r3017 - packages/opencpn/trunk/debian
Author: tille Date: 2011-06-17 07:51:02 + (Fri, 17 Jun 2011) New Revision: 3017 Modified: packages/opencpn/trunk/debian/control Log: Added Vcs-Fields (needed these for Blends tasks page anyway); bumped Standards-Version Modified: packages/opencpn/trunk/debian/control === --- packages/opencpn/trunk/debian/control 2011-06-17 07:26:47 UTC (rev 3016) +++ packages/opencpn/trunk/debian/control 2011-06-17 07:51:02 UTC (rev 3017) @@ -5,8 +5,10 @@ Uploaders: Anton Martchukov an...@martchukov.com, Hamish Bowman hamis...@yahoo.com Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7.0.50~), cmake, libglu-dev, libwxbase2.8-dev, libwxgtk2.8-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, zlib1g-dev, libbz2-dev, libgps-dev -Standards-Version: 3.8.4 +Standards-Version: 3.9.2 Homepage: http://www.opencpn.org/ +Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-grass/packages/opencpn/trunk/?rev=0sc=0 +Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-grass/packages/opencpn/trunk/debian/ Package: opencpn Architecture: any ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
r3018 - packages/opencpn/trunk/debian
Author: tille Date: 2011-06-17 12:41:31 + (Fri, 17 Jun 2011) New Revision: 3018 Modified: packages/opencpn/trunk/debian/control Log: Just learned that ?\226?\128?\156?rev=0sc=0?\226?\128?\157 breaks redirection on Alioth ... Modified: packages/opencpn/trunk/debian/control === --- packages/opencpn/trunk/debian/control 2011-06-17 07:51:02 UTC (rev 3017) +++ packages/opencpn/trunk/debian/control 2011-06-17 12:41:31 UTC (rev 3018) @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ libwxgtk2.8-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, zlib1g-dev, libbz2-dev, libgps-dev Standards-Version: 3.9.2 Homepage: http://www.opencpn.org/ -Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-grass/packages/opencpn/trunk/?rev=0sc=0 +Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-grass/packages/opencpn/trunk/ Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-grass/packages/opencpn/trunk/debian/ Package: opencpn ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
r3096 - in packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian: . source
Author: tille Date: 2013-06-05 09:39:13 + (Wed, 05 Jun 2013) New Revision: 3096 Added: packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/source/ packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/source/format Log: Preparing team upload: Source format 3.0 (quilt) Added: packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/source/format === --- packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/source/format (rev 0) +++ packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/source/format 2013-06-05 09:39:13 UTC (rev 3096) @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +3.0 (quilt) ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
r3097 - packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian
Author: tille
Date: 2013-06-05 09:41:00 + (Wed, 05 Jun 2013)
New Revision: 3097
Modified:
packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/changelog
packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/compat
packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/control
packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/rules
Log:
Preparing team upload: Mass changes to packaging regarding recent standards;
switched from cdbs to dh because I simply do not understand cdbs; build does
not yet work but I'll investigate on debian-mentors
Modified: packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/changelog 2013-06-05 09:39:13 UTC (rev
3096)
+++ packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/changelog 2013-06-05 09:41:00 UTC (rev
3097)
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+mkgmap (0.0.0+svn2640-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Team upload.
+ * New upstream version
+Closes: #580170
+ * debian/source/format: 3.0 (quilt)
+ * debian/control:
+ - Standards-Version: 3.9.4
+ - Removed DM-Upload-Allowed
+ - Update (Build-)Depends to recent Java standard
+ - debhelper 9
+ - Add time to Build-Depends which is obviously needed
+ * debian/rules: dh $@ --with javahelper
+
+ -- Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:24:59 +0200
+
mkgmap (0.0.0+svn1067-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Andreas Putzo ]
Modified: packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/compat
===
--- packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/compat 2013-06-05 09:39:13 UTC (rev 3096)
+++ packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/compat 2013-06-05 09:41:00 UTC (rev 3097)
@@ -1 +1 @@
-7
+9
Modified: packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/control
===
--- packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/control2013-06-05 09:39:13 UTC (rev
3096)
+++ packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/control2013-06-05 09:41:00 UTC (rev
3097)
@@ -2,17 +2,23 @@
Section: utils
Priority: extra
Maintainer: Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
-Uploaders: Andreas Putzo andr...@putzo.net, Francesco Paolo Lovergine
fran...@debian.org
-DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
-Build-Depends: ant, cdbs, debhelper (= 7), java-gcj-compat-dev
-Standards-Version: 3.8.2
+Uploaders: Andreas Putzo andr...@putzo.net,
+ Francesco Paolo Lovergine fran...@debian.org
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9),
+ javahelper (=0.25),
+ ant,
+ default-jdk,
+ time
+Standards-Version: 3.9.4
Homepage: http://www.mkgmap.org.uk
Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-grass/packages/mkgmap/trunk
Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-grass/packages/mkgmap/trunk
Package: mkgmap
Architecture: all
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, openjdk-6-jre-headless | java5-runtime-headless
+Depends: ${misc:Depends},
+ ${java:Depends},
+ default-jre | java6-runtime
Suggests: josm, qlandkarte
Description: Generate Garmin maps from OpenStreetMap data
This program converts OpenStreetMap data into a map that
Modified: packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/rules
===
--- packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/rules 2013-06-05 09:39:13 UTC (rev 3096)
+++ packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/rules 2013-06-05 09:41:00 UTC (rev 3097)
@@ -1,11 +1,8 @@
#!/usr/bin/make -f
-# debian/rules file for mkgmap (uses cdbs)
+# -*- makefile -*-
+# debian/rules file for mkgmap
+# Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
+# GPL
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/ant.mk
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk
-
-JAVA_HOME := /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/
-ANT_HOME := /usr/share/ant
-DEB_ANT_BUILD_TARGET := dist
-DEB_ANT_CLEAN_TARGET := clobber
+%:
+ dh $@ --with javahelper
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
r3099 - packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/patches
Author: tille
Date: 2013-06-05 14:51:04 + (Wed, 05 Jun 2013)
New Revision: 3099
Modified:
packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/patches/build_xml.patch
Log:
Problem with missing dependency libfastutil-java solved (ITP #711212);
remaining missing dependency:
https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd-tools/blob/master/OsmAndMapCreator/src/crosby/binary/Osmformat.java
Modified: packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/patches/build_xml.patch
===
--- packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/patches/build_xml.patch2013-06-05
12:45:00 UTC (rev 3098)
+++ packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/patches/build_xml.patch2013-06-05
14:51:04 UTC (rev 3099)
@@ -5,7 +5,11 @@
I went until the point when I noticed that mkgmap needs a
not yet packaged dependency
http://fastutil.di.unimi.it/
- I'm working on packaging this first.
+ The packaging of this predependency is finished and was ITPed (#711212)
+ When installing libfastutil-java the build as way less error messages.
+ It seems the remaining precondition would be at
+
https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd-tools/blob/master/OsmAndMapCreator/src/crosby/binary/Osmformat.java
+ I need to check this out
--- a/build.xml
+++ b/build.xml
@@ -22,7 +26,7 @@
!-- For class paths --
path id=compile.classpath
- fileset dir=${ivy.lib.dir}/compile /
-+ fileset dir= / !-- ${deblib}/jebl.jar --
++ fileset dir=${deblib}/ / !-- fastutil.jar --
/path
path id=test.classpath
fileset dir=${ivy.lib.dir}/test /
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
r3100 - packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian
Author: tille Date: 2013-06-05 14:52:26 + (Wed, 05 Jun 2013) New Revision: 3100 Modified: packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/changelog packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/rules Log: Forgot to commit fixed debian/rules; update debian/changelog about missing dependency Modified: packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/changelog === --- packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/changelog 2013-06-05 14:51:04 UTC (rev 3099) +++ packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/changelog 2013-06-05 14:52:26 UTC (rev 3100) @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ mkgmap (0.0.0+svn2640-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low - * NOT FINISHED! http://fastutil.di.unimi.it/ needs to be packaged first + * NOT FINISHED! https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd-tools/blob/master/OsmAndMapCreator/src/crosby/binary/Osmformat.java needs to be packaged first * Team upload. * New upstream version Closes: #580170 Modified: packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/rules === --- packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/rules 2013-06-05 14:51:04 UTC (rev 3099) +++ packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/rules 2013-06-05 14:52:26 UTC (rev 3100) @@ -4,5 +4,10 @@ # Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org # GPL +JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/default-java + %: dh $@ --with javahelper + +override_dh_auto_build: + ant ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
r3125 - packages/mkgmap/tarballs
Author: tille Date: 2014-01-24 15:06:37 + (Fri, 24 Jan 2014) New Revision: 3125 Removed: packages/mkgmap/tarballs/mkgmap_0.0.0+svn1067.orig.tar.gz packages/mkgmap/tarballs/mkgmap_0.0.0+svn630.orig.tar.gz Log: Save some space on Alioth and developers hard disks - we are migrating to Git anyway so there is not sense in keeping these very outdated files which are always available at snapshots.debian.org anyway Deleted: packages/mkgmap/tarballs/mkgmap_0.0.0+svn1067.orig.tar.gz === (Binary files differ) Deleted: packages/mkgmap/tarballs/mkgmap_0.0.0+svn630.orig.tar.gz === (Binary files differ) ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
r3126 - packages/mkgmap/trunk
Author: tille Date: 2014-01-24 15:09:37 + (Fri, 24 Jan 2014) New Revision: 3126 Removed: packages/mkgmap/trunk/debian/ Log: Migration to Git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
r3127 - packages/mkgmap/trunk
Author: tille Date: 2014-01-24 15:10:52 + (Fri, 24 Jan 2014) New Revision: 3127 Added: packages/mkgmap/trunk/README.status Log: Drop a note for those who might seek in SVN for the packaging stuff of mkgmap Added: packages/mkgmap/trunk/README.status === --- packages/mkgmap/trunk/README.status (rev 0) +++ packages/mkgmap/trunk/README.status 2014-01-24 15:10:52 UTC (rev 3127) @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +--- +Format: 1 +Status: git +SVNDeleteRevision: 3126 +URL: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-grass/mkgmap.git +Comment: + This package is now managed in a Git repository. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
r3143 - in packages/gpx2shp: . tags trunk
Author: tille Date: 2014-07-15 14:16:54 + (Tue, 15 Jul 2014) New Revision: 3143 Added: packages/gpx2shp/tags/ packages/gpx2shp/tags/0.69-4/ packages/gpx2shp/tags/0.70-1/ packages/gpx2shp/tags/0.71-1/ packages/gpx2shp/tags/0.71.0-1/ packages/gpx2shp/trunk/ packages/gpx2shp/trunk/debian/ Removed: packages/gpx2shp/0.69-4/ packages/gpx2shp/0.70-1/ packages/gpx2shp/0.71-1/ packages/gpx2shp/0.71.0-1/ packages/gpx2shp/debian/ Log: Move tags + trunk in policy conform dirs (otherwise it created trouble in machine-readable script for Blends) ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
r3148 - packages/mbsystem/trunk
Author: tille Date: 2015-08-20 08:42:58 + (Thu, 20 Aug 2015) New Revision: 3148 Added: packages/mbsystem/trunk/README.status Log: Add README.status to inform users about the move to Git Added: packages/mbsystem/trunk/README.status === --- packages/mbsystem/trunk/README.status (rev 0) +++ packages/mbsystem/trunk/README.status 2015-08-20 08:42:58 UTC (rev 3148) @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +--- +Format: 1 +Status: git +SVNDeleteRevision: 3147 +URL: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-grass/mbsystem.git +Comment: + This package is now managed in a Git repository. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
r3147 - packages/mbsystem/trunk
Author: tille Date: 2015-08-20 08:41:58 + (Thu, 20 Aug 2015) New Revision: 3147 Removed: packages/mbsystem/trunk/debian/ Log: Moved to git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
r3149 - packages/opencpn/trunk
Author: tille Date: 2018-02-22 18:33:38 + (Thu, 22 Feb 2018) New Revision: 3149 Removed: packages/opencpn/trunk/debian/ Log: Moved to Git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[otb] branch master updated (b5fb56f - db76f9e)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a change to branch master in repository otb. from b5fb56f Updated package new db76f9e Foy owner of change The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: debian/changelog | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/otb.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[otb] 01/01: Foy owner of change
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tille pushed a commit to branch master
in repository otb.
commit db76f9ea31003f113255ed95e02e0f24cc38d67f
Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
Date: Tue Oct 7 10:44:55 2014 +0200
Foy owner of change
---
debian/changelog | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index e9899b0..ee09f82 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ otb (4.2.1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
* debian/control: There is no point to have the package in contrib
* delete unused post{inst,rm} files
- [ root ]
+ [ Paolo Cavallini ]
* New upstream release.
-- Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:24:04 +
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on
/srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/otb.git
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[otb] branch master updated (db76f9e - e66b659)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tille pushed a change to branch master
in repository otb.
from db76f9e Foy owner of change
new de1ded2 cme fix dpkg-control
new e66b659 Drop libinsighttoolkit4.5 from explicite Depends since
the package does not exist any more and we should rather rely on
${shlibs:Depends}
The 2 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions
listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.
Summary of changes:
debian/control | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on
/srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/otb.git
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[otb] 02/02: Drop libinsighttoolkit4.5 from explicite Depends since the package does not exist any more and we should rather rely on ${shlibs:Depends}
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tille pushed a commit to branch master
in repository otb.
commit e66b659d22f86ed33ba7851852af03a9d3dd0c0d
Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
Date: Tue Oct 7 10:48:23 2014 +0200
Drop libinsighttoolkit4.5 from explicite Depends since the package does not
exist any more and we should rather rely on ${shlibs:Depends}
---
debian/control | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index bdb3f7c..c78ff6b 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -35,8 +35,7 @@ Homepage: http://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/
Package: libotb
Architecture: any
Section: libs
-Depends: libinsighttoolkit4.5,
- libgdal1h,
+Depends: libgdal1h,
${shlibs:Depends},
${misc:Depends}
Suggests: libotb-dev
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on
/srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/otb.git
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[otb] 01/02: cme fix dpkg-control
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a commit to branch master in repository otb. commit de1ded26623ba88f0899221fd6e1b4afc243ba38 Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Tue Oct 7 10:47:58 2014 +0200 cme fix dpkg-control --- debian/control | 7 --- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 296f3f5..bdb3f7c 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ Source: otb Maintainer: Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org -Uploaders: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it +Uploaders: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org, + Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it Section: science Priority: optional Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9), @@ -26,8 +27,8 @@ Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9), libopencv-dev, libossim-dev, libfftw3-dev -Standards-Version: 3.9.5 -Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-grass/otb.git +Standards-Version: 3.9.6 +Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/otb.git Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-grass/otb.git Homepage: http://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/ -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/otb.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[otb] branch master updated (e66b659 - c30cb26)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tille pushed a change to branch master
in repository otb.
from e66b659 Drop libinsighttoolkit4.5 from explicite Depends since
the package does not exist any more and we should rather rely on
${shlibs:Depends}
new c30cb26 Refresh spelling patches
The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions
listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.
