On 2008-11-04 17:45, rory_f wrote:
Hi guys,
any ideas??
My crystal ball is broken currently.
It would help to spell out the question.
--
Paul Bijnens, xplanation Technology ServicesTel +32 16 397.511
Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUMFax +32 16 397.512
http://www.
Hi guys,
any ideas??
+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--
On 2008-10-31 13:49, rakesh wrote:
Hi
Thanks a lot your recomendations worked, atlast amrecover has started but i
haven't recovered any files till now.I would like to share some entries of the
same , what am i missing in here ?
Maybe you missed reading a manual?
Maybe you missed learning so
rakesh wrote:
Hi
Thanks a lot your recomendations worked, atlast amrecover has started but i
haven't recovered any files till now.I would like to share some entries of the
same , what am i missing in here ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/backup/amanda_hold/DailySet1# amrecover
AMRECOVER Version 2.5.1p1
Hi
Thanks a lot your recomendations worked, atlast amrecover has started but i
haven't recovered any files till now.I would like to share some entries of the
same , what am i missing in here ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/backup/amanda_hold/DailySet1# amrecover
AMRECOVER Version 2.5.1p1. Contacting se
rakesh wrote:
Hi
I have tried to apply the recommended changes and after doing so i started to get the error, i have
copied syslog along with ".amandahosts" contents and xinetd config details for
"amanda"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/backup/amanda_hold/DailySet1# amrecover
AMRECOVER Version 2.5.1p1. Co
Hi
I have tried to apply the recommended changes and after doing so i started to
get the error, i have copied syslog along with ".amandahosts" contents and
xinetd config details for "amanda"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/backup/amanda_hold/DailySet1# amrecover
AMRECOVER Version 2.5.1p1. Contacting server
hi guys.
we're run amcheckdump on a backup we just did and it has given us a few outputs
we're not sure about -whether it is tar being non-understanding of a backup
using spanned tapes, or something else? we're a bit lost so hopefully someone
can help
ps. ignore the file paths below, i just c
On 2008-10-29 13:26, rakesh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/xinetd.d# cat amanda
# default: on
# description: The amanda service
service amanda
{
only_from = BackUp-Host-Server BackUp-Client
BackUp-Client BackUp-Client BackUp-Client BackUp-Client
I guess the above line was
g00f,
Don't know if this appies to you but...
but for my site we have a number of configs where we use HW
rather than SW compression.
We have the tape length set to the tape capacity and have not
altered it to account for the (somewhat unpredictable) value
of HW compression at the drive.
So w
Hi
I am unable to find any new logs and syslog does't show much details regarding
xinetd config all i could secure some logs are below when i run "amdump
DailySet1"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/amanda/server/DailySet1$ cat taper.20081030114710.debug
taper: debug 1 pid 15851 ruid 34 euid 34: start a
Hi,
looks all prety fine as Mark already told you, and now my 2 cents for the last
Question:
you see, the first disk got dumped to holdingdisk very fast, then it took
relative long
to get it written to tape, while the second disk was slowly writing to
holdingdisk, but
fast getting from there to
rory_f schrieb:
How can this (see title) be done?
If you have indexes enabled, you can unpack all index files of all
servers/filesystems and combine them to one large file. With a few lines of
shell scripting it should be easy.
--
Marc Muehlfeld (Leitung IT)
Zentrum fuer Humangenetik und
g00f schrieb:
> Tape Size (meg)1446225.1 1446225.10.0
Here is where it gets fuzzy... and not in logic. Tape size... the
> amount that was put to tape?
Yes.
> Tape Used... 359%?
Habe a look at your tapetype definition. There is a length of the tape
defined, and I'm sure i
Hey guys,
How can this (see title) be done?
We need to have a full list of all directories sent to the tape for easy and
quick restore process.
Would a simple `dd if=/dev/nst0 bs=32k skip=1 |/bin/gtar -tvf -` output a
full listing?
Is there a program within amanda to do so?
I know the
Hi,
I was hoping I could get a little help in reading the output of Amanda (2.6)
when I get the completion emails from it. Its a new install and I find it
confusing on why it makes some statements in the information email after it
completes the backup.
Here is the information from the email a
rakesh wrote:
Hi
amandad.*.debug is not generating any new logs
Then check your xinetd config and system log.
