This benchmarks do not show the numbers for static files which are read directly from 
the file
system. I would like to see a comparison between a standard webserver (without any 
dynamic server
technology like ASP, JSP, Servlets) serving static files and Orion. Are there any 
realworld
numbers around?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Look at the benchmark page...
>
> Against Apache and IIS its got no problems at all beating them into the
> bushes. The url is enclosed, have fun...
>
> Klaus Myrseth
>
> -----Opprinnelig melding-----
> Fra: Christof Baumgaertner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sendt: 7. september 2000 08:40
> Til: Orion-Interest
> Emne: Performance for static files
>
> We have a webbased client/server application which in addition to its
> dynamic elements has to serve a huge amount of small files (HTML, GIF,
> JS). I understand that Orionserver's performance for J2EE based
> applications is pretty good. How about serving static files from the
> file system? Can it compete with high performance servers like AOL
> Server, Stronghold Apache or others in this area?
>
> Thanks,
> Christof
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>    Benchmark.urlName: Benchmark.url
>                 Type: Internet Shortcut 
>(application/x-unknown-content-type-InternetShortcut)
begin:vcard 
n:Baumgärtner;Christof
tel;pager:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;cell:+49 171 8169911
tel;fax:+49 89 6797 1111
tel;work:+49 89 6797 2220
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:www.websentric.com
org:WebSentric AG
adr:;;Raiffeisenallee 5;Oberhaching;;82041;Germany
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Vice President CTO
x-mozilla-cpt:;-4208
fn:Christof Baumgärtner
end:vcard

Reply via email to