Summary of changes:
debian/patches/series | 2 +-
debian/patches/spelling.patch | 326 +++---
2 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on
/srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/otb.git
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[otb] 01/01: Refresh spelling patches
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tille pushed a commit to branch master
in repository otb.
commit c30cb266a6419c3cdaa27a3cd68575cb9d4ad93f
Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
Date: Tue Oct 7 13:31:04 2014 +0200
Refresh spelling patches
---
debian/patches/series | 2 +-
debian/patches/spelling.patch | 326 +++---
2 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index 1b1fd8a..5299247 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -1 +1 @@
-#spelling.patch
+spelling.patch
diff --git a/debian/patches/spelling.patch b/debian/patches/spelling.patch
index 6343450..2e9494c 100644
--- a/debian/patches/spelling.patch
+++ b/debian/patches/spelling.patch
@@ -5,9 +5,9 @@ Description: Fix some spelling errors to silence lintian
enabling
.
Feel free to take over this s/allows to/allows one to/.
otb.orig/Applications/Classification/otbTrainImagesClassifier.cxx
-+++ otb/Applications/Classification/otbTrainImagesClassifier.cxx
-@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
+--- a/Applications/Classification/otbTrainImagesClassifier.cxx
b/Applications/Classification/otbTrainImagesClassifier.cxx
+@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ void TrainImagesClassifier::DoInit()
Samples are composed of pixel values in each band optionally centered
and reduced using an XML statistics file produced by
the ComputeImagesStatistics application.\n The training vector data must
contain polygons with a positive integer field
representing the class label. The name of this field can be set using
the \Class label field\ parameter. Training and validation
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Description: Fix some spelling errors to silence lintian
enabling
between the number of samples in training and validation sets. Two
parameters allow to manage the size of the training and
validation sets per class and per image.\n Several classifier parameters
can be set depending on the chosen classifier. In the
validation process, the confusion matrix is organized the following way:
rows = reference labels, columns = produced labels.
-@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
+@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ void TrainImagesClassifier::DoInit()
//Group IO
AddParameter(ParameterType_Group, io, Input and output data);
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Description: Fix some spelling errors to silence lintian
enabling
AddParameter(ParameterType_InputImageList, io.il, Input Image List);
SetParameterDescription(io.il, A list of input images.);
AddParameter(ParameterType_InputVectorDataList, io.vd, Input Vector Data
List);
-@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
+@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ void TrainImagesClassifier::DoInit()
//Group Sample list
AddParameter(ParameterType_Group, sample, Training and validation
samples parameters);
SetParameterDescription(sample,
@@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ Description: Fix some spelling errors to silence lintian
enabling
AddParameter(ParameterType_Int, sample.mt, Maximum training sample size
per class);
//MandatoryOff(mt);
otb.orig/Applications/Classification/otbTrainKNN.cxx
-+++ otb/Applications/Classification/otbTrainKNN.cxx
-@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
+--- a/Applications/Classification/otbTrainKNN.cxx
b/Applications/Classification/otbTrainKNN.cxx
+@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ namespace Wrapper
void TrainImagesClassifier::InitKNNParams()
{
AddChoice(classifier.knn, KNN classifier);
@@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ Description: Fix some spelling errors to silence lintian
enabling
See complete documentation here
\\url{http://docs.opencv.org/modules/ml/doc/k_nearest_neighbors.html}.;);
//K parameter
otb.orig/Applications/Classification/otbTrainNeuralNetwork.cxx
-+++ otb/Applications/Classification/otbTrainNeuralNetwork.cxx
-@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
+--- a/Applications/Classification/otbTrainNeuralNetwork.cxx
b/Applications/Classification/otbTrainNeuralNetwork.cxx
+@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ void TrainImagesClassifier::InitNeuralNe
{
AddChoice(classifier.ann, Artificial Neural Network classifier);
SetParameterDescription(classifier.ann,
@@ -56,9 +56,9 @@ Description: Fix some spelling errors to silence lintian
enabling
See complete documentation here
\\url{http://docs.opencv.org/modules/ml/doc/neural_networks.html}.;);
//TrainMethod
otb.orig/Applications/Classification/otbTrainBoost.cxx
-+++ otb/Applications/Classification/otbTrainBoost.cxx
-@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
+--- a/Applications/Classification/otbTrainBoost.cxx
b/Applications/Classification/otbTrainBoost.cxx
+@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ namespace Wrapper
void TrainImagesClassifier::InitBoostParams()
{
AddChoice(classifier.boost, Boost classifier);
@@ -67,9 +67,9 @@ Description: Fix some spelling errors to silence lintian
enabling
See complete documentation here
\\url{http://docs.opencv.org/modules/ml/doc/boosting.html}.;);
//BoostType
AddParameter
[otb] branch master updated (c30cb26 - 35de616)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a change to branch master in repository otb. from c30cb26 Refresh spelling patches new e899dec Build against Debian packaged libtinyxml (thanks for the hint to Rashad M mohammedrasha...@gmail.com) new 35de616 Override lintian error about embedded-library openjpeg since currently the available openjpeg versions in Debian are not compatible The 2 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: debian/changelog| 4 debian/control | 3 ++- debian/libotb.lintian-overrides | 6 ++ debian/rules| 3 ++- 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 debian/libotb.lintian-overrides -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/otb.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[otb] 01/01: Install libraries directly to /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib/otb. Attention: Next commit that needs to be tested will enable multiarch.
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a commit to branch master in repository otb. commit 32aa22a1db22f3da16797d3574493a107bfe116b Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Wed Oct 8 20:56:43 2014 +0200 Install libraries directly to /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib/otb. Attention: Next commit that needs to be tested will enable multiarch. --- debian/libotb-dev.install | 6 +++--- debian/libotb.install | 6 +++--- debian/libotb.lintian-overrides | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/libotb-dev.install b/debian/libotb-dev.install index 6cdfed2..6fcd4ba 100644 --- a/debian/libotb-dev.install +++ b/debian/libotb-dev.install @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # OTB libraries (symlinks) -usr/lib/otb/libotb*.so -usr/lib/otb/libOTB[A-V]*.so -usr/lib/otb/libsiftfast.so +usr/lib/otb/libotb*.so usr/lib +usr/lib/otb/libOTB[A-V]*.sousr/lib +usr/lib/otb/libsiftfast.so usr/lib # OTB headers usr/include/otb diff --git a/debian/libotb.install b/debian/libotb.install index ec8eeda..c4b2cb7 100644 --- a/debian/libotb.install +++ b/debian/libotb.install @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # OTB libraries (binaries and versioned symlinks) -usr/lib/otb/libotb*.so.* -usr/lib/otb/libOTB[A-V]*.so.* -usr/lib/otb/libsiftfast.so.* +usr/lib/otb/libotb*.so.* usr/lib +usr/lib/otb/libOTB[A-V]*.so.* usr/lib +usr/lib/otb/libsiftfast.so.* usr/lib # Executables usr/bin/otbTestDriver diff --git a/debian/libotb.lintian-overrides b/debian/libotb.lintian-overrides index 804edb4..1f0ab62 100644 --- a/debian/libotb.lintian-overrides +++ b/debian/libotb.lintian-overrides @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ # packaged libopenjpeg. The discussion thread about this starts # here: # https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2014/10/msg00066.html -libotb: embedded-library usr/lib/otb/libotbopenjpeg.so..1.0: openjpeg +libotb: embedded-library usr/lib*libotbopenjpeg.so*: openjpeg -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/otb.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[otb] 01/01: Install libraries to DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tille pushed a commit to branch master
in repository otb.
commit 2913621e23cc85aacbd0c58bf3cf41d1f9a0fb8a
Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
Date: Fri Oct 10 06:16:47 2014 +0200
Install libraries to DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH
---
debian/control| 1 +
debian/libotb-dev.install | 5 ++---
debian/libotb.install | 5 ++---
debian/otb-bin-qt.install | 4 +++-
debian/otb-bin.install| 3 ++-
debian/rules | 18 ++
6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 5a8cb3e..857481e 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ Section: science
Priority: optional
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9),
dpkg-dev (= 1.16.1~),
+ dh-exec,
cmake (= 2.8.3),
libinsighttoolkit4-dev,
libgdal-dev (= 1.10.0),
diff --git a/debian/libotb-dev.install b/debian/libotb-dev.install
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
index 6fcd4ba..0447e46
--- a/debian/libotb-dev.install
+++ b/debian/libotb-dev.install
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
+#! /usr/bin/dh-exec
# OTB libraries (symlinks)
-usr/lib/otb/libotb*.so usr/lib
-usr/lib/otb/libOTB[A-V]*.sousr/lib
-usr/lib/otb/libsiftfast.so usr/lib
+usr/lib/otb/lib*.sousr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}
# OTB headers
usr/include/otb
diff --git a/debian/libotb.install b/debian/libotb.install
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
index c4b2cb7..fbb819a
--- a/debian/libotb.install
+++ b/debian/libotb.install
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
+#! /usr/bin/dh-exec
# OTB libraries (binaries and versioned symlinks)
-usr/lib/otb/libotb*.so.* usr/lib
-usr/lib/otb/libOTB[A-V]*.so.* usr/lib
-usr/lib/otb/libsiftfast.so.* usr/lib
+usr/lib/otb/lib*.so.* usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}
# Executables
usr/bin/otbTestDriver
diff --git a/debian/otb-bin-qt.install b/debian/otb-bin-qt.install
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
index 9a18835..b26ce0d
--- a/debian/otb-bin-qt.install
+++ b/debian/otb-bin-qt.install
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
+#! /usr/bin/dh-exec
+
# OTB specific libraries (binaries and all symlinks)
-usr/lib/otb/libOTBWrapperQtWidget.so*
+usr/lib/otb/libOTBWrapperQtWidget.so* usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}
# Executables
usr/bin/otbApplicationLauncherQt
diff --git a/debian/otb-bin.install b/debian/otb-bin.install
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
index a6dd81c..076ccb6
--- a/debian/otb-bin.install
+++ b/debian/otb-bin.install
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
+#! /usr/bin/dh-exec
# OTB specific libraries (binaries and all symlinks)
-usr/lib/otb/libOTBWrapperCommandLine.so*
+usr/lib/otb/libOTBWrapperCommandLine.so* usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}
# Executables
usr/bin/otbApplicationLauncherCommandLine
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 6796c3e..96984f6 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -48,12 +48,17 @@ CMAKE_FLAGS = \
-DOTB_WRAP_PYTHON:BOOL=ON \
-DOTB_USE_EXTERNAL_TINYXML:BOOL=ON
-pkgcli:=otb-bin
-pkggui:=otb-bin-qt
+DEBPKGNAME := $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog | awk '/^Source:/ {print $$2}')
+pkgcli:=$(DEBPKGNAME)-bin
+pkggui:=$(DEBPKGNAME)-bin-qt
+pkglib:=lib$(DEBPKGNAME)
+pkgdev:=$(pkglib)-dev
mancli:=$(CURDIR)/debian/$(pkgcli)/usr/share/man/man1
mangui:=$(CURDIR)/debian/$(pkggui)/usr/share/man/man1
-OTB_LIB_DIRS = /usr/lib/otb
+# OTB_LIB_DIRS = $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)
+# rather use all libs since the installed libs are spread over several packages
+OTB_LIB_DIRS = $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/otb
%:
dh $@ --parallel
@@ -62,7 +67,12 @@ override_dh_auto_configure:
dh_auto_configure -- $(CMAKE_FLAGS)
override_dh_shlibdeps:
- LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(LD_LIBRARY_PATH):$(OTB_LIB_DIRS) dh_shlibdeps
+ dh_shlibdeps -l$(OTB_LIB_DIRS)
+
+override_dh_install:
+ dh_install
+ rm -f
$(CURDIR)/debian/$(pkglib)/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/libOTBWrapper*
+ rm -f
$(CURDIR)/debian/$(pkgdev)/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/libOTBWrapper*
override_dh_installman:
mkdir -p $(mancli)
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on
/srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/otb.git
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#764860: ITP: otb -- ORFEO Toolbox
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org * Package name: otb Version : 4.2.1 Upstream Author : OTB Team cont...@orfeo-toolbox.org * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/orfeo-toolbox/files/OTB/ * License : CeCILL Programming Lang: C++ Description : ORFEO Toolbox ORFEO Toolbox (OTB) is distributed as an open source library of image processing algorithms. OTB is based on the medical image processing library ITK and offers particular functionalities for remote sensing image processing in general and for high spatial resolution images in particular. This package was derived from some PPA version and polished in cooperation with upstream. It will be maintained by the Debian GIS team at git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-grass/otb.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Pristine-tar is missing
Hi, could you please commit the pristine-tar branch? Thanks Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: otb_4.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Paolo, On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 07:23:18AM +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote: Il 15/10/2014 14:52, Johan Van de Wauw ha scritto: You can use licensecheck in the package devscripts to check which licenses are used and update the debian/copyright file. https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ Just running it myself I wonder if you are using the copies of libraries (eg boost, zlib, ...) FYI: I added a ticket upstream, where I think the issue is best solved http://bugs.orfeo-toolbox.org/view.php?id=981 While this is probably correct, it is only half of the problem. Ftpmaster found *several other* files with licenses / copyright which are not mentioned in debian/copyright. This needs to be fixed before we could upload again. The code copies would be acceptable to some extend if there would be no way around - if and only if their copyright would be properly specified. So somebody needs to go down the list which can be obtained by licensecheck -r * Hope this helps Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[avce00] branch upstream updated (aae1289 - 0ea768a)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a change to branch upstream in repository avce00. from aae1289 Imported Upstream version 2.0.0 new 0ea768a Imported Upstream version 2.0.0 The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/avce00.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[avce00] 01/01: Imported Upstream version 2.0.0
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a commit to branch upstream in repository avce00. commit 0ea768a81be520fc5cd4120d7ec2db33030dc6ab Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Wed Oct 22 08:24:13 2014 +0200 Imported Upstream version 2.0.0 -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/avce00.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[avce00] branch pristine-tar created (now bcc23b2)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a change to branch pristine-tar in repository avce00. at bcc23b2 pristine-tar data for avce00_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz This branch includes the following new commits: new bcc23b2 pristine-tar data for avce00_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/avce00.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[avce00] 01/01: pristine-tar data for avce00_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a commit to branch pristine-tar in repository avce00. commit bcc23b21a6e17b214fdcc839c7336a2a7b688a3c Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Wed Oct 22 08:24:13 2014 +0200 pristine-tar data for avce00_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz --- avce00_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz.delta | Bin 0 - 2161 bytes avce00_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz.id| 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/avce00_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz.delta b/avce00_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz.delta new file mode 100644 index 000..9ea36f3 Binary files /dev/null and b/avce00_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz.delta differ diff --git a/avce00_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz.id b/avce00_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz.id new file mode 100644 index 000..d4b48ee --- /dev/null +++ b/avce00_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz.id @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +d20266e4609a8633a52dcc53cb1df5f26c2f0133 -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/avce00.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Did anybody just upload avce00?
