Re: Redirect spam to mailbox
At 07:37 PM 1/21/2008, Rubin Bennett wrote: On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 19:22 -0800, Evan Platt wrote: > Please reply to the list, not me. > True, but I've posted that post several times :) Didn't want to duplicate my answer. I've sent *this* reply to the list however :) Yep.. Maybe was worth sending to the OP, not me. I knew what SA can and can't do. :) So the slightly longer answer to your question is that you need to tell your Mail Delivery Agent to sort the message, be it Procmail, Postfix, or whatever you use. Some MDA's are smarter and more flexible than others, but almost all have the ability to sort. Worst case, you can tell your mail client to sort for you (although this is cumbersome, and a PIA to maintain if you have more that one client from which you access your mail). Umm.. Not my question. ;)
Re: Redirect spam to mailbox
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 19:22 -0800, Evan Platt wrote: > Please reply to the list, not me. > True, but I've posted that post several times :) Didn't want to duplicate my answer. I've sent *this* reply to the list however :) > But... > > "Spamassassin: TAGS Spam, but IT DOES NOT DO ANYTHING ELSE TO IT!!! > It Can't delete your spam, it can't reply to it. It can't forward it. > It looks at it, and either marks it as spam or not. That's it. Period. " > > Yep. > So the slightly longer answer to your question is that you need to tell your Mail Delivery Agent to sort the message, be it Procmail, Postfix, or whatever you use. Some MDA's are smarter and more flexible than others, but almost all have the ability to sort. Worst case, you can tell your mail client to sort for you (although this is cumbersome, and a PIA to maintain if you have more that one client from which you access your mail). Rubin > At 06:59 PM 1/21/2008, Rubin Bennett wrote: > >Old, but still has value... > >http://thatitguy.com/?target=sa-howto > > > >Rubin > > > >On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 18:49 -0800, Evan Platt wrote: > > > At 06:22 PM 1/21/2008, Matsaki wrote: > > > > > > >I should be able to do this in spamassain as well as you can have > > > >training > > > >etc. and sending SPAM: classified messages to a chosen mailbox, ie, spam. > > > > > > Spamassassin has no such capability to send messages to a chosen mailbox. > > > > > > >That's what I was reading in the spamassassin wiiki? > > > > > > Please quote what you saw that said spamassassin has that capability. > > > > >-- > >Rubin Bennett > >rbTechnologies > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >http://thatitguy.com > >(802)223-4448 > > > >"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little > >temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." > > -Ben Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759 > -- Rubin Bennett rbTechnologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://thatitguy.com (802)223-4448 "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Ben Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
Re: Redirect spam to mailbox
At 06:22 PM 1/21/2008, Matsaki wrote: I should be able to do this in spamassain as well as you can have training etc. and sending SPAM: classified messages to a chosen mailbox, ie, spam. Spamassassin has no such capability to send messages to a chosen mailbox. That's what I was reading in the spamassassin wiiki? Please quote what you saw that said spamassassin has that capability.
Re: Redirect spam to mailbox
I should be able to do this in spamassain as well as you can have training etc. and sending SPAM: classified messages to a chosen mailbox, ie, spam. That's what I was reading in the spamassassin wiiki? mouss-2 wrote: > > Matsaki wrote: >> New to spamassassin I now got it up and running on my server with ubuntu, >> postfix, dovecot. >> >> The only problem I have now is that i have created a mailaccount called >> "spamtrap" but I can't manage to get the SPAM: classified email >> redirected >> to the mailbox. So some help would be appreciated. >> > > that's a job for your MTA or MDA. > - if you deliver mail using the dovecot lda, then you can ask on either > postfix or dovecot lists > - if you deliver mail using postfix (no external LDA), then ask on the > postfix list > > When doing so, please > - show how you are delivering mail > - how you are filtering mail. > > consider using amavisd-new where you can redirect spam (for example to > [EMAIL PROTECTED], then depending on user prefs, you can alias the > latter to your spamtrap). > > Note that this is not really a spamtrap... it's just a Junk mailbox. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Redirect-spam-to-mailbox-tp15005825p15011300.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: The googolbees are getting craftier
Whoops! Just noticed I didn't send this to the list after all... On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, John D. Hardin wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Loren Wilton wrote: > > > I guess btnl is no longer working. Now they are doing a redirect: > > > > http://google.co.uk///pagead/iclk?sa=l&ai=livermore&num=970&adurl=http://christmas-low-rate.tw?beast > > Combined rule: > > uri GOOG_MALWARE_URI > m,https?://(?:[^\./]+\.)*goo+gle(?:pages)?\.(?:[a-z][a-z][a-z]?(?:\.[a-z][a-z])?)/+.*[?&](?:btni|adurl),i -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 --- Vista "security improvements" consist of attempting to shift blame onto the user when things go wrong. --- Today: John Moses Browning's 153rd Birthday
Re: google spams
mouss wrote:
uri GOOGLE_SEARCH_BTNIm{gooo?gle\..*/search.*btnI=}
Loose the last equals sign, I've seen similar samples come through
without it.
