service "
--Robin Williams (Bicentennial Man)--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sharing info. between two Orgs

[Thomas Di Nardo]

The InterOrg Synchronization Tool and the InterOrg Replication Utility
are the tools you need.

Search TechNet for interorg and you'll find everything you need.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Minero Hector B DLVA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sharing info. between two Orgs


Hi all, due to some breakup in our company we're being forced to break
our
Org into two.

If we have two organizations, is there a way to replicate (share)
Address
books?
Is it possible to replicate (share) public folders?

What other issues should we consider?

Thanks in advance.


Hector Minero



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

at risk of being flamed, I am sending a short test message

[Steve Van Eck]

have sent in multiple messages and have not had any posted to the list.


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

unable to upgrade to exch 2000

[Steve Van Eck]

Several months back, it appears that a developer (GRRR) installed Exchange
2000 on a machine in the domain. Now that I am trying to upgrade our
Exchange 5.5 site, I am having several problems.
When I try to create an intra-organizational ADC I receive this error

“Unable to create an intra-organizational Connection Agreement using the
specified Exchange 5.5 Server. The Exchange 5.5 organization is different
from the Exchange 2000 organization. Connection Agreements to different
Exchange 5.5 organizations must be created as inter-organizational
Connection Agreements. Select the inter-organizational Connection Agreement
checkbox on the advanced page before continuing.
ID no:c103aa39
Microsoft Active Directory Connector Management”

I am able to create an inter-organizational ADC. Looking at the
documentation, this may have been a mistake, as there is no way to undo
this. But at this time, I can view the exchange attributes in “Active
Directory Users and Computers”.

If I try to upgrade the 5.5 site, I receive this message.
“The component "Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services"
cannot be assigned the action "Upgrade" because:
-You must use the same edition of Microsoft Exchange Setup (Enterprise or
Server) as the existing Location.
-Setup has detected that the Exchange 5.5 Site that your server belongs to
has not replicated to the Active Directory yet. You can either wait for
replication to complete and try the upgrade again or upgrade a server from a
site that has already been replicated to the AD.”
Probably because of the first Install of Exchange 2000 with the different
name.

What are my options at this point?
1.  Rebuild Active Directory? I have a Windows NT 4.0 machine running as a
BDC. I could take my Win2000 machines offline, promote the BDC and upgrade
to 2000. Building a new schema.
2.  Install a child domain and install Exchange to that and migrate users?
3.  Build a new forest completely and migrate users.
4.  Edit AD by a export and Import?
5.  Install Exchange 2000 into the site created by the Developer (GRRR) and
reattach users to the mailboxes?


Please feel free to shootdown any of these halfbaked ideas, or suggest a
better course of action. I have to get IM up for the enterprise as soon as
possible! (Says the COO)
Thanks,
Steve




_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance

[Minero Hector B DLVA]

Hector Minero
Systems Engineer
NSWCDD Code K55
Ph: (540)653-8859
Fax: (540)653-8575
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance


While Lori is wearing it.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance


While wearing it.


-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance


Wash thong daily.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance


Backup everynight.
Check backups and practice DR on recovery server frequently. Watch the logs.
Use good hardware. Never Drink Coors Lite.


-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance


Like all good Exchange Administrators, our job is to look for ways to ensure
that the corporate messaging system is in functioning in condition by
practicing routine maintenance.  I put it to the forum to supply their
thoughts on the best practices that they have on this matter.

Cheers,
Leonard Lee


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mario Fernandez
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag


I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should
ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything
I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these
utilities unless ther's a problem.  Anyone recommend otherwise.

Thanks for clearing the up the white space


Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
  e-mail disclaimer 


-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag


White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation
Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive

Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the
limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server
grows in number.  As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags
your Store, you will notice additional "white space."  Don't worry about it.
Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server.

Jim Blunt

-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag


After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase
the store size?


Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
  e-mail disclaimer 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-

exch upgrade to 2000 fails

[Steve Van Eck]

I am able to create an inter-organizational ADC. Looking at the 
documentation, this may have been a mistake, as there is no way to undo 
this. But at this time, I can view the exchange attributes in “Active 
Directory Users and Computers”.

If I try to upgrade the 5.5 site, I receive this message.
“The component "Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services" 
cannot be assigned the action "Upgrade" because:
-You must use the same edition of Microsoft Exchange Setup (Enterprise or 
Server) as the existing Location.
-Setup has detected that the Exchange 5.5 Site that your server belongs to 
has not replicated to the Active Directory yet. You can either wait for 
replication to complete and try the upgrade again or upgrade a server from a 
site that has already been replicated to the AD.”
Probably because of the first Install of Exchange 2000 with the different 
name.

What are my options at this point?
1.  Rebuild Active Directory? I have a Windows NT 4.0 machine running as a 
BDC. I could take my Win2000 machines offline, promote the BDC and upgrade 
to 2000. Building a new schema.
2.  Install a child domain and install Exchange to that and migrate users?
3.  Build a new forest completely and migrate users.
4.  Edit AD by a export and Import?
5.  Install Exchange 2000 into the site created by the Developer (GRRR) and 
reattach users to the mailboxes?


Please feel free to shootdown any of these halfbaked ideas, or suggest a 
better course of action. I have to get IM up for the enterprise as soon as 
possible! (Says the COO)

Thanks for your help!
Steve




_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hidden Distribuiton List in E2K

[Rodney]

I'd like to create distribution list that are hidden from the GAL BUT are
available to everyone who is in the DL.
Mail enabled security groups doesn't do this..

Thanks for the help

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange Server Maintenance 5.5

[Jeff Toates]

My exchange database seems to keep growing and growing.  We moved some
users from one server to another thinking that this would free up some
space on the original server.  Once we moved users it didn't free up any
additional space.  How do I free up that space?

Thanks,
Jeff

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Groups and such

[Joshua Morgan]

How do you experienced Exchange Admins feel about nesting groups within
Exchange 5.5?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"One is glad to be of service "
--Robin Williams (Bicentennial Man)--

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Groups and Such

[Morgan, Joshua]

How do you experienced Exchange Admins feel about nesting groups within
Exchange 5.5?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"One is glad to be of service "
--Robin Williams (Bicentennial Man)--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Netbackup Datacentre v3.41

[BY]

Dear all,

Netbackup Datacenter Master Server runs on Windows 2000 Server SP2
Netbackup Datacentre Exchange Agent version = v3.41

I don't understand why I can use Netbackup Exchange Agent to backup the
whole Exchange database successfully, but I cant use it to perform
mailbox level backup.

Whenever I want to backup mailbox level, it will stop after an hour
later with Error Status:41 , Network Connection timeout.

Please...if you have know why, let me know as even the consultant does
not why for nearly half a year now.

Thanks.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sharing info. between two Orgs

[Minero Hector B DLVA]

Hi all, due to some breakup in our company we're being forced to break our
Org into two.

If we have two organizations, is there a way to replicate (share) Address
books?
Is it possible to replicate (share) public folders?

What other issues should we consider?

Thanks in advance.


Hector Minero



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

failed exch 2000 upgrade

[Steve Van Eck]

Several months back, it appears that a developer (GRRR) installed Exchange 
2000 on a machine in the domain. Now that I am trying to upgrade our 
Exchange 5.5 site, I am having several problems.
When I try to create an intra-organizational ADC I receive this error

“Unable to create an intra-organizational Connection Agreement using the 
specified Exchange 5.5 Server. The Exchange 5.5 organization is different 
from the Exchange 2000 organization. Connection Agreements to different 
Exchange 5.5 organizations must be created as inter-organizational 
Connection Agreements. Select the inter-organizational Connection Agreement 
checkbox on the advanced page before continuing.
ID no:c103aa39
Microsoft Active Directory Connector Management”

I am able to create an inter-organizational ADC. Looking at the 
documentation, this may have been a mistake, as there is no way to undo 
this. But at this time, I can view the exchange attributes in “Active 
Directory Users and Computers”.

If I try to upgrade the 5.5 site, I receive this message.
“The component "Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services" 
cannot be assigned the action "Upgrade" because:
-You must use the same edition of Microsoft Exchange Setup (Enterprise or 
Server) as the existing Location.
-Setup has detected that the Exchange 5.5 Site that your server belongs to 
has not replicated to the Active Directory yet. You can either wait for 
replication to complete and try the upgrade again or upgrade a server from a 
site that has already been replicated to the AD.”
Probably because of the first Install of Exchange 2000 with the different 
name.

What are my options at this point?
1.  Rebuild Active Directory? I have a Windows NT 4.0 machine running as a 
BDC. I could take my Win2000 machines offline, promote the BDC and upgrade 
to 2000. Building a new schema.
2.  Install a child domain and install Exchange to that and migrate users?
3.  Build a new forest completely and migrate users.
4.  Edit AD by a export and Import?
5.  Install Exchange 2000 into the site created by the Developer (GRRR) and 
reattach users to the mailboxes?


Please feel free to shootdown any of these halfbaked ideas, or suggest a 
better course of action. I have to get IM up for the enterprise as soon as 
possible! (Says the COO)





_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

exchange 2000 server specific options

[kedar]

Hi all,

i wanted to configure mail forwarding from mail enabled user to mailbox
enabled user. From Active directory users & computers when i right mouse
click and go to the property page for the contact in exchange general i
don't see deliveray options...to set mail forwarding. Can anyone help me
how to overcome this problem???

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

POP3 Connector Needed

[kedar]

Hi All,

I know there is a pop3 connector available with Small Business Servers.
But i want to use with Windows 2000 Standradedition combination with
exchange 2000 standard edition...can anyone tell me if you have any
solution other than going for third party connectors

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4)

[Tony McCarthy]

Hi Paul,

Thanks very much for the advice. I did what you suggested and the problem
is now fixed. The files involved were mbdperf.dll, mtaperf.dll, perfdsa.dll
and msesperf.dll. That's a great relief. There's nothing like disappearing
e-mail to invoke the wrath of the users. Thanks again Paul.

Regards
Tony

Hi Tony,

Yeah, the sp upgrade is crucial to every file.  I cannot vouch for your
particular problem but with most probs after an sp this is the most usual
issue.  I had a major crash last night which got me onto a 23 hour day and
two hours of it could have been saved if the admin had actually ran sp4
successfully BEFORE calling me out (still fresh in my mind)!

Let me know how you get on.

Regards

Paul.


-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 19 March 2002 23:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4)


Thanks Paul,

I think there was at lease one file skipped when I installed SP4. I will
follow your advice and attempt a reinstall shortly.

Regards
Tony

Did you skip any files that the SP update said were in use?  You MUST
upgrade every last bit.

I would suggest re-running SP4, ensure that perfmon isn't running and
ensuring that every file is updated.  If it stops on a file that cannot be
updated then bosh out of the upgrade, rename the existing file and start
again.

Good luck

PBB
~ndi


-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 19 March 2002 22:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4)


Hi Everyone,

I installed Service Pack 4 on my Exchange 5.5 server last Friday and since
then all mail users have had a weird problem with disappearing mail in their
Outlook folders. At first the mail completely disappears when the user tries
to sort it by "Subject". It then returns when sorted by "From" or
"Received".
In a few cases mail cannot be displayed in the "Sent Items" folder at all. 
At first I thought it was just user error but the whole site has this
problem to one degree or another. Any ideas??

Regards
Tony


Tony McCarthy
Systems Engineer
OSI Software
Auckland
New Zealand
Ph:   64 09 522 5909 (Auckland)
Fax: 64 09 522 5901 (Auckland)
Mob: 021 703035 (NZ)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4)

[Paul Bouzan]

Hi Tony,

Yeah, the sp upgrade is crucial to every file.  I cannot vouch for your
particular problem but with most probs after an sp this is the most usual
issue.  I had a major crash last night which got me onto a 23 hour day and
two hours of it could have been saved if the admin had actually ran sp4
successfully BEFORE calling me out (still fresh in my mind)!

Let me know how you get on.

Regards

Paul.


-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 19 March 2002 23:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4)


Thanks Paul,

I think there was at lease one file skipped when I installed SP4. I will
follow your advice and attempt a reinstall shortly.

Regards
Tony

Did you skip any files that the SP update said were in use?  You MUST
upgrade every last bit.

I would suggest re-running SP4, ensure that perfmon isn't running and
ensuring that every file is updated.  If it stops on a file that cannot be
updated then bosh out of the upgrade, rename the existing file and start
again.

Good luck

PBB
~ndi


-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 19 March 2002 22:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4)


Hi Everyone,

I installed Service Pack 4 on my Exchange 5.5 server last Friday and since
then all mail users have had a weird problem with disappearing mail in their
Outlook folders. At first the mail completely disappears when the user tries
to sort it by "Subject". It then returns when sorted by "From" or
"Received".
In a few cases mail cannot be displayed in the "Sent Items" folder at all. 
At first I thought it was just user error but the whole site has this
problem to one degree or another. Any ideas??

Regards
Tony


Tony McCarthy
Systems Engineer
OSI Software
Auckland
New Zealand
Ph:   64 09 522 5909 (Auckland)
Fax: 64 09 522 5901 (Auckland)
Mob: 021 703035 (NZ)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: promoting E2K to a DC

[Thomas Di Nardo]

This is usually caused by network congestion. You can run a netmon trace
to confirm this is the cause in your case. If that's what's causing the
problem in your case, you can call PSS and get some information for
registry changes to tune the length of time that will pass before the
message box is presented or disable it altogether. 

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC

I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give "Requesting data from
Exchange
server" errors to users.
All users are using OLK2002. I have tried everything I know. To no
avail.
I have also tried to reset the OLK clients, still an issues.
It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine and then not,
then a nother user will expirence the same isse.
I would think it's a load issue, but w/ only 25 users on this ssytem,
there
is no way. Even checked w Prof monitor.
1GB mem, dual 550 Procs, 36 GB of free space
So I am thinking it's an issue with E2K DC communication.
So my fix is to promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it.
Any reason I should not?

Thank You,
 - John Q Jr.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: "Q" article confirmation

[David Lemson]

FYI this registry key was introduced in 5.5 SP1.

David

-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: "Q" article confirmation


 Yeah but I'm fed up with calling PSS, that's why I thought I could get
a easy answer here. I thought surely someone has made this registry hack
work.

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: "Q" article confirmation


The article says it's fixed in the next sp.  Since there was no sp
listed at the time of the article, and you're on sp4, they seem to think
you shouldn't have the problem.  