Hi Johan, thanks for your preparation. I injected pristine-tar and tried to upload but got: $ dput avce00_2.0.0-3_amd64.changes Uploading avce00 using ftp to ftp-master (host: ftp.upload.debian.org; directory: /pub/UploadQueue/) running allowed-distribution: check whether a local profile permits uploads to the target distribution running protected-distribution: warn before uploading to distributions where a special policy applies running checksum: verify checksums before uploading running suite-mismatch: check the target distribution for common errors running check-debs: makes sure the upload contains a binary package running gpg: check GnuPG signatures before the upload gpg: Unterschrift vom Mi 22 Okt 2014 08:26:18 CEST mittels RSA-Schlüssel ID D1C646D1 gpg: Korrekte Unterschrift von Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org gpg: alias Andreas Tille til...@rki.de gpg: alias Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu gpg: alias Andreas Tille til...@gmail.com gpg: alias Andreas Tille andr...@fam-tille.de gpg: alias [jpeg image of size 4279] Uploading avce00_2.0.0-3.dsc Upload permissions error You either don't have the rights to upload a file, or, if this is on ftp-master, you may have tried to overwrite a file already on the server. Continuing anyway in case you want to recover from an incomplete upload. No file was uploaded, however. Uploading avce00_2.0.0-3.debian.tar.xz Upload permissions error You either don't have the rights to upload a file, or, if this is on ftp-master, you may have tried to overwrite a file already on the server. Continuing anyway in case you want to recover from an incomplete upload. No file was uploaded, however. Uploading avce00_2.0.0-3_amd64.deb Uploading avce00_2.0.0-3_amd64.changes ??? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: otb_4.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Paolo, can you please confirm that you understood that it is a packaging problem to simply list all the license in the debian/copyright file? Ftpmaster was not saying that the licenses are wrong - they are just not specified in d/copyright. Kind regards Andreas. On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:03:15AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Paolo, On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 07:23:18AM +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote: Il 15/10/2014 14:52, Johan Van de Wauw ha scritto: You can use licensecheck in the package devscripts to check which licenses are used and update the debian/copyright file. https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ Just running it myself I wonder if you are using the copies of libraries (eg boost, zlib, ...) FYI: I added a ticket upstream, where I think the issue is best solved http://bugs.orfeo-toolbox.org/view.php?id=981 While this is probably correct, it is only half of the problem. Ftpmaster found *several other* files with licenses / copyright which are not mentioned in debian/copyright. This needs to be fixed before we could upload again. The code copies would be acceptable to some extend if there would be no way around - if and only if their copyright would be properly specified. So somebody needs to go down the list which can be obtained by licensecheck -r * Hope this helps Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Libjpeg trouble in jmapviewer
Hi Felix, unfortunately there is some conflict in the Build-Depends: 0 packages upgraded, 132 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 62.8 MB/92.4 MB of archives. After unpacking 210 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts: libjpeg62 but 1:1.3.1-8 is to be installed. libjpeg62 : Depends: libjpeg62-turbo (= 1:1.3.1-8) but 1:1.3.1-10 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
Hi Bas, On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:10:43PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: [no love for enigmail today] try mutt ;-) switched to public discussion anyway. For very strange reasons I get 0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 37.7 MB/115 MB of archives. After unpacking 491 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: libgdal-dev (= 1.11.0-1~) but 1.10.1+dfsg-8+b3 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: and yes, I have experimental sources.list enabled in my pbuilder environment and updated cowbuilder. I vaguely remember that we had such a case before but I forgot how we solved this. Thanks for the preparation Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
Hi Bas On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: It looks like your experimental branch is outdated, gdal-grass 1.11.1 build depends on libgdal-dev (= 1.11.1-1~). Pulling the experimental branch should suffice to fix this specific issue: git fetch origin git checkout experimental git pull I did so: $ git log commit 4b4b0f7a63c8d35f86489e9ed515372dc35ef650 Author: Bas Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl Date: Sun Oct 12 16:17:07 2014 +0200 Set distribution to experimental. commit 076103ba71effe043ea0bec659ae1784ddfe6cea Author: Bas Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl Date: Sat Oct 11 18:10:43 2014 +0200 Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6, no changes. ... $ git branch * experimental master pristine-tar upstream Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the libjpeg62-turbo unmet build dependency, so it cannot be built at the moment. ... so we can keep on sorting out since the problem seems to remain. 0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 36.9 MB/115 MB of archives. After unpacking 491 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: libgdal-dev (= 1.11.1-1~) but 1.10.1+dfsg-8+b3 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: I even fetched a fresh clone via gbp-clone and did the steps you suggested above. :-( Thanks for your all your sponsorship efforts. I admit I'm waiting for the time when three or four of you new activists in Debian GIS will become DM. I also tried to encourage Ross and Johan to apply. You all do pretty good work and it is time to gain the official status. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[libgeotiff-dfsg] branch upstream updated (5d8800f - 6228073)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a change to branch upstream in repository libgeotiff-dfsg. from 5d8800f Imported Upstream version 1.4.0 new 6228073 Imported Upstream version 1.4.0 The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/libgeotiff-dfsg.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[libgeotiff-dfsg] 01/01: pristine-tar data for libgeotiff-dfsg_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a commit to branch pristine-tar in repository libgeotiff-dfsg. commit 888c10a7d2726ec1da114a36dbdc12a6899c2455 Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Fri Oct 24 08:37:49 2014 +0200 pristine-tar data for libgeotiff-dfsg_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz --- libgeotiff-dfsg_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz.delta | Bin 0 - 3476 bytes libgeotiff-dfsg_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz.id| 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/libgeotiff-dfsg_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz.delta b/libgeotiff-dfsg_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz.delta new file mode 100644 index 000..ae0ae1b Binary files /dev/null and b/libgeotiff-dfsg_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz.delta differ diff --git a/libgeotiff-dfsg_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz.id b/libgeotiff-dfsg_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz.id new file mode 100644 index 000..dd9690d --- /dev/null +++ b/libgeotiff-dfsg_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz.id @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +191701ea4510ee8843f4cb5d2e63a31942b81ffb -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/libgeotiff-dfsg.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[libgeotiff-dfsg] 01/01: Imported Upstream version 1.4.0
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a commit to branch upstream in repository libgeotiff-dfsg. commit 6228073bf91467d68636f84c9eada300211408e4 Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Fri Oct 24 08:37:48 2014 +0200 Imported Upstream version 1.4.0 -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/libgeotiff-dfsg.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#766508: Libjpeg trouble in jmapviewer
Hi, I just uploaded jmapviewer. Unfortunately the problem with gdal-grass remains. Kind regards Andreas. On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 08:59:21PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote: Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes: Hi Felix, hello Andreas, unfortunately there is some conflict in the Build-Depends: 0 packages upgraded, 132 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 62.8 MB/92.4 MB of archives. After unpacking 210 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts: libjpeg62 but 1:1.3.1-8 is to be installed. libjpeg62 : Depends: libjpeg62-turbo (= 1:1.3.1-8) but 1:1.3.1-10 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: This is a problem with installing openjdk-7-jre (which is pulled from default-jdk): https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766483 It has nothing to do with jmapviewer (except that jmapviewer depends on default-jdk). I'm not sure whether an update will already fix that problem :-( time allows maybe you should sponsor other packages and try again tomorrow? If the time until the freeze is pressing, I could ask for a workaround on debian-java. Thanks and Best Regards, -- Felix Natter -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:15:43AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 10/23/2014 11:36 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the libjpeg62-turbo unmet build dependency, so it cannot be built at the moment. ... so we can keep on sorting out since the problem seems to remain. 0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 36.9 MB/115 MB of archives. After unpacking 491 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: libgdal-dev (= 1.11.1-1~) but 1.10.1+dfsg-8+b3 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: I even fetched a fresh clone via gbp-clone and did the steps you suggested above. :-( The git repo looks good, and the version in the unmet Depends too. I cannot reproduce this problem with my sid+experimental chroot which is setup like yours as described in: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2014-September/021973.html Interestingly here apt reports 229 newly installed, yours one less. I've attached my build log for comparison. Did you find out what the missing package on your build was? No, I need to find the diff of the build log (since lacking a better idea) but I can't do this right now. Hope to manage this later this afternoon. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
Hi Bas, On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:21AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 10/24/2014 11:03 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: -Need to get 35.1 MB/116 MB of archives. After unpacking 494 MB will be used. -The following packages have unmet dependencies: - libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts: libjpeg62 but 1:1.3.1-8 is to be installed. - libjpeg62 : Depends: libjpeg62-turbo (= 1:1.3.1-8) but 1:1.3.1-10 is to be installed. -Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... This seems to be caused by gdal 1.11.1 in experimental not having been rebuilt for the jpeg-turbo transition. Seems this transition creates some trouble (and by chance I had a talk to the libjpeg developer last weekend who thinks it is a really unfortunate move - but that's another topic). I've just filed a binnmu bug to have it rebuilt (#766694). As usual ping me once I should retry the build (even if stuff in experimental should not be that urgent). Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[gis] branch master updated (835fe02 - d7ef1f5)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a change to branch master in repository gis. from 835fe02 Update debian/control. new d7ef1f5 Really add source format 3.0 (native) as written in changelog The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: debian/source/format | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) create mode 100644 debian/source/format -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/gis.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[gis] 01/01: Really add source format 3.0 (native) as written in changelog
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a commit to branch master in repository gis. commit d7ef1f579cbba09cd27cf36b07c8a1e779dd5174 Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Mon Oct 27 07:05:59 2014 +0100 Really add source format 3.0 (native) as written in changelog --- debian/source/format | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/debian/source/format b/debian/source/format new file mode 100644 index 000..89ae9db --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/source/format @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +3.0 (native) -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/gis.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[gis] tag debian/0.0.3 created (now fe51eca)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a change to tag debian/0.0.3 in repository gis. at fe51eca (commit) No new revisions were added by this update. -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/gis.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[gis] 04/04: Update changelog timestamp
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a commit to branch master in repository gis. commit fe51eca94aa696f81ed422ccc179d08b24d46ab7 Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Mon Oct 27 07:23:45 2014 +0100 Update changelog timestamp --- debian/changelog | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index f1c1e23..05a3368 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ debian-gis (0.0.3) unstable; urgency=low Closes: #757580 * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6, no changes. - -- Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:02:47 +0200 + -- Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:23:26 +0100 debian-gis (0.0.2) unstable; urgency=low -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/gis.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[gis] branch master updated (d7ef1f5 - fe51eca)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a change to branch master in repository gis. from d7ef1f5 Really add source format 3.0 (native) as written in changelog new 46e1638 Run make dist new 7c23af2 Add missing , new 650848f Rerun make dist new fe51eca Update changelog timestamp The 4 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: debian-gis-tasks.desc | 6 ++ debian/changelog | 4 ++-- debian/control| 17 + tasks/devel | 2 +- 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/gis.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[gis] 01/04: Run make dist
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tille pushed a commit to branch master
in repository gis.
