This should be placed in the appropriate collecting location, should it not?
Certainly shouldn¹t be ³Message OK² w/ a bad attachment.
Feb-24-10 22:24:22 <> -- Message OK -- [NISH Academy Online eLearning
Courses What s In It];
Feb-24-10 23:41:55 72910-00680 [BombSubject] 64.18.3.32
to: sjo...@f
Moved to rc2 w/ out any changes to my config and it¹s working now in the web
interface. I assume it is elsewhere.
Thanks Fritz!
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Frederick County Government, IIT
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
From: "Paul K. Dickson"
Reply-To: ASSP
I've got a problem where notifications from facebook are being
rejected due to being on a couple DNSBL services. I've got
validateRBL set to block. The behavior is normal.
I tried to make an exception for the ranges
69.63.178.0-69.63.178.255
and
69.63.184.0-69.63.184.255
by putting these in the
It doesn't seem to be checking the spamloverre then. I've tested several
different times and can't get it to recognize the keywords. Not in a real
email test or the analyzer web interface.
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Frederick County Government, IIT
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-
I put a few phrases in SpamLoversRe(both plain words and plain words
surrounded by '\b'). I then sent an email from a non-whitelisted account
with those phrases as well as several I have in blackre and bombre, to a
non-spamlover account.
The mail was not recognized as a spam-lover email even thou
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>All correct except I didn't request if it were to a spam lover. I
>want it
>passed if it is spam, and it matches that phrase.. Regardless if they
>are in
>spamlovers or not. I don't want all spam to go to everyone.. Aka I
>don't
>want everyone to be spaml
All correct except I didn't request if it were to a spam lover. I want it
passed if it is spam, and it matches that phrase.. Regardless if they are in
spamlovers or not. I don't want all spam to go to everyone.. Aka I don't
want everyone to be spamlovers of all mail.. Only mail with the keywords
Oh. :-/
Paul == red in the face :D.
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Frederick County Government, IIT
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
> From: Fritz Borgstedt
> Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list
> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:59:52 +0100
> To: ASSP development
Paul K. Dickson wrote:
>
> Fritz:
>
> That only works if the recipient is in the associated, or all
> spamlovers category. I'd like it to work for everyone in my
> domain for certain words, but certainly not everyone in the
> domain for all words(aka, I don't want to add everyone to spamlover
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Fritz:
>
>That only works if the recipient is in the associated, or all
>spamlovers
>category. I'd like it to work for everyone in my domain for certain
>words,
>but certainly not everyone in the domain for all words(aka, I don't
>want to
>add everyone to
Fritz:
That only works if the recipient is in the associated, or all spamlovers
category. I'd like it to work for everyone in my domain for certain words,
but certainly not everyone in the domain for all words(aka, I don't want to
add everyone to spamlovers).
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrat
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Id rather they automatically be tagged and passed.
Regular Expression to Identify SpamLover* (SpamLoversRe)
If a message matches this regular expression it will be considered a
SpamLover message.
I¹d like to see a regex option for key words that perhaps you always want to
fall in the warning range and not be scored otherwise(for those of us with a
primarily scoring setup). Obviously only if they are not whitelisted.
There are select words that I know always have a decent (50/50)~ (60/40)
p
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>
>but there was a small error introduced after changing back.
already changed, sorry
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compili
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> D
>>
>>
> How about your Postfix configuration?
>
>
smtpd_use_tls = yes
smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/postfix/smtpd.cert
smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/postfix/smtpd.key
smtpd_tls_loglevel = 1
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtpd_sasl_authenticated_header = yes
broken_sas
Thank you for changing your mind,
but there was a small error introduced after changing back.
In the two code lines
} elsif (!$this->{relayok} && ( ($spamaddresses
&& !$this->{nocollect}
&& matchSL( "
How does the DelayHC setting work, I think it is a bit unclear in the
interface:
The heading says: HomeCountry Pass Greylisting
The description says: Enable Greylisting for HomeCountry based IPs.
So does that mean that when this is enabled it will delay IPs from
HomeCountry?
I have tried disabling
17 matches
Mail list logo