Is it cheaper and more efficient to go the replication lag site route than
buy a proper backup and object level restore solution?
I mean not to toot a vendor's horn, but Quest recovery manager turns the
process of restoring objects into a 15 minute click click operation. I
would hate to think o
to avoid a
situation where something awful happens just before a lag site happens to
replicate. Someone detailed this earlier, and it's a good note!
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd
(NIH/CC/DNA)
Sent: Thursday, Ma
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Holme
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 16:16
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag site----Why?
Two more notes on this issue:
1) THIRD PARTY AD RESTORE TOOLS. Sounds like it's clear, now, WHY lag sites
are so pop
:16 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
Two more notes on this issue:
1) THIRD PARTY AD RESTORE TOOLS. Sounds like it's clear, now, WHY lag sites
are so popular. Yes, there are third party products (particularly Quest
Rec
s.
>
> Todd
>
> _
>
> From: Dan Holme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thu 5/19/2005 10:16 AM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
>
>
>
> Two more notes on this issue:
>
> 1) THIRD
dd
(NIH/CC/DNA)
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 11:59 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
I disagree that Lag sites are popular, maybe with you and at AD conferences
as a session. I tend to avoid those sessio
>
> I am waiting for Guido to chime in on this.
>
> Todd
>
> _
>
> From: Dan Holme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thu 5/19/2005 10:16 AM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
>
>
>
> Two
y 20, 2005 15:49
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
>
> Todd,
>
> With all due respect, I think there are more people doing
> this than you think. You arent using a Lag Site, so its
> whacky. Your opinion, so yo
ginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge de Almeida
Pinto
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 8:43 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag site----Why?
You are correct there are free tools to do a restore of ob
hings
back.
joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Adner
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 5:24 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
Using my non-scientific personal observations,
D] on behalf of joe
Sent: Fri 5/20/2005 10:07 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
I would tend to agree with what David is saying from what I have seen of lag
sites as well.
Not many people, relatively, doing it, those that are are lik
I read Joe's comments as not creating a lag site per-se, but using virtual
DC's which are periodically saved (I'll refrain from saying backed up since
it's not a "backup", as was recently discussed) in order to perform a
Forest-wide recovery. I don't think he was referring to recovery of a few
del
owsxp/expertzone
WebLog - www.msmvps.com/willhack4food
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 3:49 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
Todd,
With all due resp
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
Thanks Rick,
I didn't think it to strong. And took no offense.
As most of you know, I am a "buy" guy.
When I reviewed AD back when, I new that we were in trouble if we had any accidents with administration
ernative.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: David Adner
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: 5/21/2005 5:08 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
I read Joe's comments as not creating a lag site per-se, but using
virtual
DC's which are periodically saved
OTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 3:45 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
Joe, you pretty much agreed with the lag site proposition towards the end of
your piece. Whether yo
Correct.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Adner
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 5:08 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
I read Joe's comments as not creating a lag sit
tart for a
forest rebuild
(3) A DC drops dead
We all know this one.
Restore the DC from a backup or do a metadata cleanup and rebuild the DC
from scratch
Cheers,
#JORGE#
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: 5/22/2005 1:15 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDi
ough to fully delegate
away the risk of object deletion.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge de Almeida
Pinto
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 5:41 AM
To: 'joe '; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '; 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.or
nd not optimal for doing its stated
purpose?
joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Holme
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 9:49 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
I think Jo
else they WILL break. I will not pony up additional
responsibility because their app doesn't work properly.
joe
-Original Message-
From: Jorge de Almeida Pinto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 8:41 AM
To: 'joe '; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] ';
'Acti
e are a lot of decisions to be made and each IS different for
each company
Cheers
#JORGE#
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: 5/22/2005 7:05 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
1.
> I assume almost everyone has an ins
users while restoring
a new forest in parallel.
And yes, there are a lot of decisions to be made and each IS different for
each company
Cheers
#JORGE#
-Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: 5/22/2005 7:05 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replica
ns
on such a "fairly exotic" topic.
Cheers,
Guido
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mike kline
Sent: Montag, 23. Mai 2005 13:38
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
haha,
:20 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
oh, gee, I'm too late - but I had a great weekend ;-))
I'd have to say (and all the posts show themselves) that there is no single
right or wrong answers to lag sites. It's one buildi
t
find NTDSUTIL overly difficult or intensive to use.
But, that's just me.
-rtk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd
(NIH/CC/DNA)
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 8:34 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 5/19/2005 11:12 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag site----Why not?
Todd -
I personally don't have a problem with Recovery Manager.
That being said - Last I checked, Microsoft still didn't allow it as a
SUPPORTAB
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd
(NIH/CC/DNA)
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 11:51 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy not?
Disagree Rick,
MS chan
ert
> Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
> WebLog - www.msmvps.com/willhack4food
>
> _
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd
> (NIH/CC/DNA)
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 11:51 AM
> T
29 matches
Mail list logo
