[WiX-users] Is it possible to have two root directories in WIX

2011-03-10 Thread Dsilva, Pramod
I need to deploy files in both C and D drives. For example File A goes to drive 
C and File B goes to drive D. I know that Wix allows you to have only one root 
directory. Is there any way I can accomplish this?

I know that one solution is to set C as the root directory in the Wix Xml and 
deploy files that go to C directory through the Wix Xml. The files that have to 
deployed to D directory then have to be deployed through a custom action.

However I want to avoid using Custom Actions and want to deploy files to both 
(C and D drives) using the same Wix Xml.

Pramod DSilva

Software Engineer

Philips Healthcare



The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally 
protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the 
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is 
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the 
original message.
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users


Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Michael Osmond
I think I hit something like that.  Try building the CA with AnyCPU as the 
platform rather than 32/64

I have got that error when I forgot the public on the class, though

Regards

Michael



-Original Message-
From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
Sent: Friday, 11 March 2011 12:05 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

Thank you Michael,

I tried

public class CustomActions
{
private static int checkCount = 1;
[CustomAction]
public static ActionResult CheckCredentials(Session session)
{

With the same error in the log file. It seems more related to the assembly than 
the scope of the method. The error indicates that the DLL "could not be run". I 
don't think the process has even gotten to the point of looking for the member. 
Something is wrong with the DLL that is produced by the custom action project 
that is integrated with Visual Studio.
I think the issue that the .msi is compiled and built (and the CA project) in a 
32 bit environment and the .msi is installing to a 64-bit environment may be 
more of the problem. Although I am not sure how to tackle it if this is indeed 
the problem. So the  element that makes the DLL part of the .msi maybe 
needs to know about the "bited-ness: of the source and target. All of this is 
just supposition as I am a relative beginner with WiX.


-Original Message-
From: Michael Osmond [mailto:mosm...@baytech.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:08 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

Hi Kevin

I think your error that it can't find the CA is in the call


private static bool CheckCredentials


Should be something like:

   [CustomAction]
public static ActionResult CheckCredentials(Session session)

The class it is a member of also needs to be public.

Note you need to get the credentials out of properties.

Michael


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
Sent: Friday, 11 March 2011 8:41 AM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

I hear you. Where I work there is already considerable skepticism on the 
installation package and anything that goes wrong is blamed on the installation 
so when the installation locks the account (because of bad credentials) there 
is a call to not use any deployment and go to copy deployment because of 
similar "mysteries". If I can avoid the account lockout with a CA that would 
sweep the problem under the rug at least for now.

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Painter [mailto:chr...@deploymentengineering.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 4:24 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

When I was at Continental Airlines we had an application that I had to 
distribute where the service used a service account.  For reasons never 
determined ( aka damn service account )  something out there would periodically 
lock the account and group policy would have it unlocked 10 minutes later.

One of the worst dependencies I ever had to take.  It wasn't fun.

---
Christopher Painter, Author of Deployment Engineering Blog Have a hot tip, know 
a secret or read a really good thread that deserves attention? E-Mail Me



- Original Message 
From: "Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro)" 
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.

Sent: Thu, March 10, 2011 4:11:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

Phil and I both mentioned the potential problem. Run your code for invalid 
credentials more than once. Try it about 4-12 times (as suggested by Phil). The 
flow for the custom action is the following:

User enters credentials in dialog.
Dialog asks custom action to validate.
Dialog checks validation result property letting the user know if the password 
was valid or invalid.

Suppose that a user incorrect enters invalid credentials enough times... At my 
work you only get 3 tries! On the third validation the account is locked out 
and the fourth and future attempts all fail regardless of whether the 
credentials were valid or not.

Running it once is not enough to verify that this is not the case.

Now, to address the CA running to begin with... Check that the CA is getting 
compiled with the correct bitness as required by the target platform. In other 
words, are you compiling a 64-bit CA and trying to call it on a 32-bit machine 
or vice versa?

If you can post a minimal reproduction (wix source, CA source, etc) of the CA 
running problem I can try to reproduce it on my end.

Edwin G. Castro
Software Developer - Staff
Electronic Banking Services
Fiserv
Office: 503-746-0643
Fax: 503-617-029

Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Kevin Burton
Thank you Michael,

I tried

public class CustomActions
{
private static int checkCount = 1;
[CustomAction]
public static ActionResult CheckCredentials(Session session)
{

With the same error in the log file. It seems more related to the assembly than 
the scope of the method. The error indicates that the DLL "could not be run". I 
don't think the process has even gotten to the point of looking for the member. 
Something is wrong with the DLL that is produced by the custom action project 
that is integrated with Visual Studio.
I think the issue that the .msi is compiled and built (and the CA project) in a 
32 bit environment and the .msi is installing to a 64-bit environment may be 
more of the problem. Although I am not sure how to tackle it if this is indeed 
the problem. So the  element that makes the DLL part of the .msi maybe 
needs to know about the "bited-ness: of the source and target. All of this is 
just supposition as I am a relative beginner with WiX.


-Original Message-
From: Michael Osmond [mailto:mosm...@baytech.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:08 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

Hi Kevin

I think your error that it can't find the CA is in the call


private static bool CheckCredentials


Should be something like:

   [CustomAction]
public static ActionResult CheckCredentials(Session session)

The class it is a member of also needs to be public.

Note you need to get the credentials out of properties.

Michael


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
Sent: Friday, 11 March 2011 8:41 AM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

I hear you. Where I work there is already considerable skepticism on the 
installation package and anything that goes wrong is blamed on the installation 
so when the installation locks the account (because of bad credentials) there 
is a call to not use any deployment and go to copy deployment because of 
similar "mysteries". If I can avoid the account lockout with a CA that would 
sweep the problem under the rug at least for now.

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Painter [mailto:chr...@deploymentengineering.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 4:24 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

When I was at Continental Airlines we had an application that I had to 
distribute where the service used a service account.  For reasons never 
determined ( aka damn service account )  something out there would periodically 
lock the account and group policy would have it unlocked 10 minutes later.

One of the worst dependencies I ever had to take.  It wasn't fun.

---
Christopher Painter, Author of Deployment Engineering Blog Have a hot tip, know 
a secret or read a really good thread that deserves attention? E-Mail Me



- Original Message 
From: "Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro)" 
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.

Sent: Thu, March 10, 2011 4:11:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

Phil and I both mentioned the potential problem. Run your code for invalid 
credentials more than once. Try it about 4-12 times (as suggested by Phil). The 
flow for the custom action is the following:

User enters credentials in dialog.
Dialog asks custom action to validate.
Dialog checks validation result property letting the user know if the password 
was valid or invalid.

Suppose that a user incorrect enters invalid credentials enough times... At my 
work you only get 3 tries! On the third validation the account is locked out 
and the fourth and future attempts all fail regardless of whether the 
credentials were valid or not.

Running it once is not enough to verify that this is not the case.

Now, to address the CA running to begin with... Check that the CA is getting 
compiled with the correct bitness as required by the target platform. In other 
words, are you compiling a 64-bit CA and trying to call it on a 32-bit machine 
or vice versa?

If you can post a minimal reproduction (wix source, CA source, etc) of the CA 
running problem I can try to reproduce it on my end.

Edwin G. Castro
Software Developer - Staff
Electronic Banking Services
Fiserv
Office: 503-746-0643
Fax: 503-617-0291
www.fiserv.com
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail


> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:51 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> I can check the credentials with invalid credentials and then I am
> able to check the credential

Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Michael Osmond
Hi Kevin

I think your error that it can't find the CA is in the call


private static bool CheckCredentials


Should be something like:

   [CustomAction]
public static ActionResult CheckCredentials(Session session)

The class it is a member of also needs to be public.

Note you need to get the credentials out of properties.

Michael


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
Sent: Friday, 11 March 2011 8:41 AM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

I hear you. Where I work there is already considerable skepticism on the 
installation package and anything that goes wrong is blamed on the installation 
so when the installation locks the account (because of bad credentials) there 
is a call to not use any deployment and go to copy deployment because of 
similar "mysteries". If I can avoid the account lockout with a CA that would 
sweep the problem under the rug at least for now.

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Painter [mailto:chr...@deploymentengineering.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 4:24 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

When I was at Continental Airlines we had an application that I had to 
distribute where the service used a service account.  For reasons never 
determined ( aka damn service account )  something out there would periodically 
lock the account and group policy would have it unlocked 10 minutes later.

One of the worst dependencies I ever had to take.  It wasn't fun.

---
Christopher Painter, Author of Deployment Engineering Blog Have a hot tip, know 
a secret or read a really good thread that deserves attention? E-Mail Me



- Original Message 
From: "Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro)" 
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.

Sent: Thu, March 10, 2011 4:11:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

Phil and I both mentioned the potential problem. Run your code for invalid
credentials more than once. Try it about 4-12 times (as suggested by Phil). The
flow for the custom action is the following:

User enters credentials in dialog.
Dialog asks custom action to validate.
Dialog checks validation result property letting the user know if the password
was valid or invalid.

Suppose that a user incorrect enters invalid credentials enough times... At my
work you only get 3 tries! On the third validation the account is locked out and
the fourth and future attempts all fail regardless of whether the credentials
were valid or not.

Running it once is not enough to verify that this is not the case.

Now, to address the CA running to begin with... Check that the CA is getting
compiled with the correct bitness as required by the target platform. In other
words, are you compiling a 64-bit CA and trying to call it on a 32-bit machine
or vice versa?

If you can post a minimal reproduction (wix source, CA source, etc) of the CA
running problem I can try to reproduce it on my end.

Edwin G. Castro
Software Developer - Staff
Electronic Banking Services
Fiserv
Office: 503-746-0643
Fax: 503-617-0291
www.fiserv.com
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail


> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:51 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> I can check the credentials with invalid credentials and then I am able to
> check the credentials using valid credentials. No lock out. Here is the code:
>
>private static bool CheckCredentials(string userName, string password)
>{
>bool valid = false;
>using(PrincipalContext context = new
> PrincipalContext(ContextType.Domain, "ASGARD"))
>{
>valid = context.ValidateCredentials(userName, password);
>}
>return valid;
>}
>static void Main(string[] args)
>{
>Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("Credentials are {0}",
> CheckCredentials("user", "invalid")));
>Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("Credentials are {0}",
> CheckCredentials("user", "valid")));
>}
>
>  And the output is:
>
> Credentials are False
> Credentials are True
>
> Now my biggest problem is that the CA is not getting called.
> Kevin Burton
> Senior Software Engineer
> BUYSEASONS
> 262-901-2000 Office
> 262-901-2312 Fax
> kev...@buyseasons.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wilson, Phil [mailto:phil.wil...@invensys.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 3:10 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> This is nothing to do with exceptions. I'm telling you

Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Kevin Burton
I hear you. Where I work there is already considerable skepticism on the 
installation package and anything that goes wrong is blamed on the installation 
so when the installation locks the account (because of bad credentials) there 
is a call to not use any deployment and go to copy deployment because of 
similar "mysteries". If I can avoid the account lockout with a CA that would 
sweep the problem under the rug at least for now.

