booting problem
I recently tried to install Centos 8 on my 3tb uefi hd that already had Fedora 32 and Windows 10 on it. The Centos installation did not finish because it could install the boot loader. It ended up screwing up the uefi boot because it will no longer boot to anything. It looks like the bios reset to non uefi boot only. My mb is Gigabyte B450 Auros with 64gb mem. ' Doug Lindquist oug.lindqu...@atlanticbb.net ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Multiboot question
On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 00:11 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Please remember to quote context when replying on HyperKitty, > otherwise your message cannot be understood without firing up a web > browser. Or a threading email client... While I prefer proper quoting, I'd rather have none than the unedited full-quoting gumph that some people do. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1127.8.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue May 12 16:57:42 UTC 2020 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Multiboot question
On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 23:03 +, Steven Usdansky via users wrote: > Not the answer I was hoping for, but it's a question I've wanted to ask for a > while. Thanks for confirming my worst fears 🤠 Please remember to quote context when replying on HyperKitty, otherwise your message cannot be understood without firing up a web browser. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Multiboot question
Not the answer I was hoping for, but it's a question I've wanted to ask for a while. Thanks for confirming my worst fears 🤠 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mount options for mostly-offline drives
On 02Jun2020 10:57, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I have a powered USB dock with a couple of SATA drives configured as RAID1, and used only for nightly backups. The (minimal) manual for the dock tells me it will power down after 30 minutes idle time, however I don't see this happening. I presume that something (such as the md system) is touching the drives periodically. What is the fstab option to have the drives mounted only when accessed? This used to be automount (or autofs) but with systemd getting its fingers into everything I know longer know how to do this. Can the drive be automatically unmounted if not in use? I presume this would stop md from trying to check it and hence prevent the dock from keeping it powered on. My own solution, here and at a client, is to have the backup script do the mount and umount. This has the advantage that the backups aren't even available for mangling the rest of the time. A script like this: if mount /the/backup/volume then ... run the backup ... umount /the/backup/volume fi works nicely. The md stuff should, I expect, leave things alone except for the weekly(?) rescan. It also means that if you know the backup's over you can freely unplug them (eg put them on a shelf or in a drawer, or send one set off site). Cheers, Cameron Simpson ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mount options for mostly-offline drives
On 2020-06-02 23:38, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 10:17 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: >> you might want to >> >> run a lsof and see if anything has open files on it, and if nothing >> >> has open files on it, then it may something monitoring say space. > $ sudo lsof /raid > lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfsd-fuse file system /run/user/1000/gvfs > Output information may be incomplete. > lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.portal file system /run/user/1000/doc > Output information may be incomplete. > > Not sure why I'm getting gvfs errors. I do seem to be running some GVFS > stuff for some reason (my desktop is KDE though I do have some GTK > programs such as Firefox): > > $ pgrep -fl gvfs > 2364 gvfsd > 2372 gvfsd-fuse > 2656 gvfsd-metadata > 3509 gvfs-udisks2-vo > 3528 gvfs-goa-volume > 3548 gvfs-mtp-volume > 3561 gvfs-gphoto2-vo > 3574 gvfs-afc-volume > > Possibly the '...-volume' stuff is touching the disks, but there are no > man pages for most of these things. Those are "user units". Since you're running KDE you can bring up System Settings and scroll down to systemd and find the units in the user tab and stop them. Then see if that makes a difference. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mount options for mostly-offline drives
On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 11:51 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > I have not dug too far into those tools, but the machine I have a > > desktop running on does give me messages about low free disk space, so > > something in the gui side of things is doing the call that df uses to > > get data. df will spin things up, and if it samples often enough > > would prevent it from being idle. Just for the hell of it I logged out of KDE, verified that no GVFS processes were running, and repeated the test from a console. It made no difference. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mount options for mostly-offline drives
On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 10:45 -0600, Greg Woods wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 9:27 AM Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: > > > > > (the only change is in the last two fields, where you had 1 1 rather > > than my 0 0, but it made no difference, not that I thought it would). I > > also did the daemon-reload thing just in case. > > > > I have found that if you change an fstab entry, after doing "systemctl > daemon-reload", you also may need to restart the automount service to get > the changes to take, e.g. "systemctl restart raid.automount". Whether this > is necessary may well depend on exactly which parameters you specify in > your fstab entry, but I have certainly seen cases where this is necessary. That gives me: $ sudo systemctl restart raid.automount Job failed. See "journalctl -xe" for details. and journalctl is not enlightening: -- Subject: A start job for unit raid.automount has failed -- Defined-By: systemd -- Support: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel -- -- A start job for unit raid.automount has finished with a failure. -- -- The job identifier is 9170 and the job result is failed. No idea what this means. Saying "it failed" three times is no substitute for an actual error message. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: installation of F32 onto a ext. disk with 3 partitions
Hi Stan,I tried a "full" installation from an USB medium produced with Fedora Mediawriter. There are 250GB space to use on the wanted partition, where currently F31 is installed. I want to replace F31 by F32, there was no way to use custom installation. Automatic installation was preselected and could not change this. I used the same installation way I had used to install F29,F30,F31. Somethimg is wrong. If this behaviour is not wanted, it may be a bug, Did anyone else try to install F32 on a disk with more partitions?Kind regards -Ursprüngliche Mitteilung- Von: stan via users An: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: Joerg Lechner ; stan Verschickt: Di, 2. Jun. 2020 17:42 Betreff: Re: installation of F32 onto a ext. disk with 3 partitions On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 11:25:48 + (UTC) Joerg Lechner via users wrote: > Hi,I tried to install F32 on one partition of an external disk with 3 > partitions. I could not choose the partition I wanted, there was no > choice, which I have had in F31 and previously. Is the only way to > overwrite F31 in a 3 partitions disk an uograde F31 -> F32?Kind I haven't installed F32, but there was no mention of doing away with custom partitioning. Was this a live image or the full install using anaconda? If live, was the image too large for the partition you wanted to use? If anaconda, was there no way to select 'custom installation' in the menu when you reached the hub and spoke and selected the disk branch? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: build package
