Re: [trails-announce] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Tapestry JPA 2.0.0

2010-01-26 Thread Kalle Korhonen
Excellent job Piero!

Kalle


On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Piero Sartini  wrote:
> I am proud to announce the first release of tapestry-jpa which is now
> part of the tynamo[1] project. It features full JPA2 integration and
> provides you with all the functionalities known from tapestry's
> hibernate support. To get started, you may want to take a look at our
> Tapestry JPA Guide[2].
>
> Many thanks goes to Pierce T. Wetter who helped out with the code as
> well as to Kalle Korhonen who made this release possible by guiding me
> through tynamo's release process.
>
> Note that this module is compatible with JPA2 only and that we've
> changed the naming. Modules are now named tapestry-jpa-core and
> tapestry-jpa, the version is 2.0.0 which gives you a hint about the
> JPA version its compatible with. The artifacts are available inside
> the maven central repository.
>
>        Piero
>
> [1] http://tynamo.org
> [2] http://tynamo.org/tapestry-jpa+guide
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org



trails repo broken overnight

2008-02-29 Thread Ken in nashua



 
If your building trails to your local repo, populate javax and build with 
trails repo commented out as above.
 
This will get you by as a workaround until it is resolved.Best regards Ken in 
nashua
_
Need to know the score, the latest news, or you need your Hotmail®-get your 
"fix".
http://www.msnmobilefix.com/Default.aspx

Re: [ANN] Trails 1.1.1 release

2007-10-11 Thread Alejandro Scandroli
Hi Ted,

Yes, I did look at hibernate-search, in fact the very first full-text
search implementation in Trails was based on the first implementation
of hibernate-search. At that time it came bundled with
hibernate-annotations.
Then I moved to Compass because its integration with spring. Among
other benefits is also really easy to integrate Compass with other
persistence technologies besides hibernate.

Alejandro.

On 10/10/07, Ted Steen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thought regarding Compass. Have you been looking at hibernate-search?
> It is essential the same thing, but without the Compass dependency.
>
> Regards
> Ted
>
> 2007/10/4, Kalle Korhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hello "Trailers" :)
> >
> > Just as promised, we are happy to announce Trails 1.1.1 release! It feels
> > it's been so long, even though it was less than six months ago we hit 1.0.
> > The single biggest difference between 1.0 and 1.1 is the modularized
> > architecture. The documentation gives you an
> > overview<http://trailsframework.org/Overview?nocache>of the new
> > modules; the important thing is it allows Trails to be used in
> > more heterogenous use cases, independent of whether your project is using
> > Hibernate or Acegi. One of the other more visible changes we also made is
> > the new default user interface and layout that's designed to be compatible
> > with AppFuse so users of that project should feel right at home trying out
> > our examples. One more super-exciting feature is our first draft of
> > full-text search based on Trails-Compass integration that we have a whole
> > section about in the User
> > Guide<http://trailsframework.org/Querying+entities+and+full-text+search?nocache>.
> > The release history
> > <http://trailsframework.org/Release+history?nocache>(also copied
> > below) gives you a brief overview of the major features and a
> > summary of the 30 bugs that were fixed in this release.
> >
> > While the initial plan for 1.1 was to integrate with Tapestry 4.1.2,
> > 4.1.3contained important bug fixes for us and since it was released
> > just
> > recently, we decided to go with it for 1.1.x. We've also upgraded versions
> > of several other dependencies, check out the dependency
> > report<http://www.trailsframework.org/site/modules/trails-core/dependencies.html>to
> > see exactly what. Trails libraries are already available in
> > repo1.maven.org <http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/trailsframework/trails>.
> > We've also revamped our website to transparently blend Maven reports with
> > Confluence-based Codehaus project site. Go visit
> > http://trailsframework.organd enjoy!
> > 1.1.1 Release summary (release date 2007-10-02)
> > * Fixes minor issues in 1.1 release:
> >   o Fixed archetypes referring to snapshot versions
> >   o Added a default exception page to the archetype
> >   o Fixed an issue with validating unique entities when CGLIB
> > enhanced classes are used
> > * Branch (1.1.x) available for further maintenance releases
> >
> > 1.1 Release summary (release date 2007-09-30)
> > * Features
> >   o Move to Tapestry 4.1.3 ( DONE)
> >   o Modularization ( DONE)
> >   o Owner instance -based security ( DONE)
> >   o Search refactoring + Compass / Lucene Integration ( DONE)
> >   o Exception handling ( DONE)
> >   o New look & feel, multiple themes ( DONE)
> > * Fixed bugs in 1.1:
> >   T Key Summary
> >   Bug TRAILS-78 Editing a child object from a indexed list
> > "child" collection creates duplicates.
> >   New Feature TRAILS-30 @OneToOne needs user interface semantics
> >
> >   Bug TRAILS-50 Security Bug: infinite loop on special
> > configuration
> >   Bug TRAILS-49 Security BUG: Login.html does not render
> >   Bug     TRAILS-61     Login.html requires username/password entry
> > twice
> >   New Feature TRAILS-59     ObjectTable needs to be instrumented to
> > be able to automatically render images
> >   Bug TRAILS-56 Security is broken, ROLE_ANONYMOUS is
> > constrained from creating users - impact from merge 582
> >   Bug TRAILS-87 Property Editor is broken ... serious flawed
> > behavior semantics 4.1.2 Branch
> >   Bug TRAILS-42     Trails is not using success-cancel-refresh
> > actions listeners in its ObjectForm
> >   Bug TRAILS-85 Trails crashes stale after sitting ove