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Painter [mailto:chr...@deploymentengineering.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 4:24 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

When I was at Continental Airlines we had an application that I had to 
distribute where the service used a service account.  For reasons never 
determined ( aka damn service account )  something out there would periodically 
lock the account and group policy would have it unlocked 10 minutes later.

One of the worst dependencies I ever had to take.  It wasn't fun.

---
Christopher Painter, Author of Deployment Engineering Blog Have a hot tip, know 
a secret or read a really good thread that deserves attention? E-Mail Me



- Original Message 
From: "Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro)" 
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.

Sent: Thu, March 10, 2011 4:11:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

Phil and I both mentioned the potential problem. Run your code for invalid
credentials more than once. Try it about 4-12 times (as suggested by Phil). The
flow for the custom action is the following:

User enters credentials in dialog.
Dialog asks custom action to validate.
Dialog checks validation result property letting the user know if the password
was valid or invalid.

Suppose that a user incorrect enters invalid credentials enough times... At my
work you only get 3 tries! On the third validation the account is locked out and
the fourth and future attempts all fail regardless of whether the credentials
were valid or not.

Running it once is not enough to verify that this is not the case.

Now, to address the CA running to begin with... Check that the CA is getting
compiled with the correct bitness as required by the target platform. In other
words, are you compiling a 64-bit CA and trying to call it on a 32-bit machine
or vice versa?

If you can post a minimal reproduction (wix source, CA source, etc) of the CA
running problem I can try to reproduce it on my end.

Edwin G. Castro
Software Developer - Staff
Electronic Banking Services
Fiserv
Office: 503-746-0643
Fax: 503-617-0291
www.fiserv.com
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail


> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:51 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> I can check the credentials with invalid credentials and then I am able to
> check the credentials using valid credentials. No lock out. Here is the code:
>
>private static bool CheckCredentials(string userName, string password)
>{
>bool valid = false;
>using(PrincipalContext context = new
> PrincipalContext(ContextType.Domain, "ASGARD"))
>{
>valid = context.ValidateCredentials(userName, password);
>}
>return valid;
>}
>static void Main(string[] args)
>{
>Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("Credentials are {0}",
> CheckCredentials("user", "invalid")));
>Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("Credentials are {0}",
> CheckCredentials("user", "valid")));
>}
>
>  And the output is:
>
> Credentials are False
> Credentials are True
>
> Now my biggest problem is that the CA is not getting called.
> Kevin Burton
> Senior Software Engineer
> BUYSEASONS
> 262-901-2000 Office
> 262-901-2312 Fax
> kev...@buyseasons.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wilson, Phil [mailto:phil.wil...@invensys.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 3:10 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> This is nothing to do with exceptions. I'm telling you that the act of
>verifying
> credentials is a flavor of logon, and that a failure to "verify" may be 
> treated
>in
> exactly the same way as when your service tries to log on with invalid
> credentials. In other words you can write a bunch of code that tries to verify
> an account and the result is that the account gets locked out, or you can just
> go back to what you were doing before and have the service logon failure
> cause account lockout. I'm saying that this is what you may end up with, so
all
> your code gives you very little advantage, if any at all.
>
> You should

Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Christopher Painter
When I was at Continental Airlines we had an application that I had to 
distribute where the service used a service account.  For reasons never 
determined ( aka damn service account )  something out there would periodically 
lock the account and group policy would have it unlocked 10 minutes later.

One of the worst dependencies I ever had to take.  It wasn't fun.
 
---
Christopher Painter, Author of Deployment Engineering Blog
Have a hot tip, know a secret or read a really good thread that deserves 
attention? E-Mail Me



- Original Message 
From: "Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro)" 
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. 

Sent: Thu, March 10, 2011 4:11:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

Phil and I both mentioned the potential problem. Run your code for invalid 
credentials more than once. Try it about 4-12 times (as suggested by Phil). The 
flow for the custom action is the following:

User enters credentials in dialog.
Dialog asks custom action to validate.
Dialog checks validation result property letting the user know if the password 
was valid or invalid.

Suppose that a user incorrect enters invalid credentials enough times... At my 
work you only get 3 tries! On the third validation the account is locked out 
and 
the fourth and future attempts all fail regardless of whether the credentials 
were valid or not.

Running it once is not enough to verify that this is not the case.

Now, to address the CA running to begin with... Check that the CA is getting 
compiled with the correct bitness as required by the target platform. In other 
words, are you compiling a 64-bit CA and trying to call it on a 32-bit machine 
or vice versa?

If you can post a minimal reproduction (wix source, CA source, etc) of the CA 
running problem I can try to reproduce it on my end.

Edwin G. Castro
Software Developer - Staff
Electronic Banking Services
Fiserv
Office: 503-746-0643
Fax: 503-617-0291
www.fiserv.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail


> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:51 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> I can check the credentials with invalid credentials and then I am able to
> check the credentials using valid credentials. No lock out. Here is the code:
>
>        private static bool CheckCredentials(string userName, string password)
>        {
>            bool valid = false;
>            using(PrincipalContext context = new
> PrincipalContext(ContextType.Domain, "ASGARD"))
>            {
>                valid = context.ValidateCredentials(userName, password);
>            }
>            return valid;
>        }
>        static void Main(string[] args)
>        {
>            Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("Credentials are {0}",
> CheckCredentials("user", "invalid")));
>            Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("Credentials are {0}",
> CheckCredentials("user", "valid")));
>        }
>
>  And the output is:
>
> Credentials are False
> Credentials are True
>
> Now my biggest problem is that the CA is not getting called.
> Kevin Burton
> Senior Software Engineer
> BUYSEASONS
> 262-901-2000 Office
> 262-901-2312 Fax
> kev...@buyseasons.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wilson, Phil [mailto:phil.wil...@invensys.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 3:10 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> This is nothing to do with exceptions. I'm telling you that the act of 
>verifying
> credentials is a flavor of logon, and that a failure to "verify" may be 
> treated 
>in
> exactly the same way as when your service tries to log on with invalid
> credentials. In other words you can write a bunch of code that tries to verify
> an account and the result is that the account gets locked out, or you can just
> go back to what you were doing before and have the service logon failure
> cause account lockout. I'm saying that this is what you may end up with, so 
all
> your code gives you very little advantage, if any at all.
>
> You should run your custom action in a program and use an invalid password.
> Try it a dozen times and see if the account gets locked out.
>
> Phil Wilson
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:27 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> I am not sure what you mean by "square one"? Are you saying that the
> checking of credentials that are invalid will throw an exception that is not
> caught?
>
> First I have to solve the problem that I don't think the CA is being called as
> evidenced by the snippet of log I posted earlier. Unless the log entry will be
> suppressed by an exception. But the entry on the log indicates

Re: [WiX-users] Uninstall Previous Inno Setup Installed App

2011-03-10 Thread Sean Farrow
Hi: 
On a 32-bit version of windows, your key would look like:
"SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{413B7644-1F93-4890-BD40-AC540C29935B}_is1"
I don't tend to use SilentUninstallString in these situations as this stil 
shows user interface--at least the cancel button if I remember correctly and it 
may even give the user the option to uninstall! I'd rather use 
"QuietUninstallString" as this shows nothing.
To get these two custom actions to work you need to search the registry based 
on a condition--I'd use VERSIONNT64/VERSIONNT.
Then have two custom actions in your InstallExecute sequence, one that executes 
if your running 32-bit windows and the other if your running 64-bit.
Looking at the old code I ran the uninstall just before InstallFiles.

If you need any further help let me know but hopefully this should be enough to 
get you going!
Cheers
Sean.

-Original Message-
From: Jammer [mailto:jam...@jammer.biz] 
Sent: 10 March 2011 20:43
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [WiX-users] Uninstall Previous Inno Setup Installed App

Hi All,

I've just rewritten my installer using WiX 3.5.  However, before I 
distribute the new MSI I'm dotting all the i and crossing the t's this 
time!  The problem is that I need to make sure the previous .exe setup 
is removed before installing the new msi version.

So, i've been looking at various ways to locate the unins000.exe file 
(UninstallString) and execute it.  If possible I'd like to search the 
registry and use the info in there but I can't think of a way to use the 
 element and be sure it's found, if there.

When I look at my dev machine registry the key would look like this:

"SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{413B7644-1F93-4890-BD40-AC540C29935B}_is1"

How would this work on a 32bit XP machine for instance?  What key value 
can I possibly use to catch all flavours of OS?  I've seen the Win64 
property but I can only find my keys in one place on my dev machine so 
if I said no to this it wouldn't find it on my dev box ... confused!

All the script I have for this at the moment is:












Any pointers on this would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Jammer

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users


Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Kevin Burton
The CA is compile on a 32 bit machine and installed on a 64 bit machine. Is 
that a problem? Will not WoW take care of that? It does for the other 
assemblies.

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com


-Original Message-
From: Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro) [mailto:edwin.cas...@fiserv.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 4:11 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

Phil and I both mentioned the potential problem. Run your code for invalid 
credentials more than once. Try it about 4-12 times (as suggested by Phil). The 
flow for the custom action is the following:

User enters credentials in dialog.
Dialog asks custom action to validate.
Dialog checks validation result property letting the user know if the password 
was valid or invalid.

Suppose that a user incorrect enters invalid credentials enough times... At my 
work you only get 3 tries! On the third validation the account is locked out 
and the fourth and future attempts all fail regardless of whether the 
credentials were valid or not.

Running it once is not enough to verify that this is not the case.

Now, to address the CA running to begin with... Check that the CA is getting 
compiled with the correct bitness as required by the target platform. In other 
words, are you compiling a 64-bit CA and trying to call it on a 32-bit machine 
or vice versa?

If you can post a minimal reproduction (wix source, CA source, etc) of the CA 
running problem I can try to reproduce it on my end.

