RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question

2003-08-27 Thread Rick Kingslan
:33 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question :)  Sorry...I only highlighted the words because that's the statement from MS, and to thumbtack the issue.  It caught my eye only after your post, but I was responding to the general thread.   I've seen this issue float

RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question

2003-08-27 Thread Rod Trent
Jon, if you wouldn't mind, send your TAM's name offline. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/USSent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:33 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question I agree completely. It is funny

RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question

2003-08-27 Thread Jon Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/US
To <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc Subject RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question John,   Show him the statement from TruSecure.  Microsoft is not going to repond to it, as they denied that it was a problem from day one.  Russ so much as sadmits this and the problem is now histo

RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question

2003-08-27 Thread Rod Trent
sday, August 27, 2003 10:20 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question Rod,   With all due respect, did I somehow indicate otherwise?  If I miscommunicated the message, I'd appreciate guidance on how to better answer a question of this type.   -rtk From: [EMAIL PROTEC

RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question

2003-08-27 Thread Rick Kingslan
9:10 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question SP4 DOES NOT reintroduce the vulnerability. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick KingslanSent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:02 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question

RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question

2003-08-27 Thread Rick Kingslan
P - Active DirectoryAssociate ExpertExpert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/USSent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:00 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question SP4 was release

RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question

2003-08-27 Thread Hutchins, Mike
which one came out first chronologically? From: Jon Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:03 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] SP4 question I have heard mixed opinions on whether or not installing Win2k SP4 breaks the MS03-026 patch

[ActiveDir] SP4 question

2003-08-27 Thread Jon Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/US
I have heard mixed opinions on whether or not installing Win2k SP4 breaks the MS03-026 patch. Does anyone have any links to docs form MS about this subject. NTBUGTRAQ posted  some reports from people that SP4 did break the patch, but later found it to be untrue. Thanks Jon Hicks | KEMET Elec