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 20:08:16 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Can I simulatenously install GSL 2.5 and 2.6? > > or remove GSL 2.6 and intall GSL 2.5? > The library SONAME has changed from libgsl.so.23 to libgsl.so.25, but libgslcblas.so.0 hasn't changed, and the Fedora packages would conflict anyway because they include executables and other files. Therefore you cannot simply install the old Fedora packages of gsl-2.4 and gsl-2.6 in parallel. Depending on your usage scenario, you could compile GSL 2.4 yourself and install it into a private path, then build other stuff (like Perl modules) against it and override $LD_LIBRARY_PATH whenever you want the runtime linker to find the old GSL libs. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Aplay problem -
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 14:06:41 -0400 Bob Goodwin wrote: > The essential ones are OO and up to the red, "L{NE" was muted I set > to MM and turned the level up, that does not restore the sound though. > I'm stumped. Everything says you should have sound from aplay. aplay is producing sound. It's sending it to default, which is sound device 0. Sound device 0 has output enabled, and volumes turned up. Other sound plays through default and pulseaudio. A long shot. Check in pavucontrol whether the default device in pulseaudio is set to be device 0, the analog card, and that it is enabled. If that is true, I'm out of ideas. Everything says you should have sound. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: build package
Can I simulatenously install GSL 2.5 and 2.6? or remove GSL 2.6 and intall GSL 2.5? === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 === Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2020 at 8:04 PM From: "Patrick Dupre" To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: "Community support for Fedora users" Subject: Re: build package Yes, This is annoying, I tried to see, if I could fix it, but I could not, there are differences between gsl2.5 and gsl2.6 This block the deployment of my applications. This a bit systematic, when I move to upgraded version, I always have to face similar issues. perl-Math-GSL is a key package for me. Actually, I also cannot compile perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2020 at 6:09 PM From: "George N. White III" To: "Community support for Fedora users" Subject: Re: build package On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 07:36, Patrick Duprewrote: Hello, I am rebuilding the perl packages that I need. perl-Math-GSL-0.40.tar.gz rpmbuild -bb perl-Math-GSL.spec gives an error: Checking for GSL using gsl-config Found GSL 2.6 (via gsl-config) installed in /usr Checking if gcc supports "-Wall"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-sometimes-uninitialized"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-function"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-value"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-function"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-variable"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-gnu"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-g"...yes unsupported version: 2.6 at Build.PL line 77. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.I4k1Cb (%build) https://github.com/leto/math--gsl/issues/176 is a request for GSL 2.6 support from last month. Checking on the Build.PL file; it seems to be due to my $ver2func = Ver2Func->new( $gsl_conf->{gsl_version} ); The same version of perl-Math-GSL compiled fine with fc30. (same version of cpanspec) Now the gsl version is 2.6 (2.4 before) Do I need to recompile gsl ? Until upstream finishes making the necessary changes you are stuck using an old gsl. You might consider helping (testing, documenting) with the changes. I use Fedora precisely so I can discover and work on issues like this for the software I use. -- George N. White III ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Aplay problem -
On 2020-06-02 12:51, stan via users wrote: ^ The vvv is important, because it provides more information, including an output profile over time, a rough vu meter. That is, it will show if aplay is actually sending output to the device. [bobg@Workstation-1 ~]$ aplay -vvv apps/audio/login.wav Playing WAVE 'apps/audio/login.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Stereo ALSA <-> PulseAudio PCM I/O Plugin Its setup is: stream : PLAYBACK access : RW_INTERLEAVED format : S16_LE subformat : STD channels : 2 rate : 22050 exact rate : 22050 (22050/1) msbits : 16 buffer_size : 11025 period_size : 2756 period_time : 125000 tstamp_mode : NONE tstamp_type : GETTIMEOFDAY period_step : 1 avail_min : 2756 period_event : 0 start_threshold : 11025 stop_threshold : 11025 silence_threshold: 0 silence_size : 0 boundary : 6206523236469964800 Max peak (5512 samples): 0x2334 ## 27% Max peak (5512 samples): 0x1b62 # 21% Max peak (5512 samples): 0x2e56 36% Max peak (5512 samples): 0x24c0 ## 28% Max peak (5512 samples): 0x3016 37% Max peak (5512 samples): 0x2bb5 ### 34% Max peak (5512 samples): 0x27c9 ### 31% Max peak (5512 samples): 0x1ab4 # 20% Max peak (5512 samples): 0x1459 15% Max peak (5512 samples): 0x0ab9 ## 8% Max peak (5512 samples): 0x04ac # 3% Max peak (5512 samples): 0x03a1 # 2% Max peak (5512 samples): 0x019d # 1% Max peak (5512 samples): 0x00e1 # 0% Max peak (5512 samples): 0x00ab # 0% Max peak (5512 samples): 0x0054 # 0% Max peak (5512 samples): 0x001c # 0% Max peak (5512 samples): 0x0006 # 0% hat's itnteresting in that when I feed aplay a tone, only happens in this computer, the volume begins low and increasesover a second or two, very noticable but not a problem I was bothered by. aplay --dump-hw-params [wav file] [bobg@Workstation-1 ~]$ aplay --dump-hw-params apps/audio/login.wav Playing WAVE 'apps/audio/login.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Stereo HW Params of device "default": And the output is being processed through the default device, which is the link between alsa and pulseaudio. Yes I keep seeing that, looks like the connection between aplay and Polseaudio is open ... Can you check in pavucontrol that the default device is actually your device 0, the analog sound device? Or just do a cat /etc/alsa/alsactl.conf ° [bobg@Workstation-1 ~]$ cat /etc/alsa/alsactl.conf # # ALSA library configuration file for alsactl tool # (/usr/share/alsa tree is not necessary for alsactl) # ctl.hw { @args [ CARD ] @args.CARD { type string default "0" } type hw card $CARD Everything says sound should be playing. If you do alsamixer -c0 are Master and Front showing 00? Is the volume in the bar above 80%? The essential ones are OO and up to the red, "L{NE" was muted I set to MM and turned the level up, that does not restore the sound though. Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD FEDORA-32/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: build package