Edwin G. Castro
Software Developer - Staff
Electronic Banking Services
Fiserv
Office: 503-746-0643
Fax: 503-617-0291
www.fiserv.com
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail


> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:51 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> I can check the credentials with invalid credentials and then I am
> able to check the credentials using valid credentials. No lock out. Here is 
> the code:
>
> private static bool CheckCredentials(string userName, string password)
> {
> bool valid = false;
> using(PrincipalContext context = new
> PrincipalContext(ContextType.Domain, "ASGARD"))
> {
> valid = context.ValidateCredentials(userName, password);
> }
> return valid;
> }
> static void Main(string[] args)
> {
> Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("Credentials are {0}",
> CheckCredentials("user", "invalid")));
> Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("Credentials are {0}",
> CheckCredentials("user", "valid")));
> }
>
>  And the output is:
>
> Credentials are False
> Credentials are True
>
> Now my biggest problem is that the CA is not getting called.
> Kevin Burton
> Senior Software Engineer
> BUYSEASONS
> 262-901-2000 Office
> 262-901-2312 Fax
> kev...@buyseasons.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wilson, Phil [mailto:phil.wil...@invensys.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 3:10 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> This is nothing to do with exceptions. I'm telling you that the act of
> verifying credentials is a flavor of logon, and that a failure to
> "verify" may be treated in exactly the same way as when your service
> tries to log on with invalid credentials. In other words you can write
> a bunch of code that tries to verify an account and the result is that
> the account gets locked out, or you can just go back to what you were
> doing before and have the service logon failure cause account lockout.
> I'm saying that this is what you may end up with, so all your code gives you 
> very little advantage, if any at all.
>
> You should run your custom action in a program and use an invalid password.
> Try it a dozen times and see if the account gets locked out.
>
> Phil Wilson
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:27 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> I am not sure what you mean by "square one"? Are you saying that the
> checking of credentials that are invalid will throw an exception that
> is not caught?
>
> First I have to solve the problem that I don't think the CA is being
> called as evidenced by the snippet of log I posted earlier. Unless the
> log entry will be suppressed by an exception. But the entry on the log
> indicates that the DLL could not be run so I don't think I am even
> getting to that point. Also I get the same error (DLL could not be
> run) whether I supply the correct credentials or incorrect ones.
>
> Kevin Burton
> Senio

Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Kevin Burton
The same is true here running the validation with invalid credentials 3 or more 
times locks the account out. So the user will not get that many tries I will 
fail the installation after the first invalid entry. But this is to avoid the 
situation where installing and starting the service just once causes the 
account to be locked out if invalid credentials are entered.

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com


-Original Message-
From: Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro) [mailto:edwin.cas...@fiserv.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 4:11 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

Phil and I both mentioned the potential problem. Run your code for invalid 
credentials more than once. Try it about 4-12 times (as suggested by Phil). The 
flow for the custom action is the following:

User enters credentials in dialog.
Dialog asks custom action to validate.
Dialog checks validation result property letting the user know if the password 
was valid or invalid.

Suppose that a user incorrect enters invalid credentials enough times... At my 
work you only get 3 tries! On the third validation the account is locked out 
and the fourth and future attempts all fail regardless of whether the 
credentials were valid or not.

Running it once is not enough to verify that this is not the case.

Now, to address the CA running to begin with... Check that the CA is getting 
compiled with the correct bitness as required by the target platform. In other 
words, are you compiling a 64-bit CA and trying to call it on a 32-bit machine 
or vice versa?

If you can post a minimal reproduction (wix source, CA source, etc) of the CA 
running problem I can try to reproduce it on my end.

Edwin G. Castro
Software Developer - Staff
Electronic Banking Services
Fiserv
Office: 503-746-0643
Fax: 503-617-0291
www.fiserv.com
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail


> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:51 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> I can check the credentials with invalid credentials and then I am
> able to check the credentials using valid credentials. No lock out. Here is 
> the code:
>
> private static bool CheckCredentials(string userName, string password)
> {
> bool valid = false;
> using(PrincipalContext context = new
> PrincipalContext(ContextType.Domain, "ASGARD"))
> {
> valid = context.ValidateCredentials(userName, password);
> }
> return valid;
> }
> static void Main(string[] args)
> {
> Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("Credentials are {0}",
> CheckCredentials("user", "invalid")));
> Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("Credentials are {0}",
> CheckCredentials("user", "valid")));
> }
>
>  And the output is:
>
> Credentials are False
> Credentials are True
>
> Now my biggest problem is that the CA is not getting called.
> Kevin Burton
> Senior Software Engineer
> BUYSEASONS
> 262-901-2000 Office
> 262-901-2312 Fax
> kev...@buyseasons.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wilson, Phil [mailto:phil.wil...@invensys.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 3:10 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> This is nothing to do with exceptions. I'm telling you that the act of
> verifying credentials is a flavor of logon, and that a failure to
> "verify" may be treated in exactly the same way as when your service
> tries to log on with invalid credentials. In other words you can write
> a bunch of code that tries to verify an account and the result is that
> the account gets locked out, or you can just go back to what you were
> doing before and have the service logon failure cause account lockout.
> I'm saying that this is what you may end up with, so all your code gives you 
> very little advantage, if any at all.
>
> You should run your custom action in a program and use an invalid password.
> Try it a dozen times and see if the account gets locked out.
>
> Phil Wilson
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:27 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> I am not sure what you mean by "square one"? Are you saying that the
> checking of credentials that are invalid will throw an exception that
> is not caught?
>
> First I have to solve the problem that I don't think the CA is being
> called as evidenced by the snippet of log I posted earlier. Unless the
> log entry will be suppressed by an exception. But the entry on the log
> indicates that

Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro)
Phil and I both mentioned the potential problem. Run your code for invalid 
credentials more than once. Try it about 4-12 times (as suggested by Phil). The 
flow for the custom action is the following:

User enters credentials in dialog.
Dialog asks custom action to validate.
Dialog checks validation result property letting the user know if the password 
was valid or invalid.

Suppose that a user incorrect enters invalid credentials enough times... At my 
work you only get 3 tries! On the third validation the account is locked out 
and the fourth and future attempts all fail regardless of whether the 
credentials were valid or not.

Running it once is not enough to verify that this is not the case.

Now, to address the CA running to begin with... Check that the CA is getting 
compiled with the correct bitness as required by the target platform. In other 
words, are you compiling a 64-bit CA and trying to call it on a 32-bit machine 
or vice versa?

If you can post a minimal reproduction (wix source, CA source, etc) of the CA 
running problem I can try to reproduce it on my end.

Edwin G. Castro
Software Developer - Staff
Electronic Banking Services
Fiserv
Office: 503-746-0643
Fax: 503-617-0291
www.fiserv.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail


> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:51 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> I can check the credentials with invalid credentials and then I am able to
> check the credentials using valid credentials. No lock out. Here is the code:
>
> private static bool CheckCredentials(string userName, string password)
> {
> bool valid = false;
> using(PrincipalContext context = new
> PrincipalContext(ContextType.Domain, "ASGARD"))
> {
> valid = context.ValidateCredentials(userName, password);
> }
> return valid;
> }
> static void Main(string[] args)
> {
> Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("Credentials are {0}",
> CheckCredentials("user", "invalid")));
> Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("Credentials are {0}",
> CheckCredentials("user", "valid")));
> }
>
>  And the output is:
>
> Credentials are False
> Credentials are True
>
> Now my biggest problem is that the CA is not getting called.
> Kevin Burton
> Senior Software Engineer
> BUYSEASONS
> 262-901-2000 Office
> 262-901-2312 Fax
> kev...@buyseasons.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wilson, Phil [mailto:phil.wil...@invensys.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 3:10 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> This is nothing to do with exceptions. I'm telling you that the act of 
> verifying
> credentials is a flavor of logon, and that a failure to "verify" may be 
> treated in
> exactly the same way as when your service tries to log on with invalid
> credentials. In other words you can write a bunch of code that tries to verify
> an account and the result is that the account gets locked out, or you can just
> go back to what you were doing before and have the service logon failure
> cause account lockout. I'm saying that this is what you may end up with, so 
> all
> your code gives you very little advantage, if any at all.
>
> You should run your custom action in a program and use an invalid password.
> Try it a dozen times and see if the account gets locked out.
>
> Phil Wilson
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:27 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> I am not sure what you mean by "square one"? Are you saying that the
> checking of credentials that are invalid will throw an exception that is not
> caught?
>
> First I have to solve the problem that I don't think the CA is being called as
> evidenced by the snippet of log I posted earlier. Unless the log entry will be
> suppressed by an exception. But the entry on the log indicates that the DLL
> could not be run so I don't think I am even getting to that point. Also I get 
> the
> same error (DLL could not be run) whether I supply the correct credentials or
> incorrect ones.
>
> Kevin Burton
> Senior Software Engineer
> BUYSEASONS
> 262-901-2000 Office
> 262-901-2312 Fax
> kev...@buyseasons.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wilson, Phil [mailto:phil.wil...@invensys.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:55 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
>  and Kevin, are you sure that attempting to validate will not be 
> treated
> as a logon failure and put you back to square one? User account validation
> sc

Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Kevin Burton
I can check the credentials with invalid credentials and then I am able to 
check the credentials using valid credentials. No lock out. Here is the code:

private static bool CheckCredentials(string userName, string password)
{
bool valid = false;
using(PrincipalContext context = new 
PrincipalContext(ContextType.Domain, "ASGARD"))
{
valid = context.ValidateCredentials(userName, password);
}
return valid;
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("Credentials are {0}", 
CheckCredentials("user", "invalid")));
Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("Credentials are {0}", 
CheckCredentials("user", "valid")));
}

 And the output is:

Credentials are False
Credentials are True

Now my biggest problem is that the CA is not getting called.
Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com


-Original Message-
From: Wilson, Phil [mailto:phil.wil...@invensys.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 3:10 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

This is nothing to do with exceptions. I'm telling you that the act of 
verifying credentials is a flavor of logon, and that a failure to "verify" may 
be treated in exactly the same way as when your service tries to log on with 
invalid credentials. In other words you can write a bunch of code that tries to 
verify an account and the result is that the account gets locked out, or you 
can just go back to what you were doing before and have the service logon 
failure cause account lockout. I'm saying that this is what you may end up 
with, so all your code gives you very little advantage, if any at all.

You should run your custom action in a program and use an invalid password. Try 
it a dozen times and see if the account gets locked out.

Phil Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:27 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

I am not sure what you mean by "square one"? Are you saying that the checking 
of credentials that are invalid will throw an exception that is not caught?

First I have to solve the problem that I don't think the CA is being called as 
evidenced by the snippet of log I posted earlier. Unless the log entry will be 
suppressed by an exception. But the entry on the log indicates that the DLL 
could not be run so I don't think I am even getting to that point. Also I get 
the same error (DLL could not be run) whether I supply the correct credentials 
or incorrect ones.

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com


-Original Message-
From: Wilson, Phil [mailto:phil.wil...@invensys.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:55 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

 and Kevin, are you sure that attempting to validate will not be 
treated as a logon failure and put you back to square one? User account 
validation schemes are often nothing more than an attempt to log on with the 
supplied credentials. That might be what .ValidateCredentials does - I 
don't know enough about AD and AdsOpenObject() to know if that's what happens. 
Reflector seems to indicate that's the underlying Win32 call.

Phil Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Skildum, Mathew [mailto:mathew.skil...@aspect.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 10:49 AM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

This is where you use the property that the action set.  You do not allow the 
user off of the dialog until they enter credentials that work and the property 
is set to the value you expect.  This way it is up to the installer to exit the 
install if they do not have the needed information, but you give them all the 
chances they need to get it right.

Mat Skildum


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:38 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

But I want the install to fail. If it continues with the wrong credentials it 
will try to start services with the wrong credentials.

