On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 02:09:02AM +0200, Nicklas Bondesson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently amanda spits out level 1 dumps when pushing data to the
> holdingdisk. Is there a way to "force" it to do level 0 (full) backups when
> dumping to the holdingdisk?
>
> When dumping to tape it always does level
--On Wednesday, June 22, 2005 02:09:02 +0200 Nicklas Bondesson <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently amanda spits out level 1 dumps when pushing data to the
> holdingdisk. Is there a way to "force" it to do level 0 (full) backups when
> dumping to the holdingdisk?
>
> When dumping to t
Hello everyone,
I am looking for a way to send emails for amdump only
on error. Is this possible?
Has anyone else run into this problem/issue? I'm still
searching this list and the documentation, but so far,
nothing.
Thank you in advance for any information that you may
have,
Hi,
Currently amanda spits out level 1 dumps when pushing data to the
holdingdisk. Is there a way to "force" it to do level 0 (full) backups when
dumping to the holdingdisk?
When dumping to tape it always does level 0 (full) backups.
Regards,
Nicklas
I'm trying to compile Amanda 2.4.5 on Solaris 10 3/05 on an E450.
I searched the list archives and google, but haven't had much luck at
finding anything.
I created and amanda user and group, my configure line was:
"./configure --with-user=amanda --with-group=amanda". Then, I did a
"make" and get
<< IMPORTANT INFORMATION! >>
This is an automated message.
The message you sent (attached below) requires confirmation
before it can be delivered. To confirm that you sent the
message below, just hit the "R"eply button and send this
message back (you don't need to edit anything). Once this is
do
--On Tuesday, June 21, 2005 14:28:42 -0700 Andrew Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am working with an Amanda installation that was a little neglected.
> It backs up nightly and I have run a number of successful restores with
> it. So, it appears operational.
>
> Several t
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:11:34PM -0700, Kevin Dalley wrote:
>
>
> Matt Hyclak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:26:49PM -0700, Kevin Dalley enlightened us:
> >> Thanks for the suggestion. Setting record to no seems like a good idea.
> >>
> >> However, dumpcycle set
Greetings,
I am working with an Amanda installation that was a little neglected.
It backs up nightly and I have run a number of successful restores with
it. So, it appears operational.
Several tape changes were missed over the last year and the unflushed
jobs on the holding disk have accumulate
Matt Hyclak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:26:49PM -0700, Kevin Dalley enlightened us:
>> Thanks for the suggestion. Setting record to no seems like a good idea.
>>
>> However, dumpcycle set to 0 doesn't work for me. amdump tries to run
>> a full backup each day. I
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:26:49PM -0700, Kevin Dalley enlightened us:
> Thanks for the suggestion. Setting record to no seems like a good idea.
>
> However, dumpcycle set to 0 doesn't work for me. amdump tries to run
> a full backup each day. I only use 1 or 2 tapes per amdump, and I
> need 6-
Thanks for the suggestion. Setting record to no seems like a good idea.
However, dumpcycle set to 0 doesn't work for me. amdump tries to run
a full backup each day. I only use 1 or 2 tapes per amdump, and I
need 6-10 tapes for a complete archival backup. So I need a few days
to complete an arc
I've been banging my head against a wall trying to figure out why I
couldn't backup a few clients even though all the checks seemed to run
OK. Sure enough, turned out to be a firewall/iptables issue ... my
amanda server was allowed in on ports 10080, 10082, 10083 but NOT on any
other ports
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:07:17PM -0400, Brian E. Seppanen wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>
> mv /etc/path_to_inst to /etc/path_to_inst20050621
> reboot -- -ras
> rebuild path_to_inst
>
I forgot to suggest that a reboot might not be needed.
Probably the following would have th
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 08:27:44AM -0400, Brian E. Seppanen wrote:
Has anyone been able to configure the HP Storage Works 1/8 Tape Autoloader
for use with amanda as a tape library. I'm able to access data from
individual tapes by manually loading them a
Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
AIT-4 sure looks pretty though.
We've used AIT-3 for a couple of years and AIT-4 for 6-months or so. No
significant problems.