Re: Trails or Congnition ;-)

2007-10-10 Thread Christian Gruber
Heh.  I wasn't really asking - more just trying to be funny.  I've  
already asked the codehaus people.


Christian.

On 10-Oct-07, at 1:34 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:



Probably not the right list to ask that one. Trails-wise, Tobago's apt
plugin has its issues, but suffices for the purpose. Ideally, we'd  
like to

and eventually will get rid of the whole plugin in Trails.

Kalle



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Trails or Congnition ;-)

2007-10-10 Thread Kalle Korhonen
On 10/10/07, Christian Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But when is the codehaus apt plugin going to be released?  I found it
> much better than the tobago one.


Probably not the right list to ask that one. Trails-wise, Tobago's apt
plugin has its issues, but suffices for the purpose. Ideally, we'd like to
and eventually will get rid of the whole plugin in Trails.

Kalle


On 10-Oct-07, at 11:18 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
>
> > On 10/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I wanted to use either Trails or Cognition for the next project.
> >> However, Cognition seems to have ceased to exist and Trails
> >> "does not work".
> >
> >
> > I've talked with the founder of Cognition a few times, and yes, the
> > project
> > was scrapped. Trails works just fine and is stable, but you'll get a
> > better
> > response on our mailing lists. Regarding apt-plugin, it's in repo1:
> >
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/myfaces/tobago/maven-apt-plugin/1.0.11/
> > .
> > I'd check that you don't have a corrupted pom/jar in your local repo.
> >
> > Kalle
> >
> >
> > Maven does not find everything (Quick Start):
> >>
> >>
> >> Reason: Error getting POM for 'org.apache.myfaces.tobago:maven-apt-
> >> plugin'
> >> from
> >> the repository: Error transferring file
> >>  org.apache.myfaces.tobago:maven-apt-plugin:pom:1.0.11
> >>
> >> from the specified remote repositories:
> >>  tapestry-snapshots (
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hlship/tapestry-snapshot-reposit
> >> ory/),
> >>  central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2),
> >>  webobjects.mdimension.com/plugin/snapshots (
> >> http://webobjects.mdimension.com/m
> >> aven2/snapshots),
> >>  webobjects.mdimension.com/plugin/releases (
> >> http://webobjects.mdimension.com/ma
> >> ven2/releases)
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


Re: [ANN] Trails 1.1.1 release

2007-10-10 Thread Ted Steen
One thought regarding Compass. Have you been looking at hibernate-search?
It is essential the same thing, but without the Compass dependency.