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com


-Original Message-
From: Skildum, Mathew [mailto:mathew.skil...@aspect.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:32 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

In cases where you checking things like credentials you want the actions to 
retur

Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Wilson, Phil
This is nothing to do with exceptions. I'm telling you that the act of 
verifying credentials is a flavor of logon, and that a failure to "verify" may 
be treated in exactly the same way as when your service tries to log on with 
invalid credentials. In other words you can write a bunch of code that tries to 
verify an account and the result is that the account gets locked out, or you 
can just go back to what you were doing before and have the service logon 
failure cause account lockout. I'm saying that this is what you may end up 
with, so all your code gives you very little advantage, if any at all.

You should run your custom action in a program and use an invalid password. Try 
it a dozen times and see if the account gets locked out.

Phil Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:27 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

I am not sure what you mean by "square one"? Are you saying that the checking 
of credentials that are invalid will throw an exception that is not caught?

First I have to solve the problem that I don't think the CA is being called as 
evidenced by the snippet of log I posted earlier. Unless the log entry will be 
suppressed by an exception. But the entry on the log indicates that the DLL 
could not be run so I don't think I am even getting to that point. Also I get 
the same error (DLL could not be run) whether I supply the correct credentials 
or incorrect ones.

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com


-Original Message-
From: Wilson, Phil [mailto:phil.wil...@invensys.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:55 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

 and Kevin, are you sure that attempting to validate will not be 
treated as a logon failure and put you back to square one? User account 
validation schemes are often nothing more than an attempt to log on with the 
supplied credentials. That might be what .ValidateCredentials does - I 
don't know enough about AD and AdsOpenObject() to know if that's what happens. 
Reflector seems to indicate that's the underlying Win32 call.

Phil Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Skildum, Mathew [mailto:mathew.skil...@aspect.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 10:49 AM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

This is where you use the property that the action set.  You do not allow the 
user off of the dialog until they enter credentials that work and the property 
is set to the value you expect.  This way it is up to the installer to exit the 
install if they do not have the needed information, but you give them all the 
chances they need to get it right.

Mat Skildum


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:38 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

But I want the install to fail. If it continues with the wrong credentials it 
will try to start services with the wrong credentials.

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com


-Original Message-
From: Skildum, Mathew [mailto:mathew.skil...@aspect.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:32 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

In cases where you checking things like credentials you want the actions to 
return success so that the install does not fail.  As it was said, you set a 
property if the call succeeded and check if the property is set.

You use the other return values in those cases where you want the install to 
fail and not continue such as when updating configuration files or updating 
anything that the application requires to function.

The basic rule of thumb is when in the UI sequence always have actions return 
success and set properties use in conditional statements.  When the action is 
called in the Execute sequence and it is critical to the success of the product 
always have the action return success or failure so that the install can fail 
and rollback when needed.

Mat Skildum


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:21 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

So CA's always return Success. What are the other return values used for? Thank 
you. For the tip.

The problem that I am having now is that it doesn't appear that the CA is 
getting called. I look in the log and see the message indicated earlier in this 
thread indicating that the DLL "could not be run". Any i

Re: [WiX-users] Votive and Visual Studio Question

2011-03-10 Thread Christopher Painter
 A short follow up.  I had assumed this wouldn't work due to past knowledge of 
the Visual Studio Express AddOn debate.  However a PM from Microsoft emailed me 
and it prompted me to just try it out on a VM.

I grabed the TFC install ( which uses the VS 2008 Shell in Integrated Mode )  
and sure enough WiX installed into it without any issues.  Well, one issue, but 
that's to be expected.   The WiX Custom Action project types ( C++, C#, VB.Net 
) 

aren't available because those languages aren't available.   My own tool IsWiX 
( 

CodePlex ) also registered with VS without any issues.

Really cool stuff.  These three tools together make a pretty interesting IDE 
for 

authoring installers.  What can I say, I love MSBuild and Votive.

Chris


- Original Message 
From: Christopher Painter 
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. 

Sent: Wed, March 9, 2011 10:42:30 AM
Subject: Votive and Visual Studio Question

I've been doing a lot of work with collaboration and TFS lately and I've been 
wondering something.   Team Foundation Server Client ( aka TFC aka Team 
Explorer 


) has an installer that gives you a stock Visual Studio IDE / Shell and 
installs 


the Team Explorer AddIn.   This allows  non-developer personas to access the 
Team System ( work items / source control / builds / reports and so on )

Is it possible to piggy back off of this and use WiX / Votive?  I ask because 
in 


my collaboration / setup democratization excercises I sometimes come across 
contributors who are not developers.   These tend to be content producers, tech 
writers, and so on.  I want to try to leverage the Votive story with these 
people also.
     

---
Christopher Painter, Author of Deployment Engineering Blog
Have a hot tip, know a secret or read a really good thread that deserves 
attention? E-Mail Me


  

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users


[WiX-users] Uninstall Previous Inno Setup Installed App

2011-03-10 Thread Jammer
Hi All,

I've just rewritten my installer using WiX 3.5.  However, before I 
distribute the new MSI I'm dotting all the i and crossing the t's this 
time!  The problem is that I need to make sure the previous .exe setup 
is removed before installing the new msi version.

So, i've been looking at various ways to locate the unins000.exe file 
(UninstallString) and execute it.  If possible I'd like to search the 
registry and use the info in there but I can't think of a way to use the 
 element and be sure it's found, if there.

When I look at my dev machine registry the key would look like this:

"SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{413B7644-1F93-4890-BD40-AC540C29935B}_is1"

How would this work on a 32bit XP machine for instance?  What key value 
can I possibly use to catch all flavours of OS?  I've seen the Win64 
property but I can only find my keys in one place on my dev machine so 
if I said no to this it wouldn't find it on my dev box ... confused!

All the script I have for this at the moment is:












Any pointers on this would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Jammer

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users


Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Kevin Burton
I am not sure what you mean by "square one"? Are you saying that the checking 
of credentials that are invalid will throw an exception that is not caught?

First I have to solve the problem that I don't think the CA is being called as 
evidenced by the snippet of log I posted earlier. Unless the log entry will be 
suppressed by an exception. But the entry on the log indicates that the DLL 
could not be run so I don't think I am even getting to that point. Also I get 
the same error (DLL could not be run) whether I supply the correct credentials 
or incorrect ones.

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com


-Original Message-
From: Wilson, Phil [mailto:phil.wil...@invensys.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:55 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

 and Kevin, are you sure that attempting to validate will not be 
treated as a logon failure and put you back to square one? User account 
validation schemes are often nothing more than an attempt to log on with the 
supplied credentials. That might be what .ValidateCredentials does - I 
don't know enough about AD and AdsOpenObject() to know if that's what happens. 
Reflector seems to indicate that's the underlying Win32 call.

Phil Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Skildum, Mathew [mailto:mathew.skil...@aspect.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 10:49 AM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

This is where you use the property that the action set.  You do not allow the 
user off of the dialog until they enter credentials that work and the property 
is set to the value you expect.  This way it is up to the installer to exit the 
install if they do not have the needed information, but you give them all the 
chances they need to get it right.

Mat Skildum


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:38 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

But I want the install to fail. If it continues with the wrong credentials it 
will try to start services with the wrong credentials.

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com


-Original Message-
From: Skildum, Mathew [mailto:mathew.skil...@aspect.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:32 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

In cases where you checking things like credentials you want the actions to 
return success so that the install does not fail.  As it was said, you set a 
property if the call succeeded and check if the property is set.

You use the other return values in those cases where you want the install to 
fail and not continue such as when updating configuration files or updating 
anything that the application requires to function.

The basic rule of thumb is when in the UI sequence always have actions return 
success and set properties use in conditional statements.  When the action is 
called in the Execute sequence and it is critical to the success of the product 
always have the action return success or failure so that the install can fail 
and rollback when needed.

Mat Skildum


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:21 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

So CA's always return Success. What are the other return values used for? Thank 
you. For the tip.

The problem that I am having now is that it doesn't appear that the CA is 
getting called. I look in the log and see the message indicated earlier in this 
thread indicating that the DLL "could not be run". Any idea for this?

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com

-Original Message-
From: Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro) [mailto:edwin.cas...@fiserv.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:03 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

You'll want to set a property that can be checked in a condition.

Edwin G. Castro
Software Developer - Staff
Electronic Banking Services
Fiserv
Office: 503-746-0643
Fax: 503-617-0291
www.fiserv.com
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 6:05 AM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> How does the custom action indicate that the credentials are incorrect?
>
> Kevin Burton
> Senior Software Engineer
> BUY

Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Wilson, Phil
 and Kevin, are you sure that attempting to validate will not be 
treated as a logon failure and put you back to square one? User account 
validation schemes are often nothing more than an attempt to log on with the 
supplied credentials. That might be what .ValidateCredentials does - I 
don't know enough about AD and AdsOpenObject() to know if that's what happens. 
Reflector seems to indicate that's the underlying Win32 call.

Phil Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Skildum, Mathew [mailto:mathew.skil...@aspect.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 10:49 AM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

This is where you use the property that the action set.  You do not allow the 
user off of the dialog until they enter credentials that work and the property 
is set to the value you expect.  This way it is up to the installer to exit the 
install if they do not have the needed information, but you give them all the 
chances they need to get it right.

Mat Skildum


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:38 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

But I want the install to fail. If it continues with the wrong credentials it 
will try to start services with the wrong credentials.

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com


-Original Message-
From: Skildum, Mathew [mailto:mathew.skil...@aspect.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:32 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

In cases where you checking things like credentials you want the actions to 
return success so that the install does not fail.  As it was said, you set a 
property if the call succeeded and check if the property is set.

You use the other return values in those cases where you want the install to 
fail and not continue such as when updating configuration files or updating 
anything that the application requires to function.

The basic rule of thumb is when in the UI sequence always have actions return 
success and set properties use in conditional statements.  When the action is 
called in the Execute sequence and it is critical to the success of the product 
always have the action return success or failure so that the install can fail 
and rollback when needed.

Mat Skildum


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:21 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

So CA's always return Success. What are the other return values used for? Thank 
you. For the tip.

The problem that I am having now is that it doesn't appear that the CA is 
getting called. I look in the log and see the message indicated earlier in this 
thread indicating that the DLL "could not be run". Any idea for this?

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com

-Original Message-
From: Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro) [mailto:edwin.cas...@fiserv.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:03 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

You'll want to set a property that can be checked in a condition.

Edwin G. Castro
Software Developer - Staff
Electronic Banking Services
Fiserv
Office: 503-746-0643
Fax: 503-617-0291
www.fiserv.com
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 6:05 AM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> How does the custom action indicate that the credentials are incorrect?
>
> Kevin Burton
> Senior Software Engineer
> BUYSEASONS
> 262-901-2000 Office
> 262-901-2312 Fax
> kev...@buyseasons.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Dahlbacka [mailto:simon.dahlba...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11:21 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> You shouldn't return failure if the credentials are incorrect, if you
> do so you will get this error.
>
> "been there, done that... "
> On Mar 10, 2011 6:34 AM, "Kevin Burton"  wrote:
> > I read that. Which of the four rules is this violating?
> >
> > I made the warning go away by making the C# CA 'immediate' thus I
> > don't
> have to have another custom action to remember the property. So I have
> >
> >  > Return="check"
> > Execute="immediate"
> > BinaryKey="CustomActionsDLL"
> > DllEntry="CheckCredentials"/>
> >
> > And the schedule
> >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> > But in the verbos

Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Skildum, Mathew
This is where you use the property that the action set.  You do not allow the 
user off of the dialog until they enter credentials that work and the property 
is set to the value you expect.  This way it is up to the installer to exit the 
install if they do not have the needed information, but you give them all the 
chances they need to get it right.