commit 46e1638aad86b1207ed979d41242b2a84283fcfa
Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
Date: Mon Oct 27 07:14:16 2014 +0100
Run make dist
---
debian-gis-tasks.desc | 4
debian/changelog | 2 +-
debian/control| 12 ++--
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian-gis-tasks.desc b/debian-gis-tasks.desc
index 604cbcc..b3e6863 100644
--- a/debian-gis-tasks.desc
+++ b/debian-gis-tasks.desc
@@ -178,6 +178,8 @@ Packages: list
libossim1
libossim-dev
dans-gdal-scripts
+ doris
+ snaphu
python-pyresample
python-pykdtree
python-pyorbital
@@ -222,6 +224,7 @@ Packages: list
mapserver-bin
cgi-mapserver
python-mapscript
+ tinyows
routino-www
mapcache-tools
libapache2-mod-mapcache
@@ -270,6 +273,7 @@ Packages: list
libjts-java
libgeo-point-perl
geotiff-bin
+ libgeotiff-epsg
liblas-bin
rasterlite-bin
osgearth
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index f10d0a4..f1c1e23 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-debian-gis (0.0.3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+debian-gis (0.0.3) unstable; urgency=low
[ Andreas Tille ]
* tasks/statistics: Add some prospective R packes that reside in
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 984d3c5..64a5f19 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ Section: metapackages
Architecture: all
Depends: gis-tasks (= ${binary:Version})
Recommends: dans-gdal-scripts,
+ doris,
gdal-bin,
libepr-api2-dev,
libgdal-dev,
@@ -219,11 +220,11 @@ Recommends: dans-gdal-scripts,
python-pycoast,
python-pykdtree,
python-pyorbital,
- python-pyresample
+ python-pyresample,
+ snaphu
Suggests: adore-doris,
best,
bestgui,
- doris,
eolisa,
getorb,
giant,
@@ -245,7 +246,6 @@ Suggests: adore-doris,
pyaps,
python-bufr,
roipac,
- snaphu,
varres
Description: Remote sensing and earth observation
Debian packages which are dealing with Remote Sensing (for instance
@@ -289,14 +289,14 @@ Recommends: cgi-mapserver,
tilecache,
tilelite,
tilestache,
+ tinyows,
twms
Suggests: mapcache-cgi,
musmap,
pycsw-cgi,
python-pycsw,
pywps,
- tilemill,
- tinyows
+ tilemill
Description: Present geographic information via web map server
Debian packages which are dealing with geographical information
to be presented for the web on so called map tile servers. These
@@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ Recommends: avce00,
libgeo-point-perl,
libgeographic-dev,
libgeos-c1,
+ libgeotiff-epsg,
libjts-java,
liblas-bin,
libshp-dev,
@@ -362,7 +363,6 @@ Suggests: capaware,
libgdal1-1.10.1-grass,
libgdal1-1.11.1-grass,
libgeo-proj4-perl,
- libgeotiff-epsg,
libkml-java,
libspatialite3,
mapnik-viewer,
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on
/srv/git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/gis.git
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[gis] 02/04: Add missing ,
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a commit to branch master in repository gis. commit 7c23af279c7a44ce16a863dfa45ea8e90714429c Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Mon Oct 27 07:20:46 2014 +0100 Add missing , --- tasks/devel | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tasks/devel b/tasks/devel index 84faccb..3dd9ba6 100644 --- a/tasks/devel +++ b/tasks/devel @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ Depends: libepr-api2-dev, \ libshp-dev, \ libspatialindex-dev, \ libspatialite-dev, \ - libgeo-proj4-perl \ + libgeo-proj4-perl, \ pktools-dev X-Comment: Packages maintained by the Debian GIS Project -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/gis.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[gis] 03/04: Rerun make dist
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a commit to branch master in repository gis. commit 650848fd1e5bdfef1d780a818476fd698d75bb2c Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Mon Oct 27 07:21:54 2014 +0100 Rerun make dist --- debian-gis-tasks.desc | 2 ++ debian/control| 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian-gis-tasks.desc b/debian-gis-tasks.desc index b3e6863..404d7b0 100644 --- a/debian-gis-tasks.desc +++ b/debian-gis-tasks.desc @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ Packages: list libshp-dev libspatialindex-dev libspatialite-dev + libgeo-proj4-perl + pktools-dev ruby-hdfeos5 ruby-netcdf python-liblas diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 64a5f19..339f423 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ Recommends: grass-dev, libgeo-google-mapobject-perl, libgeo-googleearth-pluggable-perl, libgeo-gpx-perl, + libgeo-proj4-perl, libgeographic-dev, libgeoip-dev, libgeos-dev, @@ -102,13 +103,13 @@ Recommends: grass-dev, libterralib-dev, libudunits2-dev, paraview-dev, + pktools-dev, python-geohash, python-liblas, python-modestmaps, ruby-hdfeos5, ruby-netcdf -Suggests: libgeo-proj4-perl pktools-dev, - libkmlframework-java, +Suggests: libkmlframework-java, liblaszip-dev, libosmgpsmap-1.0-dev Description: Geographic Information Systems (GIS) development -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/gis.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[otb] 01/01: Add ITP bug to close
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a commit to branch master in repository otb. commit 852e5cc0b75ed27c36e15a283860b47ce9c4a7e5 Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Tue Oct 28 18:24:52 2014 +0100 Add ITP bug to close --- debian/changelog | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index c023df5..4f451cd 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ otb (4.2.1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium [ Andreas Tille ] - * Initial upload by Debian GIS team + * Initial upload to Debian mirror (Closes: #764860) * Add Debian GIS team as maintainer * debian/control: Priority from extra to optional * cme fix dpkg-control -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/otb.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[otb] branch master updated (a019c6b - 852e5cc)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a change to branch master in repository otb. from a019c6b Add more files to d/copyright new 852e5cc Add ITP bug to close The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: debian/changelog | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/otb.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[otb] branch master updated (852e5cc - 7491ba3)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a change to branch master in repository otb. from 852e5cc Add ITP bug to close new 7491ba3 Add some examples for Files-Excluded The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: debian/copyright | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/otb.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[ossim] branch upstream updated (4a56037 - e82af5e)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a change to branch upstream in repository ossim. from 4a56037 Imported Upstream version 1.8.16 new e82af5e Imported Upstream version 1.8.16 The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/ossim.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[ossim] 01/01: Imported Upstream version 1.8.16
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a commit to branch upstream in repository ossim. commit e82af5eb8793468b68d1cf9ae590aa039010cb05 Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Sun Nov 2 20:39:01 2014 +0100 Imported Upstream version 1.8.16 -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/ossim.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[ossim] branch pristine-tar created (now 3e50364)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a change to branch pristine-tar in repository ossim. at 3e50364 pristine-tar data for ossim_1.8.16.orig.tar.gz This branch includes the following new commits: new 3e50364 pristine-tar data for ossim_1.8.16.orig.tar.gz The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/ossim.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[ossim] 01/01: pristine-tar data for ossim_1.8.16.orig.tar.gz
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a commit to branch pristine-tar in repository ossim. commit 3e503645eda2668870d2e4d362c0247b4f8065fe Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Sun Nov 2 20:39:03 2014 +0100 pristine-tar data for ossim_1.8.16.orig.tar.gz --- ossim_1.8.16.orig.tar.gz.delta | Bin 0 - 103138 bytes ossim_1.8.16.orig.tar.gz.id| 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/ossim_1.8.16.orig.tar.gz.delta b/ossim_1.8.16.orig.tar.gz.delta new file mode 100644 index 000..ee52b8a Binary files /dev/null and b/ossim_1.8.16.orig.tar.gz.delta differ diff --git a/ossim_1.8.16.orig.tar.gz.id b/ossim_1.8.16.orig.tar.gz.id new file mode 100644 index 000..5bdf6cb --- /dev/null +++ b/ossim_1.8.16.orig.tar.gz.id @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +c9334733b6aa953127cf129a7feb494e2adfc076 -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/ossim.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 06:17:12PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Can you try libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1 once more now that the buildds are done with gdal? Done Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[gis] 01/01: Add alacarte
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a commit to branch master in repository gis. commit 91ba8810d93b040313221809a6219bfc69030abd Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Fri Nov 14 10:38:49 2014 +0100 Add alacarte --- tasks/osm | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/tasks/osm b/tasks/osm index 7b77289..0287873 100644 --- a/tasks/osm +++ b/tasks/osm @@ -138,3 +138,4 @@ WNPP: 744842 Depends: sosi2osm +Depends: alacarte -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/gis.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[gis] branch master updated (61e0e76 - 91ba881)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tille pushed a change to branch master in repository gis. from 61e0e76 Add python-affine to workstation task. new 91ba881 Add alacarte The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: tasks/osm | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/gis.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#769237: mipp: FTBFS in jessie/i386: Tests failures
Hi, as I wrote on the bottom of the SoB page please consider me on vacation. Thanks Andreas. On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 06:19:12PM +0100, Antonio Valentino wrote: Hi Ross, hi Lucas, On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 22:51:18 +0100 Ross Gammon r...@the-gammons.net wrote: On 11/14/2014 09:26 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: I will try once more to build from source in a Jessie VM. I would like to understand what is going on here. $ apt-get source mipp # apt-get build-dep mipp $ apt-get --build source mipp Works fine in a freshly created Jessie VM. This issue seems to be related to a precision issue that is triggered only in particular cases. I have just pushed to the git repository of (git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/mipp.git) of the package a fix for this issue bacported from upstream. Can you please let me know if it works for you? I can't reproduce the issue on my laptop. cheers -- Antonio Valentino -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Patches for debian-gis meta packages
Hi,
I have patched debian-gis package source to let it work with cdd-dev
nicely. It required some changes to cdd-dev which are in version
0.4.4 which will be uploaded today (so find it tomorrow in sid or grab
it from svn).
The attached diff contains the suggested changes. Feel free to ask
in case of any question.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
diff -urbN debian-gis.orig/Makefile debian-gis/Makefile
--- debian-gis.orig/Makefile 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ debian-gis/Makefile 2007-08-24 13:34:46.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+#!/usr/bin/make -f
+
+include /usr/share/cdd-dev/Makefile
diff -urbN debian-gis.orig/common/common debian-gis/common/common
--- debian-gis.orig/common/common 2007-10-20 11:13:38.0 +0200
+++ debian-gis/common/common 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-## Prints some info about that package and lets auto-apt work
-dpkg --status `basename $0` | \
- grep -v ^Priority | \
- grep -v ^Section | \
- grep -v ^Installed-Size
diff -urbN debian-gis.orig/common/control debian-gis/common/control
--- debian-gis.orig/common/control 2007-10-20 11:13:38.0 +0200
+++ debian-gis/common/control 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
-Package: gis-common
-Architecture: all
-Depends: adduser, debconf (= 0.5), menu
-Description: Debian GIS Project common package
- This package builds the basic infra structure of all meta packages
- for the Debian GIS Custom Debian Distribution.
-
diff -urbN debian-gis.orig/config/conf debian-gis/config/conf
--- debian-gis.orig/config/conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ debian-gis/config/conf 2007-10-19 23:21:36.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+## This is a configuration file for Debian-med Custom Debian Distribution
+## It is read after /etc/cdd/cdd.conf and can override or add variables
+
+## This variable is replaced by a debconf question
+## UPDATEUSERMENU=yes
+
+## Some CDDs do not build their name generic like Debian-#CDD# so
+## we need the correct name here
+CDDNAME=Debian GIS
diff -urbN debian-gis.orig/config/config debian-gis/config/config
--- debian-gis.orig/config/config 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ debian-gis/config/config 2007-10-19 18:02:07.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+## Prints some info about that package and lets auto-apt work
+dpkg --status `basename $0` | \
+ grep -v ^Priority | \
+ grep -v ^Section | \
+ grep -v ^Installed-Size
diff -urbN debian-gis.orig/config/config.1 debian-gis/config/config.1
--- debian-gis.orig/config/config.1 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ debian-gis/config/config.1 2007-10-20 11:20:15.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+.TH gis-config 1 Oct 18, 2007 Debian GIS
+.SH NAME
+.B gis-config
+.B gis-meta_package_name
+\- package information and auto-apt helper
+
+.SH SYNOPSIS
+.B gis-config
+.B gis-meta_package_name
+
+.SH DESCRIPTION
+Print just a simple information page about every gis-* package
+of the Debian GIS Custom Debian Distribution. Each metapackage has a
+.I /usr/bin/gis-meta_package_name
+file which should print some usefull informations and could be serve
+as auto-apt helper.
+
+.SH AUTHOR
+Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED].
diff -urbN debian-gis.orig/config/control debian-gis/config/control
--- debian-gis.orig/config/control 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ debian-gis/config/control 2007-10-19 18:12:59.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+Package: gis-config
+Architecture: all
+Depends: adduser, debconf (= 0.5), menu
+Description: Debian GIS Project config package
+ This package builds the basic infra structure of all meta packages
+ for the Debian GIS Custom Debian Distribution.
+
diff -urbN debian-gis.orig/debian/90-config debian-gis/debian/90-config
--- debian-gis.orig/debian/90-config 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ debian-gis/debian/90-config 2007-10-19 23:49:02.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/*
+ * $Id: apt.conf 452 2007-08-27 17:56:18Z tille $
+ */
+/*
+ * APT configuration file for -config package
+ */
+
+DPkg {
+ Post-Invoke {test -f /var/run/-config.usermenu if [ -x /usr/sbin/cdd-update-usermenus ] ; then /usr/sbin/cdd-update-usermenus ; fi ; rm -f /var/run/-config.usermenu;};
+}
diff -urbN debian-gis.orig/debian/control debian-gis/debian/control
--- debian-gis.orig/debian/control 2007-10-20 11:13:38.0 +0200
+++ debian-gis/debian/control 2007-10-20 00:59:53.0 +0200
@@ -3,21 +3,21 @@
Priority: extra
Maintainer: Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Uploaders: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (= 4), cdd-dev
+Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (= 4), cdd-dev (= 0.4.4)
Standards-Version: 3.7.2
-Package: gis-common
+Package: gis-config
Architecture: all
-Depends: adduser, debconf (= 1.2), menu (= 2.1.14)
-Description: Debian GIS Project common package
+Depends: adduser, debconf (= 0.5), menu
+Description: Debian GIS Project config package
This package builds
[DebianGIS-dev] [Announce] New tasks web Bpages for all CDDs
Hi, I'd like to announce the new tasks pages generating system for the CDD tasks pages. I want you to hunt for bugs in these pages for about one week before I replace the old pages by the new ones. My plan is to run a cron job[1] twice a day to regenerate all CDD pages. (The old cron jobs for Debian Med and Debian Science should be taken out operation, for Debian Med I will do this by just inserting an exit 0 in the current script because the owner of the job David Paleino announced to be off line for a while.) Features: - (Hopefully) reimplemented all features of the old system - Fully translated modulo missing DDTP translations (and there are A LOT untranslated descriptions - this is YOUR job in case you have some spare time! ... Just visit the DDTP page[2] and see how you could enhance the situation!) - Better navigation from one task to the others by adding a menu in the left column - Fully translatable for all CDDs (no remaining references to Debian Med) - Easily adaptable for new CDDs by just adding a config file - Index page shows (translated, if there are DDTP translations) descriptions of the tasks instead of a plain list. - Pages are not PHP but static HTML, language preference settings are detected via Options +MultiViews in a .htaccess file (which is auto generated according the languages that are available); List of available languages at the bottom. Question: Do you think it makes sense to generate different sets of languages for different CDDs. I'd regard this as possibly interesting but not high on top of the todo list. Implementation is easy. - Probabably some more new features - Probably some new bugs Please have a look at the pages of your pet-CDD: Debian Edu: http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/edu/tasks_new/ Debian GIS: http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/gis/tasks_new/ Debian Junior: http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/junior/tasks_new/ Debian Med: http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks_new/ Debian Science: http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks_new/ Start working on DDTP decriptions of packages _NOW_! Kind regards Andreas. [1] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/cdd/cdd/trunk/webtools/update-all-tasks?op=filerev=0sc=0 [2] http://ddtp.debian.net/ -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Announcement: New bugs pages, status of renaming
serious bug in a dependent package: 1*10*3 = 30
2 imoprtant bugs in a dependent package: 2* 5*3 = 30
1 normal || 1* 3*3 = 9
1 minor|| 1* 1*3 = 3
___
weighted sum = 72
On the index page
http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/science/bugs
you have a legend about the evaluation parameters: 72 50 (for pass)
which makes the coloring red for this package. Fixing the serious bug
would make the weighted sum 42 which would bring the metapackage in the
next better category satisfactory ( 50).
In other words: A metapackage can not be in status good if there is
at least serious (or higher) bug in a dependant package. It also can
not be very good if there is a RC bug in a suggested package - but
two RC bugs in suggested packages might qualify for good - if there
are only a very view other bugs which sounds quite improbable. Only
one normal bug in a dependent package and no important bug in a
suggested package do qualify for excellent - so this is really
hard to reach.
These numbers might be discussed and we even might consider making
them configurable per CDD in the according webconf file. This is
just a quick shot. For the moment I think it works somehow.
Todo for you
1. Please comment on these pages. Comments with patches for
svn://svn.debian.org/cdd/cdd/trunk/blends/webtools
are even more welcome. There is no need to throw out a lot of
good ideas if there is the chance to turn them into code and
check it in. These pages are not my private pet it is our common
work which just was started by me.
2. Maintain your index page yourself.
David Paleino has created a really nice index page for Debian Med
http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/
Actually all the design was adopted from him and many ideas from
his former tasks and bugs pages are implemented. The other index
pages are at
http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/blend-name
and can be changed at
alioth: /var/lib/gforge/chroot/home/groups/cdd/htdocs/blend-name
No, *I* will *NOT* work on this index page for your blend. I
consider the effort you spend in this page as a measure how much
your Blend is interested in the web tools provided by the
blends effort. If you think linking from a Wiki does the work
as well this is fine for me. But please care for making the
pages popular in your Blend. It is fine for me to provide the
technique, but I will not take over thr grunt work of documentation
for every single blend.
3. Design
As I mentioned above the basic design is from David. If you want
to enhance the page layout, colors, whatever, just have a look at
svn://svn.debian.org/cdd/cdd/trunk/blends/webtools/{inc,templates}
And now for somethinc completely different ...
Status of renaming CDD - Blend
---
When I go for a public announcement of the renaming I wanted to stress
the message: We are not people who are busy finding new names for some
stuff but we care for techniques and promotion of our project. That's
why the announcement of the bug pages comes first - and I hope you agree
that this is the important stuff we are doing.
But for attracting outsiders it is just needed to not confuse from
the beginning and transport a wrong message with a wrong name. The
fact that the old name Custom Debian Distributions just leaded to the
implication that this is something else than Debian finally leaded
to a renaming discussion which reached a raw consensus for the
suggestion
Debian Pure Blends
In the code inside Debian we use 'blend' for factorised code that
concerns a single Blend (given as an option or something like that
and 'blends' if it is working for all Blends in one context. The
Debian and Pure is evidend inside Debian internal code like packages
blends-dev (formerly cdd-dev) or blends-common (formerly cdd-common)
etc. Configuration for blends will go into /etc/blends (formerly
/etc/cdd. The term Blend is just easier to pronounce and makes
more sense than DPB or something like that.
Technically the renaming is not yet completely finished. The
web tools are renamed and a lot of the blend source package
(formerly cdd source package) but not everything and most imoprtantly
not the documentation part. I hope to finish this until Sunday
but I'll be offline from Friday evening to Sunday evening - so
the official announcment on debian-devel-announce will not
happen before Sunday evening.