-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: "Q" article confirmation


 Oh sorry, I had posted on the weekend.
Exchange 5.5 SPK4 on NT4 SPK6a, my thinking is 
a typo in the article as it doesn't appear to 
work in it's present form.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: "Q" article confirmation


Version and SP? [1]

[1] Good Gawd, I sound like Precht




-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: "Q" article confirmation


 I've made a change to the registry as outlined in this "Q" article. It
does not appear to work at all.  If someone has made the same registry,
can you confirm that this works and it is the correct registry entry
(not a typo).
http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182010


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.



==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4)

[Tony McCarthy]

Thanks Paul,

I think there was at lease one file skipped when I installed SP4. I will
follow your advice and attempt a reinstall shortly.

Regards
Tony

Did you skip any files that the SP update said were in use?  You MUST
upgrade every last bit.

I would suggest re-running SP4, ensure that perfmon isn't running and
ensuring that every file is updated.  If it stops on a file that cannot be
updated then bosh out of the upgrade, rename the existing file and start
again.

Good luck

PBB
~ndi


-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 19 March 2002 22:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4)


Hi Everyone,

I installed Service Pack 4 on my Exchange 5.5 server last Friday and since
then all mail users have had a weird problem with disappearing mail in their
Outlook folders. At first the mail completely disappears when the user tries
to sort it by "Subject". It then returns when sorted by "From" or
"Received".
In a few cases mail cannot be displayed in the "Sent Items" folder at all. 
At first I thought it was just user error but the whole site has this
problem to one degree or another. Any ideas??

Regards
Tony


Tony McCarthy
Systems Engineer
OSI Software
Auckland
New Zealand
Ph:   64 09 522 5909 (Auckland)
Fax: 64 09 522 5901 (Auckland)
Mob: 021 703035 (NZ)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4)

[Paul Bouzan]

Did you skip any files that the SP update said were in use?  You MUST
upgrade every last bit.

I would suggest re-running SP4, ensure that perfmon isn't running and
ensuring that every file is updated.  If it stops on a file that cannot be
updated then bosh out of the upgrade, rename the existing file and start
again.

Good luck

PBB
~ndi


-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 19 March 2002 22:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4)


Hi Everyone,

I installed Service Pack 4 on my Exchange 5.5 server last Friday and since
then all mail users have had a weird problem with disappearing mail in their
Outlook folders. At first the mail completely disappears when the user tries
to sort it by "Subject". It then returns when sorted by "From" or
"Received".
In a few cases mail cannot be displayed in the "Sent Items" folder at all. 
At first I thought it was just user error but the whole site has this
problem to one degree or another. Any ideas??

Regards
Tony


Tony McCarthy
Systems Engineer
OSI Software
Auckland
New Zealand
Ph:   64 09 522 5909 (Auckland)
Fax: 64 09 522 5901 (Auckland)
Mob: 021 703035 (NZ)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!

[Daniel Chenault]

I am an officer; I pee where I wish and have ensigns like you to take care
of the rest. Carry on.

- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:24 PM
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


> Aye Sir. Remember Sir, we pee in the bowl, not around it.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!
>
>
> Thank you Ensign. You may return to your toilet-cleaning duties now.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:09 PM
> Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!
>
>
> > You're needed on the bridge Number One.
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:56 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!
> >
> >
> > Oh, ghod. Now Andy will be even more insufferable!
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Alverson, Thomas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:38 PM
> > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!
> >
> >
> > > OK, so maybe Perf Optimizer really wasn't needed.  Maybe just another
> > reboot
> > > was all that was needed but it is working again.  I was just about
ready
> > to
> > > give our new employee a hotmail address since I could not add him to
> > > exchange.
> > >
> > > One note:  When I ran perf optimizer it hung saying that it was
stopping
> > the
> > > system attendant.  I checked services and all the exchange stuff had
> > > stopped.  I killed perf opt. with taskman and started it again.  This
> time
> > > it saw that everything was stopped and went right to the options
screen.
> > It
> > > did not recommend any changes, yet asked if it was OK to automatically
> > move
> > > the files (which I OK'ed).  After reboot I could once again open the
IMS
> > > properties and also add new mailboxes.
> > >
> > > Thanks Andy!  I owe you (something?).
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:35 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin
program
> (
> > > hang s!) (V5.5)
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, give Perf Optimizer a shot and see what happens.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:33 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin
program
> (
> > > hang s!) (V5.5)
> > >
> > >
> > > Long ago we used it but have been fully migrated for a few years.  It
> was
> > > set to disabled in services (the msmail connector) and I don't recall
> > having
> > > clicked on it lately.
> > >
> > > I can view and change most of the properties in an existing mailbox
> EXCEPT
> > > for the email address tab.  If I try to add an additional address to
an
> > > existing mailbox I get the same hang (admin program not responding and
> has
> > > hourglass) as when I try to add a new mailbox.
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:14 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin
program
> (
> > > hang s!) (V5.5)
> > >
> > >
> > > Typically, you should run the Perm Optimizer after changes (Hard
drive,
> > RAM
> > > etc, though no necessarily NICS...) It may help to run it here as
well.
> > >
> > > Was the MSMAIL conn used at one time?
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:44 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin
program
> (
> > > hang s!) (V5.5)
> > >
> > >
> > > Opening is OK.  The only things that hang the admin program that I
have
> > > found so far is clicking on the IMS under connections (or also the no
> > longer
> > > in use msmail connector) and trying to add a mailbox.  I can navigate
> and
> > > open everything else I have tried including modifying an existing
> mailbox.
> > >
> > > Tom
> > > (starting to sweat...)
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:40 PM
> > > To: Alverson, Thomas M.
> > > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin
program
> (
> > > hang s!) (V5.5)
> > >
> > >
> > > So everything seems to work except opening the Admin pr

RE: POST-SP2 PROBLEM with OWA

[Paul Bouzan]

Shot in the dark and I haven't got my IIS servers in front of me but is the
bit that says 'How many users should this site be optimised for' not set to
somehing silly like less than 10 or something...?

PBB
~ndi


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 19 March 2002 22:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POST-SP2 PROBLEM with OWA


Logging in with UPN. Two-field prompt.

OWA worked without a glitch for more than a year before we applied SP2.
Certainly we NEVER had this problem. SP2 fixed a whole bunch of important
things but it sucks that it seems to have introduced this problem.

I restarted the server last Friday and it worked fine until late this
afternoon - started doing the same thing, rejecting the password. It prompts
three times, then displays "UNAUTHORIZED" as if you entered a wrong
password.

I use http://servername/exchange

Actually, I even tried going directly to the server's console, the IIS
Manager and right-clicking on Default Web Site/Exchange and choosing Browse.

Stopping/starting the Default Web Site does not help

Stopping/starting the WWW service does not help

I restarted the IIS Admin service (which bounced everything else) and that
helped.

I have a feeling that the server starts behaving this way after too many
hits. In the middle of the day it has close to 500 active concurrent
connections. But on the other hand, the CPU and Memory do not show any signs
of stress at all.

No errors or warnings in the Event logs.


Andrey Fyodorov
Senior Exchange Administrator
iNNERHOST
http://www.innerhost.com




-Original Message-
From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POST-SP2 PROBLEM with OWA


Are you getting prompting with a 2 or 3 tier prompt? If this is the
default website, can you get to http://servername? Are you logging in
with the UPN name or domain\username and password?

I think we need a little more information as to what exactly you are
seeing in the browser? If it prompts you 3 times for authentication,
does it return a 401.3 or something similar?

Mike

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POST-SP2 PROBLEM with OWA

It happened for the second time today. No errors or warnings in the
logs.
Simply all of a sudden users are not able to log in.

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: POST-SP2 PROBLEM with OWA


Hello everyone.

We have recently upgraded some of our Exchange 2000 servers from SP1 to
SP2.

Now they run fine for a couple of days and then all of a sudden users
cannot
log into OWA anymore. OWA is simply not accepting their passwords. We
have
to do an IIS reset to make OWA work again.

Anyone else with similar experience?

Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K

[William Lefkovics]

http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=24063

Looks like you need a subscription.[1]

William

[1] Hi Martin

-Original Message-
From: Richard Leslie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K


Ok, where do I find Martin Tuip's article?
- Original Message -
From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:10 PM
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K


> With OWA2000 over SSL, the entire session is encrypted.  With Hotmail, ony
> authentication is encrypted (I believe).
>
> AND you ought to read Martin Tuip's article on deploying IPSec to secure
the
> front end to back end communication for OWA.  Riveting stuff!!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:19 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
>
>
> More an aversion to using something (POP/IMAP) with passwords in clear
text
> and since Outlook doesn't support APOP we have to go over SSL. Having said
> all that, I have to do HTTP over SSL with OWA and a front-end/back-end
> topology anyway ... so I'll just get my coat :)
>
> Mylo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 19 March 2002 01:36
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
>
>
> Why? What's wrong with POP/IMAP?
>
> IMAP4 over SSL for example.
>
> Why would you rather give them Hotmail?
>
> William
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:38 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
>
>
> I'd be happier giving them a hotmail account than POP/IMAP..
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 18 March 2002 16:35
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
>
>
> Let's see -
>
> OWA = SSL
>
> POP/IMAP = doesn't happen on my network, but it it did, it would only be
via
> VPN
>
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Peregrine Systems
> Atlanta, GA
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:48 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
> >
> >
> > How do you guys secure exchange with OWA and POP/IMAP if you
> > don't put it in a DMZ?
> >
> >
> > Matt
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:44 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
> >
> >
> > There should be a rotating tag line appended to each message;
> >
> > "Exchange doesn't belong in the DMZ"
> > "PST=BAD"
> > "BLB=BAD"
> >
> > Etc
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: promoting E2K to a DC

[Paul Bouzan]

John, you don't give any indication that the clients fail to connect and/or
timeout.

I use Outlook XP at home to my 5.5 boxes at work via ISDN.  Routing is from
an 801 at home to a 3640 at work and I get requesting data (rd) all the
time.  Nothing serious but just latency - usually only for a few seconds.
All pings and tracerts show fine, I can VNC to any box on my wires
throughout the UK without problem but Outlook still gives me an rd box quite
frequently.  I use Outlook XP at work and very, very occasionally get an rd
though this is exception rather than norm (hi Norm!).  This is just a
feature of Outlook XP and may be exaggerating the issue.

I would say this is network traffic/DC loaded/client config/bad cat5 more
than anything else - not a fault with E2K.  It may be prudent to investigate
local traffic or client configs to see if they have any bearing on your
issue.

Regards

PBB
~ndi


-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 19 March 2002 20:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC


You know the location & or what CD this is located on?

- Original Message - 
From: "Stidley, Joel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:48 PM
Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC


How is your network setup?  Is your Exchange server behind a firewall or
VPN?  Do you have a GC close to the clients?  Have you done a netmon
trace to see at what point the problem is occurring?

Joel

-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC

I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give "Requesting data from
Exchange
server" errors to users.
All users are using OLK2002. I have tried everything I know. To no
avail.
I have also tried to reset the OLK clients, still an issues.
It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine and then not,
then a nother user will expirence the same isse.
I would think it's a load issue, but w/ only 25 users on this ssytem,
there
is no way. Even checked w Prof monitor.
1GB mem, dual 550 Procs, 36 GB of free space
So I am thinking it's an issue with E2K DC communication.
So my fix is to promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it.
Any reason I should not?

Thank You,
 - John Q Jr.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K

[Richard Leslie]

Ok, where do I find Martin Tuip's article?
- Original Message -
From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:10 PM
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K


> With OWA2000 over SSL, the entire session is encrypted.  With Hotmail, ony
> authentication is encrypted (I believe).
>
> AND you ought to read Martin Tuip's article on deploying IPSec to secure
the
> front end to back end communication for OWA.  Riveting stuff!!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:19 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
>
>
> More an aversion to using something (POP/IMAP) with passwords in clear
text
> and since Outlook doesn't support APOP we have to go over SSL. Having said
> all that, I have to do HTTP over SSL with OWA and a front-end/back-end
> topology anyway ... so I'll just get my coat :)
>
> Mylo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 19 March 2002 01:36
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
>
>
> Why? What's wrong with POP/IMAP?
>
> IMAP4 over SSL for example.
>
> Why would you rather give them Hotmail?
>
> William
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:38 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
>
>
> I'd be happier giving them a hotmail account than POP/IMAP..
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 18 March 2002 16:35
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
>
>
> Let's see -
>
> OWA = SSL
>
> POP/IMAP = doesn't happen on my network, but it it did, it would only be
via
> VPN
>
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Peregrine Systems
> Atlanta, GA
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:48 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
> >
> >
> > How do you guys secure exchange with OWA and POP/IMAP if you
> > don't put it in a DMZ?
> >
> >
> > Matt
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:44 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
> >
> >
> > There should be a rotating tag line appended to each message;
> >
> > "Exchange doesn't belong in the DMZ"
> > "PST=BAD"
> > "BLB=BAD"
> >
> > Etc
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Unable to upgrade to exch 2000

[Steve Postma]

Several months back, it appears that a developer (GRRR) installed Exchange
2000 on a machine in the domain. Now that I am trying to upgrade our
Exchange 5.5 site, I am having several problems.
When I try to create an intra-organizational ADC I receive this error

"Unable to create an intra-organizational Connection Agreement using the
specified Exchange 5.5 Server. The Exchange 5.5 organization is different
from the Exchange 2000 organization. Connection Agreements to different
Exchange 5.5 organizations must be created as inter-organizational
Connection Agreements. Select the inter-organizational Connection Agreement
checkbox on the advanced page before continuing.
ID no:c103aa39
Microsoft Active Directory Connector Management"

I am able to create an inter-organizational ADC. Looking at the
documentation, this may have been a mistake, as there is no way to undo
this. But at this time, I can view the exchange attributes in "Active
Directory Users and Computers".

If I try to upgrade the 5.5 site, I receive this message.
"The component "Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services"
cannot be assigned the action "Upgrade" because:
-You must use the same edition of Microsoft Exchange Setup (Enterprise or
Server) as the existing Location.
-Setup has detected that the Exchange 5.5 Site that your server belongs to
has not replicated to the Active Directory yet. You can either wait for
replication to complete and try the upgrade again or upgrade a server from a
site that has already been replicated to the AD."
Probably because of the first Install of Exchange 2000 with the different
name.

