Re[2]: 4.0.14.2 Spell Checker Issues
Hello MAU, you wrote and made these points on the subject of - 4.0.14.2 Spell Checker Issues: > So, let's all be a > little more rigorous when testing and precise when reporting. Totally agree. for me -- Hunspell only (SSCE5532 extn renamed from dll to make it inoperative) then spell checking works in every way, no problems Hunspell disabled (extn renamed from dll) and SSCE5532.dll only words with a combination of numeric and alpha are underlined, all other words (right or wrongly spelled) are ignored (no underlining if wrong spelling). Options all left blank. Dictionary - EnglishBR changing options has no effect except for the ignore words with numeric which does correctly ignore them. Other speller not an option for me. (does not exist) My conclusion from this is that SSCE5532.dll is effective since it finds numeric/alpha errors and reacts when option to ignore this is selected. My best guess is that during initialisation process settings are being corrupted. What causes this in just a few systems is the hard bit. Maybe some other programs are corrupting these settings assuming they are held in the registry. I do accept resolving this is difficult unless you have a system with this error but I cannot believe it is due to the normal installation process as that is under the control of the msi installer. I am happy with Hunspell but there is a genuine problem to be sorted. Best regards, Graham -- Graham Howe mail mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 4.0.14.2 on windows version 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: 4.0.14.2 Spell Checker Issues
Hi MAU, On Tuesday, February 19, 2008 at 10:02:41 AM you wrote: M>>> it seems that that 'text is not being M>>> checked at all' (like if there was no speller), >> I have this exact problem as well. Using tinySpell here. M> But that is a completely different story my friend. TB 'officially' M> supports three different spelling engines I understand, pero nunn are working here. I have removed tinySpell from my stysem and re-botted to no avail as you cna see. I have tried to set the preferences in the speller and receive this: --- The Bat! --- Access violation at address 00407E3E in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address 0004. --- OK --- -- Regards, Maggie A garden never spurns those who enter it. Running Windows XP, 5, and emailing with The Bat! 4.0.14.2 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: 4.0.14.2 Spell Checker Issues
Hi MAU, On Tuesday, February 19, 2008 at 10:15:20 AM you wrote: M> So, even if they claim that it will work with /any/ Windows application, M> they also admit it may not be "compatible with your working M> environment". I'll just take it out. Maybe it *is* interfering. But the reason I put it on to begin with was because none of the mis-spelled words were being flagged. -- Regards, Maggie "There are no conditions of life to which a man cannot get accustomed, especially if he sees them accepted by everyone around him." -Anna Karenina Running Windows XP, 5, and emailing with The Bat! 4.0.14.2 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: 4.0.14.2 Spell Checker Issues
Hi MAU, On Tuesday, February 19, 2008 at 8:11:09 AM you wrote: M> I have just replied to Henk M. de M> Bruijn and, in his case and pending further clarification, it seems that M> that 'text is not being checked at all' (like if there was no speller), I have this exact problem as well. Using tinySpell here. -- Regards, Maggie We all believe in something greater than ourselves, even if it's just the blind forces of chance. Running Windows XP, 5, and emailing with The Bat! 4.0.14.2 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: 4.0.14.2 Spell Checker Issues
Hello MAU, you wrote and made these points on the subject of - 4.0.14.2 Spell Checker Issues: > I never said that these files with different dates may be the cause of > the problems. I just said that they made me wonder about how Ian (and > perhaps you and others) "have been doing upgrades along the years". Please don't think I am attacking your analysis, it is because of you I have a working Hunspell and happy with that. Re updating, I am very new to TB and so have only had the last version of v3 and have updated with v4 as it came along and betas. The update process is what I do for all programs so if there is a quirk in this then TB had better sort it for new sales. What seems very strange is I see reports of SSCE giving problems with capitalisation yet for me I cannot reproduce this but it is with numeric combinations. I have also seen others complain about the 'spelling' saga but if it doesn't work then it needs to be kept prominent so that eventually it gets attention from the TB programming team. I have tried almost every thing you have suggested and but for manually modifying the registry,which I do not have the skills or understanding to do, though I do use a very good registry clean program (Ace utilities) to correct obvious registry errors. Possibly, this could be a cause but I suspect others do not use this. Your help is much appreciated, believe me, Best regards, Graham -- Graham Howe mail mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 4.0.14.2 on windows version 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: 4.0.14.2 Spell Checker Issues
Hello MAU, you wrote and made these points on the subject of - 4.0.14.2 Spell Checker Issues: > And, if this all doesn't work... I will give up and you will not owe me > a beer :) I do hope this uncovers something but I do have to say that the dates of files are much the same in my dir and these were loaded direct from the TB pro msi. I have tried using just the BR ones and same result so I think the cause is not in these files. I am still of the opinion that there is something wrong in the SSCE engine. Reason, when I only use SSCE and make sure Hunspell is not there the spell checker finds words containg numeric. So, 44ffg is found as is ffg66 but ffg is seemingly correct! This indicates to me that SSCE engine is processing the words but for some reason internally not correctly. It is a frustrating mystery but hopefully in time the reason will be found, I do hope so. Best regards, Graham -- Graham Howe mail mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 4.0.14.2 on windows version 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html