Re: Benchmarks
I know that there a completely different technologies evaluated as well. I was referring to the different performance numbers between Resin and Orionserver. Lawrence Fry wrote: > Christof, > > I read this article, and the comparison in this benchmark is between php, > perl and java. The benchmark is not intended to compared j2ee application > servers, and as noted in the article, only includes "toy" applications like > hello world. The conclusion of the article is that java is as good or better > than php and perl. > > However, lets make some comparisons. Orion is about 2% faster than Resin, > which in my book is nearly the same. However, Resin is not a j2ee server, > and uses non-j2ee ejb protocols. Most of us use Orion for the ejb support. > > Regards, > > Lawrence > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christof > Baumgärtner > Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2000 10:18 AM > To: Orion-Interest > Subject: Benchmarks > > Orionserver claims to be the fastest one out there. What is the official > comment to the numbers presented at > http://www.caucho.com/articles/benchmark.xtp ? begin:vcard n:Baumgärtner;Christof tel;cell:+49 171 8169911 tel;fax:+49 89 6797 tel;work:+49 89 6797 2220 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:www.websentric.com org:WebSentric AG adr:;;Raiffeisenallee 5;Oberhaching;;82041;Germany version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] note:Vice President CTO fn:Christof Baumgärtner end:vcard
Re: Performance for static files
Looks to me like if Orionserver tries to do HTTP/1.1 Keep-Alive without setting the Content-length accordingly. Can anybody confirm? Dale Bronk wrote: > Right now until I am proved otherwise, I disagree. I posted a message a day > or so ago and have no reply yet. Now I do believe that it is probably some > setting I have (although I am using the default settings from Orion), but my > web pages are not served very fast at all. I am on a PIII 256M using > Windows Server 2000 and tested the same static pages with Apache and IIS and > they really popup quickly. With Orion, the pages seem to completely display > but the browser keeps going for up to 10-15 seconds before it stops. > > I am not saying I disagree with the benchmarks, what I am saying is I agree > with them with the correct set of configurations as I have used the same > static pages on the same machine with Apache, IIS, and Orion. I did not use > any benchmarking tools other than my eye but it was very obvious (clearing > browser cache between each request) that as soon as the pages "appeared" to > be fully display (very small graphics, if any) using Apache and IIS, the > browser (both IE and NS) stopped. With Orion, the browsers just kept going > (not sure doing what) for another 10-15 seconds. > > Like I said, I am sure it is some configuration but I wish someone would > tell me what the setting is. I also tried browsing from several different > machines to make sure that it was not simply my browser. > > Dale > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 3:51 AM > Subject: SV: Performance for static files > > > Look at the benchmark page... > > > > Against Apache and IIS its got no problems at all beating them into the > > bushes. The url is enclosed, have fun... > > > > Klaus Myrseth > > > > -Opprinnelig melding- > > Fra: Christof Baumgaertner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sendt: 7. september 2000 08:40 > > Til: Orion-Interest > > Emne: Performance for static files > > > > > > We have a webbased client/server application which in addition to its > > dynamic elements has to serve a huge amount of small files (HTML, GIF, > > JS). I understand that Orionserver's performance for J2EE based > > applications is pretty good. How about serving static files from the > > file system? Can it compete with high performance servers like AOL > > Server, Stronghold Apache or others in this area? > > > > Thanks, > > Christof > > > > > > begin:vcard n:Baumgärtner;Christof tel;pager:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;cell:+49 171 8169911 tel;fax:+49 89 6797 tel;work:+49 89 6797 2220 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:www.websentric.com org:WebSentric AG adr:;;Raiffeisenallee 5;Oberhaching;;82041;Germany version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Vice President CTO x-mozilla-cpt:;-4208 fn:Christof Baumgärtner end:vcard
Re: SV: Performance for static files
This benchmarks do not show the numbers for static files which are read directly from the file system. I would like to see a comparison between a standard webserver (without any dynamic server technology like ASP, JSP, Servlets) serving static files and Orion. Are there any realworld numbers around? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Look at the benchmark page... > > Against Apache and IIS its got no problems at all beating them into the > bushes. The url is enclosed, have fun... > > Klaus Myrseth > > -Opprinnelig melding- > Fra: Christof Baumgaertner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sendt: 7. september 2000 08:40 > Til: Orion-Interest > Emne: Performance for static files > > We have a webbased client/server application which in addition to its > dynamic elements has to serve a huge amount of small files (HTML, GIF, > JS). I understand that Orionserver's performance for J2EE based > applications is pretty good. How about serving static files from the > file system? Can it compete with high performance servers like AOL > Server, Stronghold Apache or others in this area? > > Thanks, > Christof > > > >Benchmark.urlName: Benchmark.url > Type: Internet Shortcut >(application/x-unknown-content-type-InternetShortcut) begin:vcard n:Baumgärtner;Christof tel;pager:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;cell:+49 171 8169911 tel;fax:+49 89 6797 tel;work:+49 89 6797 2220 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:www.websentric.com org:WebSentric AG adr:;;Raiffeisenallee 5;Oberhaching;;82041;Germany version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Vice President CTO x-mozilla-cpt:;-4208 fn:Christof Baumgärtner end:vcard
Performance for static files
We have a webbased client/server application which in addition to its dynamic elements has to serve a huge amount of small files (HTML, GIF, JS). I understand that Orionserver's performance for J2EE based applications is pretty good. How about serving static files from the file system? Can it compete with high performance servers like AOL Server, Stronghold Apache or others in this area? Thanks, Christof
