[Bug 963490] Re: Cannot reauthorise my Twitter account
Ran a traceroute to Gwibber - looks like it's down.. alex@ubuntu:~$ traceroute gwibber.com traceroute to gwibber.com (69.163.171.124), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 2.128 ms 2.333 ms 3.333 ms 2 82.153.1.65 (82.153.1.65) 22.410 ms 22.907 ms 23.055 ms 3 91.85.10.49 (91.85.10.49) 24.656 ms 25.074 ms 25.274 ms 4 86.54.135.173 (86.54.135.173) 25.716 ms 26.798 ms 26.968 ms 5 fe6-17-core4.th.eclipse.net.uk (212.104.128.243) 28.876 ms 28.958 ms 28.963 ms 6 vl-7.lon-th2cr.spn.kcom.com (86.54.161.149) 30.306 ms 32.757 ms 19.112 ms 7 ldn-s10-rou-1041.UK.eurorings.net (134.222.146.52) 19.532 ms 21.201 ms 21.291 ms 8 te1-8.mpd02.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.14.113) 22.365 ms 22.415 ms 22.837 ms 9 te0-3-0-5.ccr22.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.0.93) 97.942 ms 98.869 ms 99.080 ms 10 te0-7-0-1.ccr22.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.80.125) 102.840 ms 103.377 ms 103.454 ms 11 te0-1-0-1.ccr22.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.44.53) 101.782 ms te0-0-0-3.ccr22.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.6.10) 101.965 ms te0-1-0-3.ccr22.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.133) 111.776 ms 12 te0-0-0-6.ccr22.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.26.2) 100.614 ms te0-2-0-3.ccr22.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.1.33) 138.680 ms te0-4-0-6.ccr22.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.42.29) 101.186 ms 13 te0-0-0-6.ccr22.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.24.22) 140.686 ms te0-3-0-2.ccr22.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.90) 143.480 ms te0-2-0-6.ccr21.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.45) 141.760 ms 14 te0-2-0-3.ccr22.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.45.2) 180.432 ms te0-3-0-6.ccr22.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.3.186) 174.613 ms te0-1-0-2.ccr22.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.6.138) 135.799 ms 15 te8-1.mag01.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.28.146) 174.768 ms te0-1-0-6.ccr22.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.238) 172.333 ms te8-1.mag01.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.28.146) 177.124 ms 16 38.122.20.218 (38.122.20.218) 177.321 ms te8-1.mag01.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.28.146) 174.733 ms 176.239 ms 17 * 38.122.20.218 (38.122.20.218) 177.251 ms 171.937 ms 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * 21 * * * 22 * * * 23 * * * 24 * * * 25 * * * 26 * * * 27 * * * 28 * * * 29 * * * 30 * * * -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963490 Title: Cannot reauthorise my Twitter account To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/963490/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 963490] Re: Cannot reauthorise my Twitter account
Tried pinging gwibber.com... looks like a comms issue. alex@ubuntu:~$ ping gwibber.com PING gwibber.com (69.163.171.124) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from apache2-pat.colts.dreamhost.com (69.163.171.124): icmp_seq=11 ttl=46 time=638 ms 64 bytes from apache2-pat.colts.dreamhost.com (69.163.171.124): icmp_seq=12 ttl=46 time=662 ms 64 bytes from apache2-pat.colts.dreamhost.com (69.163.171.124): icmp_seq=31 ttl=46 time=660 ms 64 bytes from apache2-pat.colts.dreamhost.com (69.163.171.124): icmp_seq=37 ttl=46 time=579 ms 64 bytes from apache2-pat.colts.dreamhost.com (69.163.171.124): icmp_seq=38 ttl=46 time=628 ms 64 bytes from apache2-pat.colts.dreamhost.com (69.163.171.124): icmp_seq=43 ttl=46 time=1017 ms 64 bytes from apache2-pat.colts.dreamhost.com (69.163.171.124): icmp_seq=45 ttl=46 time=659 ms 64 bytes from apache2-pat.colts.dreamhost.com (69.163.171.124): icmp_seq=50 ttl=46 time=644 ms 64 bytes from apache2-pat.colts.dreamhost.com (69.163.171.124): icmp_seq=52 ttl=46 time=583 ms 64 bytes from apache2-pat.colts.dreamhost.com (69.163.171.124): icmp_seq=55 ttl=46 time=850 ms ^C --- gwibber.com ping statistics --- 60 packets transmitted, 10 received, 83% packet loss, time 63920ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 579.506/692.450/1017.629/129.467 ms, pipe 2 alex@ubuntu:~$ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963490 Title: Cannot reauthorise my Twitter account To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/963490/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 963490] [NEW] Cannot reauthorise my Twitter account
Public bug reported: Gwinbber wouldn't start - I had to remove pretty much everything from CouchDB info, managed to get my Facebook account back.. but when I tried reauthorising to Twitter - I got the following after entering my userid and password. Redirecting you back to the application. This may take a few moments. If your browser doesn't redirect you please click here to continue You can revoke access to any application at any time from the Applications tab of your Settings page. By authorizing an application you continue to operate under Twitter's Terms of Service. In particular, some usage information will be shared back with Twitter. For more, see our Privacy Policy. Never went on from there. Got the following error. Unable to load page Problem occurred while loading the URL http://gwibber.com/0/auth.html?oauth_token=H8JHxksSbdpMIE3QIeaiLDoPe6x31SkgYCzp2ioo&oauth_verifier=y2tdanfEsF80hsRZDbLHE76egSlFQK21CYzu2sW72c Connection terminated unexpectedly Clicked "try again"... Unable to load page Problem occurred while loading the URL http://gwibber.com/0/auth.html?oauth_token=H8JHxksSbdpMIE3QIeaiLDoPe6x31SkgYCzp2ioo&oauth_verifier=y2tdanfEsF80hsRZDbLHE76egSlFQK21CYzu2sW72c Cannot connect to destination Please fix. ** Affects: gwibber (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963490 Title: Cannot reauthorise my Twitter account To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/963490/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926645] Re: After accepting all updates on 4 Feb 2012, gwibber broken, and won't start.
I tried again - and it just showed a spinny when trying to authorise Gwibber. I am now reduced to having to use Twiter's website. Please fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926645 Title: After accepting all updates on 4 Feb 2012, gwibber broken, and won't start. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/926645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926645] Re: After accepting all updates on 4 Feb 2012, gwibber broken, and won't start.
This error occurred when trying to reauthorise my account - Problem occurred while loading the URL http://gwibber.com/0/auth.html?oauth_token=ep3quWfi8z4C3LhAHu2s9QGYNpzbEA0a5ipsk&oauth_verifier=Rul9weQ7XDFdakQ9fv7RprHgQXRDtfl1U6MSZxpxo Cannot connect to destination It should still at least let Gwibber START! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926645 Title: After accepting all updates on 4 Feb 2012, gwibber broken, and won't start. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/926645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926645] Re: After accepting all updates on 4 Feb 2012, gwibber broken, and won't start.
It broke again.
@ubuntu:~$ gwibber
Updating...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/gwibber", line 67, in
client.Client()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/client.py", line 448, in
__init__
self.w = GwibberClient()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/client.py", line 42, in
__init__
if len(json.loads(self.service.GetAccounts())) == 0:
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/proxies.py", line 140, in __call__
**keywords)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/connection.py", line 620, in
call_blocking
message, timeout)
dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Python.socket.error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/service.py", line 702, in _message_cb
retval = candidate_method(self, *args, **keywords)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/microblog/dispatcher.py", line
500, in GetAccounts
for account in self.accounts.get_records(COUCH_TYPE_ACCOUNT, True):
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/desktopcouch/records/server_base.py",
line 482, in get_records
exists = self.view_exists(view_name, design_doc)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/desktopcouch/records/server_base.py",
line 429, in view_exists
self.with_reconnects(self.db.__getitem__, doc_id)["views"]
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/desktopcouch/records/server_base.py",
line 164, in with_reconnects
return func(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/couchdb/client.py", line 316, in
__getitem__
resp, data = self.resource.get(id)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/couchdb/client.py", line 978, in get
return self._request('GET', path, headers=headers, **params)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/couchdb/client.py", line 1014, in _request
resp, data = _make_request()
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/couchdb/client.py", line 1009, in
_make_request
body=body, headers=headers)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/httplib2/__init__.py", line 1444, in
request
(response, content) = self._request(conn, authority, uri, request_uri,
method, body, headers, redirections, cachekey)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/httplib2/__init__.py", line 1196, in
_request
(response, content) = self._conn_request(conn, request_uri, method, body,
headers)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/httplib2/__init__.py", line 1132, in
_conn_request
conn.connect()
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/httplib2/__init__.py", line 798, in connect
raise socket.error, msg
error: [Errno 111] Connection refused
alex@ubuntu:~$
FIX IT ALREADY!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926645
Title:
After accepting all updates on 4 Feb 2012, gwibber broken, and won't
start.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/926645/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 958020] [NEW] After closing, I have to either kill beam.smp or restart computer before going back in
Public bug reported: Gwibber uses a lot of CPU and memory - I can only use it once though before I have to reboot - am not able to reliably quit and restart within the same session. This needs fixing. ** Affects: gwibber (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/958020 Title: After closing, I have to either kill beam.smp or restart computer before going back in To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/958020/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926645] Re: After accepting all updates on 4 Feb 2012, gwibber broken, and won't start.
Managed to get Gwibber started again after deleting the gwibber_messages DB and my Twitter account defn... then reauth'd the app. A bit of a mess.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926645 Title: After accepting all updates on 4 Feb 2012, gwibber broken, and won't start. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/926645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926645] Re: After accepting all updates on 4 Feb 2012, gwibber broken, and won't start.