Mat Skildum


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:38 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

But I want the install to fail. If it continues with the wrong credentials it 
will try to start services with the wrong credentials.

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com


-Original Message-
From: Skildum, Mathew [mailto:mathew.skil...@aspect.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:32 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

In cases where you checking things like credentials you want the actions to 
return success so that the install does not fail.  As it was said, you set a 
property if the call succeeded and check if the property is set.

You use the other return values in those cases where you want the install to 
fail and not continue such as when updating configuration files or updating 
anything that the application requires to function.

The basic rule of thumb is when in the UI sequence always have actions return 
success and set properties use in conditional statements.  When the action is 
called in the Execute sequence and it is critical to the success of the product 
always have the action return success or failure so that the install can fail 
and rollback when needed.

Mat Skildum


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:21 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

So CA's always return Success. What are the other return values used for? Thank 
you. For the tip.

The problem that I am having now is that it doesn't appear that the CA is 
getting called. I look in the log and see the message indicated earlier in this 
thread indicating that the DLL "could not be run". Any idea for this?

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com

-Original Message-
From: Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro) [mailto:edwin.cas...@fiserv.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:03 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

You'll want to set a property that can be checked in a condition.

Edwin G. Castro
Software Developer - Staff
Electronic Banking Services
Fiserv
Office: 503-746-0643
Fax: 503-617-0291
www.fiserv.com
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 6:05 AM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> How does the custom action indicate that the credentials are incorrect?
>
> Kevin Burton
> Senior Software Engineer
> BUYSEASONS
> 262-901-2000 Office
> 262-901-2312 Fax
> kev...@buyseasons.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Dahlbacka [mailto:simon.dahlba...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11:21 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> You shouldn't return failure if the credentials are incorrect, if you
> do so you will get this error.
>
> "been there, done that... "
> On Mar 10, 2011 6:34 AM, "Kevin Burton"  wrote:
> > I read that. Which of the four rules is this violating?
> >
> > I made the warning go away by making the C# CA 'immediate' thus I
> > don't
> have to have another custom action to remember the property. So I have
> >
> >  > Return="check"
> > Execute="immediate"
> > BinaryKey="CustomActionsDLL"
> > DllEntry="CheckCredentials"/>
> >
> > And the schedule
> >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> > But in the verbose log I get:
> >
> > MSI (s) (B8:9C) [22:04:26:415]: Note: 1: 1723 2: CA_CheckCredentials 3:
> CheckCredentials 4: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
> > Action start 22:04:26: CA_CheckCredentials.
> > MSI (s) (B8:9C) [22:04:26:415]: Product: Bsi WebServices -- Error 1723.
> There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A DLL required
> for this install to complete could not be run. Contact your support
> personnel or package vendor. Action CA_CheckCredentials, entry:
> CheckCredentials,
> library: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
> >
> > Error 1723. There is a problem with this Windows Installer package.
> > A DLL
> required for this install to complete could not be run. Co

Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Kevin Burton
But I want the install to fail. If it continues with the wrong credentials it 
will try to start services with the wrong credentials.

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com


-Original Message-
From: Skildum, Mathew [mailto:mathew.skil...@aspect.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:32 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

In cases where you checking things like credentials you want the actions to 
return success so that the install does not fail.  As it was said, you set a 
property if the call succeeded and check if the property is set.

You use the other return values in those cases where you want the install to 
fail and not continue such as when updating configuration files or updating 
anything that the application requires to function.

The basic rule of thumb is when in the UI sequence always have actions return 
success and set properties use in conditional statements.  When the action is 
called in the Execute sequence and it is critical to the success of the product 
always have the action return success or failure so that the install can fail 
and rollback when needed.

Mat Skildum


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:21 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

So CA's always return Success. What are the other return values used for? Thank 
you. For the tip.

The problem that I am having now is that it doesn't appear that the CA is 
getting called. I look in the log and see the message indicated earlier in this 
thread indicating that the DLL "could not be run". Any idea for this?

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com

-Original Message-
From: Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro) [mailto:edwin.cas...@fiserv.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:03 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

You'll want to set a property that can be checked in a condition.

Edwin G. Castro
Software Developer - Staff
Electronic Banking Services
Fiserv
Office: 503-746-0643
Fax: 503-617-0291
www.fiserv.com
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 6:05 AM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> How does the custom action indicate that the credentials are incorrect?
>
> Kevin Burton
> Senior Software Engineer
> BUYSEASONS
> 262-901-2000 Office
> 262-901-2312 Fax
> kev...@buyseasons.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Dahlbacka [mailto:simon.dahlba...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11:21 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> You shouldn't return failure if the credentials are incorrect, if you
> do so you will get this error.
>
> "been there, done that... "
> On Mar 10, 2011 6:34 AM, "Kevin Burton"  wrote:
> > I read that. Which of the four rules is this violating?
> >
> > I made the warning go away by making the C# CA 'immediate' thus I
> > don't
> have to have another custom action to remember the property. So I have
> >
> >  > Return="check"
> > Execute="immediate"
> > BinaryKey="CustomActionsDLL"
> > DllEntry="CheckCredentials"/>
> >
> > And the schedule
> >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> > But in the verbose log I get:
> >
> > MSI (s) (B8:9C) [22:04:26:415]: Note: 1: 1723 2: CA_CheckCredentials 3:
> CheckCredentials 4: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
> > Action start 22:04:26: CA_CheckCredentials.
> > MSI (s) (B8:9C) [22:04:26:415]: Product: Bsi WebServices -- Error 1723.
> There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A DLL required
> for this install to complete could not be run. Contact your support
> personnel or package vendor. Action CA_CheckCredentials, entry:
> CheckCredentials,
> library: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
> >
> > Error 1723. There is a problem with this Windows Installer package.
> > A DLL
> required for this install to complete could not be run. Contact your
> support personnel or package vendor. Action CA_CheckCredentials, entry:
> CheckCredentials, library: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
> >
> > The error says that the DLL cannot be run. Why? I believe I have
> > followed
> the instructions for writing a managed CA to the tee (though there
> seems to be some disagreement between the online tutorial
> http://www.tramontana.co.hu/wix/ and this book).
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro) [mailto:edwin.cas...@fiserv.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 5:26 PM
> > To: General discussion for

Re: [WiX-users] Adding registry entries for other users or non-existant users

2011-03-10 Thread Wilson, Phil
This should work if you have the entries created with default values in HKCU 
where the component keypath is the registry item. This is mentioned in the 
Registry Table MSDN docs where it talks about HKCU and "the installer writes 
the necessary entries when there are multiple users on the same computer". The 
repair mechanism is what causes the registry entries to be written for every 
user because it's a keypath item that's missing. You'd also need to have a 
triggering mechanism like a non-advertised shortcut to cause the repair, and 
repairs percolate up from component to feature, so it might take some 
re-arranging of your components/features. 

Phil Wilson 

-Original Message-
From: John Daintree [mailto:jo...@dyalog.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 7:40 AM
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [WiX-users] Adding registry entries for other users or non-existant 
users

Hi all,

 

When our installation installs for ALLUSERS we put registry entries into
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, and when the application starts on each user account we
copy the settings from there to HKEY_CURRENT_USER. This is handy because it
will work for all existing users on the machine, as well as for user
accounts that do not exist yet. 

However, we also install a keyboard layout which needs keys in
HKEY_CURRENT_USER as the user logs in, before the user can access the
layout, and before our application can be run. Is there some way we can
create registry entries for all existing users on the system AND any new
users?

 

Thanks,

John.

 

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users


*** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or attached 
files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed. This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. 
If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please 
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from 
your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its 
contents to any other person. This email comes from a division of the Invensys 
Group, owned by Invensys plc, which is a company registered in England and 
Wales with its registered office at 3rd Floor, 40 Grosvenor Place, London, SW1X 
7AW (Registered number 166023). For a list of European legal entities within 
the Invensys Group, please go to 
http://www.invensys.com/legal/default.asp?top_nav_id=77&nav_id=80&prev_id=77.

You may contact Invensys plc on +44 (0)20 3155 1200 or e-mail 
recept...@invensys.com. This e-mail and any attachments thereto may be subject 
to the terms of any agreements between Invensys (and/or its subsidiaries and 
affiliates) and the recipient (and/or its subsidiaries and affiliates).



--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users


Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Skildum, Mathew
In cases where you checking things like credentials you want the actions to 
return success so that the install does not fail.  As it was said, you set a 
property if the call succeeded and check if the property is set.

You use the other return values in those cases where you want the install to 
fail and not continue such as when updating configuration files or updating 
anything that the application requires to function.

The basic rule of thumb is when in the UI sequence always have actions return 
success and set properties use in conditional statements.  When the action is 
called in the Execute sequence and it is critical to the success of the product 
always have the action return success or failure so that the install can fail 
and rollback when needed.

Mat Skildum


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:21 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

So CA's always return Success. What are the other return values used for? Thank 
you. For the tip.

The problem that I am having now is that it doesn't appear that the CA is 
getting called. I look in the log and see the message indicated earlier in this 
thread indicating that the DLL "could not be run". Any idea for this?

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com

-Original Message-
From: Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro) [mailto:edwin.cas...@fiserv.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:03 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

You'll want to set a property that can be checked in a condition.