Yes, This is annoying, I tried to see, if I could fix it, but I could not, there are differences between gsl2.5 and gsl2.6 This block the deployment of my applications. This a bit systematic, when I move to upgraded version, I always have to face similar issues. perl-Math-GSL is a key package for me. Actually, I also cannot compile perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 === Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2020 at 6:09 PM From: "George N. White III" To: "Community support for Fedora users" Subject: Re: build package On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 07:36, Patrick Duprewrote: Hello, I am rebuilding the perl packages that I need. perl-Math-GSL-0.40.tar.gz rpmbuild -bb perl-Math-GSL.spec gives an error: Checking for GSL using gsl-config Found GSL 2.6 (via gsl-config) installed in /usr Checking if gcc supports "-Wall"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-sometimes-uninitialized"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-function"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-value"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-function"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-variable"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-gnu"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-g"...yes unsupported version: 2.6 at Build.PL line 77. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.I4k1Cb (%build) https://github.com/leto/math--gsl/issues/176 is a request for GSL 2.6 support from last month. Checking on the Build.PL file; it seems to be due to my $ver2func = Ver2Func->new( $gsl_conf->{gsl_version} ); The same version of perl-Math-GSL compiled fine with fc30. (same version of cpanspec) Now the gsl version is 2.6 (2.4 before) Do I need to recompile gsl ? Until upstream finishes making the necessary changes you are stuck using an old gsl. You might consider helping (testing, documenting) with the changes. I use Fedora precisely so I can discover and work on issues like this for the software I use. -- George N. White III ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: boot/grub
On 6/2/20 2:31 AM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 2/6/20 10:38 am, Samuel Sieb wrote: I don't know the all the specific details, but this entry describes how to load the grub bootloader to start Fedora: "HD(1,GPT,5a166b43-c099-429b-9587-4cc29389e1cf,0x800,0x12c000)" identifies the hard drive and EFI partition to use. "File(\EFI\fedora\shimx64.efi)" gives the path to the executable file on that partition to load and run. I understand this is the entry that is being booted from, but I don't understand why it is that entry rather than boot0003, which looks to be the vm disk partition, when I am running fedora within a vm. I don't understand how this relates to the segmented disk image that virtualbox is using for fedora, as it is not a physical partition as far as I am aware. Virtualbox may make it look like a partition but I'm not up on the internal workings of virtualbox. Boot0003* UEFI VBOX HARDDISK VB86498f1a-4c6a0da4 PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0xd,0x0)/Sata(0,65535,0)N.YMR,Y. That is the usual UEFI fallback entry to look for an EFI partition on the disk and try to load the default boot loader file which I believe is "/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI". On a Fedora install, it will create that file as well, but if you boot it you will see a message about fixing the boot entry because it assumes the Fedora entry didn't work. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Prevent locking screen
On Mon, 01 Jun 2020 06:29:47 +, Andre Robatino wrote: > In GNOME, Settings/Privacy/Screen Lock/Automatic Screen Lock -> Off. > (You can still lock it manually if needed.) I didn't find that in Mate, but I did find the power settings in the control panel, and changed that. Thanks, Tom! -- Beartooth Staffwright, Not Quite Clueless Power User Remember I know little (precious little!) of where up is. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Aplay problem -
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:29:38 -0400 Bob Goodwin wrote: > On 2020-06-02 11:54, stan via users wrote: > > Try > > aplay -vvv [wav file] > > > [bobg@Workstation-1 ~]$ aplay -v apps/audio/login.wav ^ The vvv is important, because it provides more information, including an output profile over time, a rough vu meter. That is, it will show if aplay is actually sending output to the device. > > aplay --dump-hw-params [wav file] > [bobg@Workstation-1 ~]$ aplay --dump-hw-params apps/audio/login.wav > Playing WAVE 'apps/audio/login.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little Endian, > Rate 22050 Hz, Stereo > HW Params of device "default": And the output is being processed through the default device, which is the link between alsa and pulseaudio. Can you check in pavucontrol that the default device is actually your device 0, the analog sound device? Or just do a cat /etc/alsa/alsactl.conf Everything says sound should be playing. If you do alsamixer -c0 are Master and Front showing 00? Is the volume in the bar above 80%? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mount options for mostly-offline drives
I have not dug too far into those tools, but the machine I have a desktop running on does give me messages about low free disk space, so something in the gui side of things is doing the call that df uses to get data. df will spin things up, and if it samples often enough would prevent it from being idle. And yes, as you said there don't appear to be man pages for any of them. I have strace'd a few of the processes but so far not found what is doing the checking. I may not be leaving the strace running for long enough to catch it. On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 10:39 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 10:17 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > > you might want to > > > > run a lsof and see if anything has open files on it, and if nothing > > > > has open files on it, then it may something monitoring say space. > > $ sudo lsof /raid > lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfsd-fuse file system /run/user/1000/gvfs > Output information may be incomplete. > lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.portal file system /run/user/1000/doc > Output information may be incomplete. > > Not sure why I'm getting gvfs errors. I do seem to be running some GVFS > stuff for some reason (my desktop is KDE though I do have some GTK > programs such as Firefox): > > $ pgrep -fl gvfs > 2364 gvfsd > 2372 gvfsd-fuse > 2656 gvfsd-metadata > 3509 gvfs-udisks2-vo > 3528 gvfs-goa-volume > 3548 gvfs-mtp-volume > 3561 gvfs-gphoto2-vo > 3574 gvfs-afc-volume > > Possibly the '...-volume' stuff is touching the disks, but there are no > man pages for most of these things. > > poc > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mount options for mostly-offline drives
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 9:27 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > (the only change is in the last two fields, where you had 1 1 rather > than my 0 0, but it made no difference, not that I thought it would). I > also did the daemon-reload thing just in case. > I have found that if you change an fstab entry, after doing "systemctl daemon-reload", you also may need to restart the automount service to get the changes to take, e.g. "systemctl restart raid.automount". Whether this is necessary may well depend on exactly which parameters you specify in your fstab entry, but I have certainly seen cases where this is necessary. --Greg ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Aplay problem -
On 2020-06-02 11:54, stan via users wrote: Try aplay -vvv [wav file] [bobg@Workstation-1 ~]$ aplay -v apps/audio/login.wav Playing WAVE 'apps/audio/login.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Stereo ALSA <-> PulseAudio PCM I/O Plugin Its setup is: stream : PLAYBACK access : RW_INTERLEAVED format : S16_LE subformat: STD channels : 2 rate : 22050 exact rate : 22050 (22050/1) msbits : 16 buffer_size : 11025 period_size : 2756 period_time : 125000 tstamp_mode : NONE tstamp_type : GETTIMEOFDAY period_step : 1 avail_min: 2756 period_event : 0 start_threshold : 11025 stop_threshold : 11025 silence_threshold: 0 silence_size : 0 boundary : 6206523236469964800 or aplay --dump-hw-params [wav file] [bobg@Workstation-1 ~]$ aplay --dump-hw-params apps/audio/login.wav Playing WAVE 'apps/audio/login.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Stereo HW Params of device "default": ACCESS: RW_INTERLEAVED FORMAT: U8 S16_LE S16_BE S24_LE S24_BE S32_LE S32_BE FLOAT_LE FLOAT_BE MU_LAW A_LAW S24_3LE S24_3BE SUBFORMAT: STD SAMPLE_BITS: [8 32] FRAME_BITS: [8 1024] CHANNELS: [1 32] RATE: [1 384000] PERIOD_TIME: (2 4294967295) PERIOD_SIZE: [1 1398102) PERIOD_BYTES: [128 1398102) PERIODS: [3 1024] BUFFER_TIME: (7 4294967295] BUFFER_SIZE: [3 4194304] BUFFER_BYTES: [384 4194304] TICK_TIME: ALL What does aplay -l show? [bobg@Workstation-1 ~]$ aplay -l List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 0: ALC887-VD Analog [ALC887-VD Analog] Subdevices: 0/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 3: HDMI 0 [HDMI 0] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 7: HDMI 1 [HDMI 1] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 8: HDMI 2 [HDMI 2] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 9: HDMI 3 [HDMI 3] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 10: HDMI 4 [HDMI 4] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 See man aplay for explanations. ___ -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD FEDORA-32/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: build package