Gwibber broke again. Tried uninstalling and reinstalling again - alex@ubuntu:~$ killall pidgin alex@ubuntu:~$ gwibber Removing stale, deceptive pid file. Apache CouchDB has started, time to relax. Browse your desktop CouchDB at file:///home/alex/.local/share/desktop-couch/couchdb.html Updating... ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on com.Gwibber.Service:/com/gwibber/Service: dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/gwibber", line 67, in client.Client() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/client.py", line 448, in __init__ self.w = GwibberClient() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/client.py", line 30, in __init__ self.model = gwui.Model() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/gwui.py", line 44, in __init__ self.services = json.loads(self.daemon.GetServices()) File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/proxies.py", line 68, in __call__ return self._proxy_method(*args, **keywords) File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/proxies.py", line 140, in __call__ **keywords) File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/connection.py", line 620, in call_blocking message, timeout) dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken. alex@ubuntu:~$ Broken. Please fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926645 Title: After accepting all updates on 4 Feb 2012, gwibber broken, and won't start. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/926645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926645] Re: After accepting all updates on 4 Feb 2012, gwibber broken, and won't start.
Uninstalled and reinstalled from Software Centre - this appears to have got the app working. Why does this happen? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926645 Title: After accepting all updates on 4 Feb 2012, gwibber broken, and won't start. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/926645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926645] Re: After accepting all updates on 4 Feb 2012, gwibber broken, and won't start.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926645 Title: After accepting all updates on 4 Feb 2012, gwibber broken, and won't start. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/926645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926645] [NEW] After accepting all updates on 4 Feb 2012, gwibber broken, and won't start.
Public bug reported: I tried to start gwibber from commandline after accepting all Ubuntu updates supplied on 04 Feb 2012. Running Lucid. Failed. Here's my commandline log. alex@ubuntu:~$ gwibber Removing stale, deceptive pid file. Apache CouchDB has started, time to relax. Browse your desktop CouchDB at file:///home/alex/.local/share/desktop-couch/couchdb.html No dbus monitor yet Updating... Updating... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/gwibber", line 67, in client.Client() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/client.py", line 448, in __init__ self.w = GwibberClient() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/client.py", line 59, in __init__ self.setup_ui() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/client.py", line 145, in setup_ui self.stream_view.set_state(self.model.settings["streams"] or DEFAULT_SETTINGS["streams"]) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/gwui.py", line 492, in set_state for item in state: self.new_stream(item) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/gwui.py", line 486, in new_stream if state: item.set_state(state) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/gwui.py", line 626, in set_state self.update() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/gwui.py", line 619, in update self.message_view.render([self.selected_stream["view"]]) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/gwui.py", line 707, in render message = item['doc'] KeyError: 'doc' alex@ubuntu:~$ gwibber Updating... Updating... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/gwibber", line 67, in client.Client() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/client.py", line 448, in __init__ self.w = GwibberClient() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/client.py", line 59, in __init__ self.setup_ui() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/client.py", line 145, in setup_ui self.stream_view.set_state(self.model.settings["streams"] or DEFAULT_SETTINGS["streams"]) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/gwui.py", line 492, in set_state for item in state: self.new_stream(item) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/gwui.py", line 486, in new_stream if state: item.set_state(state) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/gwui.py", line 626, in set_state self.update() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/gwui.py", line 619, in update self.message_view.render([self.selected_stream["view"]]) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/gwui.py", line 707, in render message = item['doc'] KeyError: 'doc' alex@ubuntu:~$ ubuntu-bug gwibber alex@ubuntu:~$ I now don't have a working Gwibber instance. Am going to try removing and readding it from Software Centre. alex@ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS Release:10.04 alex@ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy gwibber gwibber: Installed: 2.30.3-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 2.30.3-0ubuntu2 Version table: *** 2.30.3-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.30.0.1-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages Application should just WORK! Please fix it ASAP. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gwibber 2.30.3-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-38.83-generic 2.6.32.52+drm33.21 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-38-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Feb 4 12:50:59 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook-Remix 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.4) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gwibber ** Affects: gwibber (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid ubuntu-une -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926645 Title: After accepting all updates on 4 Feb 2012, gwibber broken, and won't start. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/926645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 875538] Re: [Firefox 3.6.23] Impossible to open firefox because firefox-bin process is still running
The problem you have is that a key bit of the Adobe spec... That of SWF verification... Is NOT publicly specified. It's also used he/ily by the BBC and Channel 4 in iPlayer and 4OD. Rather critical needs... - Original message - > When this problem first manifested itself, I made some comments in the > 'bug' thread I started regarding my need to switch back to MS Vista that > were somewhat aggravated. I would just like to take this moment to > apologise to all Ubuntu developers for what I said. The problem is that > the Flash update came right at the wrong time, right when I was in the > middle of a very important operation. It took me two weeks to finish > what I was doing, and in that time I never had so many problems with my > machine until I reloaded the OEM version of Vista that came with my > computer. I couldn't wait to switch back to the Ubuntu world again. > > For the record, I think that Ubuntu is the best breath of fresh air that > the PC world has ever seen. It makes anything that Microsoft ever > created look sick by comparison, and I truly hope you all keep up the > good work. If I wasn't so busy writing a new GUI based OS for FreeDOS, I > would help you myself, but there are just so many hours in a day and I > can't split them up any more. > > Also, perhaps the Ubuntu community should seriously look into the > possibility of writing it's own Flash player; one that is unique to this > OS. That would eliminate all further problems from using outside > software. Since we would not be changing the Flash format, just playing > the files, copyright issues should not be a problem, particularly if it > can be proven that the current Flash player from Adobe does not function > properly in Linux because of a premeditated effort to remove an > important facet of Internet use to the entire Linux community. If Adobe > goes after Linux for any infringement suit, then we can always come back > on them for an anti-trust suit, in that they are attempting to generate > a 100% monopoly that is made only to benefit 'for profit' corporations > like Microsoft and Apple. Taking this action would eliminate all future > Flash revision situations like this in the future, as we would be able > to make changes on-the-fly. > > Sorry about the thread drift guys, but it was important for me to let > you all know how I really feel. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a > duplicate bug report (872714). > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875538 > > Title: > [Firefox 3.6.23] Impossible to open firefox because firefox-bin > process is still running > > Status in “firefox” package in Ubuntu: > Invalid > Status in “flashplugin-nonfree” package in Ubuntu: > Invalid > Status in “firefox” source package in Lucid: > Triaged > Status in “flashplugin-nonfree” source package in Lucid: > Triaged > Status in “firefox” source package in Maverick: > Triaged > Status in “flashplugin-nonfree” source package in Maverick: > Triaged > > Bug description: > After upgrading firefox to version 3.6.23 few days ago, firefox does > not work properly. > > At firt use after computer starting, firefox works well. > It is possible to close firefox without any issue. > But at second starting, firefox indicates it is impossible to launch > firefox because firefox-bin process is still running. The workaround is > to restart the computer, or simply kill the firefox-bin process. > > This behaviour happened right after upgrading firefox to version > 3.6.23, and is systematic with the profil user I use (it's an admin > user). > > I tested with another profil (non admin) on the computer: The problem > has not been reproduced. > > System is 10.04 LTS (kernel 2.6.32-33 generic) > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/875538/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875538 Title: [Firefox 3.6.23] Impossible to open firefox because firefox-bin process is still running To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/875538/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 875538] Re: [Firefox 3.6.23] Impossible to open firefox because firefox-bin process is still running
i'm on lucid as well. Was referring to Flash. flash 10.0.x ios too old for most sites with video. Fallback from Flash 11 needs to be gtr than Flash 10.1 and it isn't. - Original message - > Some of us are already using a lower version of Ubuntu. I use Lucid > 10.04. Don't want to mess with that. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a > duplicate bug report (872714). > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875538 > > Title: > [Firefox 3.6.23] Impossible to open firefox because firefox-bin > process is still running > > Status in “firefox” package in Ubuntu: > Invalid > Status in “flashplugin-nonfree” package in Ubuntu: > Invalid > Status in “firefox” source package in Lucid: > Triaged > Status in “flashplugin-nonfree” source package in Lucid: > Triaged > Status in “firefox” source package in Maverick: > Triaged > Status in “flashplugin-nonfree” source package in Maverick: > Triaged > > Bug description: > After upgrading firefox to version 3.6.23 few days ago, firefox does > not work properly. > > At firt use after computer starting, firefox works well. > It is possible to close firefox without any issue. > But at second starting, firefox indicates it is impossible to launch > firefox because firefox-bin process is still running. The workaround is > to restart the computer, or simply kill the firefox-bin process. > > This behaviour happened right after upgrading firefox to version > 3.6.23, and is systematic with the profil user I use (it's an admin > user). > > I tested with another profil (non admin) on the computer: The problem > has not been reproduced. > > System is 10.04 LTS (kernel 2.6.32-33 generic) > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/875538/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875538 Title: [Firefox 3.6.23] Impossible to open firefox because firefox-bin process is still running To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/875538/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 875538] Re: [Firefox 3.6.23] Impossible to open firefox because firefox-bin process is still running
