Interestingly, this message is not in my normal font, but it is
different from the font the report was in. The font of this message
isn't even monospace for some reason.
On 4/28/2018 4:56 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, ATMunn wrote:
For some reason, this report and many of
it matters because of the quorum for next week. can't have conditional quorum.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 5:21 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Actually nvm I don't care all that much - I withdraw this CFJ.
>
> Interestingly, this leave the CoE kinda in limbo. I've done
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
You might see the same weirdness with this message, since I'm also using
Alpine, although the terminal version.
Indeed that also got a weird header. In the terminal Alpine, there's a
Posting Character Set option to override the autodetection.
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, ATMunn wrote:
For some reason, this report and many of your other reports show up in a
weird font for me. Does this happen to other people?
Not to me (my terminal window only has the one font), but I suspect it has
something with the Referee report's
Content-Type:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> > So if another rule says "you can do X by paying [without
> > destination]", then since paying for it is an attempt to decrease
> > your balance, that's a pretty strong implication that you do it
> > by
For some reason, this report and many of your other reports show up in a
weird font for me. Does this happen to other people?
On 4/28/2018 4:21 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
The Police Blotter
Huh - I've been using Forward on each past report and lightly editing, it
seems that method adds a little whitespace to the left of any already-
indented lines each time and the tables have been creeping rightwards...
of whitespace to the beginning
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Players (19) (by Rule 869, Persons with 'Registered' Citizenship, z=zombie)
Player Contact
Registered
-- ---
--
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, Corona wrote:
Yeah, might as well piggyback on this scare. I award myself a black ribbon.
I act on behalf of Quazie to award em a black ribbon for the purpose of
satisfying eir scare debt, flipping eir Boo Lien switch to FALSE.
By the last Tailor Report of 12 Feb, Quazie
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On behalf of omd, omd awards emself a black ribbon in order
to satisfy eir scare debt (flpping eir boo lien switch to FALSE).
By the last Tailor Report of 12 Feb, omd already has a black ribbon.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
So if another rule says "you can do X by paying [without
destination]", then since paying for it is an attempt to decrease
your balance, that's a pretty strong implication that you do it
by destroying it. And if you pay someone else, you're not doing
I thought of that. In some ways that would be preferable, but they're
an interesting system that hasn't been around that long. When it gets
closer to October (presuming we don't get rid of it sooner), we should
maybe come up something where we could create a timed repeal, and then
make delaying it
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I don't know if this will turn out to be useful, but I've put a protos repo
> on our github:
> https://github.com/AgoraNomic/protos
>
> I've put in there an Assets start-of-proto. Right now, it's a copy of the
Nope. Indestructible assets can only be destroyed by a rule "other
than this one" to catch exactly this kind of problem.
-Aris
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:18 PM, Corona wrote:
> Hmm, does this mean you can arbitrarily destroy indestructible assets by
> attempting to
Hmm, does this mean you can arbitrarily destroy indestructible assets by
attempting to transfer them to nobody in particular?
~Corona
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
>
>
> Ok I looked up competent authority and see how it works in this
> context.
15 matches
Mail list logo