Re: Christmas cards

2002-11-13 Thread Paul Stenquist
I've been using an Epson 1200 for about five years. I've experienced
clogged heads five times or so, but the problem was always solved with a
nozzle cleaning or two. I'm extremely pleased with the performance of
this printer.
  In my line of work I have the opportunity to review the portfolios of
numerous high-dollar pros. Most of the portfolios consist of inkjet
prints. I've inquired numerous times in regard to how they were
produced. All were done on Epsons. Some on 2000s, some on 1270s or
1280s, and quite a few on the older 1200s.
Paul Stenquist

Doug Franklin wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:18:14 -, Rob Brigham wrote:
> 
> > If I print more than 2 or so sheets of A4 without running
> > normal porous paper in the meantime then one or other of the
> > heads often clogs.
> 
> I haven't had a problem like that.  If I had, I'd have returned the
> printer.
> 
> TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ




RE: Christmas cards

2002-11-13 Thread Rob Brigham
I guess you must source your comparison tests outside the entire suite
of UK photographic publications then.

> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:pnstenquist@;comcast.net] 
> Sent: 13 November 2002 01:41
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Christmas cards
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Rob Brigham wrote:
> > 
> > Consensus is that Canon has now overtaken Epson in the 
> quality stakes.
> 
> The comparison tests I've seen seem to indicate otherwise. 
> Unless, perhaps, you're tooking about the quality of the 
> machinery rather than the quality of the output. Paul
> 
> 




Re: Christmas cards

2002-11-12 Thread Paul Stenquist


Rob Brigham wrote:
> 
> Consensus is that Canon has now overtaken Epson in the quality stakes.

The comparison tests I've seen seem to indicate otherwise. Unless,
perhaps, you're tooking about the quality of the machinery rather than
the quality of the output.
Paul




RE: Christmas cards

2002-11-12 Thread Doug Franklin
Hi Mike,

On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 07:56:23 -0800, Michael Perham wrote:

> [...] [some Epson inkjet printers] use 6 colours [...]

IMHO, no matter what other choices you make, you _do_ want an inkjet
that uses six or more colors.  In the Epsons, they add light cyan and
light magenta to the normal cyan, magenta, yellow, and black palette. 
I understand that there are also printers out recently that add a
"light black" (gray) ink for a palette of seven colors, too.  Haven't
tried one of those.

TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ





RE: Christmas cards

2002-11-12 Thread Rob Brigham
Consensus is that Canon has now overtaken Epson in the quality stakes,
but the comparable models are double the price and the ink is more
expensive too!

HP are way behind in quality, but generally ahead in terms of speed.

Lexmark are a good budget buy, but be aware you are getting budget
quality - possibly above HP though.

> -Original Message-
> From: Herb Chong [mailto:HerbChong@;compuserve.com] 
> Sent: 12 November 2002 16:19
> To: INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Christmas cards
> 
> 
> Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >I guess both camps have their pro's and con's.  I think I 
> will go with 
> >the
> Epson!
> 
> Mike.<
> 
> i observed before that at the PhotoPlus Expo in NYC a week 
> ago, anyone who was doing digital output and wasn't a printer 
> vendor was using an Epson. right now, they are the benchmark 
> in quality of photo reproduction. Canon and HP are trying to 
> catch up, but i couldn't tell from what they had at the Expo 
> whether they were close or not.
> 
> Herb
> 
> 




Re: Re: Christmas cards

2002-11-12 Thread David Brooks
Canon S800 and 900 are good
Dave

 Begin Original Message 

From: Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 07:23:55 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Christmas cards




Dr E D F Williams wrote:
> 
> Argh! I rank Epson with Microsoft - as far as business ethics 
goes. The
> damn thing uses more ink cleaning the jets than it does printing. I 
can't
> keep feeding it at 50 Euros a meal. Can't afford to keep this pet 
alive.
> Once, a couple of Christmases back, I used a colour cartridge up - 
without
> getting one decent print. So good-bye Epson. Maybe one day I'll buy 
a
> printer that has the jets on the cartridges.

That's someone like Hewlett Packard ~ but let me tell you, I've had
three increasingly more expensive H-Ps, and I've yet to see a
home-based H-P (ink-jet) printer that can hold a candle to Epson when
it comes to color photographic style images/prints...

Gotta be some other, less-expensive answer than Epson's ink-devouring
printers, I'd say. Maybe it hasn't been designed yet...

On the other hand, I LOVE my Epson digital camera! Outstanding photos!
So long as I just keep 'em on a screen somewhere, they're perfect for
viewing, and the whole thing is [relatively] inexpensive.

keith whaley
 
> To start with of course it was wonderful. I got very good prints 
after the
> initial setting up - getting the monitor and output to look more or 
less the
> same.
> 
> Don



 End Original Message 




Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/
http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail 




RE: Christmas cards

2002-11-12 Thread Herb Chong
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I guess both camps have their pro's and con's.  I think I will go with the
Epson!

Mike.<

i observed before that at the PhotoPlus Expo in NYC a week ago, anyone who
was doing digital output and wasn't a printer vendor was using an Epson.
right now, they are the benchmark in quality of photo reproduction. Canon
and HP are trying to catch up, but i couldn't tell from what they had at
the Expo whether they were close or not.