Regards
Ted

2007/10/4, Kalle Korhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello "Trailers" :)
>
> Just as promised, we are happy to announce Trails 1.1.1 release! It feels
> it's been so long, even though it was less than six months ago we hit 1.0.
> The single biggest difference between 1.0 and 1.1 is the modularized
> architecture. The documentation gives you an
> overview<http://trailsframework.org/Overview?nocache>of the new
> modules; the important thing is it allows Trails to be used in
> more heterogenous use cases, independent of whether your project is using
> Hibernate or Acegi. One of the other more visible changes we also made is
> the new default user interface and layout that's designed to be compatible
> with AppFuse so users of that project should feel right at home trying out
> our examples. One more super-exciting feature is our first draft of
> full-text search based on Trails-Compass integration that we have a whole
> section about in the User
> Guide<http://trailsframework.org/Querying+entities+and+full-text+search?nocache>.
> The release history
> <http://trailsframework.org/Release+history?nocache>(also copied
> below) gives you a brief overview of the major features and a
> summary of the 30 bugs that were fixed in this release.
>
> While the initial plan for 1.1 was to integrate with Tapestry 4.1.2,
> 4.1.3contained important bug fixes for us and since it was released
> just
> recently, we decided to go with it for 1.1.x. We've also upgraded versions
> of several other dependencies, check out the dependency
> report<http://www.trailsframework.org/site/modules/trails-core/dependencies.html>to
> see exactly what. Trails libraries are already available in
> repo1.maven.org <http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/trailsframework/trails>.
> We've also revamped our website to transparently blend Maven reports with
> Confluence-based Codehaus project site. Go visit
> http://trailsframework.organd enjoy!
> 1.1.1 Release summary (release date 2007-10-02)
> * Fixes minor issues in 1.1 release:
>   o Fixed archetypes referring to snapshot versions
>   o Added a default exception page to the archetype
>   o Fixed an issue with validating unique entities when CGLIB
> enhanced classes are used
> * Branch (1.1.x) available for further maintenance releases
>
> 1.1 Release summary (release date 2007-09-30)
> * Features
>   o Move to Tapestry 4.1.3 ( DONE)
>   o Modularization ( DONE)
>   o Owner instance -based security ( DONE)
>   o Search refactoring + Compass / Lucene Integration ( DONE)
>   o Exception handling ( DONE)
>   o New look & feel, multiple themes ( DONE)
> * Fixed bugs in 1.1:
>   T Key Summary
>   Bug TRAILS-78 Editing a child object from a indexed list
> "child" collection creates duplicates.
>   New Feature TRAILS-30 @OneToOne needs user interface semantics
>
>   Bug TRAILS-50 Security Bug: infinite loop on special
> configuration
>   Bug TRAILS-49 Security BUG: Login.html does not render
>   Bug TRAILS-61 Login.html requires username/password entry
> twice
>   New Feature TRAILS-59 ObjectTable needs to be instrumented to
> be able to automatically render images
>   Bug TRAILS-56 Security is broken, ROLE_ANONYMOUS is
> constrained from creating users - impact from merge 582
>   Bug TRAILS-87 Property Editor is broken ... serious flawed
> behavior semantics 4.1.2 Branch
>   Bug TRAILS-42 Trails is not using success-cancel-refresh
> actions listeners in its ObjectForm
>   Bug     TRAILS-85 Trails crashes stale after sitting overnight
>   Bug TRAILS-86 Custom Editors no longer possible in trails
> OGNL-105 OGNL-111
>   Bug TRAILS-81     regression:OneToOne decoration faulty...HARD
> OneToOne associations broken
>   Bug TRAILS-33 hasCyclicRelationships solution is merging on
> entities not persisted yet
>   Bug TRAILS-3 trails-archetype generates a ${basedir} directory
>   New Feature TRAILS-37 remove Tapernate
>   Task TRAILS-38 re-modularize Trails
>   Improvement TRAILS-40 upgrade to Spring 2.0.6 and Tapestry
> 4.1.2
>   Improvement     TRAILS-52 The pages ServiceEncoder should use the
> extension ".page" (so should the filters)
>   Improvement TRAILS-66 login page needs a proper tapestry form
>   New Feature

Re: Trails or Congnition ;-)

2007-10-10 Thread Kalle Korhonen
On 10/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I wanted to use either Trails or Cognition for the next project.
> However, Cognition seems to have ceased to exist and Trails
> "does not work".