Talk about Debian Pure Blends at Linux-Info-Tag (Dresden)
-
For German speakers have a look at
http://www.linux-info-tag.de/100/detail/153
Comments for the talk which is available at
http://people.debian.org/~tille/talks/200811_dresden_blends/
are welcome as well.
Please
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] FYI: Netcdf 4 is now available.
Hi Francesco, On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 02:37:33PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: A long due upgrade to current Netcdf (4.0.1) is now available on _experimental_ ... Please, do your homework using the experimental repository to test your apps. Thanks for your work on this. As far as I can see in our SVN this concerns our packages bioimagesuite and minc Please speak up if I missed some package. Could the actual uploaders please have a look? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de Klarmachen zum Ändern! ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Changes in Debian GIS Blend stuff
Hi, yesterday I worked on the Debian GIS Blends stuff because I was bored by the single task layout to move every GIS related application into one single task gis-workstation. When I was read with the restructuring I realised that I do not have any commit permission to pkg-grass SVN (formerly we used svn:external property in Blends SVN to point to this location, but commiting does not work that path). Because I was in a hurry to get the new tasks rendered on the web page I decided to cut this rope and move everything directly to svn://svn.debian.org/blends/projects/gis Please do NOT consider this as a rude tackover but just a workaround to enable me doing a presentation here at DudesConf 3 in A Coruña. I would completely agree to move the stuff back if you would like to maintain the files in pkg-grass - I was just afraid that things might be delayed more than possible until I get commit permissions. Just tell me what you think is the best solution. The poplicy for the Blends SVN is: Every DD has commit permissions - so feel free to work there or ask me for commit permissions if you are no DD. Now to the actual changes (just see [1] for the realisation). First I need to say: I'm no GIS expert at all - just got a new GPS device at christmas and started with some OSM mapping. So it sounded reasonably to me to have a task gis-gps to handle any GPS data and hardware. Moreover I introduced a gis-osm task featuring all OSM related packages. There might be a reason to have also a gis-osm-server task because not all the packages seem to be relevant for simple mappers. I made good experiences with a development task in other blends and so there is a gis-devel task featuring alls the libGIS-RELATED-dev packages. I moved all R related packages from gis-workstation to gis-statistics - I'm definitely sure that there are more GIS relevant R packages in Debian currently. Please add more (in case you consider the gis-statistics task reasonable). I also invented a gis-tools task where I tried to move all smaller tools from gis-workstation which might be useful for people doing GIS work without using the large killer apps like GRASS. This choice of mine is surely questionable - just take it as suggestion and feel free to change it back or draw it into another direction. The last split up from gis-workstation is gis-web where I tried to assemble all packages which provide some addition to webservers. As above I have no idea whether this choice makes really sense - just feel free to enhance my first scratch work. You can change all the tasks by checking out svn://svn.debian.org/blends/projects/gis/trunk/tasks and edit the files there. The principle is simple - if you need further documentation you can find it in the Paper about Blends[2]. You are always invited to join the Blends mailing list[3]. Kind regards Andreas. [1] http://blends.alioth.debian.org/gis/tasks [2] http://blends.alioth.debian.org/blends/ch-sentinel.en.html [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-blends/ -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#578348: gpsprune: Please regard http_proxy environment variable
Package: gpsprune Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, the attached wrapper script regards environment variable http_proxy to enable downloading maps even when sitting behind a proxy. It would be great if this would be included in the package. Kind regards and thanks for maintaining gpsprune Andreas. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-xenU (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: lang=de...@euro, lc_ctype=de...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash #!/bin/sh PRUNEJAR=/usr/share/gpsprune/gpsprune.jar proxyhost=`echo $http_proxy | sed 's?http://\([^:]\+\).*?\1?'` proxyport=`echo $http_proxy | sed 's?http://[^:]\+:\([0-9]\+\)?\1?'` if [ -z $proxyport ] ; then if [ -z $proxyhost ] ; then java -jar $PRUNEJAR $@ else java -Dhttp.proxyHost=$proxyhost -jar $PRUNEJAR $@ fi else java -Dhttp.proxyHost=$proxyhost -Dhttp.proxyPort=$proxyport -jar $PRUNEJAR $@ fi ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Ping: Changes in Debian GIS Blend stuff
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 06:13:01PM -0700, Hamish wrote: my mail[1] to pkg-grass-devel about more or less highjacking their (orphaned) prepearation for metapackages in the Blends style did not triggered any response. sorry, I missed the earlier email. Probably not only you. I noticed that Petter was updating the tasks/workstation file 8 days ago. Petter, do you see any reasonable was to coordinate. As I wrote: I do not really wanted to highjack and I'm fine with maintaining the tasks files inside pkg-grass. So if you think this is the best solution I even might subscribe pkg-grass - perhaps granting commit permissions fo any DD would be easier (we have this for Debian Med and Blends, you can ask Alioth admins for this). the blends pages look nice, thanks for setting it up. I had not really heard of it much before now. If I may ask, how is this different than the old -tasks metapackages beyond now with extra bling? It is NOT different from the metapackages approach. I just suggested some more fine grained metapackages. IMHO a gis-workstation is a bit to general. why can we expect them to be any more successful? Because they are more up to date? Because they specifically address people like OSM mappers which are quite active but do not necessarily want to install all the other packages - so they do not really feel at home with Debian GIS? (I'll admit to still thinking about them as they were back in the dselect days) The existence of reasonably shaped metapackages is practical whatever tool you are using for installation. So I do not understand your hint to dselect. The good news is that obviosely nobody is against my action and so I consider the move of the GIS Blends stuff to svn://svn.debian.org/blends/projects/gis as accepted. Add whatever new work you like- please do not slow down, but kindly do not assume so much about other people's work and interest after a single unanswered email! :) The problem is if mails like this are unanswered I would conclude that there is no general interest in this work and I will not get much support in this. This would mean I'm entertaining the GIS tasks on my own which I really do not want to do because I'm not a GIS expert. IMHO it would be a good idea to remove the old stuff from pkg-grass SVN and possibly set a svn:external property for those who might wonder what happened. Do not do remove it, just add a README.Blends file or so pointing to and explaining your Blends efforts. I hope this mail will help me finding a reasonable way to get commit permissions. I'd prefer DD writable SVN. Currently a number of the DebianGIS team are upstream maintainers helping out and not DDs, with access to the svn via $username- guest and alioth gforge group. I take it they(we) will be locked out if the -task is moved to the blends svn area? I was talking just about the tasks files which currently seem to be maintained only by Petter - so there is no real lock out. But as I said: The tasks files need more love and if you are sure they should stay in pkg-grass SVN I might adapt somehow. Currently the mainly maintained thing is the package list in the DebianGis wiki. Well, IMHO the most comparable thing with the tasks web pages is http://pkg-grass.alioth.debian.org/debiangis-status.html If there is somebody keen on a feature of this page I'd volunteer to reimplemnt this feature in the tasks scope. If only somebody would talk to mee about this ... Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Ping: Changes in Debian GIS Blend stuff
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:12:57AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Andreas Tille] Probably not only you. I noticed that Petter was updating the tasks/workstation file 8 days ago. Petter, do you see any reasonable was to coordinate. I assume s/was/way/. Yes. :-) Note, that as far as I know, the tasks/workstation file is part of the draft debian-gis meta package I wrote several years ago, and which have been largely untouched since then. I have observed this fact (that the tasks file is untouched) for a long time and I finally decided to give it some push for the reasons I layed out in my previous mails. I stumbled across the live CD build part of the meta package a few days ago, did a test build and fixed some minor issues to get the live CD building, announced the new live CD and got tips about an alternative live CD and put some of the packages in the package list from that live CD into the debian-gis package. All of this was a stunt triggered by me finding the old live CD build directory, and is unlikely to result in any regular work on my part. ... and it seems also not by anybody else ... I created the meta package to show what direction we could take the Debian GIS project in, but never had time to follow up on it and no-one else seemed to trigger on the idea of providing a meta package for GIS tools. I'm personally much in favour of the metapackages approach via tasks files since it enables us to generate the web pages I continuosely try to advertise. I have the (biased) impression that since I do so the attraction of the project in question is growing. This is specifically true in Debian Science and Debian Med (but has not stopped Debian Jr dying or helped Debian Lex starting). I'm positively convinced that we have quite good project groups but these groups fail to advertise their work to the world and hope that some users or developers might stumble upon the project by chance. IMHO the effort of maintenance to effect of advertising ratio of using the tasks files is quite good and besides this they turned out a really good QA tool (and I wished they would be used much more as such - see my last rant on Debian Edu). I am regularly busy with other projects, and am unlikely to be able to spend serious time on the gis tools because of this. This make me want others to decide how the meta package should be maintained in the future. Is it wanted? Useful? Worth the effort? I do not know, but others need to answer yes to these for the package to move forward. I would really like to *support* the work on this stuff, but as I said I'm lacking some general overview over GIS packages. From the experience in other Blends I'm perfectly convinced that you need to widen your view from single package maintenance to try to form a complete system which covers certain workfields. The example of Debian Med shows (in a field which is probably much worse covered with FLOSS than GIS): We now have about at least five more DDs because Debian Med exists, Debian is reaching for the distribution of choice if it comes to the use of Free Software in medicine and we have a very good cooperation to several upstream developers. I don't know how things work in Debian GIS and my way to (wild) guess how a team works is to look at the mailing list activity graphs, which are available for Debian GIS here[1]. This shows what you probably know that Francesco is a very active developer over all the time and he definitely is the backbone of Debian GIS. He has got some supporters which changed over time but with perhaps the exception of David (hey David, you just *know* the stuff I'm talking about! ;-)) in the last two years none of them increased their activity. The general activity on the general discussion list is decreasing - even if I think the topic GIS becomes more and more interesting. So I do not see a solidly formed team and the run-over-by-bus factor is close to 1. As I wrote: I do not really wanted to highjack and I'm fine with maintaining the tasks files inside pkg-grass. So if you think this is the best solution I even might subscribe pkg-grass - perhaps granting commit permissions fo any DD would be easier (we have this for Debian Med and Blends, you can ask Alioth admins for this). I suspect giving you write access to the pkg-grass alioth project is a good way to grant you access while still being able to give non-Debian Developers access to the source. I applied for becoming a member of pkg-grass ... even if I have no interest in packaging GRASS. You understood the second part of the sentence? Always if I want to contact Debian GIS people I wonder whether there are only these GRASS packagers hanging around. Yes, I can read the description of the mailing list and I know that this is not the case, but I'm afraid that there are other people out there which are afraid about posting here if you are focussing that exclusively on GRASS. But from
[DebianGIS-dev] [instal...@ftp-master.debian.org: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes is NEW]
Hi, just to let you know that we are now just waiting for ftpmaster approval. ;-) Kind regards and thanks for your support Andreas. - Forwarded message from Archive Administrator instal...@ftp-master.debian.org - From: Archive Administrator instal...@ftp-master.debian.org To: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org, Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Subject: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes is NEW Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:17:09 + X-Spam_score: -3.0 (new) debian-gis_0.0.1.dsc extra misc (new) debian-gis_0.0.1.tar.gz extra misc (new) gis-gps_0.0.1_all.deb extra misc GPS related programs Set of Debian packages which are dealing with GPS devices and data. (new) gis-osm_0.0.1_all.deb extra misc OpenStreetMap related programs Set of Debian packages which are dealing with OpenStreetMap data. (new) gis-statistics_0.0.1_all.deb extra misc Statistics with geographical data Set of Debian packages which are useful for doing statistics with geographical data. (new) gis-tasks_0.0.1_all.deb extra misc Debian GIS tasks for tasksel This package provides Debian GIS tasks in tasksel. . These tasks are described in detail at http://blends.alioth.debian.org/gis/tasks/ (new) gis-web_0.0.1_all.deb extra misc Present geographic information using web features Debian packages which are dealing with geographical information to be presented for the web. (new) gis-workstation_0.0.1_all.deb extra misc Geographic Information Systems (GIS) workstation This task sets up your system to be a GIS workstation to process geographical information and make maps. Changes: debian-gis (0.0.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release. (Closes: #587856) Override entries for your package: Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 587856 Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above if files already exist in other distributions. - End forwarded message - -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Debian GIS metapackages available [Was: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
Hi, I would like to inform you that ftpmaster has accepted the Debian GIS metapackages. I will care for pushing this information to the Squeeze release notes. Moreover I discussed with David Paleino about Mailing list naming. I learned that I'm not the only one who was confused by the name of a specific package (GRASS) in a more general scope mailing list. To fix this I would like to propose the following change: 1. Move the general discussion about GIS to a to be created mailing list about all GIS issues in Debian. If you agree I will ask listmaster for registering debian-...@lists.debian.org 2. Keep those mails which are concerning the *package* *development* of packages like GRASS, Qgis etc in pkg-grass-devel and use pkg-osm-maint for OSM and GPS devices related stuff Please tell me what you think about this plan to make Debian GIS more visible inside Debian. Kind regards Andreas. - Forwarded message from Archive Administrator instal...@ftp-master.debian.org - From: Archive Administrator instal...@ftp-master.debian.org To: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org, Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Subject: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:02:07 + X-Spam_score: -3.0 Accepted: debian-gis_0.0.1.dsc to main/d/debian-gis/debian-gis_0.0.1.dsc debian-gis_0.0.1.tar.gz to main/d/debian-gis/debian-gis_0.0.1.tar.gz gis-gps_0.0.1_all.deb to main/d/debian-gis/gis-gps_0.0.1_all.deb gis-osm_0.0.1_all.deb to main/d/debian-gis/gis-osm_0.0.1_all.deb gis-statistics_0.0.1_all.deb to main/d/debian-gis/gis-statistics_0.0.1_all.deb gis-tasks_0.0.1_all.deb to main/d/debian-gis/gis-tasks_0.0.1_all.deb gis-web_0.0.1_all.deb to main/d/debian-gis/gis-web_0.0.1_all.deb gis-workstation_0.0.1_all.deb to main/d/debian-gis/gis-workstation_0.0.1_all.deb Override entries for your package: debian-gis_0.0.1.dsc - source misc gis-gps_0.0.1_all.deb - extra misc gis-osm_0.0.1_all.deb - extra misc gis-statistics_0.0.1_all.deb - extra misc gis-tasks_0.0.1_all.deb - extra misc gis-web_0.0.1_all.deb - extra misc gis-workstation_0.0.1_all.deb - extra misc Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 587856 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. - End forwarded message - -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Debian GIS metapackages available [Was: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 02:30:18PM +0200, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org wrote:
1. Move the general discussion about GIS to a to be created
mailing list about all GIS issues in Debian. If you agree
I will ask listmaster for registering
debian-...@lists.debian.org
I'm pro. Even if only one person joins debian-gis who would not join
pkg-grass-general (or finds a message in an archive, ...),I consider
the move successful.
Fine. I think we are now three persons who consider a
debian-...@lists.debian.org
list as useful - so just let's talk there. I'll care for the creation
of this list and keep you informed.
In fact, I think you should send your message also to the
pkg-grass-general list to get feedback.
In CC.