david
Re: How install spamassassin with vhcs2
Theo Van Dinter schrieb: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 12:25:40PM +0100, Outlaw wrote: >> How install spamassassin with vhcs2? I search in google but I found >> anything. > > What is vhcs2? This sounds more like a question for them than us. > its an admin gui for isp style webhosting as far i remember , their website seems to be down right now -- Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Re: How install spamassassin with vhcs2
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 12:25:40PM +0100, Outlaw wrote: > How install spamassassin with vhcs2? I search in google but I found > anything. What is vhcs2? This sounds more like a question for them than us. -- Randomly Selected Tagline: "In any free society, the conflict between social conformity and individual liberty is permanent, unresolvable, and necessary." - Kathleen Norris pgpVg4NUTkv8D.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: google spams
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, JP Kelly wrote: > > JP Kelly wrote: > > >> I am not able to write my own rules or regex. Does that mean "I don't know how to write regular expressions", or "my SA install doesn't permit me to add rules"? If the former, then the rules I and others have posted over the past week will work. Use my rule, or the rulesets others have posted. If the latter, then ask whoever *can* add rules to your SA to add some google rules - point them at the list archives. If you do have the adminstrative rights to add rules but you don't know how to do that, that's another topic - "how do I add custom rules?" - that has nothing do do with Google spams per se. > http://google.com//search?hl=en&q=inurl:rhtawy.com%2BVPXL%2BMade%2BEasy&btnI=79547 Yeah, that's what we've posted rules for. -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 --- USMC Rules of Gunfighting #20: The faster you finish the fight, the less shot you will get. --- Today: John Moses Browning's 153rd Birthday
Re: Guidance needed...
- Original Message - >Shortcircuiting[1] makes a big difference here. My average scan time is >2.7 seconds (200k messages, full network tests and 2x1Ghz Sun server, >includes some amavisd-new overhead). Almost 40% of my traffic is simply >shortcircuited with (BAYES_00 && RELAY_XX) rule. My bayes works very well >and messages originating from my country is another sure sign of ham. >Another 10% by WHITELIST_* rules. I probably could get away with just >using BAYES_00 alone for shortcircuiting, but I don't need the extra >performance. So profile your traffic and find common patterns. > >[1] http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ShortcircuitingRuleset I'll look into the link, thanks. What exactly do you mean by profiling? I've been racking my brains on how to gather a quantity of email from my users and then figure out a way to read through them to decide if they are ham or spam. No matter how I look at it, it seems a monumental job to me. So I went with the idea of checking which rules trigger and which don't. = Kevin W. Gagel Network Administrator Information Technology Services (250) 562-2131 local 5448 My Blog: http://mail.cnc.bc.ca/blogs/gagel My File share: http://mail.cnc.bc.ca/users/gagel --- The College of New Caledonia, Visit us at http://www.cnc.bc.ca Virus scanning is done on all incoming and outgoing email. Anti-spam information for CNC can be found at http://gateway.cnc.bc.ca ---
Re: Redirect spam to mailbox
Matsaki wrote: New to spamassassin I now got it up and running on my server with ubuntu, postfix, dovecot. The only problem I have now is that i have created a mailaccount called "spamtrap" but I can't manage to get the SPAM: classified email redirected to the mailbox. So some help would be appreciated. that's a job for your MTA or MDA. - if you deliver mail using the dovecot lda, then you can ask on either postfix or dovecot lists - if you deliver mail using postfix (no external LDA), then ask on the postfix list When doing so, please - show how you are delivering mail - how you are filtering mail. consider using amavisd-new where you can redirect spam (for example to [EMAIL PROTECTED], then depending on user prefs, you can alias the latter to your spamtrap). Note that this is not really a spamtrap... it's just a Junk mailbox.
Re: Redirect spam to mailbox
At 12:32 PM 1/21/2008, Matsaki wrote: New to spamassassin I now got it up and running on my server with ubuntu, postfix, dovecot. The only problem I have now is that i have created a mailaccount called "spamtrap" but I can't manage to get the SPAM: classified email redirected to the mailbox. So some help would be appreciated. SpamAssassin can't do this. You'd need to use procmail or another such method.
