Re: Usable ISO with K-3
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 12:32 AM Alan C wrote: > My K5 is OK up to 3200, noisy beyond. The K7 & K110D were already noisy > at 800. I hated the K7 at anything above base ISO. I still think it had the nicest skin tone rendering I’ve seen out of a digital camera, providing it was kept at ISO 100. bill > > > Alan C > > > On 21-Jul-18 07:40 PM, Ken Waller wrote: > > I almost never shoot above 400 ISO in my outdoor photography, a force > > of habit. > > For comparisons I shot some birdy images at the feeder and varied the > > ISO up to 51200, same f stop with varying shutter speeds. > > > > Surprise, surprise but I got very usable captures up to 25600, but not > > so much @ 51200 - which produced a noticeable color shift. > > > > A subjective evaluation that will give me a little more leeway in the > > field. > > > > Wondering what list members have found in this regard with their DSLRs ? > > > > Kenneth Waller > > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller > > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Usable ISO with K-3
My K5 is OK up to 3200, noisy beyond. The K7 & K110D were already noisy at 800. Alan C On 21-Jul-18 07:40 PM, Ken Waller wrote: I almost never shoot above 400 ISO in my outdoor photography, a force of habit. For comparisons I shot some birdy images at the feeder and varied the ISO up to 51200, same f stop with varying shutter speeds. Surprise, surprise but I got very usable captures up to 25600, but not so much @ 51200 - which produced a noticeable color shift. A subjective evaluation that will give me a little more leeway in the field. Wondering what list members have found in this regard with their DSLRs ? Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
PESO x 2: Martial Eagle
A Martial Eagle on the ground with its prey under Autumn shade Mopane scrub near the Phalaborwa gate in the Kruger Park. This is our largest Eagle with a wingspan of about 2m. Not so common any more. Range about 30m. A lucky sighting. https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/43514564942/ K5 with the Sigma 70-500 DG @ 500mm cropped. Alan C --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Random Flowers
On 7/20/2018 5:03 PM, Ken Waller wrote: Exactly as I pictured it! Now go and make a large print of it. Simply stunning! Already done. The print is positively 3 dimensional. Now she who must be obeyed needs me to build a frame for it, cut a mat, mount it, get glass for it and submit it to her for the ceremony of presentation. Thanks all for looking and commenting. I don't show a lot of images, but I think this lens might be the inanimate object I need to get my sorry ass off the couch. Hopefully more to come. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Usable ISO with K-3
On 7/21/2018 11:40 AM, Ken Waller wrote: I almost never shoot above 400 ISO in my outdoor photography, a force of habit. For comparisons I shot some birdy images at the feeder and varied the ISO up to 51200, same f stop with varying shutter speeds. Surprise, surprise but I got very usable captures up to 25600, but not so much @ 51200 - which produced a noticeable color shift. A subjective evaluation that will give me a little more leeway in the field. Wondering what list members have found in this regard with their DSLRs ? I was pretty happy with the K3 up to 3200, and would go to 6400 in a pinch. With the K1 (I know, you aren't asking), I'm good with 6400 and still find 12800 quite usable, though also somewhat unbelievable. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - Chartres Chancel
Thanks, Joe. Rick > On Jul 21, 2018, at 12:21 PM, jtainter wrote: > > Wonderful series. I love photographing in places like that. Someday I will > have to get there. Thanks also for the story, which I hadn't known. > > Joe > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Peso: Random Flowers
Wow. Makes my lens buying envy kick in.Regards, Bob S. On 7/20/18, Bill wrote: > This is a focus stack with the D FA 50/1.4. After some testing, I > determined it's best aperture is f/5.6, so that is what I shot at. > I'm over the moon happy with this lens so far. > > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/addons/K13599-3626stack.html > > Technical: Pentax K1, D FA* 50mm f/1.4 1/5 second. 28 image stack > > enjoy > > bill > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Peso: Ashley on her 13th birthday (NSFMJ)
Thanks , Mark! I see you "cheated" as Rick would say about my habit of looking at a whole gallery after getting pointed to one shot :-) Ashley came home with me on July 16th , 2006 -- she was about a year , based on papers that had her as 10 months in mid May. So I decided JUly 16th should be the dateto remember. Hope your cats are in as good shape as Ashley is ann On 7/21/2018 6:53 PM, Mark C wrote: A very nice gallery and a lovely cat. My two black cats are turning 13 sometime this summer - don't know their birth dates but adopted them as kittens in October 2005. Tempus Fugit, as they say. Mark ann sanfedele wrote: https://annsan.smugmug.com/The-Kitty-Corner/Ashley-ultimate-alpha-tabby/i-MPbvjGh/A not fond of the lighting - but it was what was available - actually taken a couple of days ago ann -- ann sanfedele photography https://annsan.smugmug.com https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Peso: Ashley on her 13th birthday (NSFMJ)