Jean-Louis
Hi
amandad.*.debug is not generating any new logs
configuration details for xinetd as below
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/xinetd.d# ls -la
total 40
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2008-10-08 19:46 .
drwxr-xr-x 83 root root 4096 2008-10-08 19:58 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 338 2008-10-08 19:43 amanda
-rw
Do amandad get executed? What's the xinetd config?
Post the amandad.*.debug file.
Jean-Louis
rakesh wrote:
Hello every one,
I am able to back-up data from different partitions on different machiens from
LAN
I am getting this error when ever i am running "amrecover" on
"BackUp-Host-Server" mac
Hello every one,
I am able to back-up data from different partitions on different machiens from
LAN
I am getting this error when ever i am running "amrecover" on
"BackUp-Host-Server" machine
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@BackUp-Host-Server:/tmp/amanda/amandad# amrecover
AMRECOVER Version 2.5.1p1. Contactin
We actually made some changes on our system we're using for backing up(bigger
holding disk, sata2 instead of sata1) and we're backing up fresh again (using
the same tapes again)
Asssuming the tapes themselves are not broke (they are new tapes), hopefully
this will work this time. if it does g
Amanda writes data to tape as quickly as the tape drive will allow.
The tapespeed is not currently used.
The data may be in local cache, explaining some of the high speed. I
don't know SATA-1 rates off the top of my head to know if that's too
fast.
Whatever goes on, data corruption should not re
This is an edited version of a previous post
Hi,
We managed to up our speed of dumping and writing a whole lot by using a
holding disk, which is great. However, the data we wrote, around 245gb, failed
a amcheckdump and i couldnt, therefore, not amrestore anything.
After the amtapetes
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 1:39 PM, rory_f <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We managed to up our speed of dumping and writing a whole lot by using a
> holding disk, which is great. However, the data we wrote, around 245gb,
> failed a amcheckdump and i couldnt, therefore, not amrestore anything.
What wa
On Friday 24 October 2008, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>>>Amanda accept a hostname "localhost" that is comming over the network? If
>>> this is possible, shouldn't this be fixed? I think not the posibility to
>>> configure it
On Friday 24 October 2008, dceola wrote:
>> And the rpm's force amanda into a different configuration when compared to
>> what you would get from the (recommended) tarball install.
>
>im confused, through the reading i had done (with relation to installing
> amanda) i never saw anything that said a
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 09:09 -0400, dceola wrote:
>
> > And the rpm's force amanda into a different configuration when compared to
> > what you would get from the (recommended) tarball install.
>
>
> im confused, through the reading i had done (with relation to installing
> amanda) i never saw
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Amanda accept a hostname "localhost" that is comming over the network? If
>> this is possible, shouldn't this be fixed? I think not the posibility to
>> configure it is the security hole itself.
>
> I don't know & will let D
On 2008-10-24 15:09, dceola wrote:
And the rpm's force amanda into a different configuration when compared to
what you would get from the (recommended) tarball install.
im confused, through the reading i had done (with relation to installing amanda) i never saw anything that said anything othe
> And the rpm's force amanda into a different configuration when compared to
> what you would get from the (recommended) tarball install.
im confused, through the reading i had done (with relation to installing
amanda) i never saw anything that said anything other than to simply download
one
On Friday 24 October 2008, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
>Gene Heskett schrieb:
>> Also one should never have a 'localhost' in this list file as its a
>> security hole. All machine are localhost, and you sure don't want somebody
>> to recover your stolen tape to their machine, or for you to get confused
>>
On Thursday 23 October 2008, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
>dceola schrieb:
>> localhost.localdomain root amindexd amidxtaped
>> localhost.localdomain amandabackup amdump
>
>You don't need this two lines. The first two are enough in this case,
> because "localhost" is resolveable without a FQDN. But it
Paul Bijnens schrieb:
> We've all started like that once. (Even if >20 years ago.)
>
> This dates from 1986:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/net.jokes/browse_thread/thread/60a9444026076c90/c49a0c0849fe8bb6
Oh my, I am ashamed ...
;-)
Stefan
On Thursday 23 October 2008, dceola wrote:
>haha, well i'm good at following instructions, typically ;)
>
>i definitely have yet to understand program paths (and rpm's i guess) here..