What are my options at this point?
1.  Rebuild Active Directory? I have a Windows NT 4.0 machine running as
a BDC. I could take my Win2000 machines offline, promote the BDC and upgrade
to 2000. Building a new schema.
2.  Install a child domain and install Exchange to that and migrate
users?
3.  Build a new forest completely and migrate users.
4.  Edit AD by a export and Import?
5.  Install Exchange 2000 into the site created by the Developer (GRRR)
and reattach users to the mailboxes?


Please feel free to shootdown any of these halfbaked ideas, or suggest a
better course of action. I have to get IM up for the enterprise as soon as
possible! (Says the COO)


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Some "Hosts Unreachable"

[Ben Schorr]

This is a new one on me; maybe some of you have seen it before.  Exchange
5.5 on NT4SP6a using the IMS to connect through an ISA server.  On a handful
of hosts the message queues up with a "Host Unreachable" error.  On most
hosts (including old favorites like aol.com, hotmail.com, etc.) mail comes
and goes just fine and we don't seem to be having any problems RECEIVING
mail.

But to this small band of hosts (including hawaii.edu and hawaii.rr.com) the
mail just queues up.  Here's a snippet from an SMTP log that may shed some
light:

3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : >>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=1977
RET=FULL
3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< IO: |250 2.1.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
|
3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< 250 2.1.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK
3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : >>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
NOTIFY=FAILURE,DELAY

3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< IO: |250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
|
3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< 250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : >>> DATA

3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< IO: |354 Start mail input; end with
.
|
3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< 354 Start mail input; end with
.
3/19/02 12:16:22 PM : 499 Host unreachable: cta.net.  Message
subject: ""Plain Text Test"".  Rescheduling delivery for later.

Notice that it seems to be going fine until it gets the 354 message, then it
sits for a little over a minute and seems to time out.  This particular test
message was just a couple of lines of plain text; so it shouldn't be a size
issue.

We've already restarted the IMS several times and the entire Exchange server
once.  Judging by the oldest message in the queue this problem seems to have
started this weekend and no unusual system maintenance or changes occurred
over the weekend.  As far as I know we were able to send mail to/from those
domains just fine on Friday.

Baffling.  Any thoughts on what might be causing this and how we can resolve
it?

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Migration question

[Williams Scott CTR]

Anyone used CompuSven's migration utilities?  If so, any feedback?  I'm
looking at this one from groupwise 5.5 to Exchange 5.5, Exchange 5.5 to
Exchange 5.5 (org to org), and Sendmail to Exchange 5.5.  A little over 20k
users.  

If not any other suggestions for migration tools?  

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4)

[Tony McCarthy]

Hi Everyone,

I installed Service Pack 4 on my Exchange 5.5 server last Friday and since
then all mail users have had a weird problem with disappearing mail in their
Outlook folders. At first the mail completely disappears when the user tries
to sort it by "Subject". It then returns when sorted by "From" or
"Received".
In a few cases mail cannot be displayed in the "Sent Items" folder at all. 
At first I thought it was just user error but the whole site has this
problem to one degree or another. Any ideas??

Regards
Tony


Tony McCarthy
Systems Engineer
OSI Software
Auckland
New Zealand
Ph:   64 09 522 5909 (Auckland)
Fax: 64 09 522 5901 (Auckland)
Mob: 021 703035 (NZ)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: POST-SP2 PROBLEM with OWA

[Andrey Fyodorov]

Logging in with UPN. Two-field prompt.

OWA worked without a glitch for more than a year before we applied SP2.
Certainly we NEVER had this problem. SP2 fixed a whole bunch of important
things but it sucks that it seems to have introduced this problem.

I restarted the server last Friday and it worked fine until late this
afternoon - started doing the same thing, rejecting the password. It prompts
three times, then displays "UNAUTHORIZED" as if you entered a wrong
password.

I use http://servername/exchange

Actually, I even tried going directly to the server's console, the IIS
Manager and right-clicking on Default Web Site/Exchange and choosing Browse.

Stopping/starting the Default Web Site does not help

Stopping/starting the WWW service does not help

I restarted the IIS Admin service (which bounced everything else) and that
helped.

I have a feeling that the server starts behaving this way after too many
hits. In the middle of the day it has close to 500 active concurrent
connections. But on the other hand, the CPU and Memory do not show any signs
of stress at all.

No errors or warnings in the Event logs.


Andrey Fyodorov
Senior Exchange Administrator
iNNERHOST
http://www.innerhost.com




-Original Message-
From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POST-SP2 PROBLEM with OWA


Are you getting prompting with a 2 or 3 tier prompt? If this is the
default website, can you get to http://servername? Are you logging in
with the UPN name or domain\username and password?

I think we need a little more information as to what exactly you are
seeing in the browser? If it prompts you 3 times for authentication,
does it return a 401.3 or something similar?

Mike

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POST-SP2 PROBLEM with OWA

It happened for the second time today. No errors or warnings in the
logs.
Simply all of a sudden users are not able to log in.

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: POST-SP2 PROBLEM with OWA


Hello everyone.

We have recently upgraded some of our Exchange 2000 servers from SP1 to
SP2.

Now they run fine for a couple of days and then all of a sudden users
cannot
log into OWA anymore. OWA is simply not accepting their passwords. We
have
to do an IIS reset to make OWA work again.

Anyone else with similar experience?

Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook & XP Home Edition

[Thomas Di Nardo]

Home Edition will work fine.

-Original Message-
From: Peter Blouin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook & XP Home Edition

I have a dialup user who needs to run Outlook at home and is connecting
to
Exchange 5.5 server. Can this be done on a system running XP Home
Edition
or does it need to be XP Pro because of domain authentication for the
mailbox?

TIA, Peter

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Outlook & XP Home Edition

[Peter Blouin]

I have a dialup user who needs to run Outlook at home and is connecting to
Exchange 5.5 server. Can this be done on a system running XP Home Edition
or does it need to be XP Pro because of domain authentication for the
mailbox?

TIA, Peter

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K

[William Lefkovics]

With OWA2000 over SSL, the entire session is encrypted.  With Hotmail, ony
authentication is encrypted (I believe).

AND you ought to read Martin Tuip's article on deploying IPSec to secure the
front end to back end communication for OWA.  Riveting stuff!!


-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K


More an aversion to using something (POP/IMAP) with passwords in clear text
and since Outlook doesn't support APOP we have to go over SSL. Having said
all that, I have to do HTTP over SSL with OWA and a front-end/back-end
topology anyway ... so I'll just get my coat :) 

Mylo

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 March 2002 01:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K


Why? What's wrong with POP/IMAP?

IMAP4 over SSL for example. 

Why would you rather give them Hotmail?

William


-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K


I'd be happier giving them a hotmail account than POP/IMAP..

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 March 2002 16:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K


Let's see -

OWA = SSL

POP/IMAP = doesn't happen on my network, but it it did, it would only be via
VPN

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:48 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
> 
> 
> How do you guys secure exchange with OWA and POP/IMAP if you 
> don't put it in a DMZ?  
> 
>  
> Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:44 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
> 
> 
> There should be a rotating tag line appended to each message;
> 
> "Exchange doesn't belong in the DMZ"
> "PST=BAD"
> "BLB=BAD"
> 
> Etc

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Digital Signatures and Custom Forms

[Thomas Di Nardo]

Q279106

-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Digital Signatures and Custom Forms

Is anyone using digital signatures with custom forms?  We've been asked
to implement a form for an approval process that must route to several
levels of management within the company.  We want to use digital
signatures to make this a "legal" document.  Right now, I have the form
made (first draft) and can route it to different people, but it only
seems to keep track of the signature of the last person to send the
form.  Is there a way to track multiple signatures on a custom form?  We
are running E2K Sp1.  The certificates were issued internally by our CA.

Thanks.
Tara


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: NAV for Gateways

[Tom Meunier]

Yeah, you'll just put those three domains into your relaying list.
Leave Exchange the way you already had it.  

I find it to be better than an "extra layer" of protection; it does the
attachment and subject line blocking, and blocking based on message
size, so you can take that load off your Exchange server and quarantine
them separately.  I'd say 95% of the problems get stripped out by policy
before they even hit the virus engine.

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:38 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: NAV for Gateways
Subject: RE: NAV for Gateways


just 3 domains here.  so, am i correct in surmising that you deny
relaying on the gateway box except for mail destined for those 3
domains, and don't have to change any settings on the exchange boxen?

Jeremy

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Gateways


Works good here.  Are you running more than a few dozen domains?  If so,
it gets unweildy - it doesn't handle wildcards properly.  So you have to
enter each domain by hand, that you want it to relay for.

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:55 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!
Subject: NAV for Gateways


Has anyone played with this?  Are there any ramifications for the
exchange (2000) server sitting behind it with regards to relaying, etc?
It would appear to be good additional AV protection.

Jeremy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Forms Assessment

[Thomas Di Nardo]

I know you already have the answer, but just in case someone else is
looking to do it, take a look at Q258959. If you save a copy of the
forms to a folder you should be able to accomplish the task using
mdbvu32.exe.

Tom.
 
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forms Assessment

I wasn't asking how to back them up I wanted to export the list to a
file so
I didn't have to go through and manually do it...it is already done
though
thanks.

 -Original Message-
From:   Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Forms Assessment

I can't believe that MCS doesn't know how to backup forms.  You can
achieve
what you want very easily.  It's in Outlook, Options, Other...

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forms Assessment


I was not intending to be sarcastic.  I am working with MCS now, and
they
didn't know how to do it...I was trying to find out if any of you guys
knew
how before I started a very long and tedious process of manually
collecting
the information.


 -Original Message-
From:   Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, March 12, 2002 3:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Forms Assessment

If you want a faster response, call PSS.

-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forms Assessment

Does no one know how to do this or was this a dumb question?

-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken 
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forms Assessment


Is there a way to export all of the organizational form data and or
information?  At the very least I would like to be able to extract all
of
the names of the forms so I can go in manually and add information, but
would like to be able to quickly download all of the forms for quicker
access.  Any help would be appreciated.  I have hundreds of forms that I
need to gather information on in preperation for Ex2K.

thanks
Ken

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: NAV for Gateways

[Jeremy Pinquist]

just 3 domains here.  so, am i correct in surmising that you deny relaying on the 
gateway box except for mail destined for those 3 domains, and don't have to change any 
settings on the exchange boxen?

Jeremy

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Gateways


Works good here.  Are you running more than a few dozen domains?  If so,
it gets unweildy - it doesn't handle wildcards properly.  So you have to
enter each domain by hand, that you want it to relay for.

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:55 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!
Subject: NAV for Gateways


Has anyone played with this?  Are there any ramifications for the
exchange (2000) server sitting behind it with regards to relaying, etc?
It would appear to be good additional AV protection.

Jeremy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: NAV for Gateways

[Tom Meunier]

Works good here.  Are you running more than a few dozen domains?  If so,
it gets unweildy - it doesn't handle wildcards properly.  So you have to
enter each domain by hand, that you want it to relay for.

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:55 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!
Subject: NAV for Gateways


Has anyone played with this?  Are there any ramifications for the
exchange (2000) server sitting behind it with regards to relaying, etc?
It would appear to be good additional AV protection.

Jeremy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!

[Andy David]

Aye Sir. Remember Sir, we pee in the bowl, not around it.


-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


Thank you Ensign. You may return to your toilet-cleaning duties now.

- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:09 PM
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


> You're needed on the bridge Number One.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:56 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!
>
>
> Oh, ghod. Now Andy will be even more insufferable!
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Alverson, Thomas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:38 PM
> Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!
>
>
> > OK, so maybe Perf Optimizer really wasn't needed.  Maybe just another
> reboot
> > was all that was needed but it is working again.  I was just about ready
> to
> > give our new employee a hotmail address since I could not add him to
> > exchange.
> >
> > One note:  When I ran perf optimizer it hung saying that it was stopping
> the
> > system attendant.  I checked services and all the exchange stuff had
> > stopped.  I killed perf opt. with taskman and started it again.  This
time
> > it saw that everything was stopped and went right to the options screen.
> It
> > did not recommend any changes, yet asked if it was OK to automatically
> move
> > the files (which I OK'ed).  After reboot I could once again open the IMS
> > properties and also add new mailboxes.
> >
> > Thanks Andy!  I owe you (something?).
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:35 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(
> > hang s!) (V5.5)
> >
> >
> > Well, give Perf Optimizer a shot and see what happens.
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:33 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(
> > hang s!) (V5.5)
> >
> >
> > Long ago we used it but have been fully migrated for a few years.  It
was
> > set to disabled in services (the msmail connector) and I don't recall
> having
> > clicked on it lately.
> >
> > I can view and change most of the properties in an existing mailbox
EXCEPT
> > for the email address tab.  If I try to add an additional address to an
> > existing mailbox I get the same hang (admin program not responding and
has
> > hourglass) as when I try to add a new mailbox.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:14 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(
> > hang s!) (V5.5)
> >
> >
> > Typically, you should run the Perm Optimizer after changes (Hard drive,
> RAM
> > etc, though no necessarily NICS...) It may help to run it here as well.
> >
> > Was the MSMAIL conn used at one time?
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:44 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(
> > hang s!) (V5.5)
> >
> >
> > Opening is OK.  The only things that hang the admin program that I have
> > found so far is clicking on the IMS under connections (or also the no
> longer
> > in use msmail connector) and trying to add a mailbox.  I can navigate
and
> > open everything else I have tried including modifying an existing
mailbox.
> >
> > Tom
> > (starting to sweat...)
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:40 PM
> > To: Alverson, Thomas M.
> > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(
> > hang s!) (V5.5)
> >
> >
> > So everything seems to work except opening the Admin program?
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:25 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(
> > hang s!) (V5.5)
> >
> >
> > It was hard-coded.  I wrote down the IP, netmask and gateway address and
> > typed them into the new tcp/ip settings.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Richard Leslie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:21 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: Chang

RE: Hide User from GAL

[John Matteson]

Creating a different view of the address list, one for local users and one
for remote users, but then again, why?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones



-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hide User from GAL


Why would you want to do that?  If you have to hide them, then why have
them?

-Original Message-
From: Hassan Mukhtar Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hide User from GAL


Hello every one ,

We have Exchange Server 5.5 , we Successfully import users to our server
in a seperate container , the problem is how can i hide these remote users
from GAL and at the smae time keep them in their container so our user can
see them from outlook when our users want to send email to them...