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 07:36, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > I am rebuilding the perl packages that I need. > perl-Math-GSL-0.40.tar.gz > > > rpmbuild -bb perl-Math-GSL.spec > > gives an error: > Checking for GSL using gsl-config > Found GSL 2.6 (via gsl-config) installed in /usr > Checking if gcc supports "-Wall"...yes > Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-sometimes-uninitialized"...yes > Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-function"...yes > Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-value"...yes > Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-function"...yes > Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-variable"...yes > Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-gnu"...yes > Checking if gcc supports "-g"...yes > unsupported version: 2.6 at Build.PL line 77. > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.I4k1Cb (%build) > https://github.com/leto/math--gsl/issues/176 is a request for GSL 2.6 support from last month. > > Checking on the Build.PL file; > it seems to be due to > > my $ver2func = Ver2Func->new( $gsl_conf->{gsl_version} ); > > > The same version of perl-Math-GSL compiled fine with fc30. > (same version of cpanspec) > Now the gsl version is 2.6 (2.4 before) > > Do I need to recompile gsl ? > Until upstream finishes making the necessary changes you are stuck using an old gsl. You might consider helping (testing, documenting) with the changes. I use Fedora precisely so I can discover and work on issues like this for the software I use. -- George N. White III ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Aplay problem -
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:57:00 -0400 Bob Goodwin wrote: > On 2020-06-01 06:45, Bob Goodwin wrote: > Well, I still have this annoying problem but after my effort > yesterday it appears there was a few errors in my description. > > The Thunderbird notification does not use aplay, it just gets the > file and path: "file:///home/bobg/apps/audio/login.wav" > And when J aplay that same file PSvolume does not show the metering > bar, it is only showing in text that it is "Playing .wav" on the > "Playback" input and the same text on the "Output Devices" sound > while nothing is heard from the loudspeaker. > > So it seems that aplay has simply stopped producing output. Other > audio sources still work as expected e.g. Thunderbird and VLC both > produce sound. Aplay from a terminal does not. > > I tried "# dnf reinstall /usr/bin/aplay" and it installed > "alsa-utils" which presumably contains aplay, that made no > improvement. > > I am still open to suggestions, Bob Try aplay -vvv [wav file] or aplay --dump-hw-params [wav file] What does aplay -l show? See man aplay for explanations. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: installation of F32 onto a ext. disk with 3 partitions
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 11:25:48 + (UTC) Joerg Lechner via users wrote: > Hi,I tried to install F32 on one partition of an external disk with 3 > partitions. I could not choose the partition I wanted, there was no > choice, which I have had in F31 and previously. Is the only way to > overwrite F31 in a 3 partitions disk an uograde F31 -> F32?Kind I haven't installed F32, but there was no mention of doing away with custom partitioning. Was this a live image or the full install using anaconda? If live, was the image too large for the partition you wanted to use? If anaconda, was there no way to select 'custom installation' in the menu when you reached the hub and spoke and selected the disk branch? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mount options for mostly-offline drives
On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 10:17 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > you might want to > > run a lsof and see if anything has open files on it, and if nothing > > has open files on it, then it may something monitoring say space. $ sudo lsof /raid lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfsd-fuse file system /run/user/1000/gvfs Output information may be incomplete. lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.portal file system /run/user/1000/doc Output information may be incomplete. Not sure why I'm getting gvfs errors. I do seem to be running some GVFS stuff for some reason (my desktop is KDE though I do have some GTK programs such as Firefox): $ pgrep -fl gvfs 2364 gvfsd 2372 gvfsd-fuse 2656 gvfsd-metadata 3509 gvfs-udisks2-vo 3528 gvfs-goa-volume 3548 gvfs-mtp-volume 3561 gvfs-gphoto2-vo 3574 gvfs-afc-volume Possibly the '...-volume' stuff is touching the disks, but there are no man pages for most of these things. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Multiboot question
On Tue, 02 Jun 2020 11:15:37 - Steven Usdansky via users wrote: > I have two bootable disks, and SSD with F32 (and Win 10), and a HDD > with F31 and a few other distros. Each disk has its own EFI > partition. F32 mounts the SSD's EFI partition at /boot/efi; F31 > mounts the HDD's EFI partition at /boot/efi. Both Fedoras have the > appropriate entries in their respective /boot/loader/entries > directories, and in both cases, GRUB_ENABLE_BLSCFG is set to true. > > If I update the F31 kernel, then boot off the SSD, I am not offered > the option of booting F31 with the new kernel unless I regenerate the > SSD's boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg. What I want is for the SSD's > bootloader to automatically offer me the option of booting any kernel > configured in the F31's /boot/loader/entries, rather than offering me > only the options in its own /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg. > > Is this even possible? From my understanding, no, it is a restriction of efi. Your manual workaround is the only way to get what you want using grub2 as your bootloader. If you switch to systemd-boot, my understanding is that this would be possible, but requires significant changes to the boot process. I considered going to systemd-boot, but decided it was to much work for no real gain, so will stick with grub2. I also didn't like how it seems to put more on the vfat filesystem; I would rather use native linux filesystems as much as possible. When I install my second fedora uefi system, I will also give it its own /boot/efi partition, like you have. But, when I want to boot the other version, I will use the boot menu that the efi firmware provides to select the other /boot/efi I want to use, the one for that version. Another workaround that will work for me because I will only rarely boot into the older Fedora. I keep it around for troubleshooting the current version if something goes wrong. It is known to work, has all the software I want, and is familiar, so easier than booting a rescue version. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fw: gnome-system-monitor with IO?