May I suggest therefore that someone package up Flash 10.3 to give us something to easily roll back to? needs pkg pbug is already filed. means other stuff CAN be updated. - Original message - > While this is not a fix, it is a workaround for those who can't afford > to have their machine down for any length of time. Simply dump the > recent Flash upgrade, and go back one step and the problem is > eradicated. I did this by loading SuperOS, Version Maverick 10.10 which > has the older Flash package. I have disabled all Ubuntu updates, and > the problem is completely eliminated and there is no loss of > functionality using the older Flash system. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a > duplicate bug report (872714). > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875538 > > Title: > [Firefox 3.6.23] Impossible to open firefox because firefox-bin > process is still running > > Status in “firefox” package in Ubuntu: > Invalid > Status in “flashplugin-nonfree” package in Ubuntu: > Invalid > Status in “firefox” source package in Lucid: > Triaged > Status in “flashplugin-nonfree” source package in Lucid: > Triaged > Status in “firefox” source package in Maverick: > Triaged > Status in “flashplugin-nonfree” source package in Maverick: > Triaged > > Bug description: > After upgrading firefox to version 3.6.23 few days ago, firefox does > not work properly. > > At firt use after computer starting, firefox works well. > It is possible to close firefox without any issue. > But at second starting, firefox indicates it is impossible to launch > firefox because firefox-bin process is still running. The workaround is > to restart the computer, or simply kill the firefox-bin process. > > This behaviour happened right after upgrading firefox to version > 3.6.23, and is systematic with the profil user I use (it's an admin > user). > > I tested with another profil (non admin) on the computer: The problem > has not been reproduced. > > System is 10.04 LTS (kernel 2.6.32-33 generic) > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/875538/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875538 Title: [Firefox 3.6.23] Impossible to open firefox because firefox-bin process is still running To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/875538/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886302] Re: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks
Oh the Beeb's front, they're investigating the issues - my case number is BBC iPlayer - Case number CAS-1085162-WX025B BBC's own FAQ page - http://iplayerhelp.external.bbc.co.uk/help/announcements/flash_upgrade - suggests it may be possible to drop down to a minimum version of 10.1... as previously stated... it would behoove Ubuntu devs to get flashplugin- installer to offer 10.2 and 10.3 asap. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886302 Title: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/886302/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886302] Re: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks
Just found this Reddit thread - http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/lu5ke/adobe_flash_can_suck_my_balls/ Specifically this comment "So, not 11 then which had the most recent and finally legitimately good updates to hardware acceleration and 64bit support? Huh? Not in Linux, according to a reply that I got from Adobe. Flashplayer 10.3 had VDPAU hardware-acceleration that worked with recent Nvidia chipsets (enabled by creating the file /etc/adobe/mms.cfg containing EnableLinuxHWVideoDecode=1) but that's been removed from Flashplayer 11 due to "security problems". " Please could devs look at this package - at least then a usable and easily accessible solution is there? They ripped out the rendering but left the decoding logic (thank goodness) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886302 Title: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/886302/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886302] Re: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks
Thinking back to the experience on iPlayer when the change was made, the situation was exacerbated by the Flash 10 package being updated to Flash 11 *in place*, as opposed to a new Flash 11 package being built and adobe-flashplugin just repointed to it. Doing it this way rather than Flash 11 named as Flash 10 in Software Centre etc - the contents changed but the pkg remaining the same - would have meant it might have been possible to force version within Synaptic - or offer the two versions of Flash in Software Centre. There is an active bug reported for Android on the iPlayer's help pages, which recommend they back down to 10.3 - but 10.3 is available as an app in the Android store. Win users have an installer to do the dirty work - surely it would be best for Ubuntu to offer a backout package just while Adobe get themselves organised... There's also the issue of large deployments when a showstopping bug is released within Flash... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886302 Title: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/886302/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886302] Re: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks
Oh - also, the removal of Stage Video for NVIDIA was a deliberate decision by Adobe - which was done between Beta and Gold release... Not offering a backout without stepping into the murky world of tarballs and monitoring for patches does seem a little remiss IMHO. And scary for less technical users. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886302 Title: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/886302/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 886302] Re: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks
Probably not, but while unsupported, an option to fix at Flash 10.2 or 10.3 until Adobe reintroduce Stage Video (whatever they call it) would enable low power machines to actually *use* iPlayer, Youtube, Demand5, 4OD and other streaming video-on-Flash smoothly. this is the crux of the issue. A stopgap... Yes... But a needed one. and much better a package so nothing breaks when accepting the upgrade to 12.04. either that or whitelist Totem-plugins for full H264 from the Beeb and other broadcasters... So nvidia+atom users can actually USE their kit. - Original message - > Using Flash 10 instead of Flash 11 will break the (probably now > hundreds, if not thousands) of websites that only work with Flash 11, > either because they use features only present in major version 11, or > because they trigger bugs that were fixed in major version 11 (or in > some incremental release after that). Using Flash 10 is therefore not a > generally good solution to the problem of this one website not working. > The goal of making Flash work better for users in general would not be > served significantly by fixing this bug, and the goal of making Flash > work better for users in your specific situation, while it would be > served by fixing this, would not be served particularly well. > > That is not to say that this bug should not be fixed. It might well be > the case that there is significant benefit to giving users the ability > and option to choose Flash 10 (packaged for Ubuntu) as well as Flash 11 > (packaged for Ubuntu). I am not convinced that this is the case, but I > hope this post should not be taken as an argument against it. > > Either the website should be fixed, or Flash 11 should be fixed > (depending on which contains the bug). If the website is fixed, then no > one needs to update anything. If Flash 11 is fixed, the update will > presumably be available to all users of all supported Ubuntu releases, > including Ubuntu 12.04 LTS once it's out (whether the fix happens before > or after its release). This is because Adobe Flash is proprietary and > there is no way for Ubuntu developers to backport just fixes for > security vulnerabilities and serious security/stability bugs, creating > Ubuntu-specific versions (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates). > Since this cannot be done, updates to Flash in Ubuntu get new features > (and new bugs) as well as fixes for serious bugs. > > Have you actually replaced Flash 11 on your system with Flash 10 to see > if that actually fixes the problem on the BBC website? > > "Also, am thinking of other users as well. And when or if Adobe manage > to get Stage Video/3D/whatever sorted - would prefer to just accept the > update through Update Manager..." > > Are you saying you think Adobe will release additional updates for Flash > 10 providing major functionality changes? > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886302 > > Title: > [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current > breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks > > Status in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > With Flash 11 current version and package, Adobe stripped out all the > experimental accelerated rendering support for NVIDIA ION and other > NVIDIA chipsets. While Youtube will happily roll back to software accel > for NVIDIA users, iPlayer won't. Results seen are Video > compressed, then tries to expand... then freezes completely, then > iPlayer will not play out video at all - but no issues with audio. > > Effectively, iPlayer is completely unusable if on Intel Atom+NVIDIA > equipment running Ubuntu 10.04 and Flash 11. This is a massive > regression and dealbreaker for British Ubuntu users. > > The BBC recently updated their playback client, relying on Stage 3D > logic to present the transport controls as an overlay - interacting > with issues in the Linux version of Flash 11; Windows and Mac have > this acceleration logic, according to their own release notes. > > Intel chipsets (reliant on software) are perfectly OK. > > Accelerated rendering WAS available in Flash 10.3 and the beta > versions of Flash 11. > > The BBC also now stipulate that Flash 10.1 is the minimum version > required to play content on iPlayer - the only backout Force Install > option offered is Flash 10.0.42 or thereabouts. > > Please could you arrange packaging of Adobe Flash 10.3 - > > http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/completion/?installer=Flash_Player_10_for_other_Linux_(.tar.gz) > > .. so that a functional backward option is available? > > This issue also may help with issues on 4OD as well. > > > Thanks > > My kit - Lenovo Ideapad S12, Ubuntu 10.04LTS with all updates. > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/886302/+subscriptions
Re: [Bug 886302] Re: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks
Not confident. And would prefer to rely on official packages - especially when it came to eventually accepting 12.04.1 next year... Also, am thinking of other users as well. And when or if Adobe manage to get Stage Video/3D/whatever sorted - would prefer to just accept the update through Update Manager... On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 22:13 +, Eliah Kagan wrote: > Since the bug is either in Adobe Flash or in the BBC's flash content, > perhaps Adobe and the BBC could work together to ameliorate the > problem... > > How does this break *any* machines? Can't you just remove the Flash > player as packaged for Ubuntu, and install it from > http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/completion/?installer=Flash_Player_10_for_other_Linux_(.tar.gz) > (the link you yourself provided)? > -- Alex Cockell a...@acockell.eclipse.co.uk -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886302 Title: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/886302/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 886302] Re: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks
But it means i have to buy a new computer to watch iplayer content. Please could canonical and the bbc discuss.. This breaks an entire class of machines. - Original message - > Breaking a single site that is incompatible with the present version > does not make the unavailability of the previous version a non-wishlist > bug. The bug is either in the BBC site's flash content or in Flash 11. > This is a genuine wishlist item and I hope it is "fixed" but it is > certainly nothing more than that, judging from the description you have > provided. > > Furthermore, all needs-packaging requests are given wishlist importance, > regardless of how positive the consequences would be of addressing them > (see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Specs/NeedsPackagingBugs for > details). > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886302 > > Title: > [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current > breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks > > Status in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > With Flash 11 current version and package, Adobe stripped out all the > experimental accelerated rendering support for NVIDIA ION and other > NVIDIA chipsets. While Youtube will happily roll back to software accel > for NVIDIA users, iPlayer won't. Results seen are Video > compressed, then tries to expand... then freezes completely, then > iPlayer will not play out video at all - but no issues with audio. > > Effectively, iPlayer is completely unusable if on Intel Atom+NVIDIA > equipment running Ubuntu 10.04 and Flash 11. This is a massive > regression and dealbreaker for British Ubuntu users. > > The BBC recently updated their playback client, relying on Stage 3D > logic to present the transport controls as an overlay - interacting > with issues in the Linux version of Flash 11; Windows and Mac have > this acceleration logic, according to their own release notes. > > Intel chipsets (reliant on software) are perfectly OK. > > Accelerated rendering WAS available in Flash 10.3 and the beta > versions of Flash 11. > > The BBC also now stipulate that Flash 10.1 is the minimum version > required to play content on iPlayer - the only backout Force Install > option offered is Flash 10.0.42 or thereabouts. > > Please could you arrange packaging of Adobe Flash 10.3 - > > http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/completion/?installer=Flash_Player_10_for_other_Linux_(.tar.gz) > > .. so that a functional backward option is available? > > This issue also may help with issues on 4OD as well. > > > Thanks > > My kit - Lenovo Ideapad S12, Ubuntu 10.04LTS with all updates. > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/886302/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886302 Title: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/886302/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 886302] Re: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks
This is not a wishlist item. the adobe flash 10 p,kg being updated to v11 instead of a new pkg being rolled has meant thart due to the changes in Flash, netbooks with N270 cpu and nvidia ion gpus cannot eun bbc iplayer. Please redefine as active bug. This has broken bbc iplayer - Original message - > *** This is an automated message *** > > This bug is tagged needs-packaging which identifies it as a request for > a new package in Ubuntu. As a part of the managing needs-packaging bug > reports specification, > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Specs/NeedsPackagingBugs, all needs- > packaging bug reports have Wishlist importance. Subsequently, I'm > setting this bug's status to Wishlist. > > ** Changed in: ubuntu > Importance: Undecided => Wishlist > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886302 > > Title: > [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current > breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks > > Status in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > With Flash 11 current version and package, Adobe stripped out all the > experimental accelerated rendering support for NVIDIA ION and other > NVIDIA chipsets. While Youtube will happily roll back to software accel > for NVIDIA users, iPlayer won't. Results seen are Video > compressed, then tries to expand... then freezes completely, then > iPlayer will not play out video at all - but no issues with audio. > > Effectively, iPlayer is completely unusable if on Intel Atom+NVIDIA > equipment running Ubuntu 10.04 and Flash 11. This is a massive > regression and dealbreaker for British Ubuntu users. > > The BBC recently updated their playback client, relying on Stage 3D > logic to present the transport controls as an overlay - interacting > with issues in the Linux version of Flash 11; Windows and Mac have > this acceleration logic, according to their own release notes. > > Intel chipsets (reliant on software) are perfectly OK. > > Accelerated rendering WAS available in Flash 10.3 and the beta > versions of Flash 11. > > The BBC also now stipulate that Flash 10.1 is the minimum version > required to play content on iPlayer - the only backout Force Install > option offered is Flash 10.0.42 or thereabouts. > > Please could you arrange packaging of Adobe Flash 10.3 - > > http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/completion/?installer=Flash_Player_10_for_other_Linux_(.tar.gz) > > .. so that a functional backward option is available? > > This issue also may help with issues on 4OD as well. > > > Thanks > > My kit - Lenovo Ideapad S12, Ubuntu 10.04LTS with all updates. > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/886302/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886302 Title: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/886302/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886302] Re: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks
I have complained to the BBC, but as yet I have not received case numbers from them; here are threads where this issue is discussed. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1659949&highlight=iplayer http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=54112530&postcount=3 There are others. WOuld it also be possible for Canonical to approach the BBC and liaise with them - as it appears that iPlayer is now completely broken for Linux+Nvidia users. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886302 Title: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/886302/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886302] Re: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks
The most recent older version (available under flashplugin-installer) is 10.0.42... too far out of date. 10.3 was released on 21st August 2011. Please assist ASAP - I'm having to view iPlayer content on my R61 - but would like the option on my netbook. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886302 Title: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/886302/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886302] [NEW] [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks
Public bug reported: With Flash 11 current version and package, Adobe stripped out all the experimental accelerated rendering support for NVIDIA ION and other NVIDIA chipsets. While Youtube will happily roll back to software accel for NVIDIA users, iPlayer won't. Results seen are Video compressed, then tries to expand... then freezes completely, then iPlayer will not play out video at all - but no issues with audio. Effectively, iPlayer is completely unusable if on Intel Atom+NVIDIA equipment running Ubuntu 10.04 and Flash 11. This is a massive regression and dealbreaker for British Ubuntu users. The BBC recently updated their playback client, relying on Stage 3D logic to present the transport controls as an overlay - interacting with issues in the Linux version of Flash 11; Windows and Mac have this acceleration logic, according to their own release notes. Intel chipsets (reliant on software) are perfectly OK. Accelerated rendering WAS available in Flash 10.3 and the beta versions of Flash 11. The BBC also now stipulate that Flash 10.1 is the minimum version required to play content on iPlayer - the only backout Force Install option offered is Flash 10.0.42 or thereabouts. Please could you arrange packaging of Adobe Flash 10.3 - http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/completion/?installer=Flash_Player_10_for_other_Linux_(.tar.gz) .. so that a functional backward option is available? This issue also may help with issues on 4OD as well. Thanks My kit - Lenovo Ideapad S12, Ubuntu 10.04LTS with all updates. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886302 Title: [needs-packaging] - Adobe Flash 10.3.183.10 - as Flash 11 current breaks BBC iPlayer for NVIDIA ION-equipped netbooks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/886302/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 875538] Re: [Firefox 3.6.23] Impossible to open firefox because firefox-bin process is still running
I was testing the changes made to BBC iPlayer today - they're making more use of Stage Video stuff - which messes around with Flash and NVIDIA... Adobe's code... And lo and behold, I had to kill firefox-bin manually. Looks like there is a lot of interaction with bugs in Flash... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875538 Title: [Firefox 3.6.23] Impossible to open firefox because firefox-bin process is still running To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/875538/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 875538] Re: [Firefox 3.6.23] Impossible to open firefox because firefox-bin process is still running
I concur. What I would also expect to see is Firefox maxing out both cores for approx 2-5 seconds as it unloads firefox-bin and plugin- container - this CPU peak does NOT happen if the user has been viewing Flash 11 content off Youtube... from their standard player. If I use iPlayer or 4OD - it seems to close down cleanly. There are also other times when the cleardown happens neatly. It's made more complex in that Youtube seem to use a number of playout clients. Re the unload cycle - it's almost like the UI is the only thing that unloads when the problem is experienced. You may have received the issue earlier - IF the problem didn't stand in the way of ubuntu-bug being able to submit the content. However, if Firefox cannot reopen and open the new tab - that incident is never logged. To submit mine, I had to kill Firefox-bin, then go and look at ubuntu-bug's doccos on how to log the data to the local filesystem, then once back in Firefox, get it to replay the incodent and push the data. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875538 Title: [Firefox 3.6.23] Impossible to open firefox because firefox-bin process is still running To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/875538/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 872714] profiles.ini.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/872714/+attachment/2545518/+files/profiles.ini.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872714 Title: After playing several clips in Flash 11, Firefox wouldn't quit cleanly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/872714/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 872714] profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/872714/+attachment/2545517/+files/profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872714 Title: After playing several clips in Flash 11, Firefox wouldn't quit cleanly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/872714/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 872714] ExtensionSummary.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/872714/+attachment/2545516/+files/ExtensionSummary.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872714 Title: After playing several clips in Flash 11, Firefox wouldn't quit cleanly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/872714/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 872714] Re: After playing several clips in Flash 11, Firefox wouldn't quit cleanly.
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: I played several clips in Youtube, using Flash 11... closed the tabs individually, then closed Firefox by means of File/Quit. I expected this to shut Firefox dowqn completely. It didn't, but left the firefox- bin process in a "futex-no".. something state. Please fix. Firefox version is 3.6.23. Addons are Ad-blocker and noscript. Running Ubuntu 10.04.3LTS, all updates. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: firefox 3.6.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-34.77-generic 2.6.32.44+drm33.19 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-34-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia wl Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Oct 12 09:04:07 2011 FirefoxPackages: firefox 3.6.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 firefox-gnome-support 3.6.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 firefox-branding 3.6.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 abroswer N/A abrowser-branding N/A InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook-Remix 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.4) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox + --- + Architecture: i386 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 + FirefoxPackages: + firefox 3.6.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 + firefox-gnome-support 3.6.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 + firefox-branding 3.6.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 + abroswer N/A + abrowser-branding N/A + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook-Remix 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.4) + NonfreeKernelModules: wl nvidia + Package: firefox 3.6.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 + PackageArchitecture: i386 + ProcEnviron: + LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-34.77-generic 2.6.32.44+drm33.19 + Tags: lucid ubuntu-une + Uname: Linux 2.6.32-34-generic i686 + UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/872714/+attachment/2545515/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872714 Title: After playing several clips in Flash 11, Firefox wouldn't quit cleanly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/872714/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 872714] Re: After playing several clips in Flash 11, Firefox wouldn't quit cleanly.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872714 Title: After playing several clips in Flash 11, Firefox wouldn't quit cleanly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/872714/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 872714] [NEW] After playing several clips in Flash 11, Firefox wouldn't quit cleanly.