Redirect spam to mailbox
New to spamassassin I now got it up and running on my server with ubuntu, postfix, dovecot. The only problem I have now is that i have created a mailaccount called "spamtrap" but I can't manage to get the SPAM: classified email redirected to the mailbox. So some help would be appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Redirect-spam-to-mailbox-tp15005825p15005825.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: google spams
JP Kelly wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: She'll Beg for More..
Date: January 21, 2008 10:34:15 AM PST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on
jpkvideo.net
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.5 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_99,MISSING_MID, RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no
version=3.2.3
Received: (qmail 8030 invoked by uid 110); 21 Jan 2008 08:35:21 -0800
Received: (qmail 7999 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2008 08:35:20
-0800
Received: from 190.75-207-15.dyn.dsl.cantv.net (HELO
equipo05.cantv.net) (190.75.207.15) by smallgod.com with SMTP; 21 Jan
2008 08:35:19 -0800
Received-Spf: none (smallgod.com: domain at bloggingstocks.com
does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
body:
--
Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:34:15 -0100
http://google.com//search?hl=en&q=inurl:rhtawy.com%2BVPXL%2BMade%2BEasy&btnI=79547
so that's similar to the one discussed in the thread
"Re: Googlepages & Livefilestore spams"
see that thread and look for a message by Ben Lentz (10-10-2008 04:56).
maybe something like this (Warning: untested):
uri GOOGLE_SEARCH_BTNIm{gooo?gle\..*/search.*btnI=}
score GOOGLE_SEARCH_BTNI 2.0
describe GOOGLE_SEARCH_BTNI contains
PS. who is smallgod.com? I would block the blasphematory MTA ;-p
If it's your MTA, then see if the PBL is safe for you to use at the MTA
level.
Re: google spams
On Jan 21, 2008, at 9:26 AM, mouss wrote: JP Kelly wrote: Enough is enough! SA has been working so well for me all these years I guess I am spoiled. I woke up this morning and had 5 Google spams and one legit email and I've had it. I noticed a somewhat lengthy discussion on the subject here. I am not able to write my own rules or regex. Is there a quick and dirty way to give these spams a higher score? I am using SA 3.2.3 and these message typically score around 4.5. show samples. Otherwise, it's hard to know that everybody is talking about the same spam. here is a typical example: -- headers: -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:She'll Beg for More.. Date: January 21, 2008 10:34:15 AM PST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on jpkvideo.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,MISSING_MID, RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.3 Received: (qmail 8030 invoked by uid 110); 21 Jan 2008 08:35:21 -0800 Received: (qmail 7999 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2008 08:35:20 -0800 Received: from 190.75-207-15.dyn.dsl.cantv.net (HELO equipo05.cantv.net) (190.75.207.15) by smallgod.com with SMTP; 21 Jan 2008 08:35:19 -0800 Received-Spf: none (smallgod.com: domain at bloggingstocks.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit body: -- Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:34:15 -0100 http://google.com//search?hl=en&q=inurl:rhtawy.com%2BVPXL%2BMade%2BEasy&btnI=79547
Re: google spams
JP Kelly wrote: Enough is enough! SA has been working so well for me all these years I guess I am spoiled. I woke up this morning and had 5 Google spams and one legit email and I've had it. I noticed a somewhat lengthy discussion on the subject here. I am not able to write my own rules or regex. Is there a quick and dirty way to give these spams a higher score? I am using SA 3.2.3 and these message typically score around 4.5. show samples. Otherwise, it's hard to know that everybody is talking about the same spam.
RE: Guidance needed...