BUT - my AIT-4 drive apparently can't even read AIT-3 tapes. Seems
mind-bogglingly stupid but my vendor assures me it's true (haven't
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 at 9:36am, Brandon D. Valentine wrote
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:20:45AM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> > As long as we're talking drives and media (and I'm in the market), does
> > anyone have any experience with S-AIT? According to my vendor, it has the
> > same sma
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:20:45AM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> As long as we're talking drives and media (and I'm in the market), does
> anyone have any experience with S-AIT? According to my vendor, it has the
> same smart compresser as AIT and a capacity of 500GB/tape (vs. 400GB for
>
Hi,
so now amrecover works as far as switching the tape is concerned, but
i am still unable to recover files :(. here's the output:
amrecover> extract
Extracting files using tape drive /dev/nst0 on host db1.
The following tapes are needed: DailySet1017
Restoring files into directory /tmp
Continu
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 08:27:44AM -0400, Brian E. Seppanen wrote:
> Has anyone been able to configure the HP Storage Works 1/8 Tape Autoloader
> for use with amanda as a tape library. I'm able to access data from
> individual tapes by manually loading them and accessing them as
> /dev/rmt/0,
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 04:57, Anthony Worrall wrote:
>I might be wrong but amplot seems to give information on a single
> run.
>
Yes I believe so. I've never given it a wild card to see what it
shows for the whole tapelist. As it treats time as the horizontal
scale, I'd guess it would require
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 at 11:41am, Toomas Aas wrote
> Fabricio Luiz Machado wrote:
>
> > Some of my DDS-4 tapes are bad (I/O error).
> > So... i´m thinking if these tapes are trustworthy... :-/
> > Are there another better solution, that I can trust more than DDS-4 ?
> > Maybe DLT ?
I can second th
Agree here. We like AIT. And now AIT-4 is out.
Chen
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 08:17:55PM -0300, Fabricio Luiz Machado wrote:
Hi.
Some of my DDS-4 tapes are bad (I/O error).
So... i?m thinking if these tapes are trustworthy... :-/
Are there another better solution, that I can trust more than DDS-
Has anyone been able to configure the HP Storage Works 1/8 Tape Autoloader
for use with amanda as a tape library. I'm able to access data from
individual tapes by manually loading them and accessing them as
/dev/rmt/0, but I'm not sure if there is a device id that I can use to
access the actu
Vects wrote:
0 dumpers busy : 0:00:00 ( 0.00%)
1 dumper busy : 0:41:06 ( 70.46%)no-bandwidth: 0:41:06
(100.00%)
2 dumpers busy : 0:17:13 ( 29.53%)no-bandwidth: 0:17:13
(100.00%)
3 dumpers busy : 0:00:00 ( 0.00%)
4 dumpers busy : 0:00:00 ( 0.01%)
Here you got
Hommersom, Gerrit (G) wrote:
For emergency testing I want to read the amanda files with standard Unix/Linux
tools
W Curtiss preson's book suggests that amanda tapes can be read with the command
dd -if=/dev/nst0 bs=32k count=1
Note that dd does not take options with a hyphen, at not on any OS
Vects wrote:
> Today I run another 'Full' set and had opportunity to test what Stefan
> said. I still saw single dumping process per host but something got
> changes and I found two dumping processes on the same computer in
> parallel. I'll run amplot on current Full and publish amfiles later
> to
Hi Everyone,
Today I run another 'Full' set and had opportunity to test what Stefan
said. I still saw single dumping process per host but something got
changes and I found two dumping processes on the same computer in
parallel. I'll run amplot on current Full and publish amfiles later
today.
Thank
For emergency testing I want to read the amanda files with standard Unix/Linux
tools
W Curtiss preson's book suggests that amanda tapes can be read with the command
dd -if=/dev/nst0 bs=32k count=1
Attempting to move it to the next file with
mt /dev/nst0 fsf 1
dd -if=/dev/nst0 bs=32k count=1
per
I might be wrong but amplot seems to give information on a single run.
The idea of using awstats is to give historical information over months
Also I am already using awstats for web and ftp servers so it would be
easier
to have on place to look at stats.
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 20 Ju
Fabricio Luiz Machado wrote:
Some of my DDS-4 tapes are bad (I/O error).
So... i´m thinking if these tapes are trustworthy... :-/
Are there another better solution, that I can trust more than DDS-4 ?
Maybe DLT ?
Many people say DLT is better than DDS, but I personally have had some
very bad e
31 matches
Mail list logo