Edwin G. Castro
Software Developer - Staff
Electronic Banking Services
Fiserv
Office: 503-746-0643
Fax: 503-617-0291
www.fiserv.com
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 6:05 AM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> How does the custom action indicate that the credentials are incorrect?
>
> Kevin Burton
> Senior Software Engineer
> BUYSEASONS
> 262-901-2000 Office
> 262-901-2312 Fax
> kev...@buyseasons.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Dahlbacka [mailto:simon.dahlba...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11:21 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> You shouldn't return failure if the credentials are incorrect, if you
> do so you will get this error.
>
> "been there, done that... "
> On Mar 10, 2011 6:34 AM, "Kevin Burton"  wrote:
> > I read that. Which of the four rules is this violating?
> >
> > I made the warning go away by making the C# CA 'immediate' thus I
> > don't
> have to have another custom action to remember the property. So I have
> >
> >  > Return="check"
> > Execute="immediate"
> > BinaryKey="CustomActionsDLL"
> > DllEntry="CheckCredentials"/>
> >
> > And the schedule
> >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> > But in the verbose log I get:
> >
> > MSI (s) (B8:9C) [22:04:26:415]: Note: 1: 1723 2: CA_CheckCredentials 3:
> CheckCredentials 4: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
> > Action start 22:04:26: CA_CheckCredentials.
> > MSI (s) (B8:9C) [22:04:26:415]: Product: Bsi WebServices -- Error 1723.
> There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A DLL required
> for this install to complete could not be run. Contact your support
> personnel or package vendor. Action CA_CheckCredentials, entry:
> CheckCredentials,
> library: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
> >
> > Error 1723. There is a problem with this Windows Installer package.
> > A DLL
> required for this install to complete could not be run. Contact your
> support personnel or package vendor. Action CA_CheckCredentials, entry:
> CheckCredentials, library: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
> >
> > The error says that the DLL cannot be run. Why? I believe I have
> > followed
> the instructions for writing a managed CA to the tee (though there
> seems to be some disagreement between the online tutorial
> http://www.tramontana.co.hu/wix/ and this book).
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro) [mailto:edwin.cas...@fiserv.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 5:26 PM
> > To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> > Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
> >
> > ICE63 - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa369008.aspx
> >
> > Edwin G. Castro
> > Software Developer - Staff
> > Electronic Banking Services
> > Fiserv
> > Office: 503-746-0643
> > Fax: 503-617-0291
> > www.fiserv.com
> > P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.co

Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Kevin Burton
So CA's always return Success. What are the other return values used for? Thank 
you. For the tip.

The problem that I am having now is that it doesn't appear that the CA is 
getting called. I look in the log and see the message indicated earlier in this 
thread indicating that the DLL "could not be run". Any idea for this?

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com 

-Original Message-
From: Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro) [mailto:edwin.cas...@fiserv.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:03 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

You'll want to set a property that can be checked in a condition.

Edwin G. Castro
Software Developer - Staff
Electronic Banking Services
Fiserv
Office: 503-746-0643
Fax: 503-617-0291
www.fiserv.com
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 6:05 AM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
> 
> How does the custom action indicate that the credentials are incorrect?
> 
> Kevin Burton
> Senior Software Engineer
> BUYSEASONS
> 262-901-2000 Office
> 262-901-2312 Fax
> kev...@buyseasons.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Dahlbacka [mailto:simon.dahlba...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11:21 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
> 
> You shouldn't return failure if the credentials are incorrect, if you 
> do so you will get this error.
> 
> "been there, done that... "
> On Mar 10, 2011 6:34 AM, "Kevin Burton"  wrote:
> > I read that. Which of the four rules is this violating?
> >
> > I made the warning go away by making the C# CA 'immediate' thus I 
> > don't
> have to have another custom action to remember the property. So I have
> >
> >  > Return="check"
> > Execute="immediate"
> > BinaryKey="CustomActionsDLL"
> > DllEntry="CheckCredentials"/>
> >
> > And the schedule
> >
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >
> > But in the verbose log I get:
> >
> > MSI (s) (B8:9C) [22:04:26:415]: Note: 1: 1723 2: CA_CheckCredentials 3:
> CheckCredentials 4: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
> > Action start 22:04:26: CA_CheckCredentials.
> > MSI (s) (B8:9C) [22:04:26:415]: Product: Bsi WebServices -- Error 1723.
> There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A DLL required 
> for this install to complete could not be run. Contact your support 
> personnel or package vendor. Action CA_CheckCredentials, entry: 
> CheckCredentials,
> library: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
> >
> > Error 1723. There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. 
> > A DLL
> required for this install to complete could not be run. Contact your 
> support personnel or package vendor. Action CA_CheckCredentials, entry:
> CheckCredentials, library: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
> >
> > The error says that the DLL cannot be run. Why? I believe I have 
> > followed
> the instructions for writing a managed CA to the tee (though there 
> seems to be some disagreement between the online tutorial 
> http://www.tramontana.co.hu/wix/ and this book).
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro) [mailto:edwin.cas...@fiserv.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 5:26 PM
> > To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> > Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
> >
> > ICE63 - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa369008.aspx
> >
> > Edwin G. Castro
> > Software Developer - Staff
> > Electronic Banking Services
> > Fiserv
> > Office: 503-746-0643
> > Fax: 503-617-0291
> > www.fiserv.com
> > P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 2:15 PM
> >> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> >> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
> >>
> >> I think I have solved this problem. The CA was scheduled in the 
> >> InstallExecuteSequence and was marked as 'deferred' so I created 
> >> the following 'Custom Data'.
> >>
> >>  >> Value="[SERVICEUSER],[SERVICEPASSWORD]" />  >> Id="CA_CheckCredentials"
> >> Return="check"
> >> Execute="deferred"
> >> BinaryKey="CustomActionsDLL"
> >> DllEntry="CheckCredentials"/>
> >>
> >> And scheduled it like (I am trying to follow the instructions on 
> >> page
> >> 133 of
> >> 'WiX: A Developer's Guide to Windows Installer XML' by Nick 
> >> Ramirez)
> >>
> >> 
> >> 
>  >> Action="CA_CheckCredentials" After="InstallInitialize" /> 
> >> 
> >>
> >> Now I get the ICE warning:
> >>
> >> warning LGHT1076: ICE63: Some action falls between 
> >> InstallInitialize and RemoveExistingProducts.
> >>
> >> Is this a "bad" warning? 

Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro)
You'll want to set a property that can be checked in a condition.

Edwin G. Castro
Software Developer - Staff
Electronic Banking Services
Fiserv
Office: 503-746-0643
Fax: 503-617-0291
www.fiserv.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 6:05 AM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
> 
> How does the custom action indicate that the credentials are incorrect?
> 
> Kevin Burton
> Senior Software Engineer
> BUYSEASONS
> 262-901-2000 Office
> 262-901-2312 Fax
> kev...@buyseasons.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Dahlbacka [mailto:simon.dahlba...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11:21 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
> 
> You shouldn't return failure if the credentials are incorrect, if you do so 
> you
> will get this error.
> 
> "been there, done that... "
> On Mar 10, 2011 6:34 AM, "Kevin Burton"  wrote:
> > I read that. Which of the four rules is this violating?
> >
> > I made the warning go away by making the C# CA 'immediate' thus I
> > don't
> have to have another custom action to remember the property. So I have
> >
> >  > Return="check"
> > Execute="immediate"
> > BinaryKey="CustomActionsDLL"
> > DllEntry="CheckCredentials"/>
> >
> > And the schedule
> >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> > But in the verbose log I get:
> >
> > MSI (s) (B8:9C) [22:04:26:415]: Note: 1: 1723 2: CA_CheckCredentials 3:
> CheckCredentials 4: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
> > Action start 22:04:26: CA_CheckCredentials.
> > MSI (s) (B8:9C) [22:04:26:415]: Product: Bsi WebServices -- Error 1723.
> There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A DLL required for
> this install to complete could not be run. Contact your support personnel or
> package vendor. Action CA_CheckCredentials, entry: CheckCredentials,
> library: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
> >
> > Error 1723. There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A
> > DLL
> required for this install to complete could not be run. Contact your support
> personnel or package vendor. Action CA_CheckCredentials, entry:
> CheckCredentials, library: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
> >
> > The error says that the DLL cannot be run. Why? I believe I have
> > followed
> the instructions for writing a managed CA to the tee (though there seems to
> be some disagreement between the online tutorial
> http://www.tramontana.co.hu/wix/ and this book).
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro) [mailto:edwin.cas...@fiserv.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 5:26 PM
> > To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> > Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
> >
> > ICE63 - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa369008.aspx
> >
> > Edwin G. Castro
> > Software Developer - Staff
> > Electronic Banking Services
> > Fiserv
> > Office: 503-746-0643
> > Fax: 503-617-0291
> > www.fiserv.com
> > P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 2:15 PM
> >> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> >> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
> >>
> >> I think I have solved this problem. The CA was scheduled in the
> >> InstallExecuteSequence and was marked as 'deferred' so I created the
> >> following 'Custom Data'.
> >>
> >>  >> Value="[SERVICEUSER],[SERVICEPASSWORD]" />  >> Id="CA_CheckCredentials"
> >> Return="check"
> >> Execute="deferred"
> >> BinaryKey="CustomActionsDLL"
> >> DllEntry="CheckCredentials"/>
> >>
> >> And scheduled it like (I am trying to follow the instructions on page
> >> 133 of
> >> 'WiX: A Developer's Guide to Windows Installer XML' by Nick Ramirez)
> >>
> >> 
> >> 
>  >> Action="CA_CheckCredentials" After="InstallInitialize" />
> >> 
> >>
> >> Now I get the ICE warning:
> >>
> >> warning LGHT1076: ICE63: Some action falls between InstallInitialize
> >> and RemoveExistingProducts.
> >>
> >> Is this a "bad" warning? I don't completely understand why this
> >> scheduling is bad. I would like to know that the credentials are bad
> >> *before* the existing products are removed.
> >>
> >> If I look at the .msi generated with Orca I see that in the
> >> InstallExecuteSequence table
> >>
> >> InstallInitialize 1500
> >> SetProperty 1501
> >> CA_CheckCredentials 1502
> >> RemoveExistingProducts 1503
> >>
> >> This seems like a valid sequence to me but I am obviously missing
> >> something as the warning is there for a purpose.
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Christopher Painter [mailto:chr...@deploymentengineering.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 3:30 PM
> >> To: General discussion for Windows I

[WiX-users] Heat - harvesting COM registry entries for components with dependencies

2011-03-10 Thread Hoover, Jacob
  Does anyone have a fix or workaround for registering COM components
that are dependent upon other type libraries being registered?  Due to
the way heat is harvesting (via registry redirection) the changes, the
other components will not be available. About the only thing I can think
of is to add an option to heat to add a list of dependent modules as a
parameter to heat.  Then in the code we would need to preload all those
dependents, load our file to harvest, register the dependents and our
harvest file, and then unregister our dependents.  This should result in
a close to pure image of what our module changed (assuming the dependent
modules do clean up everything they add).

 

Thoughts?

 

Jacob

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users


[WiX-users] Adding registry entries for other users or non-existant users

2011-03-10 Thread John Daintree
Hi all,

 

When our installation installs for ALLUSERS we put registry entries into
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, and when the application starts on each user account we
copy the settings from there to HKEY_CURRENT_USER. This is handy because it
will work for all existing users on the machine, as well as for user
accounts that do not exist yet. 

However, we also install a keyboard layout which needs keys in
HKEY_CURRENT_USER as the user logs in, before the user can access the
layout, and before our application can be run. Is there some way we can
create registry entries for all existing users on the system AND any new
users?

 

Thanks,

John.

 

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users


Re: [WiX-users] INSTALLLOCATION wrong value during uninstall (has the default value, not the used one)

2011-03-10 Thread MeCoco
And yes, just to be clear, once I added a component under the INSTALLDIR 
(not one of it's alias) the INSTALLDIR was also correctly preserved for 
uninstall.