A very nice gallery and a lovely cat. My two black cats are turning 13 sometime this summer - don't know their birth dates but adopted them as kittens in October 2005. Tempus Fugit, as they say. Mark ann sanfedele wrote: https://annsan.smugmug.com/The-Kitty-Corner/Ashley-ultimate-alpha-tabby/i-MPbvjGh/A not fond of the lighting - but it was what was available - actually taken a couple of days ago ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Pentax sighting
I think the Program A was essentially the same as the Super Program, which was my first SLR after my 1966 Spotmatic. It was a very reliable camera Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 3:45 PM, John Sessoms wrote: > Taking a break from laying tile in the kitchen I decided to take a moment > to peruse PetaPixel. > > There's an article with an accompanying video from a guy who's building a > DIY "Auto" Film Processor (more semi-auto at this point). But he's got it > programmed for B&W, C41 and E6 films. > > https://petapixel.com/2018/07/19/the-developist-is-an-in-dev > elopment-diy-auto-film-processor/ > > But the real treat comes at the end of his video (14:05) when he gives us > a look at the results and there's a Pentax Program A w/SMC PENTAX-A 1:1.7 > 50mm lens sitting on the counter next to the roll of processed negatives. > > Also on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ci6cSlf7kU > > > -- > Science - Questions we may never find answers for. > Religion - Answers we must never question. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Usable ISO with K-3
Not approaching anything like 1, but I'm solidly comfortable with a 1250 auto TAV setting, which surprises me with each happening on my K3ll. J Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 21, 2018, at 12:38 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > > > TLDR: In most situations I find that I can push up to 10,000 and get usable > images, particularly when shooting social or dance events indoors. I'm much > better off doing 10,000 without a flash than annoying, or distracting, folks > with a flash at lower ISOs. > > Too noisy is very subjective and depends on the situation. I find the noise > at ISO 10,000 comparable to the grain on Tri-X. > > I have found that I have lost far more photos trying to preserve ISO and > ending up at too slow of a shutter speed, or too narrow of a depth of field > than I have by pushing the ISO too hard. > > I have found that with hard drives being under $50/terabyte, unless I am > shooting action, there is little downside to experimenting widely with > exposure particularly with "tripod shots". > > There is also little downside to just going out and experimenting, pushing > beyond what I consider the limits of the camera to learn. > > Also, as image processing improves, raw files that were too noisy a few years > ago can now be cleaned up quite satisfactorily. > > I have found that with the iso-invariance of the cameras, bracketing ISO has > little benefit, unless I'm in danger of blowing out highlights. So, if I'm > bracketing I'm usually either in Av or M mode. As I think about this, I may > want to experiment again with bracketing in Tav mode, because blown > highlights tend to be the danger. > > In good light, in auto exposure, I'll shoot at ISO 100 and Av mode. > > If I can't get ISO 100, in auto exposure, I'll set the shutter speed and > aperture I need and take whatever ISO I can get in Tav mode. One time I was > doing this at a concert, one frame looked a bit grainy, but still usable, and > it turned out to be ISO 25,600. > > Back when doing low light work with much older tech sensors, I found that if > something is noisier than I like, if I process in black and white the noise > just looks like grainier film, and is much less objectionable. > > > Ken Waller wrote on 7/21/18 10:40 AM: >> I almost never shoot above 400 ISO in my outdoor photography, a force of >> habit. >> For comparisons I shot some birdy images at the feeder and varied the ISO up >> to 51200, same f stop with varying shutter speeds. >> Surprise, surprise but I got very usable captures up to 25600, but not so >> much @ 51200 - which produced a noticeable color shift. >> A subjective evaluation that will give me a little more leeway in the field. >> Wondering what list members have found in this regard with their DSLRs ? >> Kenneth Waller >> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller > > > -- > Larry Colen l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc > https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/collections/72157612824732477/ > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Pentax sighting
Taking a break from laying tile in the kitchen I decided to take a moment to peruse PetaPixel. There's an article with an accompanying video from a guy who's building a DIY "Auto" Film Processor (more semi-auto at this point). But he's got it programmed for B&W, C41 and E6 films. https://petapixel.com/2018/07/19/the-developist-is-an-in-development-diy-auto-film-processor/ But the real treat comes at the end of his video (14:05) when he gives us a look at the results and there's a Pentax Program A w/SMC PENTAX-A 1:1.7 50mm lens sitting on the counter next to the roll of processed negatives. Also on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ci6cSlf7kU -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Usable ISO with K-3