2. Keep those mails which are concerning the *package* *development*
of packages like GRASS, Qgis etc in pkg-grass-devel and use
pkg-osm-maint for OSM and GPS devices related stuff
I'm not the right person to judge how much work switching that list is
(eg all packages refer to the list), but I would also move towards
debian-gis-devel. It is more consistent, and if the debian-gis list is
created, we have the 'momentum' to change it, otherwise it will not
happen.
I admit this would also be my preference but I was hesitant to fight
historically grown habits. On the other hand to do things right we
should register an Alioth project Debian GIS and create the mailing list
there (I would prefer developer oriented list on Alioth and the general
discussion list on l.d.o - this has turned out to be useful for other
projects as well). In Debian Med and Debian Science there is a list
for collaborative maintainership of medical/science related packages
(debian-med-packag...@l.a.d.o / debian-science-maintain...@l.a.d.o) and
also a list for the commits (debian-{med|science}-comm...@l.a.d.o .
I would consider it a good idea to go with this scheme.
The problem is that we have to fight an historical split (pkg-grass and
pkg-osm, where the later is probably solvable) and this will take some
time of migration and I wonder if there is some common will to push this
change. If you ask me it is perfectly reasonable to do, but it is very
hard if it is not supported by the whole group.
Anyway, don't ask my opinion, but perhaps frankie can judge if
it is doable?
I'm actually a bit concerned that frankie stays silent to all mails in
this discussion ...
When we talked three years ago at Debconf 7 in Edinburgh (the last time
I met Frankie) he was in principle in favour of the Blends idea. Some
confirmation or doubts would be helpful to proceed here.
Please tell me what you think about this plan to make Debian GIS more
visible inside Debian.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Debian GIS metapackages available [Was: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 02:30:18PM +0200, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org wrote:
1. Move the general discussion about GIS to a to be created
mailing list about all GIS issues in Debian. If you agree
I will ask listmaster for registering
debian-...@lists.debian.org
I'm pro. Even if only one person joins debian-gis who would not join
pkg-grass-general (or finds a message in an archive, ...),I consider
the move successful.
Fine. I think we are now three persons who consider a
debian-...@lists.debian.org
list as useful - so just let's talk there. I'll care for the creation
of this list and keep you informed.
In fact, I think you should send your message also to the
pkg-grass-general list to get feedback.
In CC.
2. Keep those mails which are concerning the *package* *development*
of packages like GRASS, Qgis etc in pkg-grass-devel and use
pkg-osm-maint for OSM and GPS devices related stuff
I'm not the right person to judge how much work switching that list is
(eg all packages refer to the list), but I would also move towards
debian-gis-devel. It is more consistent, and if the debian-gis list is
created, we have the 'momentum' to change it, otherwise it will not
happen.
I admit this would also be my preference but I was hesitant to fight
historically grown habits. On the other hand to do things right we
should register an Alioth project Debian GIS and create the mailing list
there (I would prefer developer oriented list on Alioth and the general
discussion list on l.d.o - this has turned out to be useful for other
projects as well). In Debian Med and Debian Science there is a list
for collaborative maintainership of medical/science related packages
(debian-med-packag...@l.a.d.o / debian-science-maintain...@l.a.d.o) and
also a list for the commits (debian-{med|science}-comm...@l.a.d.o .
I would consider it a good idea to go with this scheme.
The problem is that we have to fight an historical split (pkg-grass and
pkg-osm, where the later is probably solvable) and this will take some
time of migration and I wonder if there is some common will to push this
change. If you ask me it is perfectly reasonable to do, but it is very
hard if it is not supported by the whole group.
Anyway, don't ask my opinion, but perhaps frankie can judge if
it is doable?
I'm actually a bit concerned that frankie stays silent to all mails in
this discussion ...
When we talked three years ago at Debconf 7 in Edinburgh (the last time
I met Frankie) he was in principle in favour of the Blends idea. Some
confirmation or doubts would be helpful to proceed here.
Please tell me what you think about this plan to make Debian GIS more
visible inside Debian.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#588812: lists.debian.org: Please create Debian GIS mailing list
Package: lists.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi listmasters, after some discussion on the pkg-grass mailing lists[1] which are currently used to do general discussions and not only issues about packaging GRASS we came up with the conclusion that it is better to have a dedicated mailing list for Debian GIS. The fact that metapackages of a Debian GIS Blend were just accepted by ftpmaster lets us think there now is a good moment to do so. Here is some description of the scope: The goal of the Debian GIS project is improving Debian to make it the best distribution for professional Geographical Information Systems, support of GPS devices and providing various OpenStreetMap tools to make Debian the distribution of choice for mappers. Home: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianGis Kind regards and thanks for maintaining lists.debian.org Andreas. [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2010-July/007756.html -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-xenU (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: lang=de...@euro, lc_ctype=de...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Debian GIS metapackages available [Was: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
Hi Francesco, On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 03:40:53PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: I have not specific preferences about lists, I simply would note that pkg-grass-general/devel were born at the time to manage a low traffic packaging oriented list and listmasters had the opinion that alioth lists were appropriate for that. I hope that listmasters will agree that this is not the case any more. That said, I would also note that current -general list is closed to subscribers, while debian-gis would be open to the world (as generally done for all listmasters lists), with obvious consequence for subscribers about spamming... The pros and cons are heavily discussed in the past and I do not think it makes sense to repeat this discussion. I personally get about one or two mails per month from each mailinlist @l.d.o thanks to the spamfilters the listmasters applied (thanks to the effort of listmasters!) and local SPAM filters. That's IMHO acceptable. I take your mail as somethink like it is fine for me to create the list if you care for it and thus I hope the mailing list can be created soon. Question to listmasters: Is it possible to take over the content of the list archive of pkg-grass-general to debian-gis archive? I guess the different listservers might make this hard and I do not really want to put this on you. But if there would be a reasonable way to do this it would be probably a good idea. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#590471: josm: missing images
Package: josm Version: 0.0.svn3376-1 Severity: minor Hi, when starting Josm and quiting it immediately I get the following error messages on console: $ josm Using /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java to execute josm. Debian-Release: 0.0.svn3376-1 Build-Date: 2010-07-18 15:51:31 Revision: 3376 Is-Local-Build: true Fatal: failed to locate image 'service/fire_hydrant.png'. This is a serious configuration problem. JOSM will stop working. Mappaint style standard icon service/fire_hydrant.png not found. Fatal: failed to locate image 'fixme.png'. This is a serious configuration problem. JOSM will stop working. Mappaint style standard icon fixme.png not found. Fatal: failed to locate image 'fixme.png'. This is a serious configuration problem. JOSM will stop working. Mappaint style standard icon fixme.png not found. Kind regards and thanks for maintaining Josm Andreas. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-xenU (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: lang=de...@euro, lc_ctype=de...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Bug#588812: Debian GIS metapackages available [Was: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
Hi, On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 03:12:29PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: tag 588812 moreinfo thanks different listservers might make this hard and I do not really want to put this on you. But if there would be a reasonable way to do this it would be probably a good idea. Its no problem to import old mails if the come in a common format like mbox. If you really want this list get some seconders and complete the request as listed in: http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/HOWTO_start_list. It has become quite silent about this issue and I can understand listmaster to ask for seconders. So what do you think about my suggestions to make Debian GIS more popular than it currently is? I think it is a shame that Debian GIS is quite unknown to potentially interested persons and please trust me: I asked a lot of people when I did talks about Blends and mentioned Debian GIS as a potential Blend - there was nobody aware of this project whereever I asked. And there where people around which are working with GIS software. I also continue to think that we should try to involve OSM into the Debian GIS project. This all makes IMHO a lot of sense to discuss on a mailing list and especially if we are in the process of a release mentioning such a mailing list in the release notes would give the project a lot of attention and probably new supporters. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Bug#588812: Debian GIS metapackages available [Was: debian-gis_0.0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:44:52AM -0700, Hamish wrote: Sorry if I come off a bit grumpy :) No problem. Sometimes e-mail communication is hard. ;-) The more part is that I'm having the hope that the list will not only get a new name (and home) (by 'home' I take it you mean @lists.d.o instead of @alioth.d.o server?) Yes. That's exactly the whole point of the arguing. I would not make such a fuzz about just a list renaming on alioth and the bug report I was refering to is exactly about this. but turns into a medium where we actively can attract users (and later developers) better than before. among those who frequent the lists of debian lists, yes, and that is not a bad crowd to be exposed to. Exposal to people - that's actually the keyword ... So what to say? My first point is that she did not understand the Do-O-cracy principle in Debian. Not Debian has decided but one (or more) developers just have done something (packaging Qgis). my first impressions on that comment are - ... - I'd forgive the debian executive has made a decision to package qgis as it is quite a strange notion to outsiders who are used to corporations or top-down NGOs. I can forgive this as well for sure. My point was: We need a visible channel to educate people about the difference in Debian and who they can become part of the movement. It happens 3-4 times a year on Debian Med list that we are able to turn people with similar imagination about Debian into members of the packaging team (currently there is also a thread active where I try to patiently explain about proper packaging of OpenMRS (hospital management system) to a very engaged Debian newbee who is closely connected to upstream. This guy is learning quite quickly and we have contact *because* there is a visible list. backport or not). So she simply failed to get the information she was seeking. and yet she did hear of it from somewhere anyway..? But only the rumor - not a way to apt-get install ... there is one, two actually if you include UbuntuGIS, and three if you include the qgis list(s), and many more if you include the local osgeo chapters and international osgeo lists. I fully agree that lowering the barriers to entry are important. That's the point. We should not trust other parties like Ubuntu or different upstream. IMHO it is our obligation to run such a list (and for sure we should cooperate with the others). http://blends.debian.net/liststats/authorstat_pkg-grass-general.png grain of salt: you must put that graph in perspective with the rise of the OSGeo movement, which often informally communicates things which would otherwise find a home here. Or maybe Frankie is just so damn efficient and everything works that we don't get many complaints :o) aka determining causation is a difficult call. Sure. Such graphs do not really tell a whole story. There are often more than just one simple explanations and BTW, I'm confident that Frankie is really efficient. However, please mind the run-over-by-bus effect. And it actually does not need an accident to lose developers. If you remember that developers become parents and need to care for children more then for Debian a one man driven team might be in danger to become ineffective. I congratulate you on that, by any measure of success that is a healthy situation to be in. but does FOSS 4 Med have an equivalent to OSGeo already filling that niche? I admit I do not know OSGeo enough to be able to do a real comparison. I can confirm that there are FOSS 4 Med related lists where I was subscribed in former times. I learned that there is a lot of *really* interesting *discussion* but just discussion without *implementation* finally does not help. The good thing in Debian is that we just have an *implementation ready to run* the things we are discussing about and IMHO this is a major point. The tendency on the pkg-grass-general list is rather contrary. I do not want to say that it is just a question of the name of the list. But I know for sure from the example above (and others not mentioned here) that a pure packaging list on Alioth is not a good entry point to start. Perhaps that's where our miscommunication lies, I've still been thinking of it as mostly a packaging dev list, as opposed to say an osgeo-disc...@. (not that I have any strong feeling of what it should be, just observation on what it has been) For me as a GIS outsider who just started to dive into GIS issues (mostly via OSM but perhaps I might have other applications from my job - think of epidemiology issues) this is really the point. The fact that we are continuosely CCing both pkg-grass lists (because the difference is not really clear) and the discussion on pkg-grass-general which is also quite packaging centric is something which did not really attracted me and the suggestion is not only a rename (and move) but also shifting the focus a bit more
[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#600953: gpsprune: Gpsprune simply aborts
Package: gpsprune Version: 11-1 Severity: important Tags: sid Hi, yesterday I was perfectly able to edit a GPS track using gpsprune. Without any change on the system (no apt-get) today gpsprune breaks even if called with no argument. On console I get ~$ gpsprune # # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # SIGBUS (0x7) at pc=0x7f5d2382dd9b, pid=9993, tid=140038018230032 # # JRE version: 6.0_18-b18 # Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (16.0-b13 mixed mode linux-amd64 ) # Derivative: IcedTea6 1.8.1 # Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid), package 6b18-1.8.1-2 # Problematic frame: # C [libc.so.6+0x7ed9b] memset+0xa5b # # An error report file with more information is saved as: # /home/tillea/hs_err_pid9993.log # # If you would like to submit a bug report, please include # instructions how to reproduce the bug and visit: # http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla # Aborted The error log file is attached to this mail. Kind regards and thanks for maintaining gpsprune Andreas. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (5, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages gpsprune depends on: ii default-jre [java6-runtime] 1:1.6-40 Standard Java or Java compatible R ii libmetadata-extractor-java 2.3.1+dfsg-2 JPEG metadata extraction framework ii openjdk-6-jre [java6-runtim 6b18-1.8.1-2 OpenJDK Java runtime, using Hotspo Versions of packages gpsprune recommends: ii gnuplot 4.4.0-1.1A command-line driven interactive ii gpsbabel1.4.0-1 GPS file conversion plus transfer ii libimage-exiftool-perl 8.15-1 Library and program to read and wr ii libjava3d-java 1.5.2+dfsg-5 Java 3D API (java library) ii libjava3d-jni 1.5.2+dfsg-5 Java3D API (java jni library) ii libvecmath-java 1.5.2-2 javax.vecmath vector math package gpsprune suggests no packages. -- no debconf information # # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # SIGBUS (0x7) at pc=0x7f5d2382dd9b, pid=9993, tid=140038018230032 # # JRE version: 6.0_18-b18 # Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (16.0-b13 mixed mode linux-amd64 ) # Derivative: IcedTea6 1.8.1 # Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid), package 6b18-1.8.1-2 # Problematic frame: # C [libc.so.6+0x7ed9b] memset+0xa5b # # If you would like to submit a bug report, please include # instructions how to reproduce the bug and visit: # http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla # --- T H R E A D --- Current thread is native thread siginfo:si_signo=SIGBUS: si_errno=0, si_code=2 (BUS_ADRERR), si_addr=0x7f5d2455c000 Registers: RAX=0x7f5d2455c000, RBX=0x7f5d2455c000, RCX=0x, RDX=0x RSP=0x7f5d2454da98, RBP=0x7f5d2454dbb0, RSI=0x, RDI=0x7f5d2455c000 R8 =0x7f80, R9 =0x0008, R10=0x, R11=0x7f5d2382d710 R12=0x8000, R13=0x0003, R14=0x7f5d2454e6b8, R15=0x7f5d2454dae0 RIP=0x7f5d2382dd9b, EFL=0x00010206, CSGSFS=0x0033, ERR=0x0006 TRAPNO=0x000e Top of Stack: (sp=0x7f5d2454da98) 0x7f5d2454da98: 7f5d2328c10e 6e696c004c54504e 0x7f5d2454daa8: 2115 211523b0be98 0x7f5d2454dab8: 00eea740 00eea710 0x7f5d2454dac8: 00eec700 7f5d2454db78 0x7f5d2454dad8: 00eec720 0011 0x7f5d2454dae8: 6dcd 0002 0x7f5d2454daf8: 05ae41ed 041a 0x7f5d2454db08: 003c 0x7f5d2454db18: 1000 0x7f5d2454db28: 4cc08e63 1166ff7b 0x7f5d2454db38: 4cc08e63 1166ff7b 0x7f5d2454db48: 4cc08e63 1166ff7b 0x7f5d2454db58: 0x7f5d2454db68: 7f5d2454dd70 0x7f5d2454db78: 7f5d2454dba0 0x7f5d2454db88: 7f5d23783f60 7f5d2454de0f 0x7f5d2454db98: 7f5d2454de80 7f5d2454dcf0 0x7f5d2454dba8: 7f5d2454dd70 7f5d2454dbe0 0x7f5d2454dbb8: 7f5d2328b8f4 7f5d2454dbd0 0x7f5d2454dbc8: 7f5d22ec6dee 7f5d2454dbe0 0x7f5d2454dbd8: 7f5d2454ddf0 0x7f5d2454dbe8: 7f5d23355a93 0x7f5d2454dbf8: 7f5d24353dda 0x7f5d2454dc08: 7f5d2454dc90 0x7f5d2454dc18: 7f5d2454dc90 00ee5538 0x7f5d2454dc28: 0009 a8428197 0x7f5d2454dc38: 7f5d24354500