>
>i downloaded the server RPM file that is listed for fedora7 on the amanda
> download page, and used the command
On 2008-10-23 16:34, dceola wrote:
This is an edited version of a previous post
haha, well i'm good at following instructions, typically ;)
Then follow these instructions here:
http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Quick_start
i definitely have yet to understand program paths (and r
dceola schrieb:
i have no idea where it installed amdump, i've just been following
> the instructions to install/config everything per the amanda qikc
> start guide.. so, past that i dont know...
Have a look with
# less ...rpm
into the archive (Something in the back of fedora create the filelis
This is an edited version of a previous post
haha, well i'm good at following instructions, typically ;)
i definitely have yet to understand program paths (and rpm's i guess) here..
i downloaded the server RPM file that is listed for fedora7 on the amanda
download page, and used the
haha, well i'm good at following instructions, typically ;)
i definitely have yet to understand program paths (and rpm's i guess) here..
i downloaded the server RPM file that is listed for fedora7 on the amanda
download page, and used the command
/bin/rpm -ivh
when installing it (per the "Ins
On 2008-10-23 14:19, dceola wrote:
please excuse my lack of knowledge..
Ensure that the file is there. If it is, add "/usr/local/sbin/" to the path of
the user that is running amdump (in your case "amandabackup"). If not, then
maybe you didn't compiled client AND server (without any special c
i'm starting to feel really stupid- i didn't really understand at all what
you're saying i need to do. here's my newness to linux showing through! lol...
+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM
dceola schrieb:
How do i do this?
Do what?
- Ensure that amdump is there?
# ls /usr/local/sbin/amdump
- Add "/usr/local/sbin/" to the path of the user?
If you use bash for that user, then you can add the following line to the
users ~/.bashrc:
export PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/sbin/
--
Marc M
please excuse my lack of knowledge..
> Ensure that the file is there. If it is, add "/usr/local/sbin/" to the path
> of
> the user that is running amdump (in your case "amandabackup"). If not, then
> maybe you didn't compiled client AND server (without any special configure
> options, client
dceola schrieb:
localhost.localdomain root amindexd amidxtaped
localhost.localdomain amandabackup amdump
You don't need this two lines. The first two are enough in this case, because
"localhost" is resolveable without a FQDN. But it doesn't disturb if they stay
inside. It's just the same.
Simpson College
Phone: 515-961-1680
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dceola
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 3:19 PM
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: [Amanda-users] 'Idiots Guide' for configuring Amand
Thanks for your help, Marc.
I've been going through the 'Quick Start' guide (slowly) trying to make certain
that i'm doing everything correctly.
I'm currently confused on two similar parts... Creating the .amandahosts file
and creating the disklist file.
I only intend to backup files from thi
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:11:34PM -0400, conandor wrote:
>
> ya. i running it on smf instead of xinetd.
> any idea how can i configure it to work?
If I understand the issue...
I add the amanda entries to /etc/services and /etc/inetd.conf,
then when I hup inetd and check the system messages fil
dceola schrieb:
With regards to the specific 'how to' guide i posted a link to
> that i had been using, i made it through that guide up to the point
> of editing the changer.conf file and commenting out 4 specific
> lines in the /usr/lib/amanda/chg-zd-mtx file. I believe my confusion
> lies in t
This is an edited version of a previous post
Thanks for the response!
I went with F7 as i had someone experienced with it assisting me in setting up
my server, and at this point i have enough stuff on this server that it
wouldn't be very easy to change to a different OS.
(edit) in hi
Thanks for the response!
I went with F7 as i had someone experienced with it assisting me in setting up
my server, and at this point i have enough stuff on this server that it
wouldn't be very easy to change to a different OS.
With regards to the specific 'how to' guide i posted a link to that
Hi,
dceola schrieb:
I'm new to these forums, and am also new to Amanda, and still trying
> to learn my way around Linux (i'm using Fedora 7).
Nothing important for your problem, but if you are new to Linux, I guess you
like the easy way to keep your system secure and up to date. Maybe think a
Howdy Folks!
I'm new to these forums, and am also new to Amanda, and still trying to learn
my way around Linux (i'm using Fedora 7).
