No, what's required is that the AI develop mappings into it's model of
the universe (derived from its own sensors) from the artificially
constructed model. This is the way one learns mathematical physics, or
reading music (and, I presume, reading in general, but I don't remember
that). It's d
The problem with all traditional knowledge bases (CYC too) it is still
all meaningless symbols for the processing computer program, processed
according to relational rules in the KB, which are all entered by _human
beings_.
An AI would need to develop it's own KB, like a child - we all have ou
Matt,
I agree w/ your question...
I actually think KB's can be useful in principle, but I think they
need to be developed
in a pragmatic way, i.e. where each item of knowledge added can be validated via
how useful it is for helping a functional intelligent agent to achieve
some interesting
goals.
--- "YKY (Yan King Yin)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2007 11:08 PM, Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is the goal of your system. What application?
> Sorry about the delay, and Merry Xmas =)
>
> The goal is to provide an easy input for AGI, temporarily until full NL
>
On Dec 28, 2007 12:45 AM, YKY (Yan King Yin)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's why I want to build an interface that lets users provide grammatical
> information and the likes. The exact form of the GUI is still unknown --
> maybe like a panel with a lot of templates to choose from, or like the
On Dec 21, 2007 11:08 PM, Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the goal of your system. What application?
Sorry about the delay, and Merry Xmas =)
The goal is to provide an easy input for AGI, temporarily until full NL
capacity is achievable.
I guess most AGIers would have realized b
--- "YKY (Yan King Yin)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm planning to write an NL interface that uses templates to eliminate
> parsing and thus achieve 100% accuracy for a restricted subset of English
> (for example, asking the user to disambiguate parts of speech, syntax etc).
> It seems that su
i.org
3008 Oak Crest Ave.
Austin, Texas, USA 78704
512.791.7860
- Original Message
From: YKY (Yan King Yin) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 5:47:18 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] NL interface
On 12/21/07, Stephen Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On 12/21/07, Stephen Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The above propositions have terms expressed in RDF, but are presented in
the lispy fashion desired by the original Fluid Construction Grammar
implementers. ( ). Note that I include
discourse axioms (e.g. PreviouslyIntroducedInThisDiscourse).
- Original Message
From: YKY (Yan King Yin) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 9:41:10 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] NL interface
On 12/21/07, Stephen Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi YKY,
>
> I hope that by this
On 12/21/07, Stephen Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi YKY,
>
> I hope that by this time next year the Texai project will have a robust
English parser suitable for your project. I am working in collaboration
with the Air Force Research Laboratory's Synthetic Teammate Project
http://texai.org/
ROTECTED]>
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 8:32:56 PM
Subject: [agi] NL interface
I'm planning to write an NL interface that uses templates to eliminate parsing
and thus achieve 100% accuracy for a restricted subset of English (for example,
asking the user to di
I'm planning to write an NL interface that uses templates to eliminate
parsing and thus achieve 100% accuracy for a restricted subset of English
(for example, asking the user to disambiguate parts of speech, syntax etc).
It seems that such a program doesn't exist yet.
It looks like AGI-level NLP i
13 matches
Mail list logo