Public bug reported: I played several clips in Youtube, using Flash 11... closed the tabs individually, then closed Firefox by means of File/Quit. I expected this to shut Firefox dowqn completely. It didn't, but left the firefox- bin process in a "futex-no".. something state. Please fix. Firefox version is 3.6.23. Addons are Ad-blocker and noscript. Running Ubuntu 10.04.3LTS, all updates. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: firefox 3.6.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-34.77-generic 2.6.32.44+drm33.19 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-34-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia wl Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Oct 12 09:04:07 2011 FirefoxPackages: firefox 3.6.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 firefox-gnome-support 3.6.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 firefox-branding 3.6.23+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 abroswer N/A abrowser-branding N/A InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook-Remix 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.4) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid ubuntu-une -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872714 Title: After playing several clips in Flash 11, Firefox wouldn't quit cleanly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/872714/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 846271] Re: Cannot reliably send to Twitter when only Twitter account enabled
I am running Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846271 Title: Cannot reliably send to Twitter when only Twitter account enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/846271/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 846271] [NEW] Cannot reliably send to Twitter when only Twitter account enabled
Public bug reported: I am trying to send to Twitter, when yesterday Gwibber suddenly broke. Was suddenly unable to send to hashtags and @-accounts. I am also unable to send to Twitter if ONLY Twitter is enabled, but only when I can send to Facebook as well - obviously I don't want to clutter Facebook with tweets a lot of the time. I removed and readded the Gwibber system to my computer via Ubuntu Software Centre, but this didn't resolve the issue. Or not without sending several test messages and toggling Facebook sending. Something is weird... Please fix ASAP. ** Affects: gwibber (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846271 Title: Cannot reliably send to Twitter when only Twitter account enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/846271/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 812043] Re: gwibber uses a high amount of cpu 98%+ when refreshing
Any chance the fix could be SRU'd to Lucid if Lucid is still in life when fixed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812043 Title: gwibber uses a high amount of cpu 98%+ when refreshing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gwibber/+bug/812043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 811508] Re: Upon updating kernel, lost ethernet networking.
Ran lspci - 00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP79 Host Bridge (rev b1) 00:00.1 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation MCP79 Memory Controller (rev b1) 00:03.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP79 LPC Bridge (rev b3) 00:03.1 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation MCP79 Memory Controller (rev b1) 00:03.2 SMBus: nVidia Corporation MCP79 SMBus (rev b1) 00:03.3 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation MCP79 Memory Controller (rev b1) 00:03.5 Co-processor: nVidia Corporation MCP79 Co-processor (rev b1) 00:04.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation MCP79 OHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev b1) 00:04.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation MCP79 EHCI USB 2.0 Controller (rev b1) 00:06.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation MCP79 OHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev b1) 00:06.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation MCP79 EHCI USB 2.0 Controller (rev b1) 00:08.0 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP79 High Definition Audio (rev b1) 00:09.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP79 PCI Bridge (rev b1) 00:0b.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP79 SATA Controller (rev b1) 00:0c.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP79 PCI Express Bridge (rev b1) 00:0d.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP79 PCI Express Bridge (rev b1) 00:0e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP79 PCI Express Bridge (rev b1) 00:10.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP79 PCI Express Bridge (rev b1) 00:15.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP79 PCI Express Bridge (rev b1) 00:16.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP79 PCI Express Bridge (rev b1) 00:17.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP79 PCI Express Bridge (rev b1) 00:18.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP79 PCI Express Bridge (rev b1) 05:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation ION VGA [GeForce 9400M] (rev b1) 06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetLink BCM5906M Fast Ethernet PCI Express (rev 02) 07:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811508 Title: Upon updating kernel, lost ethernet networking. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/811508/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 811508] Re: Upon updating kernel, lost ethernet networking.
Also affects me - I am running a Lenovo Ideapad S12... appeared to hang for a long time on the splashscreen after accepting updates. Rebooted using Alt-SYSRQ-REISUB... tried again. No networking. Wouldn't even scan. Rebooted with 2.6.32.32 - came straight up. I don't know how to list my wifi and Ethernet cards... all I know is they come as standard on the Ideapad S12 as bought in 2010. Please fix ASAP. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811508 Title: Upon updating kernel, lost ethernet networking. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/811508/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 806077] Re: When using 2 news servers, "N" key to read next article doesn't work
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/806077 Title: When using 2 news servers, "N" key to read next article doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pan/+bug/806077/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 806077] [NEW] When using 2 news servers, "N" key to read next article doesn't work
Public bug reported: I am reading Usenet groups from my ISP (eclipse.co.uk) and Mozilla groups from their own servers (news.mozilla.com). If I want to read articles from one of the Eclipse-hosted groups, I have to doubleclick on each one, rather than being able to just follow threads using "n" key. RUnning Pan 0.133 on Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS. Usability issue - and no docs to speak of. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: pan 0.133-1.1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-32.62-generic 2.6.32.38+drm33.16 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-32-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Jul 5 18:16:53 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook-Remix 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.4) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: pan ** Affects: pan (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid ubuntu-une -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/806077 Title: When using 2 news servers, "N" key to read next article doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pan/+bug/806077/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 693131] Re: Launchpad links in the bug-fix description field don't lauch Firefox when set as default
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 18:38 +, RedSingularity wrote: > You are correct. It should. The bug is in a script that changes the x > -www-browser file. I am marking the bug as confirmed and will edit the > description for the developers. In the meantime in order to get a > choice of a preferred web browser, uninstall epiphany since you do not > use it anyway. > > sudo apt-get autoremove epiphany-browser > > Then try the following command in terminal again: > > x-www-browser > > This time firefox should open without a problem. Is it safe to remove gnome-dbg? As that one was marked as one that would be deleted... -- Alex Cockell Reading, Berks, UK a...@acockell.eclipse.co.uk -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693131 Title: Launchpad links in the bug-fix description field don't lauch Firefox when set as default -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 693131] Re: Launchpad links in the bug-fix description field don't lauch Firefox when set as default
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 22:27 +, RedSingularity wrote: > Update-manager is using the code x-www-browser to open the "default" > browser. Unfortunately, the preference settings GUI is not really > changing the "default" browser in x-www-browser. As long as epiphany is > installed it has preference over other browsers when executing the > command x-www-browser. When using other programs that do not initiate x > -www-browser, preferred browser will launch. > Try this in a terminal to confirm: > > x-www-browser > > Did it open firefox or epiphany? > Opened GNOME Web Browser - I take that is Epiphany? Surely it should start Firefox if that's the Preferred app? -- Alex Cockell Reading, Berks, UK a...@acockell.eclipse.co.uk -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693131 Title: Launchpad links in the bug-fix description field don't lauch Firefox when set as default -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 693131] Re: Launchpad links in the bug-fix description field don't lauch Firefox when set as default
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 17:49 +, RedSingularity wrote: > Set a custom command of: > > firefox %s > > and see if that works for a while. > > Also, do you use the gnome-browser at all? > I haven't used the GNOME browser at all... and "firefox %s" is the command issued anyway when i select Firefox... -- Alex Cockell Reading, Berks, UK a...@acockell.eclipse.co.uk -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693131 Title: Launchpad links in the bug-fix description field don't lauch Firefox when set as default -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 693131] Re: Launchpad links in the bug-fix description field don't lauch Firefox when set as default
- Original message - > Tried it again in 10.04 and 10.10 install with no problems. Under > "system>preferences>preferred applications" what command is the system > using to launch firefox? Just Firefox selected from the list box. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693131 > > Title: > Launchpad links in the bug-fix description field don't lauch Firefox > when set as default > > Status in “update-manager” package in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: update-manager > > I fired up Update Manager to check what fixes were waiting - decided > to have a look at the related Launchpad report against one of the > kernel updates... instead of opening up a tab in Firefox as I > expected, it started another program called the "Gnome Web Browser". > In turn, this messed up my audio playback - I had to reboot to get my > audio back. This affected ALL audio playback whether from my browser > or from other audio apps (Totem, Rhythmbox etc). > > I tested with iPlayer - and while I could watch images, there was no > audio at all until I rebooted. > > I have Firefox set as my default browser in System Preferences - > surely this option should be used by all apps requesting web-page > output? > > What was concerning was - I had Firefox open at the time - > > Expected behaviour... that the Launchpad page would open up in a new > tab within Firefox. > > Please fix. > > ProblemType: Bug > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 > Package: update-manager 1:0.134.11 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-26.48-generic 2.6.32.24+drm33.11 > Uname: Linux 2.6.32-26-generic i686 > Architecture: i386 > Date: Tue Dec 21 18:35:00 2010 > PackageArchitecture: all > ProcEnviron: > LANG=en_GB.utf8 > SHELL=/bin/bash > SourcePackage: update-manager > > To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/693131/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693131 Title: Launchpad links in the bug-fix description field don't lauch Firefox when set as default -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 693131] Re: Launchpad links in the bug-fix description field don't lauch Firefox when set as default
I tried again today - clicked on the link https://launchpad.net/bugs/699885 in Update Manager when looking at linux-headers-2-6-28-32 changes... GNOME Web Browser opened up rather than Firefox - when I have Firefox set as my Preferred Browser. Surely Update Manager should look at my preferences. Please resolve. ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693131 Title: Launchpad links in the bug-fix description field don't lauch Firefox when set as default -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 693131] Re: Launchpad links in the bug-fix description field don't lauch Firefox when set as default
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 02:16 +, RedSingularity wrote: > This seems to be a nautilus problem since it has to do with opening > default programs. Changing package. Once you rebooted was this issue > repeatable or is it working as expected now? > > ** Package changed: update-manager (Ubuntu) => nautilus (Ubuntu) As there are no security updates coming in, I'm unable to retest. -- Alex Cockell Reading, Berks, UK a...@acockell.eclipse.co.uk -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693131 Title: Launchpad links in the bug-fix description field don't lauch Firefox when set as default -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 695644] Re: Unable to watch SeeSaw.com content full-screen
