In our church we also have the "Do you renounce Satan" and sprinkling of
everyone with holy water on Easter Sunday. (I think the Easter Vigil, also.)
Mary
On Thursday, November 7, 2013, Margaret Vicente wrote:
> Terri,
>
> I'm not sure if this will be of help to clarify what has already been
> s
Hi John,
Yes, it's not a sin. But clearly the Church does believe that the devil
might have been involved in the first baptism, and they need to exorcise it
better. I guess it makes that makes the first one a satanic rite instead of
a sin.
I understand the need for a second baptism, just to ma
The practice is the same today. It was never a sin (and still is not) for a
layman to baptize a child in case the child was at risk of dying before
baptism. Note many children "batizado pela partrira", or "a avó" (the midwife
or the grandmother). That is still the case today. However, the baptis
AM
Subject: [AZORES-Genealogy] Exorcisms? of children in Ginetes documents
I found it creepy by interesting that in a few baptism records I needed for
children in Ginetes, the word 'exorcismos' appeared. This does mean exorcisms
by a priest were performed right? or does this
Hello, Terri (and John),
My experience in seeing the baptism records is that the priest conducts an
exorcism when the children had already been baptized by a non-priest. In
some circumstances, people believed the baby would die without being
baptized so they'd baptize them themselves. However,
As I understand it, it was and still is part of the Baptismal ceremony. Baptism
is the pouring of the water over the head baptizing "in the name of the
Father" etc. But before you get to the point, there is the anointing with
holy oils and the priest applying a grain or two of salt on his th
6 matches
Mail list logo