I've talked with the founder of Cognition a few times, and yes, the project
was scrapped. Trails works just fine and is stable, but you'll get a better
response on our mailing lists. Regarding apt-plugin, it's in repo1:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/myfaces/tobago/maven-apt-plugin/1.0.11/.
I'd check that you don't have a corrupted pom/jar in your local repo.

Kalle


Maven does not find everything (Quick Start):
>
>
> Reason: Error getting POM for 'org.apache.myfaces.tobago:maven-apt-plugin'
> from
> the repository: Error transferring file
>   org.apache.myfaces.tobago:maven-apt-plugin:pom:1.0.11
>
> from the specified remote repositories:
>   tapestry-snapshots (
> http://people.apache.org/~hlship/tapestry-snapshot-reposit
> ory/),
>   central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2),
>   webobjects.mdimension.com/plugin/snapshots (
> http://webobjects.mdimension.com/m
> aven2/snapshots),
>   webobjects.mdimension.com/plugin/releases (
> http://webobjects.mdimension.com/ma
> ven2/releases)
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


Re: Trails or Congnition ;-)

2007-10-10 Thread Christian Gruber
But when is the codehaus apt plugin going to be released?  I found it  
much better than the tobago one.


Christian.

On 10-Oct-07, at 11:18 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:


On 10/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I wanted to use either Trails or Cognition for the next project.
However, Cognition seems to have ceased to exist and Trails
"does not work".



I've talked with the founder of Cognition a few times, and yes, the  
project
was scrapped. Trails works just fine and is stable, but you'll get a  
better

response on our mailing lists. Regarding apt-plugin, it's in repo1:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/myfaces/tobago/maven-apt-plugin/1.0.11/ 
.

I'd check that you don't have a corrupted pom/jar in your local repo.

Kalle


Maven does not find everything (Quick Start):



Reason: Error getting POM for 'org.apache.myfaces.tobago:maven-apt- 
plugin'

from
the repository: Error transferring file
 org.apache.myfaces.tobago:maven-apt-plugin:pom:1.0.11

from the specified remote repositories:
 tapestry-snapshots (
http://people.apache.org/~hlship/tapestry-snapshot-reposit
ory/),
 central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2),
 webobjects.mdimension.com/plugin/snapshots (
http://webobjects.mdimension.com/m
aven2/snapshots),
 webobjects.mdimension.com/plugin/releases (
http://webobjects.mdimension.com/ma
ven2/releases)


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Trails or Congnition ;-)

2007-10-10 Thread Alejandro Scandroli
Hi

I'm having no problems with Trails. ;-)
>From your log, it looks like a maven/network problem. Try again, and
again, and if you keep having this problem try deleting your local
copy of the apt plugin.
If you decide to go with Trails you are welcome to join us in our
users mailing list:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Saludos.
Alejandro.

On 10/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wanted to use either Trails or Cognition for the next project.
>
> However, Cognition seems to have ceased to exist and Trails
> "does not work".
>
> Maven does not find everything (Quick Start):
>
>
> Reason: Error getting POM for 'org.apache.myfaces.tobago:maven-apt-plugin' 
> from
> the repository: Error transferring file
>   org.apache.myfaces.tobago:maven-apt-plugin:pom:1.0.11
>
> from the specified remote repositories:
>   tapestry-snapshots 
> (http://people.apache.org/~hlship/tapestry-snapshot-reposit
> ory/),
>   central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2),
>   webobjects.mdimension.com/plugin/snapshots 
> (http://webobjects.mdimension.com/m
> aven2/snapshots),
>   webobjects.mdimension.com/plugin/releases 
> (http://webobjects.mdimension.com/ma
> ven2/releases)
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Trails or Congnition ;-)

2007-10-10 Thread munich
I wanted to use either Trails or Cognition for the next project.

However, Cognition seems to have ceased to exist and Trails 
"does not work".