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695644 Title: Unable to watch SeeSaw.com content full-screen -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 695644] [NEW] Unable to watch SeeSaw.com content full-screen
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree I attempted to watch a Dr Who episode on SeeSaw.com - display was screwed up when I selected full screen, to the extent that the "Press Esc to exit full-screen" message scrolled left to right on a black screen; I was able to hear sound though. I was then unable to back out by hitting Escape (normal return-to-windowed-display keypress). Seesaw's own help describes this as a known issue; it recommends disabling hardware acceleration by right-clicking on the player, selecting "Settings" then deselcting "use hardware acceleration". This is greyed out on 10.04.1 running on an R61i (my display controller is, I believe, an Intel X3100). Consequently, this course of action is not available to me, and I am restricted to watching within a window. In order to recover, I had to hit CTRL-ALT-F1, switch to a text console, log in and reboot (sudo shutdown-r now)... then watch the content in a window. I have not tested with iPlayer - but this could also have an impact. Please liaise with Adobe and fix. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: flashplugin-installer 10.1.102.65ubuntu0.10.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-27.49-generic 2.6.32.26+drm33.12 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-27-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Dec 30 10:25:09 2010 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: flashplugin-nonfree ** Affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695644 Title: Unable to watch SeeSaw.com content full-screen -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 693131] Re: Launchpad links in the bug-fix description field don't lauch Firefox when set as default
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693131 Title: Launchpad links in the bug-fix description field don't lauch Firefox when set as default -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 693131] [NEW] Launchpad links in the bug-fix description field don't lauch Firefox when set as default
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager I fired up Update Manager to check what fixes were waiting - decided to have a look at the related Launchpad report against one of the kernel updates... instead of opening up a tab in Firefox as I expected, it started another program called the "Gnome Web Browser". In turn, this messed up my audio playback - I had to reboot to get my audio back. This affected ALL audio playback whether from my browser or from other audio apps (Totem, Rhythmbox etc). I tested with iPlayer - and while I could watch images, there was no audio at all until I rebooted. I have Firefox set as my default browser in System Preferences - surely this option should be used by all apps requesting web-page output? What was concerning was - I had Firefox open at the time - Expected behaviour... that the Launchpad page would open up in a new tab within Firefox. Please fix. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: update-manager 1:0.134.11 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-26.48-generic 2.6.32.24+drm33.11 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-26-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Dec 21 18:35:00 2010 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: update-manager ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693131 Title: Launchpad links in the bug-fix description field don't lauch Firefox when set as default -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 688900] Re: Cannot apply bug updates - one package non-existent
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/688900 Title: Cannot apply bug updates - one package non-existent -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 688900] [NEW] Cannot apply bug updates - one package non-existent
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager I am using a preinstalled Thinkpad R61i, running Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS. I tried accepting systems updates today, when the following happened. I clicked on Check - only on the 3rd attempt did it manage to pull all 48 lookup files down. I clicked on Install - only 35 of the 36 available updates downloaded... I aborted and stopped the update process there.. in case anything was broken by a partial update. Here are the errors... W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xulrunner-1.9.2/xulrunner-1.9_1.9.2.13+build3+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1_all.deb W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/x/xulrunner-1.9.2/xulrunner-1.9.2_1.9.2.13+build3+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1_i386.deb Please resolve ASAP. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: update-manager 1:0.134.11 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-26.48-generic 2.6.32.24+drm33.11 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-26-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Dec 11 09:40:09 2010 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: update-manager ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/688900 Title: Cannot apply bug updates - one package non-existent -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 462182] Re: [needs-packaging] Please upgrade to openmotif 2.3.xx
Looks like it's just made Debian Testing. http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openmotif/news/20100926T163917Z.html Any chance it could be evaluated for SRU into Lucid? Maybe along with talking to Citrix about getting their ICA client into the repos... or an installer stub into Universe/Multiverse as a stopgap? So we end-users have a one-step action? -- [needs-packaging] Please upgrade to openmotif 2.3.xx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462182 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 344440] Re: Latest Citrix client will not run
Upstream activity - http://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/openmotif - Openmotif 2.3.3-4 is in Debian Unstable - maybe something to keep our eyes on? -- Latest Citrix client will not run https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 462182] Re: [needs-packaging] Please upgrade to openmotif 2.3.xx
For info - looks like Debian upstream have just accepted Openmotif 2.3.3-4 into Unstable. http://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/openmotif Maybe a bug watch could be applied? -- [needs-packaging] Please upgrade to openmotif 2.3.xx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462182 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 462182] Re: [needs-packaging] Please upgrade to openmotif 2.3.xx
Citrix's own support docs... http://hqextsrvsft01.citrix.com/article/CTX125285 Would it be possible to get Canonical and Citrix to talk? -- [needs-packaging] Please upgrade to openmotif 2.3.xx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462182 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557651] Re: Sync get-iplayer 2.76-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
would it be possible to reactivate this request? also to eventually sru the applet into Lucid? -- Sync get-iplayer 2.76-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557651 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 576724] Re: Ubuntu Lucid grub2 dist-upgrades result in confusion
It sounds like my best option is to wait until after the new 10.04.1 CDs and USB keys are available, then buy them from said vendor; do my upgrades from supplied media... What advice is usually given to non-technical users when it comes to major updates like this? Or should I do something like - buy the OS upgrades then take my kit to my local LUG and let them do it? Or should I just write off my Thinkpad next year and buy a new computer? -- Alex Cockell a...@acockell.eclipse.co.uk -- Ubuntu Lucid grub2 dist-upgrades result in confusion https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 576724] Re: Ubuntu Lucid grub2 dist-upgrades result in confusion
I don;'t intend to replace the OS on my R61i until the Ubuntu 10.04 service pack comes out mid-August... -- Ubuntu Lucid grub2 dist-upgrades result in confusion https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 576724] Re: Ubuntu Lucid grub2 dist-upgrades result in confusion
@Erick, As yet, I don't know. I Am currently using a Thinkpad R61i as supplied by Linux Emporium with 8.04, and an Ideapad S12 - as supplied with 9.10 and 10.04dev (10.04dev on a separate partition, which I accepted updates to - although I am generally using the 9.10 instance). All I've done so far is simply accept updates via Update Manager. Any software I've added - was simply by firing up Synaptic or Software Centre and clicking on the relevant buttons to request it. I am worried that selecting the wrong option - especially on my netbook - will leave me with an unbootable machine - the only option being to send it back to the vendor to fix it. -- Ubuntu Lucid grub2 dist-upgrades result in confusion https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 576724] Re: Ubuntu Lucid grub2 dist-upgrades result in confusion
I have to ask - what about people who bought their computer preinstalled with Ubuntu? Like me, for instance? How on earth am I supposed to know what options to accept? -- Ubuntu Lucid grub2 dist-upgrades result in confusion https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599144] Re: Xchat-gnome locks up when I search for channels
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51003901/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51003902/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51003903/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51003904/XsessionErrors.txt -- Xchat-gnome locks up when I search for channels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599144] [NEW] Xchat-gnome locks up when I search for channels
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xchat-gnome XChat-GNOME 0.26.1 I am attempting to find a channel to do with Glastonbury, I select Network/Channels, the client displays a massive list.. then freezes, and the app greys out. I am unable therefore to search for and join the channel. i am attempting this on the Freenode network. Please fix. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Jun 27 22:29:40 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/xchat-gnome InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook-Remix 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.4) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia wl Package: xchat-gnome 1:0.26.1-1ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-22.60-generic SourcePackage: xchat-gnome Tags: ubuntu-unr Uname: Linux 2.6.31-22-generic i686 ** Affects: xchat-gnome (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 ubuntu-unr -- Xchat-gnome locks up when I search for channels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 590960] Re: gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV
Hello i do not know what a "backtrace" is, and do not want to risk breaking my computer, as fixing it would entail sending it back to the vendor. I bought my computer preinstalled. - Original message - > ** Visibility changed to: Public > > -- > gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590960 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in “gnome-power-manager” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager > > I don;'t know. I am running a preinstalled instance of Lucid dev (which > I have just updated) on a Lenovo Ideapad S12 bought from Linux Emporium. > > All I know is the system has told be there was a crash report, so I have > sent it in. > > ProblemType: Crash > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 > Package: gnome-power-manager 2.30.0-0ubuntu1 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-18.27-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 > Uname: Linux 2.6.32-18-generic i686 > NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia > Architecture: i386 > Date: Mon Jun 7 19:57:31 2010 > ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-power-manager > GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: Unknown > GnomeSessionInhibitors: Failed to acquire > GnomeSessionSuspendInhibited: Unknown > InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 > (20100324) MachineType: LENOVO 20021,2959 > ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-18-generic > root=UUID=d7e46043-0a27-4f35-8d55-0c5ca67af778 ro quiet splash > ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/gnome-power-manager ProcEnviron: > SHELL=/bin/bash > PATH=(custom, no user) > LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 > SegvAnalysis: > Segfault happened at: 0xf7400b: inc %edi > PC (0x00f7400b) ok > source "%edi" ok > SP (0xbfc33dd0) ok > Reason could not be automatically determined. > Signal: 11 > SourcePackage: gnome-power-manager > StacktraceTop: > ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > Title: gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV > UserGroups: dialout dip uucp > dmi.bios.date: 10/16/2009 > dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO > dmi.bios.version: 21CN25WW > dmi.board.name: MoutCook > dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO > dmi.board.version: Not Applicable > dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag > dmi.chassis.type: 10 > dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO > dmi.chassis.version: N/A > dmi.modalias: > dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr21CN25WW:bd10/16/2009:svnLENOVO:pn20021,2959:pvrLenovoIdeapadS12:rvnLENOVO:rnMoutCook:rvrNotApplicable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrN/A: > dmi.product.name: 20021,2959 dmi.product.version: Lenovo Ideapad S12 > dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO > > To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/590960/+subscribe -- gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590960 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584365] [NEW] [needs-packaging] EBU Octoshape