Thanks for your help in advance


Hassan Mukhtar

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Hide User from GAL

[Martin Blackstone]

They need to be hidden so people cant see them. But then people should be
able to see them when they are hidden. Therefore they should be hiddenly
visable.

M hidden valley farms.

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hide User from GAL


Why would you want to do that?  If you have to hide them, then why have
them?

-Original Message-
From: Hassan Mukhtar Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hide User from GAL


Hello every one ,

We have Exchange Server 5.5 , we Successfully import users to our server in
a seperate container , the problem is how can i hide these remote users from
GAL and at the smae time keep them in their container so our user can see
them from outlook when our users want to send email to them...


Thanks for your help in advance


Hassan Mukhtar

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Hide User from GAL

[Hunter, Lori]

Why would you want to do that?  If you have to hide them, then why have
them?

-Original Message-
From: Hassan Mukhtar Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hide User from GAL


Hello every one ,

We have Exchange Server 5.5 , we Successfully import users to our server
in a seperate container , the problem is how can i hide these remote users
from GAL and at the smae time keep them in their container so our user can
see them from outlook when our users want to send email to them...


Thanks for your help in advance


Hassan Mukhtar

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!

[Martin Blackstone]

No. She needed all of me in the bowl.

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


Wasn't she the one that needed to go "back in the bowl" in "All of Me"?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


Congrats. Glad it worked. 
I'll take an 8x7 color photo of Edwina Butkis.



-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:38 PM
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Cc: Andy David
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


OK, so maybe Perf Optimizer really wasn't needed.  Maybe just another reboot
was all that was needed but it is working again.  I was just about ready to
give our new employee a hotmail address since I could not add him to
exchange.

One note:  When I ran perf optimizer it hung saying that it was stopping the
system attendant.  I checked services and all the exchange stuff had
stopped.  I killed perf opt. with taskman and started it again.  This time
it saw that everything was stopped and went right to the options screen.  It
did not recommend any changes, yet asked if it was OK to automatically move
the files (which I OK'ed).  After reboot I could once again open the IMS
properties and also add new mailboxes.

Thanks Andy!  I owe you (something?).

Tom

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Well, give Perf Optimizer a shot and see what happens. 


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Long ago we used it but have been fully migrated for a few years.  It was
set to disabled in services (the msmail connector) and I don't recall having
clicked on it lately.

I can view and change most of the properties in an existing mailbox EXCEPT
for the email address tab.  If I try to add an additional address to an
existing mailbox I get the same hang (admin program not responding and has
hourglass) as when I try to add a new mailbox.

Tom


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Typically, you should run the Perm Optimizer after changes (Hard drive, RAM
etc, though no necessarily NICS...) It may help to run it here as well.

Was the MSMAIL conn used at one time?


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Opening is OK.  The only things that hang the admin program that I have
found so far is clicking on the IMS under connections (or also the no longer
in use msmail connector) and trying to add a mailbox.  I can navigate and
open everything else I have tried including modifying an existing mailbox.

Tom
(starting to sweat...)

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:40 PM
To: Alverson, Thomas M.
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


So everything seems to work except opening the Admin program?



-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


It was hard-coded.  I wrote down the IP, netmask and gateway address and
typed them into the new tcp/ip settings.

-Original Message-
From: Richard Leslie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(hang s!) (V5.5)


Might not be related, but a changed NIC means a changed MAC.  Was the server
IP address reserved or static?

- Original Message -
From: "Alverson, Thomas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:52 AM
Subject: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (hang
s!) (V5.5)


> I have an excha

Re: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!

[Daniel Chenault]

Thank you Ensign. You may return to your toilet-cleaning duties now.

- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:09 PM
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


> You're needed on the bridge Number One.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:56 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!
>
>
> Oh, ghod. Now Andy will be even more insufferable!
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Alverson, Thomas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:38 PM
> Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!
>
>
> > OK, so maybe Perf Optimizer really wasn't needed.  Maybe just another
> reboot
> > was all that was needed but it is working again.  I was just about ready
> to
> > give our new employee a hotmail address since I could not add him to
> > exchange.
> >
> > One note:  When I ran perf optimizer it hung saying that it was stopping
> the
> > system attendant.  I checked services and all the exchange stuff had
> > stopped.  I killed perf opt. with taskman and started it again.  This
time
> > it saw that everything was stopped and went right to the options screen.
> It
> > did not recommend any changes, yet asked if it was OK to automatically
> move
> > the files (which I OK'ed).  After reboot I could once again open the IMS
> > properties and also add new mailboxes.
> >
> > Thanks Andy!  I owe you (something?).
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:35 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(
> > hang s!) (V5.5)
> >
> >
> > Well, give Perf Optimizer a shot and see what happens.
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:33 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(
> > hang s!) (V5.5)
> >
> >
> > Long ago we used it but have been fully migrated for a few years.  It
was
> > set to disabled in services (the msmail connector) and I don't recall
> having
> > clicked on it lately.
> >
> > I can view and change most of the properties in an existing mailbox
EXCEPT
> > for the email address tab.  If I try to add an additional address to an
> > existing mailbox I get the same hang (admin program not responding and
has
> > hourglass) as when I try to add a new mailbox.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:14 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(
> > hang s!) (V5.5)
> >
> >
> > Typically, you should run the Perm Optimizer after changes (Hard drive,
> RAM
> > etc, though no necessarily NICS...) It may help to run it here as well.
> >
> > Was the MSMAIL conn used at one time?
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:44 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(
> > hang s!) (V5.5)
> >
> >
> > Opening is OK.  The only things that hang the admin program that I have
> > found so far is clicking on the IMS under connections (or also the no
> longer
> > in use msmail connector) and trying to add a mailbox.  I can navigate
and
> > open everything else I have tried including modifying an existing
mailbox.
> >
> > Tom
> > (starting to sweat...)
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:40 PM
> > To: Alverson, Thomas M.
> > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(
> > hang s!) (V5.5)
> >
> >
> > So everything seems to work except opening the Admin program?
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:25 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(
> > hang s!) (V5.5)
> >
> >
> > It was hard-coded.  I wrote down the IP, netmask and gateway address and
> > typed them into the new tcp/ip settings.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Richard Leslie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:21 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
> > (hang s!) (V5.5)
> >
> >
> > Might not be related, but a changed NIC means a changed MAC.  Was the
> server
> > IP address reserved or static?
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "A

RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!

[John Matteson]

Wasn't she the one that needed to go "back in the bowl" in "All of Me"?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


Congrats. Glad it worked. 
I'll take an 8x7 color photo of Edwina Butkis.



-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:38 PM
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Cc: Andy David
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


OK, so maybe Perf Optimizer really wasn't needed.  Maybe just another reboot
was all that was needed but it is working again.  I was just about ready to
give our new employee a hotmail address since I could not add him to
exchange.

One note:  When I ran perf optimizer it hung saying that it was stopping the
system attendant.  I checked services and all the exchange stuff had
stopped.  I killed perf opt. with taskman and started it again.  This time
it saw that everything was stopped and went right to the options screen.  It
did not recommend any changes, yet asked if it was OK to automatically move
the files (which I OK'ed).  After reboot I could once again open the IMS
properties and also add new mailboxes.

Thanks Andy!  I owe you (something?).

Tom

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Well, give Perf Optimizer a shot and see what happens. 


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Long ago we used it but have been fully migrated for a few years.  It was
set to disabled in services (the msmail connector) and I don't recall having
clicked on it lately.

I can view and change most of the properties in an existing mailbox EXCEPT
for the email address tab.  If I try to add an additional address to an
existing mailbox I get the same hang (admin program not responding and has
hourglass) as when I try to add a new mailbox.

Tom


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Typically, you should run the Perm Optimizer after changes (Hard drive, RAM
etc, though no necessarily NICS...) It may help to run it here as well.

Was the MSMAIL conn used at one time?


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Opening is OK.  The only things that hang the admin program that I have
found so far is clicking on the IMS under connections (or also the no longer
in use msmail connector) and trying to add a mailbox.  I can navigate and
open everything else I have tried including modifying an existing mailbox.

Tom
(starting to sweat...)

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:40 PM
To: Alverson, Thomas M.
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


So everything seems to work except opening the Admin program?



-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


It was hard-coded.  I wrote down the IP, netmask and gateway address and
typed them into the new tcp/ip settings.

-Original Message-
From: Richard Leslie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(hang s!) (V5.5)


Might not be related, but a changed NIC means a changed MAC.  Was the server
IP address reserved or static?

- Original Message -
From: "Alverson, Thomas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:52 AM
Subject: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (hang
s!) (V5.5)


> I have an exchange 5.5 sp4 server that has been working fine for 
> years.
On
> Saturday I shut it down to replace the network card (3c905) with a new 
> one (intel gigabyte desktop T).  At the same time I also ran windows 
> update
> (http://w

RE: Groups and such

[Ray Zorz]

Only if they're on the endangered species list. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Groups and such


How do you experienced Exchange Admins feel about nesting groups within
Exchange 5.5?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"One is glad to be of service "
--Robin Williams (Bicentennial Man)--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.338 / Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 3/14/2002


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!

[Martin Blackstone]

Bodacious!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


Congrats. Glad it worked. 
I'll take an 8x7 color photo of Edwina Butkis.



-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:38 PM
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Cc: Andy David
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


OK, so maybe Perf Optimizer really wasn't needed.  Maybe just another reboot
was all that was needed but it is working again.  I was just about ready to
give our new employee a hotmail address since I could not add him to
exchange.

One note:  When I ran perf optimizer it hung saying that it was stopping the
system attendant.  I checked services and all the exchange stuff had
stopped.  I killed perf opt. with taskman and started it again.  This time
it saw that everything was stopped and went right to the options screen.  It
did not recommend any changes, yet asked if it was OK to automatically move
the files (which I OK'ed).  After reboot I could once again open the IMS
properties and also add new mailboxes.

Thanks Andy!  I owe you (something?).

Tom

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Well, give Perf Optimizer a shot and see what happens. 


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Long ago we used it but have been fully migrated for a few years.  It was
set to disabled in services (the msmail connector) and I don't recall having
clicked on it lately.

I can view and change most of the properties in an existing mailbox EXCEPT
for the email address tab.  If I try to add an additional address to an
existing mailbox I get the same hang (admin program not responding and has
hourglass) as when I try to add a new mailbox.

Tom


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Typically, you should run the Perm Optimizer after changes (Hard drive, RAM
etc, though no necessarily NICS...) It may help to run it here as well.

Was the MSMAIL conn used at one time?


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Opening is OK.  The only things that hang the admin program that I have
found so far is clicking on the IMS under connections (or also the no longer
in use msmail connector) and trying to add a mailbox.  I can navigate and
open everything else I have tried including modifying an existing mailbox.

Tom
(starting to sweat...)

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:40 PM
To: Alverson, Thomas M.
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


So everything seems to work except opening the Admin program?



-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


It was hard-coded.  I wrote down the IP, netmask and gateway address and
typed them into the new tcp/ip settings.

-Original Message-
From: Richard Leslie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(hang s!) (V5.5)


Might not be related, but a changed NIC means a changed MAC.  Was the server
IP address reserved or static?

- Original Message -
From: "Alverson, Thomas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:52 AM
Subject: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (hang
s!) (V5.5)


> I have an exchange 5.5 sp4 server that has been working fine for 
> years.
On
> Saturday I shut it down to replace the network card (3c905) with a new 
> one (intel gigabyte desktop T).  At the same time I also ran windows 
> update
> (http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com) and applied the critical updates
(that
> were just for IE6 I believe).  After starting it up everything seemed 
> to work fine.
>
> This morning I tried to use the Exchange ADMIN program to view the IMS
queue
> and the admin program just hangs when I select connections/ims.  It 
> must
be

RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!

[Andy David]

You're needed on the bridge Number One.


-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


Oh, ghod. Now Andy will be even more insufferable!

- Original Message -
From: "Alverson, Thomas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


> OK, so maybe Perf Optimizer really wasn't needed.  Maybe just another
reboot
> was all that was needed but it is working again.  I was just about ready
to
> give our new employee a hotmail address since I could not add him to
> exchange.
>
> One note:  When I ran perf optimizer it hung saying that it was stopping
the
> system attendant.  I checked services and all the exchange stuff had
> stopped.  I killed perf opt. with taskman and started it again.  This time
> it saw that everything was stopped and went right to the options screen.
It
> did not recommend any changes, yet asked if it was OK to automatically
move
> the files (which I OK'ed).  After reboot I could once again open the IMS
> properties and also add new mailboxes.
>
> Thanks Andy!  I owe you (something?).
>
> Tom
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:35 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
> hang s!) (V5.5)
>
>
> Well, give Perf Optimizer a shot and see what happens.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
> hang s!) (V5.5)
>
>
> Long ago we used it but have been fully migrated for a few years.  It was
> set to disabled in services (the msmail connector) and I don't recall
having
> clicked on it lately.
>
> I can view and change most of the properties in an existing mailbox EXCEPT
> for the email address tab.  If I try to add an additional address to an
> existing mailbox I get the same hang (admin program not responding and has
> hourglass) as when I try to add a new mailbox.
>
> Tom
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:14 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
> hang s!) (V5.5)
>
>
> Typically, you should run the Perm Optimizer after changes (Hard drive,
RAM
> etc, though no necessarily NICS...) It may help to run it here as well.
>
> Was the MSMAIL conn used at one time?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
> hang s!) (V5.5)
>
>
> Opening is OK.  The only things that hang the admin program that I have
> found so far is clicking on the IMS under connections (or also the no
longer
> in use msmail connector) and trying to add a mailbox.  I can navigate and
> open everything else I have tried including modifying an existing mailbox.
>
> Tom
> (starting to sweat...)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:40 PM
> To: Alverson, Thomas M.
> Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
> hang s!) (V5.5)
>
>
> So everything seems to work except opening the Admin program?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:25 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
> hang s!) (V5.5)
>
>
> It was hard-coded.  I wrote down the IP, netmask and gateway address and
> typed them into the new tcp/ip settings.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Leslie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:21 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
> (hang s!) (V5.5)
>
>
> Might not be related, but a changed NIC means a changed MAC.  Was the
server
> IP address reserved or static?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Alverson, Thomas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:52 AM
> Subject: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (hang
> s!) (V5.5)
>
>
> > I have an exchange 5.5 sp4 server that has been working fine for
> > years.
> On
> > Saturday I shut it down to replace the network card (3c905) with a new
> > one (intel gigabyte desktop T).  At the same time I also ran windows
> > update
> > (http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com) and applied the critical updates
> (that
> > we

RE: Groups and such

[Soysal, Serdar]

If I need to do it, I do it.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Groups and such


How do you experienced Exchange Admins feel about nesting groups within
Exchange 5.5?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"One is glad to be of service "
--Robin Williams (Bicentennial Man)--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Groups and such

[John Matteson]

If you are talking about Distribution lists, there is no problem with that.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones



-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Groups and such


How do you experienced Exchange Admins feel about nesting groups within
Exchange 5.5?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"One is glad to be of service "
--Robin Williams (Bicentennial Man)--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Groups and such

[Hunter, Lori]

Do you mean nesting DLs?