[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#600953: gpsprune: Gpsprune simply aborts
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:09:38PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: yesterday I was perfectly able to edit a GPS track using gpsprune. Without any change on the system (no apt-get) today gpsprune breaks even if called with no argument. On console I get I realised that a running JOSM process seemed to be responsible for this problem. After aborting the running JOSM Prune works as expected. I realised this when I tried to start another JOSM process which ended in the very same problem as starting prune. I can also confirm that not only gpsprune version 11 but also version 10 from testing is affected by this problem. Can you confirm that a running JOSM process prevents prune from starting as well as anny additional JOSM process? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Bug#588812: lists.debian.org: Please create Debian GIS mailing list
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:23:53PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: Ok, as asked by the originator of this request, currently I see no specific problems in moving to use debian-...@l.d.o and debian-gis-committ...@l.d.o, Just to clarify the list request issue (where I was the originator): The main point is not *moving* the content of one currently existing list into two (how should be thia done?) but rather *creating* a new list for general discussion of GIS in Debian issues. The existence of such a list has turned out to have a positive effect regarding the communication between users and developers especially to gather new developers for the team. In short: the current developer oriented list which is used to discuss mostly pure packaging issues is not affected by my *original* suggestion. but for the fact that the the main list is an open one (with probably a better antispam management). Other people did express some concerns about that. Note that also the current pkg-grass-devel list is open, but rules are good enough to avoid spamming AFAIK. My own pro is that I could avoid to loose time to manage the two lists :) About the history, as explained on the wiki: An existing mailing list can be moved to lists.debian.org: the administrator of the list has to submit a request as described above and provide us with a list of subscribers (in plain text format, one address per line). Archives of the existing list can also be imported from files in mbox format (preferably split per month). So I *think* the past history could be moved from alioth to lists.d.o. I can surely provide a subscribers list too. The discussion was somehow extended by the suggestion to solve the confusion about the naming of the developer oriented list. I agree with this suggestion but it is a separate issue (even if it has the same goal in mind). If I remember right the suggestion was also not to move the developer list from alioth to l.d.o. Usually you find the developer oriented lists at alioth and I do not see any reason for changing this. I would welcome if we would not spoil the original discussion with this issue because it obviosely has created more confusion than needed. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Bug#588812: lists.debian.org: Please create Debian GIS mailing list
Hi Francesco, uhmm, I I think I added even more confusioin to this issue than it was. Sorry for this. On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: Sorry Andreas, but if I understood correctly your suggestion, you are proposing a non-packaging list for GIS related topics in Debian? I found that interesting but quite a duplicate of the -general list whose topic was from start discussing packaging issues AND other GIS related topic. So IMHO it makes sense moving the whole list in any case, to avoid unuseful duplicates. Yes, you are perfectly right. The content of -general should be moved do debian-...@lists.debian.org. We should discuss the pkg-grass-devel issue in a different thread to not mix up things that much. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Updatable packages of debian-gis
Updatable packages in Task workstation gdal: Highest version in Debian is 1.7.2-2 Upstream has 1.7.3 Maintainer is Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Last uploader was Francesco Paolo Lovergine fran...@debian.org geographiclib: Highest version in Debian is 1.2-1 Upstream has 1.4 Maintainer is Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Last uploader was Francesco Paolo Lovergine fran...@debian.org gmt: Highest version in Debian is 4.2.1-4 Upstream has 4.5.5 Maintainer is Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Last uploader was Francesco Paolo Lovergine fran...@debian.org grass: Highest version in Debian is 6.4.0-1 Upstream has 6.4.0RC7 Maintainer is Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Last uploader was Francesco Paolo Lovergine fran...@debian.org postgis: Highest version in Debian is 1.4.0-2 Upstream has 1.5.2 Maintainer is Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Last uploader was Francesco Paolo Lovergine fran...@debian.org qgis: Highest version in Debian is 1.4.0+12730-3+b2 Upstream has 1.5.0 Maintainer is Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Last uploader was Francesco Paolo Lovergine fran...@debian.org grass: Highest version in Debian is 6.4.0-1 Upstream has 6.4.0RC7 Maintainer is Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Last uploader was Francesco Paolo Lovergine fran...@debian.org openjump: Highest version in Debian is 1.0-4 Upstream has 1.4.0.2 Maintainer is Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Last uploader was Kumar Appaiah aku...@debian.org Updatable packages in Task statistics r-cran-sp: Highest version in Debian is 0.9-73-1 Upstream has 0.9-74 Maintainer is Debian Science Team debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Last uploader was Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Updatable packages in Task osm viking: Highest version in Debian is 0.9.94-3 Upstream has 0.9.96 Maintainer is Bernd Zeimetz b...@debian.org Updatable packages in Task gps qlandkartegt: Highest version in Debian is 0.18.5-1 Upstream has 0.20.1 Maintainer is Michael Hanke michael.ha...@gmail.com ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] Bug#588812: Bug#588812: lists.debian.org: Please create Debian GIS mailing list
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 09:00:32PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: What about the content - or should I just create the list? Please take over the content from http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-general/ (yes, the general list, not the development oriented list). P.S. and please complete the request according to: http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/HOWTO_start_list Name: debian-gis Rationale: general discussion about GIS in Debian should not be hidden on alioth with a missleading name (of only one single GIS package Short description: General discussion about Debian GIS Long description: Discussion about Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in Debian. For more information about the Debian GIS Blend see http://wiki.debian.org/DebianGis Category: Developers Subscription Policy: open Post Policy: open Web Archive: yes I'm no admin of pkg-grass-gene...@lists.alioth.debian.org and thus I can not provide the needed info for the moving. I hope Francesco will step in. Kind regards and thanks for maintaining lists.debian.org Andreas. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] RFS: epr-api
Hi Antonio, On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:10:35PM +0100, Antonio Valentino wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package epr-api. * Package name: epr-api Version : 2.2-1 Upstream Author : Brockmann Consult i...@brockmann-consult.de * URL : http://github.com/bcdev/epr-api * License : GPL2 Section : libs It builds these binary packages: libepr-api2 - ENVISAT Product Reader API for C libepr-api2-dev - ENVISAT Product Reader API for C The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 606877 My motivation for maintaining this package is: I would like to maintain packages for the specialized SW related to SAR processing and Earth Observation that I currently use for job. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/epr-api - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/epr-api/epr-api_2.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. In principle I could sponsor the package however I think you should follow the advise given at http://wiki.debian.org/DebianGis/InfoForDevelopers#Maintainership and use the Debian GIS developers list as maintainer and put yourself as Uploader. I'm not sure about Debian GIS upload policy but in Debian Med we usually use DM-Upload-Allowed: yes to enable DMs uploading packages. (If you seriousely consider working on these packages long term which is what I understand from your mails you should definitely apply for becomming a DM / DD.) Moreover I would like you to inject your packaging into Debian GIS SVN and set Vcs fields accordingly. BTW, lintian reveals some Information messages if started in nitpicking mode: lintian -i -I *.deb *.dsc Perhaps you might consider fixing these as well. Kind regards and thanks for working on these packages Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] RFS: epr-api
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 01:40:47PM +0100, Antonio Valentino wrote: I've sent a request to be added to the pkg-grass group via FusionForge. Good. If you think epr-api.git should be pushed in git://git.debian.org/pkg-grass please let me know, but I have to wait to be added to the pkg-grass group to do it. This would make perfectly sense. Just tell me once it is there and I'll edit the tasks file accordingly to point to your packaging effort. Unfortunately the library exports non-public symbols so, if my understanding of http://wiki.debian.org/UsingSymbolsFiles is correct symbols versioning should not be used. Of course I could try to make a patch for this if you think. THat's not really necessary - I just wanted to make sure you are aware of these lintian infos and handle them if you think they can be reasonably handled. Kind regards and thanks for your work on this Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] RFS: epr-api
On 18 Dec 2010 Antonio Valentino wrote: Andreas, the package now has some modifications with respect to the one uploaded to mentrors.debian.net. Should I re-upload modified package or it is no more needed? In case you want me to sponsor the package it is fine if you tell me the VCS location. However, I'm not very knowledged in this field and can only veryfy the pure packaging stuff. So if there some more educated member of the Debian GIS team would step in this would probably a good idea. If nobody might step up I can check and upload the package in case you state explicitely that it is ready for an upload (in your mail above you said only that you modified it - that's no clear advise for me ;-) ). For the re-upload question: I'd consider it important that if there are two locations of some software which is featuring the same version number they should be identical. So either you remove the package from mentors and maintain it only in Vcs or you should sync it with mentors. Otherwise there are chances that somewone graps the old stuff from mentors.d.n without notifying that it is outdated. Kind regards and thanks for your work on this Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] RFS: epr-api
Hi Antonio, On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:56:18PM +0100, Antonio Valentino wrote: OK, I removed the package from debian.mentors.net. Now the package is in pkg-grass git repo git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/epr-api.git OK. Also I set the control fields Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser accordingly in the control file (I'm going to update the task file in the blends repo) and tagged the final version as debian/2.2-1. It is better to tag the status *after* the actual upload in case some changes are necessary. From my point of view the package is ready for the upload so I would appreciate a lot if you or some other developer would like to sponsor it. I did a quick check and found out that it does not build twice in a row. Something might (or might not?) be wrong with the clean target: ... make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/andreas/debian-maintain/sponsor/antonio/epr-api/epr-api-2.2' if [ -d . ]; then \ cd . QUILT_PATCHES=/home/andreas/debian-maintain/sponsor/antonio/epr-api/epr-api-2.2/debian/patches quilt --quiltrc /dev/null pop -a -R || test $? = 2 ; \ fi Patch fix-build-flags.patch does not remove cleanly (refresh it or enforce with -f) make: *** [reverse-patches] Error 1 ... Can you reproduce (and fix) this? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#610006: josm: Please enable respecting system proxy settings
Package: josm
Version: 0.0.svn3751-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
when trying to set proxy to system settings JOSM says that it is
necessary to call JOSM with -Djava.net.useSystemProxies=true option.
If this is not set you can not even choose the system proxy setting from
the menu. I'd regard it reasonable to at least enable using system
proxy if wanted without restarting JOSM manually. The following patch
would do the trick:
--- josm.orig 2011-01-01 23:50:15.0 +0100
+++ josm2011-01-13 23:22:34.0 +0100
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
JAVA_CMDS=$JAVA_HOME/bin/java /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/bin/java
fi
-JAVA_OPTS=$JAVA_OPTS -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true
+JAVA_OPTS=$JAVA_OPTS -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true
-Djava.net.useSystemProxies=true
for jcmd in $JAVA_CMDS; do
if [ z$ALTERNATIVE_JDK = z`readlink -n -f $jcmd` ] [ -z
${JAVACMD} ]; then
Kind regards and thanks for maintaining JOSM
Andreas.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (5, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages josm depends on:
ii libgettext-commons-java 0.9.6-2 Java classes for internationalizat
ii libmetadata-extractor-j 2.3.1+dfsg-2 JPEG metadata extraction framework
ii liboauth-signpost-java 1.2.1.1-1simple OAuth message signing for J
ii openjdk-6-jre 6b18-1.8.3-2 OpenJDK Java runtime, using Hotspo
ii openstreetmap-map-icons 1:0.0.svn20783-1 Collection of map icons (classic s
Versions of packages josm recommends:
ii josm-plugins 0.0.svn24925-2 Plugins for JOSM
ii webkit-image-gtk 0.0.svn24632-1 generate images from webpages - GT
josm suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Seems spatialite-tools needs to be removed from testing
Hi, I tried to do some RC bug hunting and stumbled upon #661018. While the problem was Fixed in versions spatialite-tools/3.1.0b-1, spatialite/3.0.1-1 the package does not migrate to testing due to the dependency relation explained here: http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=spatialite-tools So libreadosm1 is not in testing and thus spatialite-tools remains uninstallable. IMHO the consequence would be to file a removal from testing request. I'd volunteer to do so if you might be busy with other stuff. Kind regards Andreas. PS: Please CC me, I'm not subscribed to the list. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#698341: RM: spatialite-tools/3.0.0~beta20110817-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Hi, I've got confirmation from Francesco P. Lovergine fran...@debian.org, member of pkg-grass team to ask for removal of spatialite-tools from testing due to the removal of its dependency libreadosm1. Kind regards and thanks for your release team work Andreas. On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 02:02:07PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: I tried to do some RC bug hunting and stumbled upon #661018. While the problem was Fixed in versions spatialite-tools/3.1.0b-1, spatialite/3.0.1-1 the package does not migrate to testing due to the dependency relation explained here: http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=spatialite-tools So libreadosm1 is not in testing and thus spatialite-tools remains uninstallable. IMHO the consequence would be to file a removal from testing request. I'd volunteer to do so if you might be busy with other stuff. Kind regards Andreas. PS: Please CC me, I'm not subscribed to the list. Andreas, please proceed and thanks so much. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.6 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-xenU-4814-i386 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#661018: Bug#698341: RM: spatialite-tools/3.0.0~beta20110817-3
Hi Julien,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:10:13PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Andreas, we can't remove packages that have rdeps. Stable needs to be
self-contained.
Sorry for this beginners mistake and the extra work to check for you.
