Looks to me like if Orionserver tries to do HTTP/1.1 Keep-Alive without setting the Content-length accordingly. Can anybody confirm? Dale Bronk wrote: > Right now until I am proved otherwise, I disagree. I posted a message a day > or so ago and have no reply yet. Now I do believe that it is probably some > setting I have (although I am using the default settings from Orion), but my > web pages are not served very fast at all. I am on a PIII 256M using > Windows Server 2000 and tested the same static pages with Apache and IIS and > they really popup quickly. With Orion, the pages seem to completely display > but the browser keeps going for up to 10-15 seconds before it stops. > > I am not saying I disagree with the benchmarks, what I am saying is I agree > with them with the correct set of configurations as I have used the same > static pages on the same machine with Apache, IIS, and Orion. I did not use > any benchmarking tools other than my eye but it was very obvious (clearing > browser cache between each request) that as soon as the pages "appeared" to > be fully display (very small graphics, if any) using Apache and IIS, the > browser (both IE and NS) stopped. With Orion, the browsers just kept going > (not sure doing what) for another 10-15 seconds. > > Like I said, I am sure it is some configuration but I wish someone would > tell me what the setting is. I also tried browsing from several different > machines to make sure that it was not simply my browser. > > Dale > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 3:51 AM > Subject: SV: Performance for static files > > > Look at the benchmark page... > > > > Against Apache and IIS its got no problems at all beating them into the > > bushes. The url is enclosed, have fun... > > > > Klaus Myrseth > > > > -----Opprinnelig melding----- > > Fra: Christof Baumgaertner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sendt: 7. september 2000 08:40 > > Til: Orion-Interest > > Emne: Performance for static files > > > > > > We have a webbased client/server application which in addition to its > > dynamic elements has to serve a huge amount of small files (HTML, GIF, > > JS). I understand that Orionserver's performance for J2EE based > > applications is pretty good. How about serving static files from the > > file system? Can it compete with high performance servers like AOL > > Server, Stronghold Apache or others in this area? > > > > Thanks, > > Christof > > > > > >
begin:vcard n:Baumgärtner;Christof tel;pager:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;cell:+49 171 8169911 tel;fax:+49 89 6797 1111 tel;work:+49 89 6797 2220 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:www.websentric.com org:WebSentric AG adr:;;Raiffeisenallee 5;Oberhaching;;82041;Germany version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Vice President CTO x-mozilla-cpt:;-4208 fn:Christof Baumgärtner end:vcard