Kevin W. Gagel wrote: > I've been researching what rules get hit on my system. To do that I've > writen a small script to pull together a list of all the rules that > SA is using on my system and another to parse my log files to see > what rules were triggered, how often and how long it took to scan the > messages. > > I used a full month worth of data. I have 2,827 (give or take a few > for script logic errors) rules that SA checks on each message. For > December I had 256,542 messages that made it through blacklists and > then were evaluated by SA. A total of 1,087 rules were tripped in all > of those messages. > > Looking at the list of tripped rules (and how many times it was > tripped) and how long it took to process all of those messages (a > total of 569.732 hours) I wondered if I could improve performance by > cutting out rules that were not tripped or only tripped a very small > number of times. > > What I need guidance on, is this... > > I see multiple rules with descriptions writen in other languages to > catch the same thing as the english one. Are these treated by SA as > seperate rules, testing the message against each language? > > Before I go setting up scores of zero's for rules I think don't need > to be run, am I correct in thinking that setting the score to zero > will keep SA from running the rule? I seem to recall seeing emails on > the list that indicate that but others that say the rule is still > run... > > Any advice on this would be welcome. Yes, if you set the score to 0, the rule will not be run. I think there have been one or two bugs that caused this not to work in some circumstances, but this is the correct way to disable a rule. The multiple language descriptions are probably just from the different language files. The main thing is the rule name. If the rule name is the same, it's just a translated description. If the rule name is different, it's a different rule. -- Bowie
google spams
Enough is enough! SA has been working so well for me all these years I guess I am spoiled. I woke up this morning and had 5 Google spams and one legit email and I've had it. I noticed a somewhat lengthy discussion on the subject here. I am not able to write my own rules or regex. Is there a quick and dirty way to give these spams a higher score? I am using SA 3.2.3 and these message typically score around 4.5. Thanks.
Guidance needed...
I've been researching what rules get hit on my system. To do that I've writen a small script to pull together a list of all the rules that SA is using on my system and another to parse my log files to see what rules were triggered, how often and how long it took to scan the messages. I used a full month worth of data. I have 2,827 (give or take a few for script logic errors) rules that SA checks on each message. For December I had 256,542 messages that made it through blacklists and then were evaluated by SA. A total of 1,087 rules were tripped in all of those messages. Looking at the list of tripped rules (and how many times it was tripped) and how long it took to process all of those messages (a total of 569.732 hours) I wondered if I could improve performance by cutting out rules that were not tripped or only tripped a very small number of times. What I need guidance on, is this... I see multiple rules with descriptions writen in other languages to catch the same thing as the english one. Are these treated by SA as seperate rules, testing the message against each language? Before I go setting up scores of zero's for rules I think don't need to be run, am I correct in thinking that setting the score to zero will keep SA from running the rule? I seem to recall seeing emails on the list that indicate that but others that say the rule is still run... Any advice on this would be welcome. Thanks. = Kevin W. Gagel Network Administrator Information Technology Services (250) 562-2131 local 5448 My Blog: http://mail.cnc.bc.ca/blogs/gagel My File share: http://mail.cnc.bc.ca/users/gagel --- The College of New Caledonia, Visit us at http://www.cnc.bc.ca Virus scanning is done on all incoming and outgoing email. Anti-spam information for CNC can be found at http://gateway.cnc.bc.ca ---
OT: Not able to access spamassassin.apache.org
Hi, I think my web proxy server is in some kind of blacklist (59.163.11.70)I am not able to go to the spamassassin.apache.org. Can someone tell me what blacklist does this server use Sorry for being OT here. I cant find my ip listed anywhere but spamassassin site is blocked Thanks Ram
RE: whois plugin .. where to get it
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 13:38 +0100, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: ram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 11:47 AM > > > > I had read about the whois plugin into SA. But I cant seem to find it > > now Can someone tell me how do I install this > > You can get a copy of the uriwhois plugin at: > > http://www.tomassoni.biz/download/URIWhois-0.03.tar.bz2 > > But please read next. > > > > I beleive that could be a very effective idea to score on domain names > > who have bad registrars > > The uriwhois plugin doesn't do that. The thing closest to this, that it > allows to, is to put scores on nameserver addresses used to propagate the > domain entries of spammed uris. In example, if you find that a set of > well-known spams are advertizing uris whose domains are announced always > through 1.1.1.1 and 1.1.1.2 nameservers, then you can put a SA rule to let > all the uris whose domain is announced trough these NSes earn scores. > > uriwhois also tests other things as well. In example, a uri gets a score > depending on its domain's registration age. Also, it get scored if the NSes > defined in the whois record differ partially (PARTNSMIS) or fully > (FULLNSMIS) from the ones defined in the DNS zone. > > A further test is the RFC1035IGN one, which basically would check compliance > to RFC1035 of the DNS SOA record of the domain. It checks, in example, if > the primary NS defined in the SOA record is among the NSes defined through > NS records. If it isn't, the rule triggers. I found that most sites hosted > by the Akamai's infrastructure do fire this rule, since Akamai puts a master > DNS server in the SOA, which is only used as a replication master for the > other NSes. It is not used as a public DNS server. I believe this behavior > is not RFC-1035 compliant but nevertheless, for the purposes of the uriwhois > plugin, it simply leads to FPs... > > Now I would change the RFC1035IGN test to match those domains whose NSes > don't reply to DNS SOA requests, which I see is the "reply" from spammers to > the previous behavior of this test. But this is not currently implemented. > > > > Every hour hundreds of domains get registered purely for the purpose of > > spamming. That is what I assume because I see so many new one liner > > spams with just a link to a site, and soon the site gets listed in > > URIBL* If I could just block these spammers based on their registrars > > then SA could turn very effective. I could even use this information at > > my MTA and reject mails from spamming domains > > Again, no registrar check, sorry. You could eventually use the: "uri_whois > nsname" or the "uri_whois nsaddr" tests to attempt catch these. > > I think I am missing something here. The NS address is different from the registrar. How can we score based on NS address? Can a spammer not put innocent servers as his Nameserver , as long as they allow DNS queries to his host The format of the registrar in whois information is not standardized. I wonder why. If I could do something like dig domain.tld REG ( just like dig domain.tld MX ) then life would have been so simple. Thanks Ram
Re: user_prefs rules not being used
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.1.8 on SuSE 9.3. Spamassassin is invoked through amavisd. I have a series of whitelist_from commands in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, which spamassassin recognizes. I also have allow_user_rules 1 in my local.cf. However, when I edit .spamassassin/user_prefs in my home directory to add further whitelist_from commands, spamassassin doesn't see them. Is there any obvious reason why? Um, doesn't amavis always use one user (amavis) when scanning mail?