When i first came across Amanda and decided to use it as my backup solution, i
had found a 'how to' guide for configuring the software
(http://robertolitrico.bl
ya. i running it on smf instead of xinetd.
any idea how can i configure it to work?
+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
Are you running into the change in Solaris 10 from using (x)inetd to
smf? I always had trouble with initializing that configuration. If
that's what you need then I may have a few notes on getting that going
with Amanda on Solaris 10.
Quoting conandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This is an e
This is an edited version of a previous post
i would like to have advices on how to install/configure on solaris 10. thank
you.
i facing this problen when following the 15 min tutorial on amaddclient.
>
> bash-3.00$ amaddclient --config DailySet1 --client 192.168.1.205 --diskdev
>
i would like to have advices on how to install/configure on solaris 10. thank
you.
+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-
Lines like this don't look right -- Amanda must be installed, not run
out of its build directory.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:06 AM, rakesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> server = /var/lib/amanda/amanda-2.5.1p1/restore-src/.libs/amidxtaped
But this is the error preventing your amrecover from working:
hello every one,
I have compiled Amanda "amanda_2.5.1p1.orig.tar.gz" on debian 4.0 etch [ for
h/w and s/w refer "amandad.20081007131445.debug" ] I am able to backup all
clients [ amanda-2.4.x ver (old)] and amanda user is reporting back with
specified emails for all backed up clients(BackUp-Cl
This is an edited version of a previous post
Just as background only:
When we had a single office, we had 2 Snap servers (identical models). One was
the primary and the other a backup. Each user mapped 3 shares from the primary
as X, Y and Z drive. We used the Snap EDR software to cr
Just as background only: W
hen we had a single office, we had 2 Snap servers (identical models). One was
the primary and the other a backup. Each user mapped 3 shares from the primary
as X, Y and Z drive. We used the Snap EDR software to create a "replicate" and
a "backup". The replicate was
drmoque wrote:
To clarify, I don't know if I need a mirror or not. It was necessary
in our previous strategy in case our primary NAS failed (and of
course it did :)). With the Snap Server our backup data was useless
because we could not restore it to be usuable on the backup NAS
device.
Uhm, fi
drmoque wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our office uses a Snap Server NAS device to host all of our working
> files. The clients accessing the NAS are all WIndows Vista OS.
> Recently we opened a second office and the backup strategy we had
> with the Snap Server software can't be implemented until our two
> off
Hi,
Our office uses a Snap Server NAS device to host all of our working files. The
clients accessing the NAS are all WIndows Vista OS. Recently we opened a second
office and the backup strategy we had with the Snap Server software can't be
implemented until our two offices can talk to each oth
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Dustin J. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, dear -- the sourceforge bug tracker is completely unused these
> days. If there are others on the list who have submitted things to
> the sourceforge tracker, please post to the list. I should find a way
> to hid
Your response sounds about right to me. I found that if I manually deleted
files that the issue for list keys went away so it really did seem like a
buffer size issue.
Once you have a patch I will go back and clean out my extra files and basically
make the tapes clean. I did not dive real dee
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 2:12 PM, moekyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is what I posted to the bug tracker in sourceforge.
Oh, dear -- the sourceforge bug tracker is completely unused these
days. If there are others on the list who have submitted things to
the sourceforge tracker, please post
I have been having this same issue for some time and finally found a fix.
Here is what I posted to the bug tracker in sourceforge.
While listing S3 keys: CURL error: Failed writing body (CURLcode 23)
taper: Error writing label DailySet1/010 to device
Had this error any time amanda was attemptin
Hello,
Every execution of my backup, the slots are increasing, this is problematic? I
have to set something?, see below:
$ amcheck clients
Amanda Tape Server Host Check
-
Holding disk /amanda_hold_clients: 445477 MB disk space available, using 399360
MB as requested
You should put it on a Sun Thumper.
+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--
Mtrento,
There are a few different issues here:
1. Setting tape_splitsize affects the way dumps are broken up when writing to
tape, but does not affect they way they are stored on the holding disk. So
dumps will still be done directly if they are larger than the holding disk,
even if you have
hello everybody.
im running amanda 2.6.0P1
and i try to backup a DLE bigger than my LTO4 tape.