Herb




RE: Christmas cards

2002-11-12 Thread Michael Perham
I have been using HP at my office; they have the jets built into the
cartridge and are very reliable.  However, I have been thinking about a new
printer for home which will be used extensively for printing photo's now
that I have a film scanner and a digital camera (both acquired recently).
I am leaning to the Epson line because they do have the jets in the printer,
not the cartridge and that makes the cartridges very much cheaper.  Also,
many of their models use 6 colours with separate cartridges for each so you
are not forced to buy a new cartridge just because one colour is depleted.

I guess both camps have their pro's and con's.  I think I will go with the
Epson!


Mike.

-Original Message-
From: Dr E D F Williams [mailto:don.williams@;pp.inet.fi]
Sent: November 12, 2002 6:06 AM


Argh! I rank Epson with Microsoft - as far as business ethics goes. The
damn thing uses more ink cleaning the jets than it does printing. I can't
keep feeding it at 50 Euros a meal. Can't afford to keep this pet alive.
Once, a couple of Christmases back, I used a colour cartridge up - without
getting one decent print. So good-bye Epson. Maybe one day I'll buy a
printer that has the jets on the cartridges.




Re: Christmas cards

2002-11-12 Thread Keith Whaley


Dr E D F Williams wrote:
> 
> Argh! I rank Epson with Microsoft - as far as business ethics goes. The
> damn thing uses more ink cleaning the jets than it does printing. I can't
> keep feeding it at 50 Euros a meal. Can't afford to keep this pet alive.
> Once, a couple of Christmases back, I used a colour cartridge up - without
> getting one decent print. So good-bye Epson. Maybe one day I'll buy a
> printer that has the jets on the cartridges.

That's someone like Hewlett Packard ~ but let me tell you, I've had
three increasingly more expensive H-Ps, and I've yet to see a
home-based H-P (ink-jet) printer that can hold a candle to Epson when
it comes to color photographic style images/prints...

Gotta be some other, less-expensive answer than Epson's ink-devouring
printers, I'd say. Maybe it hasn't been designed yet...

On the other hand, I LOVE my Epson digital camera! Outstanding photos!
So long as I just keep 'em on a screen somewhere, they're perfect for
viewing, and the whole thing is [relatively] inexpensive.

keith whaley
 
> To start with of course it was wonderful. I got very good prints after the
> initial setting up - getting the monitor and output to look more or less the
> same.
> 
> Don




Re: Christmas cards

2002-11-11 Thread Dr E D F Williams
I do the whole thing using Photoshop. Before I lost faith in that disgusting
Epson Photo 750 I printed them, six to an A4 sheet, and mounted them on
card. Now only those folk who have who have email connections, and can
handle HTML, get cards from us. That's everyone (221) in my address book.

Some of the cards turned out rather well.

Don

Dr E D F Williams

http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
Updated: March 30, 2002


- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 2:24 AM
Subject: Re: Christmas cards


> Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Hi All,
> >I noticed that Don mentioned taking pictures for a Christmas card. I've
been
> >thinking of making some this year.
> >Do other PDMLer do this? If so, any hints or tips?
>
> I've done it. Used one of the pre-packages card kits. Actually, the cards
> were for some friends of my S.O. who did a Sierra Club trip out West a
> couple of years ago and made friends with some Navaho people on the
> reservation. They're pretty strapped for money (to put it mildly) so we
made
> Christmas cards for them. They emailed me photos and I tweaked them in
> Photoshop and blew up a bit with Genuine Fractals (they were pretty small
> files). Came out quite nice.
>
> --
> Mark Roberts
> www.robertstech.com
> Photography and writing
>





Re: Christmas cards

2002-11-11 Thread Jim Apilado
I look for something interesting to use for a Christmas card.  The picture
for this season's card was taken last May when "Kows for Kids" was in town.
I slapped a Santa cap on the head of a blue face "kow"  and took a close up
of it. When I had the card made up on couple of weeks ago I had this printed
on it: "Moo" ry Christmas and Happy "Moo" Year.
Another season I had a large stuffed frog wearing a Santa cap and gazing up
at a computer screen.  On the screen it said "Happy Holidays!  Kiss me
quick?"

Jim A.

> From: Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 08:08:10 +0800
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Christmas cards
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 19:08:21 -0500
> 
> Hi All,
> I noticed that Don mentioned taking pictures for a Christmas card. I've been
> thinking of making some this year.
> Do other PDMLer do this? If so, any hints or tips?
> 
> Cheers,
> Simon
> 
> Dr E D F Williams wrote:
>> in time for new pictures for this year's Christmas card.
> 
> 
> 




RE: Christmas cards

2002-11-11 Thread Amita Guha
I haven't done Xmas cards, but I did the cover of my wedding invitations
by applying a filter to a photo in Photoshop to make it look like a
painting. It came out great. I know a couple of people who make all
their cards at home. You can get great results with a standard inkjet
printer and some decent paper or cardstock. Good luck!

--Amita