> Not gui, but ... > > Name : atop > Version : 2.5.0 > Release : 2.fc32 The right URL is https://www.atoptool.nl/ The maintaner should update this. BR, Bob ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mount options for mostly-offline drives
On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 20:24 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-06-02 20:07, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 2020-06-02 19:29, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > Doesn't seem to do anything. I've tested with this line in /etc/fstab: > > > > > > UUID=6cb66da2-147a-4f3c-a513-36f6164ab581 /raid ext4 > > > rw,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.device-timeout=1,x-systemd.idle-timeout=60 > > > 0 0 > > > > > > followed by 'mount -a' (using a 60-second timeout for testing) but it's > > > not unmounting. I also ran 'journalctl -f' but it doesn't show > > > anything. > > It works fine for non USB connected file systems. > > > > [egreshko@f31k ~]$ grep raid /etc/fstab > > /dev/md0/raid ext4 > > rw,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.device-timeout=1,x-systemd.idle-timeout=60 > > 1 1 > > > > [egreshko@f31k ~]$ date ; df --exclude-type=tmpfs --exclude-type=devtmpfs ; > > ls /raid ; df --exclude-type=tmpfs --exclude-type=devtmpfs ; sleep 65 ; > > date ; df --exclude-type=tmpfs --exclude-type=devtmpfs > > > [...] > Oh, and journal should these (abbreviated output) > > Jun 02 20:05:08 f31k.greshko.com systemd[1]: raid.automount: Got automount > request for /raid, triggered by 1308 (ls) > Jun 02 20:05:08 f31k.greshko.com systemd[1]: Mounting /raid... > Jun 02 20:05:08 f31k.greshko.com systemd[1]: Mounted /raid. > Jun 02 20:06:09 f31k.greshko.com systemd[1]: Unmounting /raid... > Jun 02 20:06:09 f31k.greshko.com systemd[1014]: raid.mount: Succeeded. > Jun 02 20:06:09 f31k.greshko.com systemd[1066]: raid.mount: Succeeded. > Jun 02 20:06:09 f31k.greshko.com systemd[1]: raid.mount: Succeeded. > Jun 02 20:06:09 f31k.greshko.com systemd[1]: Unmounted /raid. No, still not working: $ grep raid /etc/fstab UUID=6cb66da2-147a-4f3c-a513-36f6164ab581 /raid ext4 rw,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.device-timeout=1,x-systemd.idle-timeout=60 1 1 $ findfs UUID=6cb66da2-147a-4f3c-a513-36f6164ab581 /dev/md127p1 (the only change is in the last two fields, where you had 1 1 rather than my 0 0, but it made no difference, not that I thought it would). I also did the daemon-reload thing just in case. This is a USB system, so maybe that's at the root of the problem. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mount options for mostly-offline drives
you should not need any mount options. I have a mounted md array and have went to great lengths to make sure nothing usually accesses it and the drives do spin down and stay spun down until something accesses it. Making sure nothing was accessing it was not the easiest. A "df" with no options will spin them up. I had to move several services that exist on that disk onto an SSD and use that spinning mdraid device more as a backup and/or archive. So md will let the disks spin down so long as md is not doing a check/repair or io to the device for some reason. you might want to run a lsof and see if anything has open files on it, and if nothing has open files on it, then it may something monitoring say space. My machine that lets the disk spin down does not normally have a graphical desktop running, and there monitoring parts in the graphical logins that would be querying disk usage on some schedule. On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:57 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I have a powered USB dock with a couple of SATA drives configured as > RAID1, and used only for nightly backups. The (minimal) manual for the > dock tells me it will power down after 30 minutes idle time, however I > don't see this happening. I presume that something (such as the md > system) is touching the drives periodically. > > What is the fstab option to have the drives mounted only when accessed? > This used to be automount (or autofs) but with systemd getting its > fingers into everything I know longer know how to do this. > > Can the drive be automatically unmounted if not in use? I presume this > would stop md from trying to check it and hence prevent the dock from > keeping it powered on. > > poc > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Aplay problem -
On 2020-06-01 06:45, Bob Goodwin wrote: On 2020-05-31 22:12, Samuel Sieb wrote: If you rebooted, then the runaway script is gone and won't be affecting anything. I'm confused how you say some things can run aplay and make audio, but you can't run it directly. _ ° Yes, confusing to me too, I try only to query when I reach the end of my limited skill set. It seems to me like a path through Pulseaudio is broken. I will go back and try again with all I have there, the pavolume GUI. Will report back if I find anything, day just begins here ... Thanks all for the suggestions, Bob ° Well, I still have this annoying problem but after my effort yesterday it appears there was a few errors in my description. The Thunderbird notification does not use aplay, it just gets the file and path: "file:///home/bobg/apps/audio/login.wav" And when J aplay that same file PSvolume does not show the metering bar, it is only showing in text that it is "Playing .wav" on the "Playback" input and the same text on the "Output Devices" sound while nothing is heard from the loudspeaker. So it seems that aplay has simply stopped producing output. Other audio sources still work as expected e.g. Thunderbird and VLC both produce sound. Aplay from a terminal does not. I tried "# dnf reinstall /usr/bin/aplay" and it installed "alsa-utils" which presumably contains aplay, that made no improvement. I am still open to suggestions, Bob -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD FEDORA-32/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: build package