(850GB DLE on a 800 GB LTO4 TAPE)
when the backup starts , the amdump log says that there's not enough holding
disk space and it dump directly to tape.
i'am surprised because i defined a tape_splitsiz
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 02:04:01PM -0400, Debux wrote:
>
> So if I want one week of retension, I would have to use 15 tapes and change
> the value of tapecycle to 15 tapes, correct?
>
> The parameters below are correct? for 1 full backup per week, with last week
> in retension and the rest incr
So if I want one week of retension, I would have to use 15 tapes and change the
value of tapecycle to 15 tapes, correct?
The parameters below are correct? for 1 full backup per week, with last week in
retension and the rest incremental:
dumpcycle 1 Weeks
runspercycle 14 days (This parameter I
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Debux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
correct?
Yes.
And how does the retention? In the next cycle (next week) will be overridden in
the data used tapes or recording sequence occurs?
Amanda's retention policy is based exc
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Debux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> correct?
Yes.
> And how does the retention? In the next cycle (next week) will be overridden
> in the data used tapes or recording sequence occurs?
Amanda's retention policy is based exclusively on the tape cycle.
Data is retai
Well, then so that I can run from Monday to Sunday without missing one day, I
would have to include two more tapes and set up thus:
dumpcycle 1 Weeks
runspercycle 7 days
tapecycle 8 Tapes
runtapes 1
correct?
And how does the retention? In the next cycle (next week) will be overridden in
the d
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Debux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to help set up the Amanda backup for weekly full, incremental, in the
> other day and retensão of two weeks.
> I have 6 tapes LTO3.
>
> This is possible?
>
> My setup so far is this:
>
> dumpcycle 1 weeks
> runspercycle 7 d
Hi,
I want to help set up the Amanda backup for weekly full, incremental, in the
other day and retensão of two weeks.
I have 6 tapes LTO3.
This is possible?
My setup so far is this:
dumpcycle 1 weeks
runspercycle 7 days
tapecycle 6 tapes
runtapes 1
Tks!
+
This sounds similar to the problem that I was having...it turned out to be an
error in my understanding of the config. Here is the link to the post on the
backupcentral forum:
http://www.backupcentral.com/phpBB2/two-way-mirrors-of-external-mailing-lists-3/amanda-20/confusing-problem-with-no-ne
Jean-Louis took a look at my config, and it turns out I had a foolish error. I
had used the following lines from the default config:
# flush-threshold-dumped, flush-threshold-scheduled, taperflush, and autoflush
# are used to control tape utilization. See the amanda.conf (5) manpage
for
# det
What's is the runtapes setting?
It's hard to read files when many characters are converted to HTML, it's
a lot better if you attach a file, they will not be converted.
Jean-Louis
nbarss wrote:
Can you send
your whole amflush log, as well as the taper debug log?
Sure. Here is amflu
> Can you send
> your whole amflush log, as well as the taper debug log?
Sure. Here is amflush.1, taper.20080609100127.debug follows:
amdump: start at Mon Jun 9 10:01:26 MDT 2008
amdump: datestamp 20080609
amdump: starttime 20080609100126
amdump: starttime-locale-independent 2008-06-09 10:0
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:36 PM, nbarss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> taper: Total dump size should be 130801kb, part size is 21474836480kb
..
> It could just be an extra 'kb' tacked on the end, or a serious calculation
> error.
It is just a typo, but should definitely be fixed. Amanda has a bad
h
A couple of people have asked me if I have solved this, and I have not.
The error seems to be a problem with the taper not being able to write to my
tape drive. It sends a REQUEST_NEW_TAPE to the driver, who replies NO_NEW_TAPE.
I am unable to figure out what the problem is. What problem is t
On 2008-05-21 15:25, bperrotta wrote:
When Installing go message couldn't create Amanda user.
Using root user instead. Manually created Amanda user later on
but don't know which groups to add it to.
Got errors saying home directory was not created had other trouble
with user rights. No sure wh
When Installing go message couldn't create Amanda user.
Using root user instead. Manually created Amanda user later on
but don't know which groups to add it to.
Got errors saying home directory was not created had other trouble
with user rights. No sure what to do at this point help appreciate
ddelcoco schrieb:
this is what I see when I type "amstatus DailySet1"
isisrv1:/ getting estimate
...