-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Groups and such


How do you experienced Exchange Admins feel about nesting groups within
Exchange 5.5?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"One is glad to be of service "
--Robin Williams (Bicentennial Man)--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Groups and such

[Andy David]

Too many nests will break your eggs.


-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Groups and such


How do you experienced Exchange Admins feel about nesting groups within
Exchange 5.5?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"One is glad to be of service "
--Robin Williams (Bicentennial Man)--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Tracking an Email Message

[Dillon, Jeff]

Roach-Court:  "Las cuckarachas entren, pero no pueden salir!"

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


Never. They, like cockroaches, reproduce too quickly to get them all.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones



-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


Next Thursday if that's ok with everyone else. How long do you think it
will take for us to finish them off?
-Chris

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dillon, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


What's clearly criminal is the length of Damien's disclaimer.  The email
thingie is always covered in the company policy manual, the receipt of
which you attest under threat of non-employment. So when DO we start
shooting the lawyers?

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


AFAIK, as long as the company has a published and communicated policy
that says something like "we can look at your mail anytime we want, and
by agreeing to work here you also agree to this" there is nothing
criminal about it.  Besides, if it was a criminal offense as you've
suggested the vendors that supply content filtering software would go
out of business since the usage of their products would become illegal.

But, this question is best left to the company lawyers.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


Were do you get the information that it is criminal?  I certainly don't
agree with it, but my understanding is that current case law (at least
in my
state) actually supports that if it is a business account the business
is who owns it.

-Original Message-
From: Damien D Keffyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Tracking an Email Message


I agree this could turn nasty on you, dont do it, make sure you have it 
in writing and signed by the management first before you even attempt
this. Trust me when it goes down and you dont have it in writing they
will 
take you with them. After all you are the tech that "advised" them this 
was possible, at least that is the way it will sound when they get 
dragged through court.

It is a criminal offence to read someone elses email without thier 
consent, or a warrant.

-- 
Regards

*/Damien D Keffyn/*
Senior I.T. Administrator
(Australia)

*Ph:*61 3 9334 5010
*Ph:*61 4 3824 3897
*Fax:   *61 3 9334 5875
*Mobile:*0438 243 897
*Email: *[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*Level 1, 1 Apac Drive 
(Aviation House)
Melbourne International Airport
Tullamarine, 3043, Victoria*

DISCLAIMER 
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged and is intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed. If the message is received and you are
not the addressee, you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this e-mail.  Any views expressed in this message are those
of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states
them to be the views of the John Menzies plc group of companies All
messages are checked for viruses, but we strongly recommend that you
check for viruses using your own virus scanner. No member of the John
Menzies plc group of companies will take responsibility for any damage
caused as a result of virus infection. At present the integrity of
e-mail across the Internet cannot be guaranteed. Therefore no member of
the John Menzies plc group of companies will accept liability for any
claims arising as a result of the use of this medium for transmissions
by or any member of the John Menzies plc group of companies



Louis Joyce wrote:

>You might want to check with your legal department before continuing 
>down this alley.
>
>Regards
>
>Mr Louis Joyce
>Data Support Analyst
>BT Ignite eSolutions
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Exchange Newsgroups [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: 13 March 2002 00:10
>>To:   Exchange Discussions
>>Subject:  Tracking an Email Message
>>
>>I have been asked by the management to have a copy of a users 
>>incomming and outgoing emails to be reviewed by them.  I know how to 
>>setup the incomming by forwarding but how do you do that for outgoing?

RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!

[Andy David]

Congrats. Glad it worked. 
I'll take an 8x7 color photo of Edwina Butkis.



-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:38 PM
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Cc: Andy David
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


OK, so maybe Perf Optimizer really wasn't needed.  Maybe just another reboot
was all that was needed but it is working again.  I was just about ready to
give our new employee a hotmail address since I could not add him to
exchange.

One note:  When I ran perf optimizer it hung saying that it was stopping the
system attendant.  I checked services and all the exchange stuff had
stopped.  I killed perf opt. with taskman and started it again.  This time
it saw that everything was stopped and went right to the options screen.  It
did not recommend any changes, yet asked if it was OK to automatically move
the files (which I OK'ed).  After reboot I could once again open the IMS
properties and also add new mailboxes.

Thanks Andy!  I owe you (something?).

Tom

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Well, give Perf Optimizer a shot and see what happens. 


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Long ago we used it but have been fully migrated for a few years.  It was
set to disabled in services (the msmail connector) and I don't recall having
clicked on it lately.

I can view and change most of the properties in an existing mailbox EXCEPT
for the email address tab.  If I try to add an additional address to an
existing mailbox I get the same hang (admin program not responding and has
hourglass) as when I try to add a new mailbox.

Tom


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Typically, you should run the Perm Optimizer after changes (Hard drive, RAM
etc, though no necessarily NICS...) It may help to run it here as well.

Was the MSMAIL conn used at one time?


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Opening is OK.  The only things that hang the admin program that I have
found so far is clicking on the IMS under connections (or also the no longer
in use msmail connector) and trying to add a mailbox.  I can navigate and
open everything else I have tried including modifying an existing mailbox.

Tom
(starting to sweat...)

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:40 PM
To: Alverson, Thomas M.
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


So everything seems to work except opening the Admin program?



-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


It was hard-coded.  I wrote down the IP, netmask and gateway address and
typed them into the new tcp/ip settings.

-Original Message-
From: Richard Leslie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(hang s!) (V5.5)


Might not be related, but a changed NIC means a changed MAC.  Was the server
IP address reserved or static?

- Original Message -
From: "Alverson, Thomas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:52 AM
Subject: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (hang
s!) (V5.5)


> I have an exchange 5.5 sp4 server that has been working fine for
> years.
On
> Saturday I shut it down to replace the network card (3c905) with a new
> one (intel gigabyte desktop T).  At the same time I also ran windows 
> update
> (http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com) and applied the critical updates
(that
> were just for IE6 I believe).  After starting it up everything seemed
> to work fine.
>
> This morning I tried to use the Exchange ADMIN program to view the IMS
queue
> and the admin program just hangs when I select connections/ims.  It
> must
be
> killed with task manager.  I tried the admin program both on the
> server
and
> also on a separate client machine which used to work.  Both hang the
> admin program when IMS is selected.  Every thing el

NAV for Gateways

[Jeremy Pinquist]

Has anyone played with this?  Are there any ramifications for the exchange (2000) 
server sitting behind it with regards to relaying, etc?  It would appear to be good 
additional AV protection.

Jeremy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!

[Daniel Chenault]

Oh, ghod. Now Andy will be even more insufferable!

- Original Message -
From: "Alverson, Thomas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


> OK, so maybe Perf Optimizer really wasn't needed.  Maybe just another
reboot
> was all that was needed but it is working again.  I was just about ready
to
> give our new employee a hotmail address since I could not add him to
> exchange.
>
> One note:  When I ran perf optimizer it hung saying that it was stopping
the
> system attendant.  I checked services and all the exchange stuff had
> stopped.  I killed perf opt. with taskman and started it again.  This time
> it saw that everything was stopped and went right to the options screen.
It
> did not recommend any changes, yet asked if it was OK to automatically
move
> the files (which I OK'ed).  After reboot I could once again open the IMS
> properties and also add new mailboxes.
>
> Thanks Andy!  I owe you (something?).
>
> Tom
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:35 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
> hang s!) (V5.5)
>
>
> Well, give Perf Optimizer a shot and see what happens.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
> hang s!) (V5.5)
>
>
> Long ago we used it but have been fully migrated for a few years.  It was
> set to disabled in services (the msmail connector) and I don't recall
having
> clicked on it lately.
>
> I can view and change most of the properties in an existing mailbox EXCEPT
> for the email address tab.  If I try to add an additional address to an
> existing mailbox I get the same hang (admin program not responding and has
> hourglass) as when I try to add a new mailbox.
>
> Tom
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:14 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
> hang s!) (V5.5)
>
>
> Typically, you should run the Perm Optimizer after changes (Hard drive,
RAM
> etc, though no necessarily NICS...) It may help to run it here as well.
>
> Was the MSMAIL conn used at one time?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
> hang s!) (V5.5)
>
>
> Opening is OK.  The only things that hang the admin program that I have
> found so far is clicking on the IMS under connections (or also the no
longer
> in use msmail connector) and trying to add a mailbox.  I can navigate and
> open everything else I have tried including modifying an existing mailbox.
>
> Tom
> (starting to sweat...)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:40 PM
> To: Alverson, Thomas M.
> Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
> hang s!) (V5.5)
>
>
> So everything seems to work except opening the Admin program?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:25 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
> hang s!) (V5.5)
>
>
> It was hard-coded.  I wrote down the IP, netmask and gateway address and
> typed them into the new tcp/ip settings.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Leslie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:21 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
> (hang s!) (V5.5)
>
>
> Might not be related, but a changed NIC means a changed MAC.  Was the
server
> IP address reserved or static?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Alverson, Thomas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:52 AM
> Subject: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (hang
> s!) (V5.5)
>
>
> > I have an exchange 5.5 sp4 server that has been working fine for
> > years.
> On
> > Saturday I shut it down to replace the network card (3c905) with a new
> > one (intel gigabyte desktop T).  At the same time I also ran windows
> > update
> > (http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com) and applied the critical updates
> (that
> > were just for IE6 I believe).  After starting it up everything seemed
> > to work fine.
> >
> > This morning I tried to use the Exchange ADMIN program to view the IMS
> queue
> > and the admin program just hangs when I select connectio

RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!

[John Matteson]

Thongs used by Missy and Lori?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


He likes Thongs. Used thongs

-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


OK, so maybe Perf Optimizer really wasn't needed.  Maybe just another reboot
was all that was needed but it is working again.  I was just about ready to
give our new employee a hotmail address since I could not add him to
exchange.

One note:  When I ran perf optimizer it hung saying that it was stopping the
system attendant.  I checked services and all the exchange stuff had
stopped.  I killed perf opt. with taskman and started it again.  This time
it saw that everything was stopped and went right to the options screen.  It
did not recommend any changes, yet asked if it was OK to automatically move
the files (which I OK'ed).  After reboot I could once again open the IMS
properties and also add new mailboxes.

Thanks Andy!  I owe you (something?).

Tom

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Well, give Perf Optimizer a shot and see what happens. 


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Long ago we used it but have been fully migrated for a few years.  It was
set to disabled in services (the msmail connector) and I don't recall having
clicked on it lately.

I can view and change most of the properties in an existing mailbox EXCEPT
for the email address tab.  If I try to add an additional address to an
existing mailbox I get the same hang (admin program not responding and has
hourglass) as when I try to add a new mailbox.

Tom


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Typically, you should run the Perm Optimizer after changes (Hard drive, RAM
etc, though no necessarily NICS...) It may help to run it here as well.

Was the MSMAIL conn used at one time?


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Opening is OK.  The only things that hang the admin program that I have
found so far is clicking on the IMS under connections (or also the no longer
in use msmail connector) and trying to add a mailbox.  I can navigate and
open everything else I have tried including modifying an existing mailbox.

Tom
(starting to sweat...)

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:40 PM
To: Alverson, Thomas M.
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


So everything seems to work except opening the Admin program?



-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


It was hard-coded.  I wrote down the IP, netmask and gateway address and
typed them into the new tcp/ip settings.

-Original Message-
From: Richard Leslie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(hang s!) (V5.5)


Might not be related, but a changed NIC means a changed MAC.  Was the server
IP address reserved or static?

- Original Message -
From: "Alverson, Thomas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:52 AM
Subject: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (hang
s!) (V5.5)


> I have an exchange 5.5 sp4 server that has been working fine for 
> years.
On
> Saturday I shut it down to replace the network card (3c905) with a new 
> one (intel gigabyte desktop T).  At the same time I also ran windows 
> update
> (http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com) and applied the critical updates
(that
> wer

Hide User from GAL

[Hassan Mukhtar Ali]

Hello every one ,

We have Exchange Server 5.5 , we Successfully import users to our server
in a seperate container , the problem is how can i hide these remote users
from GAL and at the smae time keep them in their container so our user can
see them from outlook when our users want to send email to them...


Thanks for your help in advance


Hassan Mukhtar

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade failing

[Steve Van Eck]

Several months back, it appears that a developer (GRRR) installed Exchange 
2000 on a machine in the domain. Now that I am trying to upgrade our 
Exchange 5.5 site, I am having several problems.
When I try to create an intra-organizational ADC I receive this error

“Unable to create an intra-organizational Connection Agreement using the 
specified Exchange 5.5 Server. The Exchange 5.5 organization is different 
from the Exchange 2000 organization. Connection Agreements to different 
Exchange 5.5 organizations must be created as inter-organizational 
Connection Agreements. Select the inter-organizational Connection Agreement 
checkbox on the advanced page before continuing.
ID no:c103aa39
Microsoft Active Directory Connector Management”

I am able to create an inter-organizational ADC. Looking at the 
documentation, this may have been a mistake, as there is no way to undo 
this. But at this time, I can view the exchange attributes in “Active 
Directory Users and Computers”.

If I try to upgrade the 5.5 site, I receive this message.
“The component "Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services" 
cannot be assigned the action "Upgrade" because:
-You must use the same edition of Microsoft Exchange Setup (Enterprise or 
Server) as the existing Location.
-Setup has detected that the Exchange 5.5 Site that your server belongs to 
has not replicated to the Active Directory yet. You can either wait for 
replication to complete and try the upgrade again or upgrade a server from a 
site that has already been replicated to the AD.”
Probably because of the first Install of Exchange 2000 with the different 
name.

