RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-30 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
-- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:gilk@;netpro.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:11 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-30 Thread Roger Seielstad
om: Tucker, Mark [mailto:MTucker@;aelita.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:20 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC > > > Gil, you are correct. I think Roger is confusing not having > a the client's subnet defined in AD with auto-site c

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-30 Thread Roger Seielstad
r. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:gilk@;netpro.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:11 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC >

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-29 Thread Tucker, Mark
nt: Tue 10/29/2002 1:10 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC But NETLOGON does create SRV recs to cover DC-less sites if there are sites and subnets defined, which is what the ori

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-29 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:19 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Site coverage works exactly as Stuart Kwan explained - without manual intervention of the RR records, the actual logins are processed fai

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-29 Thread Roger Seielstad
-- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:gilk@;netpro.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:27 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subjec

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-29 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
inovis.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 7:43 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC > If you decide to create an empty site (no DCs)for you subnets, the > autosite coverage algorithm will ensure that clients in that site are > authenticat

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-29 Thread Roger Seielstad
l Message- > From: Tucker, Mark [mailto:MTucker@;aelita.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:20 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC > > > I would agree that you want to register the subnets in Sites and > Services. > > If a

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-25 Thread Stuart Kwan
walk of a randomly arranged list.     -Original Message- From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:50 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC   I haven't tested it myself, but I doubt very muc

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-25 Thread Fugleberg, David A
ary. -gil -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:39 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC > Oh, and this all does assume that YOUR network engineers TELL you when > they pu

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-24 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
f the quickest. -Original Message-From: Garello, Kenneth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:07 PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC How much overhead does leaving it up to the locator incur?   Ken  

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-24 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:39 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC > Oh, and this all does assume that YOUR network engineers TELL you when > they put in a whole

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-24 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
ginal Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:59 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC >From experience, I wouldn't trust the locator to get 'close' very >often. Du

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-24 Thread Tucker, Mark
closest site based on cost will register site-specific SRV records for the empty site. -Mark -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:39 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-24 Thread Roger Seielstad
ner > MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000 > > "Any sufficiently advanced technology > is indistinguishable from magic." > --- Arthur C. Clarke > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@;mail.activedir.o

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-24 Thread Rick Kingslan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@;mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of > Roger Seielstad > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:59 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC > > > >From experience, I wouldn't trus

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-24 Thread Roger Seielstad
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Garello, Kenneth [mailto:KGarello@;worcester.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:07 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subje

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-24 Thread Roger Seielstad
You need to create a subnet, but not a discrete site. We tend to run a hub and spoke WAN layout - a small number of larger offices, each with a full infrastructure, all interconnected. The smaller offices are spoked off one of the larger offices. In the case of small offices without domain control

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-23 Thread Garello, Kenneth
Title: Message How much overhead does leaving it up to the locator incur?   Ken   -Original Message- From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:37 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC  

RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

2002-10-23 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
Title: Message Hey Don,   Is this your first post to the list? If so, welcome.   To answer your question, no you don't have to create a site for each subnet. You can associate multiple subnets with a single site. Or you can leave the subnets unassigned, and the DC locator will do its best t