Public bug reported: Octoshape is a media playback plug-in used by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) for some of their shows fed around the Eurovisioon network. One such show is the Eurovision Song COntest. Adding this plugin will enable playout of their streams. I believe it is possible that is it proprietary - if so, please could Canonical discuss with them the possibility of getting it into the Partner repository,. COuld they also consider rolling it out to Hardy, Karmic as well as Lucid. URL : http://www.octoshape.com/?page=get_octo/get_octo Select Linux version - released as a .bin, dependencies are on the site. Licence : Unsure.Looks commercial. Also peer-to-peer. (Granted - I'll be using live broadcast via the Beeb...) ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [needs-packaging] EBU Octoshape https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584365 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583986] Re: Firefox crashed when viewing yuvutu.com
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/4191/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/4192/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/4193/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: "profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/4194/profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/4195/profiles.ini.txt -- Firefox crashed when viewing yuvutu.com https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583986 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583986] [NEW] Firefox crashed when viewing yuvutu.com
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.5 I have no idea what is going on. Yuvutu.com breaks my browser. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri May 21 21:07:58 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook-Remix 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.4) NonfreeKernelModules: wl nvidia Package: firefox-3.5 3.5.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.10.1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-21.59-generic SourcePackage: firefox-3.5 Tags: ubuntu-unr Uname: Linux 2.6.31-21-generic i686 ** Affects: firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 ubuntu-unr -- Firefox crashed when viewing yuvutu.com https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583986 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583176] Re: On waking my computer from sleep when FIrefox has been running - I am unable to click on the dropdown at the end of the address bar. I have to quit and restart Firefox to select a sit
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48796852/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48796853/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48796854/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: "profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48796855/profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48796856/profiles.ini.txt -- On waking my computer from sleep when FIrefox has been running - I am unable to click on the dropdown at the end of the address bar. I have to quit and restart Firefox to select a site from the address bar history https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583176 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583176] [NEW] On waking my computer from sleep when FIrefox has been running - I am unable to click on the dropdown at the end of the address bar. I have to quit and restart Firefox to select a s
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.5 I am running a preinstalled instance of Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.10 on a Lenovo Ideapad S10 purchased from Linux Emporium. Situation - I leave the computer alone to do something else - Firefox is running. I come back, wake the computer from sleep by waggling the mouse or hitting a shift key... I attempt to open the address bar dropdown list./menu/whatever - expecting to see the populated list of frequently-accessed sites... this doesn't happen. Instead, the keyboard focus is locked ont he address bar.. even to the extent that autocomplete doesn't happen. What SHOULD happen is that the drop down should work. Firefox version is 3.5.9 - as supplied as standard with Ubuntu. Ubuntu version - UNR 9.10 with all updates prior to 17 May 2010 (I prefer to wait a week after packages arrive in Update Manager before acceptance.. just in case any of them break my computer). Please fix asap. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Thu May 20 07:13:31 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook-Remix 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.4) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia wl Package: firefox-3.5 3.5.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.10.1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-21.59-generic SourcePackage: firefox-3.5 Tags: ubuntu-unr Uname: Linux 2.6.31-21-generic i686 ** Affects: firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 ubuntu-unr -- On waking my computer from sleep when FIrefox has been running - I am unable to click on the dropdown at the end of the address bar. I have to quit and restart Firefox to select a site from the address bar history https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583176 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 524851] Re: [needs-packaging] Enhancement Request - Citrix Receiver as Ubuntu Partner package
I noticed a development on the Citrix website... It appears that Citrix clients are now available as a .deb off their website... http://www.citrix.com/English/ss/downloads/details.asp?downloadId=3323&productId=186&c1=sot2755&c2=ost1349860 Documentation is available here... http://support.citrix.com/proddocs/index.jsp?topic=/receiver-linux-blackfoot/linux-readme-11-100.html Would it be possible for this bug to be escalated with Canonical, and they get around a table with Citrix - get it into the Partner repo.. in time for 10.04.1 respin and also backport for Karmic and Hardy? Obviously check dependencies... -- [needs-packaging] Enhancement Request - Citrix Receiver as Ubuntu Partner package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524851 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85969] Re: Java Docs Package Won't Install
I have to ask - wouldn't it be possible for Canonical to liaise with Oracle re the possibility of getting the Java documentation into the Partner repo? Or has this already been done? -- Java Docs Package Won't Install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85969 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 565810] Re: packages.medibuntu.org not available
COuldn't a new CNAME DNSentry be submitted to get this up and running? I count myself as very much a basic user - so I'm currently not able to collect security updates. Please could whoever fix the DNS issue... -- packages.medibuntu.org not available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565810 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528728] Re: Totem BBC plugin cannot connect
Still not connecting... -- Totem BBC plugin cannot connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528728 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 524851] [NEW] [needs-packaging] Enhancement Request - Citrix Receiver as Ubuntu Partner package
Public bug reported: I think this has been raised before, both in Brainstorm and on the back of old bugs... and as community documentation. However, it has also been raised in Citrix's own discussion areas... Namely, getting Citrix Receiver available for Ubuntu from the repositories. Would it be possible for more experienced personnel to look into the possibility of Canonical liaising with Citrix so that the Receiver client could be made available as a fully-supported app in the Partner repository? That way, bugfixes could be easily and quickly supplied in the future... and all the dependencies can be handled quickly and easily? And most of all - safely? IT would help with possible business deployments of Ubuntu. But more prosaically - apparently Citrix have been having issues with building Debian packages - but they supply tarballs and RPMs. Maybe Canonical can help them in this regard? Speaking from a personal front, I use Citrix Receiver when I work from home - and keeping up to date with bugfixes would be a lot easier if I could just let Update Manager handle that for me. Current Citrix install process - https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CitrixICAClientHowTo Ubuntuforums thread (I do not have access from work) Current bug - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/295083 This was declined for Jaunty - could we get it in for Lucid? Would help with business adoption... Citrix discussion about *them* wanting it an "sudo apt-get install" away - http://community.citrix.com/display/ocb/2008/05/30/List+ICA+client+in+Ubuntu+Application+Repository Citrix knowledgebase article for debian - http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX118108, Could this be looked into, please? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging ** Tags added: needs-packaging -- [needs-packaging] Enhancement Request - Citrix Receiver as Ubuntu Partner package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524851 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 515678] Re: [needs-packaging] sun-java6 for lucid
PLEASE could the Release Management team ensure this goes in before Lucid goes to Gold release? I use my machine to remotely connect to work (Citrix/VPN) as well as other Sun Java apps out there... Currently on Hardy - but I plan to buy a new netbook with Lucid preinstalled... then upgrade this R61i from the preinstall it currently has (I buy from Linux Emporium). And I'd be scared of breaking the machine - far less risk if it's in the repos.. (also better for downstream people - like Dell and Mint). Might it be an idea to enter into discussions with Oracle to get full Sun Java into the Partner repos going forward? You know - like we do with Adobe? Just an idea from an end-user... -- [needs-packaging] sun-java6 for lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515678 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 362272] Re: [needs packaging] Adobe AIR
>From what I gather, Adobe have their own installer around this one - >apparently drops in either a .deb or an rpm depending on the distro detected. IMHO a bit cackhanded. Would it be possible for the Partner repo team to negotiate with Adobe for a plain .deb? That way, it could be released through the Partner repos just like Flash is now. Thoughts? -- [needs packaging] Adobe AIR https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362272 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295083] Re: [needs-packaging] ICA, an easy Way to get access to Citrix
>From what I gather, Citrix Inc would have to approach Canonical... but they could roll it in a similar manner to Adobe Acrobat (latest Acrobat reader is in the Partner repo). I think I added some comment to an Ubuntuforums thread... but can't find it.. Maybe something for Canonical to take up? Would save newbies having to work with tarballs... -- [needs-packaging] ICA, an easy Way to get access to Citrix https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 474860] [NEW] Tesco.com website crashes Firefox on logout
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 I was placing an order (managed to complete it), but when I clicked on the "Sign out and remember me" button, firefox crashed out. Suspect it is to do with interaction with Adblocker and Noscript fucntionality... even though Tesco should allow for this. Please assist. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Nov 4 22:53:56 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.15+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.24-25-generic i686 ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- Tesco.com website crashes Firefox on logout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474860 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 474860] Re: Tesco.com website crashes Firefox on logout
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35120401/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35120402/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35120403/profiles.ini.txt -- Tesco.com website crashes Firefox on logout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474860 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 447449] Re: I cannot connect to Yahoo Chat - my userid there is alcockell
Please link to bug 398322... same incident. -- I cannot connect to Yahoo Chat - my userid there is alcockell https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389322] Re: Yahoo server authentication changed: Pidgin =<2.5.6 will not connect to Yahoo! servers.
I say again - is this bug where I am unable to log into Yahoo Messenger services with the version of Pidgin on Hardy as supplied by Canonical repositories going to be fixed? I would not feel comfortable stepping away from Canonical's repos... as I do not know enough to resolve issues otherwise. Please fix it ASAP. -- Yahoo server authentication changed: Pidgin =<2.5.6 will not connect to Yahoo! servers. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389322] Re: Yahoo server authentication changed: Pidgin =<2.5.6 will not connect to Yahoo! servers.