What are my options at this point?
1.  Rebuild Active Directory? I have a Windows NT 4.0 machine running as a 
BDC. I could take my Win2000 machines offline, promote the BDC and upgrade 
to 2000. Building a new schema.
2.  Install a child domain and install Exchange to that and migrate users?
3.  Build a new forest completely and migrate users.
4.  Edit AD by a export and Import?
5.  Install Exchange 2000 into the site created by the Developer (GRRR) and 
reattach users to the mailboxes?


Please feel free to shootdown any of these halfbaked ideas, or suggest a 
better course of action. I have to get IM up for the enterprise as soon as 
possible! (Says the COO)

Thanks!



_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Groups and such

[Morgan, Joshua]

How do you experienced Exchange Admins feel about nesting groups within
Exchange 5.5?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"One is glad to be of service "
--Robin Williams (Bicentennial Man)--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade failing

[Steve Van Eck]

Several months back, it appears that a developer (GRRR) installed Exchange 
2000 on a machine in the domain. Now that I am trying to upgrade our 
Exchange 5.5 site, I am having several problems.
When I try to create an intra-organizational ADC I receive this error

“Unable to create an intra-organizational Connection Agreement using the 
specified Exchange 5.5 Server. The Exchange 5.5 organization is different 
from the Exchange 2000 organization. Connection Agreements to different 
Exchange 5.5 organizations must be created as inter-organizational 
Connection Agreements. Select the inter-organizational Connection Agreement 
checkbox on the advanced page before continuing.
ID no:c103aa39
Microsoft Active Directory Connector Management”

I am able to create an inter-organizational ADC. Looking at the 
documentation, this may have been a mistake, as there is no way to undo 
this. But at this time, I can view the exchange attributes in “Active 
Directory Users and Computers”.

If I try to upgrade the 5.5 site, I receive this message.
“The component "Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services" 
cannot be assigned the action "Upgrade" because:
-You must use the same edition of Microsoft Exchange Setup (Enterprise or 
Server) as the existing Location.
-Setup has detected that the Exchange 5.5 Site that your server belongs to 
has not replicated to the Active Directory yet. You can either wait for 
replication to complete and try the upgrade again or upgrade a server from a 
site that has already been replicated to the AD.”
Probably because of the first Install of Exchange 2000 with the different 
name.

What are my options at this point?
1.  Rebuild Active Directory? I have a Windows NT 4.0 machine running as a 
BDC. I could take my Win2000 machines offline, promote the BDC and upgrade 
to 2000. Building a new schema.
2.  Install a child domain and install Exchange to that and migrate users?
3.  Build a new forest completely and migrate users.
4.  Edit AD by a export and Import?
5.  Install Exchange 2000 into the site created by the Developer (GRRR) and 
reattach users to the mailboxes?


Please feel free to shootdown any of these halfbaked ideas, or suggest a 
better course of action. I have to get IM up for the enterprise as soon as 
possible! (Says the COO)



_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Groups and such

[Morgan, Joshua]

How do you experienced Exchange Admins feel about nesting groups within
Exchange 5.5?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"One is glad to be of service "
--Robin Williams (Bicentennial Man)--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Move Server Exchange 2000

[jonathan]

I have an existing E2K server running SP2.  We just purchased a new
server.  I would like to move all information off the existing server and
put it on the new one.  I wuld like to keep the existing server as a file
server.  It is currently a Domain Controller.  The new sever would not be
a Domain Controller.  I would like to be able to place the new server
behind s firewall.  I have not found any documents on doing this except
for at www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_appxa.htm.  Is this the only way of
doing this?  Is there a better solution?  The 2 servers will of course
have different names.  Thanks in advance.

Jonathan

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag

[John Matteson]

Well, foo.. Here I thought it was shorthand for "Local User".

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones



-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag


http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/luser.html

-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag

Loosers?

 
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
  e-mail disclaimer  


-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 14:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag


The Bernouli Principal only applies when throwing the drives at Lusers.

-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag

Doesn't that screw up the bernouli effect?

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag


Actually I've already thougt of that since they are 1rpm drives, so
I
drilled a small hole and put in a pipe connected to a vaccum cleaner
works
great you guy's should give it a try, you be amazed at the amount of
crap
that builds on those drives.

 
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
  e-mail disclaimer  


-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 13:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag


The magnet won't get the metal flakes out of the carrier if you don't
disassemble it. I prefer taking the disks apart regularly to dust
(Pledge works best - it even leaves the server room smelling lemony
fresh). We have RAID5+1, so I don't even need to take the box offline to
do it.

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag


If you have drives that are faster than 7200rpm, tiny metal particles
will
collect on your disks because they spin so fast.  You should clean these
out
by waving a powerful magnet over your disk drives.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag


I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that
should
ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc.
Everything
I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these
utilities unless ther's a problem.  Anyone recommend otherwise.

Thanks for clearing the up the white space 

 
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
  e-mail disclaimer  


-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag


White space = amount of unused space in your store, after
defragmentation
Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive

Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to
the
limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server
grows in number.  As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange
defrags
your Store, you will notice additional "white space."  Don't worry about
it.
Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server.

Jim Blunt

-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag


After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I
increase
the store size?

 
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadwa

RE: Tracking an Email Message

[John Matteson]

Never. They, like cockroaches, reproduce too quickly to get them all.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones



-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


Next Thursday if that's ok with everyone else. How long do you think it
will take for us to finish them off?
-Chris

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dillon, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


What's clearly criminal is the length of Damien's disclaimer.  The email
thingie is always covered in the company policy manual, the receipt of
which you attest under threat of non-employment. So when DO we start
shooting the lawyers?

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


AFAIK, as long as the company has a published and communicated policy
that says something like "we can look at your mail anytime we want, and
by agreeing to work here you also agree to this" there is nothing
criminal about it.  Besides, if it was a criminal offense as you've
suggested the vendors that supply content filtering software would go
out of business since the usage of their products would become illegal.

But, this question is best left to the company lawyers.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


Were do you get the information that it is criminal?  I certainly don't
agree with it, but my understanding is that current case law (at least
in my
state) actually supports that if it is a business account the business
is who owns it.

-Original Message-
From: Damien D Keffyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Tracking an Email Message


I agree this could turn nasty on you, dont do it, make sure you have it 
in writing and signed by the management first before you even attempt
this. Trust me when it goes down and you dont have it in writing they
will 
take you with them. After all you are the tech that "advised" them this 
was possible, at least that is the way it will sound when they get 
dragged through court.

It is a criminal offence to read someone elses email without thier 
consent, or a warrant.

-- 
Regards

*/Damien D Keffyn/*
Senior I.T. Administrator
(Australia)

*Ph:*61 3 9334 5010
*Ph:*61 4 3824 3897
*Fax:   *61 3 9334 5875
*Mobile:*0438 243 897
*Email: *[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*Level 1, 1 Apac Drive 
(Aviation House)
Melbourne International Airport
Tullamarine, 3043, Victoria*

DISCLAIMER 
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged and is intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed. If the message is received and you are
not the addressee, you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this e-mail.  Any views expressed in this message are those
of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states
them to be the views of the John Menzies plc group of companies All
messages are checked for viruses, but we strongly recommend that you
check for viruses using your own virus scanner. No member of the John
Menzies plc group of companies will take responsibility for any damage
caused as a result of virus infection. At present the integrity of
e-mail across the Internet cannot be guaranteed. Therefore no member of
the John Menzies plc group of companies will accept liability for any
claims arising as a result of the use of this medium for transmissions
by or any member of the John Menzies plc group of companies



Louis Joyce wrote:

>You might want to check with your legal department before continuing 
>down this alley.
>
>Regards
>
>Mr Louis Joyce
>Data Support Analyst
>BT Ignite eSolutions
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Exchange Newsgroups [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: 13 March 2002 00:10
>>To:   Exchange Discussions
>>Subject:  Tracking an Email Message
>>
>>I have been asked by the management to have a copy of a users 
>>incomming and outgoing emails to be reviewed by them.  I know how to 
>>setup the incomming by forwarding but how do you do that for outgoing?
>>Also this user is in another office who uses POP3 to retrieve their 
>>emails.
>>
>>We are using Exchange 2000 SP2.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/

RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!

[Martin Blackstone]

He likes Thongs. Used thongs

-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


OK, so maybe Perf Optimizer really wasn't needed.  Maybe just another reboot
was all that was needed but it is working again.  I was just about ready to
give our new employee a hotmail address since I could not add him to
exchange.

One note:  When I ran perf optimizer it hung saying that it was stopping the
system attendant.  I checked services and all the exchange stuff had
stopped.  I killed perf opt. with taskman and started it again.  This time
it saw that everything was stopped and went right to the options screen.  It
did not recommend any changes, yet asked if it was OK to automatically move
the files (which I OK'ed).  After reboot I could once again open the IMS
properties and also add new mailboxes.

Thanks Andy!  I owe you (something?).

Tom

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Well, give Perf Optimizer a shot and see what happens. 


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Long ago we used it but have been fully migrated for a few years.  It was
set to disabled in services (the msmail connector) and I don't recall having
clicked on it lately.

I can view and change most of the properties in an existing mailbox EXCEPT
for the email address tab.  If I try to add an additional address to an
existing mailbox I get the same hang (admin program not responding and has
hourglass) as when I try to add a new mailbox.

Tom


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Typically, you should run the Perm Optimizer after changes (Hard drive, RAM
etc, though no necessarily NICS...) It may help to run it here as well.

Was the MSMAIL conn used at one time?


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Opening is OK.  The only things that hang the admin program that I have
found so far is clicking on the IMS under connections (or also the no longer
in use msmail connector) and trying to add a mailbox.  I can navigate and
open everything else I have tried including modifying an existing mailbox.

Tom
(starting to sweat...)

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:40 PM
To: Alverson, Thomas M.
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


So everything seems to work except opening the Admin program?



-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


It was hard-coded.  I wrote down the IP, netmask and gateway address and
typed them into the new tcp/ip settings.

-Original Message-
From: Richard Leslie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(hang s!) (V5.5)


Might not be related, but a changed NIC means a changed MAC.  Was the server
IP address reserved or static?

- Original Message -
From: "Alverson, Thomas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:52 AM
Subject: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (hang
s!) (V5.5)


> I have an exchange 5.5 sp4 server that has been working fine for 
> years.
On
> Saturday I shut it down to replace the network card (3c905) with a new 
> one (intel gigabyte desktop T).  At the same time I also ran windows 
> update
> (http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com) and applied the critical updates
(that
> were just for IE6 I believe).  After starting it up everything seemed 
> to work fine.
>
> This morning I tried to use the Exchange ADMIN program to view the IMS
queue
> and the admin program just hangs when I select connections/ims.  It 
> must
be
> killed with task manager.  I tried the admin program both on the 
> server
and
> also on a separate client machine which used to work.  Both hang the 
> admin program when IMS is selected.  Every thing else in the admin 
> program
appea

RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!

[Blunt, James H (Jim)]

Buy him a new thong.  From what I hear thru the grapevine, his old needs
washing and keeps getting caught in the servers.  ;0)

Jim Blunt

-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!


OK, so maybe Perf Optimizer really wasn't needed.  Maybe just another reboot
was all that was needed but it is working again.  I was just about ready to
give our new employee a hotmail address since I could not add him to
exchange.

One note:  When I ran perf optimizer it hung saying that it was stopping the
system attendant.  I checked services and all the exchange stuff had
stopped.  I killed perf opt. with taskman and started it again.  This time
it saw that everything was stopped and went right to the options screen.  It
did not recommend any changes, yet asked if it was OK to automatically move
the files (which I OK'ed).  After reboot I could once again open the IMS
properties and also add new mailboxes.

Thanks Andy!  I owe you (something?).

Tom

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Well, give Perf Optimizer a shot and see what happens. 


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Long ago we used it but have been fully migrated for a few years.  It was
set to disabled in services (the msmail connector) and I don't recall having
clicked on it lately.

I can view and change most of the properties in an existing mailbox EXCEPT
for the email address tab.  If I try to add an additional address to an
existing mailbox I get the same hang (admin program not responding and has
hourglass) as when I try to add a new mailbox.

Tom


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Typically, you should run the Perm Optimizer after changes (Hard drive, RAM
etc, though no necessarily NICS...) It may help to run it here as well.

Was the MSMAIL conn used at one time?


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Opening is OK.  The only things that hang the admin program that I have
found so far is clicking on the IMS under connections (or also the no longer
in use msmail connector) and trying to add a mailbox.  I can navigate and
open everything else I have tried including modifying an existing mailbox.

Tom
(starting to sweat...)

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:40 PM
To: Alverson, Thomas M.
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


So everything seems to work except opening the Admin program?



-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


It was hard-coded.  I wrote down the IP, netmask and gateway address and
typed them into the new tcp/ip settings.

-Original Message-
From: Richard Leslie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(hang s!) (V5.5)


Might not be related, but a changed NIC means a changed MAC.  Was the server
IP address reserved or static?

- Original Message -
From: "Alverson, Thomas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:52 AM
Subject: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (hang
s!) (V5.5)


> I have an exchange 5.5 sp4 server that has been working fine for
> years.
On
> Saturday I shut it down to replace the network card (3c905) with a new
> one (intel gigabyte desktop T).  At the same time I also ran windows 
> update
> (http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com) and applied the critical updates
(that
> were just for IE6 I believe).  After starting it up everything seemed
> to work fine.
>
> This morning I tried to use the Exchange ADMIN program to view the IMS
queue
> and the admin program just hangs when I select connections/ims.  It
> must
be
> killed with task manager.  I tried the admin program both on the
> server
and
> also on a separate client machine which used to wor

Re: promoting E2K to a DC

[John Q Jr.]

You know the location & or what CD this is located on?

- Original Message - 
From: "Stidley, Joel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:48 PM
Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC


How is your network setup?  Is your Exchange server behind a firewall or
VPN?  Do you have a GC close to the clients?  Have you done a netmon
trace to see at what point the problem is occurring?