TLDR: In most situations I find that I can push up to 10,000 and get usable images, particularly when shooting social or dance events indoors. I'm much better off doing 10,000 without a flash than annoying, or distracting, folks with a flash at lower ISOs. Too noisy is very subjective and depends on the situation. I find the noise at ISO 10,000 comparable to the grain on Tri-X. I have found that I have lost far more photos trying to preserve ISO and ending up at too slow of a shutter speed, or too narrow of a depth of field than I have by pushing the ISO too hard. I have found that with hard drives being under $50/terabyte, unless I am shooting action, there is little downside to experimenting widely with exposure particularly with "tripod shots". There is also little downside to just going out and experimenting, pushing beyond what I consider the limits of the camera to learn. Also, as image processing improves, raw files that were too noisy a few years ago can now be cleaned up quite satisfactorily. I have found that with the iso-invariance of the cameras, bracketing ISO has little benefit, unless I'm in danger of blowing out highlights. So, if I'm bracketing I'm usually either in Av or M mode. As I think about this, I may want to experiment again with bracketing in Tav mode, because blown highlights tend to be the danger. In good light, in auto exposure, I'll shoot at ISO 100 and Av mode. If I can't get ISO 100, in auto exposure, I'll set the shutter speed and aperture I need and take whatever ISO I can get in Tav mode. One time I was doing this at a concert, one frame looked a bit grainy, but still usable, and it turned out to be ISO 25,600. Back when doing low light work with much older tech sensors, I found that if something is noisier than I like, if I process in black and white the noise just looks like grainier film, and is much less objectionable. Ken Waller wrote on 7/21/18 10:40 AM: I almost never shoot above 400 ISO in my outdoor photography, a force of habit. For comparisons I shot some birdy images at the feeder and varied the ISO up to 51200, same f stop with varying shutter speeds. Surprise, surprise but I got very usable captures up to 25600, but not so much @ 51200 - which produced a noticeable color shift. A subjective evaluation that will give me a little more leeway in the field. Wondering what list members have found in this regard with their DSLRs ? Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/collections/72157612824732477/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Usable ISO with K-3
I used to shoot the K20D up to 1600 ISO, anything above that was usually unusable for large prints. The K-5II seems to be good up to 25600 if you like somewhat chunky* grain at times, color usually seems good with A, F and FA lenses, would probably be just as good with DA lenses but I don't own any. The color is really yellow even when using the highest correction factor under tungsten light with M and K lenses on the K5II. I've also gotten decent results with the *ist-D and Ds at 800 and sometimes 1600, though the latter were usually converted to B&W. Yes, I do still have a *ist-Ds that I use in places that I don't want to risk damage to a better camera. It's effective monetary value is nothing, and slapping an old M 40mm f2.8 lens, (also effectively worth nothing), on it is like going back to using a Spotmatic and TriX 400, it's actually easier to get used to than using the K20D after mostly using the K-5II. *A lot like old GAF 500 ASA slide film except at a much higher sensitivity. On 7/21/2018 1:40 PM, Ken Waller wrote: I almost never shoot above 400 ISO in my outdoor photography, a force of habit. For comparisons I shot some birdy images at the feeder and varied the ISO up to 51200, same f stop with varying shutter speeds. Surprise, surprise but I got very usable captures up to 25600, but not so much @ 51200 - which produced a noticeable color shift. A subjective evaluation that will give me a little more leeway in the field. Wondering what list members have found in this regard with their DSLRs ? Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller -- America wasn't founded so that we could all be better. America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please. - P.J. O'Rourke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Usable ISO with K-3
I’m right where you are. With both the K-2 and K-3, 25600 seems to be the practical limit. The K-1 shows a slight advantage, probably due to sensor size. When shooting birds or sports I try to keep it at 6400 or less, but go with what nature gives me. Shooting cars for publication I go for 400 or less when using the tripod. Handheld, I go to 1600 if necessary. Paul > On Jul 21, 2018, at 1:40 PM, Ken Waller wrote: > > I almost never shoot above 400 ISO in my outdoor photography, a force of > habit. > For comparisons I shot some birdy images at the feeder and varied the ISO up > to 51200, same f stop with varying shutter speeds. > > Surprise, surprise but I got very usable captures up to 25600, but not so > much @ 51200 - which produced a noticeable color shift. > > A subjective evaluation that will give me a little more leeway in the field. > > Wondering what list members have found in this regard with their DSLRs ? > > Kenneth Waller > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Usable ISO with K-3