I tried to give this package another shot but stumbled way earlier about
a FTBFS problem. I created a fresh wheezy chroot and tried
$ debuild
...
dh build
dh_testdir
debian/rules override_dh_auto_configure
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/spatialite/spatialite-3.0.0~beta20110817'
dh_auto_configure -Dlibspatialite -- \
--enable-geos \
--enable-proj \
\
--disable-geosadvanced
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
...
checking geos_c.h usability... yes
checking geos_c.h presence... yes
checking for geos_c.h... yes
checking for library containing GEOSTopologyPreserveSimplify... no
configure: error: 'libgeos_c' is required but it doesn't seems to be installed
on this system.
dh_auto_configure: ./configure --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr
--includedir=${prefix}/include --mandir=${prefix}/share/man
--infodir=${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var
--libexecdir=${prefix}/lib/spatialite --disable-maintainer-mode
--disable-dependency-tracking --enable-geos --enable-proj
--disable-geosadvanced returned exit code 1
make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_configure] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/spatialite/spatialite-3.0.0~beta20110817'
make: *** [build] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
So it seems that libgeos-dev is somehow broken but when I try
$ strings /usr/lib/libgeos_c.a | grep GEOSTopologyPreserveSimplify
GEOSTopologyPreserveSimplify
GEOSTopologyPreserveSimplify_r
GEOSTopologyPreserveSimplify
GEOSTopologyPreserveSimplify_r
GEOSTopologyPreserveSimplify_r
it seems that the symbol that is missed by the configure script is
available in the library in question. Before I might create more noise
and because I know there are frequent auto-build tests and so the
problem should have been detected earlier: Am I missing something or
should I file another bug report against src:spatialite ?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#701506: ITP: osrm -- high performance routing engine for shortest paths in road networks
Hi Chris, thanks for the ITP. You might like to consider maintaining the package in the pkg-gis team using their VCS. Kind regards Andreas. On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:02:58PM +, Chris wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Chris ch...@chris-desktop.home * Package name: osrm Version : 0.3.2 Upstream Author : Dennis Luxen lu...@kit.edu * URL : http://project-osrm.org/ * License : AGPL Programming Lang: C++ Description : high performance routing engine for shortest paths in road networks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130223220258.30970.50959.report...@chris-desktop.home -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#705046: unblock: debian-gis/0.0.2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package debian-gis As announced in [1] I now uploaded debian-gis metapackages targeting at Wheezy. The changes in the debian-gis package are to a large extend auto generated by blends-dev and the full debdiff (attached debian-gis_0.0.2.debdiff.gz) is a bit hard to read because the files in tasks/ are serving at the same time used as documentation for the Debian GIS web sentinel[2]. There is no reasonable way to maintain this in a separate source so the diff is larger than you would usually accept these days. However, this was explained in [1] and was done this way in the last releases as well (and recently for other Blends). To enable you concentrating on the *relevant* changes which are caused due to changes in the package pool (some packages became removed and some became accepted since the last generation of the metapackages) I have split of the parts of the debdiff which are more easy to inspect to see what relevant changes in the dependencies have actually happended. Please feel free to inspect: debian-gis_0.0.2.debdiff_tasks.gz: diff -Nru debian-gis-0.0.1/debian-gis-tasks.desc debian-gis-0.0.2/debian-gis-tasks.desc --- debian-gis-0.0.1/debian-gis-tasks.desc 2010-07-07 12:10:02.0 +0200 +++ debian-gis-0.0.2/debian-gis-tasks.desc 2013-04-02 12:02:12.0 +0200 This shows in the most simple way what recommends were added / removed debian-gis_0.0.2.debdiff_control.gz: diff -Nru debian-gis-0.0.1/debian/changelog debian-gis-0.0.2/debian/changelog --- debian-gis-0.0.1/debian/changelog-2010-07-07 11:09:29.0 +0200 +++ debian-gis-0.0.2/debian/changelog-2013-04-02 11:50:56.0 +0200 diff -Nru debian-gis-0.0.1/debian/control debian-gis-0.0.2/debian/control --- debian-gis-0.0.1/debian/control---2010-07-07 12:10:03.0 +0200 +++ debian-gis-0.0.2/debian/control---2013-04-02 12:02:16.0 +0200 diff -Nru debian-gis-0.0.1/debian/control.stub debian-gis-0.0.2/debian/control.stub --- debian-gis-0.0.1/debian/control.stub--2010-07-07 11:28:01.0 +0200 +++ debian-gis-0.0.2/debian/control.stub--2013-04-02 11:59:57.0 +0200 This extract from debdiff shows the changes inside debian/. debian-gis_control_0.0.1-0.0.2.wdiff.gz: This was created using wdiff debian-gis-0.0.1/debian/control debian-gis-0.0.2/debian/control and is a better way to see the differences in the list of Recommends / Suggests inside the metapackages than a plain diff. Feel free to ask for any further information if needed. Kind regards and thanks for working on the Wheezy release Andreas. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/06/msg00323.html [2] http://blends.alioth.debian.org/gis/tasks/ unblock debian-gis/0.0.2 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.7 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-xenU-4814-i386 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash debian-gis_0.0.2.debdiff.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data debian-gis_0.0.2.debdiff_control.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data debian-gis_0.0.2.debdiff_tasks.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data debian-gis_control_0.0.1-0.0.2.wdiff.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#580170: [Help] Trying to upgrade mkgmap but failed with Java problem
Hi, I updated the packaging of mkgmap in SVN svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-grass/packages/mkgmap/trunk to recent packaging standards and latest upstream version. Unfortunately the build failed with /usr/bin/time --format 'Real: %E, %S+%U' java -XX:+UseCompressedOops -Xmx700m -cp build/classes uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main --tdbfile --family-id=909 --series-name=other map --description='A test map' /opt/data/uk-071010-1.osm.gz Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: uk/me/parabola/mkgmap/main/Main Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:217) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:321) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:294) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266) Could not find the main class: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main. Program will exit. Command exited with non-zero status 1 Real: 0:00.04, 0.00+0.03 make[1]: *** [makemap] Error 1 My guess is that this might be a quite simple problem for a Java expert who is comfortable with build.xml. Any hint to revitalise this de-facto orphaned OSM tool? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#580170: [Help] Trying to upgrade mkgmap but failed with Java problem
[for debian-java readers: the original mail explaining the problem is attached below] Hi Emmanuel, On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:15:55PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: The build doesn't compile the code, so you can't run the uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main class. You probably want to run the Ant dist target to build the project instead of using the makefile, see the comment in ./Makefile: # This is NOT used to build mkgmap. To build use ant. Ahhh, it seems javahelper ist tricked by the existence of the Makefile. I blindly assumed that javahelper would prefer ant over make which is obviously wrong. However, if I try ant it says: $ ant Buildfile: /home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/mkgmap/mkgmap-r2640/build.xml prepare: [mkdir] Created dir: /home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/mkgmap/mkgmap-r2640/build/classes [mkdir] Created dir: /home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/mkgmap/mkgmap-r2640/lib/optional ivy-availability: download-ivy: [mkdir] Created dir: /home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/mkgmap/mkgmap-r2640/lib/build [get] Getting: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.2.0/ivy-2.2.0.jar [get] To: /home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/mkgmap/mkgmap-r2640/lib/build/ivy-2.2.0.jar [get] Error getting http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.2.0/ivy-2.2.0.jar to /home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/mkgmap/mkgmap-r2640/lib/build/ivy-2.2.0.jar BUILD FAILED /home/tillea/debian-maintain/repack/mkgmap/mkgmap-r2640/build.xml:109: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method) at java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.doConnect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:327) at java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:193) at java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:180) at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:384) at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:546) at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:495) at sun.net.NetworkClient.doConnect(NetworkClient.java:178) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.openServer(HttpClient.java:409) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.openServer(HttpClient.java:530) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.init(HttpClient.java:240) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.New(HttpClient.java:321) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.New(HttpClient.java:338) at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getNewHttpClient(HttpURLConnection.java:935) at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.plainConnect(HttpURLConnection.java:876) at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.connect(HttpURLConnection.java:801) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.openConnection(Get.java:660) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.get(Get.java:579) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.run(Get.java:569) Total time: 1 second It seems maven is somehow involved even if at least to my limited knowledge this would use ratherpm.xml rather than build.xml. It seems I need to edit build.xml to tell ant to use local JAR files rather than trying to download anything. But what exactly? PS: Don't forget to CC debian-j...@lists.debian.org for your Java questions, there are plenty of people skilled in Java willing to help there :) Thanks for the additional hint - attaching a full quote of my original mail for debian-java readers below. Kind regards Andreas. begin original mail Hi, I updated the packaging of mkgmap in SVN svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-grass/packages/mkgmap/trunk to recent packaging standards and latest upstream version. Unfortunately the build failed with /usr/bin/time --format 'Real: %E, %S+%U' java -XX:+UseCompressedOops -Xmx700m -cp build/classes uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main --tdbfile --family-id=909 --series-name=other map --description='A test map' /opt/data/uk-071010-1.osm.gz Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: uk/me/parabola/mkgmap/main/Main Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:217) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:321) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:294) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266) Could not find the main class: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main. Program will exit. Command exited with non-zero status 1 Real: 0:00.04, 0.00+0.03 make[1]: *** [makemap] Error 1 My guess is that this might be a quite simple problem for a Java expert who is comfortable with build.xml. Any hint to revitalise this de-facto orphaned OSM tool? Kind regards Andreas. --
Re: Google Summer of Code Satus
Hi Alan, On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:57:02AM -0400, Alan Boudreault wrote: UbuntuGIS is working with DebianGIS and we share all work with them directly using the official git debian repository. Cool! That's exactly the way I would have suggested because it works like a charm in Debian Med team with BioLinux (which is also an Ubuntu derivative). Is there some documentation (some kind of policy document to make this more visible for newcomers)? From several postings here I had the impression that Debian resources might be underestimated / rarely used. However, we don't decide when a new release is uploaded to unstable. Well, the question is whether this is actually a *decision* or rather a matter of time resources. Francesco is the administrator of DebianGIS. I know Francesco from some DebConfs in the past and I think he would not mind to get some helping hand. While Debian GIS is not my main focus and I'm quite far from considering myself as a GIS expert my OSM activities have brought me closer to Debian GIS and I'd be happy to sponsor packages after coordination with Francesco. I have no idea who strict he considers his administrator role but from my experience in other teams structures in Debian are rather flat - provided that you are not breaking anything it is fine to do something instead of waiting until somebody else have done it. The DebianGIS process is also longer... so the softwares are not immediately pushed in unstable. This is exactly the point where I would like to help if anyhow possible. To start with this help I also ported the Debian GIS thermometer once written by Francesco most probably in the intention to make the cooperation more effective: http://blends.alioth.debian.org/gis/thermometer/ubuntu_debian-gis_thermometer.html The port is using common Debian Blends techniques and I think I provided some extra features not available previously. So I'm quite serious to support the DebianGIS - UbuntuGIS cooperation to the best of my skills. Any ideas how I can be of more help are perfectly welcome. Kind regards Andreas. On 13-08-29 09:51 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:19:08AM -0400, Jerome Villeneuve Larouche wrote: Georaster and OCI packages would be a really great addition to UbuntuGIS. It would be really nice if you could upload them to UbuntuGIS or just send them to me and I'll take care of it. Just a question: Is there any connection also to Debian GIS team[1]? I lived under the impression that it might make sense to work together but questions previous hints to work inside Debian were basically ignored. I'm just asking this question seriously because if this might not be the case I would start personally in checking with Debian GIS team how we could adopt from UbuntuGIS (which seems to be top down to me - but better than no connection at all). Thanks for enlightening Andreas. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianGis -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Google Summer of Code Satus
Hi Alan, On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 06:24:06PM -0400, Alan Boudreault wrote: Cool! That's exactly the way I would have suggested because it works like a charm in Debian Med team with BioLinux (which is also an Ubuntu derivative). Is there some documentation (some kind of policy document to make this more visible for newcomers)? From several postings here I had the impression that Debian resources might be underestimated / rarely used. Not sure what you mean. We extensively use the work of the DebianGIS team. However, we won't ask them to do the ubuntu tasks. With resources I mean for instance that somebody on this list was asking how to do some Java packaging and obviously had no idea that it might be straightforward to ask on debian-java mailing list. However, it could be that since I'm news to the various GIS teams I just do not know all the internals. I know Francesco from some DebConfs in the past and I think he would not mind to get some helping hand. While Debian GIS is not my main focus and I'm quite far from considering myself as a GIS expert my OSM activities have brought me closer to Debian GIS and I'd be happy to sponsor packages after coordination with Francesco. I have no idea who strict he considers his administrator role but from my experience in other teams structures in Debian are rather flat - provided that you are not breaking anything it is fine to do something instead of waiting until somebody else have done it. That would be very nice. Francesco has probably a lot more to do in addition of DebianGIS... and I have the same problem. I would be happy if someone could put some time in DebianGIS and UbuntuGIS. My main focus is Debian Med and general works on Blends. But I like to do some share of my time for *GIS. So just test me with your sponsoring requests or ideas to enhance the Blends framework for better use in *GIS. This is exactly the point where I would like to help if anyhow possible. To start with this help I also ported the Debian GIS thermometer once written by Francesco most probably in the intention to make the cooperation more effective: http://blends.alioth.debian.org/gis/thermometer/ubuntu_debian-gis_thermometer.html The port is using common Debian Blends techniques and I think I provided some extra features not available previously. So I'm quite serious to support the DebianGIS - UbuntuGIS cooperation to the best of my skills. Any ideas how I can be of more help are perfectly welcome. Great. I wonder if we could do an irc meeting with all debiangis and ubuntugis members. Talking together, we could probably figure out how everyone can help to. I could join a GIS IRC meeting in evening hours (European time zones). Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, updated. ce3bbd83f5665931f790d6f22d1866335273dbcd
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit ce3bbd83f5665931f790d6f22d1866335273dbcd
Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
Date: Thu Sep 12 23:06:46 2013 +0200
Add patch to get rid of perl warning
diff --git a/debian/patches/omit_defined.patch
b/debian/patches/omit_defined.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..19c343b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/omit_defined.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
+Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 21:34:03 +0200
+Description: Prevent useless warnings saying:
+ defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/rel2gpx line 669.
+ (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?)
+ defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/rel2gpx line 671.
+ (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?)
+ defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/rel2gpx line 677.
+ (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?)
+ ... so the defined was removed.
+
+--- rel2gpx.orig/rel2gpx.pl
rel2gpx/rel2gpx.pl
+@@ -666,15 +666,15 @@
+@{$self-{LON}} = reverse(@{$self-{LON}});
+@{$self-{NID}} = reverse(@{$self-{NID}});
+@{$self-{wayIds}} = reverse(@{$self-{wayIds}});
+- if (defined @{$self-{PREV}}){
++ if (@{$self-{PREV}}){
+ my @aTmp = (@{$self-{PREV}});
+- if (defined @{$self-{NEXT}}){
++ if (@{$self-{NEXT}}){
+ @{$self-{PREV}} = (@{$self-{NEXT}});
+ }else{
+ @{$self-{PREV}} = ();
+ }
+}else{
+- if (defined @{$self-{NEXT}}){
++ if (@{$self-{NEXT}}){
+ @{$self-{PREV}} = (@{$self-{NEXT}});
+ }else{
+ @{$self-{PREV}} = ();
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
new file mode 100644
index 000..6385457
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+omit_defined.patch
--
create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, pristine-tar, created. 000f7612608ae1791279958641947b014e758c7b
The branch, pristine-tar has been created at 000f7612608ae1791279958641947b014e758c7b (commit) - Shortlog commit 000f7612608ae1791279958641947b014e758c7b Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Thu Sep 12 21:31:09 2013 +0200 pristine-tar data for rel2gpx_0.26.orig.tar.gz --- -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[SCM] rel2gpx branch, master, created. 926ffc884a8090d73b8544924d46671610c74217
The branch, master has been created at 926ffc884a8090d73b8544924d46671610c74217 (commit) - Shortlog commit 926ffc884a8090d73b8544924d46671610c74217 Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Thu Sep 12 22:01:02 2013 +0200 Add initial packaging for rel2gpx --- -- create GPX-Tracks from OSM relation ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
