Hi Todd,
We use ADC like this - creating accounts in AD, and allowing ADC to manage the
creation of 5.5 mailboxes across four Exchange servers. You
can specify the Exchange server to use by setting msExchHomeServerName on the AD
account. ADC then uses this to place the mailbox in
Exchange.
We
Hi
there,
I've a
question regarding browsing the Active Directory with
clients.
On a
W2K client there's a folder in "My Network Places" where I can browse through
the AD structur in order to find objects in AD.
I did
not found this option on a XP client. Can someone tell me where this
Volker I don't know if there is the browse equivalent, but the XP search has
the option to look specifically in AD.
If you find out the answer to this let me know.
All the best,
Andy
- Original Message -
From: SEYBOLDT,VOLKER (HP-Germany,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's an answer to this question posted by a Microsoft employee in the Microsoft AD
newsgroup yesterday. It includes an (unsupported) method to get the functionality
into XP.
*
This has been discussed at length in this forum already. It was removed from the
Windows XP client.
Hello Everyone
I was at Comdex in Toronto last week and got talking to a Microsoft
Techie about how I want to eliminate the domain requirement when a student
logs into the network. He said you can do this by making the desktops sign
into the site they are apart of rather then the domain,
Dave I would be interested in knowing how you solved that problem.
Eventually I may have multiple servers that run exchange. Thanks
Justin A. Salandra, MCSE
Senior Network Engineer
Catholic Healthcare System
914.681.8117 office
646.483.3325 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
I think you do that by setting subnets to sites and making sure that there
is a Global Catalog server in each site. However, all down-level clients
can only login to the PDC Emulator, there is no other way for down-level
clients, unless someone has figured out a way.
-Original
AD can hold millions of objects, there is however a limit to the OU
structure you can have, I think the OU Structure can only be 62 levels deep
and I believe after 40 levels the GPO's no longer travel down the levels. I
heard this from a consultant that taught AD as a MCT. He showed me the
Interesting, I have not heard of that, does anyone else here able to shed
some light on this?
-Original Message-
From: Rene Chakraborty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [ActiveDir] Site Login
Well a
One of my network administrators assigns Office XP Pro to all his users.
This is working, but now he is implementing a Terminal Server, and when
users login to Terminal Services, the GPO is not installing the App? Any
Ideas? Does he have to Publish it to the terminal server instead of
depending
More details then :-)
We've got four Exchange servers, and use a utility I wrote to generate Domain accounts
and mailboxes for new users. It's been through
several revisions, orginally creating NT4 domain accounts and 5.5 mailboxes, but all
it does now is to create the AD account, and set
What I want to eventually do is have my server running 5.5, upgrading to
2000 and then implementing several exchange 2000 servers at locations that
have more then 150 users, which ends up being three sites. I will be making
all the domains at all facilities as child domains of my domain tree
Well, I have done some testing between NDS and AD and one thing I find
is for certain. When you are dealing with a large number of users, NDS
handles rights allocation faster and with less problems.
Rene
- Original Message -
From: Salandra, Justin A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
What is
loopback policy processing?
-Original
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:36
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Software
Distribution
Is loopback policy processing enabled?
Ben
Please respond
Justin,
You can do this via ADUC. If you've installed the Exchange 2000 System Manager then
when you choose to mailbox enable an account you should
see your Exchange 5.5 servers in the list you can use. If you use a script you need to
set (at least) msExchHomeServerName when you create
the
Hi Rene,
I have a friend who administers a directory for a large university with
approximately double the number of users you mention and quite a few more
servers, across 15 sites. There are no scalability problems with doing
this, but its worth noting that your life will be easier the better
All of my exchange servers will be in the same organization but in different
domains and different AD Sites.
-Original Message-
From: Thornley, Dave H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:23 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADC
Should I install the Exchange 2000 System manager in my current environment
of Exchange 5.5 and the Exchange 2000 ADC?
-Original Message-
From: Thornley, Dave H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:23 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE:
Title: Educating users on proper AD use ;-)
Hello
I understand that Microsoft wants users to get away from Network Neighborhood and start using features of Active Directory. In most of the books that I have there is mention of this and that eventually you won't have to use Network
Title: Message
OK, so if I collapse the Child-domains into the
parent and go with 1 domain with OUs seperating the users. Is there any
way to contain the users and make 99% sure they cannot attack a server?
Rene
I just created a new attribute in AD and set a while
using ADSI Edit for the user class.
But I am unable to query it using VBScript. I get the
following error:
Error Type:
Provider (0x80004005)
Unspecified error
/ADSQuery.asp, line 52
I am using windows integrated authentication.
Can anyone
Title: Message
Dennis,
My apologies I must have been on a rant I stand corrected.
James
-Original
Message-
From: Dennis M. Depp
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2002 3:27
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Software
Update Services:
I'm not sure what you mean by attack.
If you mean attack in the hacking sense of the word, then IMHO, child
domains and OUs won't make any difference. Once you are on the wire, most
traditional techniques are independent of how you logon to what ever
network.
Diane
-Original
23 matches
Mail list logo