Joel

-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC

I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give "Requesting data from
Exchange
server" errors to users.
All users are using OLK2002. I have tried everything I know. To no
avail.
I have also tried to reset the OLK clients, still an issues.
It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine and then not,
then a nother user will expirence the same isse.
I would think it's a load issue, but w/ only 25 users on this ssytem,
there
is no way. Even checked w Prof monitor.
1GB mem, dual 550 Procs, 36 GB of free space
So I am thinking it's an issue with E2K DC communication.
So my fix is to promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it.
Any reason I should not?

Thank You,
 - John Q Jr.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Changed NIC - Andy David is GODLIKE!

[Alverson, Thomas M.]

OK, so maybe Perf Optimizer really wasn't needed.  Maybe just another reboot
was all that was needed but it is working again.  I was just about ready to
give our new employee a hotmail address since I could not add him to
exchange.

One note:  When I ran perf optimizer it hung saying that it was stopping the
system attendant.  I checked services and all the exchange stuff had
stopped.  I killed perf opt. with taskman and started it again.  This time
it saw that everything was stopped and went right to the options screen.  It
did not recommend any changes, yet asked if it was OK to automatically move
the files (which I OK'ed).  After reboot I could once again open the IMS
properties and also add new mailboxes.

Thanks Andy!  I owe you (something?).

Tom

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Well, give Perf Optimizer a shot and see what happens. 


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Long ago we used it but have been fully migrated for a few years.  It was
set to disabled in services (the msmail connector) and I don't recall having
clicked on it lately.

I can view and change most of the properties in an existing mailbox EXCEPT
for the email address tab.  If I try to add an additional address to an
existing mailbox I get the same hang (admin program not responding and has
hourglass) as when I try to add a new mailbox.

Tom


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Typically, you should run the Perm Optimizer after changes (Hard drive, RAM
etc, though no necessarily NICS...) It may help to run it here as well.

Was the MSMAIL conn used at one time?


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


Opening is OK.  The only things that hang the admin program that I have
found so far is clicking on the IMS under connections (or also the no longer
in use msmail connector) and trying to add a mailbox.  I can navigate and
open everything else I have tried including modifying an existing mailbox.

Tom
(starting to sweat...)

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:40 PM
To: Alverson, Thomas M.
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


So everything seems to work except opening the Admin program?



-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (
hang s!) (V5.5)


It was hard-coded.  I wrote down the IP, netmask and gateway address and
typed them into the new tcp/ip settings.

-Original Message-
From: Richard Leslie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program
(hang s!) (V5.5)


Might not be related, but a changed NIC means a changed MAC.  Was the server
IP address reserved or static?

- Original Message -
From: "Alverson, Thomas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:52 AM
Subject: Changed NIC - now can't control IMS via Exch. Admin program (hang
s!) (V5.5)


> I have an exchange 5.5 sp4 server that has been working fine for
> years.
On
> Saturday I shut it down to replace the network card (3c905) with a new
> one (intel gigabyte desktop T).  At the same time I also ran windows 
> update
> (http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com) and applied the critical updates
(that
> were just for IE6 I believe).  After starting it up everything seemed
> to work fine.
>
> This morning I tried to use the Exchange ADMIN program to view the IMS
queue
> and the admin program just hangs when I select connections/ims.  It
> must
be
> killed with task manager.  I tried the admin program both on the
> server
and
> also on a separate client machine which used to work.  Both hang the
> admin program when IMS is selected.  Every thing else in the admin 
> program
appears
> to work fine except the MSMAIL connector (which we no longer use) also
> hangs.  All the other functions seem to work in the admin program.
>
> I tried stopping and restarting the IMS in services but that did not
> help. I may try rebooting the server 

RE: Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server

[Haris Dechapunya]

We are in the early stage of the investigation.
We are also looking at Polycom, Cisco IP videoconferencing, VCON.
Our requirements are:
- IP (both LAN and the Internet)
- Desktop (one-to-many) and Conference room (many-to-many)

Cheers,
Haris

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, 19 March 2002 4:00 p.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server


We are using:
http://www.fvc.com/products/ctmexchange.htm

What other products have you considered?


William

-Original Message-
From: Haris Dechapunya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server


Hi,

We are investigating Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server.
Have anybody had experiences with this product?
Your comment will be much appreciated.
 
Haris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2000 Deferred Delivery gives incorrect Sent Date

[Ray Beckwith]

It reproduces consistently on at least 3 systems. All latest SP. If no one else has an 
idea, I'll have to contact PSS.


Thanks...Ray

Quote of the day:
There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. 
-- Werner Karl Heisenberg  




-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Deferred Delivery gives incorrect Sent Date


If you can reproduce it, it sounds like a bug. If you're running the latest
SP on Exchange, I'd call PSS.


Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP  512.652.4500 x244
Senior Sales Engineer   MessageOne


> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:28 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange 2000 Deferred Delivery gives incorrect Sent Date
> 
> 
> I have another issue that appears to be related to our 
> upgrade from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 that I could use 
> your input on. Since the upgrade, when senders use either of 
> the deferred delivery options (view, options and set "do not 
> deliver before [date]" or File, Properties, Send Options, 
> Microsoft Exchange Server and set the "Send this item" delay 
> time) the item is sent with the Send Date and Received Date 
> equal to the date it was originally sent. In Exchange 5.5, 
> the Received Date was set to the deferral date.
> 
> This is causing issues with the deferred messages and users 
> who sort their inboxes by the received date. Any suggestions 
> about this would be greatly appreciated.
> 
>  
> Thanks...
> Ray Beckwith
> Network Administrator
> California Credit Union League
> Information Technology
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>   www.ccul.org 

 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2000 Deferred Delivery gives incorrect Sent Date

[Shields, Anthony]

I too am experiencing this problem.  Did not know it was a E2k, as I hadn't used 
deferred in 5.5.

Interesting.



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Deferred Delivery gives incorrect Sent Date


If you can reproduce it, it sounds like a bug. If you're running the latest SP on 
Exchange, I'd call PSS.


Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP  512.652.4500 x244
Senior Sales Engineer   MessageOne


> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:28 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange 2000 Deferred Delivery gives incorrect Sent Date
> 
> 
> I have another issue that appears to be related to our
> upgrade from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 that I could use 
> your input on. Since the upgrade, when senders use either of 
> the deferred delivery options (view, options and set "do not 
> deliver before [date]" or File, Properties, Send Options, 
> Microsoft Exchange Server and set the "Send this item" delay 
> time) the item is sent with the Send Date and Received Date 
> equal to the date it was originally sent. In Exchange 5.5, 
> the Received Date was set to the deferral date.
> 
> This is causing issues with the deferred messages and users
> who sort their inboxes by the received date. Any suggestions 
> about this would be greatly appreciated.
> 
>  
> Thanks...
> Ray Beckwith
> Network Administrator
> California Credit Union League
> Information Technology
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   www.ccul.org 

 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2000 Deferred Delivery gives incorrect Sent Date

[Chris Scharff]

If you can reproduce it, it sounds like a bug. If you're running the latest
SP on Exchange, I'd call PSS.


Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP  512.652.4500 x244
Senior Sales Engineer   MessageOne


> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:28 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange 2000 Deferred Delivery gives incorrect Sent Date
> 
> 
> I have another issue that appears to be related to our 
> upgrade from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 that I could use 
> your input on. Since the upgrade, when senders use either of 
> the deferred delivery options (view, options and set "do not 
> deliver before [date]" or File, Properties, Send Options, 
> Microsoft Exchange Server and set the "Send this item" delay 
> time) the item is sent with the Send Date and Received Date 
> equal to the date it was originally sent. In Exchange 5.5, 
> the Received Date was set to the deferral date.
> 
> This is causing issues with the deferred messages and users 
> who sort their inboxes by the received date. Any suggestions 
> about this would be greatly appreciated.
> 
>  
> Thanks...
> Ray Beckwith
> Network Administrator
> California Credit Union League
> Information Technology
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>   www.ccul.org 

 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Tracking an Email Message

[Christopher Hummert]

Next Thursday if that's ok with everyone else. How long do you think it
will take for us to finish them off?
-Chris

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dillon, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


What's clearly criminal is the length of Damien's disclaimer.  The email
thingie is always covered in the company policy manual, the receipt of
which you attest under threat of non-employment. So when DO we start
shooting the lawyers?

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


AFAIK, as long as the company has a published and communicated policy
that says something like "we can look at your mail anytime we want, and
by agreeing to work here you also agree to this" there is nothing
criminal about it.  Besides, if it was a criminal offense as you've
suggested the vendors that supply content filtering software would go
out of business since the usage of their products would become illegal.

But, this question is best left to the company lawyers.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


Were do you get the information that it is criminal?  I certainly don't
agree with it, but my understanding is that current case law (at least
in my
state) actually supports that if it is a business account the business
is who owns it.

-Original Message-
From: Damien D Keffyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Tracking an Email Message


I agree this could turn nasty on you, dont do it, make sure you have it 
in writing and signed by the management first before you even attempt
this. Trust me when it goes down and you dont have it in writing they
will 
take you with them. After all you are the tech that "advised" them this 
was possible, at least that is the way it will sound when they get 
dragged through court.

It is a criminal offence to read someone elses email without thier 
consent, or a warrant.

-- 
Regards

*/Damien D Keffyn/*
Senior I.T. Administrator
(Australia)

*Ph:*61 3 9334 5010
*Ph:*61 4 3824 3897
*Fax:   *61 3 9334 5875
*Mobile:*0438 243 897
*Email: *[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*Level 1, 1 Apac Drive 
(Aviation House)
Melbourne International Airport
Tullamarine, 3043, Victoria*

DISCLAIMER 
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged and is intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed. If the message is received and you are
not the addressee, you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this e-mail.  Any views expressed in this message are those
of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states
them to be the views of the John Menzies plc group of companies All
messages are checked for viruses, but we strongly recommend that you
check for viruses using your own virus scanner. No member of the John
Menzies plc group of companies will take responsibility for any damage
caused as a result of virus infection. At present the integrity of
e-mail across the Internet cannot be guaranteed. Therefore no member of
the John Menzies plc group of companies will accept liability for any
claims arising as a result of the use of this medium for transmissions
by or any member of the John Menzies plc group of companies



Louis Joyce wrote:

>You might want to check with your legal department before continuing 
>down this alley.
>
>Regards
>
>Mr Louis Joyce
>Data Support Analyst
>BT Ignite eSolutions
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Exchange Newsgroups [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: 13 March 2002 00:10
>>To:   Exchange Discussions
>>Subject:  Tracking an Email Message
>>
>>I have been asked by the management to have a copy of a users 
>>incomming and outgoing emails to be reviewed by them.  I know how to 
>>setup the incomming by forwarding but how do you do that for outgoing?
>>Also this user is in another office who uses POP3 to retrieve their 
>>emails.
>>
>>We are using Exchange 2000 SP2.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Digital Signatures and Custom Forms

[Soysal, Serdar]

I would search slipstick.com for this.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Digital Signatures and Custom Forms


Does anyone know any way to capture that information and write it on the
form?  Or is that even possible?

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Digital Signatures and Custom Forms


A custom form is an ordinary message.  So I assume the answer would be no.
When the user forwards/copies/replies to the message, you essentially create
a new message and copy all the data over.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Digital Signatures and Custom Forms


Is anyone using digital signatures with custom forms?  We've been asked to
implement a form for an approval process that must route to several levels
of management within the company.  We want to use digital signatures to make
this a "legal" document.  Right now, I have the form made (first draft) and
can route it to different people, but it only seems to keep track of the
signature of the last person to send the form.  Is there a way to track
multiple signatures on a custom form?  We are running E2K Sp1.  The
certificates were issued internally by our CA.

Thanks.
Tara


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Tracking an Email Message

[Soysal, Serdar]

LOL.  You have to love the amount of pressure it would put on a person that
would take it seriously.  In the disclaimer it says, and I quote, "If the
message is received and you are not the addressee, you must not use,
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail.".  But in order to
get to the disclaimer, you open and read the message.  So essentially you've
"used" it.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


What's clearly criminal is the length of Damien's disclaimer.  The email
thingie is always covered in the company policy manual, the receipt of which
you attest under threat of non-employment. So when DO we start shooting the
lawyers?

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


AFAIK, as long as the company has a published and communicated policy that
says something like "we can look at your mail anytime we want, and by
agreeing to work here you also agree to this" there is nothing criminal
about it.  Besides, if it was a criminal offense as you've suggested the
vendors that supply content filtering software would go out of business
since the usage of their products would become illegal.

But, this question is best left to the company lawyers.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


Were do you get the information that it is criminal?  I certainly don't
agree with it, but my understanding is that current case law (at least in my
state) actually supports that if it is a business account the business is
who owns it.

-Original Message-
From: Damien D Keffyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Tracking an Email Message


I agree this could turn nasty on you, dont do it, make sure you have it 
in writing and signed by the management first before you even attempt this.
Trust me when it goes down and you dont have it in writing they will 
take you with them. After all you are the tech that "advised" them this 
was possible, at least that is the way it will sound when they get 
dragged through court.

It is a criminal offence to read someone elses email without thier 
consent, or a warrant.

-- 
Regards

*/Damien D Keffyn/*
Senior I.T. Administrator
(Australia)

*Ph:*61 3 9334 5010
*Ph:*61 4 3824 3897
*Fax:   *61 3 9334 5875
*Mobile:*0438 243 897
*Email: *[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*Level 1, 1 Apac Drive 
(Aviation House)
Melbourne International Airport
Tullamarine, 3043, Victoria*

DISCLAIMER 
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged
and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it
is addressed. If the message is received and you are not the addressee, you
must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the sender specifically states them to be the views of the John
Menzies plc group of companies All messages are checked for viruses, but we
strongly recommend that you check for viruses using your own virus scanner.
No member of the John Menzies plc group of companies will take
responsibility for any damage caused as a result of virus infection. At
present the integrity of e-mail across the Internet cannot be guaranteed.
Therefore no member of the John Menzies plc group of companies will accept
liability for any claims arising as a result of the use of this medium for
transmissions by or any member of the John Menzies plc group of companies



Louis Joyce wrote:

>You might want to check with your legal department before continuing 
>down this alley.
>
>Regards
>
>Mr Louis Joyce
>Data Support Analyst
>BT Ignite eSolutions
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Exchange Newsgroups [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: 13 March 2002 00:10
>>To:   Exchange Discussions
>>Subject:  Tracking an Email Message
>>
>>I have been asked by the management to have a copy of a users 
>>incomming and outgoing emails to be reviewed by them.  I know how to 
>>setup the incomming by forwarding but how do you do that for outgoing?
>>Also this user is in another office who uses POP3 to retrieve their 
>>emails.
>>
>>We are using Exchange 2000 SP2.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   

RE: "Q" article confirmation

[Finch Brett]

 Yeah but I'm fed up with calling PSS, that's why I thought I could get a
easy answer here. I thought surely someone has made this registry hack work.