Maven does not find everything (Quick Start):


Reason: Error getting POM for 'org.apache.myfaces.tobago:maven-apt-plugin' from
the repository: Error transferring file
  org.apache.myfaces.tobago:maven-apt-plugin:pom:1.0.11

from the specified remote repositories:
  tapestry-snapshots (http://people.apache.org/~hlship/tapestry-snapshot-reposit
ory/),
  central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2),
  webobjects.mdimension.com/plugin/snapshots (http://webobjects.mdimension.com/m
aven2/snapshots),
  webobjects.mdimension.com/plugin/releases (http://webobjects.mdimension.com/ma
ven2/releases)


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [ANN] Trails 1.1.1 release

2007-10-06 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
Thanks for all the effort.

I can tell you that Trails demos pretty darn well when I show it off
as part of No Fluff Just Stuff.

I'm looking forward to Trails 5 for Tapestry 5 !

On 10/4/07, Kalle Korhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello "Trailers" :)
>
> Just as promised, we are happy to announce Trails 1.1.1 release! It feels
> it's been so long, even though it was less than six months ago we hit 1.0.
> The single biggest difference between 1.0 and 1.1 is the modularized
> architecture. The documentation gives you an
> overview<http://trailsframework.org/Overview?nocache>of the new
> modules; the important thing is it allows Trails to be used in
> more heterogenous use cases, independent of whether your project is using
> Hibernate or Acegi. One of the other more visible changes we also made is
> the new default user interface and layout that's designed to be compatible
> with AppFuse so users of that project should feel right at home trying out
> our examples. One more super-exciting feature is our first draft of
> full-text search based on Trails-Compass integration that we have a whole
> section about in the User
> Guide<http://trailsframework.org/Querying+entities+and+full-text+search?nocache>.
> The release history
> <http://trailsframework.org/Release+history?nocache>(also copied
> below) gives you a brief overview of the major features and a
> summary of the 30 bugs that were fixed in this release.
>
> While the initial plan for 1.1 was to integrate with Tapestry 4.1.2,
> 4.1.3contained important bug fixes for us and since it was released
> just
> recently, we decided to go with it for 1.1.x. We've also upgraded versions
> of several other dependencies, check out the dependency
> report<http://www.trailsframework.org/site/modules/trails-core/dependencies.html>to
> see exactly what. Trails libraries are already available in
> repo1.maven.org <http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/trailsframework/trails>.
> We've also revamped our website to transparently blend Maven reports with
> Confluence-based Codehaus project site. Go visit
> http://trailsframework.organd enjoy!
> 1.1.1 Release summary (release date 2007-10-02)
> * Fixes minor issues in 1.1 release:
>   o Fixed archetypes referring to snapshot versions
>   o Added a default exception page to the archetype
>   o Fixed an issue with validating unique entities when CGLIB
> enhanced classes are used
> * Branch (1.1.x) available for further maintenance releases
>
> 1.1 Release summary (release date 2007-09-30)
> * Features
>   o Move to Tapestry 4.1.3 ( DONE)
>   o Modularization ( DONE)
>   o Owner instance -based security ( DONE)
>   o Search refactoring + Compass / Lucene Integration ( DONE)
>   o Exception handling ( DONE)
>   o New look & feel, multiple themes ( DONE)
> * Fixed bugs in 1.1:
>   T Key Summary
>   Bug TRAILS-78 Editing a child object from a indexed list
> "child" collection creates duplicates.
>   New Feature TRAILS-30 @OneToOne needs user interface semantics
>
>   Bug TRAILS-50 Security Bug: infinite loop on special
> configuration
>   Bug TRAILS-49 Security BUG: Login.html does not render
>   Bug TRAILS-61 Login.html requires username/password entry
> twice
>   New Feature TRAILS-59 ObjectTable needs to be instrumented to
> be able to automatically render images
>   Bug TRAILS-56 Security is broken, ROLE_ANONYMOUS is
> constrained from creating users - impact from merge 582
>   Bug TRAILS-87 Property Editor is broken ... serious flawed
> behavior semantics 4.1.2 Branch
>   Bug     TRAILS-42 Trails is not using success-cancel-refresh
> actions listeners in its ObjectForm
>   Bug TRAILS-85 Trails crashes stale after sitting overnight
>   Bug TRAILS-86 Custom Editors no longer possible in trails
> OGNL-105 OGNL-111
>   Bug TRAILS-81 regression:OneToOne decoration faulty...HARD
> OneToOne associations broken
>   Bug TRAILS-33 hasCyclicRelationships solution is merging on
> entities not persisted yet
>   Bug TRAILS-3 trails-archetype generates a ${basedir} directory
>   New Feature TRAILS-37 remove Tapernate
>   Task TRAILS-38 re-modularize Trails
>   Improvement TRAILS-40 upgrade to Spring 2.0.6 and Tapestry
> 4.1.2
>   Improvement TRAILS-52 The pages ServiceEncoder should use the
> extension ".page" (so should the filters)
>   Improvement TRAILS-66 login page needs a prop