>
This is the same since 3 hours. All appears to be freezed [Crying or Very sad]
Correct tape is loaded. Any idea? Thanks
If the filesystems are very big, this could ta
ddelcoco schrieb:
I think the only solution could be to split dumps one more than one tape, but
we are running Amanda v.2.4.4 and tape_splitsize parameter is not implemented
in our version (it was introduced in 2.5.0).
Any solution to "bypass" this and split dumps on 2.4.4? [Crying or Very sad]
Hi All,
I receive the following message from amreport. Everyday!
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
server5/data lev 7 FAILED [dumps way too big, 88524660 KB, must skip
incremental dumps]
server3/data0/data lev 5 FAILED [dumps way too big, 70851612 KB, must
skip incremental dumps]
Hi All,
this is what I see when I type "amstatus DailySet1"
isisrv1:/ getting estimate
isisrv1:/boot getting estimate
isisrv1:/data0 getting estimate
isisrv1:/var/loggetting estimate
isisrv2:/ getting
John E Hein wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote at 14:50 -0500 on Jan 1, 2008:
> I just got bit by the volatile device major number getting moved
> again, and one of the kernel developers is asking me how FreeBSD
> users cope with this since FreeBSD's device majors are all dynamic.
Well, it's not re
On Tuesday 01 January 2008, John E Hein wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote at 18:58 -0500 on Jan 1, 2008:
> > Which of course, since Murphy is alive and well, is not included in
> > any of the rpm versions of tar. Gotta love it. Is this available
> > on the zmanda site someplace?
>
>It seems that it's n
On Tuesday 01 January 2008, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
>On Jan 1, 2008 6:58 PM, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Which of course, since Murphy is alive and well, is not included in any of
>> the rpm versions of tar. Gotta love it. Is this available on the zmanda
>> site someplace?
>
>FSF
Gene Heskett wrote at 18:58 -0500 on Jan 1, 2008:
> Which of course, since Murphy is alive and well, is not included in
> any of the rpm versions of tar. Gotta love it. Is this available
> on the zmanda site someplace?
It seems that it's not in the source tarball. Sorry.
But the gtar info p
On Jan 1, 2008 6:58 PM, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which of course, since Murphy is alive and well, is not included in any of the
> rpm versions of tar. Gotta love it. Is this available on the zmanda site
> someplace?
FSF is hosting it:
http://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/html
Gene Heskett wrote at 14:50 -0500 on Jan 1, 2008:
> I just got bit by the volatile device major number getting moved
> again, and one of the kernel developers is asking me how FreeBSD
> users cope with this since FreeBSD's device majors are all dynamic.
Well, it's not really the major device,
On Tuesday 01 January 2008, John E Hein wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote at 14:50 -0500 on Jan 1, 2008:
> > I just got bit by the volatile device major number getting moved
> > again, and one of the kernel developers is asking me how FreeBSD
> > users cope with this since FreeBSD's device majors are all
Greetings;
I just got bit by the volatile device major number getting moved again, and
one of the kernel developers is asking me how FreeBSD users cope with this
since FreeBSD's device majors are all dynamic.
So if there are any FreeBSD users running amanda here, please respond and
describe ho
2007/2/7, C R Ritson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>5. Re: amverifyrun problem
>Posted by: "Guy Dallaire" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Wed Feb 7, 2007 5:37 am ((PST))
>
>2007/2/1, Guy Dallaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> If I try to run:
>>
>> amverifyrun DailySet1
>>
>> I get:
>>
>> Tape changer is c
I am currently considering to offer a training-course on Amanda later
this year.
This training would be given in Germany and held in german language :
Deshalb möchte ich die deutschsprachigen Amanda-Users mal nach dem
vorhandenen Interesse befragen, um abschätzen zu können, ob so ein Kurs
Todd,
mail.vh.org is re-sending old messages (from earlier today) to the
amanda-users mailing list. Example below. It should probably be
blocked from posting until this is fixed.
vh.org postmaster, please fix your system.
-Mitch
-- Forwarded message --
Return-Path: [EMAIL
401 - 500 of 674 matches
Mail list logo