Thx,
MeCoco

On 3/10/2011 10:39 AM, MeCoco wrote:
> Thank you guys for all your help!
>
> MeCoco
>
> On 3/9/2011 4:19 PM, David Watson wrote:
>> If you have a directory element with no @Name it just makes the @Id an alias
>> of the containing element.
>>
>> So your code makes any files targeted to MyApp.Binaries go in the same
>> location as INSTALLDIR.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: MeCoco [mailto:vcotirl...@hotmail.com]
>> Sent: 09 March 2011 15:03
>> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
>> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] INSTALLLOCATION wrong value during uninstall (has
>> the default value, not the used one)
>>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> Thanks again for the explanation.
>>
>> Could you also tell me please what are the following lines of code
>> actually do?:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>> Thanks!
>> MeCoco
>>
>> On 3/9/2011 3:08 PM, Michael Urman wrote:
>>> That doesn't look like it creates a component whose Directory is
>>> INSTALLDIR. It may put the component's file in the same directory, but
>>> since custom actions could override this, it doesn't count. What you
>>> need is the Directory_ column of the Component table to say INSTALLDIR
>>> instead of MyApp.Binaries, for at least one installed component.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 02:29, MeCocowrote:
 Hi Michael,

 Thanks for your answer.

 Is the following code not enough to preserve the INSTALLDIR directory?

 
 
 
 
 

 
 >>> Guid="MY-GUID">
 
 
 

 As the file MyApp.app.config ends up going into the INSTALLLOCATION
 directory?


 I am not even sure what the:
 
 
 
 
 

 is doing as the:

 

 doesn't have any Name parameter, so it looks like redefining
 MyApp.Binaries to be the INSTALLDIR value. Am I assuming correct?


 Thanks,
 MeCoco

 On 3/8/2011 3:07 PM, Michael Urman wrote:
> Directories are only automatically preserved when there is a component
> that installs to it. So make sure at least one component installs to
> INSTALLDIR.
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 03:31, MeCoco  wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I tried to create a small sample to reproduce the problem I'm having,
>> and after a lot of tries I managed to reproduce it. The problem is
>> described extensivly in my previous email, but a summary would be: if
>> the user, when installing, changes the default directory (eg: from
>> C:\Program Files\... to Z:\Program Files\...), then on uninstall (only
>> real uninstall, not updates) one can see in the verbose log file that
>> the INSTALLDIR property is set wrong to the default value (eg:
>> C:\Program Files\...) and not to the folder where the user really
>> installed the product (eg: Z:\Program Files\...)
>>
>> HOW to reproduce the problem:
>>
>> 1) If in the code I have the following:
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>> 
>>
>> 
>> > />
>> 
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>>
>> 
>> > Level="1" Absent="disallow">
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>> I get everything correct, meaning I have in the log file the following:
>> MSI (s) (08:24) [10:13:46:801]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Adding INSTALLDIR
>> property. Its value is 'Z:\Program Files\MyTestInstallDirectory'.
>> MSI (s) (08:24) [10:13:46:801]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Adding Modules
>> property. Its value is 'Z:\Program
>> Files\MyTestInstallDirectory\Modules'.
>> 2) BUT, if in the code the MyDoc.txt component is missing, the
>> INSTALLDIR property is wrong. So, for the code:
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>> 
>>
>> 
>> > />
>> 
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>>
>> 
>> > Level="1" Absent="disallow">
>> 
>> 
>>
>> In the log file I can see:
>> MSI (s) (08:B0) [10:16:49:444]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Adding INSTALLDIR
>> property. Its value is 'C:\Program Files\MyTestInstallDirectory\'.
>> MSI (s) (08:B0) [10:16:49:444]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Modifying Modules
>> property. Its current value is 'Z:\Program
>> Files\MyTestInstallDirectory\Modules'. Its new value: 'Z:\Program
>> Files\MyTestInstallDirectory\Modules\'.
>>
>>
>> Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong? I think in both cases the
>> INSTALLDIR should have the correct value (Z:\Program Files\...) on
>> uninstall.
>> Any tip is appreciated.
>> Thank you,
>> MeCoco
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/7/2011 7:24 PM, MeCoco wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have a very extensive installer, written by somebody that left our
>>> company, and I have to add a custom action that should be executed at
>>> th

Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Kevin Burton
This error occurs when the credentials are correct. I don't get the message 
that the CA is being called (the first line in the code) so I don't think the 
CA is even being called.

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com 


-Original Message-
From: Simon Dahlbacka [mailto:simon.dahlba...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11:21 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

You shouldn't return failure if the credentials are incorrect, if you do so you 
will get this error.

"been there, done that... "
On Mar 10, 2011 6:34 AM, "Kevin Burton"  wrote:
> I read that. Which of the four rules is this violating?
>
> I made the warning go away by making the C# CA 'immediate' thus I 
> don't
have to have another custom action to remember the property. So I have
>
>  Return="check"
> Execute="immediate"
> BinaryKey="CustomActionsDLL"
> DllEntry="CheckCredentials"/>
>
> And the schedule
>
> 
>  
> 
>
> But in the verbose log I get:
>
> MSI (s) (B8:9C) [22:04:26:415]: Note: 1: 1723 2: CA_CheckCredentials 3:
CheckCredentials 4: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
> Action start 22:04:26: CA_CheckCredentials.
> MSI (s) (B8:9C) [22:04:26:415]: Product: Bsi WebServices -- Error 1723.
There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A DLL required for this 
install to complete could not be run. Contact your support personnel or package 
vendor. Action CA_CheckCredentials, entry: CheckCredentials,
library: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
>
> Error 1723. There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A 
> DLL
required for this install to complete could not be run. Contact your support 
personnel or package vendor. Action CA_CheckCredentials, entry:
CheckCredentials, library: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
>
> The error says that the DLL cannot be run. Why? I believe I have 
> followed
the instructions for writing a managed CA to the tee (though there seems to be 
some disagreement between the online tutorial http://www.tramontana.co.hu/wix/ 
and this book).
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro) [mailto:edwin.cas...@fiserv.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 5:26 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> ICE63 - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa369008.aspx
>
> Edwin G. Castro
> Software Developer - Staff
> Electronic Banking Services
> Fiserv
> Office: 503-746-0643
> Fax: 503-617-0291
> www.fiserv.com
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 2:15 PM
>> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
>> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>>
>> I think I have solved this problem. The CA was scheduled in the 
>> InstallExecuteSequence and was marked as 'deferred' so I created the 
>> following 'Custom Data'.
>>
>> > Value="[SERVICEUSER],[SERVICEPASSWORD]" /> > Id="CA_CheckCredentials"
>> Return="check"
>> Execute="deferred"
>> BinaryKey="CustomActionsDLL"
>> DllEntry="CheckCredentials"/>
>>
>> And scheduled it like (I am trying to follow the instructions on page
>> 133 of
>> 'WiX: A Developer's Guide to Windows Installer XML' by Nick Ramirez)
>>
>> 
>>  > Action="CA_CheckCredentials" After="InstallInitialize" /> 
>> 
>>
>> Now I get the ICE warning:
>>
>> warning LGHT1076: ICE63: Some action falls between InstallInitialize 
>> and RemoveExistingProducts.
>>
>> Is this a "bad" warning? I don't completely understand why this 
>> scheduling is bad. I would like to know that the credentials are bad
>> *before* the existing products are removed.
>>
>> If I look at the .msi generated with Orca I see that in the 
>> InstallExecuteSequence table
>>
>> InstallInitialize 1500
>> SetProperty 1501
>> CA_CheckCredentials 1502
>> RemoveExistingProducts 1503
>>
>> This seems like a valid sequence to me but I am obviously missing 
>> something as the warning is there for a purpose.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Christopher Painter [mailto:chr...@deploymentengineering.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 3:30 PM
>> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
>> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>>
>> If I had to guess you calling this CA as a ControlEvent off a Dialog 
>> / Control in your UI sequence.  Am I correct?  If so, it's a known issue
>> that Msi lacks the ability to process messages in this scenario.   The
>> workaround is to set a dummy property to see a "PROPERTY CHANGED"
>> message in the log file where the value is the data you are trying to
log.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> ---
>> Christopher Painter, Author of Deployment Engineering Blog Have a hot 
>> tip, know a secret or read a really good thread that deserves 
>> attention? E-Mail Me
>>

Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

2011-03-10 Thread Kevin Burton
How does the custom action indicate that the credentials are incorrect?

Kevin Burton
Senior Software Engineer
BUYSEASONS
262-901-2000 Office
262-901-2312 Fax
kev...@buyseasons.com 

-Original Message-
From: Simon Dahlbacka [mailto:simon.dahlba...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11:21 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions

You shouldn't return failure if the credentials are incorrect, if you do so you 
will get this error.

"been there, done that... "
On Mar 10, 2011 6:34 AM, "Kevin Burton"  wrote:
> I read that. Which of the four rules is this violating?
>
> I made the warning go away by making the C# CA 'immediate' thus I 
> don't
have to have another custom action to remember the property. So I have
>
>  Return="check"
> Execute="immediate"
> BinaryKey="CustomActionsDLL"
> DllEntry="CheckCredentials"/>
>
> And the schedule
>
> 
>  
> 
>
> But in the verbose log I get:
>
> MSI (s) (B8:9C) [22:04:26:415]: Note: 1: 1723 2: CA_CheckCredentials 3:
CheckCredentials 4: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
> Action start 22:04:26: CA_CheckCredentials.
> MSI (s) (B8:9C) [22:04:26:415]: Product: Bsi WebServices -- Error 1723.
There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A DLL required for this 
install to complete could not be run. Contact your support personnel or package 
vendor. Action CA_CheckCredentials, entry: CheckCredentials,
library: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
>
> Error 1723. There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A 
> DLL
required for this install to complete could not be run. Contact your support 
personnel or package vendor. Action CA_CheckCredentials, entry:
CheckCredentials, library: D:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSI410.tmp
>
> The error says that the DLL cannot be run. Why? I believe I have 
> followed
the instructions for writing a managed CA to the tee (though there seems to be 
some disagreement between the online tutorial http://www.tramontana.co.hu/wix/ 
and this book).
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Castro, Edwin G. (Hillsboro) [mailto:edwin.cas...@fiserv.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 5:26 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>
> ICE63 - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa369008.aspx
>
> Edwin G. Castro
> Software Developer - Staff
> Electronic Banking Services
> Fiserv
> Office: 503-746-0643
> Fax: 503-617-0291
> www.fiserv.com
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kevin Burton [mailto:kev...@buyseasons.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 2:15 PM
>> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
>> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>>
>> I think I have solved this problem. The CA was scheduled in the 
>> InstallExecuteSequence and was marked as 'deferred' so I created the 
>> following 'Custom Data'.
>>
>> > Value="[SERVICEUSER],[SERVICEPASSWORD]" /> > Id="CA_CheckCredentials"
>> Return="check"
>> Execute="deferred"
>> BinaryKey="CustomActionsDLL"
>> DllEntry="CheckCredentials"/>
>>
>> And scheduled it like (I am trying to follow the instructions on page
>> 133 of
>> 'WiX: A Developer's Guide to Windows Installer XML' by Nick Ramirez)
>>
>> 
>>  > Action="CA_CheckCredentials" After="InstallInitialize" /> 
>> 
>>
>> Now I get the ICE warning:
>>
>> warning LGHT1076: ICE63: Some action falls between InstallInitialize 
>> and RemoveExistingProducts.
>>
>> Is this a "bad" warning? I don't completely understand why this 
>> scheduling is bad. I would like to know that the credentials are bad
>> *before* the existing products are removed.
>>
>> If I look at the .msi generated with Orca I see that in the 
>> InstallExecuteSequence table
>>
>> InstallInitialize 1500
>> SetProperty 1501
>> CA_CheckCredentials 1502
>> RemoveExistingProducts 1503
>>
>> This seems like a valid sequence to me but I am obviously missing 
>> something as the warning is there for a purpose.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Christopher Painter [mailto:chr...@deploymentengineering.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 3:30 PM
>> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
>> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] C# Custom Action questions
>>
>> If I had to guess you calling this CA as a ControlEvent off a Dialog 
>> / Control in your UI sequence.  Am I correct?  If so, it's a known issue
>> that Msi lacks the ability to process messages in this scenario.   The
>> workaround is to set a dummy property to see a "PROPERTY CHANGED"
>> message in the log file where the value is the data you are trying to
log.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> ---
>> Christopher Painter, Author of Deployment Engineering Blog Have a hot 
>> tip, know a secret or read a really good thread that deserves 
>> attention? E-Mail Me
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message 
>> From: Kevin Burton 
>> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XM