[ANN] Trails 1.1.1 release

2007-10-04 Thread Kalle Korhonen
Hello "Trailers" :)

Just as promised, we are happy to announce Trails 1.1.1 release! It feels
it's been so long, even though it was less than six months ago we hit 1.0.
The single biggest difference between 1.0 and 1.1 is the modularized
architecture. The documentation gives you an
overview<http://trailsframework.org/Overview?nocache>of the new
modules; the important thing is it allows Trails to be used in
more heterogenous use cases, independent of whether your project is using
Hibernate or Acegi. One of the other more visible changes we also made is
the new default user interface and layout that's designed to be compatible
with AppFuse so users of that project should feel right at home trying out
our examples. One more super-exciting feature is our first draft of
full-text search based on Trails-Compass integration that we have a whole
section about in the User
Guide<http://trailsframework.org/Querying+entities+and+full-text+search?nocache>.
The release history
<http://trailsframework.org/Release+history?nocache>(also copied
below) gives you a brief overview of the major features and a
summary of the 30 bugs that were fixed in this release.

While the initial plan for 1.1 was to integrate with Tapestry 4.1.2,
4.1.3contained important bug fixes for us and since it was released
just
recently, we decided to go with it for 1.1.x. We've also upgraded versions
of several other dependencies, check out the dependency
report<http://www.trailsframework.org/site/modules/trails-core/dependencies.html>to
see exactly what. Trails libraries are already available in
repo1.maven.org <http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/trailsframework/trails>.
We've also revamped our website to transparently blend Maven reports with
Confluence-based Codehaus project site. Go visit
http://trailsframework.organd enjoy!
1.1.1 Release summary (release date 2007-10-02)
* Fixes minor issues in 1.1 release:
  o Fixed archetypes referring to snapshot versions
  o Added a default exception page to the archetype
  o Fixed an issue with validating unique entities when CGLIB
enhanced classes are used
* Branch (1.1.x) available for further maintenance releases

1.1 Release summary (release date 2007-09-30)
* Features
  o Move to Tapestry 4.1.3 ( DONE)
  o Modularization ( DONE)
  o Owner instance -based security ( DONE)
  o Search refactoring + Compass / Lucene Integration ( DONE)
  o Exception handling ( DONE)
  o New look & feel, multiple themes ( DONE)
    * Fixed bugs in 1.1:
  T Key Summary
  Bug TRAILS-78 Editing a child object from a indexed list
"child" collection creates duplicates.
  New Feature TRAILS-30 @OneToOne needs user interface semantics