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: "Q" article confirmation


The article says it's fixed in the next sp.  Since there was no sp listed at
the time of the article, and you're on sp4, they seem to think you shouldn't
have the problem.  

-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: "Q" article confirmation


 Oh sorry, I had posted on the weekend.
Exchange 5.5 SPK4 on NT4 SPK6a, my thinking is 
a typo in the article as it doesn't appear to 
work in it's present form.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: "Q" article confirmation


Version and SP? [1]

[1] Good Gawd, I sound like Precht




-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: "Q" article confirmation


 I've made a change to the registry as outlined in this "Q" article. It does
not appear to work at all.  If someone has made the same registry, can you
confirm that this works and it is the correct registry entry (not a typo).
http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182010


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Digital Signatures and Custom Forms

[Stephens, Tara]

Does anyone know any way to capture that information and write it on the
form?  Or is that even possible?

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Digital Signatures and Custom Forms


A custom form is an ordinary message.  So I assume the answer would be
no. When the user forwards/copies/replies to the message, you
essentially create a new message and copy all the data over.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Digital Signatures and Custom Forms


Is anyone using digital signatures with custom forms?  We've been asked
to implement a form for an approval process that must route to several
levels of management within the company.  We want to use digital
signatures to make this a "legal" document.  Right now, I have the form
made (first draft) and can route it to different people, but it only
seems to keep track of the signature of the last person to send the
form.  Is there a way to track multiple signatures on a custom form?  We
are running E2K Sp1.  The certificates were issued internally by our CA.

Thanks.
Tara


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Digital Signatures and Custom Forms

[Soysal, Serdar]

A custom form is an ordinary message.  So I assume the answer would be no.
When the user forwards/copies/replies to the message, you essentially create
a new message and copy all the data over.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Digital Signatures and Custom Forms


Is anyone using digital signatures with custom forms?  We've been asked to
implement a form for an approval process that must route to several levels
of management within the company.  We want to use digital signatures to make
this a "legal" document.  Right now, I have the form made (first draft) and
can route it to different people, but it only seems to keep track of the
signature of the last person to send the form.  Is there a way to track
multiple signatures on a custom form?  We are running E2K Sp1.  The
certificates were issued internally by our CA.

Thanks.
Tara


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Tracking an Email Message

[Dillon, Jeff]

What's clearly criminal is the length of Damien's disclaimer.  The email
thingie is always covered in the company policy manual, the receipt of which
you attest under threat of non-employment.
So when DO we start shooting the lawyers?

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


AFAIK, as long as the company has a published and communicated policy that
says something like "we can look at your mail anytime we want, and by
agreeing to work here you also agree to this" there is nothing criminal
about it.  Besides, if it was a criminal offense as you've suggested the
vendors that supply content filtering software would go out of business
since the usage of their products would become illegal.

But, this question is best left to the company lawyers.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


Were do you get the information that it is criminal?  I certainly don't
agree with it, but my understanding is that current case law (at least in my
state) actually supports that if it is a business account the business is
who owns it.

-Original Message-
From: Damien D Keffyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Tracking an Email Message


I agree this could turn nasty on you, dont do it, make sure you have it 
in writing and signed by the management first before you even attempt this.
Trust me when it goes down and you dont have it in writing they will 
take you with them. After all you are the tech that "advised" them this 
was possible, at least that is the way it will sound when they get 
dragged through court.

It is a criminal offence to read someone elses email without thier 
consent, or a warrant.

-- 
Regards

*/Damien D Keffyn/*
Senior I.T. Administrator
(Australia)

*Ph:*61 3 9334 5010
*Ph:*61 4 3824 3897
*Fax:   *61 3 9334 5875
*Mobile:*0438 243 897
*Email: *[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*Level 1, 1 Apac Drive 
(Aviation House)
Melbourne International Airport
Tullamarine, 3043, Victoria*

DISCLAIMER 
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged
and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it
is addressed. If the message is received and you are not the addressee, you
must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the sender specifically states them to be the views of the John
Menzies plc group of companies All messages are checked for viruses, but we
strongly recommend that you check for viruses using your own virus scanner.
No member of the John Menzies plc group of companies will take
responsibility for any damage caused as a result of virus infection. At
present the integrity of e-mail across the Internet cannot be guaranteed.
Therefore no member of the John Menzies plc group of companies will accept
liability for any claims arising as a result of the use of this medium for
transmissions by or any member of the John Menzies plc group of companies



Louis Joyce wrote:

>You might want to check with your legal department before continuing
>down this alley.
>
>Regards
>
>Mr Louis Joyce
>Data Support Analyst
>BT Ignite eSolutions
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Exchange Newsgroups [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: 13 March 2002 00:10
>>To:   Exchange Discussions
>>Subject:  Tracking an Email Message
>>
>>I have been asked by the management to have a copy of a users
>>incomming and outgoing emails to be reviewed by them.  I know how to 
>>setup the incomming by forwarding but how do you do that for outgoing?  
>>Also this user is in another office who uses POP3 to retrieve their 
>>emails.
>>
>>We are using Exchange 2000 SP2.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: "Q" article confirmation

[Hunter, Lori]

The article says it's fixed in the next sp.  Since there was no sp listed at
the time of the article, and you're on sp4, they seem to think you shouldn't
have the problem.  

-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: "Q" article confirmation


 Oh sorry, I had posted on the weekend.
Exchange 5.5 SPK4 on NT4 SPK6a, my thinking is 
a typo in the article as it doesn't appear to 
work in it's present form.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: "Q" article confirmation


Version and SP? [1]

[1] Good Gawd, I sound like Precht




-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: "Q" article confirmation


 I've made a change to the registry as outlined in this "Q" article. It does
not appear to work at all.  If someone has made the same registry, can you
confirm that this works and it is the correct registry entry (not a typo).
http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182010


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: promoting E2K to a DC

[Webb, Andy]

all that will do is /increase/ the load.  before doing the promotion, why
not call PSS?  Could be a whole lot cheaper.  Or look to the network layer
of the stack - do some packet captures, look at net bottlenecks, test your
switch/hub, verify hard set duplex settings, etc.

===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED]  www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc.   Austin, TX512-322-0071
=== 

-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC


I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give "Requesting data from Exchange
server" errors to users. All users are using OLK2002. I have tried
everything I know. To no avail. I have also tried to reset the OLK clients,
still an issues. It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine
and then not, then a nother user will expirence the same isse. I would think
it's a load issue, but w/ only 25 users on this ssytem, there is no way.
Even checked w Prof monitor. 1GB mem, dual 550 Procs, 36 GB of free space So
I am thinking it's an issue with E2K DC communication. So my fix is to
promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it. Any reason I should not?

Thank You,
 - John Q Jr.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: promoting E2K to a DC

[Stidley, Joel]

How is your network setup?  Is your Exchange server behind a firewall or
VPN?  Do you have a GC close to the clients?  Have you done a netmon
trace to see at what point the problem is occurring?

Joel

-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC

I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give "Requesting data from
Exchange
server" errors to users.
All users are using OLK2002. I have tried everything I know. To no
avail.
I have also tried to reset the OLK clients, still an issues.
It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine and then not,
then a nother user will expirence the same isse.
I would think it's a load issue, but w/ only 25 users on this ssytem,
there
is no way. Even checked w Prof monitor.
1GB mem, dual 550 Procs, 36 GB of free space
So I am thinking it's an issue with E2K DC communication.
So my fix is to promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it.
Any reason I should not?

Thank You,
 - John Q Jr.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Digital Signatures and Custom Forms

[Stephens, Tara]

Is anyone using digital signatures with custom forms?  We've been asked
to implement a form for an approval process that must route to several
levels of management within the company.  We want to use digital
signatures to make this a "legal" document.  Right now, I have the form
made (first draft) and can route it to different people, but it only
seems to keep track of the signature of the last person to send the
form.  Is there a way to track multiple signatures on a custom form?  We
are running E2K Sp1.  The certificates were issued internally by our CA.

Thanks.
Tara


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: promoting E2K to a DC

[John Q Jr.]

I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give "Requesting data from Exchange
server" errors to users.
All users are using OLK2002. I have tried everything I know. To no avail.
I have also tried to reset the OLK clients, still an issues.
It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine and then not,
then a nother user will expirence the same isse.
I would think it's a load issue, but w/ only 25 users on this ssytem, there
is no way. Even checked w Prof monitor.
1GB mem, dual 550 Procs, 36 GB of free space
So I am thinking it's an issue with E2K DC communication.
So my fix is to promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it.
Any reason I should not?

Thank You,
 - John Q Jr.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Tracking an Email Message

[Soysal, Serdar]

AFAIK, as long as the company has a published and communicated policy that
says something like "we can look at your mail anytime we want, and by
agreeing to work here you also agree to this" there is nothing criminal
about it.  Besides, if it was a criminal offense as you've suggested the
vendors that supply content filtering software would go out of business
since the usage of their products would become illegal.

But, this question is best left to the company lawyers.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message


Were do you get the information that it is criminal?  I certainly don't
agree with it, but my understanding is that current case law (at least in my
state) actually supports that if it is a business account the business is
who owns it.

-Original Message-
From: Damien D Keffyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Tracking an Email Message


I agree this could turn nasty on you, dont do it, make sure you have it 
in writing and signed by the management first before you even attempt this.
Trust me when it goes down and you dont have it in writing they will 
take you with them. After all you are the tech that "advised" them this 
was possible, at least that is the way it will sound when they get 
dragged through court.

It is a criminal offence to read someone elses email without thier 
consent, or a warrant.

-- 
Regards

*/Damien D Keffyn/*
Senior I.T. Administrator
(Australia)

*Ph:*61 3 9334 5010
*Ph:*61 4 3824 3897
*Fax:   *61 3 9334 5875
*Mobile:*0438 243 897
*Email: *[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*Level 1, 1 Apac Drive 
(Aviation House)
Melbourne International Airport
Tullamarine, 3043, Victoria*

DISCLAIMER 
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged
and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it
is addressed. If the message is received and you are not the addressee, you
must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the sender specifically states them to be the views of the John
Menzies plc group of companies All messages are checked for viruses, but we
strongly recommend that you check for viruses using your own virus scanner.
No member of the John Menzies plc group of companies will take
responsibility for any damage caused as a result of virus infection. At
present the integrity of e-mail across the Internet cannot be guaranteed.
Therefore no member of the John Menzies plc group of companies will accept
liability for any claims arising as a result of the use of this medium for
transmissions by or any member of the John Menzies plc group of companies



Louis Joyce wrote:

>You might want to check with your legal department before continuing
>down this alley.
>
>Regards
>
>Mr Louis Joyce
>Data Support Analyst
>BT Ignite eSolutions
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Exchange Newsgroups [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: 13 March 2002 00:10
>>To:   Exchange Discussions
>>Subject:  Tracking an Email Message
>>
>>I have been asked by the management to have a copy of a users
>>incomming and outgoing emails to be reviewed by them.  I know how to 
>>setup the incomming by forwarding but how do you do that for outgoing?  
>>Also this user is in another office who uses POP3 to retrieve their 
>>emails.
>>
>>We are using Exchange 2000 SP2.
>>
>>
>>Saul
>>
>>
>>_
>>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://ww

RE: "Q" article confirmation

[Finch Brett]

 Oh sorry, I had posted on the weekend.
Exchange 5.5 SPK4 on NT4 SPK6a, my thinking is 
a typo in the article as it doesn't appear to 
work in it's present form.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: "Q" article confirmation


Version and SP? [1]

[1] Good Gawd, I sound like Precht




-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: "Q" article confirmation


 I've made a change to the registry as outlined in this "Q" article. It does
not appear to work at all.  If someone has made the same registry, can you
confirm that this works and it is the correct registry entry (not a typo).
http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182010


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: "Q" article confirmation

[Andy David]

Version and SP? [1]

[1] Good Gawd, I sound like Precht




-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: "Q" article confirmation


 I've made a change to the registry as outlined in this "Q" article. It
does not appear to work at all.
 If someone has made the same registry, can you confirm that this works
and it is the correct registry entry (not a typo).
 http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182010


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange 2000 Deferred Delivery gives incorrect Sent Date

[Ray Beckwith]

I have another issue that appears to be related to our upgrade from Exchange 5.5 to 
Exchange 2000 that I could use your input on. Since the upgrade, when senders use 
either of the deferred delivery options (view, options and set "do not deliver before 
[date]" or File, Properties, Send Options, Microsoft Exchange Server and set the "Send 
this item" delay time) the item is sent with the Send Date and Received Date equal to 
the date it was originally sent. In Exchange 5.5, the Received Date was set to the 
deferral date.

This is causing issues with the deferred messages and users who sort their inboxes by 
the received date. Any suggestions about this would be greatly appreciated.

 
Thanks...
Ray Beckwith
Network Administrator
California Credit Union League
Information Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.ccul.org 

 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Q" article confirmation

[Finch Brett]

 I've made a change to the registry as outlined in this "Q" article. It
does not appear to work at all.
 If someone has made the same registry, can you confirm that this works
and it is the correct registry entry (not a typo).
 http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182010


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Rules Client or Server??

[Soysal, Serdar]

One clarification:  if you "copy to" a public folder, it's client side.  If
you "forward to" the pf's email address then it's server side.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Client or Server??


If the action requires authenticating the user, or access to resources not
on the server side, it will be client side.

So - rules that direct to a .pst file are client side
Rules that permanently delete something (skip the Deleted Items folder) will
be client side Rules that direct items to a Public Folder will be client
side.

Probably some other circumstances, but those are the top three that users
complain to me about.

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: James Forbis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Client or Server??


Can someone tell me what makes an Inbox rule forced to be on the client. I
need some rules to be on the server only (without a client logged in) and I
am having problems with this..

Thanks

James Forbis, MCSE, CNE, CCA, CNS
4BIS.COM, Inc.
11491 Gideon Ln.
Cincinnati, OH 45249
PH (513)469-7887
FAX (513)469-7877
Cell (513)200-4079


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]