Re: [WiX-users] Patching Merge module

2011-03-10 Thread Peter Shirtcliffe
You patch the MSI, not the merge module, so you need to use the Component Ids
as they appear in the MSI.
Open your release MSI in something like Orca or InstEd and you can look up
the component Ids as they appear after merging. Include those in your
patch.wxs. 

-Original Message-
From: Arun Kumar [mailto:arun_jku...@persistent.co.in] 
Sent: 10 March 2011 09:20
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: [WiX-users] Patching Merge module

Hi All,

I am building WIX MSI that has integrated Merge Module.
Now I am creating patches for this MSI.
I know that I can specify ComponentRef's in my patch.wxs file but is there
any way to provide patch for the integrated Merge Module?

Thank You all in advance.
Regards,
AK.


DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the
property of Persistent Systems Ltd. It is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, distribute or
use this message. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. Persistent Systems
Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected mails.
-
-
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users
SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved.
If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires 
that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we 
further request that you advise us.
SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales.  
Registered number: 02675207.
Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, 
UK.


--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users


Re: [WiX-users] INSTALLLOCATION wrong value during uninstall (has the default value, not the used one)

2011-03-10 Thread MeCoco
Thank you guys for all your help!

MeCoco

On 3/9/2011 4:19 PM, David Watson wrote:
> If you have a directory element with no @Name it just makes the @Id an alias
> of the containing element.
>
> So your code makes any files targeted to MyApp.Binaries go in the same
> location as INSTALLDIR.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: MeCoco [mailto:vcotirl...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: 09 March 2011 15:03
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] INSTALLLOCATION wrong value during uninstall (has
> the default value, not the used one)
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Thanks again for the explanation.
>
> Could you also tell me please what are the following lines of code
> actually do?:
> 
> 
> 
>
> Thanks!
> MeCoco
>
> On 3/9/2011 3:08 PM, Michael Urman wrote:
>> That doesn't look like it creates a component whose Directory is
>> INSTALLDIR. It may put the component's file in the same directory, but
>> since custom actions could override this, it doesn't count. What you
>> need is the Directory_ column of the Component table to say INSTALLDIR
>> instead of MyApp.Binaries, for at least one installed component.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 02:29, MeCoco   wrote:
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your answer.
>>>
>>> Is the following code not enough to preserve the INSTALLDIR directory?
>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> 
>>> >> Guid="MY-GUID">
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> As the file MyApp.app.config ends up going into the INSTALLLOCATION
>>> directory?
>>>
>>>
>>> I am not even sure what the:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> is doing as the:
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> doesn't have any Name parameter, so it looks like redefining
>>> MyApp.Binaries to be the INSTALLDIR value. Am I assuming correct?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> MeCoco
>>>
>>> On 3/8/2011 3:07 PM, Michael Urman wrote:
 Directories are only automatically preserved when there is a component
 that installs to it. So make sure at least one component installs to
 INSTALLDIR.

 On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 03:31, MeCoco wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I tried to create a small sample to reproduce the problem I'm having,
> and after a lot of tries I managed to reproduce it. The problem is
> described extensivly in my previous email, but a summary would be: if
> the user, when installing, changes the default directory (eg: from
> C:\Program Files\... to Z:\Program Files\...), then on uninstall (only
> real uninstall, not updates) one can see in the verbose log file that
> the INSTALLDIR property is set wrong to the default value (eg:
> C:\Program Files\...) and not to the folder where the user really
> installed the product (eg: Z:\Program Files\...)
>
> HOW to reproduce the problem:
>
> 1) If in the code I have the following:
>
> 
> 
> 
>
> 
> 
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>  />
> 
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
>
> 
>  Level="1" Absent="disallow">
> 
> 
> 
>
> I get everything correct, meaning I have in the log file the following:
> MSI (s) (08:24) [10:13:46:801]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Adding INSTALLDIR
> property. Its value is 'Z:\Program Files\MyTestInstallDirectory'.
> MSI (s) (08:24) [10:13:46:801]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Adding Modules
> property. Its value is 'Z:\Program
> Files\MyTestInstallDirectory\Modules'.
>
> 2) BUT, if in the code the MyDoc.txt component is missing, the
> INSTALLDIR property is wrong. So, for the code:
>
> 
> 
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>  />
> 
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
>
> 
>  Level="1" Absent="disallow">
> 
> 
>
> In the log file I can see:
> MSI (s) (08:B0) [10:16:49:444]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Adding INSTALLDIR
> property. Its value is 'C:\Program Files\MyTestInstallDirectory\'.
> MSI (s) (08:B0) [10:16:49:444]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Modifying Modules
> property. Its current value is 'Z:\Program
> Files\MyTestInstallDirectory\Modules'. Its new value: 'Z:\Program
> Files\MyTestInstallDirectory\Modules\'.
>
>
> Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong? I think in both cases the
> INSTALLDIR should have the correct value (Z:\Program Files\...) on
> uninstall.
> Any tip is appreciated.
> Thank you,
> MeCoco
>
>
>
> On 3/7/2011 7:24 PM, MeCoco wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a very extensive installer, written by somebody that left our
>> company, and I have to add a custom action that should be executed at
>> the end of the uninstaller (only when completely removed from control
>> panel, not in case of an update) in order to remove a file that was at
>> a later point created by our product.
>>
>> I wrote a small test-installer to do just that and everything works
>> fine: the custom action that  should delete a specific file from the
>> installation directory is run at the e

Re: [WiX-users] custom actions after reboot

2011-03-10 Thread Matthew Slane
Thanks,

I'll take a look at bootstrapping.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa367553.aspx gave me the
impression that after the forecereboot, the installer would be
relaunched and I could then perform the queue set up, hence trying to
perform the MSMQ stuff before installing any files.

-Original Message-
From: David Watson [mailto:dwat...@sdl.com] 
Sent: 09 March 2011 17:20
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] custom actions after reboot

Put a launch condition in that cancels your installation if msmq is not
installed.

If you really need to install msmq for your user use a bootstrapper that
installs it before your msi is called.

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Slane [mailto:matthew.sl...@thetrainline.com] 
Sent: 09 March 2011 16:58
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] custom actions after reboot

Hi, 

I'm getting a bit frustrated with constantly rebooting to try and get
this working.

If MSMQ is installed the queue gets created.  If MSMQ isn't installed,
it gets installed and throws the following message before forcing the
reboot:

"The installer has encountered an unexpected error installing this
package. This may indicate a problem with the package.  The Error code
is 28101."

I'm using an wsx file based on the tutorial at
www.tramontana.co.hu/wix/lesson1.php

I need to force the reboot and then install the msmqueues component if
MSMQ gets installed.


http://schemas.microsoft.com/wix/MsmqExtension";
 xmlns:util="http://schemas.microsoft.com/wix/UtilExtension";>

  







  

  

  
  

  

  

  













  

  
  

NOT MSMQAVAILABLE
  



  



  NOT
MSMQAVAILABLE
  NOT
MSMQAVAILABLE
  NOT
MSMQAVAILABLE
  
NOT MSMQAVAILABLE
  

  



-Original Message-
From: Matthew Slane [mailto:matthew.sl...@thetrainline.com] 
Sent: 04 March 2011 10:22
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [WiX-users] custom actions after reboot

Hi,

 

I've got a property that checks whether MSMQ is available and custom
actions to install it if it isn't.  I've also got MsmqExtension working
to create queues.  I haven't got them working together.  The installer
works nicely if MSMQ is already installed, otherwise it installs the
program but throws 28101 error messages and the queues arent' created.
Looking at the logs this appears to be caused by failing to load
mqrt.dll.  I suspect this is because the machine needs rebooting after
installing MSMQ.  

 

How would I go about creating the queues post-reboot if MSMQ is
installed when running the msi?  I could do it on start up in the
programs that are installed, but I'm meant to be in feature freeze until
after first release, plus I'm curious.

 

Thanks

 

Matt.

The information in this email (and any attachments) is confidential and
is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed. If you received this email in error please tell us by reply
email (or telephone the sender) and delete all electronic copies on your
system or other copies known to you. Trainline Investments Holdings
Limited (Registered No.5776685), Trainline.com Limited (Registered No.
3846791) and Trainline Scotland Limited (Registered No. 6881309) are all
registered in England and Wales with registered office at The Matrix, 9
Aldgate High Street, London, EC3N 1AH.

--
What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You
This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details
its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative
solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d
___
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users
The information in this email (and any attachments) is confidential and
is
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed. If you received this email in error please tell us by reply
email
(or telephone the sender) and delete all electronic copies on your
system or
other copies known to you. Trainline Investments Holdings Limited
(Registered
No.5776685), Trainline.com Limited (Registered No. 3846791) and
Trainline
Scotland Limited (Registered No. 6881309) are all registered in England
and
Wales with registered office at The Matrix, 9 Aldgate High Street,
London,
EC3N 1AH.


-
-
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d

[WiX-users] Patching Merge module

2011-03-10 Thread Arun Kumar
Hi All,

I am building WIX MSI that has integrated Merge Module.
Now I am creating patches for this MSI.
I know that I can specify ComponentRef's in my patch.wxs file but is there any 
way to provide patch for the integrated Merge Module?

Thank You all in advance.
Regards,
AK.


DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
property of Persistent Systems Ltd. It is intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, distribute or 
use this message. If you have received this communication in error, please 
notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. Persistent Systems 
Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected mails.
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users