  Bug TRAILS-50 Security Bug: infinite loop on special
configuration
  Bug TRAILS-49 Security BUG: Login.html does not render
  Bug TRAILS-61     Login.html requires username/password entry
twice
  New Feature TRAILS-59 ObjectTable needs to be instrumented to
be able to automatically render images
  Bug TRAILS-56 Security is broken, ROLE_ANONYMOUS is
constrained from creating users - impact from merge 582
  Bug TRAILS-87 Property Editor is broken ... serious flawed
behavior semantics 4.1.2 Branch
  Bug TRAILS-42 Trails is not using success-cancel-refresh
actions listeners in its ObjectForm
  Bug TRAILS-85 Trails crashes stale after sitting overnight
  Bug TRAILS-86 Custom Editors no longer possible in trails
OGNL-105 OGNL-111
  Bug TRAILS-81 regression:OneToOne decoration faulty...HARD
OneToOne associations broken
  Bug TRAILS-33 hasCyclicRelationships solution is merging on
entities not persisted yet
  Bug TRAILS-3     trails-archetype generates a ${basedir} directory
  New Feature TRAILS-37 remove Tapernate
  Task TRAILS-38 re-modularize Trails
  Improvement TRAILS-40     upgrade to Spring 2.0.6 and Tapestry
4.1.2
  Improvement TRAILS-52 The pages ServiceEncoder should use the
extension ".page" (so should the filters)
  Improvement     TRAILS-66 login page needs a proper tapestry form
  New Feature TRAILS-82 SINGLETON Annotation required to
properly manage these at entity level
  Improvement TRAILS-48 Manual hand editing is required to
properly integrate security
  New Feature TRAILS-27 Provide facility to expose objects as
web services
  New Feature TRAILS-31 Required Fields indicator (top of page
and on each field)
  Bug TRAILS-80 @Transient should force "searchable = false"
  Task TRAILS-46 remove from IPropertyDescriptor, unused and
confusing parentClassDescriptor.
  Improvement TRAILS-69 use tapestry @Label compo

Re: Trails

2006-06-06 Thread Peter Svensson

Actually, my first trails (and tapestry) project was for a customer who had
an existing database with lots of odd relationships in it, and which I
managed to map one class at a time, by creating classes with the same name
as the tables and pasting the description into a comment. I didn't have to
make it complete but just did a couple of properties at a time by trial and
horror, and the pages just popped up, existing data and all. It was a
way-beyond-wow moment, to be sure.

Cheers,
PS

On 6/6/06, Kalle Korhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On 6/6/06, Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Really, I can't see why you _souldn't_ use trails for everything and
then
> changes the bits you need to change. If you need to do heavy whiz-bang
> end-user pages, at least you'll have your administrative pages for free.

Second that, don't see too many reasons why not to use it. If you are
starting a new project from scratch (or at least without pre-existing,
fixed schema), it's a no-brainer to use Trails to compliment Tapestry
and eliminate/reduce the glue code you normally need to write for
persistence.

Kalle


> On 6/6/06, Carl Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone, I'm looking for feedback here, I planning of using Trails
to
> > help gain speed with my Tapestry 4.0 development. Somebody use it?
Should
> > I ? What are the pinfall ? What are your advise...
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback
> >
> >
> >
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Trails

2006-06-06 Thread Kalle Korhonen

On 6/6/06, Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Really, I can't see why you _souldn't_ use trails for everything and then
changes the bits you need to change. If you need to do heavy whiz-bang
end-user pages, at least you'll have your administrative pages for free.


Second that, don't see too many reasons why not to use it. If you are
starting a new project from scratch (or at least without pre-existing,
fixed schema), it's a no-brainer to use Trails to compliment Tapestry
and eliminate/reduce the glue code you normally need to write for
persistence.

Kalle



On 6/6/06, Carl Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone, I'm looking for feedback here, I planning of using Trails to
> help gain speed with my Tapestry 4.0 development. Somebody use it? Should
> I ? What are the pinfall ? What are your advise...
>
> Thanks for your feedback
>
>
>




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Trails

2006-06-06 Thread Chris Nelson
Yes, the Trails pages are very customizable.  The
second article I did for java.net covers
customization.  We should probably move this
discussion over to the Trails mailing list.