I almost never shoot above 400 ISO in my outdoor photography, a force of habit. For comparisons I shot some birdy images at the feeder and varied the ISO up to 51200, same f stop with varying shutter speeds. Surprise, surprise but I got very usable captures up to 25600, but not so much @ 51200 - which produced a noticeable color shift. A subjective evaluation that will give me a little more leeway in the field. Wondering what list members have found in this regard with their DSLRs ? Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - Chartres Chancel
Wonderful series. I love photographing in places like that. Someday I will have to get there. Thanks also for the story, which I hadn't known. Joe -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
DFA 150-450
Here are a couple of my first efforts with the DFA 150-450. So far I am seriously impressed with this lens: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/61391546 https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/61400986 Also, I did a quickie comparison of the DFA 150-450 at 450 mm. with the FA* 400 F5.6. If interested, it is here: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/61397336 Joe -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - Chartres Chancel
GREAT story! Thanks for sharing it. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 9:25 PM, Rick Womer wrote: > https://rickwomer.smugmug.com/AMS-to-CDG/AMS-to-CDG-2018/i-3hhcBqQ/A > > (K-5, DA 17-70) > > Historical note: > > The current cathedral was finished in 1220, and apart from some damage > during the French Revolution (which the townsfolk stopped) has stood intact > since. > > In World War II, the cathedral escaped bomb damage by chance (the stained > glass had been removed and stored elsewhere), but in August 1944 a company > of American troops was ordered to destroy it, based on information that the > Nazi army was still there. A colonel (Wellborn Griffith) and his driver > motored over to the cathedral alone, searched it from the crypt to the tops > of the towers, found no enemy, and refused the order to destroy it. The > town was captured peacefully. Col. Griffith was killed in action later the > same day 3.5 km away, and was awarded the Distinguished Service Cross, the > Silver Star, and the French Croix de Guerre and Legion d’Honneur > posthumously. > > Rick > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Peso: Birdhouse
Sharp, clear and well photographed. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Bill wrote: > A quick snapshot to show the rather delicious bokeh off the D FA* 50/1.4 > I stopped down a tiny bit to get a little more than paper thin DOF. The > light was failing, so the ISO is ridiculously high. I think the K1 handles > that rather well. > > > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/addons/birdhouse1.html > > Technical: K1 D FA* 50/1.4 at F/5, 1/125, ISO3200 > > bill > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Peso: Random Flowers
WOW! What a great effect. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Bill wrote: > This is a focus stack with the D FA 50/1.4. After some testing, I > determined it's best aperture is f/5.6, so that is what I shot at. > I'm over the moon happy with this lens so far. > > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/addons/K13599-3626stack.html > > Technical: Pentax K1, D FA* 50mm f/1.4 1/5 second. 28 image stack > > enjoy > > bill > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESOs (2) - Chartres Cathedral Window
Thanks, Rick. What you say is very sensible and practical. I have managed to grab a few nice images of stained glass: one from Notre Dame is in the 2017 PDML annual. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Rick Womer wrote: > Thanks, folks! > > Dan, I stand as far away as is practical, do my best to be centered (R > to L, and of course mentally!), and spot meter the glass with a bit of > bracketing. Sometimes one can include the surrounding masonry, but > usually (as in this shot) there's not enough ambient light. > > Ann, you're cheating! I'm glad you're enjoying them, though. > > Rick > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:38 AM, ann sanfedele wrote: > > I enjoy looking atthe whole gallery in the collage mode - which works as > a > > kind of stained glass windowon my nice big monitor.. > > I agree Rick has the stained glass windows down - but the exterior shots > > interest me more.. I waffle on which I like best.. > > > > ann > > > > > > On 7/20/2018 12:40 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: > >> > >> Both are very nice, Rick with great rendition of the colors in the > >> windows. > >> > >> Taking image of stained glass appear to be a simple process, but it is > >> not. I tried that at Notre Dame and Rouen last year, and it is tricky > >> indeed. You obviously have the knack, rick. > >> > >> > >> Dan Matyola > >> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 9:19 PM, Rick Womer > wrote: > >> > >>> https://rickwomer.smugmug.com/AMS-to-CDG/AMS-to-CDG-2018/i-4H2dcqb/A > >>> > >>> Detail: > >>> > >>> https://rickwomer.smugmug.com/AMS-to-CDG/AMS-to-CDG-2018/i-3t7J7jP/A > >>> > >>> (K-5, DA 17-70) > >>> > >>> Comments appreciated! > >>> > >>> Rick > >>> > >>> -- > >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>> PDML@pdml.net > >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > >>> follow the directions. > >>> > > > > -- > > ann sanfedele photography > > https://annsan.smugmug.com > > https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff > > https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan > > > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > > follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO: Peru - Machu Picchu
Terrific collection, Stan! J Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 20, 2018, at 8:22 PM, Stanley Halpin > wrote: > > Thanks Rick! I got lucky with the weather. Meg literally had tears in her > eyes when we first stepped around the corner and saw the scene, it was just > so otherworldly. > > My family lived in Bolivia for several years when I was a teen. But I was > back in the States at the point when my mother and brother went to Machu > Picchu. I’ve seen their photos (and others’), I’ve heard their stories, and I > am very pleased to have finally seen it through my own eyes. > > Like in many too-popular tourist sites, the Peruvian park service is slowly > tightening restrictions on visits. No more all-day passes, soon if not > already you need to be with a guide at all times, etc. Reasonable and > necessary, but restrictive. If you have any thought of going, sooner is > better. > > And thanks for working through whatever web browser issues in order to take a > look. > > stan > >> On Jul 20, 2018, at 9:11 PM, Rick Womer wrote: >> >> Stan, those are gorgeous! The interplay of stone, grass, and clouds at the >> top is especially beautiful and intriguing. >> >> Rick >> >> >>> On Jul 19, 2018, at 9:36 PM, Stan Halpin >>> wrote: >>> >>> Maybe you need to wait longer while the empty boxes get populated with the >>> image icons? I just checked from my iPad and it looks right. >>> >>> If you want, try to go to the top level photos.stanhalpin.com and navigate >>> to the particular gallery... >>> >>> stan >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> On Jul 19, 2018, at 9:28 PM, Rick Womer wrote: Stan, I get nothing but white squares on a black background, whether I use Firefox or Safari. Rick > On Jul 15, 2018, at 4:08 PM, Stanley Halpin > wrote: > > A large gallery (90 images) of shots from my trip in early April this > year. We went first to a jungle lodge in the Peruvian Amazon, then to > Cuzco and on to Machu Picchu. As with my Ecuador gallery, some of the > shots are there because I am quite pleased with them, others are there > because I think they help to provide a visual travelogue of sorts… > > http://photos.stanhalpin.com/p707179303 > > stan > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO a bunch of critters
You need to look into their eyes.. > On 21 July 2018 at 02:39 Rick Womer wrote: > > > One thing for sure: Our mascot is NOT a beautiful bird, even when expertly > photographed. > > Rick > > > On Jul 14, 2018, at 6:41 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > > > > PESO: PDML discussion > > > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/43363009902/in/album-72157669137217797/ > > > > > > I'm finally back from my trip North. What was supposed to be a relatively > > short trip for a tango event and then visiting became a lot more > > complicated as things came up and we had to come up with new living > > arrangements for my mom. > > > > I'm starting in on my huge backlog of photos. Today, I tackled my wildlife > > photos. > > > > Here is my fauna album: > > > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157669137217797 > > > > Comments and suggestion are always appreciated. > > > > Here are a bunch more photos of critters that I liked but not quite as much > > as the ones above: > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157693255549880 > > > > Some of them are technically challenged, but still fun, like the ones of > > what I think are kingbirds dive bombing a bald eagle. I ran into some > > issues at SNWR with the flange mount of my bigma coming a bit loose. > > > > > > Here are some flower pictures: > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157693251449550 > > > > I learned a few things that might come in handy on future trips: > > > > A lot of birds (mostly cormorants) nest under the Yaquina Bay Bridge in > > Newport. I had hoped to go back when the light wasn't quite so harsh, but > > that was one of many things I wasn't able to get to on this trip. > > > > A Dodge van is very suboptinal for the car tour of the Sacramento National > > Wildlife Refuge. It turns out that you aren't allowed out of your car > > except in a few spots there, even in the summer when there aren't many > > skittish birds around. I'd like to go back in a convertible so that I'm > > not trying to take photos while hanging out of the driver's window. > > > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.