Re: disable all network test except ...
> On Monday 21 January 2008 12:29, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On 18.01.08 13:24, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > > > I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to > > > disable all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl > > > and maybe some other blackhole lists. > > > > why? On 21.01.08 13:57, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > I like to know which DNS server is faster, bind or rbldnsd. Therefore I will > provide each server with local zone files. To prevent side effects > spamassassin should only query the zones I am able to provide. The other > queries I will disable. you can just ask :-) rbldnsd is much faster and uses much less memory than bind. However it's not fully functional DNS server and is only capable of serving simple data - just like RBL data. If you want to have local mirrors of some RBLs, just use rbldns for them and create forward zones in BIND. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. One OS to rule them all, One OS to find them, One OS to bring them all and into darkness bind them
Re: disable all network test except ...
On Monday 21 January 2008 12:29, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 18.01.08 13:24, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > > I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to > > disable all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl > > and maybe some other blackhole lists. > > why? I like to know which DNS server is faster, bind or rbldnsd. Therefore I will provide each server with local zone files. To prevent side effects spamassassin should only query the zones I am able to provide. The other queries I will disable. Greetings Stefan pgpygvjhT7zxn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Feeding SA-learn
Diego Pomatta wrote: Jari Fredriksson escribió: Hey list, Can I feed a plain text file representing just the body of a message to sa-learn? /Diego Yes you can, who to stop it? I just sent your message body as --ham, and it told it learned one message. I meant without the headers, just the body. ok thanks Well the short answer is, yes you can. The slightly longer answer is that you won't get as good results doing this, as the Bayes system uses tokens found in the complete message. By only learning on the body you will not gain any advantage for tokens found in headers. -- Anthony Peacock CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School WWW:http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/ "A CAT scan should take less time than a PET scan. For a CAT scan, they're only looking for one thing, whereas a PET scan could result in a lot of things."- Carl Princi, 2002/07/19
Re: Feeding SA-learn
Jari Fredriksson escribió: Hey list, Can I feed a plain text file representing just the body of a message to sa-learn? /Diego Yes you can, who to stop it? I just sent your message body as --ham, and it told it learned one message. I meant without the headers, just the body. ok thanks
Re: disable all network test except ...
On 18.01.08 13:24, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to > disable all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl > and maybe some other blackhole lists. why? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. BSE = Mad Cow Desease ... BSA = Mad Software Producents Desease
Re: Feeding SA-learn
> Hey list, > > Can I feed a plain text file representing just the body > of a message to sa-learn? > > /Diego Yes you can, who to stop it? I just sent your message body as --ham, and it told it learned one message.
Re: How install spamassassin with vhcs2
- "Outlaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How install spamassassin with vhcs2? I search in google but I found > anything. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. http://vhcs.puuhis.net/wiki/index.php/Spam_/_Antivirus_filter -- Regards, -- --[ UxBoD ]-- // PGP Key: "curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84 // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84 // Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
How install spamassassin with vhcs2
How install spamassassin with vhcs2? I search in google but I found anything.
How install spamassassin with vhcs2
How install spamassassin with vhcs2? I search in google but I found anything.
Feeding SA-learn
Hey list, Can I feed a plain text file representing just the body of a message to sa-learn? /Diego