--- Carl Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Ok, thanks, that help. Last question: Is it easy to
> change the UI after Trails generate the page ?
> Because, we have some specific needs. We won't use
> the simple layout Trails give after the generation.
> We need to modify the ui to reflect our needs.
> 
> Thanks !
> 
> - Original Message 
> From: Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tapestry users ; Carl
> Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2006 10:19:46 AM
> Subject: Re: Trails
> 
> I only use trails for my Tapestry-4 development.
> Mainly because I enjoyed the steep initial learning
> curve of tapestry and needed something to lean on.
> 
> The main reason I liked and like trails is because
> the ant scripts together with hibernate tools
> generate all tables in my MySQL database
> automatically from my POJOs. I just need to grok how
> to @annotate right, which in itself have been
> interresting, so all lookup tables, collections,
> relations, etc. gets done. 
> 
> Another big goodie is that trails have a default
> list, search and edit page for all POJOs, which are
> plain Tapestry html/page combos.  Also, there are
> ant/maven tasks to generate individual list or edit
> pages for POJOs. 
> 
> Then theres the fairly easy to use acegi security (I
> use a separate site to the same database for
> "unsecure" pages out of lazyness), with an ant task
> to add and another to initialize (create default
> tables for admin, etc.) 
> 
> Really, I can't see why you _souldn't_ use trails
> for everything and then changes the bits you need to
> change. If you need to do heavy whiz-bang end-user
> pages, at least you'll have your administrative
> pages for free. 
> 
> Cheers,
> PS
> 
> On 6/6/06, Carl Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote: Hi everyone, I'm looking for feedback here, I
> planning of using Trails to help gain speed with my
> Tapestry 4.0 development. Somebody use it? Should I
> ? What are the pinfall ? What are your advise...
> 
> Thanks for your feedback 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Trails

2006-06-06 Thread Carl Pelletier
Ok, thanks, that help. Last question: Is it easy to change the UI after Trails 
generate the page ? Because, we have some specific needs. We won't use the 
simple layout Trails give after the generation. We need to modify the ui to 
reflect our needs.

Thanks !

- Original Message 
From: Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tapestry users ; Carl Pelletier <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2006 10:19:46 AM
Subject: Re: Trails

I only use trails for my Tapestry-4 development. Mainly because I enjoyed the 
steep initial learning curve of tapestry and needed something to lean on.

The main reason I liked and like trails is because the ant scripts together 
with hibernate tools generate all tables in my MySQL database automatically 
from my POJOs. I just need to grok how to @annotate right, which in itself have 
been interresting, so all lookup tables, collections, relations, etc. gets 
done. 

Another big goodie is that trails have a default list, search and edit page for 
all POJOs, which are plain Tapestry html/page combos.  Also, there are 
ant/maven tasks to generate individual list or edit pages for POJOs. 

Then theres the fairly easy to use acegi security (I use a separate site to the 
same database for "unsecure" pages out of lazyness), with an ant task to add 
and another to initialize (create default tables for admin, etc.) 

Really, I can't see why you _souldn't_ use trails for everything and then 
changes the bits you need to change. If you need to do heavy whiz-bang end-user 
pages, at least you'll have your administrative pages for free. 

Cheers,
PS

On 6/6/06, Carl Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi everyone, I'm looking 
for feedback here, I planning of using Trails to help gain speed with my 
Tapestry 4.0 development. Somebody use it? Should I ? What are the pinfall ? 
What are your advise...

Thanks for your feedback 








Re: Trails

2006-06-06 Thread Peter Svensson

I only use trails for my Tapestry-4 development. Mainly because I enjoyed
the steep initial learning curve of tapestry and needed something to lean
on.

The main reason I liked and like trails is because the ant scripts together
with hibernate tools generate all tables in my MySQL database automatically
from my POJOs. I just need to grok how to @annotate right, which in itself
have been interresting, so all lookup tables, collections, relations, etc.
gets done.

Another big goodie is that trails have a default list, search and edit page
for all POJOs, which are plain Tapestry html/page combos.  Also, there are
ant/maven tasks to generate individual list or edit pages for POJOs.

Then theres the fairly easy to use acegi security (I use a separate site to
the same database for "unsecure" pages out of lazyness), with an ant task to
add and another to initialize (create default tables for admin, etc.)

Really, I can't see why you _souldn't_ use trails for everything and then
changes the bits you need to change. If you need to do heavy whiz-bang
end-user pages, at least you'll have your administrative pages for free.

Cheers,
PS

On 6/6/06, Carl Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi everyone, I'm looking for feedback here, I planning of using Trails to
help gain speed with my Tapestry 4.0 development. Somebody use it? Should
I ? What are the pinfall ? What are your advise...

Thanks for your feedback





Trails

2006-06-06 Thread Carl Pelletier
Hi everyone, I'm looking for feedback here, I planning of using Trails to help 
gain speed with my Tapestry 4.0 development. Somebody use it? Should I ? What 
are the pinfall ? What are your advise...

Thanks for your feedback