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:36:03 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > I am rebuilding the perl packages that I need. > perl-Math-GSL-0.40.tar.gz > > > rpmbuild -bb perl-Math-GSL.spec > > gives an error: > Checking for GSL using gsl-config > Found GSL 2.6 (via gsl-config) installed in /usr > Checking if gcc supports "-Wall"...yes > Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-sometimes-uninitialized"...yes > Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-function"...yes > Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-value"...yes > Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-function"...yes > Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-variable"...yes > Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-gnu"...yes > Checking if gcc supports "-g"...yes > unsupported version: 2.6 at Build.PL line 77. > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.I4k1Cb (%build) > > Checking on the Build.PL file; > it seems to be due to > > my $ver2func = Ver2Func->new( $gsl_conf->{gsl_version} ); > > > The same version of perl-Math-GSL compiled fine with fc30. > (same version of cpanspec) > Now the gsl version is 2.6 (2.4 before) > > Do I need to recompile gsl ? No, that wouldn't change anything as long as GSL 2.5 is the maximum version that is supported by Ver2Func. You could check the release notes of GSL 2.6 to figure out how compatible it is. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mount options for mostly-offline drives
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 11:57:13AM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Thanks Ed. I managed to find the man pages under systemd-mount(1) but > it took a while. The man page for mount(1) should have a reference but > doesn't. They aren't really mount options, but something that the systemd-fstab-generator parses when it dynamically creates .mount units from fstab entries. For what it's worth, it's probably a better idea to just create them as .mount units, that way you can take advantage of them as requirements or dependencies for other services. -- Jonathan Billings ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: boot/grub
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 07:31:33PM +1000, Stephen Morris wrote: > I understand this is the entry that is being booted from, but I don't > understand why it is that entry rather than boot0003, which looks to be the > vm disk partition, when I am running fedora within a vm. I don't understand > how this relates to the segmented disk image that virtualbox is using for > fedora, as it is not a physical partition as far as I am aware. Virtualbox > may make it look like a partition but I'm not up on the internal workings of > virtualbox. From the earlier message: On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 05:38:00PM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 6/1/20 4:10 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: > > Timeout: 0 seconds > > BootOrder: 0005,,0001,0003,0004 > > This is the order that the entries will be tried in. That's why it uses the Boot0005 before Boot0003 boot entry. The order is already defined. The UEFI VBOX HARDDISK entries are most likely the VBox UEFI implementation's entries to boot via the Compatibility Support Module (CSM), which is the legacy BIOS boot method. -- Jonathan Billings ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mount options for mostly-offline drives
On 2020-06-02 20:07, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-06-02 19:29, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> Doesn't seem to do anything. I've tested with this line in /etc/fstab: >> >> UUID=6cb66da2-147a-4f3c-a513-36f6164ab581 /raid ext4 >> rw,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.device-timeout=1,x-systemd.idle-timeout=60 >>0 0 >> >> followed by 'mount -a' (using a 60-second timeout for testing) but it's >> not unmounting. I also ran 'journalctl -f' but it doesn't show >> anything. > It works fine for non USB connected file systems. > > [egreshko@f31k ~]$ grep raid /etc/fstab > /dev/md0 /raid ext4 > rw,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.device-timeout=1,x-systemd.idle-timeout=60 > 1 1 > > [egreshko@f31k ~]$ date ; df --exclude-type=tmpfs --exclude-type=devtmpfs ; > ls /raid ; df --exclude-type=tmpfs --exclude-type=devtmpfs ; sleep 65 ; date > ; df --exclude-type=tmpfs --exclude-type=devtmpfs > > Tue 02 Jun 2020 08:05:08 PM CST > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > /dev/mapper/fedora_f31k-root 27663300 14113656 12121372 54% / > /dev/vda1 999320 263772 666736 29% /boot > > lost+found x > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > /dev/mapper/fedora_f31k-root 27663300 14113656 12121372 54% / > /dev/vda1 999320 263772 666736 29% /boot > /dev/md0 51310048 53272 48620644 1% /raid > > Tue 02 Jun 2020 08:06:13 PM CST > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > /dev/mapper/fedora_f31k-root 27663300 14113664 12121364 54% / > /dev/vda1 999320 263772 666736 29% /boot > Oh, and journal should these (abbreviated output) Jun 02 20:05:08 f31k.greshko.com systemd[1]: raid.automount: Got automount request for /raid, triggered by 1308 (ls) Jun 02 20:05:08 f31k.greshko.com systemd[1]: Mounting /raid... Jun 02 20:05:08 f31k.greshko.com systemd[1]: Mounted /raid. Jun 02 20:06:09 f31k.greshko.com systemd[1]: Unmounting /raid... Jun 02 20:06:09 f31k.greshko.com systemd[1014]: raid.mount: Succeeded. Jun 02 20:06:09 f31k.greshko.com systemd[1066]: raid.mount: Succeeded. Jun 02 20:06:09 f31k.greshko.com systemd[1]: raid.mount: Succeeded. Jun 02 20:06:09 f31k.greshko.com systemd[1]: Unmounted /raid. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mount options for mostly-offline drives
On 2020-06-02 19:29, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Doesn't seem to do anything. I've tested with this line in /etc/fstab: > > UUID=6cb66da2-147a-4f3c-a513-36f6164ab581 /raid ext4 > rw,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.device-timeout=1,x-systemd.idle-timeout=60 > 0 0 > > followed by 'mount -a' (using a 60-second timeout for testing) but it's > not unmounting. I also ran 'journalctl -f' but it doesn't show > anything. It works fine for non USB connected file systems. [egreshko@f31k ~]$ grep raid /etc/fstab /dev/md0 /raid ext4 rw,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.device-timeout=1,x-systemd.idle-timeout=60 1 1 [egreshko@f31k ~]$ date ; df --exclude-type=tmpfs --exclude-type=devtmpfs ; ls /raid ; df --exclude-type=tmpfs --exclude-type=devtmpfs ; sleep 65 ; date ; df --exclude-type=tmpfs --exclude-type=devtmpfs Tue 02 Jun 2020 08:05:08 PM CST Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/fedora_f31k-root 27663300 14113656 12121372 54% / /dev/vda1 999320 263772 666736 29% /boot lost+found x Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/fedora_f31k-root 27663300 14113656 12121372 54% / /dev/vda1 999320 263772 666736 29% /boot /dev/md0 51310048 53272 48620644 1% /raid Tue 02 Jun 2020 08:06:13 PM CST Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/fedora_f31k-root 27663300 14113664 12121364 54% / /dev/vda1 999320 263772 666736 29% /boot -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: gnome-system-monitor with IO?