@Release Management - if Pidgin is working OK in Karmic (2.6.2 supported against Yahoo), please could you consider not causing us basic users to have the choice between not using Yahoo or breaking our machines y stepping outside the official Canonical repos? In short, please could you consider SRUing 2.6.2 back to Hardy? Thanks, -- Yahoo server authentication changed: Pidgin =<2.5.6 will not connect to Yahoo! servers. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389322] Re: Yahoo server authentication changed: Pidgin =<2.5.6 will not connect to Yahoo! servers.
@ Release Management - re Shubes' comment.. please could Relman explain why it is that us Hardy users are going to be left behind.. again... -- Yahoo server authentication changed: Pidgin =<2.5.6 will not connect to Yahoo! servers. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389322] Re: Yahoo server authentication changed: Pidgin =<2.5.6 will not connect to Yahoo! servers.
I had a look on Yahoo's blogs - and found this article - http://www.ymessengerblog.com/blog/2009/09/18/versions-6-7-5-will-end- on-september-30/ It looks as though Pidgin has to emulate Yahoo 9 or later in order to be let in. -- Yahoo server authentication changed: Pidgin =<2.5.6 will not connect to Yahoo! servers. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389322] Re: Yahoo server authentication changed: Pidgin =<2.5.6 will not connect to Yahoo! servers.
Yahoo seems to have locked me out - again. I'm using Hardy with all updates... Any idea when this fix is going to reach us basic LTS users? -- Yahoo server authentication changed: Pidgin =<2.5.6 will not connect to Yahoo! servers. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 447449] [NEW] I cannot connect to Yahoo Chat - my userid there is alcockell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pidgin OS version - a...@ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS Release:8.04 a...@ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy pidgin pidgin: Installed: 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2.6 Candidate: 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2.6 Version table: *** 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2.6 0 500 http://security.ubuntu.com hardy-security/main Packages 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages I expected to log into Yahoo Messenger services cleanly - it worked yesterday. All my IRC connections have established on Pidgin launch, but Yahoo won't log on. Why? More importantly - will it be fixed in my current OS before long? I wouldn't feel safe potentially breaking my sole computer... ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Oct 9 19:00:33 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/pidgin Package: pidgin 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2.6 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: pidgin Uname: Linux 2.6.24-24-generic i686 ** Affects: pidgin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- I cannot connect to Yahoo Chat - my userid there is alcockell https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 447449] Re: I cannot connect to Yahoo Chat - my userid there is alcockell
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33370253/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33370254/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33370255/ProcStatus.txt -- I cannot connect to Yahoo Chat - my userid there is alcockell https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226878] Re: [MASTER] Firefox freezes often
I am on Hardy - 8.04.3LTS, with all updates as at 5 aug 2009, Firefox 3.0.12. Experiencing lockups in Firefox as above. Please could Mozilla hurry up and fix this incident... -- [MASTER] Firefox freezes often https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226878 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 343026] Re: Wifi driver will fail to load if regulatory domain set in module options
Umm- what about us preinstall users? I bought my Thinkpad R61i preinstalled from Linux Emporium - and would not feel comfortable if on a critical update, it broke. Which is what an end-user like me will think. PLEASE don't cause someone like me to have to send my primary machine across the country to my vendor to be fixed if you suddenly kill networking from under me... Or - at least present a menu or something on setup... -- Wifi driver will fail to load if regulatory domain set in module options https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343026 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389322] Re: Yahoo server authentication changed: Pidgin =<2.5.6 will not connect to Yahoo! servers.
Agreed... please could we basic users on preinstalled LTS have the fix as well? -- Yahoo server authentication changed: Pidgin =<2.5.6 will not connect to Yahoo! servers. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370173] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown
For the record, with the cooler running, my temps are down at a...@ubuntu:~$ acpi -t Thermal 1: ok, 42.0 degrees C Thermal 2: ok, 40.0 degrees C whereas I recall them being at the 52 deg C point... and the GPU running very hard. On mains, the BIOS is set to run at Performance level, GNOME has Ondemand/ondemand. Just that I'm worried that eventually when I accept an upgrade to the next LTS, it would cook my machine. And this is 650 quid of laptop... uname is Linux ubuntu 2.6.24-23-generic #1 SMP Wed Apr 1 21:47:28 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux. Last kernel accepted via Update Manager was -24.53 which had the issue. -- Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370173] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown
Apologies if I come across as strident. I am an end-user - I bought the laptop preinstalled. Therefore, to me, the OS is part of the product. -- Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370173] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown
All I know is that back last week, my machine was desperately hot to the touch, and froze up. I hard-powered off, called my vendor, left it most of a day to cool down... but am now running it on top of a cooler. SOMETHING happened after system updates (accepting 2.6.24-24.53 onto my machine) that I took on about two weeks back, which caused the laptop to be extremely hot to the touch, whacked the thermal warnings into my logs, AND DID NOT SHUT DOWN. In order to run my machine, I HAVE to run it on the cooler, and the fan does not go about about 3100rpm. It was unbearably hot, and it is only with the cooler running, blowing cold air at the base on the unit, that the CPU stays within functional temps. Since then - I run it on top of the cooler.. but if I ever did boot into -24.53 again, it would probably overheat. As stuff is often rolled in.. PLEASE JUST FIX IT. I am *not* a developer. Nor do I want to see my laptop break if I had to run it away from the cooler. -- Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370173] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown
For the record, I am your putative Regular User who bought his laptop preinstalled with Ubuntu 8.04. I have no other OS, and this is my primary machine (Thinkpad R61i, 7650-series model). All I know is that my machine overheated when running 2.6.24-24.53, and my vendor told me to go back to booting -23. And in order to keep the CPU temps around the mid-40s (which I believe is OK for Core 2 Duo THinkpads according to these long threads), I have to run it on a cooler. I gave it a blast with compressed air - but anything else would mean me taking the laptop to an IBM Service Centre. Currently, it's running OK atop the cooler- but I am sure it's the cooler keeping the temperature down. Something happened with the system updates around my first post on this incident report. Please, could Canonical fix the issue, and get a fix into my Update Manager once it's fully tested. -- Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370173] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown
Lenovo Thinkpad R61i - I was running 2.6.24-24.53 when suffering thermal emergencies - but with no shutdowns although the laptop was asking for them. Intel X3100 embedded graphics Intel 3945ABG wireless, Broadcom ethernet controller Core 2 Duo, 2x 1.8GHz. I daren't run this not on the Axasa laptop cooler. RUnning 8.04.2 (or most of it), but running 2.6.24-23generic.. Canonical - you have a Severity 2 incident here - just fix it already! -- Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370173] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown
Please backport fixes to Hardy as well when resolved. -- Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370173] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown
Could this be a lead? http://forums.lenovo.com/lnv/board/message?board.id=R_Series_Thinkpads&thread.id=3409 Possible heat issue with the graphics processor even with Vista... I found the above on the Lenovo forums yesterday; maybe it's the GPU that's heating stuff up.. but the main thermal sensors listened to are on the CPUs? Is the GPU kinda central on the motherboard? Just that I do remember my laptop's underside getting warm especially when running on mains with the battery out ever since I bought the laptop (I used to cook batteries in an old Toshiba - so I often do that if I'm running mostly on mains at home). Laptop fan kicks up to around 3000 periodically - but mostly being handled by the cooler at the mo. Could it be that the GPU needs the fan to run longer and faster to cool it down? Just that I did notice once when it WAS hot that the mouse would respond to movement but not to clicks. Could the GPU be thrashing? There were also these lines from /var/log/messages... May 30 23:10:05 ubuntu kernel: [531782.411921] thinkpad_acpi: unhandled HKEY event 0x6022 But with no shutdown action as these events weren't being handed off in Hardy... But - since I bought the cooler - no heat issues at all. However, I DID notice CPU0 go to 100% when the GPU wakes up (I hit shift to wake the display up after leaving the machine for a bit)... in 2.6.24-24 (kernel that gave me grief), I did also notice a bit of a memory leak. In -23 (my uname - Linux ubuntu 2.6.24-23-generic #1 SMP Wed Apr 1 21:47:28 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux), it isn't immediately hitting swap, and running at about 100Mb less memory used with Evolution, Firefox (6 tabs), Sysmon, gedit. Unlike under -24, where there was a definitely memory leak (committed memory climbing towards 50% rather than 30 - I run 2Gb onboard). Could the bugs be in -24-restricted? -- Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 213818] Re: thinkpad CPU overheat ubuntu hardy 8.04
Could this be a lead? http://forums.lenovo.com/lnv/board/message?board.id=R_Series_Thinkpads&thread.id=3409 Possible heat issue with the graphics processor even with Vista... -- thinkpad CPU overheat ubuntu hardy 8.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 213818] Re: thinkpad CPU overheat ubuntu hardy 8.04
Here are my trip-points - Thunkpad R61i running Hardy... a...@ubuntu:~$ cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM0/trip_points critical (S5): 127 C a...@ubuntu:~$ cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM1/trip_points critical (S5): 100 C passive: 96 C: tc1=5 tc2=4 tsp=600 devices=CPU0 CPU1 a...@ubuntu:~$ cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM1/* state: ok temperature: 41 C critical (S5): 100 C passive: 96 C: tc1=5 tc2=4 tsp=600 devices=CPU0 CPU1 a...@ubuntu:~$ cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM0/* state: ok temperature: 44 C critical (S5): 127 C Linux ubuntu 2.6.24-23-generic #1 SMP Wed Apr 1 21:47:28 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux (I booted to this kernel on advice of Linux Emporium) I'm running the laptop on an Akasa cooler so I can carry on using it comfortably - gave it a blast with compressed air - this did help get the CPU temps down to 40-odd degrees C... But those trip points somehow see wrong - and why is the temp not being polled? -- thinkpad CPU overheat ubuntu hardy 8.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
