Jerlique Bahn wrote:
> It seems Amanda is going through the process of reading the whole tape and
> therefore will take several hours to restore about 10Mb in selected files?
Yes, it will do a read of the entire tape. There is a config file option
called amrecover_do_fsf that if set to true will
Hi Frank,
> > ## This is from the changer.debug
> > MT -> /usr/local/amanda/sbin/ammt -f
> > DD -> /usr/local/amanda/sbin/amdd
> > Args -> -slot next
> > -> rewind /dev/nsa0
> > /dev/nsa0 rewind failed: Permission denied
> Looks like this is your main problem, you
Jerlique Bahn wrote:
>> Jerlique Bahn wrote:
> I have recently configured Amanda to backup our data. I am now trying
to
> restore some of the data that I have backed up, and I am having
>> problems
> doing so. The client and server are the same machine. I have chg-
>> manual
> Jerlique Bahn wrote:
> >>> I have recently configured Amanda to backup our data. I am now trying
> >> to
> >>> restore some of the data that I have backed up, and I am having
> problems
> >>> doing so. The client and server are the same machine. I have chg-
> manual
> >>> configured so that the
Jerlique Bahn wrote:
>>> I have recently configured Amanda to backup our data. I am now trying
>> to
>>> restore some of the data that I have backed up, and I am having problems
>>> doing so. The client and server are the same machine. I have chg-manual
>>> configured so that the first and last s
> > I have recently configured Amanda to backup our data. I am now trying
> to
> > restore some of the data that I have backed up, and I am having problems
> > doing so. The client and server are the same machine. I have chg-manual
> > configured so that the first and last slot are both 1. I am r
Mike Allen wrote:
> Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 02:38:31PM -0700, Mike Allen wrote:
>>
>>> Jon LaBadie wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 10:33:27AM -0700, Mike Allen wrote:
> I'm using Amanda 2.4.5 with FreeBSD 5.4.
>
> 1. Backups on t
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 02:38:31PM -0700, Mike Allen wrote:
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 10:33:27AM -0700, Mike Allen wrote:
I'm using Amanda 2.4.5 with FreeBSD 5.4.
1. Backups on the NATed side of our firew
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 02:38:31PM -0700, Mike Allen wrote:
> Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 10:33:27AM -0700, Mike Allen wrote:
> >
> >>I'm using Amanda 2.4.5 with FreeBSD 5.4.
> >>
> >>1. Backups on the NATed side of our firewall work fine.
> >>
> >>2. Our tape server is on the
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 10:33:27AM -0700, Mike Allen wrote:
I'm using Amanda 2.4.5 with FreeBSD 5.4.
1. Backups on the NATed side of our firewall work fine.
2. Our tape server is on the NATed side of firewall.
3. Backups through the firewall fail when I run
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 10:33:27AM -0700, Mike Allen wrote:
> I'm using Amanda 2.4.5 with FreeBSD 5.4.
>
> 1. Backups on the NATed side of our firewall work fine.
>
> 2. Our tape server is on the NATed side of firewall.
>
> 3. Backups through the firewall fail when I run AMCHECK.
> The er
I'm using Amanda 2.4.5 with FreeBSD 5.4.
1. Backups on the NATed side of our firewall work fine.
2. Our tape server is on the NATed side of firewall.
3. Backups through the firewall fail when I run AMCHECK.
The error message is port not secure.
I have attempted to research the envi
Jerlique Bahn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have recently configured Amanda to backup our data. I am now trying to
> restore some of the data that I have backed up, and I am having problems
> doing so. The client and server are the same machine. I have chg-manual
> configured so that the first and last
[[ !!! PLEASE PLEASE -- KEEP THE CONVERSATION ON THE LIST
It is not my job to answer these questions. Other more
knowledgeable people on the list might jump in, and, they
may even point out mistakes in my answer! ]]
On 2006-07-10 15:54, silpa kala wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for ur information.I need
Just to be clear on the original question, xfs_freeze is not an lvm
command. It's part of the xfs package xfsprogs.
-
toby bluhm
philips medical systems, cleveland ohio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
440-483-5323
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/10/2006 03:10
Hello,
I have recently configured Amanda to backup our data. I am now trying to
restore some of the data that I have backed up, and I am having problems
doing so. The client and server are the same machine. I have chg-manual
configured so that the first and last slot are both 1. I am running
amr
Dear all,
in my Amanda test lab, while trying to sort out my issues with hardware vs.
software compression, amdump didn't run on 5 July last week (I subsequently
put Amanda on hold to prevent amdump from running throughout the rest of the
week). So now I have a directory on the holding disk name
[ Please keep the information on the list -- other people
may help too. ]
On 2006-07-10 11:56, silpa kala wrote:
Hi,
I need some clarification on Amanda Internals.
Driver will initiate the chunker process and driver
will provide some information to the chunker process
like name of the file
ot 1: read label `ESSDUMP08', date `20060627'
slot 2: read label `ESSDUMP09', date `20060701'
slot 3: not an amanda tape
slot 4: read label `ESSDUMP11', date `20060708'
slot 5: read label `ESSDUMP12', date `20060710'
slot 6: read label `ESSDUMP13', date `2
On 2006-07-10 10:31, silpa kala wrote:
Hi,
Please clarify me the below statements
amandad: try_socksize: send buffer size is 65536
amandad: try_socksize: receive buffer size is 65536
amandad: time 4.786: bind_portrange2: trying port=778
amandad: time 4.786: stream_server: waiting for
connection
Hi,
Please clarify me the below statements
amandad: try_socksize: send buffer size is 65536
amandad: try_socksize: receive buffer size is 65536
amandad: time 4.786: bind_portrange2: trying port=778
amandad: time 4.786: stream_server: waiting for
connection: 0.0.0.0.778
amandad: try_socksize: send
Hi,
I need some clarification on Amanda Internals.
Driver will initiate the chunker process and driver
will provide some information to the chunker process
like name of the file for holding disk, hostname,
level, datastamp etc.,
How the driver will send the information to the
chunker? either thro
On 2006-07-08 12:44, Josef Wolf wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 11:13:44PM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
There are two approaches (maybe even many more -- I'm not the
specialist here).
One approach is to let the snapshot mechanism understand the filesystem
and work on that level. That is how xfs a
23 matches
Mail list logo