On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 11:26 +0200, Bob Marcan wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 23:11:40 -0700 > ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Anyone know of a substitute /usr/bin/gnome-system-monitor > > that will show IO, like iotop, but with a gui? > > > > Many thanks, > > -T > > Not gui, but ... > > Name : atop > Version : 2.5.0 > Release : 2.fc32 > Architecture : x86_64 > Size : 173 k > Source : atop-2.5.0-2.fc32.src.rpm > Repository : fedora > Summary : An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and > process level > URL : http://www.atcomputing.nl/Tools/atop/ > License : GPLv2+ > Description : An advanced interactive monitor for Linux-systems to view the > load on > : system-level and process-level. > : The command atop has some major advantages compared to other > : performance-monitors: > :- Resource consumption by all processes > :- Utilization of all relevant resources > :- Permanent logging of resource utilization > :- Highlight critical resources > :- Watch activity only > :- Watch deviations only > :- Accumulated process activity per user > :- Accumulated process activity per program > : For more informations: http://www.atcomputing.nl/Tools/atop > : The package does not make use of the patches available at > : http://www.atcomputing.nl/Tools/atop/kernpatch.html I find 'glances' works well for me. Again, not GUI but I run it in a Yakuake terminal so it's always there when I hit F12. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mount options for mostly-offline drives
On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 11:57 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 18:18 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 2020-06-02 17:57, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > I have a powered USB dock with a couple of SATA drives configured as > > > RAID1, and used only for nightly backups. The (minimal) manual for the > > > dock tells me it will power down after 30 minutes idle time, however I > > > don't see this happening. I presume that something (such as the md > > > system) is touching the drives periodically. > > > > > > What is the fstab option to have the drives mounted only when accessed? > > > This used to be automount (or autofs) but with systemd getting its > > > fingers into everything I know longer know how to do this. > > > > > > Can the drive be automatically unmounted if not in use? I presume this > > > would stop md from trying to check it and hence prevent the dock from > > > keeping it powered on. > > > > I've not tried the timeouts But I think you are looking for these > > options > > > > x-systemd.automount, x-systemd.device-timeout=10, > > x-systemd.idle-timeout=1800 > > > > I use x-systemd.automount for nfs4 mounts but the NAS takes care of > > spinning down. > > Thanks Ed. I managed to find the man pages under systemd-mount(1) but > it took a while. The man page for mount(1) should have a reference but > doesn't. Doesn't seem to do anything. I've tested with this line in /etc/fstab: UUID=6cb66da2-147a-4f3c-a513-36f6164ab581 /raid ext4 rw,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.device-timeout=1,x-systemd.idle-timeout=60 0 0 followed by 'mount -a' (using a 60-second timeout for testing) but it's not unmounting. I also ran 'journalctl -f' but it doesn't show anything. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
installation of F32 onto a ext. disk with 3 partitions
Hi,I tried to install F32 on one partition of an external disk with 3 partitions. I could not choose the partition I wanted, there was no choice, which I have had in F31 and previously. Is the only way to overwrite F31 in a 3 partitions disk an uograde F31 -> F32?Kind Regards Joerg ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Multiboot question
I have two bootable disks, and SSD with F32 (and Win 10), and a HDD with F31 and a few other distros. Each disk has its own EFI partition. F32 mounts the SSD's EFI partition at /boot/efi; F31 mounts the HDD's EFI partition at /boot/efi. Both Fedoras have the appropriate entries in their respective /boot/loader/entries directories, and in both cases, GRUB_ENABLE_BLSCFG is set to true. If I update the F31 kernel, then boot off the SSD, I am not offered the option of booting F31 with the new kernel unless I regenerate the SSD's boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg. What I want is for the SSD's bootloader to automatically offer me the option of booting any kernel configured in the F31's /boot/loader/entries, rather than offering me only the options in its own /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg. Is this even possible? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mount options for mostly-offline drives
On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 18:18 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-06-02 17:57, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I have a powered USB dock with a couple of SATA drives configured as > > RAID1, and used only for nightly backups. The (minimal) manual for the > > dock tells me it will power down after 30 minutes idle time, however I > > don't see this happening. I presume that something (such as the md > > system) is touching the drives periodically. > > > > What is the fstab option to have the drives mounted only when accessed? > > This used to be automount (or autofs) but with systemd getting its > > fingers into everything I know longer know how to do this. > > > > Can the drive be automatically unmounted if not in use? I presume this > > would stop md from trying to check it and hence prevent the dock from > > keeping it powered on. > > I've not tried the timeouts But I think you are looking for these options > > x-systemd.automount, x-systemd.device-timeout=10, x-systemd.idle-timeout=1800 > > I use x-systemd.automount for nfs4 mounts but the NAS takes care of spinning > down. Thanks Ed. I managed to find the man pages under systemd-mount(1) but it took a while. The man page for mount(1) should have a reference but doesn't. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
build package
Hello, I am rebuilding the perl packages that I need. perl-Math-GSL-0.40.tar.gz rpmbuild -bb perl-Math-GSL.spec gives an error: Checking for GSL using gsl-config Found GSL 2.6 (via gsl-config) installed in /usr Checking if gcc supports "-Wall"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-sometimes-uninitialized"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-function"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-value"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-function"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-unused-variable"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-Wno-gnu"...yes Checking if gcc supports "-g"...yes unsupported version: 2.6 at Build.PL line 77. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.I4k1Cb (%build) Checking on the Build.PL file; it seems to be due to my $ver2func = Ver2Func->new( $gsl_conf->{gsl_version} ); The same version of perl-Math-GSL compiled fine with fc30. (same version of cpanspec) Now the gsl version is 2.6 (2.4 before) Do I need to recompile gsl ? === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 === ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
On Tue, 02 Jun 2020 19:29:51 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > Patrick Dupre wrote: > >> This has been solved by > >> > >> rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 > > Michael Schwendt: > > The good old "rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK" would have been enough for the > > most common use case. > > Don't you have to do up to the first dot? > > i.e. rpm -q perl-PDL-LAPACK-0 No. The simplified package naming scheme here is N-V-R.A as in "Name-Version-Release.Arch", and specifying the name would be enough when only a single package of that name is installed. Even if the name included one or more characters like '-', '_' or '.'. In dependencies related output you will also see N:E-V-R.Arch if the Epoch tag is set for a package, but when using rpm/dnf, specifying the Epoch is only needed in corner-cases. Putting a numerical "Version" and '.' characters into the package name can break quite some tools and scripts that strictly expect a simple N-V-R scheme. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: windows10 disk not showing up
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 at 23:08, Tim via users wrote: > On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 15:55 -0600, Joe Zeff wrote: > > If the CMOS battery is going bad, there will be a lot more problems > > than just losing the settings of one drive! If none of the other > > settings are giving trouble, it's not the battery. > > I do wonder about that. How many BIOS settings are ignored post-boot? > And how many things are left at default by users who never customise > their system? > Some old 7x24 systems continue to work fine running linux and getting time from the network long after the battery has failed. I assume there are differences in the way a BIOS deals with a bad battery. A well engineered system should detect a battery problem and use defaults. I have seen warning messages about a bad CMOS checksum. -- George N. White III ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mount options for mostly-offline drives
On 2020-06-02 17:57, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > I have a powered USB dock with a couple of SATA drives configured as > RAID1, and used only for nightly backups. The (minimal) manual for the > dock tells me it will power down after 30 minutes idle time, however I > don't see this happening. I presume that something (such as the md > system) is touching the drives periodically. > > What is the fstab option to have the drives mounted only when accessed? > This used to be automount (or autofs) but with systemd getting its > fingers into everything I know longer know how to do this. > > Can the drive be automatically unmounted if not in use? I presume this > would stop md from trying to check it and hence prevent the dock from > keeping it powered on. I've not tried the timeouts But I think you are looking for these options x-systemd.automount, x-systemd.device-timeout=10, x-systemd.idle-timeout=1800 I use x-systemd.automount for nfs4 mounts but the NAS takes care of spinning down. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
Patrick Dupre wrote: >> This has been solved by >> >> rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 Michael Schwendt: > The good old "rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK" would have been enough for the > most common use case. Don't you have to do up to the first dot? i.e. rpm -q perl-PDL-LAPACK-0 -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1127.8.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue May 12 16:57:42 UTC 2020 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Mount options for mostly-offline drives
I have a powered USB dock with a couple of SATA drives configured as RAID1, and used only for nightly backups. The (minimal) manual for the dock tells me it will power down after 30 minutes idle time, however I don't see this happening. I presume that something (such as the md system) is touching the drives periodically. What is the fstab option to have the drives mounted only when accessed? This used to be automount (or autofs) but with systemd getting its fingers into everything I know longer know how to do this. Can the drive be automatically unmounted if not in use? I presume this would stop md from trying to check it and hence prevent the dock from keeping it powered on. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: boot/grub
On 2/6/20 10:38 am, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 6/1/20 4:10 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: I am confused by this process as well. If I issue the command efibootmgr -v I get the following output, and, I don't understand how that information relates to the segmented disk image that is being used when Fedora is run from a virtualbox vm running under windows, and in particular when I am booting Fedora via grub. What part of it do you not understand? efibootmgr -v BootCurrent: 0005 This is the entry you're currently running. Timeout: 0 seconds BootOrder: 0005,,0001,0003,0004 This is the order that the entries will be tried in. Boot0005* Fedora HD(1,GPT,5a166b43-c099-429b-9587-4cc29389e1cf,0x800,0x12c000)/File(\EFI\fedora\shimx64.efi) I don't know the all the specific details, but this entry describes how to load the grub bootloader to start Fedora: "HD(1,GPT,5a166b43-c099-429b-9587-4cc29389e1cf,0x800,0x12c000)" identifies the hard drive and EFI partition to use. "File(\EFI\fedora\shimx64.efi)" gives the path to the executable file on that partition to load and run. I understand this is the entry that is being booted from, but I don't understand why it is that entry rather than boot0003, which looks to be the vm disk partition, when I am running fedora within a vm. I don't understand how this relates to the segmented disk image that virtualbox is using for fedora, as it is not a physical partition as far as I am aware. Virtualbox may make it look like a partition but I'm not up on the internal workings of virtualbox. regards, Steve ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: gnome-system-monitor with IO?
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 23:11:40 -0700 ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Hi All, > > Anyone know of a substitute /usr/bin/gnome-system-monitor > that will show IO, like iotop, but with a gui? > > Many thanks, > -T Not gui, but ... Name : atop Version : 2.5.0 Release : 2.fc32 Architecture : x86_64 Size : 173 k Source : atop-2.5.0-2.fc32.src.rpm Repository : fedora Summary : An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level URL : http://www.atcomputing.nl/Tools/atop/ License : GPLv2+ Description : An advanced interactive monitor for Linux-systems to view the load on : system-level and process-level. : The command atop has some major advantages compared to other : performance-monitors: :- Resource consumption by all processes :- Utilization of all relevant resources :- Permanent logging of resource utilization :- Highlight critical resources :- Watch activity only :- Watch deviations only :- Accumulated process activity per user :- Accumulated process activity per program : For more informations: http://www.atcomputing.nl/Tools/atop : The package does not make use of the patches available at : http://www.atcomputing.nl/Tools/atop/kernpatch.html BR, Bob ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
On 6/2/20 12:57 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 00:25:59 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 The good old "rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK" would have been enough for the most common use case. Maybe you missed the original message where he tried the equivalent of that with dnf. There's something funny with the package name. I'm guessing that the version is part of the name for some reason. Then whoever created that package needs to be told. ;-) My understanding was that it was a package he made himself, so I think he's been told. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 00:25:59 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > >> rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 > > > > The good old "rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK" would have been enough for the > > most common use case. > > Maybe you missed the original message where he tried the equivalent of > that with dnf. There's something funny with the package name. I'm > guessing that the version is part of the name for some reason. Then whoever created that package needs to be told. ;-) ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
On 6/2/20 12:14 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 23:12:06 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: This has been solved by rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 The good old "rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK" would have been enough for the most common use case. Maybe you missed the original message where he tried the equivalent of that with dnf. There's something funny with the package name. I'm guessing that the version is part of the name for some reason. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 23:12:06 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > This has been solved by > > rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 The good old "rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK" would have been enough for the most common use case. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org